Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 104556

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : OC32 - OC35 Full Version

Effects of Efavirenz for the Treatment of HIV on the Basis of Genetic Polymorphisms


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52614.16261
Brighty Elizabeth Kurian, Swamy Miryala, Srikrishna Raghavendra Boddu

1. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Srikrishna Raghavendra Boddu,
1-2-234/11, HarshaKrishna Villa, New SBH Colony, Gaganmahal Domalguda,
Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
E-mail: krishna030@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The CYP2B6 is a liver enzyme that is involved in the metabolism of several drugs including Efavirenz, which is one of the mainstay treatments for Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Polymorphisms in the CYP2B6 gene determines the rate of enzyme activity. One such polymorphism, rs3745274, where there is a change from G to T at codon 516 results in an amino acid change from glutamine to histidine at position 172. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) USA has recommended this molecular marker as a companion diagnostic test for Efavirenz.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of Efavirenz in the treatment of HIV on the basis of genetic polymorphisms, to determine the CYP2B6 genotype of healthy individuals and those with HIV before starting the antiretroviral therapy, to review the reported cases of genetic polymorphisms and document drug toxicity in the selected population.

Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical observational study was done at Kamineni Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, from September 2017 to August 2020 with an inclusion criterion of participants above the age of 18 years who were HIV positive diagnosed by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test, reporting to the Outpatient Department (OPD) or getting admitted for treatment with Efavirenz with a sample size of 369 based on the prevalence of CYP2B6 polymorphism in Southern India.

Results: Out of the study population, 276 HIV patients and 93 controls were genotyped by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and subjected to Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) technique to establish CYP2B6-516 G>T polymorphism. About 69% were of GT genotype, 18% were of TT genotype and 13% is of GG genotype. Patients with GT genotype were intermediate metabolisers of the drug, those with TT genotype were poor metabolisers of the drug, and GG genotype was an extensive metaboliser of the drug. Individuals with the 516T allele had low enzyme activity and were poor metabolisers of the drug, causing delayed clearance leading to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) causing neurological deficits and cardiac complications.

Conclusion: This observation helps the clinician adjust the dose of Efavirenz by studying the genetic polymorphism of the patient. Based on this study, we recommend that all HIV diagnosed patients should undergo CYP2B6 genotyping before starting an Efavirenz based regimen to decrease the adverse drug reactions and promote effective Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) therapy.

Keywords

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Highly active antiretroviral therapy, Human immunodeficiency virus

Human immunodeficiency virus weakens the immune system of the individual and its defence against infections. Helper T cell count usually measures immune function. The stage of advanced disease is Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and it may take a few years to develop if not treated, depending on the individual.

The first few weeks after the infection, people are asymptomatic or have an influenza-like illness which includes fever, headache, rash, or sore throat. As the disease prolongs there is a progressive weakening of the immune system, then they develop other signs and symptoms, like fever, weight loss, lymphadenopathy, cough and diarrhoea.

Efavirenz (EFV), a Non nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI), is commonly used as the first line Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) for HIV globally, particularly in developing countries, owing to its excellent efficacy (1). World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends Efavirenz in combination with lamivudine and tenofovir as first line antiretroviral treatment (2).

Genetic polymorphism is a distinction in Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) sequence among individuals, races, groups, or ethnicity. Genetic polymorphism of enzymes plays a crucial role in inter individual variations in clinical practice, essential for routine drug prescription (3).

World Health Organisation posited that HIV is a significant public health challenge affecting 33 million lives globally. However, with increased research and effective therapy schedules and plan for HIV treatment and care, it has become a manageable chronic health condition, and enables individuals living with HIV to lead a healthy and longer life span.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP2) B6 is the main part constituent for Efavirenz metabolism, with including accessory pathways involving CYP2A6 and occasionally CYP3A4/5 (4). Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) and Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR) are nuclear receptor genes that transcriptionally regulate CYP genes (5). Efavirenz is glucuronidated by uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 directly (6). Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNPs) in the genes that encode these enzymes, especially CYP2B6, will predict higher plasma Efavirenz concentrations (7). Variations in the enzyme activity due to gene polymorphisms can affect the individual’s drug response and can result in adverse drug reactions (8). The CYP2B6 SNP causing increased plasma Efavirenz concentrations have been already documented, which is related to CNS adverse effects. The present study was conducted with an objective to evaluate the effect of Efavirenz in the treatment of HIV on the basis of genetic polymorphisms. The rationale behind the present study lies in the fact that limited studies till date have been conducted to analyse the association between HIV treatment and genetic polymorphism.

Study objectives:

• To determine the CYP2B6 genotype of healthy individuals in our population and those with HIV before starting the antiretroviral therapy.
• To review reported cases of genetic polymorphisms among the antiretrovirals, especially Efavirenz in HIV patients, and also document drug toxicity of Efavirenz in the selected population.

Material and Methods

A prospective clinical observational study was done at Kamineni Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India from September 2017 to August 2020 with the clearance of Institutional Ethics Committee (Registration No. ECR-58/ Inst/ AP/ 2013/ RR-16) and a sample size of 369, based on the prevalence of CYP2B6 polymorphism in Southern India. Out of the 369-sample size, 276 were HIV positive patients, and 93 were controls. And 207 were males with a mean age of 51 years; 162 were females with a mean age of 45 years.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Participants above the age of 18 years who are HIV positive diagnosed by ELISA test, reporting to the OPD, or getting admitted for treatment on Efavirenz patients who were not willing to participate in the study were excluded.

Study Procedure

All 369 patients enrolled in the study were subjected to PCR-RFLP techinique to establish CYP2B6-516 G>T polymorphism. Out of them 276 were HIV patients and 93 were healthy controls. The study strength were subjected to this technique to maintain the gene haplotype throughout which varied according to the ethnicity. Blood investigations including liver function tests (SGPT,SGOT, cholesterol and triglycerides) and CD4 count tests were done along with assessment of CNS symptoms (hallucinations, insomnia) to find out the association between genotypes and effect of Efavirenz.

Literature Review Methodology

A literature review is defined as academic writing that incorporates current knowledge on a topic, theories, findings, and methodologies (9). This literature review will provide knowledge on the effect of Efavirenz in the treatment of HIV with the help of genetic polymorphisms based on the primary aim and objective. The objective was to determine how much research has carried out on the effect of Efavirenz on HIV treatment considering genetic polymorphisms.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are used in the elimination and selection of publications (10). Limiters were applied to the literature review. The articles were limited to 2010-2018 to give current research and differentiate between relevant and irrelevant articles. Screening of the articles was achieved using titles and abstracts relevant to the literature review. Primary research studies were specifically related to HIV and genetic polymorphs. Excluded were the articles without the year of publication and reports not written in the English language since translation would be beyond the scope of the literature review.

Results

Out of the study population, the T-Allele frequency obtained from the sample is 49.07%, and G-Allele was 25.47% (Table/Fig 1). Allele frequency from the samples does not follow Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. In the present study population 66 participants out of 369 were TT genotypes who had two copies of T allele each. Thus, in the present study frequency of T allele was 132. Similarly for GG genotype (n=48) the allele frequency was 96.

Total 276 HIV patients and 93 controls were genotyped by using PCR and then subjected to Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique to establish CYP2B6 - 516 G>T polymorphism - 69% GT, 18% TT and 13% GG Polymorphisms. This is explained as follows - 255 were found to be of G/T genotype, 66 of T/T genotype, and 48 of G/G genotype in the study population.

Of the study population of 369, with 66 being T/T genotypes, 2.6% showed hallucinations, and 24% reported insomnia. 19% and 13% of the T/T genotype had deranged Aminotransferases {Glutamic Oxalacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)}. Elevated cholesterol levels were seen in 3316% of the total T/T genotype, along with 11% showing deranged Triglycerides and 12% were showing a decreased change in CD4 cell counts (Table/Fig 1).

Similarly, within the study population of 369, with 255 being G/T genotypes, no person showed hallucinations, and only 8% reported insomnia. About 4% and 5% of the G/T genotype were having deranged Aminotransferases (SGPT and SGOT). Elevated cholesterol levels were seen in 5% of total G/T genotype, 9% showing deranged Triglycerides, and 15% showing a decreased change in CD4 cell counts (Table/Fig 2).

But when it came to G/G genotype, which was 13% in the study population (48), there were no reported hallucinations, insomnia, deranged liver enzymes, deranged lipid profile or change in the CD4 cell counts. Deranged triglycerides were seen in 9% of G/T genotype and 11% of T/T genotype, denoting no significant difference among the different genotypes. Also, there is a considerable decrease in CD4 cell count in T/T genotype compared to G/T genotype (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

The EFV is associated with several side effects, mainly in the Central Nervous System (CNS). The use of EFV may end in increased neurocognitive effects compared with other antiretroviral drugs (11). Increased risk of side effects from EFV is associated with genetic polymorphisms in the CYP2B6 gene (12). Variability in response to EFV is due to the difference in the expression and function of CYP2B6 (12). Increased plasma concentrations of the drug and the neuropsychiatric effects of EFV are due to CYP2B6 516 G>T polymorphism (12).

Approximately 80% of Efavirenz is metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system, of which the phase 1 metabolism isoforms CYP1A2 (8.9%), CYP2C19 (6.8%), CYP2C9 (12.8%), CYP3A4/CYP3A5 (30.2%), and CYP2D6 (20%) are the most important. Each CYP450 enzyme is encoded by a selected gene, which successively is decided by inherited alleles- one from each parent. Alleles contribute to the observable characteristics known as the individual’s phenotype and may either be dominant or recessive (13). When heterozygous alleles are present, the dominant allele will determine the phenotype.

A study was conducted in Brazil on CYP2B6 516 G>T polymorphism and the CNS side effects in all HIV-positive individuals on Efavirenz treatment (14). From a study, 225 HIV-positive individuals were prescribed Efavirenz and other medications at a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Eighty-nine cases showed adverse effects of which 43 were with CNS system and 136 controls had none after a minimum treatment of six months. A total of 67 genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP 3A5, NR1I2 and NR1I3 were selected for the analysis. The analysis showed increased all cause adverse effects related to the CYP2B6 genotype combination 15582CC-516TT-983TT and with the CYP2B6 slow metaboliser group 516TT or 516GT-983CT with an Odd’s Ratio equalling to 3.10, and with p-value significance 0.04; CNS adverse effects were nominally related to CYP3A4 rs4646437 with an Odd’s Ratio of 4.63, and with p-value significance of 0.014 but without adjusting multiple comparisons.

Another study was done on how genetic polymorphism influences CD4 T cell count in an HIV positive patients who were on antiretroviral therapy in an ethnical region of the Amazon (15). The CYP2B6 genotyping was performed by RT-PCR (real-time PCR) in 185 patient samples. CYP2B6 G516T allele frequency was 0.36 and varied from the other ethnic groups. The polymorphism seems to have a effect on the response to Efavirenz treatment by reducing CD4+ T cell counts in patients with a high degree of interbreeding of different ethnic genes who used this antiretroviral agent.

Efavirenz crosses the blood brain barrier attaining Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) concentrations of 0.5-1.2% corresponding with its plasma concentrations, reaching a therapeutic level in the brain (16). Research has shown higher rates of neuropsychiatric side effects due to Efavirenz during the first three to four weeks of therapy, including insomnia, vivid dreams, and mood changes and these symptoms lead to discontinuation of the drug by the patients. The plasma levels of Efavirenz over 4 mg/mL have been associated with high toxicity in the central nervous system and when the levels were below 1 mg/mL,
it resulted in increase in virological failure of the disease (17).

An increase in half-life of Efavirenz also increases the risk of developing resistance to the drug if it is used as all other ART components. In one study, the polymorphism is associated with CNS toxicities and varying Efavirenz plasma levels, suggesting that prescription of lower dose of the drug in patients presenting T/T genotype could ensure decreased side effects without compromising drug efficacy (18). However, another study found absolutely no correlation between the plasma levels of the drug and neurotoxicity. Combined drug monitoring for its adverse effects and the genotyping of CYP2B6 has been proposed to decrease viral resistance and toxicity (3).

Genetic polymorphisms of P glycoprotein (P-gp) have been widely studied hence Multidrug Resistance protein 1 (MDR1).3435 C>T and 2677 G>T/A are significantly associated with reduced expression of the protein and several such researches also suggest that these polymorphisms could be related to decreased EFV levels though the results were not conclusive (19). One study states that though MDR1 variations have been significantly associated with Efavirenz resistance, managing exposure to these levels is not the only pharmacological determinant of resistance, indicating requirement of further studies to show the mechanism by which MDR1 polymorphism work for the virologic response (3).

The ENCORE1 study suggests that the use of a reduced dose universally is non inferior to the standard dose, and the study provides evidence that the dose individualisation based on the genotype can potentially cause a successful viral suppression without unwanted CNS effects which can result in improved outcomes of the patients (20). Based on the availability of Efavirenz drug in the markets only 200 mg and 600 mg tablets, GG genotype patients can continue their 600 mg daily, whereas TT patients can be asked to take only 200 mg daily. GT patients can take 400 (2×200) mg daily (Table/Fig 3).

However, using these individualised methods through genotyping and supplying reduced dose of Efavirenz while prescribing co-formulations of other nucleoside polymerase inhibitors for a good virological response become a significant inconvenience to the patient and therefore, the implementation of the reduced strength of Efavirenz remains challenging.

Limitation(s)

As a single tertiary care centre study, we cannot extrapolate our results to the general population.

Conclusion

The CYP2B6 enzyme is Important for drug metabolism, and its activity shows an inter-individual variability due to polymorphisms. The CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism affects the response to several drugs, including Efavirenz used for the treatment of HIV. Individuals with the 516T allele have low enzyme activity and are poor metabolisers of the drug, causing delayed clearance leading to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR). From the population analysed for the study, the T allele frequency was higher (0.49) than G (0.25) allele in our study population. HIV patients who have T-allele shows drug-related toxicity more than those who have G-allele. Hence, based on the study, we recommend that patients undergo CYP2B6 genotyping before starting the Efavirenz-based regimen. Larger sample sizes and more trials with the same principle will validate the necessity of using CYP2B6 genotyping as a companion diagnostic test before treating patients with Efavirenz in India.

References

1.
Bock P, Fatti G, Grimwood A. Comparing the effectiveness of Efavirenz and nevirapine for first-line antiretroviral therapy in a South African multicenter cohort. International health. 2013;5(2):132-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
WHO (2016) Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach? http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/208825/9789241549684_eng.pdf?sequence=1 .18 March 2021. World Health Organization (2020) HIV/AIDS Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids Accessed: 12 March 2021.
3.
Haas W, Smeaton M, Shafer R, Robbins K, Morse D, Labbe L. Pharmacogenetics of long-term responses to antiretroviral regimens containing Efavirenz and Nelfinavir: An Adult Aids Clinical Trials Group Study. J Infect Dis. 2010;192(11):1931-34. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/497610. Accessed 15 March 2021. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Ward BA, Gorski JC, Jones DR, Hall SD, Flockhart DA, Desta Z. The cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) is the main catalyst of efavirenz primary and secondary metabolism: Implication for HIV/AIDS therapy and utility of Efavirenz as a substrate marker of CYP2B6 catalytic activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;306(1):287-300. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Ogburn ET, Jones DR, Masters AR, Xu C, Guo Y, Desta Z. Efavirenz primary and secondary metabolism in vitro and in vivo: Identification of novel metabolic pathways and cytochrome P450 2A6 as the principal catalyst of efavirenz 7-hydroxylation. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(7):1218-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Bélanger AS, Caron P, Harvey M, Zimmerman PA, Mehlotra RK, Guillemette C. Glucuronidation of the antiretroviral drug efavirenz by UGT2B7 and an in vitro investigation of drug-drug interaction with zidovudine. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37(9):1793-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Haas DW, Ribaudo HJ, Kim RB, Tierney C, Wilkinson GR, Gulick RM. Pharmacogenetics of Efavirenz and central nervous system side effects: An Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group study. AIDS. 2004;18(18);2391-4000.
8.
C¡??olic´?? A, Alessandrini M, Pepper MS. Pharmacogenetics of CYP2B6, CYP2A6 and UGT2B7 in HIV treatment in African populations: Focus on Efavirenz and nevirapine. Drug Metab Rev. 2015;47(2):111-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Moore C, Mc Cabe T. (2016) How to write a literature review. Retrieved at https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/_fileupload/Research/Literature-Review-Webinar.pdf. Accessed 18 March 2021.
10.
Hulley B, Cummings R, Browner S, Grady D, Newman T. (2017) Designing Clinical Research. 3rd ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia, PA.
11.
Ma Q, Vaida F, Wong J, Sanders CA, Kao YT, Croteau D. CHARTER Group. Longterm efavirenz use is associated with worse neurocognitive functioning in HIVinfected patients. J Neurovirol. 2016;22(2):170-78. Doi: 10.1007/s13365-015-0382-7. Epub 2015 25 September. PMID: 26407716; PMCID: PMC4783211. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Gounden V, van Niekerk C, Snyman T, George JA. The CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism increased the plasma Efavirenz concentrations and early neuropsychiatric side effects in South African HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Ther. 2010;7:32. Doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-7-32. PMID: 20723261; PMCID: PMC2933581. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Cotterman W. Regular two-allele and three-allele phenotype systems. Am J Hum Genet. 1953;5(3):193-235.
14.
Müller T, Ellwanger JH, Michita RT, Matte MCC, Renner JDP. CYP2B6 516 G>T polymorphism and side effects of the central nervous system in HIV-positive individuals under Efavirenz treatment: Study of a sample from southern Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017;89(1 Suppl 0):497-504. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Maria A, Rogerio V, Ednelza A, Mauro S, Samara T, Lima S, et al. The CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism influences CD4+ T-cell counts in HIV-positive patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in an ethnically diverse region of the Amazon International Journal Of Infectious Disease. 2017;55(17):04-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Tashima KT, Caliendo AM, Ahmad M, Gormley JM, Fiske WD, Brennan JM et al. Cerebrospinal fluid human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) suppression and efavirenz drug concentrations in HIV-1-infected patients receiving combination therapy. J Infect Dis. 2010;180(11):862-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Kenedi A, Goforth W. A systematic review of the psychiatric side-effects of Efavirenz. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(9):1803-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Rodriguez N, Barrerio P, Nacher S. Overview of the pharmacogenetics of HIV therapy. Pharmacogenomics J. 2011;6(4):234-45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.tpj.6500374 . Accessed 18 March 2021. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sanchez CA, Medrano J, Labarga P, Vispo E, Calviño A, Martín-Carbonero L. Efficacy and safety of TDF+FTC+EFV in naïve patients initiating HAART; an observational study was comparing Atripla Vs Truvada/Sustiva exposure. Retrovirology. 2010;7(Suppl 1):P51. 7. 10.1186/1742-4690-7-S1-P51. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
ENCORE1 Study Group. Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1474-82. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62187-X. Epub 2014 10 February. Erratum in: Lancet. 2014 26 April;383(9927):1464. PMID: 24522178. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52614.16261

Date of Submission: Sep 28, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Jan 11, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 29, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jan 31, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Feb 11, 2022 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com