Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 210669

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : June | Volume : 16 | Issue : 6 | Page : OC39 - OC42 Full Version

Impact of Duration of Disease and Glycosylated Haemoglobin Level in Determining the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective, Cross-sectional, Observational Study


Published: June 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53023.16542
Krishna Chandra Narzary , Sanjib Kumar Boro , Naba Kanta Das

1. Senior Consultant, Department of Cardiology, GNRC Medical, North Guwahati, Assam, India. 2. Consultant, Department of Cardiology, GNRC Medical, North Guwahati, Assam, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, GNRC Medical, North Guwahati, Assam, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Krishna Chandra Narzary,
Senior Consultant, Department of Cardiology, GNRC Medical, North Guwahati, Assam, India.
E-mail: drkrishna_narzary@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Introduction: Duration of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and degree of glycaemic control play a pivotal role in the development of macrovascular complications of T2DM, including Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). However, association of the duration of T2DM and Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) level with the severity of CAD is still an ongoing matter of debate in the diabetic patient subset.

Aim: To investigate the association of duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with severity of CAD in patients presenting with T2DM suspected of CAD.

Materials and Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on 500 T2DM patients at GNRC Medical, Guwahati, Assam, India from June 2017 to June 2019. The T2DM patients with suspected CAD were studied and stratified according to the duration of T2DM (<10 and >10 years) and HbA1c level (<7% or ≥7%). All patients underwent coronary angiography to assess number of diseased vessels i.e., insignificant CAD (defined as <50% diameter stenosis in left main and <70% diameter stenosis in other branches), Single Vessel Disease (SVD), Double Vessel Disease (DVD), Triple Vessel Disease (TVD), and Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) disease. Chi-square test was used to assess the association of the duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with angiographic severity of CAD. The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0, (Chicago, IL, USA).

Results: A total of 500 patients were studied, of which, 295 (59%) and 205 (41%) patients had <10 and ≥10 year duration of T2DM, respectively. Overall, 264 (52.8%) patients had HbA1c <7%, and 236 (47.2%) had ≥7%. Normal coronary artery (42.4% vs. 5.9%; p=0.00001), insignificant CAD (9.8% vs. 2.4%; p=0.00124), SVD (21% vs. 6.8%; p=0.00001), and LMCA disease (2.4% vs. 13.2%; p=0.00001) were significantly higher in patients with <10 year duration of T2DM than ≥10 year. On the other hand, DVD (12.9% vs. 28.8%; p=0.00001), and TVD (11.5% vs. 42.9%; p=0.00001) were significantly higher in patients with ≥10 year duration of T2DM as compared to <10 year. Normal coronary artery (34.8% vs. 19.1%; p=0.0001), and insignificant CAD (10.2% vs. 2.9%; p=0.0013) was higher in patients with HbA1c level <7% than ≥7%. The prevalence of TVD (18.6% vs. 30.9%; p=0.0013), and LMCA disease (3.8% vs. 10.2%; p=0.0047) were significantly lower in patients with HbA1c level <7 than ≥7%.

Conclusion: The T2DM patients with suspected CAD, longer duration of T2DM and poor glycaemic control were associated with more severe CAD.

Keywords

Coronary angiography, Double vessel disease, Insignificant coronary artery disease, Left main coronary artery disease, Single vessel disease, Triple vessel disease

Approximately 69.2 million individuals are estimated to have diabetes in India (1), which is expected to rise to 79.4 million by 2030 (2). The T2DM is becoming an increasingly significant metabolic threat worldwide, however more so in India. T2DM is often accompanied by a broad spectrum of complications, including microvascular complications such as renal, retinal, and neuropathic diseases and macrovascular complications such as vascular disease and CAD (3). The cardiovascular system is the most affected, which may even consequence death. The leading cause of death among people with diabetes is atherosclerotic disease. The association between T2DM and higher prevalence of CAD along with higher morbidity, more fatal coronary events owing to the higher frequency of plaque rupture, and superimposed thrombosis in diffusely diseased coronary arteries have been demonstrated earlier (4).

The duration of T2DM and degree of glycaemic control play essential roles in the development of macrovascular complications of T2DM (5). Nevertheless, substantial literature about the relationship between the duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with the severity of CAD in patients with T2DM reveals controversial findings. Some studies have revealed an association between the duration of T2DM and the progression of cardiovascular disease (6),(7),(8), while others have not (9),(10). HbA1c level is a surrogate marker for long term glycaemic control in patients with T2DM. Many studies have revealed that elevated HbA1c levels correlate with the severity of CAD and indicate HbA1c as a biomarker of extensive CAD (11),(12). Controversially, Shahim B et al., did not observe a positive correlation between HbA1c and cardiovascular related outcomes such as death, non fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalisation due to heart failure (13). According to new clinical practice recommendations from the American Diabetes Association (ADA), reduced HbA1c levels are associated with decreased risk of neuropathic, microvascular and macrovascular complications. However, these guidelines advocate that more research is warranted to establish a relationship between HbA1c level and macrovascular complications of T2DM (14).

Much research has been done to demonstrate the duration of T2DM and HbA1c as a predictor of the severity of coronary artery disease in people with T2DM in the past (6),(7),(15),(16),(17). Nevertheless, data regarding the relationship between duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with the severity of CAD among Indian patients with T2DM is still not well established. Hence, the present study aimed to assess the association of duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with the severity of CAD in patients presenting with T2DM with suspected CAD.

Material and Methods

This prospective, cross-sectional, observational study comprised 500 consecutive T2DM patients at GNRC Medical, Guwahati, Assam, India, who underwent coronary angiography at a tertiary care Hospital, from June 2017 to June 2019. This study was conducted with the permission of the Head of Cardiology Department, GNRC Medical, Assam, India. This study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and patients were enrolled in the study after providing informed written consent.

Inclusion criteria: Irrespective of age and gender, T2DM patients with suspected CAD based on the clinical history and positive stress tests were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with the acute coronary syndrome were excluded from the study.

Patients were subdivided into two groups according to the duration of T2DM: (a) <10 year duration of T2DM; or (b) ≥10 year duration of T2DM. Patients were also stratified into two groups according to HbA1c level: (a) HbA1c <7%; or (b) HbA1c level ≥7%.

Study Procedure

The CAD was diagnosed based on the following angiographic criteria: (a) ≥70% diameter stenosis; and (b) ≥50% diameter stenosis in LMCA disease. Patients were considered type 2 diabetics if they fulfilled any one of the following criteria put forth by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for the diagnosis of T2DM; a) Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L), fasting was defined as no caloric intake for atleast 8 hours; b) two hour plasma glucose concentration of ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT); c) classic symptoms of hyperglycaemia or hyperglycaemic crisis or random plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) (18).

Severity of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM): The severity of CAD was measured according to the number of diseased vessels categorised as: normal coronary arteries, insignificant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Single Vessel Disease (SVD), Double Vessel Disease (DVD), Triple Vessel Disease (TVD), and Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) disease. Insignificant CAD was defined as <50% diameter stenosis in the left main and <70% diameter stenosis in other branches. The severity of T2DM was assessed by glycaemic control, which was determined by estimating of HbA1c using high performance liquid chromatography. HbA1c was measured before starting the angiography procedure. HbA1c level <7% was considered good glycaemic control, whereas HbA1c level ≥7% was considered poor glycaemic control.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0, (Chicago, IL, USA). The data are presented as numbers and percentages. The association of duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with angiographic severity of CAD was analysed using the Chi-square test. Throughout the analysis, p≤0.05 was the criteria for statistical significance.

Results

Demographic characteristics: A total of 500 patients were included in this prospective analysis. The majority (41.8%) of the patients were between 50 and 60 years of age, followed by 60-70 years (25.2%) (Table/Fig 1). Males outnumbered females constituting 83.8% of the study population (Table/Fig 2). Out of the total, 152 (30.4%) patients had hypertension, 162 (32.4%) had dyslipidaemia, 52 (10.4%) had a family history of CAD, 76 (15.2%) were smokers, and 66 (13.2%) were obese.

Angiography findings: Coronary angiographies detected normal coronary arteries in 137 (27.4%) patients, insignificant CAD in 34 (6.8%) patients, and abnormal angiography findings in 329 (65.8%) patients (Table/Fig 3). Of the 329 patients with abnormal angiography findings, there were 76 (15.2%) patients with SVD, 97 (19.4%) with DVD, 122 (24.4%) with TVD, and 34 (6.8%) with LMCA disease.

Association between angiography findings and duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus: There were 295 (59.0%) patients with <10 year duration of T2DM and 205 (41.0%) patients with ≥10 year duration of T2DM. Angiography findings revealed that the proportion of patients with DVD (12.9% vs. 28.8%; p=0.00001) and TVD (11.5% vs. 42.9%; p=0.00001) were significantly differed between <10 and ≥10 year duration of T2DM (Table/Fig 4).

Association between angiography findings and Glycosylated Haemoglobin level (HbA1c): There were 264 (52.8%) patients with HbA1c <7% and 236 (47.2%) patients with HbA1c level ≥7%. The prevalence of TVD (18.6% vs. 30.9%; p=0.0013) and LMCA disease (3.8% vs. 10.2%; p=0.0047) were significantly higher in patients with HbA1c level ≥7% as compared to <7% (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Due to the availability of more advanced treatment and technology to treat cardiovascular diseases, a significant decline in morbidity and mortality rates has been noted. T2DM, remains the leading risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease including CAD. Accordingly, there is considerable interest in identifying the relationship between the duration of T2DM and HbA1c level with the severity of CAD in patients with T2DM. With elevated HbA1c levels and increased duration of T2DM, a more severe, extensive, and distal type of CAD was observed in the study population.

As mentioned earlier, the risk of chronic vascular complications of T2DM elevates as a function of the duration of T2DM and the degree of hyperglycaemia. The Framingham Heart Study, reported a 1.38 fold increased risk for CAD and a 1.86 fold higher risk for cardiovascular death for each 10 year increase in the duration of T2DM (19). Similarly, a recent analysis by Wannamethee SG et al., proposed that early onset diabetes with >10 year duration was associated with an increased risk of major coronary heart diseases and mortality (20). Benjamin BK et al., noted that in the group of ≤10 year duration of T2DM, the combined incidences of DVD and TVD were reported in 80% of cases, while it was 89.2% in the group of >10 year duration of T2DM (21). Collectively, all previous studies indicate that the duration of T2DM influences the coronary arteries of Indian patients more adversely. Consistent with earlier findings, the current study also found that the presence of the most severe forms of coronary atherosclerosis, i.e., DVD and TVD, as well as stenosis in LMCA artery, were observed in patients with ≥10 year duration of T2DM. On the contrary, Uddin SN et al., presented results suggestive of no significant correlation of the severity of CAD with severity (r=0.089602; p>0.1) and duration (r=0.07865; p>0.1) of T2DM on univariate analysis (22). In line with the study as mentioned earlier, one prospective study showed no statistical association between the duration of T2DM and the severity of CAD in patients with T2DM (23). The reason for these contradictory findings remains unknown. However, authors opine that differences in intensive glycaemic control, presence of other co-morbidities/cardiovascular risk factors, and duration of diabetes could have played a significant role.

Hyperglycaemia is the most common feature of T2DM and is key factor in the development of vascular complication in the people with diabetes (24),(25). The mechanism behind this may be attributed to hyperglycaemia related sequential mechanisms involving the polyol pathway, formation of advanced glycation end products, activation of Protein Kinase C (PKC) isoforms, 12/15 lipoxygenase pathway, and hexosamine pathway that result in increased formation of reactive oxygen species, promotes diabetic atherosclerosis, and ultimately cause cardiovascular diseases (26). Stamler J et al., hypothesised that optimal glycaemic control (defined as HbA1c ≤7%) results in reduced incidence of macrovascular complications in patients with T2DM (27). There is consistent evidence of a significant positive correlation between HbA1c level and the number of vessels involved (28),(29),(30). Khaw KT et al., demonstrated that a 1% rise in HbA1c concentration was associated with an approximately 30% increase in all cause mortality and 40% increase in cardiovascular or ischaemic heart disease mortality in diabetics (31). A recent study proved that HbA1c is an independent predictor for the severity of CAD (11). Findings from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) revealed that a 1% reduction in baseline HbA1c levels decreased the event of myocardial infarction by 5% (32). In contrast to earlier findings, Lazzeri C et al., asserted that HbA1c level was not associated with the mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with known diabetes submitted to mechanical revascularisation (33). In support of this finding, from his systemic review, Liu Y et al., also stated that an elevated HbA1c level is an independent risk factor for mortality in CAD without diabetes (34). Current study could be explained by the fact that the same cut-off value that defined elevated HbA1c may have been significantly too low to identify those with chronic hyperglycaemia in diabetic patients than non diabetic patients. In the present study, authors found that extensive CAD in terms of number of vessels involved and stenosis in the LMCA artery was more prevalent in patients with poor glycaemic control i.e., ≥7% HbA1c levels.

Limitation(s)

The study’s major limitation is that it was a single centre study with limited patient population; a multicentre study with a larger study cohort may provide a more accurate estimation of study parameters. Secondly, the study participants are exclusively limited to Indian patients; therefore, generalisations to other ethnic groups should be made with caution. Lastly, the duration of diabetes was either self-reported or acquired from clinical records review. Hence, it is probable that the reported duration of T2DM may have been either overestimated or underestimated.

Conclusion

Increased duration of T2DM and poor glycaemic control can lead to more severe CAD concerning the involvement of more vessels and stenosis in LMCA artery in T2DM patients with suspected CAD. This study emphasises the identification of CAD changes in a specific time frame due to T2DM, which would benefit better management and prevention of CAD among the T2DM population.

References

1.
Vijayakumar G, Manghat S, Vijayakumar R, Simon L, Scaria LM, Vijayakumar A, et al. Incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes in Kerala, India: Results from a 10-year prospective cohort. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):140. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kaveeshwar SA, Cornwall J. The current state of diabetes mellitus in India. Australas Med J. 2014;7(1):45-48. [crossref]
3.
Wu Y, Ding Y, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Risk factors contributing to type 2 diabetes and recent advances in the treatment and prevention. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(11):1185-200. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Donnelly R, Emslie-Smith AM, Gardner ID, Morris AD. ABC of vascular disease: Vascular complications of diabetes. BMJ. 2000;320(7241):1062-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Leon BM, Maddox TM. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(13):1246-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Cho E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. The impact of diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction on mortality from all causes and from coronary heart disease in men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(5):954-60. [crossref]
7.
Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Solomon CG, Liu S, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus on mortality from all causes and coronary heart disease in women: 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(14):1717-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Brun E, Nelson RG, Bennett PH, Imperatore G, Zoppini G, Verlato G, et al. Diabetes duration and cause-specific mortality in the Verona Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(8):1119-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Jarrett RJ, Shipley MJ. Type 2 (non insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease-putative association via common antecedents; further evidence from the Whitehall Study. Diabetologia. 1988;31(10):737-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Haffner SM, Mitchell BD, Stern MP, Hazuda HP. Macrovascular complications in Mexican Americans with type II diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1991;14(7):665-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Hong LF, Li XL, Guo YL, Luo SH, Zhu CG, Qing P, et al. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c as a marker predicting the severity of coronary artery disease and early outcome in patients with stable angina. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:89. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Mahmoud HEM, Elsaied ARA, Hassan MH. Correlation of glycosylated hemoglobin level with the severity of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. J Biol Med. 2020;4(1):01-05. [crossref]
13.
Shahim B, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Gyberg V, Kotseva K, Mellbin L, et al. The prognostic value of fasting plasma glucose, two-hour postload glucose, and HbA1c in patients with coronary artery disease: A report from EUROASPIRE IV: A survey from the European Society of Cardiology. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(9):1233-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
American Diabetes Association; Bantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, et al. Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2007;31(Suppl 1):S61-S78. Doi: 10.2337/dc08-s061. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Lemp GF, Vander Zwaag R, Hughes JP, Maddock V, Kroetz F, Ramanathan K, et al. Association between the severity of diabetes mellitus and coronary arterial atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60(13):1015-19. [crossref]
16.
Ghaffari S, Niafar F, Separham A, Niafar M, Pourafkari L, Nader ND. Association between HbA1c levels with severity of coronary artery disease and short-term outcomes of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in nondiabetic patients. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;9(5):305-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Dutta B, Neginhal M, Iqbal F. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) correlation with severity of coronary artery disease in non diabetic patients- A hospital based Study from North-Eastern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(9):OC20-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:S37-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Fox CS, Sullivan L, D’Agostino RB, Wilson PW. The significant effect of diabetes duration on coronary heart disease mortality: The Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):704-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Lennon L, Sattar N. Impact of diabetes on cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality in older men: Influence of age at onset, diabetes duration, and established and novel risk factors. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):404-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Benjamin BK, Qiu C, Han Z, Lu W, Sun G, Qin X, et al. The Association between type-2 diabetes duration and major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Diabetes Res. 2021;2021:7580486. [crossref]
22.
Uddin SN, Siddiqui NI, Begum F, Malik F, Rahman S. Correlation between severity of coronary artery athesclerosis and duration and severity of diabetes mellitus in type 2 diabetic patients. Mymensingh Med J. 2003;12(2):85-88.
23.
Krishnaswami S, Joseph G, Punnoose E, Chandy ST. Coronary angiographic findings in patients with diabetes: An exercise in cardiovascular epidemiology. J Assoc Physicians India. 1996;44(3):169-71.
24.
Pistrosch F, Natali A, Hanefeld M. Is hyperglycemia a cardiovascular risk factor? Diabetes care. 2011;34(Suppl 2):S128-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Davidson JA, Parkin CG. Is hyperglycemia a causal factor in cardiovascular disease? Does proving this relationship really matter? Yes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2):S331-S333. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Gleissner CA, Galkina E, Nadler JL, Ley K. Mechanisms by which diabetes increases cardiovascular disease. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2007;4(3):131-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(2):434-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Hegde SS, Mallesh P, Yeli SM, Gadad VM, M Punja G. Comparitive angiographic profile in diabetic and non diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):MC07-10.
29.
Saleem T, Mohammad KH, Abdel-Fattah MM, Abbasi AH. Association of glycosylated haemoglobin level and diabetes mellitus duration with the severity of coronary artery disease. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008;5(3):184-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Dar MI, Beig JR, Jan I, Shah TR, Ali M, Rather HA, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and association of HbA1c with severity of coronary artery disease in patients presenting as non diabetic acute coronary syndrome. Egypt Heart J. 2020;72(1):66. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Khaw KT, Wareham N, Luben R, Bingham S, Oakes S, Welch A, et al. Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk). BMJ. 2001;322(7277):15-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Lazzeri C, Valente S, Chiostri M, Picariello C, Attanà P, Gensini GF. Glycated hemoglobin in ST-elevation myocardial infarction without previously known diabetes: Its short and long term prognostic role. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;95(1):e14-e16. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Liu Y, Yang YM, Zhu J, Tan HQ, Liang Y, Li JD. Prognostic significance of hemoglobin A1c level in patients hospitalised with coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011;10:98. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53023.16542

Date of Submission: Oct 27, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 18, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 10, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 09, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 05, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com