Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 104813

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : LC22 - LC26 Full Version

Utilisation of Antenatal Care Services and its Determinants among Pregnant Women Attending Tertiary Care Hospital in Western India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58290.16755
Nitin Lodha

1. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Shantabaa Medical College, Amreli, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Nitin Lodha,
14, Jagdish Park Society Part 1, Behrampura, Ahmedabad-380022, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: nitinlodha17@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Good quality Antenatal Care (ANC) is not uniformly distributed in the community. A better ANC coverage not only ensures a safer outcome from pregnancy but also provides a platform for improving the health status of mother and baby.

Aim: To assess the utilisation of ANC services among the pregnant women and to study the associated factors related to utilisation of ANC.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted among 250 full term pregnant women in tertiary care hospital in Vadnagar, Gujarat, India from June 2021 to August 2021. Systemic random sampling technique was adapted to select required participants. Women were interviewed, using predesigned and pretested semi-structured proforma, to assess the ANC received by them. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and proportions, continuous variables as mean and standard deviation. Chi-square test was used to found association between comprehensive ANC and various determinants affecting it and logistic regressions were applied to find out the predictors.

Results: Mean age of the participants were 25.31±4.09 years. A total of 205 (82%) of participants were literate and 210 (84%) pregnant women were from rural area. About 69.2% participants belonged to joint family and 92.4% were housewife. Majority of the participants were from class IV (63.6%) and V (16%) socio-economic class. About 66% participants were multigravida. All study participants were registered. A 87.2% women had early registration of pregnancy (within 12 weeks), 93.6% had atleast four ANC visits, 98.4% had taken two doses or one booster dose of Tetnus Toxoid (TT) injections and 71.2% women had taken minimum 100 iron and folic acid tablets. Total 69.2% of the mothers had received the full ANC. Significant relation was found between utilisation of full ANC with age of women, residence area, education, socio-economic class and parity.

Conclusion: Full ANC utilisation was inadequate. Most of the indicators seemed better, only Iron Folic Acid (IFA) tablets consumption was poor. There is a need for intensified and targeted awareness programs for pregnant women on the importance of antenatal visits and utilisation of various services.

Keywords

Antenatal care visit, Early registration, Iron folic acid, Pregnancy

Healthy newborn in any community depends mainly on ANC received by the mother during her pregnancy. Also, maternal mortality and neonatal mortality in a community is influenced by antenatal services provided and utilised in the community. The primary aim of ANC is to achieve at the end of pregnancy a healthy mother and a healthy baby by promoting, protecting and maintaining health of the mother during pregnancy, by identifying high risk cases and by foreseeing complications to prevent them early (1). ANC can be defined as care provided by skilled healthcare professionals to pregnant women in order to ensure the best health conditions for both mother and baby during pregnancy. The components of ANC include: risk identification, prevention and management of pregnancy related or concurrent diseases, health education and health promotion. ANC reduces maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality both directly, through detections, and indirectly, through identification of women at increased risk of developing complications during labour and delivery, thus ensuring referral to an appropriate level of healthcare (2).

The country has been witnessing a progressive reduction in Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR). MMR of India has declined over the years to 103 in 2017 to 2019 from 113 in 2016 to 2018, 122 in 2015 to 2017 and 130 in 2014 to 2016, as per Special Bulletin on MMR released by the Registrar General of India. With this persistent decline, India is on the verge of achieving National Health Policy-2017 target of 100/lakh live births by 2020 and certainly on track to achieve the sustainable development goals target of 70/lakh live births by 2030 (3). Although the health status of women has improved over the years due to concentrated efforts of Government, it is still not at par with the international benchmark and is unacceptably high. Health outcome goals established in the 12th five-year plan are to reduce infant mortality rate to 25 per 1000 live births, to reduce MMR to 100 per 100,000 live births by 2017 but this goal of MMR is still not achieved, currently it is 103 per 100,000 live births (4). In India, the results of a large-scale nationwide cross-sectional survey (2015-2016) revealed that full ANC was provided to only 21% women during their previous pregnancy (5). Recently, a study done by Rustagi R et al., observed 53% participants had comprehensive ANC service utilisation (6).

A good quality ANC service is not uniformly distributed in society. There is a sharp distinction between states and between rural and urban areas. Full utilisation of ANC services is highest in Lakshadweep (65.88%), while it was lowest in Nagaland (2.36%). Similarly in rural area utilisation of ANC services was low as compared to urban area. In rural areas, early registration was 76.1%, minimum four ANC visits was 44.8%, TT vaccination coverage was 82.4% and IFA tablets consumption was 25.9% only, while in urban areas, early registration was 82.3%, minimum four ANC visits was 66.4%, TT vaccination was 84.4% and IFA tablets consumption was 40.8% (5),(7). This could be related to non utilisation or underutilisation of maternal healthcare services, especially amongst rural poor and urban slum due to inaccessibility, illiteracy, cultural factors which have significant relationship as a determinant of maternal and child health in population (8),(9). Pregnant mothers who do not receive good quality ANC services have been found to be more at risk of having low birth weight babies and there is clear association between perinatal mortality rate, infant mortality rate and lack of or poor quality of ANC (10). Better ANC service coverage not only ensures a safer outcome from pregnancy but also provides a platform for improving health status of mother and baby as both are considered as a single unit (11),(12).

Successful implementation of all maternal health related programs depend on adequate awareness and understanding of determinants that affects the utilisation of ANC services during pregnancy. To improve maternal health, barriers that limit access to quality maternal health services must be identified and addressed at all levels of health system. With this background, the present study was conducted with an aim to assess utilisation of ANC services and various determinants that affects utilisation of ANC services among full term pregnant women and recently delivered women.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted among full term pregnant women in tertiary care hospital in Vadnagar, Gujarat, India. The study was carried out from June 2021 to August 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of Medical College (IECHR/APPROVAL/2967/2021).

Inclusion criteria: Full term pregnant women who came for routine antenatal check-up in Obstetric Outpatient Department (OPD) and recently delivered women admitted in a tertiary care hospital were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women who were severely ill, and not willing to participate in the study were excluded.

Sample size calculation: As per National Family Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4) data, the mothers who had comprehensive ANC care in Gujarat was 30.66%. Based on this prevalence and at 95% confidence interval, with a precision of 10%, the required calculated sample size was around 228 which were rounded off to 250 subjects (5). Systemic random sampling technique was adapted to select recently delivered women and full term pregnant women who came for antenatal check-up.

Study Procedure

Before taking information, informed consent was obtained from study participants and they were assured of confidentiality and privacy of records. Full-term women attending the obstetric OPD as well as those who were admitted in the obstetric ward in the hospital were interviewed. Data collection was done through oral questionnaire method using predesigned and pretested semi-structured proforma, validated by an expert. The questionnaire contained two parts. Part 1 consisted of details regarding socio-demographic and obstetric profile of participants, while part 2 contained questions regarding ANC utilisation during current pregnancy. For ANC utilisation, information was recorded that included-registration of pregnancy, number of antenatal visits, tetanus vaccination, and IFA tablets consumption. Socio-economic status was assessed as per Modified BG Prasad Classification (13). Mamta card of pregnant women was asked for recording required information (5).

Comprehensive ANC was defined as registration of pregnancy within 12 weeks, attending a healthcare facility for atleast four ANC visits, taking two doses of tetanus toxoid, and atleast 100 days of iron-folic acid tablet consumption (14),(15),(16).

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using MS excel 2010 version and Epi info version 7.2.5.0. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and proportions, continuous variables as mean and standard deviation. Chi-square test was used to found association and logistic regressions were applied to find out the predictors. Results 23were expressed in terms of odds ratio and Confidence Interval (CI). The p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The total study participants were 250 pregnant women. The mean age of the participants were 25.31±4.09 years. Majority of the participants 204 (81.6%) were Hindu, 178 (71.2%) had education upto primary level, 210 (84%) were from rural area, and 173 (69.2%) belonged to joint family. Total of 63.6% participants were from the class IV socio-economic status. Most of the participants (92.4%) were housewives and around 60% of participant’s husbands had education upto primary school. Majority (66%) were multigravida, and among them 72.1% had pregnancy interval ≤3 years (Table/Fig 1).

All study participants were registered and all women had their Mamta card. Total 218 (87.2%) women had early registration of pregnancy, and 12.8% women had pregnancy registration after first trimester. About 234 (93.6%) participants had atleast four ANC visits during this pregnancy. Most of the study participants (98.4%) had taken two doses or one booster dose of TT injections. About 178 (71.2%) women had taken minimum hundred IFA tablets during their antenatal period (Table/Fig 2). About 173 (69.2%) of the mothers had received the full ANC (had early registration of pregnancy, minimum of four ANC visits, taken two doses or one booster dose of TT and taken 100 IFA tablets).

On comparison between profiles of the women who had utilisation of full ANC and who did not, significant difference was found with age, education, residence area, socio-economic class, parity and pregnancy interval (Table/Fig 3). On simple logistic regression, significant relation was found between utilisation of full ANC with age, residence area, education, socio-economic class and parity. Women with age >25 years, from rural area, higher education, socio-economic class, and high parity were found to be more likely to get full ANC services (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Antenatal Care (ANC) is the care of woman during her pregnancy. ANC is one of the most effective health interventions for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity. ANC provides a unique opportunity for screening and diagnosis, health promotion and disease prevention among the pregnant women. Also, utilisation of ANC services and institutional delivery are dependent on so many factors like social, cultural and administrative factors. Present study was intended at exploring the utilisation of ANC services and to find out its determinants among women. Analysis of data brings out that majority of the participants were from 21-30 years of age group. Majority of them were literates with only 18% were illiterate. Majority of participants were from rural area. This information is required to understand the target audience. Majority of the participants belonged to lower socio-economic class. Most of them lived in joint family. Most of the women were housewife. Around one third of women were primigravida and in those women who were multigravida, majority of women had pregnancy interval less than 3 years. Similar demographic characteristic were also reported by Kumar H et al., Roy MP et al., and Sruthi MV and Bablu R in their studies (17),(18),(19).

The study found that all the studied participants got themselves registered and all had Mamta card. The extent of registration was in accordance with finding of previous studies done by Chethana K et al., and Madhu K et al., (20),(21). Early registration of pregnancy was seen in 87.2% participants. Tellis SB et al., recorded early registration was 78.3% which was lower than present study finding (22). Early registration has very much impact on outcome of pregnancy in term of health of both mother as well as her baby. Early registration provide a good opportunity to provide package of antenatal service in early phase of pregnancy, in this study it is around 87.2% which needs to improve and reached upto 100%. Current study revealed that 93.6% participants had the minimum four antenatal visits, which was similar to the results obtained by Chethana K et al., where 91.5% had completed minimum four antenatal visits (20). Swetha NB et al., reported 98.6% had minimum four antenatal visits, which higher than current study (23). TT immunisation among participants was 98.4%. This finding was in accordance with finding of Chethana K et al., in which they reported 98.6% coverage (20). However Kumar H et al., observed 89.8% coverage which was lower than finding of current study (17). Adequate IFA supplementation was received by 71.2% of the women, which was similar to the finding of Swetha NB et al., and Poornima C and Ranganath TS [23,24]. On further investigation, present study found that the reasons for incomplete or partial consumption of IFA tablets said by women were the side-effects of tablets, forgetfulness and very few reported limited supply.

In connection with the objective of study, it was found that comprehensive ANC utilisation was seen among 69.2% participants and it was lacking in nearly one third of the participants. This finding was consistence with finding of Mumbare SS and Rege R who observed 64.76% adequate utilisation of ANC services (25). Similar study done by Rustagi R et al., observed 53% participants receiving comprehensive ANC (6). The most potential reason for not receiving comprehensive ANC was found to be lack of awareness about full ANC package, other reasons was fear of side-effects of TT injections and IFA tablets. On comparison with similar other few studies that done in last decade, it was seen that early registration was highest in present study and Kakati R et al., observed lowest (53%) finding (26). Similarly ≥4 antenatal visit among participant also better in current study as compared to other study except study done by Swetha NB et al., in which they reported 98.6% participant had ≥4 antenatal visit (23). TT vaccination was very high and nearly same in all mentioned study. There was wide variation seen among participants regarding IFA consumption, Mohanty S et al., reported highest IFA consumption status, while present study reported only 71.2% IFA consumption (27). Full ANC utilisation was seen in 69.2% participants which was higher (53%), than the finding of Rustagi R et al., but lower (81% ) than those of Chethana K et al., (Table/Fig 5) (6),(17),(20),(23),(26),(27).

Statistically significant association was found between full ANC with age, education, residence area, socio-economic class, parity and pregnancy interval. Roy MP et al., also found significant association between ANC utilisation with education and socio-economic class (18). Education of women has very much impact in increasing ANC services utilisation, by increasing awareness among women regarding available health services we can improve ANC utilisation. In rural area utilisation of ANC services were better as compared to urban area, this was mainly because in urban most of women were working and they had no enough time for ANC check-up. Similarly ANC utilisation was seen more in multigravida women as compared to primigravida, which may be because multigravida women had adequate awareness about ANC services and also they had enough experience of ANC care during previous pregnancy. On simple logistic regression, significant relation was found between utilisation of full ANC with age, residence area, education, socio-economic class and parity. Women with age ≥26 years, women from rural area, higher education, socio-economic class, and high parity were found to be more likely to get full ANC services. Chethana K et al., also found significant association of full ANC usage with education of women (17). Lower maternal education correlated with suboptimal ANC utilisation. Though the comprehensive ANC utilisation was 69.2% in current study it need to improve and to achieve the goal of healthy mother and health baby it must be reach upto 100%.

Limitation(s)

The present study was hospital-based study in which pregnant females who came to tertiary care government hospital were included, pregnant female who attend private hospitals were not included hence the findings cannot be considered as true representation of the community. Further, recall bias was problem because there were questions regarding their pregnancy and ANC services utilisation. Lack of information regarding pregnancy with adverse outcome like abortion, miscarriage etc., cannot be commented on utilisation of ANC in pregnancies with adverse outcome.

Conclusion

The present study reports that only 69.2% participants availed the full ANC services, but as compared to other studies done in the recent past, the service utilisation has improved. Although around one third of the participants did not receive full ANC services, utilisation of ANC services like early registration, four or more antenatal visit and TT immunisation was good. Women with higher age, rural area, higher education, socio-economic class, and high parity were found to be more likely to get full ANC services. This emphasises importance of female literacy and its positive effect on women and child health.

The study brings out the need for intensified and targeted awareness programs for pregnant women on the importance of antenatal visits and utilisation of various services. Immediate steps need to be taken to educate females about maternal and child health programmes and motivate them to utilise ANC services. Taking into consideration the factors that associated with low and inequitable utilisation, it is imperative to develop strategies to address the inadequacies and inequitable distribution of healthcare services, in order to achieve the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations at the earliest.

References

1.
Satheesh BC, Rajeev KH. A study on evaluation of utilization of antenatal care services in a rural area of North Kerala, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5:4415-18. [crossref]
2.
Park K. Park’s Text book Preventive & Social Medicine. 25th ed. Jabalpur: M/s Babsaridas Bhanot; 2019:575.
3.
Special Bulletin on Maternal Mortality in India 2017-19. Sample Registration System Office of Registrar General, India. 2022. Available at: https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/SRSMMB. Accessed on 2nd May 2022.
4.
Patel BB, Gurmeet P, Sinalkar DR, Pandya KH, Mahen A, Singh N, et al. A study on knowledge and practices of antenatal care among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at a tertiary care hospital of Pune, Maharashtra. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2016;9:354-62. [crossref]
5.
International Institute for Population Sciences, ICF. National Family Health Surve\ (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. International Institute for Population Sciences;2017. Accessed on May 3, 2022. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/national-family-health-survey-nfhs-4-2015-16-india/
6.
Rustagi R, Basu S, Garg S, Singh M, Mala YM. Utilization of antenatal care services and its sociodemographic correlates in urban and rural areas in Delhi, India. Eur J Midwifery. 2021;5(Sep):40. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kumar G, Choudhary TS, Srivastava A, Upachyay R, Taneja S, Bahl R, et al. Utilisation, equity and determinants of full antenatal care in India: Analysis from the National Family Health Survey 4, BMC Preg and Childbirth. 2019;19:327. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Agarwal P, Singh MM, Garg S. Maternal health care utilization among women in an urban slum in Delhi. Indian J Comm Med. 2007;32(3):203-05. [crossref]
9.
Singh KK, Pandey N, Gautam A. Effect of breastfeeding and maternal health care programme on infant mortality. Demography India. 2007;36(2):253-66.
10.
Rode SJ. Effect of complete antenatal care on birth weight of children in india: Evidence from National Family Health Survey (NFHS) Data. J Women’s Health Care. 2018;7(1):01-12. [crossref]
11.
Jat TR, Ng N, San Sebastian M. Factors affecting the use of maternal health services in Madhya Pradesh state of India: A multilevel analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:59. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kesterton AJ, Cleland J, Sloggett A, Ronsmans C. Institutional delivery in rural India: The relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2010;10:30. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Majhi MM, Bhatnagar N. Updated B.G Prasad’s classification for the year 2021: Consideration for new base year 2016. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:4318-19. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. World Health Organization; 2016. Accessed April 19, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf.
15.
International Institute for Population Sciences, ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. International Institute for Population Sciences; 2017. Accessed April 19, 2022. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/national-family-health-survey-nfhs-4-2015-16-india/.
16.
Operational Guidelines on Maternal and Newborn Health. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2010. Accessed April 19, 2022. http:// tripuranrhm.gov.in/Guidlines/Maternal_Newborn_Health.pdf.
17.
Kumar H, Chacko IV, Mane S, Govindan NN, Prasanth S. Study of utilization of antenatal care services and its determinants among pregnant women admitted in a tertiary care hospital in Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2020;7:1960-67. [crossref]
18.
Roy MP, Mohan U, Singh SK, Singh VK, Srivastava AK. Determinants of utilization of antenatal care services in rural Lucknow, India. J Fam Med Primary Care. 2013;2:55-59. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sruthi MV, Bablu R. A cross-sectional study on utilization and content of antenatal services among pregnant women in a coastal area of Thrissur district. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(6):2094-100. [crossref]
20.
Chethana K, Anil M, Nelliyanil M. Antenatal service utilization among women in South India: A community based cross sectional study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9:1110-14. [crossref]
21.
Madhu K, Chowdary S, Masthi R. Breast feeding practices and newborn care in rural areas: A descriptive cross sectional study. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34:243 46. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Tellis SB, Rent PD, Dmello MK. Utilization of antenatal care and out of pocket expenditure on delivery care in Dakshina Kannada. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5:3553-58. [crossref]
23.
Swetha NB, Shobha S, Sriram S. Utilization of maternal health care services in an urban slum of bangalore-A cross-sectional study. Natl J Community Med, 2021;12(7):194-98. Doi: 10.5455/njcm.20210610100415. [crossref]
24.
Poornima C, Ranganath TS. A study on utilization of maternal services in urban slums of Bangalore. Indian J of Basic & Applied Medical Sciences. 2011;1(1):70-75.
25.
Mumbare SS, Rege R. Ante natal care services utilization, delivery practices and factors affecting them in tribal area of North Maharashtra. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36:287-90. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Kakati R, Barua K, Borah M. Factors associated with the utilization of antenatal care services in rural areas of Assam, India. Int J Community Med Public Health 2016;3:2799-805. [crossref]
27.
Mohanty S, Ghadei R, Mishra SS, Nayak D, Parida S. Quality of antenatal care in a tertiary care hospital of odisha: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Diag Res. 2021;15(11):08-11.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58290.16755

Date of Submission: Jun 10, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 20, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 23, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 15, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 22, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jul 05, 2022 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com