Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 238122

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : PC05 - PC07 Full Version

Urethral Sounding: Experience from Two Tertiary Care Centres in Northern India


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57881.16709
Mohd Mubashir Ali Khan, Gyanendra Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Apul Goel

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Professor, Department of Urology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Gyanendra Singh,
554/1374, Pawanpuri, Alambagh, Lucknow-226005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sgyanendra24@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Foreign bodies have been removed from urethra and bladder of young females since time immemorial. Various explanations have been offered by the patients but the variety, multiplicity and large sizes indicate masturbation as the major cause.

Aim: To study the characteristics and find out the actual motive of urethral sounding at two tertiary care centres in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted between January 2021 to December 2021 analysing the records of all patients who presented to urology emergency of King George’s Medical University, Lucknow and Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah between June 2006 and June 2020 with foreign bodies in the urethra or urinary bladder. Data regarding the age, marital status of patient, type of foreign body and its location in the lower urinary tract, presence of any psychiatric illness, method of removal of the foreign body and possible cause of insertion of the foreign body from the records were collected. Data was segregated, coded and recorded in the Microsoft® Excel spreadsheet. Descriptive data were presented as percentages and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 by IBM USA.

Results: A total of 21 patients presented to the urology emergency with foreign body in the lower urinary tract between June 2006 and June 2020. None of the patients had any known psychiatric illness and all of them were adult males with age ranging from 18 to 45 years. Eight patients were managed by removal of foreign body with the help of artery forceps while 12 patients underwent cystoscopic removal of foreign body. One patient who had knotted electric wire in urinary bladder required laser fragmentation. Thirteen of the patients confessed to urethral masturbation while the rest offered vague explanations like accidental insertion or simply inquisitiveness.

Conclusion: The results of this retrospective study indicate that urethral masturbation using foreign body exists in the healthy adult males. It generally does not come into notice until the patient ends up with impaction of the foreign body. More studies need to be done to see whether this could be a possible cause of urethral stricture in patients with inadequate history.

Keywords

Foreign body, Orgasm, Paraphilia, Sexual gratification, Urethral masturbation

Foreign bodies have been removed from urethra and bladder of young females since time immemorial. Various explanations have been offered by the patients but the variety, multiplicity and large size indicate masturbation as the major cause. Presentation may be late in some patients due to fear of embarrassment (1). Patient usually presents with difficulty in urination, haematuria, dysuria or may lend up in complete urinary retention (2). These foreign bodies are easily diagnosed by ultrasonography or x-ray imaging. Polyembolokoilamania is the term described for the act of inserting various foreign bodies into the bodily orifices (3),(4). There have been several case reports of urethral sounding in the literature (5). Most of these studies report sexual or erotic pleasure as the reason for insertion of foreign body (1),(6),(7),(8). Limited evidence exists in literature for the analysis of the nature and cause of urethral sounding in patients over a long period of time (9). In present study, authors have shared their experience about incidence and real motive of urethral sounding at two tertiary centres over a period of 14 years.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted between January 2021 to December 2021 analysing the records of all patients who had presented to urology emergency with foreign bodies in the urethra or urinary bladder between June 2006 and June 2020 at King George’s Medical University, Lucknow and Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India. Permission to assess, analyse and publish the data of these patients was taken from the Head of Department of Urology of the two centres.

Data regarding the age, marital status of patient, type of foreign body and its location in the lower urinary tract, presence of any psychiatric illness, method of removal of the foreign body and possible cause of insertion of the foreign body from the medical records were collected. Informed consent was taken from all the patients.

Statistical Analysis

Data was segregated, coded and recorded in the Microsoft® Excel spreadsheet program. Descriptive percentages and frequencies were represented by constructing tables. Mean and standard deviation were summarised for continuous variables, whereas frequencies and proportions for categorical variables. All statistical analysis was performed with statistical software using SPSS version 24.0 by IBM USA.

Results

A total of 21 patients presented in the urology emergency of King George’s Medical University, Lucknow and Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah with foreign body in the lower urinary tract during June 2006 to June 2020. Patient characteristics, type and location of foreign body, cause of insertion and management strategies are enlisted in (Table/Fig 1). None of the patients had any known psychiatric illness and all of them were adult males with age ranging from 18 to 45 years. Mean age was 29.3±2.1 years, 12 (57.14%) of them were married, 10 (47.62%) patients had foreign body impacted in the anterior urethra, 5 (23.81%) patients had the foreign body in the posterior urethra while the foreign body in the urinary bladder was found in 6 (28.57%) patients. Seven patients had inserted insulated plastic wire (Table/Fig 2), four patients had inserted a long needle, four patients had inserted nails (Table/Fig 3), three patients had inserted thin wooden stick, two patients had inserted house broom straw and one patient had inserted hair pin (Table/Fig 4).

About 13 (61.91%) patients confessed to urethral masturbation while the rest offered vague explanations like accidental insertion or simply inquisitiveness. Spinal anaesthesia was given in 6 (28.57%) cases while 15 (71.43%) were managed by local anaesthesia (Table/Fig 1). Foreign bodies palpated in the penile urethra (n=8) were gently milked distally under local anaesthesia and pulled out with an artery forceps. Foreign bodies which were presented in the bulbar urethra, posterior urethra or bladder (n=12) were removed with the help of cystoscope. One case of knotted electric wire located in the urinary bladder was removed by the laser fragmentation.

None of the patients had haematuria. After removal of the foreign body, catheter was inserted for two-three days in 15 patients while six were left as such. The decision to catheterise was taken if there was urethral inflammation or if the foreign body was present for more than a day.

All patients were referred to psychiatry department for psychological evaluation. All patients were given broad spectrum oral antibiotics (cefixime) and oral analgesics (aceclofenac) for a period of three-five days. All patients were counselled and followed-up on Outpatient Department (OPD) basis. None of the patients reported any significant problems like stricture or haematuria in the follow-up visits.

Discussion

The case reports of insertion of foreign bodies in the urethra have ever been increasing (5),(8),(9),(10). The various reasons for insertion of these bodies are erotic impulses, mental illness and sexual curiosity (11). The facts that were borne out of the present study were that the patients practising urethral sounding were healthy males without any reported psychological disorder. Thirteen of them confessed on confidential questioning to achieving an orgasm like state after the insertion of foreign body in the urethra.

Many authors consider urethral masturbation both as a psychiatric as well as urologic disease (12),(13),(14). There are few theories that explain the reason for self-insertion of foreign bodies into the urethra. As per Kenney RD theory, there often tends to be an accidentally discovered pleasurable stimulation of the urethra. He further proposed that a particular psychological predisposition to sexual gratification drives the patient to repeat this behaviour using objects which he think are potentially harmless (13). Wise TN considered self-insertion of foreign bodies into the urethra as a type of paraphilia and has a combination of sadomasochistic and fetishist elements (14). An internet-based survey done on 2000 men who had sex with men reported a 10% incidence of recreational urethral sounding. The study also concluded that urethral masturbation was associated with a higher risk of sexually transmitted infections and indulgence in high-risk sexual behaviours including sex with strangers and multiple sexual partners (6). However such behaviour was not found among the patients in this study.

None of the patients included in this study had haematuria indicating a careful rehearsed insertion of the foreign body. The male urethra has the verumontanum with the opening of seminal vesicles close by and muscle sphincter distal to it (15). Authors propose that the stimulation of urethra or the verumontanum is the objective but the simultaneous contraction of distal sphincter sucks in the foreign body causing impaction at the bladder neck. The length of the foreign body is also an indication that the purpose was stimulation of the posterior urethra.

There are several techniques that can be utilised for the removal of these self-inserted foreign bodies. These include cystoscopy, suprapubic cystotomy, meatotomy, fogarty catheterisation, internal or external urethrotomy and injection of solvents (10). In the present study, all the foreign bodies were successfully removed either by endoscopic retrieval or adequate lubrication with milking. The process was atraumatic because no haematuria or subsequent stricture formation was reported. No suprapubic cystostomy or urethrotomy was required. All the patients were given adequate psychiatric counselling at the time of discharge as the risk of recurrence is high in these cases (16),(17).

Urethral sounding often leads to impacted or retained foreign bodies either in the urethra or urinary bladder. These could predispose the patient to urinary complications like infections, haematuria, acute urinary retention and dysuria. Such conditions need urgent intervention and removal of the foreign bodies (9).

Limitation(s)

The present study had few limitations. First, the actual prevalence of urethral masturbation could not be determined as only those patients who end up in some complication from this practice only visit the hospital. Second, long-term follow-up was not done so long-term complications like urethral stricture could not be evaluated. Third, the recurrence rate of urethral masturbation after proper psychiatric counselling in these patients was not evaluated.

Conclusion

The results of this retrospective study indicate that urethral masturbation using foreign body exists in the healthy adult males. It generally does not come into notice until the patient ends up with impaction of the foreign body. More studies are required to see whether this could be a possible cause of urethral stricture in patients with inadequate history.

References

1.
Van Ophoven A, deKernion JB. Clinical management of foreign bodies of the genitourinary tract. J Urol. 2000;164(2):274-87. [crossref]
2.
Thomsen TW, Setnik GS. Videos in clinical medicine. Male urethral catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(21):e22. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Lesser JM, Hughes SV, Jemelka JR, Griffith J. Sexually inappropriate behaviors. Assessment necessitates careful medical and psychological evaluation and sensitivity. Geriatrics. 2005;60(1):34:36-37.
4.
Rosenthal M, Berkman P, Shapira A, Gil I, Abramovitz J. Urethral masturbation and sexual disinhibition in dementia: A case report. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2003;40(1):67-72.
5.
Aggarwal P, Sandhu, AS. Urethral masturbation, urethral foreign body-Review of cases. Indian J Surg. 2021;83:1574-77. [crossref]
6.
Breyer BN, Shindel AW. Recreational urethral sounding is associated with high risk sexual behaviour and sexually transmitted infections. BJU International. 2012;110(5):720-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Rinard K, Nelius T, Hogan L, Young C, Roberts AE, Armstrong ML. Cross-sectional study examining four types of male penile and urethral “play”. Urology. 2010;76:1326-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Grubišić I, Stimac G, Pezelj I, Svaguša I, Katušič J, Spajić B. Intravesical foreign body as a result of self catheterization: Case report. Acta Clin Croat. 2014;53(3):359-61.
9.
Bansal A, Yadav P, Kumar M, Sankhwar S, Purkait B, Jhanwar A, et al. Foreign bodies in the urinary bladder and their management: A single-centre experience from North India. Int Neurourol J. 2016;20(3):260-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Bedi N, El-Husseiny T, Buchholz N, Masood J. ‘Putting lead in your pencil’: Self-insertion of an unusual urethral foreign body for sexual gratification. JRSM Short Rep. 2010;1(2):18. Doi: 10.1258/shorts.2010.010014. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Craciun M, Omorphos S, Lunawat R, Kanaga-Sundaram S.Searching for the G spot in the urinary bladder: Autoerotism and potential complications. J Sur Case Rep. 2014;2014(3):rju020. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Costa G, Di Tonno F, Capodieci S, Laurini L, Casagrande R, Lavelli D, et al. Self-introduction of foreign bodies into the urethra: A multidisciplinary problem. Int Urol Nephrol. 1993;25(1):77-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Kenney RD. Adolescent males who insert genitourinary foreign bodies: Is psychiatric referral required? Urology. 1988;32(2):127-29. [crossref]
14.
Wise TN. Urethral manipulation: An unusual paraphilia. J Sex Marital Ther. 1982;8(3):222-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Chavez J. Anatomy & histology-male urethra. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/prostateurethramalenormal.html. Accessed May 5th, 2022.
16.
Ali Khan S, Kaiser CW, Dailey B, Krane R. Unusual foreign body in the urethra. Urol Int. 1984;39(3):184-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Lackey JT, Acosta S. Unusual objects found in lower urinary tract. Urology. 1973;2(1):75-76. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57881.16709

Date of Submission: May 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 08, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 20, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 26, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 08, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jul 29, 2022 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com