Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 87256

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : YC01 - YC04 Full Version

Efficacy of Kinesio Taping among Females with Postpartum Low Back Pain- A Quasi-experimental Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51643.15975
Priyanka Rishi, Joginder Yadav, Pooja Anand, Bindoo Yadav

1. PhD Scholar, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. 2. Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. 3. Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. 4. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SGT University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Priyanka Rishi,
PhD Scholar, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University,
Chandu Budhera, Gurugram-122005, Haryana, India.
E-mail: priyanka.physio@sgtuniversity.org

Abstract

Introduction: Low Back Pain (LBP) is considered to be the most salient feature during the postpartum period. The incidence of postpartum symptoms peculiarly back pain varies from women to women with vanishing of symptoms in over 60% in two days postpartum to as high as 82% at 18 months.

Aim: To explore the efficacy of kinesio tape on pain and Inter-Recti Distance (IRD) in women with Postpartum LBP.

Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted at SGT Medical Hospital and Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India in Physiotherapy Outpatient Department (OPD) and Obstetrics and Gynaecology OPD of SGT Hospital. The data was collected from July 2019 to August 2020. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (group A) or control group (group B). Group A that performed combined kinesio taping along with exercises and hot pack five times/week for six week and group B that followed conventional treatment that included exercises and hot pack. Pain and IRD was measured and analysed using Independent t-test at the baseline, end of 3rd week and at the end of 6th week. Independent t-test was used to compare the demographic characteristics as well as baseline criterion measures between both the groups.

Results: Significant improvement in pain scores (mean value of 13.75 at baseline to 3.75 at end of 6th week ) and IRD scores (mean value of 28.37 at baseline to 27.38 at last day of 6th week) were observed in group A that received kinesio taping along with conventional treatment in comparison to group B.

Conclusion: Group A showed significant improvement in IRD and pain parameters indicating improvement in LBP in postpartum women. Therefore, kinesio taping in combination with exercises may be incorporated in the management programs of the women suffering from postpartum LBP.

Keywords

Digital nylon calliper and rolland morris scale, Kinesio tape, Inter rectus distance

Approximately, 30-78% of women experiences Low Back Pain (LBP) (1),(2), which was considered a very common musculoskeletal problem during pregnancy and the declining of LBP postdelivery is a slow and incomplete process (3). Inspite of its prevalence, the LBP is often considered as a normal phenomenon and this negligence can lead to series of problems ranging from physical inactivity, sleep deprivation which results in a higher incidence of obstetric complications (4). Postpartum LBP in relation to pregnancy is a notable health problem which affects a larger number of women globally (5). The LBP in the postpartum usually starts after delivery and may continue till one year (6). Numerous studies have been done on the pathophysiology and epidemiology of LBP in pregnancy but still there is much obscurity in regard the definition and cause of LBP during and post pregnancy (7),(8).

However, it is concluded that postpartum back pain can be the result of increase of weight during the pregnancy which leads to biomechanical changes like changing the centre of gravity, disturbance in the posture and development of lordosis (9). Musculoskeletal system undergo tremendous change anatomically and physiologically as there is increase in the secretion of the relaxing hormone which leads to increase laxity of joints and leads to biomechanical change in the musculoskeletal system (10). Increase in the IRD which leads to a common condition called Diastasis Recti in the pregnant and postpartum population is seen to effects approximately 60% of postpartum women (11),(12),(13). Diastasis Recti do not subside in the early postpartum period and this was reported by Fernandes da Mota P et al., that around 52% of women experience Diastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA) at eight weeks postpartum and around 39% at six months of postpartum (14).

Although there is conflict in the literature on whether increase in the IRD is associated with the LBP or pelvic floor disorders (15) but still the experience from the clinical studies suggest that interventions involving exercises and kinesio tape may lead to improvement and decreasing distance IRD but there is no definite evidence to suggest its effectiveness. A systemic review on exercises and DRA during the ante and postnatal period found there is dearth of evidence in this area and suggested use of non invasive methods like kinesio taping as a strategy for management of LBP among postpartum women (16).

Limited literature and awareness is seen among women affected with Diastasis recti leading to increased IRD which makes them ignore the consequences associated with this, making it one of the causes for LBP in postpartum period. This brings the attention to the need to address the problem faced by the women in postpartum period and through this study it was hypothesised that a better treatment protocol could help women with postpartum back pain and lead a better quality of life as there is dearth of evidence of the management strategies in treating back pain and IRD. So, the aim of the present study targeted at finding out the effectiveness of kinesio taping in improving pain and IRD in women with postpartum LBP.

Material and Methods

A quasi-experimental study was conducted at SGT Medical Hospital and Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Research Committee (Ref no- SGTU/FOP/2019/72) (Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University) and followed the 1964 Helsinki declaration of ethical consideration. The subjects were explained about the complete procedure of the treatment program and written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. The study was conducted in the Physiotherapy OPD and Obstetrics and Gynaecology OPD of SGT hospital. The data was collected from July 2019 to August 2020. Subjects complaining of LBP from last three months were recruited.

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with age group of 20-35 years and 6-12 months postpartum, experiencing LBP from last three months and presence of IRD of minimum 9 mm at 2 cm below umbilicus, having normal vaginal delivery and singleton pregnancy were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects who reported the history of any previous surgeries and presence of any vertebral anomaly and inability to perform exercises were excluded from the study.

Subjects who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into two groups by simple random allocation method i.e., Group A (experimental group) included 20 subjects who received the kinesio taping on the abdominal muscles with the conventional physiotherapy. Group B (control group) included 20 subjects who received the conventional physiotherapy (Table/Fig 1). Data was taken through Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire for pain (17) and Digital Nylon Calliper (science ware Vernier Calliper) for IRD.

Procedure

Subjects in group A received treatment for six weeks which included taping the abdominal muscles. Kinesiology tape (3×3×2.1 inches; 3.2 Ounces Manufacturer: AZSPORT) was applied first to the abdominal muscles which was then followed by the abdominal exercises. Before starting the treatment session, the abdominal area was cleaned with alcohol to clean skin before tape application so that skin is freed from oils and lotions. Tape was applied using I band with a tension of 50% with the subject in supine position. Ten minutes rest was given after the tape application for allowing the tape to gain full adhesive strength then performed the abdominal exercises which included isometric abdominal contractions and bridging along with the hot packs. The tape was applied for three days and then removed for one day and reapplied for an additional three days. The treatment protocol took average of 40 minutes.

Subjects in group B received conventional physiotherapy which included isometric abdominal contractions and bridging along with the hot packs. Each exercise took 15 minutes for completions with one minute rest between the exercises. Hot pack was applied for 10 minutes. The data was collected at the baseline and the last day of third week and last day of sixth week using Rolland Morris questionnaire (17) (it is a 24-item based questionnaire which assess normal activities for daily living which is affected by pain and leading towards disability). The participants were asked to choose and tick the item which they found difficult to perform due to pain by LBP and scoring was done with 0 as no pain and 1 with pain and vernier calliper.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for statistical analysis and result was calculated. Independent t-test was used to compare the demographic characteristics as well as baseline criterion measures between both the groups. Also, to investigate the between group change in outcome measures.

Results

(Table/Fig 2) shows the mean and SD of age (in years) and Body Mass Index (BMI) of total subjects included in the present study were 26.78±3.764 years and 27.75±3.008 kg/m2, respectively.

The mean and SD of pain score on preintervention, three weeks after intervention and six weeks after intervention for group A and group B is shown in (Table/Fig 3). Group A had more significant improvement than Group B (Table/Fig 3).

The mean and SD of IRD on preintervention, three weeks after intervention and six weeks after intervention for group A and group B is shown in (Table/Fig 4). An equal variance t-test reveals high statistical difference between the mean values of IRD postintervention i.e., on 6th week between group A and group B (Table/Fig 4).

(Table/Fig 5) shows the comparison of mean value of pain and IRD evaluation scores at preintervention, 3rd week of intervention and 6th week after intervention within group A and group B. For group A, the t-value at 95% level of significance of pre vs 3rd week, pre vs 6th week and 3rd week vs 6th week was 32.716, 21.269 and 14.553, respectively which reveals that there was significant improvement in pain of an individual after the administration of an intervention. For group B, the t-value at 95% level of significance of pre vs 3rd week, pre vs 6th week and 3rd week vs 6th week was 17.105, 15.411 and 7.130, respectively which also shows significant improvement in pain of the subjects.

For group A, the t-value at 95% level of significance of pre vs 3rd week, pre vs 6th week and 3rd week vs 6th week was 8.208, 8.491 and 6.558, respectively which reveals that there was significant improvement in IRD of an individual after the administration of an intervention. For group B, the t-value at 95% level of significance of pre vs 3rd week, pre vs 6th week and 3rd week vs 6th week was 7.373, 10.823 and 7.285, respectively which also shows significant improvement in IRD of the subjects (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The study was designed to explore effect of kinesio taping on pain and IRD among females with postpartum back pain and to our knowledge there is limited Randomised Control Trials (RCT) investigating the role of kinesio tape in IRD leading to diastatsis recti. Within the group analysis also showed improved but significant improvement was observed in between the groups and also there was no side-effects reported during this six week of duration. The intensity of pain and IRD showed improvement over the duration of the study in experimental group receiving kinesio tape along with the conventional physiotherapy. The mean and SD at preintervention, 3 weeks after intervention and 6 weeks after intervention for group A for pain showed improvement from 13.75±1.916, 10.50±1.878 upto 3.75±0.786, respectively whereas in group B, the mean and SD value of pain showed less improvement from 14.90±2.532, 12.05±2.373 and 9.90±1.971 at preintervention, three weeks after intervention and six weeks after intervention, respectively. The result of the study was in accordance with Sabbour A and Omar H who concluded that kinesio tape along with pelvic tilting exercises is an effective treatment of back pain during late pregnancy (18).

Moreover, it was also stated by another study by Hwang G and Lee J that continuous application of kinesio tape around the trunk may act as an additional treatment method for acute LBP (19). The result of the current study can be explained by the physiology it adopts by reducing acute or chronic spasm in the muscles and pain by supporting fascia and aligning the tissues in the desired position which inturn increases the stimulation of the mechano receptors to either activate or limit the movement, lifting the skin over the fascia and removes pressure over the lymphatic channels and removes exudates (20). However, the result of the study was also in accordance with the study by Mohamed E et al., who stated that kinesio tape along with exercise are important modalities for treating scoliosis with decrease need for brace (21). The significant improvement in the postpartum back pain can be summarised as decreasing pain sensation through improving lymphatic and blood circulation and also stimulating the proprioceptors, normalising the function of muscle and support of ligaments, which are important aspects in the muscle tone and improving postural sense thus reducing pain (20). There is also dearth of studies which could find the association of IRD to LBP and limited literature present to find out the effective protocol for treating it.

In this study, the effectiveness of a novel intervention in women with increased IRD was assessed although there has been only limited research on studying the combined effects of kinesio and exercise in reducing IRD. The major concern with the increase in IRD which leads to Diastasis Recti is unawareness among many women and this was seen by Rajkowska N and Szumilewicz A research in which it was stated that a large proportion of women did not knew the problems caused by increased in the IRD leading to Diastasis Recti (22). The mean and SD at preintervention, three weeks after intervention and six weeks after intervention for group A was improved from 28.37±0.802, 28.16±0.827 to 27.38±1.01, respectively. In group B, the mean and SD value of IRD was 28.56±0.824, 28.55±0.825 and 28.52±0.823 at preintervention, three weeks after intervention and six weeks after intervention, respectively.

The result of the study was in accordance with the study conducted by Bobowik and Dabek A which they stated that the program consisting of exercises, education and kinesio tape was effective in 95% of the women in the exercise group (p<0.0001) in the postpartum period (23). Ng Hung Shin PB et al., in their study found the effect of elevation of head with the tension created on the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles on the IRD of women who exercised with the head elevated and found out that the diastasis was smaller by as much as 15% (24). This led to the conclusion that proper muscle tone of the pelvic floor and Transverse Abdominis (TrA) reduces the size of the diastasis of the abdominal muscles (24).

Limitation(s)

The sample size of the study was small and there was no follow-up done to keep record of the sustainability of the treatment.

Conclusion

Present results demonstrated that kinesio taping improved pain and IRD in women with postpartum LBP indicating increased facilitation of the abdominal muscles and thus kinesio taping along with abdominal exercises might act as an effective exercise protocol in its management. This study will help clinicians in designing exercise training protocols for women suffering from postpartum LBP and Diastatsis Recti. However, there is need for more studies to investigate the effect of Kinesio Taping on a larger sample to validate the current findings.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank all the participants who participated in this study.

References

1.
Mota MJ, Cardoso M, Carvalho A, Marques A, Sá-Couto P, Demain S. Women's experiences of low back pain during pregnancy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(2):351-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Abebe E, Singh K, Adefires M, Abraha M. History of low back pain during previous pregnancy had an effect on development of low back pain in current pregnancy attending antenatal care clinic of the university of Gondar hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Jour of Med Sc Tech. 2014;3(3):37-44.
3.
Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB. Previous back pain and risk of developing back pain in a future pregnancy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(4):432-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Physical activity and the risk of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2014;25:331-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Gutke A, Boissonnault J, Brook G, Stuge B. The severity and impact of pelvic girdle pain and low-back pain in pregnancy: A multinational study. J Women Health. 2017;27(4):510-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Darryl B, Sneag A, Bendo JA. Pregnancy-related low back pain. Orthopedics. 2007;30:830-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: A review. Pain Pract. 2010;10:60-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Casagrande D, Gugala Z, Clark SM, Lindsey RW. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:539-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. European Spine Journal. 2008;17(6):794-819. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Ireland ML, Ott SM. The Effect of Pregnancy on the musculoskeletal System. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. 2000;372:169-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Bursch SG. Interrater reliability of diastasis recti abdominis measurement. Phys Ther. 1987;67(7):1077-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Boissonnault J, Blaschak M. Incidence of diastasis recti abdominis during the childbearing year. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1082-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Chiarello CM. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain and diastasis rectus abdominis. J Women's Health Phys Ther. 2017;41(1):03-09. [crossref]
14.
Fernandes da Mota PG, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, Bø K. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum, and relationship with lumbo-pelvic pain. Manual Therapy. 2015;20(1):200-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Tuttle LJ, Fasching J, Keller A, Patel M, Saville C, Schlaff R, et al. Noninvasive treatment of postpartum diastasis recti abdominis: A pilot study. Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy. 2018;42(2):01-11. [crossref]
16.
Benjamin DR, Van de water AT, Peiris CL. Effect of exercises on Diastasis of rectus abdomini muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(1):01-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. Spine. 1998;23(18):2003-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Sabbour A, Omar H. The Effect of kinesiotaping therapy augmented with pelvic tilting exercises on low back pain in primigravidas during the third trimester. Bull Fac Ph Th Cairo Univ. 2011;16(1):53-61.
19.
Hwang G, Lee J. Effects of kinesio taping in a physical therapist with acute low back pain due to patient handling: A case report International. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2011;24(3):320-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical therapeutic applications of the kinesio taping method (2nd edition). Tokyo, Japan: Ken Ikai Co. Ltd.; 2003.
21.
Mohamed E, Elasab D, Hamed H. Effect of therapeutic exercises augmented by kinesio tape in treatment of scoliosis in adolescent females. IJMH. 2016;5:326-32.
22.
Rajkowska N, Szumilewicz A. Prenatal abdominal exercises in the opinions of pregnant women and young mothers. Scientific Yearbook, AWFiS in Gdańsk. 2014.
23.
Bobowik PZ, Dabek A. Physiotherapy in women with diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles. Advances in Rehabilitation. 2018;(3):11-17. [crossref]
24.
Ng Hung Shin PB, Osmotherly PG, Chiarelli P. Pre-activation of transversus abdominis protects the rectus abdominis diastasis of postpartum women doing a head lift. Proceedings of APA Conference Week 1-5, Continence and Women's Health Physiotherapy Australia; 2009; Sydney Convention Centre, Australia.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51643.15975

Date of Submission: Jul 29, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 20, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 29, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 30, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 27, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 30, 2022 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com