Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 118764

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : CC17 - CC21 Full Version

Relationship between Autonomic Functional Status and Maximal Aerobic Capacity


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56005.16753
Ravi Saini, Sudhanshu Kacker, Reshu Gupta

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. Senior Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Reshu Gupta,
Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: sainiravi414@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Modern autonomic function tests can assess the degree and spread of autonomic dysfunction non invasively. Cardiovagal, pseudomotor and adrenergic autonomic functions could be assessed in standard laboratory tests. Cardio-respiratory Fitness (CRF) also known as aerobic fitness or maximal aerobic power is typically reported as VO2 max.

Aim: To find the relationship between autonomic functional status and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max).

Materials and Methods: This observational study was conducted in the Research laboratory of Department of Physiology at RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur Rajasthan, India, from December 2020 to May 2021. The study included 100 apparently healthy students between 18-25 years of age and not practicing any form of exhaustive physical training (cycling, aerobic, skating, scuba diving, professional sports, track and field, water jogging, walking at 5 mph, competitive gymnasium). Autonomic functional status was assessed by various parasympathetic and sympathetic tests. VO2 max was assessed by treadmill test using Graded exercise protocol. To found a correlation between VO2 max and autonomic function test parameters, Pearson’s Pearson correlation test was done.

Results: The subjects had a mean age of 21.03±2.45 years, mean height of 1.64±0.08 m, mean weight of 59.66±11.15 kg and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 22.08±3.75 kg/m2. Mean height was 1.69±0.06 metre for male subjects and 1.58±0.06 metre for female subjects; mean weight was 62.52±9.52 kg for male subjects and 56.80±11.64 kg for female subjects. Mean BMI was 21.57±3.06 kg/m2 for male subjects and 22.59±4.3 kg/m2 for female subjects. Weak positive correlations were found between VO2 max and autonomic function test parameters, such as Valsalva ratio and hand grip blood pressure response, whereas weak negative correlations were found between VO2 max and Expiration/Inspiration (E/I) ratio ratio. VO2 max had a weak positive association (r-value=0.024) with Valsalva ratio and Blood pressure response to hand grip test (r-value=0.111), but a weak negative correlation (r-value=-0.019) with E/I ratio in males.

Conclusion: Regular aerobic exercise appears to be associated with decrease in sympathetic responses and increase in parasympathetic responses. The present study indicated the existence of gender differences in autonomic function tests in young adults of 18-25 years of age due to difference.

Keywords

Expiration/Inspiration ratio, Hand grip test, Valsalva ratio

The autonomic nervous system regulates important bodily functions as Blood Pressure (BP), heart rate, thermoregulation, respiration, gastrointestinal, bladder, and sexual function. Autonomic dysfunction can occur as a result of many diseases that affect autonomic pathways (1). Autonomic function tests can assess the severity and spread of autonomic dysfunction non invasively. Cardiovagal, psudomotor, and adrenergic autonomic functioning could be evaluated in standard laboratory tests (1). The need for autonomic function tests lies in the fact that patients with autonomic failure shows an increase in mortality (2). With the development of non invasive cardiovascular reflex function tests, now there is more systematic range available that is optimised for early diagnosis of autonomic neuropathy. These non invasive tests are, sensitive, specific, reproducible, quantitative, clinically relevant and less time consuming (3). The omnipresent nature of the autonomic nervous system has allowed tests to be described in various systems like-cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, urogenital, pupillary, sudomotor and neuroendocrine (4).

“Physical fitness” is a multi-dimensional state of being that usually refers to two aims: Performance that incorporates six skill-related fitness components and health that incorporates five health-related fitness components, each of which contributes to total quality of life. Among its components, great emphasis has been given to CRF, also known as aerobic fitness or maximal aerobic power (5). It is the overall capacity of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and the ability to carry out prolonged strenuous exercise (6). Amongst various other factors, regular physical activity is the key aspect to achieve optimal physical fitness. Insufficient physical activity is the risk factor for non communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, stroke, cancers and health outcomes such as mental health injuries and obesity (7).

Cardiovascular fitness has a pertinent role in not only athletic performance but also everyday activities such as walking, running and climbing stairs. In adults, fitness is a strong and independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and morbidity. Studies suggest that Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CRF) in young people is declining. Accurate measurement of CRF is essential to determine fitness levels and to monitor effects of intervention. The CRF is typically reported as VO2 max, the maximal oxygen uptake that can be achieved during maximal intensity exercise (8). A person’s maximum aerobic power (VO2 max) can be estimated by using direct or indirect methods. Direct method (laboratory method) measures VO2 max through direct analysis of the gases involved in pulmonary ventilation, while performing progressive and maximal exercise tests. Indirect methods estimate a person’s aerobic capacity based off their heart rate, their distance covered, and or their time of trial when using a certain protocol (9).

One of the mechanisms for the association between autonomic functions and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max) may be alterations in cardiac autonomic nervous system functions, which can be assessed by sympathetic and parasympathetic tests (10). Modulation of autonomic functions mainly cardio-vagal response to aerobic exercise in term of VO2 max observed by many previous studies (11). Higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were linked to improve cardiac autonomic nervous system function in children and adolescents, according to a recent comprehensive literature review (12). However, the literature review pointed out that the evidence for an association between maximal aerobic capacity and autonomic nervous system function is still limited, and it called for more research into the full range of autonomic functions and VO2 max and other physiological mechanisms for the link, such as muscle mass, biological maturation (12). In previous studies indirect method for observing maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max) is being used very frequently due to its easy, safe, quick and feasible approach. In contrary, direct method by gas analyser can be more reliable (13),(14). Hence, the present study was designed to find association between autonomic functions and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max) by using direct method.

Material and Methods

This observational study was conducted in the Research laboratory of Department of Physiology at RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur Rajasthan, India, from December 2020 to May 2021. The ethical clearance was obtained by Institutional Ethical Committee (EC/P-31/2020). An informed consent was obtained from all participants after adequate explanation of the procedure to be followed during the study. A total of 100 healthy young adults were enrolled in the study by convenience sampling.

Inclusion criteria: Apparently healthy young adult subjects (50 males and 50 females) aged between 18-25 years and not practicing any form of exhaustive physical training (cycling, aerobic, skating, scuba diving, professional sports, track and field, water jogging, walking at 5 mph, competitive gymnasium) were recruited for study.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with history of hospitalisation in the last three months, smokers and alcoholic, individuals suffering from hypertension, diabetes and other psychological disorders, cardiac disorders, respiratory disorder such as asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), pneumothorax, respiratory tract infection and musculoskeletal disorders and those on medications that affect cardiovascular control were excluded.

Study Procedure

Basic demographic parameters including height, weight, gender and age were taken from all participants. Prior to the measurement, all subjects were instructed to fast overnight and refrain from exercising for 48 hours. They were requested to abstain from drinking tea and coffee or consuming caffeine for the preceding 24 hours. To assess the autonomic functional status, various parasympathetic and sympathetic tests were done.

Valsalva maneuver test: Subject was asked to blow in rubber tube of mercury manometer and maintain the pressure of 40 mmHg for 15 second. Continuous Electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded 1 min before the strain, during strain and 45 sec after the strain. The ratio was taken as maximum R-R interval after maneuver to that of shortest R-R interval during the strain (15).

Deep breath test Expiration/Inspiration (E/I) ratio: The participant was asked to breathe deeply in sitting position at the rate of 6 breaths/min allowing 5 sec each for inspiration and expiration. Continuous ECG was recorded during this period and the ratio was calculated as maximum R-R interval for expiration to that of shortest R-R interval during inspiration (16).

Hand grip test: the participant was asked to hold the hand grip dynamometer in the dominant hand and press it with maximum effort. The tension developed, taken as the maximum isometric tension (T max). The subject was asked to maintain 30% of the T max for 35 minutes. The blood pressure was recorded from the non exercising arm every 30 sec before the release of hand grip. Maximum increase in BP before the release of hand grip was noted (17).

Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max): VO2 max was measured by using treadmill test in accordance with graded exercise protocol (18). Following a 3 min walking (warm up stage) at 0% elevation, 18subject was asked to brisk walk at self-selected speed (between 4.3-7.5 mph) at same incline for three minutes and then with a constant speed, treadmill grade was increased by 2.5% every minute until a steady state Heart Rate (HR) of 180 beats per minute was achieved or subject become fatigue and was unable to continue the exercise. During the procedure, equipment was connected to a monitor screen, which showed various values such as Volume of oxygen (VO2), Volume of carbon dioxide (VCO2), Resting Energy Expenditure (REE), Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER), Metabolic Equivalent of Tasks (METs) for every 10 seconds. However only VO2 max was evaluated in the study.

Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): The GPAQ (19) collected information on sedentary behaviour and physical activity participation (19). Metabolic Equivalents (METs) are evaluated in the analysis of GPAQ data. The intensity of physical activities is commonly expressed as METs. The GPAQ consists of 16 questions (P1-P16) in three domains of activity at work; travel to and from places and recreational activities. While using GPAQ data to calculate a person who was moderately active is allocated four METs, while for the person who spent time in vigorous activities was assigned eight METs.

Total time spent and energy expenditure in MET is calculated in all three domains of activity. Total time spent in physical activities per week is the sum of the time spent in all five settings in one week, whereas total energy expenditure or MET per week is the sums of the energy spent in one week.

• A person is said to be having sedentary lifestyle if the total activities performed by a person in a week are less than any of the conditions:
-150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity
OR
-75 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity
OR
- An equivalent combination of moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity physical activity achieving atleast 600 MET-minutes.
• Adult can be categorised in physically active category if METminutes per week are ≥600 (physical activity cut-off value) (19).

Statistical Analysis

The results of study were presented as Mean±SD. Data were compared between genders using unpaired Student’s t-test. To found a correlation between VO2 max and autonomic function test parameters, Pearson’s correlation test was done. Analysis were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 (Chicago, Inc., USA), and significance level for p-value was calculated ≤0.05.

Results

The subjects had a mean age of 21.03±2.45 years, height of 1.64±0.08 m, and weight of 59.66±11.15 kg and BMI of 22.08±3.75 kg/m2. Mean height was 1.69±0.06 m for male subjects and 1.58±0.06 m for female subjects; mean weight was 62.52±9.52 kg for male subjects and 56.80±11.64 kg for female subjects. The differences of mean height and weight were found to be statistically significant (Table/Fig 1).

Total 100 subjects equally distributed in either gender (male and female) were included in the study and were subjected to various autonomic function test parameter. Mean±SD of Valsalva ratio was 1.43± 0.25, E/I ratio was 1.30±0.06 and blood pressure response to hand grip test was 22.22±6.39 mmHg. Distribution of different autonomic function test parameters as Valsalva ratio was 1.44±0.26 for male subjects and 1.41±0.23 for female subjects. Mean±SD of E/I ratio was 1.28±0.06 for male subjects and 1.31±0.06 for female subjects. Mean blood pressure response to hand grip test was 26.28±6.19 mmHg for male subjects and 18.16±3.25 mmHg for female subjects.The differences of mean E/I ratio and hand grip test were found to be statistically significant (Table/Fig 2).

Distribution of Mean±SD of GPAQ score was 1588.6±747.10 MET per week and VO2 max was 41.58±9.02 mL/kg/min. GPAQ Score was 1754±820.93 (MET) for male subjects and 1347.4±577.10 (MET) for female subjects. VO2 max was 45.69±8.57 mL/kg/min for male subjects, 37.47±7.50 mL/kg/min for female subjects and this difference was statistically significant (Table/Fig 3).

According to the results, weak positive correlation of VO2 max with Valsalva ratio for both male (r-value=0.024) and female (r-value=0.221) subjects were found. Similarly weak positive correlation of VO2 max with hand grip BP response (mmHg) for both male (r-value=0.111) and female (r-value=0.016) subjects were found. But in case of E/I ratio weak negative correlation for both male subjects (r-value=-0.019) and female subjects (r-value=-0.016) were found. None of the associations were found to be statistically significant (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The subjects had a mean age of 21.03±2.45 years, height of 1.64±.08 m, and weight of 59.66±11.15 kg and BMI of 22.08±3.75 kg/m2. Mean height was 1.69±0.06 m for male subjects and 1.58±0.06 m for female subjects which was found statistically significant (p-value <0.0001). Mean BMI of total subjects in the present study was found to be 22.08±3.75 kg/m2, which is slightly higher than the BMI found in another study conducted by Chhabra P and Chhabra SK, where all subjects of same age group were under normal weight category (20). No significant difference was found in the subjects of two studies. Similarly, mean BMI for male and female subjects was 21.57±3.06 and 22.59±4.3 kg/m2 respectively in the present study, which is again slightly higher than the BMI of Indian healthy young male and female subjects.

In the present study, autonomic functional status was assessed by autonomic function tests. Mean Valsalva ratio for total subjects was found slightly lower to normal values mentioned by Mishra UK and Kalita J (21). The present study results were similar with those in another study conducted by Gautschy B et al., on healthy young adults. In their study, individual values were >1.23 in 97.5% of subjects of similar age group (22). The present study results were in contrast with those of Piha SJ, who reported higher Valsalva ratio (23). Males had higher Valsalva ratio than females which may be due to lower heart rate in adult males than adult females. The size of the heart, which is normally smaller in females than males, accounts for the majority of the variation. Because the female heart pumps less blood with each beat, it must beat quicker to match the output of the bigger male heart. Furthermore, the pacemaker in women’s hearts has a distinct inherent rhythmicity, causing them to beat quicker (24).

In the present study mean E/I ratio for total subjects was found higher than the study conducted by Ziegler D et al., (25). In the deep breathing test females had higher E/I ratio than males and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.05). This might be due to a developmental difference or the influence of male and female sex hormone levels (26). Oestrogen has a calming impact on the heart and circulatory system. It raises vagal tone while decreasing sympathetic activity via increasing the density and activity of muscarinic receptors (27).

Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) increase to hand grip test for total subjects was lower than the values observed by Piha SJ (23). Males had significantly higher DBP responses than females (p-value <0.01) indicating that men had greater forearm muscle strength than women. This might be attributed to the hormone testosterone, which promotes an increase in muscle growth and protein synthesis in boys during puberty, resulting in a 50% increase in muscle mass on average. In comparison to males, females have a greater amount of oestrogen, which dampens the decrease of cardio vagal tone to the heart during exercise, resulting in a considerably smaller DBP response and less sympathetic activity during exercise (28). According to the previous studies, the concentration of epinephrine is very high in men on beginning of exercise explains the significant increase in the rise of DBP response in males than females (29). These findings are in accordance with the previous studies (30).

Mean maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max) for males was greater than females and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.01). Greater muscle mass in men is partly responsible for their higher absolute VO2 max compared to women, as muscle is the largest consumer of oxygen during exercise. These discrepancies are attributable to central oxygen delivery constraints induced by decreased cardiac outputs as a result of smaller stroke volumes and poorer oxygen carrying capabilities. Women’s oxygen carrying capacity is reduced due to lower haemoglobin levels (31). VO2 max in the present study was found to be higher in males than females which were similar to results of a study conducted by Loe H et al., However, the mean values of VO2 max were found to be lower for both male and female participants as compared to above mentioned study. This may be due to different age groups (20-29 years) recruited by Loe H et al., who had of high level of physical activity (32).

Regular physical activity is the most important part of physical fitness, which may be quantified using maximum aerobic capacity (VO2 max). The GPAQ can measure moderate to vigorous physical activity. As a result, GPAQ may be used to relate subjective measurement of physical activity to physical fitness. Adult can be categorised in physically active category if MET minutes per week are ≥600. The mean GPAQ score of total subjects under the present study was 1588.6±747.10 MET per week and that of male and female subjects was 1754±820.93 MET per week and 1347.35±577.1 MET per week, respectively and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.05) as male subjects were more active than female subjects. Overall subjects were falling under the category of physically active individuals (33).The authors correlated the maximum aerobic capacity (measured by VO2 max) with autonomic function test values. VO2 max had a weak positive association (r-value=0.024) with Valsalva ratio and hand grip blood pressure response (r-value=0.111), but a weak negative correlation (r-value=-0.019) with E/I ratio. All these were statistically non significant. Higher values of mean RR intervals are associated with high maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max) due to changes in the intrinsic processes operating on the sinus node, as well as changes in the autonomic nervous system’s regulation of the heart (34).

Male (r-value=0.111) and female (r-value=0.016) had a weak positive association between VO2 max with hand grip blood pressure response (mmHg). Similar weak positive association was found in the study conducted by Kilbom A and Persson J, for blood pressure response to exercise (35). Exercise training decreases baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity and causes parallel reductions of arterial pressure and sympathetic tone (36). The initial response to exercise, up to a heart rate of approximately 100 beats/min, is attributable to the withdrawal of vagal tone but moderate and heavy exercise causes augmented sympathetic activity (37). Similarly, in the present study, authors used maximal level exercise, which may be the reason for increased sympathetic activity.

Male (r-value=-0.019) and female participants (r-value=-0.079) had a weak negative association with E/I ratio. This could be due to irregular physical activity and maximal level of exercise test. In a research done by Aboudrar S et al., athletes of similar age group were observed with a greater E/I ratio which shows regular aerobic exercise appears to be associated with considerable decreases in heart rates (increased parasympathetic activity) both at rest and during submaximal activity (38).

Limitation(s)

Sample size in the study was small and included only healthy young adult population.

Conclusion

The present study indicated the existence of gender differences in autonomic function tests in young adults. VO2 max was found higher in males than females. Weak positive correlation was observed between VO2 max with Valsalva ratio and hand grip BP response and weak negative correlation was seen between VO2 max with E/I ratio. This concludes that regular aerobic exercise appears to be associated with decrease in sympathetic responses and increase in parasympathetic responses. Further research on a bigger population with a broader range of age group is recommended for external validity of the results. More research into the broader range of autonomic functions, maximal aerobic capacity and other physiological parameters including muscle mass, biological maturity is needed.

References

1.
Low PA, Tomalia VA, Park KJ. Autonomic function tests: Some clinical applications. J Clin Neurol. 2013;9(1):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ewing DJ, Campbell IW, Clarke BF. Assessment of cardiovascular effects in diabetic autonomic neuropathy and prognostic implications. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92 (2 Pt 2):308-11. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Low PA. Autonomic nervous system function. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;10(1):14-27. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Assessment: Clinical autonomic testing. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 1996;46(3):873-80.
5.
Armstrong N. Aerobic fitness of children and adolescents. Jornal de Pediatria. 2006;82(6):406-08. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Shephard RJ, Allen C, Benade AJ, Davies CT, Di Prampero PE, Hedman R, et al. Bull World Health Organ.1968;38(5):757-64.
7.
World Health Organization: Global health risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected Geneva. 2009.
8.
Mashili FL, Kagaruki GB, Mbatia J, Nanai A, Saguti G, Maongezi S, et al. Physical activity and associated socioeconomic determinants in Rural and urbanTanzania: Result from 2012 WHO-STEP survey. Internatioan Journal of Popolation Research. 2018;(1):01-10. [crossref]
9.
Carter JG, Brooks KA, Sparks JR. Comparison of the YMCA cycle sub-maximal VO2 max test to a treadmill VO2 max test. International Journal of Exercise Science. 2011;5(11):121-29.
10.
Ziemssen T, Siepmann T. The Investigation of the cardiovascular and sudomotor autonomic nervous system—A review. Front Neurol. 2019;10:53. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Boutcher SH, Park Y, Dunn SL, Boutcher YN. The relationship between cardiac autonomic function and maximal oxygen uptake response to high-intensity intermittent-exercise training. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2013;31(9):1024-29. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Oliveira RS, Barker AR, Wilkinson KM, Abbott RA, Williams CA. Is cardiac autonomic function associated with cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in children and adolescents? A systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:113-22. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Buttar KK, Saboo N, kacker S. Maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) estimation using direct and indirect method in Indian population: A pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(2):CC06-08. [crossref]
14.
de Rocha Neto AM, Herdy AH, de Souza P. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect methods for the determination of maximal oxygen uptake in sedentary young adults. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2019;32(4):362-67. https://doi.org/10.5935/2359-4802.20190052. [crossref]
15.
Derbes VJ, Kerr A Jr. Valsalva’s maneuver and Weber’s experiment. N Engl J Med. 1955;253:822-23.
16.
Ewing DJ, Hume L, Campbell IW, Murray A, Neilson JM, Clarke BF, et al. Autonomic mechanisms in the initial heart rate response to standing. J Appl Physiol. 1980;49:809-14. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Jahan N, Deepak KK, Kaushal N, Paudel BH. Effect of graded head-up tilt on parasympathetic reactivity. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996;40(4):309-17.
18.
Beltz NM, Gibson AL, Janot JM, Kravitz L, Mermier CM, Dalleck LC, et al. Graded exercise testing protocols for the determination of VO2 max: Historical perspectives, progress, and future considerations. Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016, Article ID 3968393, 12 pages. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3968393. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
World Health Organization. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide, 2018.
20.
Chhabra P, Chhabra SK. Distribution and determinants of body mass index of non-smoking adults in Delhi, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;5(3):294-01.
21.
Mishra UK, Kalita J. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2006. Chapter 3, Autonomic nervous system testing; p.114-28.
22.
Gautschy B, Weidmann P, Gnädingeret MP. Autonomic function tests in normal man. Klin Wochenschr. 1986;64:499-05. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Piha SJ. Cardiovascular responses to various autonomic tests in males and females. Clinical Autonomic Research.1993;3(1):15-20. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Dirk R, Ector H, Aubert AE, Rubens A, Werf FV. Heart rate variability and heart rate in healthy volunteers. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(9):1334-41. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Ziegler D, Laux G, Dannehl K, Spüler M, Mühlen H, Mayer P, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular autonomic function: Age-related normal ranges and reproducibility of spectral analysis, vector analysis, and standard tests of heart rate variation and blood pressure responses. Diabetic Medicine. 1992;9:166-75. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Dart AM, Xiao-Jun Du, Kingwell BA. Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system. Cardiovas Res. 2002;53(3):678-87. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Simerly RB, Chang C, Muramatsu M, Swansonet LW. Distribution of androgen and estrogen receptor mRNA- containing cells in the rat brain: An in situ hybridization study. J Comp Neurol. 1990;294(1):76-95. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Wong SW, Kemmerly DS, Nicholas M, Menon RS, Cechetto DF, Shoemaker JK. Sex Difference in forebrain and cardiovagal responses at the onset of isometric handgrip exercise: A retrospective fMRI study. J Appl Physiology. 2007;103(4):1402-11. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Boone T, Robergs RA, Astorino TA, Baker JS, Goulet ED, Gotshall RW, et al. Gender differences in cardiovascular responses to isometric exercise in seated and supine positions. JEP Online. 2005;8(4):29-35.
30.
Matthews KA, Stoney CM. Influences of sex and age on cardiovascular responses during stress. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1988;50(1):46-56. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Perez-Gomez J, Rodriguez GV, Ara I, Olmedillas H, Chavarren J, González-Henriquez JJ, et al. Role of muscle mass on sprint performance: Gender differences. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(6):685-94. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Loe H, Rognmo O, Saltin B, Wisløffet U. Aerobic capacity reference data in 3816 healthy men and women 20-90 years. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64319. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064319. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Phillips DB, Ehnes CM, Stickland MK, Petersen SR. Ventilatory responses in males and females during graded exercise with and without thoracic load carriage. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2019;119(2):441-53. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Plews DJ, Laursen PB, Stanley J, Kilding AE, Bucheit M. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: Opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Med. 2013;43(9):773-81. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Kilbom A, Persson J. Cardiovascular response to combined dynamic and static exercise. Circ Res. 1981;48(6 Pt 2):I93-97.
36.
O’sullivan SE, Bell C. The effects of exercise and training on human cardiovascular reflex control. J Auton Nerv Syst. 2000;81(1-3):16-24. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Goldsmith RL, Bloomfield DM, Rosenwinkel ET. Exercise and autonomic function. Coronary Artery Disease. 2000;(2):129-35. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Aboudrar S, Rkain H, Errguig L, Radjab Y, Oukerraj L, Azzaoui A, et al. Young footballers, assessed by deep breathing test, have a higher vagal response. Open Journal of Molecular and Integrative Physiology. 2012;2:61-64.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56005.16753

Date of Submission: Mar 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 28, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 13, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 09, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 13, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 02, 2022 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com