Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 96301

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : CC05 - CC07 Full Version

Evaluation of Self-directed Learning Readiness among Students of Medicine and Allied Branches in South Kashmir, India


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57749.16679
Mehak Mufti, Shaugfa Aara, Haneen Beg, Mudasir Dar, Mohsina Mukhtar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 4. Technician, Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mehak Mufti,
Department of Physiology, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
E-mail: muftimehak@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of Self-directed Learning (SDL) is to motivate the undergraduate student to become a lifelong learner who plays an active role in the acquisition of knowledge and skills. With the implementation of competency based medical education (CBME) in 2019, SDL has become an integral part of the curriculum hence it is important to know whether our students are ready for it or not.

Aim: To assess the readiness of the students of Medical College and college of Nursing and Paramedical sciences, Government medical college, Anantnag for SDL.

Materials and Methods: An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted on 295 undergraduate medical and paramedical students of Government medical college, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Williamson’s SDL readiness scale (SDLRS) was provided to the students who were instructed to describe themselves by indicating on the Likert scale, the extent to which the item best described their personal attitude. The score ranges from 60 to 300. Data was calculated in form of frequency (n) and percentages (%) and was analysed by using Pearson Chi-square test.

Results: Out of the 295 students (150 were boys and 145 were girls, 195 medical and 100 paramedical students), mean age 19.07±0.762 years, who took part in the study, 40% (N=118) had high readiness scores, 52.88% (N=156) had moderate score and 7.12% (N=21) had low score. A total of 45.52 % (N=66) of girls had high readiness as compared to 34.66% (N=52) boys. Nursing and paramedical students appeared to be more ready for SDL than Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students as 52% (N=52) of nursing and paramedical students had a high score whereas only 33.85 % (N=66) of medical students had a high score and this difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: Most of the medical and paramedical students seem to be ready for self-directed learning and paramedics are more ready for SDL than medical students. Female students seem to be more receptive for SDL as compared to male students.

Keywords

Competency-based medical education, Paramedics, Teaching-learning methods

Self-directed learning (SDL) has been defined by, Hammond M, Collins R, Knowles M but the most widely accepted definition is the one given by Knowles who defines SDL as a process in which the individual takes the initiative with or without the help of others in identifying their learning needs, setting goals, identifying resources for learning (human & material), choosing and implementing appropriate learning strategies, and evaluating the outcomes (1),(2). SDL encourages the students to work in teams, to contribute actively in their learning, problem solving, organise work, distribute responsibility, manage time better and make them aware of their capabilities (3),(4). A medical student needs to be an active lifelong learner and team worker, equipped for current educational innovations like problem based learning and small group teachings as these methods allow an in-depth understanding of the subject, resulting in an improved ability to assemble and present information. These learning interactions provide an opportunity to brainstorm and think critically, thus resulting in effective communication skills and confidence in the students and provide quick feedback (5),(6). Conventional teaching methods mainly comprise of monologue lectures where the student passively absorbs the material presented by the instructor but with SDL the teacher’s role shifts from that of a passive educator to that of a facilitator (7). With the implementation of the Competency-based Medical Education (CBME) in 2019, National medical commission (NMC) mandates 309 hours of SDL in the entire MBBS course with 98 hours in first year, 85 hours in second year, 66 hours in third year and 60 hours in final year (8),(9).

With the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-2019) pandemic in 2020, educational institutions had to be closed off and most of the courses were shifted from the conventional classroom didactic lectures to learning via digital platforms leading to people resorting to internet modalities more than ever. Hence the role of SDL cannot be overlooked and the need of the hour is to promote and implement SDL. With proper implementation of the SDL, students can continue their learning assignments, remain informed and prepare for the future as lifelong learners (10),(11),(12). Students who are methodical, self-disciplined, effective communicators, receptive to feedback and engage in self evaluation are ideal candidates for SDL but not all students possess the ideal learning aptitudes and work/learning ethics. Because of this, it becomes important to assess how ready the students are for SDL, and to sensitise them for the same before implementing it (7),(11). No such study has been conducted on SDL readiness in medical students in Jammu and Kashmir. This brings us to the need for the present study. Hence this study was conducted with an aim to evaluate the extent to which the learner possesses the abilities and personal characteristics appropriate for SDL.

Material and Methods

This was an institution-based cross-sectional study conducted at Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from August 2019 to December 2021 after approval from the Institution Ethics Committee (IEC/GMCA/21/024) on 310 students of medicine and allied branches. This is a newly established medical college with only 2 batches of MBBS (100 students per batch) and 1 batch of paramedic students (110 students per batch). All the students enrolled in the college at the time of initiation of this study were included (convenient sampling). Though the scale was distributed to 310 students, responses were received from 295 students only (195 MBBS students, 76 Paramedical students and 24 nursing students). The purpose of the study was explained to all the students and informed written consent was taken from them.

Inclusion criteria: Students who volunteered to be a part of the study were included.

Exclusion criteria: Those who were not willing initially and those students who did not return the filled SDLRS forms were excluded from the study.

Different scales have been formulated to assess the readiness of the students for SDL like Guglielminos self-directed learning readiness scale (SDLRS), Odds continuing learning inventory (OCLI), Ryan’s ability and importance score, Fisher and colleagues SDL readiness scale (2),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18). However it was decided to use Williamson self-directed learning readiness scale (SDLRS) (17).

The identity of the participants was kept confidential. Students were encouraged to seek clarification, if needed.

Williamson self-directed learning readiness scale (SDLRS): This scale consists of 60 questions that measure eight factors- creativity, love of learning, initiative and independence in learning, openness to learning opportunities, acceptance of responsibility to one’s own learning, self-concept as an effective learner, ability to use basic study and problem solving skills and positive orientation to the future. The students were asked to describe themselves by indicating on the Likert scale, the extent to which the item was best descriptive of their individual characteristics where 1 would mean almost never true for me and 5 would mean almost always true for me. The score ranges from 60 to 300. After the total score was calculated, the students were grouped into three categories, based on their overall score as high, moderate and low score. The scoring range and interpretation of SDLR is shown in (Table/Fig 1) (17).

Statistical Analysis

The number of students in each category was then expressed in terms of percentage and data was analysed by Pearson’s chi square test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results

Out of the total 295 students, who took part in the study, 150 were boys and 145 were girls. The mean age of the students was 19.07±0.762 years. 40% (N=118) had high readiness scores, 52.88% (N=156) had moderate score and 7.12 % (N=21) had low score as is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

The results of this study (Table/Fig 2) show that 45.52 % of girls (N=66) had high readiness as compared to 34.67% boys (N=52) which means that girls are more ready for SDL than boys. However this was not statistically significant (p value 0.08). Since this study population comprised of medical (N=195) and paramedical students (N=100), both, it was found that Nursing and paramedical students appeared to be more ready for SDL than MBBS students as 52% (N=52/100) of nursing and paramedical students had a high score whereas only 33.85% (N=66/195) of medical students had a high score (Table/Fig 3) and this difference was statistically significant (p value <0.001).

Discussion

The results of this study showed that greater number of students (52.88%, N=156), had moderate readiness followed by high readiness (40% (N=118) and very few had low readiness scores. This is suggestive of the fact that most of the undergraduate students were ready for SDL or/& had individual characteristics appropriate for SDL. The results of this study are similar to the results of Prabakhar R et al., who in their study on 200 MBBS students of phase II and III MBBS found that 55% student have high readiness and phase III students had higher score as compared to phase II students (15) Walankar P and Panhale V had conducted a similar cross-sectional study on 288 undergraduate physiotherapy students and found that majority of the students (60.76%) had moderate levels of readiness and further the readiness scores were higher in clinical students as compared to the preclinical (19). These readiness scores can help the mentor to implement the teaching-learning methodologies keeping in mind the best interest of the students (16).

Assessing the students for SDL readiness is crucial as not all students possess the ideal learning aptitudes. Some students who are self-disciplined, organised, able to take constructive criticism are ideal for SDL .But there are so many other factors like family income, cultural factors, availability and utility of learning resources, premedical training, time management, etc that can impede SDL (2),(7),(10),(17),(18). Therefore areas of improvement must be identified, evaluated and a strategy must be framed and adopted accordingly, with the guidance of the mentor (17).

The results of present study are also in accordance to the previous studies conducted by Prabhakar R et al., Cadorin L et al.,Tekkol I and Demirel M; who showed that female students had higher readiness scores than male students (15),(20),(21) The reason for better scores in the females needs to be evaluated, however study by Tekkol I and Demirel M; have attributed this to the fact that females have higher cognitive awareness and motivational levels, have better time management skills and lifelong learning tendencies (21).

Some studies by Premkumar K et al., Gyawali S et al., Zeb S et al., Alfaifi M have however showed that there is no significant gender based difference in the SDL readiness (2),(22),(23),(24). Contradictory to this, a study by Kar S S et al., on fifth semester MBBS students showed that males had higher readiness for SDL as compared to females (25). Yang C et al in their study on medical students in China also found that male students to be more ready than females for SDL (10).

Limitation(s)

A small sample size may be considered to be the limitation of this study.

Conclusion

Most of the medical and paramedical students seem to be ready for self-directed learning, which is actually an encouraging thing for the teacher. Paramedics are more ready for SDL than medical students and female students seem to be more receptive for SDL as compared to male students. Determining the level of SDL readiness among the students would help the teachers to improve teaching-learning methodologies and focus more on students having low readiness for SDL. More such studies are needed to understand the correlation of the SDL scores with various demographic factors so that the purpose of SDL is fulfilled.

References

1.
El-Gilany AH, Abusaad FES. Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among Saudi undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):1040-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Premkumar K, Pahwa P, Banerjee A, Baptiste K, Bhatt H, Lim HJ. Does medical training promote or deter self-directed learning? A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Acad Med. 2013;88(11):1754-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Al-Najar H, Khalil AI, Bakar SAA, Aziz NSA . Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Versus Lecture based Learning (LBL): Effect on the development of critical thinking, problem solving and self directive learning skills in nursing students. J Nurs Care.2019;8(3):489-99.
4.
Hill M, Peters M, Salvaggio M, Vinnedge J, Darden A. Implementation and evaluation of a self-directed learning activity for first-year medical students. Medical Education Online. 2020;25(1):1717780. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Walton H. Small group methods in medical teaching. Medical Education. 1997;31:459-64. https://www.bumc.bu.edu/facdev-medicine/files/2010/06/small-group-teachng.pdf. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Tiwari A, Chan S, Wong E, Wong D, Chui C, Wong A, et al. The effect of problem-based learning on students’ approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26(5):430-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Badyal DK, Lata H, Sharma M, Jain AJ. Triple Cs of self-directed learning: Concept, conduct, and curriculum placement. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2020;7(4):235-39.
8.
Medical Council of India (MCI) competency based undergraduate curriculum for Indian medical graduate. 2018;1;20. https://www.nmc.org.in/information-desk/for-colleges/ug-curriculum/.
9.
Gazette - Regulations on Graduate Medical education, 2019. https://www.lawaudience.com/graduate-medical-education-regulations-amendment-2019-notified/.
10.
Yang C, Zhu Y, Jiang H, Qu B. Influencing factors of self-directed learning abilities of medical students of mainland China: A cross-sectional study. BMJ. 2021;11:e051590. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051590. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Nayak MK, Belle VS. Various methods of self-directed learning in medical education. MediSys Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;1(1):15-22. [crossref]
12.
Pushpa, Kumari N, Sagar V, Kashyap V, Kumar D. Understanding self directed learning for salvaging medical education during covid 19 lockdown. Int J Med Sci Educ. 2020;7(6):25-29.
13.
Guglielmino LM, Guglielmino PJ. Self-directed learning readiness scale. [Internet] Available at https://www.lpasdlrs.com/.
14.
Oddi LF. Development and validation of an instrument to identify self-directed continuing learners. Adult Educ Q. 1986;36(2):97-107. [crossref]
15.
Prabhakar R, Masilamani T, Ananthan VA. Self-directed learning readiness among II and III MBBS students in a tertiary teaching hospital. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2020;7(11):4584-91. [crossref]
16.
Fisher M, King J, Tague G. Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2001;21(7):516-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Williamson SN. Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse Res. 2007;14(2):66-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Premkumar K, Vinod E, Sathishkumar S, Pulimood A, Umaefulam V, Samuel P, et al. Self-directed learning readiness of Indian medical students: A mixed method study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1244-9. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Walankar P, Panhale V. Evaluation of self-directed learning readiness among undergraduate students in an Indian Physical Therapy Institute. International Journal of Science & Healthcare Research. 2021;6(3):01-06. [crossref]
20.
Cadorin L, Rei A, Dante A, Bulfone T, Viera G, Palese A. Enhancing self-directed learning among Italian nursing students: A pre- and post-intervention study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):746-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Tekkol İ, Demirel M. An Investigation of Self-Directed Learning Skills of Undergraduate Students. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Gayawali S, Jauhari A, Shankar P, Saha A, Ahmad M. Readiness for self directed learning among first semester students of a medical school in Nepal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5(1):20-23.
23.
Zeb S, Yusuf S, Mahmood RA, Zeb R. Gender based differences in self-directed learning readiness amongst medical students of Pakistan. RMJ. 2018;43:754-56.
24.
Alfaifi M. Self-directed learning readiness among undergraduate students at Saudi Electronic University in Saudi Arabia. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Digital Commons, University of South Florida 2016. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/6449/.
25.
Kar SS, Premarajan KC, Ramalingam A, Iswarya S, Sujiv A, Subitha L. Self-directed learning readiness among fifth semester MBBS students in a teaching institution of South India. Educ Health. 2014;27(3):289-92. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57749.16679

Date of Submission: May 13, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 27, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 23, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 24, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 22, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 28, 2022 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com