Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 39329

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : May | Volume : 16 | Issue : 5 | Page : MC10 - MC14 Full Version

Morphometric Analysis of External Ear to Estimate the Stature and Sexual Dimorphism in North Indians: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: May 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/50599.16398
Archana Kumari, Deepa Devadas, Jitendra Kumar Patel, Raghunath S More, Pooja Dubey, Khusboo Kumari

1. Junior Resident, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Research Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Research Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 6. Research Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Raghunath S More,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: psychiatry.more@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Anthropometry is an essential technique to understand the variations in the human body that is implicated during various reconstructive surgical procedures, and for the identification of individual during crime scene in forensics. Analysis of ear morphology plays a role in understanding the sexual dimorphism and stature in the human population. It has been found that the ear morphology changes from one region to another.

Aim: To study the morphometric parameters of external ear for stature estimation, and to identify sexual dimorphism in north Indian population.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 subjects (100 males and 100 females) aged 17-25 years in the Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study participants were selected from the medical, dental and nursing undergraduates studying in Banaras Hindu University (BHU). The various aspects of ear morphology (ear length, ear width, lobule length, lobule width) were measured. Student’s t-test, Karl Pearson’s Coefficient of Correlation and Linear regression equation were calculated.

Results: The mean age for males were 19.17 years and females were 19.52 years. Measurements for ear length, width and lobule width of both ears were higher in males than females. The mean right and left ear length in males were 60.77±3.74 and 59.99±3.83 mm, and that for females were 56.59±3.044 and 55.55±3.68 mm, respectively. The mean right and left ear width in males were 30.60±2.81 and 30.81±2.69 mm and that for females, the values of ear width for right and left ears were 28.55±3.12 and 28.81±2.80 mm, respectively. A strong correlation between right and left ear length and stature in females were observed using linear regression coefficient analysis. The correlation coefficient between stature to right and left ear length in females were 0.55 and 0.51, respectively (p-value=0.030).

Conclusion: Ear length and width, and lobule width of the right and left ears were significantly higher in males. There were no significant differences observed in lobule length. There was a strong correlation between the stature and right and left ear length in females, moderate strength of association was seen in stature with ear width and lobule length in females.

Keywords

Anthropometry, Ear lobule, Forensic science, Plastic surgery

Anthropometry refers to the measurements of living human body dimensions to understand human physical variation. Anthropometric measurements play an important role in plastic surgery, and prosthetics (1),(2). Personal identification means a determination of individuality based on certain morphological criteria unique to that individual. In the case of skeletal remains, identification is more complicated and requires accurate examination of these remains (3). In humans, the ear is the most defining feature of the face and its structure shows the signs of age and sex (4). The study of the morphological parameters of the ear like ear length, width as well as measurements of ear lobular length and width can serve as useful tools for estimation of stature and sexual dimorphism (5),(6).

The external ear constitutes certain distinctive design features and peculiarities, similar to fingerprints (7). The size, shape and spatial location of the ear also contribute to the aesthetics of the face (8),(9). The appearance and symmetry of the auricle are essential for facial harmony. The anatomical appearance of the auricle varies from individual to individual and between ethnic races (10). The shape, size and orientation of each external ear is specific (11). Features of auricle have been recognised as an important anthropological variable for studying racial variability and for a few genetic abnormalities at an early stage of life (12).

The use of ear morphology and the variations created by its anatomical form are implemented principally for the identification of perpetrators concerning criminal activity (13). The auricle has been utilised as useful tool by physicians to detect underlying pathologies, by psychologists to provide clues for personality disorders and by criminologists for racial differentiation (14). As ear morphology tends to be hereditary, ear characteristics may be used for assessment of familial relationships (15). The external ear is made up of auricle and external acoustic meatus which is utilised in forensic science, for individual identification and authentication (16). The shape of the ear is fixed since birth and never changes unless there is physical trauma/congenital abnormalities (17).

According to Altmann, the free lobule of the ear is a dominant trait, whereas the attached part of the ear lobule is a recessive trait (18). The ear morphology and biometric measurements may be used for the identification of bodies in any crime scene (19),(20). It was also shown that in comparison to Caucasian and Japanese populations, the Indian population has smaller ear dimensions morphometrically (21),(22). For forensic investigations, reference databases on ethnic groups are required. People having an abnormal set of ears due to either congenital or acquired causes can undergo corrective surgery, according to the normal measurements based on their ethinicity (23). For rectifying such abnormalities, plastic surgeons require information about normal auricular dimensions, auricle bilateral position on the face, the general conformations and its variation. However, this auricular data varies in different ethnic groups (24),(25).

Hence, the present research aimed to study the morphometry of the ear for stature estimation and to identify sexual dimorphism in the northern Indian region of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. This data may be helpful for forensic experts and cosmetic surgeons.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 subjects (100 males and 100 females) in the Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India from October 2018 to July 2020. Purposive sampling was followed, and the first year professional students of the MBBS, BDS and Nursing undergraduates were included. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, IMS, BHU (No. Dean/2018/EC/939).

Inclusion criteria: Participants aged between 17-25 years, who were residents of Northern India with parents origin from the same regions were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those participants having obvious deformity of the ear either congenital or acquired were excluded from the study.

Procedure

The procedure and purpose of the study was explained to the students, thereafter consent was taken from them. The basic information of the students was collected like- age, sex, Unmarried, Local Residents of Varanasi. Students were made to relax and sit on a chair with their heads in anatomical positions. A total of five parameters were recorded, that is, the height of the individual, ear length, ear breadth, lobule length, and lobule breadth.

Anthropometric measurements: All the measurements were taken in a well-lit and ventilated room, by one observer to avoid an inter-observer error. Digital Vernier calliper (Aerospace R) for ear measurements and steel tape roll for height measurements were used. All the measurements were taken between 2.00 to 4.30 pm. Standardised measurements of the ear pinna were taken according to the landmarked points for accurate measurement, defined by DeCarlo LT and the methodology was adopted from those stated by Garba SH and Brucker P et al., (26),(27),(28).

Parameters:

1. Stature: Stature was measured as a vertical distance from the vertex to the floor using a standard anthropometric Frankfurt plane (29).
2. Total ear length: Distance between the highest point of the auricle and the lowest point of the ear lobe.
3. Ear width: Distance between the most anterior and posterior points.
4. Lobule length: Distance from the intertragicincisure to the caudal part of the lobule.
5. Lobule width: Horizontal width of the lobule at the midpoint of the lobular height.
Total ear length: (A-B)=

Highest point of the auricle- Lowest point of the ear lobe

Most anterior point of the auricle-Most posterior point of the auricle

Statistical Analysis

All the data was entered in Microsoft excel sheet 2007. Analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). Student’s ‘t-test’ was applied as a test of significance. The p-value <0.05 was taken as a statistically significant difference. Karl Pearson’s Coefficient of Correlation was used to check the strength of correlation. Analysis was done in the form of male to male, female to female and male to female comparison. A linear regression equation was calculated.

Results

Total 200 (100 males and 100 females) participated in the study voluntarily. The mean age of the male and female participants were 19.17±1.11 years and 19.52±1.45 years, respectively. The two-tailed p-value was 0.057 (Table/Fig 1), which was not a significant difference. The mean length and width of the right and left ears in males was found to be 60.77±3.74 mm, 30.60±2.81 mm and 59.99±3.83 mm, 30.81±2.69 mm, respectively; and in females was 56.59±3.04 mm, 28.55±3.12 mm and 55.55±3.68 mm, 28.81±2.80 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean values of right and left ear length (p-value=0.148), and width (p-value=0.584) in males, but in females it showed a significant difference (p-value=0.030). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the right and left ear width (p-value=0.542) (Table/Fig 2).

No statistically significant difference was observed between right and left ear lobule lengths (p-value=0.094), which were found to be 16.48±2.37 mm and 17.04±2.30 mm, respectively in males. Measurements of the right and left ear lobule widths were 18.21±2.75 mm and 18.08±2.31 mm, and were statistically insignificant (p-value=0.735) in males. The right and left ear lobule length and width of females were 15.97±1.77 mm, 16.53±1.57 mm, (p-value=0.019) and 15.93±2.18 mm, 16.31±2.10 mm, showed no significant difference (p-value=0.212), respectively (Table/Fig 3).

The correlation coefficient between stature and right and left length was found to be 0.22 and 0.23 in males, and 0.55 and 0.51 in females, respectively. Correlation coefficient values for right and left ear widths were found to be 0.10 and 0.23 in males, and 0.39 and 0.24 in females. This is suggestive of a significant correlation between stature and right and left ear lengths in females (Table/Fig 4). Similarly, the correlation coefficient between stature and right and left ear lobule length and width was significant in females (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

This study aimed to provide an insight that can strengthen the medical and judiciary system. The study was carried out on 200 individuals, to find the correlation between stature and four ear parameters i.e., ear length, ear breadth, ear lobule length, and ear lobule breadth. A strong correlation was observed between the stature and ear lengths of both ears in females (R=0.5) as compared to males. Moderate strength of association was seen in stature with ear width and lobule length in females.

(Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7) discuss the findings of the present study (ear length and width and ear lobule length and width) with the findings of other research workers (6),(29),(30),(31),(32),(33),(34),(35),(36).

The mean value of right and left ear length observed in males was 60.77±3.74, 59.99±3.83 mm and in females 56.59±3.044, 55.55±3.69 mm, respectively. Similar findings have been observed in the South Indian population, as well as in North Indian population (Table/Fig 6) (29),(30),(31),(32). In the present study, regression equation was calculated for stature estimation in males for right ear lobule width and the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.16 with Standard Error of Estimation (SEE) ±6.56 (Table/Fig 7).

The findings differ from a study done in Tamil Nadu by Srijith and Murugan M which reported a correlation coefficient of 0.97. with SEE 1.83 (35). A study done in the Egyptian population by Abdelaleem S and Abdelbaky FF reported a correlation coefficient of 0.829 with SEE 3.37, which again differs from the present study (Table/Fig 6) (36).

In the present study, in females, regression equation for stature estimation with respect to right ear lobule width shows the correlation coefficient 0.220 with SEE 5.96, and that for left ear lobule width correlation coefficient 0.398 with SEE 5.6 (Table/Fig 5). These findings differ from those of Srijith and Murugan M, and Abdelaleem S and Abdelbaky FF, who reported correlation coefficient of 0.98 with SEE 1.76, and correlation coefficient of 0.806 with SEE 4.98, respectively (35),(36). In this study, the regression constant was higher but the regression coefficient was found to be lower than those by Srijith and Murugan M, and Abdelaleem S and Abdelbaky FF (Table/Fig 7) (35),(36). This highlights the regional differences.

Linear regression equations for stature estimation was calculated using all the mentioned variables. These regression equations were checked for their accuracy by comparing the estimated stature and actual stature.

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted on a limited number of participants. Study of a larger group may provide additional information and give further insight regarding ear morphometric correlation with stature. Measurements obtained may have been subjected to inter-observer variation. As this study was done exclusively on participants with ethnic origin from north India, variations in other ethnic groups were not assessed. These may be studied to get additional information regarding morphometric correlation of stature with ear dimensions in other populations.

Conclusion

There was a significant correlation between stature and ear parameters such as ear length, width as well as lobular length and width. This positive correlation has been observed to be more significant about the stature estimation of females. In this regard, it may be thus concluded that ear parameters may serve as a useful tool for the determination of sexual dimorphism in case of unknown identity.

References

1.
Singhal J, Sharma N, Jain SK, Budhiraja V, Rastogi R, Garg R, et al. A study of auricle morphology for identification in Indians. Annals of International Medical and Dental Research. 2016;2(4):217. [crossref]
2.
Champod C, Evett IW, Kuchler B. Earmarks as evidence: A critical review. Journal of Forensic Science. 2001;46(6):1275-84. [crossref]
3.
Deopa D, Thakkar HK, Prakash C, Niranjan R, Barua MP. Anthropometric measurements of external ear of medical students in Uttarakhand region. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2013;62(1):79-83. [crossref]
4.
Jaberi KR, Kavakebian F, Mojaverrostami S, Najibi A, Safari M, Hassanzadeh G, et al. Nasofacial anthropometric study among students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran: A population based study. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 201971(2):206-11.
5.
Natekar PE, De Souza FM. Demarking and identifying points-reliable criteria for determination of sex from external ear. Indian Journal of Otology. 2012;18(1):24. [crossref]
6.
Laxman K. A study of determination of stature in hyderabad population from external ear morphometry. Medico Legal Update. 2019;19(1):164-68. [crossref]
7.
Dhanda V, Badhan JS, Garg RK. Studies on the development of latent ear prints and their significance in personal identification. Problems of Forensic Sciences. 2011;88:285-95.
8.
Sullivan PK, Brucker MJ, Patel J. A morphometric study of the external ear: Age and sex related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(2):647-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Kalra D, Kalra A, Goel S. Anthropometric measurements of external ear: An in vivo study. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Medicines & Dental Care. 2015;2(3):10-16.
10.
Purkait R, Singh P. Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: A study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2007;31(4):372-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Akpa A, Ibiam A, Ugwu C. Anthropometric study of the pinna among south East Nigerians. J of Expt Res. 2013;1:47-50.
12.
Hunter AG, Yotsuyanagi T. The external ear: More attention to detail may aid syndrome diagnosis and contribute answers to embryological questions. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2005;135(3):237-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Kapil V, Bhawana J, Vikas K. Morphological variation of ear for individual identification in forensic cases: A study of an Indian population. Res J Forensic Sci. 2014;2(1):01-08.
14.
Abbas A, Rutty GN. Ear piercing affects ear prints: The role of ear piercing in human identification. Journal of Forensic Science. 2005;50(2):JFS2003374-77. [crossref]
15.
Imhofer R. Die bedeutung der ohrmuschel fur diefeststellung der identitat. ArchivKriminol Bd. 1906;26:150-63.
16.
Sharma A, Sidhu NK, Sharma MK, Kapoor K, Singh B. Morphometric study of ear lobule in northwest Indian male subjects. Anatomical science international. 2007;82(2):98-104. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Sharma A, Kumar A, Poonam S. Age dependant changes in lobule of human ear and its influence on individual identification. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2008;2(2):07-08.
18.
Altmann F. Malformations of the auricle and the external auditory meatus: A critical review. AMA Archives of Otolaryngology. 1951;54(2):115-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sankar S. Review of various biometric authentication techniques. International Research Journal of Computer Science. 2020;07(09):250-56. [crossref]
20.
Tatlisumak E, Yavuz MS, Kutlu N, Asirdizer M, Yoleri L, Aslan A. Asimetría, Lateralidad y Morfometría de la Oreja. International Journal of Morphology. 2015;33(4):1542-48. [crossref]
21.
Purkait R. Ear biometric: An aid to personal identification. Anthropologist Special. 2007;3:215-18.
22.
Sadler TW and Jan Langman. Langman’s Medical Embryology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.
23.
Kumar BS, Selvi GP. Morphometry of ear pinna in sex determination. International Journal of Anatomy and Research. 2016;4(2):2480-84. [crossref]
24.
Osunwoke EA, Vidona WB, Atulegwu GC. Anthropometric study on the anatomical variation of the external ear amongst Port Harcourt students, Nigeria. IntJ Anat Var. 2018;11(4):143-46.
25.
Khobkhun P, Pungrasmi P, Suwajo P, Nilprapha K, Meevassana J, Promniyom P, et al. An anthropometric study of the external ear in the Thai population. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(4):1417-23. Doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.065. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
DeCarlo LT. On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological methods. 1997;2(3):292. [crossref]
27.
Garba SH. Anthropometric study of the pinna (Auricle) among adult Nigerians resident in Maiduguri metropolis. J Med Sci. 2010;10(6):176-80. [crossref]
28.
Brucker P, Drexl A, Möhring R, Neumann K, Pesch E. Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods. European journal of operational research. 1999;112(1):03-41. [crossref]
29.
Sidera S, Vrushali P. Anthropometric measurements of human external ear. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2015;59(4):10333-38. [crossref]
30.
Sangeetha S, Venkata Krishna BR. Morphometric measurements of human external ear in student population. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. 2018;6(6):970-74. [crossref]
31.
Yadav VD, Kala AC, Raj SR. Comparative assessment of external ear: Morphometric study and sexual dimorphism in medical student in SMS medical college. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. 2018;05:815-19.
32.
Nigam R, Kumar K, Kulshreshtha S. Anthropometric study of external ear in north indian population. Int J Anat Res. 2019;7(3.2):6800-03. [crossref]
33.
Japatti SR, Engineer PJ, Reddy BM, Tiwari AU, Siddegowda CY, Hammannavar RB. Anthropometric assessment of the normal adult human ear. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018;8(1):42. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Taura MG, Adamu LH, Gudaji A, Modibbo MH. Height prediction from external ear morphometry; a pilot study. Int J Res Heal Sci. 2016;4(1):15-19.
35.
Srijith, Murugan M. Estimating stature in females by using the external ear morphometry. Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine. 2019;6(3):182-87. [crossref]
36.
Abdelaleem S, Abdelbaky FF. Estimation of stature in Upper Egypt population from external ear morphometry. Int J Forensic Sci Pathol. 2016;4(10):276-84. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/50599.16398

Date of Submission: May 29, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Jul 22, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Mar 11, 2022
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 08, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 29, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com