Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 46643

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : TC06 - TC10 Full Version

Non Invasive Assessment of Fibrosis in Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Shear Wave Elastography and NAFLD Fibrosis Score: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/50642.16748
BN Vinyasa, Vikram Patil

1. Ex-postgraduate Student, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JSS Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JSS Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. BN Vinyasa,
Ex-postgraduate Student, Department of Radiodiagnosis, JSS Hospital, Agrahara, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: vinyasa.nagesh@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The major consequence of Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is the inflammation and fibrosis of hepatic tissue resulting in cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and eventually hepatocellular carcinoma. Presently, the distinction between simple steatosis, steatohepatitis, and cirrhosis stages of NAFLD is largely dependent on liver biopsy. Since, liver biopsy is invasive, it is not suitable for screening purposes. To overcome this limitation, elastography and NAFLD fibrosis score have been studied as non invasive objective substitutes for liver biopsy.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) as a method to diagnose significant-advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD by using NAFLD fibrosis score as a reference standard.

Materials and Methods: This hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted at JSS Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India over a period of 18 months from September 2018 to November 2019.Total 154 participants underwent ultrasound abdomen to assess the presence and grade the degree of steatosis. All patients underwent 2D shear wave elastography and the values were compared with NAFLD fibrosis scores. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 23.0.

Results: The age of this study group ranged from 20-76 years, mean age was 42.8±10.8 years including 51 (33.1%) females and 103 (66.9%) males. The level of agreement for assessment of fibrosis between SWE and NAFLD fibrosis score was good (score of 0.71). Using a predictive shear stiffness threshold of 6.1 kPa, shear stiffness distinguished low (fibrosis stage 0-2) from high (fibrosis stage 3-4) fibrosis stages with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 92.5% (area under the curve of 0.879).

Conclusion: Two-dimensional shear wave elastography showed a good diagnostic performance for detection of fibrosis.

Keywords

Cirrhosis, Liver biopsy, Steatosis, Ultrasound

Due to recent changes in lifestyle and diet, there has been a global rise in incidence of Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) creating a public health crisis, particularly in south Asia with a prevalence of approximately 9-32% within the general population of India (1).

Non alcoholic fatty liver disease is a spectrum of liver disease characterised by intracellular deposition of lipids within the hepatocytes, inflammation leading to hepatocytes injury which is accompanied by varying degree of fibrosis in the absence of secondary causes such as alcohol, drugs, toxins, hepatitis etc. Histologically the disease spectrum ranges from the benign hepatic steatosis to Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) with progressive fibrosis ultimately leading to cirrhosis (2). Patients with NAFLD have a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases and liver-disease related morality such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma as compared to control population (3),(4). Various studies have shown that early intervention in NAFLD patients such as diet control, exercise and weight loss leads to an improvement in the histological grade of NAFLD (5). Hence, early identification of fibrosis in NAFLD is vital.

Among the various techniques available to assess liver fibrosis, liver biopsy remains the gold standard. However, its utility as a screening test is impractical and unwarranted due to invasive nature. Moreover, it is prone to sampling errors, interobserver and intraobserver variability in the interpretation of histopathological slides thereby limiting its accuracy (6). To overcome this limitation numerous non invasive biochemical and radiological tools have been developed to assess the degree of fibrosis of liver in NAFLD patients.

The serum non invasive methods are Alanine aminotransferase/Aspartate aminotransferase ratio, Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 index for hepatic fibrosis, NAFLD fibrosis score and BARD {Body mass index ≥ 28=1 point, Aspartate transaminase/Alanine transaminase Ratio (AAR) ≥ 0.8=2 points, type 2 Diabetes mellitus=1point} score. Of these the NAFLD fibrosis score is the most validated for assessment of fibrosis in NAFLD. It utilises six variables which include age, body mass index, hyperglycaemia, platelet count, albumin and AST/ALT ratio (7). Advanced fibrosis can be ruled out with high accuracy by using a low cut-off point (-1.455) with a negative predictive value of 93%, thereby avoiding biopsies in these patients (8).

In radiology, elastography is used as a non invasive tool for assessment of liver fibrosis. Various elastography techniques include the transient elastography, shear wave elastography, supersonic shear wave elastography, Real time elastography and MRI Elastography. The most widely accepted and easily available techniques are transient elastography and 2D shear wave elastography (9).

In this study, we have assessed the shear wave elastography scores and NAFLD fibrosis score in normal and varying grade of fatty infiltration of liver as assessed by 2D ultrasound. The Shear wave elastography score and NAFLD fibrosis score were compared to assess the degree of agreement between the two. Further, diagnostic accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) as a method to diagnose significant-advanced fibrosis in NAFLD was assessed by using NAFLD fibrosis score as a reference standard.

Material and Methods

This hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted at JSS Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India over a period of 18 months from September 2018 to November 2019. Total 154 participants underwent ultrasound abdomen to assess the presence and grade of Steatosis. Informed consent from the enrolled participants and approval from Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC No-JSS/MC/PG/4623/2018-19) were obtained.

Sample size calculation: Based on previous hospital records (last five years), the prevalence of NAFLD among patients visiting the hospital was found to be 11%. Sample size was calculated by the formula; N=z2pq/d2 (N-Sample size, z-Standard deviation (1.96 for 95% confidence), p- prevalence, q-(1-p), d-margin of error of 5. A total of 154 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria referred were enrolled in the study.

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria for enrollment was 2D ultrasound evidence of presence of steatosis with the absence of excessive alcohol consumption which was defined as alcohol consumption more than 20 g/day for women and 30 g/day for men.

Exclusion criteria: Alcoholics, pregnant women, Wilson’s disease, iron overload and patients with known common secondary causes of fatty liver like drugs, chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C were excluded from the study.

Philips iu22 Ultrasound (USG) machine using curved array transducer of 3-5 MHz frequency was used for grey scale imaging of liver.

Fatty infiltration of liver grading (10):

Grade 0: Normal echogenicity of Liver. Isoechoic to renal cortex.

Grade I: Minimal diffuse increase in the fine echoes. Liver appears bright compared to the cortex of the kidney. Normal visualisation of diaphragm and intrahepatic vessel borders.

Grade II : Moderate diffuse increase in the fine echoes. There is slight impaired visualisation of the intrahepatic vessels and diaphragm.

Grade III : Marked increase in the fine echoes. There is poor or no visualisation of intrahepatic vessels and diaphragm with poor penetration of the posterior segment of the right lobe of the liver.

Point shear wave elastography quantification: Shear wave elastography of the right lobe of liver was done following grey scale Ultrasound (USG) using curved array transducer of 3-5 MHz frequency on the Phillips iU22 US scanner. The participants were studied in supine with the right arm in maximum abduction. The right lobe of liver was subjected to shear wave elastography using the intercostal approach. Region of interest was elected free of vessels and ducts, within 2 cm from liver capsule. The participants were asked to stop breathing for a second in order to curtail breathing motion. All dimensions were performed by the same radiologist and described in kilopascals (kPa).

Study Procedure

Total of ten valid readings were taken. More than 60% of the measurements had to be good measurements; if not, a value was not reported. A “good” measurement was one where a numerical result is obtained, not an “x.xx” or “0.00”. Median value was selected out of the total readings obtained. The shear wave speed was presented in kilopascals using Young’s modulus (11).

The liver stiffness was categorised into different stages of fibrosis such as significant fibrosis (F>2), advanced fibrosis (F>3), and cirrhosis (F=4), respectively, using cut-off values of 6.43 kPa, 9.54 kPa, and 11.34 kPa, respectively, as given by Ferraioli G et al., (12).

Serum Liver fibrosis indices:NAFLD fibrosis score=1.675×0.037 age (years)×0.094 BMI (kg/m2
1.13×IFG/diabetes (yes 1, no 0)×0.99 AST/ALT ratio 0.013 platelet (109/L) 0.66 albumin (g/dL) (8). The age, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), platelet count, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus and liver function tests were obtained to calculate NAFLD score. The NAFLD fibrosis score was calculated as follows:

Based on NAFLD fibrosis score the participants were grouped into three groups a described below (8).

< -1.455: predictor of absence of significant fibrosis (F0-F2 fibrosis)
≥ -1.455 to ≤ 0.675: indeterminate score
> 0.675: predictor of presence of significant fibrosis (F3-F4 fibrosis)

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were summarised as the mean±standard deviation. The Student’s t-test, Chi-square test and Fisher’s-exact test were used as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at a two-sided p-value <0.05. The mean values of patients with sonographic findings of NAFLD were calculated. The level of agreement between SWE and serum fibrosis indices (NAFLD fibrosis score) was measured using the Kendall tau correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performance of SWE for staging liver fibrosis compared with NAFLD fibrosis score (reference standards), was assessed using Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC) analysis.

Results

The age of this study group ranged from 20-76 years, mean age was 42.8±10.8 years (Table/Fig 1). This study population consisted of 51 females (33.1%) and 103 males (66.9%).

Based on 2D ultrasound grading of fatty infiltration of liver, among the study population, 50 (32.5%) did not have fatty infiltration of liver, 51 (33.1%) of them had grade I fatty infiltration of liver. While 23 (14.9%) of the study group had grade II fatty infiltration and 30 (19.5%) of the study group had grade III fatty infiltration (Table/Fig 2).

Comparison of SWE measurements with sonographic findings: On shear wave elastography quantification of liver stiffness, the mean liver stiffness in participants without 2D ultrasound evidence of fatty infiltration was found to be 4.6±1.1 kPa.

In this study, there is progressive rise in liver stiffness with increase in severity of fatty infiltration. The mean liver stiffness for grade I fatty infiltration was 6.7±0.94 kPa, grade II fatty infiltration was 9.3±1.28 kPa and grade III fatty infiltration was 10.7±2.06 kPa (Table/Fig 3).

A 47-year-old female with Grade III fatty infiltration of liver on B-mode USG was moderately increased echo pattern of liver with slight impairment of visualisation of intrahepatic vessels and blurring of diaphragmatic margin [Table/Fig-4a]. On SWE, value of 9.6 kPa was obtained [Table/Fig-4b]. Her NAFLD fibrosis score was 0.046.

A 20-year-old male with normal echo pattern of liver B-mode USG was without sonological evidence of fatty infiltration [Table/Fig-5a]. On SWE value of 3.04 kPa was obtained [Table/Fig-5b]. His NAFLD fibrosis score was -0.758.

Distribution of fibrosis among the NAFLD groups based on Shear wave elastography estimation: Among the 104 subjects with fatty infiltration of liver, 10 (9.6%) had no significant fibrosis, 64 (61.5%) had significant fibrosis, 19 (18.2%) had advanced fibrosis and 11 (10.5%) had cirrhosis. Among the 50 participants with sonological normal liver had 46 (92%) had no significant fibrosis on elastography and 4 (8%) had significant fibrosis.

Distribution of fibrosis among the NAFLD groups based on NAFLD fibrosis score: Based on NAFLD fibrosis score, out of the 154 participants, 16% had low risk of fibrosis i.e., advanced fibrosis could be excluded with high accuracy, 27.9% had an intermediate score and 56.5% of them had significant fibrosis (F3 and F4) (Table/Fig 6).

Performance of SWE in the estimation of fibrosis: The level of agreement for staging of fibrosis between SWE and NAFLD fibrosis score was assessed using the Kendall’s tau correlation test. Good agreement was obtained between the SWE and serum NAFLD fibrosis score with a score of 0.71 achieving a highly statistical significance (p-value <0.001).

The diagnostic ability of SWE to differentiate the stage of fibrosis was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. Patients were divided into a lack of significant fibrosis (F0-F1) and presence of significant-advanced fibrosis (F2-F4) taking NAFLD fibrosis score values as the reference standard with NAFLD fibrosis score of > - 1.455 used as cut-off for the presence of significant-advanced fibrosis. The ROC curves were plotted using SWE measurements for prediction of presence of significant-advanced fibrosis (F2-F4) over a lack of significant fibrosis (F0-F1). The Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC) was 0.879 for the prediction of significant-advanced fibrosis (F2-F4) over a lack of significant fibrosis (F0-F1) using SWE measurements. The best discriminating cut-off value of liver stiffness to diagnose significant-advanced fibrosis was 6.1 kPa (Table/Fig 7). This cut-off was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of shear wave elastography in detecting advanced fibrosis of 83% and 92.5%, respectively. The positive predictive rate was 90.5% and negative predictive rate of 70.4%.

Discussion

In this study, based on 2D USG grading of fatty infiltration of liver, out of 154 participants included in the study, 50 (32.5%) did not have fatty infiltration of liver, 51 (33.1%) of them had grade 1 fatty infiltration of liver, 23 (14.9%) of them had grade II fatty infiltration and 30 (19.5%) of them had grade III fatty infiltration.

On shear wave elastography, a mean liver stiffness of 4.6±1.1 kPa was obtained in subjects without 2D ultrasound evidence of fatty infiltration. Similar such normal liver stiffness values were published in a study by Huang Z et al., (13). In their study, mean value of the SWE measurements in 502 individuals without fatty infiltration of liver was 5.10±1.02 kPa. Suh CH et al., provided a range of normal elastography value of 2.6-6.2 kPa and in a study by Arda K et al., mean elasticity value for the right lobe of liver was determined as 4 kPa ±2.2 kPain 127 healthy volunteers (14),(15).

In this study, there was progressive rise in liver stiffness with increase in severity of fatty infiltration. This finding was consistent with study done by Li YY et al., which showed a positive correlation between rise in liver stiffness with increasing grade of fatty liver with correlation coefficient of 0.822 (16). However, this result is in conflict with study conducted by Yoneda M et al., where there was lower stiffness in mild steatosis as compared to normal liver (17). The effect of steatosis and inflammation on measurement of liver stiffness to assess fibrosis has been evaluated by various studies with varied results. Most studies have concluded that steatosis and inflammation affects transient elastography (18),(19),(20) based assessment of fibrosis but not fibrosis assessment by shear wave elastography (21). Liu H, et al., in a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) elastography in detecting hepatic fibrosis in NAFLD patients found that majority of the Shear Wave Speed (SWV) increases with the degree of fibrosis observed by histopathology (22).

In the present study, the overall prevalence of significant, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis as aby shear wave elastography was 56.6%, 32% and 20%, respectively. In a meta-analysis of 64 original articles (13,046 NAFLD patients) by Xiao G et al., the prevalence of significant, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in NAFLD patients were 45.0%, 24.0% and 9.4%, respectively (23).

On comparing the fibrosis staging by shear wave elastography and NAFLD fibrosis score, good agreement was obtained with a value of 0.71 (Kendall’s Tau correlation coefficient). In a recent study by Alsowey AM and Shehata SM an excellent agreement was found between shear wave elastography and fibrotest in staging of liver fibrosis in 88% of their study population (24).

There are few studies that have compared the elastography with fibrosis score for assessment of liver fibrosis due to other aetiologies such as the Hepatitis B and C. Lee JE et al., and Lu Q et al., compared the utility of point shear wave elastography with serum fibrosis indices (APRI and FIB-4) and HPE findings [25,26]. Lee JE et al., reported a similar diagnostic accuracy of point SWE, ARFI and Transient Elastography (TE) with histopathological examination findings (25). Lu Q et al., concluded that liver stiffness as measured by point SWE has a stronger correlation compared with histopathological fibrosis stages than APRI and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) (26).

Using NAFLD fibrosis score as a reference standard, a cut-off of 6.1 Kpas was obtained to differentiate no fibrosis from significant-advanced fibrosis with a good sensitivity and specificity. Based on the statistical analysis in this study, we found that point SWE had a high diagnostic accuracy with AUCs of 0.879 (cut-off value- 6.1 Kpas). Studies by Dhyani M et al., Garcovich M et al., and Jamialahmadi T et al., reported a cut-off value of 6.83-10.8 KPas, 6.7 Kpas and 6.6 kpas for the diagnosis of significant-advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients (27),(28),(29). Furlan A et al., and Palmeri ML et al., reported slightly lower cut-off values of 5.7 kpas and 4.2 kpas for the diagnosis of significant-advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients, respectively (30),(31).

The clinical utility of fibrosis assessment in patients with NAFLD is less clearly defined than other types of liver disease. In this study, we focused on identifying the presence of significant-advanced liver fibrosis among the NAFLD patients as fibrosis has been well-established as a prognostic determinant among NAFLD patients. There is growing evidence that fibrosis has a great influence on the hepatic and extra-hepatic mortality as compared to simple steatosis or even NASH without fibrosis (2). Hence, it is vital that fibrosis be diagnosed at the earliest for NAFLD patients. It also recognises candidates for surveillance, such as endoscopic screening for gastroesophageal varices and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, the presence of fibrosis may encourage the physician and the patient to make efforts at sustainable weight reduction (32).

The second rational is that definitive diagnosis of fibrosis requires biopsy which is non invasive procedure and is associated with complications. This warrants a risk stratification of patients with NAFLD utilising the non invasive tests. Selective number of patients can be referred for a liver biopsy based on SWE and NAFLD fibrosis score values. NAFLD patients without evidence of fibrosis can be followed on USG instead of subjecting them to unnecessary biopsies. Further studies comparing the performance of other serum biomarkers {Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel, Fibrometer, FibroTest, and Hepascore} and imaging modalities such as MR elastography in staging of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients is recommended.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of this study was that the 2D SWE values were not compared with histologic liver fibrosis stage.

Conclusion

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography showed a good diagnostic performance for detection of liver fibrosis and had a good agreement with NAFLD fibrosis score in detecting the degree of liver fibrosis and hence can be used reliably for non invasive evaluation of fibrosis in NAFLD patients.

References

1.
Duseja A. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in India- A lot done, yet more required! Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29(6):217-25. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Bertot LC, Adams LA. The natural course of non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5):774. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Rafiq N, Bai C, Fang Y, Srishord M, McCullough A, Gramlich T, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:234-38. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guideline by the American Association for the study of liver diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology. 2012;55(6):2005-23. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Musso G, Cassader M, Rosina F, Gambino R. Impact of current treatments on liver disease, glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risk in non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Diabetologia. 2012;55:885-904. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Trifan A, Stanciu C. Checkmate to liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(39):5514-20. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Machado MV, Cortez-Pinto H. Non invasive diagnosis of non alcoholic fatty liver disease. A critical appraisal. J Hepatol. 2013;58(5):1007-19. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: A noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45(4):846-54. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Jeong WK, Lim HK, Lee HK, Jo JM, Kim Y. Principles and clinical application of ultrasound elastography for diffuse liver disease. Ultrasonography. 2014;33(3):149. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Wilson SR, Withers CE. CHAPTER 4: The Liver. Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 4th Ed: Elsevier/Mosby. 2011:96.
11.
Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography, update 2017 (long version). Ultraschall Med. 2017;38:e16-e47. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Ferraioli G, Maiocchi L, Lissandrin R, Tinelli C, De Silvestri A, Filice C. Accuracy of the ElastPQ® technique for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A “real life” single center study. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2016;25(3):331-35. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Huang Z, Zheng J, Zeng J, Wang X, Wu T, Zheng R. Normal liver stiffness in healthy adults assessed by real-time shear wave elastography and factors that influence this method. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:2549-55. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Suh CH, Kim SY, Kim KW, Lim YS, Lee SJ, Lee MG, et al. Determination of normal hepatic elasticity by using real-time shear-wave elastography. Radiology. 2014;271:895-900. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Arda K, Ciledag N, Aribas BK, Aktas E, Köse K. Quantitative assessment of the elasticity values of liver with shear wave ultraso-nographic elastography. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137:911-15.
16.
Li YY, Wang XM, Zhang YX, Ou GC. Ultrasonic elastography in clinical quantitative assessment of fatty liver. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(37):4733. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Yoneda M, Fujita K, Inamori M, Nakajima A, Yoneda M, Tamano M, et al. Transien telastography in patients with non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Gut. 2007;56(9):1330-31. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Fraquelli M, Rigamonti C, Casazza G, Donato MF, Ronchi G, Conte D, et al. Etiology-related determinants of liver stiffness values in chronic viral hepatitis B or C. J Hepatol. 2011;54(4):621-28. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sánchez-Conde M, Montes Ramírez ML, Bellón Cano JM, Caminoa A, Alvarez Rodríguez F, González Garcia J, et al. Impact of liver steatosis on the correlation between liver stiffness and fibrosis measured by transient elastography in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18(7):e278-83. [crossref]
20.
Kim SU, Kim Y, Ahn SH, Kim HM, Lee JM, Chon CY, et al. The impact of steatosis on liver stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57(101):832-38.
21.
Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R, Cretoiu D, Baicus C, Marinoschi G. Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(44):5525-32. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Liu H, Fu J, Hong R, Liu L, Li F. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the non invasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in non alcoholic fatty liver disease patients: A systematic review & meta-analysis. PloS One. 2015;10(7):e0127782. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Xiao G, Zhu S, Xiao X, Yan L, Yang J, Wu G. Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance elastography to detect fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017;66(5):1486-501. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Alsowey AM, Shehata SM. Non invasive staging of liver fibrosis by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in patients with chronic hepatitis C and B. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52(122). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00502-4. [crossref]
25.
Lee JE, Shin KS, Cho JS, You SK, Min JH, Kim KH, et al. Non invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with ElastPQ: comparison with transient elastography and serologic fibrosis marker tests, and correlation with liver pathology results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(11):2515-21. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Lu Q, Lu C, Li J, Ling W, Qi X, He D, et al. Stiffness value and serum biomarkers in liver fibrosis staging: Study in large surgical specimens in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Radiology. 2016;280(1):290-99.[crossref][PubMed]
27.
Dhyani M, Gee MS, Misdraji J, Israel EJ, Shah U, Samir AE. Feasibility study for assessing liver fibrosis in paediatric and adolescent patients using real-time shear wave elastography. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015;59(6):687-94. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Garcovich M, Veraldi S, Di Stasio E, Zocco MA, Monti L, Tomà P, et al. Liver stiffness in pediatric patients with fatty liver disease: Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of shear-wave elastography. Radiology. 2017;283(3):820-27. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Jamialahmadi T, Nematy M, Jangjoo A, Goshayeshi L, Rezvani R, Ghaffarzadegan K, et al. Measurement of liver stiffness with 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in bariatric surgery candidates reveals acceptable diagnostic yield compared to liver biopsy. Obesity Surgery. 2019;29(8):2585-92. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Furlan A, Tublin ME, Yu L, Chopra KB, Lippello A, Behari J. Comparison of 2D shear wave elastography, transient elastography, and MR elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(1):W20-W26. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Rouze NC, Abdelmalek MF, Guy CD, Moser B, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using acoustic radiation force-based shear stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55(3):666-72. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Charlton M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A review of current understanding and future impact. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(12):1048-58.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/50642.16748

Date of Submission: Jun 01, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 08, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 30, 2021
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 02, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 29, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 08, 2022 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com