Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 31297

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : May | Volume : 16 | Issue : 5 | Page : RC05 - RC11 Full Version

Effect of Obesity and Hypertension on Blood Loss and Blood Transfusion Requirements in Primary Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Clinical Study


Published: May 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56328.16406
Vikram Indrajit Shah, Sachin Upadhyay, Kalpesh Shah

1. Director and Head, Department of Knee and Hip Arthroplasty, Shalby Hospitals, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. 2. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Arthroplasty Surgeon, Department of Knee and Hip Arthroplasty, Shalby Hospitals, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sachin Upadhyay,
House No. 622, Poonam Sneh Nagar, State Bank Colony,
Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drsachinupadhyay@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying risk factors of operative blood loss is imperative toward establishing an effective blood management implementation strategy and further minimise the requirement for perioperative blood loss and transfusion.

Aim: To investigate whether the factors like obesity and hypertension affect blood loss and transfusion requirements in primary elective Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted at Shalby Hospitals in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, from November 2017 to November 2019, on 91 patients recruited for primary elective TKA. The subjects were divided into two groups, i.e, group A (normotensive and non obese; n=46) and group B (Hypertensive and obese; n=45). Charlson-Deyo co-morbidity score was given to each patient as a measure of surgical risk. Data on intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, blood parameters (drop in haemoglobin, haematocrit value), and incidence of transfusion rates were recorded and assessed. All patients had standardised protocols of anesthesia, postsurgical and rehabilitation care protocols following surgery. Fisher’s-exact test, Chi-square test, and Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. Pearson’s correlation was performed to identify factors associated to blood loss. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 was used.

Results: The intraoperative, postoperative and total blood loss (drop of haemoglobin and haematocrit) were significantly greater in the hypertensive and obese patients (p-value <0.001). The immediate postoperative day 1 haemoglobin and day 1 and 2 haematocrit were significantly better in the normotensive and non obese patients (p-value <0.001). Significantly greater number of hypertensive and obese patients required blood transfusion (p-value=0.045). There was a positive correlation between intraoperative blood loss and operative time in both groups (R?SUP?A#SUP#=0.04, p-value=0.74; R?SUP?B#SUP#=0.09, p-value=0.52) although statistically insignificant. Hypertensive and obese patients required longer hospitalisation (p-value <0.001). Three patients from group B were diagnosed to develop pulmonary embolism while admitted in hospital which was managed successfully by intensivists without any fatality.

Conclusion: Hypertension and obesity were associated with greater blood loss and transfusion requirement compared to non obese and normotensive patients undergoing primary elective TKA.

Keywords

Charlson-Deyo co-morbidity score, Haemoglobin, Haematocrit, Postoperative blood loss, Pulmonary embolism, Risk factors

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has become widely accepted as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage of knee arthritis and these can significantly alleviate pain and restore functional outcome and enhances the quality of life for these patients (1). Significant proportion of patient reporting with degenerative knee disease require surgical intervention. The TKA involves substantial intraoperative blood loss owing to bone cuts and extensive soft-tissue release usually leads to an allogenic or autologous blood transfusion. Transfusions are usually safe, at-times associated with transfusion-related adverse event and potential infectious hazards (2),(3). Several previous reports have shown that blood transfusion increased the risk of surgical-site infections, serious complications, longer hospital length of stay, and even mortality (4),(5),(6).

Further, it increases the cost and more use of resources (7). Autodonation lead to unnecessary low postoperative haemoglobin levels and otherwise unnecessary transfusions (8). The incidence of transfusion requirement and amount of blood loss following TKA appears highly variable in available literatures (5),(6),(9). No single factor attributed to blood loss during surgery necessitating transfusion. Indeed, significant information gaps remain in understanding the common associated risk factors such as hypertension and obesity besides the demographic variables like age and gender (10). A previous study identified preoperative hypertension and/or being overweight/obese as potential risk factor for poor haemodynamic control during Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) (11). In this light, identifying potentially high-risk patients requiring transfusion are vital to formulate strategies for addressing the issue of blood loss and transfusion rate.

The current study aimed to analyse prospectively whether obesity and hypertension affect blood loss and transfusion requirements in primary elective TKA.

Material and Methods

This prospective clinical study was conducted at Shalby Hospital in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, from November 2017 to November 2019, after receiving approved from the Institutional Review Board (ECR/711/InST/GJ/2015/RR-18/01-2017). The study was approved by the Scientific Review Committee and the Institutional Review Board of the participating Health Service. Written Informed consent (about the surgical technique, risks and potential complications) was provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained from all participating patients.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was estimated using formula of simple random sampling for infinite population and assumptions were considered based on the total measured blood loss of 0.663 litres in primary uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty (9). At 95% confidence intervals (5% α), 80% power and 0.1 absolute precision, a power analysis determined that a sample of minimum 86 subjects were required.

n= z2(1-α/2)×p×(1-p) / d2

Confidence level: conventional=95%=1-α; therefore, α=0.05 and z(1-α/2)=1.96=value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to a significance level of 0.05 (1.96 for a 2-sided test at the 0.05 level).

Inclusion criteria: A total of 120 patients with primary Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 and 4 knee osteoarthritis and relentless knee pain despite 6 months of conservative treatment were included in the study (12).

Exclusion criteria: Twenty five patients with history of previous knee surgery, bleeding diathesis, on anticoagulant therapy, complex and revision TKA, postseptic and post-traumatic arthritis were excluded. Also, patient with history of pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, renal dysfunction, and medically unfit patients (unacceptable medical risk or medical co-morbidities had not been sufficiently optimised) were also excluded. Further, four patients for other reasons like declining to participate and unwillingness for the surgery led to their exclusion.

Therefore, 91 patients were recruited into the study and divided into:

• Group A (n=46): Normotensive and non obese
• Group B (n=45): Hypertensive (BP>140/90) (13) and obese; (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) (14). Further, based on Body Mass Index (BMI) and blood pressure, the subjects in group B were categorised into obese and hypertensive:
• Hypertensive: n=25 and
• Obese: n=20

The flow chart for the study is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Procedure

Demographic variables, including age, gender, and severity of diseases, deformity and co-morbidity (hypertension, obesity, diabetes, optimised states of renal/cardiac/liver/pulmonary co-morbidities) were recorded. Medical co-morbidity was measured using the Charlson-Deyo co-morbidity index (15). The haematological parameters (drop in Haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit value) were recorded at baseline, on first and second Postoperative Day (POD). A uniform transfusion protocol was maintained for all participants in the study (16). Postoperative blood transfusion was given if the Haematocrit (Hct) was less than 27% or any patient who had a postoperative Hb <8.0 g%. Venous doppler was performed prior to surgery and on 4th postoperative day to rule out Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT).

All patients were operated by a designated arthroplasty team without tourniquet using standard approach under spinal anesthesia (17). Authors have not used tranexamic acid prior to surgery.

Joint balancing was achieved using standard bone cuts and appropriate soft tissue release. Intraoperative haemostasis was achieved using electrocoagulation. All had cemented posterior stabilised metal backed press fit condylar sigma fix bearing prosthesis. Pulsed lavage technique was used to clean the wound. Arthrotomy was closed in layers without any closed suction drain and staplers were used and covered by an occlusive dressing. All patients received standard chemoprophylaxis for VTE {received Apixaban (Eliquis) 2.5 mg twice for two weeks} (18) and followed a standard protocol of rehabilitation (17).

In all the cases, Intraoperative blood loss (19) was estimated using an electric weighing scale with an accuracy of 0.1 mg (Alexandra Scale Pvt. Ltd. Gujarat, India). The blood volume in the suction cylinders and the number of saturated blood stained mops were used to quantify the blood loss. As all these measurements were carried out before using the pulse lavage thus the fluid volume used during the lavage was excluded. Postoperative blood loss was calculated using two methods:

• The first was the Blood Loss Estimation Using Gauze Visual Analogue method (clinical) during first and second check dress using dry surgical gauze (10×10 cm) as no closed suction drain was used (20).
• The second method was based on haematocrit balance using Gross equation (21). This includes the volume of blood lost due to extravasation in the tissues.

Gross formula is given as under (21):

Estimated blood loss=Estimated blood volume×(Hct initial-Hct final)/Hct average

Where Estimated blood volume=body weight in kg×70 mL/kg

Total blood loss (clinical) was determined by adding intraoperative and postoperative blood loss.

Outcomes measures: Intraoperative, postoperative, and total blood loss (clinical method and Gross equation), incidence of transfusion rates, mean postoperative Hb levels on POD 1 and 2 were the primary end-points. The drop in Hb and Hct was calculated between the lowest postoperative level and the baseline value. Duration of stay in hospital, and complications within the postoperative days were secondary analytic focus. Authors also performed a subgroup analysis to separately compare the above mentioned parameters in obese and hypertensive patients.

Statistical Analysis

All data presented as mean±Standard Deviation (SD) and range. During evaluation, numerically-coded categorical variables were cross tabulated; Fisher’s-exact test or Chi-square was applied as required. If the frequency was <5, Fisher’s-exact p-value was provided; Chi-square p-values were used for all other estimates. Pearson’s correlation was performed to identify factors associated to blood loss. To test the difference between independent means, Student’s t-test was used. Significance was attributed to a p-value <0.05. Analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows software, version 22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The study population included 91 patients comprising of 38 males and 53 females of mean age 68.37±5.17 years (range 62-80). Baseline parameters were similar for both group A and group B (Table/Fig 2).

Both groups were similar in terms of age (p-value=0.5183), gender (p-value=0.44), severity of disease (p-value=0.766), deformity (p-value=0.28), preoperative Hb (p-value=0.9477), preoperative Hct (p-value=0.3376) and Charlson-Deyo co-morbidity index (p-value=0.4270). Average Charlson score was 2.69± 0.957. Nine patients (9.8%) had Charlson score ≥4. The patients in group B had significantly longer surgical time than group A (66.31±8.679 vs. 47.739±3.07 min; p-value <0.001 (Table/Fig 3).

The intraoperative (p-value <0.001), postoperative (visual analogue method) (p-value <0.001), and total (clinical method and Gross equation) blood loss (p-value <0.001) were significantly greater in the group B. The total measured blood loss by clinical method in group A and B amounted to 246.49±110.21 mL and 385.55±168.01 mL respectively in a primary TKR (p-value <0.001). The difference in mean intraoperative blood loss was 128 mL (p-value=0.0001), postoperative blood loss was 10.98 mL (p-value <0.005), total blood loss (clinical) was 139 mL (p-value <0.001), and total blood loss (Gross equation) was 361 mL (p-value <0.001) between the two groups.

Postoperative haematological parameters like haemoglobin and haematocrit presented significant differences between the group A and B. Importantly, the drop in Hb and Hct on postoperative day 1 (p-value <0.001) and day 2 (p-value <0.001) were significantly more in the group B. A significantly greater percentage of patients in the group B required blood transfusion during the study (p-value=0.045). A total of 7 (7.7%) patients needed postsurgical blood transfusion of which 1 (1.09%) was in the group A and 6 (6.66%) in the group B. No transfusion associated complications were found in the study. Patients in group B had significantly longer average stay in the hospital (p-value <0.001). On subgroup analysis, obese patients overall had a longer operative time (p-value=0.8178), greater intraoperative (p-value=0.01) and postoperative blood loss {first check dressing (p-value=0.49); second check dressing (p-value=0.93)} and have higher drop of Hb and Hct on postoperative day 1 (p-value for Hb=0.0855; p-value for Hct=0.2012) and day 2 (p-value for Hb=0.0218; p-value for Hct=0.5262) than in hypertensive groups (Table/Fig 2).

In addition, these patients have higher transfusion rates (χ2=1.3846; p-value=0.2393) and require longer hospitalisation (p-value=0.22). There was a positive correlation between intraoperative blood loss and operative time in both groups (R?SUP?A#SUP#=0.04, p=0.74; R?SUP?B#SUP#=0.09, p-value=0.5253) (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6).

Although statistically insignificant, Likewise, factors such as hypertension and obesity showed a positive correlation between operative time and the intraoperative blood loss but not very significant (R?SUB?H#SUB#=0.049, p?SUB?H#SUB#=0.81; R?SUB?O#SUB#=0.14, po=0.53) (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 7), (Table/Fig 8).

A total of three patients had a postsurgical systemic complication and all of which were from group B. These patients were diagnosed to develop pulmonary embolism while admitted in hospital which was managed successfully by intensivists without any fatality. Vascular insult occurred in a single obese patient which was managed by immediate repair by vascular surgeons without any limb threatening complications.

Discussion

Excess perioperative blood loss can be a major cause of morbidity or even mortality in total knee replacement surgery. Obesity and hypertension is widely regarded as a significant risk factor (11). In the present study, the obese and hypertensive patients had significantly greater blood losses and blood transfusion requirements compared to the group having non obese and normotensive patients. Intraoperative haemodynamic control is considered as main driving forces behind improved surgical outcome (11). In a retrospective cohort study by Nwachukwu BU et al., 118 consecutive patients who underwent Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) were included (11). The authors identified preoperative hypertension and/or being overweight/obese as potential risk factor for poor haemodynamic control during TJA. Furthermore, in the view of orthopaedic surgery, Mortazavi SM et al., suggest that poor haemodynamic control are associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke after TJA (22). A subgroup analysis confirmed that there is greater intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in obese patients than in hypertensive patients.

The blood transfusion rate in obese patients in present study was on the higher side compared with the hypertensive patients, despite having a similar preoperative haemoglobin value. This finding, although insignificant, suggests that intraoperative blood loss influences transfusion rate.

In the present study, both the hypertension and obesity showed a positive correlation between operative time and blood loss. This study found that hypertensive patients had greater amount of blood loss compared to normotensive. The present study results are similar to Durasek J et al., who identify the factors affecting major blood loss in patients undergoing TKA (23). Durasek J et al., concluded that patients with hypertension had a significantly greater amount of blood loss volume and increased blood transfusion requirement as compared to normotensive patients. In addition, Nwachukwu BU et al., in a retrospective analysis have identified hypertension as a significant risk factor for poor haemodynamic control in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (11).

There is controversy in the available evidences concerning the perioperative blood loss and risk of blood transfusion postsurgery. Whilst some authors conclude that obesity did not affect the amount of perioperative blood loss or incidence of blood transfusion (9),(24),(25), others have found obesity correlated with increased perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion rates (26),(27). Consistent with previous studies, the findings of present analysis showed that obesity was associated with increased intraoperative, postoperative blood loss and higher blood transfusion rate.

Furthermore, significant drop in postoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit values in these patients was noted. This difference was attributable to the fact that the greater surface area of subcutaneous fat exposed leads to more tissue fluid loss. This may also elucidate greater intraoperative losses, not of tissue fluid but of blood, from more arterial and venous bleeding points (28). In addition, Nwachukwu BU et al., identified that being overweight/obese was independently associated with an increased risk for poor haemodynamic control (11). Although the exact pathophysiological is largely unknown, autonomic dysfunction could provide a plausible explanation (29). Also, the increased surgery time further contributes to increased intraoperative blood loss and inturn transfusion rate. A one minute increase in anesthesia time leads to increase of 3.167 mL total blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (30).

The present study demonstrated a significant difference between the group A and B regarding the operative times (p-value <0.001). This may be attributed to increase surgical bleeding that inturn significantly compromised the optimal view of the operative field (31). Secondly, the surgeon took few minutes to effectively and efficiently manage hemostasis.

In addition, a relatively longer length of skin incision and extensile soft tissue dissection for adequate exposure significantly influence the operative time in obese patients. Further, the additional layers of adipose tissue make visualisation of the structures of knee joint difficult. This restricted visualisation of the operative field results to technical errors related to imprecise bone cuts, more damage to soft tissue structures, and poor positioning of the prosthesis (32). Thus, authors believe that the obesity and hypertension should be considered as potential risk indicator for prolonged surgical time when performing TKA. The current study finding is supported by the results of prior literature that showed that obesity was related to longer surgical time in patients undergoing unilateral TKA (33). This critical information will allow arthroplasty team to appropriately utilise the operating theatre time and resources.

There are conflicting reports concerning the association of length of surgery and blood loss in patients undergoing TJA. Some studies have identified a positive association between these variables (9),(28) while others failed (34),(35). The results from present study corroborate the previous findings demonstrating a positive correlation between the apparent total blood loss and surgical time (9),(28). Notably, gender difference could affect surgical total blood loss, with greater amount in male patients compared with female patients. In the present study there is significantly more perioperative blood loss in male patients than in female patients. These findings from present study also received agreement from several scholars who also showed that male experience greater blood loss than female in TKA (9),(35).

In the current study, on subgroup analysis of group B there was no statistically significant difference between the obese and hypertensive groups with regard to postoperative blood loss, drop in Hct and day 1 Hb level although the intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, postoperative day 2 Hb and transfusion rate was significantly higher in obese patients. This may be attributable to poor haemodynamic control in obese patients (11).

Authors found that there was significant difference in length of stay between group A and B patients. Obese and hypertensive patients were likely to stay longer in hospital. Delayed postsurgical rehabilitation, blood transfusion and in-patient complications could be the plausible factors (36). Thus authors believe that factors such as obesity and hypertension significantly influence Length of Stay (LOS) following TKA.

In the current study, the apparent total blood loss was on the lower side compared with the other scholars (9),(35),(37),(38),(39),(40),(41),(42) (Table/Fig 9).

The lower value is probably attributed to different method employed for the measurement of postoperative blood loss. Authors stated that previous literature have focused on the blood loss estimation by draining in the postoperative period but have not evaluate the amount of blood lost after a tourniquet release in the compression dressing or in the blood soaked in the tissues (43),(44),(45). Also, they have not assessed the blood soaked gauge while dressing. In the present study, the authors have used visual analogue method instead of negative suction drain. This method may increase the precision of blood loss assessment and reduces the consequences related to over or underestimation of blood loss (20). Authors believe that using drain after replacement diminished the tamponade effect and thus increases blood loss. Likewise, the study found no difference in the incidence of wound infection, dehiscence or haematoma formation between drained and without drainage (46). Further, increased transfusion reflected greater blood loss associated with drain. Authors have not used tourniquet in any of the case. The authors were skeptical concerning the use of tourniquet. A meta-analysis and systematic review concluded that using tourniquet during the surgery does not reduce the transfusion requirement rather showed a trend for greater complications compared to non tourniquet patients (47).

In the present study, tranexamic acid was not used prior to surgery. as it may lead to significant underestimation of blood loss and thus give false confidence in the results (39),(40). The transfusion requirement in current study has been low compared with other scholars (9), (35). This could be attributed to meticulous dissection, reduced mean operative time, use of cemented implants, plugging the femoral intramedullary canal and not using drain (37). This study also highlights that obese and hypertensive patients have greater transfusion requirements. Inaddition, obese patients require more transfusion than hypertensive patients. This finding, although insignificant, suggests that intraoperative blood loss influences transfusion rate.

A total of 3 patients had a postsurgical systemic complication and all of which were from group B. Two patients were diagnosed to develop pulmonary embolism while admitted in hospital which was managed successfully by intensivists without any fatality. Study by Holst AG et al., identified that hypertension, smoking, and obesity were important risk factors for VTE (48). Vascular injury during surgical procedure occurred in single obese patient. Authors believe that obese patients were more prone for the vascular insult owing to complicated surgical exposure and limited visualisation due to excessive layers of adipose tissue (49).

Limitation(s)

Firstly, the sample size was small, so additional investigation in a larger cohort is required. Secondly, impact of changing of categorisation of obesity on blood loss and transfusion requirement was not assessed. Thirdly, the functional outcome was not investigated. Fourth, only adverse health outcome events that occured within the primary hospitalisation could be investigated, data on postdischarge events were not assessed.

Conclusion

Both hypertension and obesity were associated with greater blood loss and transfusion requirement, require longer hospitalisation compared to non obese and normotensive patients undergoing replacement surgery. Intraoperative blood loss influences transfusion rate. Likewise, these patients were more likely to have adverse effects. Operative time showed a positive correlation with the blood loss. The present study quantifies the potential risk in the hypertensive and obese patients undergoing TKA and will aid in preoperative planning and consent.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge all the patients who participated in the study, nursing, paramedical staff. Authors also acknowledge the contribution of entire research team.

References

1.
Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: A 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:10-17. [crossref]
2.
Vasudev R, Sawhney V, Dogra M, Raina TR. Transfusion-related adverse reactions: From institutional hemovigilance effort to National Hemovigilance program. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016;10(1):31-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Scott SR, Zunyou WU. Risks and challenges of HIV infection transmitted via blood transfusion. Biosafety and Health. 2019;1(3):124-28. [crossref]
4.
Danninger T, Rasul R, Poeran J, Stundner O, Mazumdar M, Fleischut PM, et al. Blood transfusions in total hip and knee arthroplasty: An analysis of outcomes. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:623460. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Hart A, Khalil JA, Carli A, Huk O, Zukor D, Antoniou J. Blood transfusion in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Incidence, risk factors, and thirty-day complication rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1945-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kim JL, Park JH, Han SB, Cho IY, Jang KM. Allogeneic blood transfusion is a significant risk factor for surgical-site infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(1):320-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Nichols CI, Vose JG. Comparative risk of transfusion and incremental total hospitalization cost for primary unilateral, bilateral, and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(3):583-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Cohen JA, Brecher ME. Preoperative autologous blood donation: Benefit or detriment; a mathematical analysis. Transfusion. 1995;35:640-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Prasad N, Padmanabhan V, Mullaji A. Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of risk factors. Int Orthop. 2007;31(1):39-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Kumar SV, Lakhwani OP. Prognostic Factors of perioperative Hemorrhage, Blood Transfusion and Tranexamic Acid Infusion in Bilateral Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Comparative Study. Trauma Acute Care. 2020;5(3):84. Doi: 10.36648/2476-2105.5.3.84.
11.
Nwachukwu BU, Collins JE, Nelson EP, Concepcion M, Thornhill TS, Katz JN. Obesity & hypertension are determinants of poor hemodynamic control during total joint arthroplasty: A retrospective review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:20. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494-502. [crossref]
13.
Angeli F, Reboldi G, Verdecchia P. The 2014 hypertension guidelines: Implications for patients and practitioners in Asia. Heart Asia. 2015;7(2):21-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:163-70.
15.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613-19. [crossref]
16.
Lee QJ, Mak WP, Yeung ST, Wong YC, Wai YL. Blood Management Protocol for Total Knee Arthroplasty to Reduce Blood Wastage and Unnecessary Transfusion. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015;23(1):66-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Shah VI, Upadhyay S, Shah K, Sheth A, Kshatriya A, Patil J. Proximal fibular resection improves knee biomechanics and enhances tibial stress fracture healing in patients with osteoarthritis with varus deformity: A prospective, randomized control analysis. Arthroplasty. 2020;2(1):11. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Shah VI, Pachore JA, Upadhyay S, Shah K, Seth A, Kshatriya A, et al. Predictors of 90-Day All-Cause Morbidity, Mortality and Poor Functional Outcome Scores Following Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty in a High-Volume Setting: A Prospective Cohort Study. Indian J Orthop. 2021;56(4):646-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Pachore JA, Shah VI, Upadhyay S, Shah K, Sheth A, Kshatriya A. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head: A prospective blinded randomized controlled study. Arthroplasty. 2019;1(1):12. Doi: 10.1186/s42836-019-0012-6. PMID: 35240768; PMCID: PMC8796629. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Ali Algadiem E, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI, Buhlaiqah NR, Algadeeb JB, Alsneini HA. Blood Loss Estimation Using Gauze Visual Analogue. Trauma Mon. 2016;21(2):e34131. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: Corrected for dilution. Anesthesiology. 1983;58:277-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Mortazavi SM, Kakli H, Bican O, Moussouttas M, Parvizi J, Rothman RH. Perioperative stroke after total joint arthroplasty: Prevalence, predictors, and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(11):2095-101. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Durasek J, Dovzak-Bajs I, Sarić V. Factors affecting blood loss in total knee arthroplasty patients. Acta Med Croatica. 2010;64(3):209-14.
24.
Frisch N, Wessell N, Charters M. Effect of body mass index on blood transfusion in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2016;39:844-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Cao G, Chen G, Yang X. Obesity does not increase blood loss or incidence of immediate postoperative complications during simultaneous total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter study. Knee. 2020;27(3):963-69. Doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.01.012. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Noticewala MS, Nyce JD, Wang W, Geller JA, Macaulay W. Predicting need for allogeneic transfusion after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2012;27:961-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Nuttall G, Santrach P, Oliver WJ. The predictors of red cell transfusions in total hip arthroplasties. Transfusion. 1996;36:144-149. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Weber EW, Slappendel R, Prins MH, van der Schaaf DB, Durieux ME, Strümper D. Perioperative blood transfusions and delayed wound healing after hip replacement surgery: Effects on duration of hospitalization. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(5):1416-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Kurukulasuriya LR, Stas S, Lastra G, Manrique C, Sowers JR. Hypertension in obesity. Med Clin North Am. 2011;95(5):903-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Hrnack SA, Skeen N, Xu T, Rosenstein AD. Correlation of body mass index and blood loss during total knee and total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012;41(10):467-71.
31.
Villanueva M. Introduction: Effective hemostasis in surgery. AORN J. 2008;88(3):S1. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Robert E, Booth Jr. Total knee arthroplasty in the obese patient: Tips and quips. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4)1:69-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Gadinsky NE, Manuel JB, Lyman S, Westrich GH. Increased operating room time in patients with obesity during primary total knee arthroplasty: Conflicts for scheduling. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(6):1171-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Kolisek FR, Bonutti PM, Hozack WJ, Purtill J, Sharkey PF, Zelicof SB, et al. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: Early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(1):08-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Cushner FD, Friedman RJ. Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;269(1):98-101. [crossref]
36.
CK Lo MB, Lee QJ, Wong YC. Predictive factors for length of hospital stay following primary total knee replacement in a total joint replacement centre in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2017;23(5):435-40. [crossref]
37.
Mylod AG Jr, France MP, Muser DE, Parsons JR. Perioperative blood loss associated with total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of procedures performed with and without cementing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(7):1010-12. [crossref]
38.
Raut VV, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM. Reduction of postoperative blood loss after press-fit condylar knee arthroplasty with use of a femoral intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(9):1356-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Benoni G, Fredin H. Fibrinolytic inhibition with tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and blood transfusion after knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 86 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(3):434-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Tanaka N, Sakahashi H, Sato E, Hirose K, Ishima T, Ishii S. Timing of the administration of tranexamic acid for maximum reduction in blood loss in arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(5):702-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Hu Y, Li Q, Wei BG, Zhang XS, Torsha TT, Xiao J, Shi ZJ. Blood loss of total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: An analysis of influential factors. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):325. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Meng Y, Li Z, Gong K, An X, Dong J, Tang P. Tranexamic acid reduces intraoperative occult blood loss and tourniquet time in obese knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:675-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Roy N, Smith M, Anwar M, Elsworth C. Delayed release of drain in total knee replacement reduces blood loss. A prospective randomised study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72(1):34-38.
44.
Prasad N, Padmanabhan V, Mullaji A. Comparasion between two methods of drain clamping after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(6):381-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Tai TW, Yang CY, Jou IM, Lai KA, Chen CH. Temporary drainage clamping after total knee arthroplasty: A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(8):1240-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):Cd001825. [crossref]
47.
Smith TO, Hing CB. Is a tourniquet beneficial in total knee replacement surgery? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Knee. 2010;17(2):141-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
Holst AG, Jensen G, Prescott E. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism: Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;121(17):1896-903. [crossref] [PubMed]
49.
Suclla-Velásquez JA, Smedts C. Obesity: A Risk Factor for Infection after Surgery. In: Himmerich H, editor. Weight Management. London: Intech Open; 2020. [cited 2022 May 19]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71076 Doi: 10.5772/intechopen.91216. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56328.16406

Date of Submission: Mar 13, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Apr 04, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 27, 2022
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 22, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 23, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Apr 20, 2022 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com