Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 9583

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : WC01 - WC06 Full Version

Clinical, Dermoscopic and Histopathologic Features of Cicatricial Alopecia- A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55269.16695
Priyadharsini Jeyaprakash, Priyavathani Annie Malathy, Samuel Jeyaraj Daniel

1. Consultant Dermatologist, Department of Dermatology, Hindu Mission Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (Dvl), Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (Dvl), Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Samuel Jeyaraj Daniel,
No. 24/46, Aspiran Garden, Kilpauk, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drsjdaniel@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cicatricial Alopecia (CA) is a scarring form that arises due to permanent hair follicle destruction. It can either primarily affect the follicles or by an external process leads to secondary alopecia causing scarring and considerable disfigurement of the scalp. Hence initial diagnosis, aetiology of the contributing factors and earlier intervention are vital.

Aim: To identify the diagnostic features of CA based on clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological (HP) findings and the underlying aetiological causes.

Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care centre of Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from November 2016 to September 2017. Total 50 clinically diagnosed CA cases were randomly selected and case history, related skin findings, predisposing factors and other findings associated with scarring were documented. Dermatological examination and Hair pull test was done. Trichoscopic examination was done using a non polarised dermoscopy with specific emphasis on the follicular ostia and morphological patterns. Scalp biopsy was done. The collected data were analysed in terms of frequency and percentage and Chi-square test was also performed with p-value <0.05 as statistically significant.

Results: Out of total 50 patients, 22 (44%) were males, and 28 (56%) females with the mean age of 35.46±15.03 years. Total 29 (58%) patients had multiple lesions and 21 (42%) had localised involvement of alopecia in the scalp. Focal type was noted in 86%, and diffuse type in 14%. In this study, 80% of CA were of primary causes with only 20% secondary causes. Lichen Plano Pilaris (LPP) and trauma were the most common primary and secondary causes. The dermoscopic features of absent follicular orifice, arborising thicker blood vessel and pustule formation were statistically significant (p-value <0.001) for the diagnosis of CA. The most common histopathological feature was basal cell vacuolization (54%), followed by hyperkeratosis (52%), and follicular plugging (46%).

Conclusion: The clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological findings of this study were consistent for diagnosis and differentiating primary CA. Histopathology is the final confirmatory diagnostic tool when characteristic clinical and dermoscopic features are absent.

Keywords

Permanent hair follicle destruction, Primary scarring alopecia, Skin of colour, Trichoscope

Cicatricial Alopecia (CA) is a scarring form that arises due to permanent hair follicle destruction leading to localised loss of hair (1). Due to the destruction of stem cell niche of the bulge region of follicle, hair regrowth is impaired. It can either primarily affect the follicles or by an external process leads to secondary CA (2). The common etiology of primary CA includes Lichen plano pilaris [LPP], Discoid lupus erthematosus [DLE], Pseudopelade of Brocq [POB] in the descending frequency order. Infrequent causes are central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, Keratosis Spinulosa Declavans [KSD], alopecia mucinosa, Acne Keloidalis Nuchae (AKN), folliculitis declavans, frontal fibrosing alopecia, dissecting cellulitis, erosive pustular dermatosis and non specific end stage CA (3). Causes for secondary CA include infections, trauma, granulomatous condition, sclerosing disorders, neoplasm, hereditary disorders and developmental defects. Patients with CA generally have symptoms like burning, itching, discharge and scaling leading to significant scarring of their scalp which can be a major psychosocial concern for them (4). Hence, early diagnosis, identification of the causative factors and prompt treatment is crucial.

A non invasive modality like Dermoscopy is very useful to identify and diagnose scalp conditions leading to alopecia (5). Dermoscopic examination shows features like loss of follicular opening, follicular pustules and scattered single hair follicle (6). Histopathological correlation aids as a confirmatory tool for diagnosis (7). In addition to distinguish cicatricial alopecia from non cicatricial alopecia, it is classified as lymphocytic and neutrophilic based on the predominant infiltrate (8). Even though the aetiolopathogenesis of CA have been noted, there is a paucity of published literature in it. Dermoscopy may aid in early diagnosis, monitor the disease progression, response to therapy and to identify the reactivation of the disorder. This study was done to identify the characteristic features for the diagnosis and differentiation of primary CA and to find the concordance between the dermoscopic and histopathological findings. Though similar studies are found in literature, they are done mostly in caucasian skin type. The novelty of this study is that it is conducted in skin of colour that has significantly distinct features in reaction patterns and also in clinical predominance of certain dermatoses.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted in Dermatology Outpatient Department of a tertiary care centre of Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from November 2016 and September 2017. Prior to the commencement of the study, Institutional Ethical Committee approval (No.08122016) and informed consent was obtained from patients. Total 50 new clinically diagnosed CA cases were randomly selected for the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients having following findings for diagnosis of CA -

a) On clinical examination, absence of follicular ostia
b) Histologically, the presence of follicles replaced by fibrous stellae and
c) Dermoscopic features of interrupted honeycomb pattern of pigmentation, absence of follicular openings, presence of fibrotic bright white dots and irregularly distributed/absent pin point white dots were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have been treated earlier with either topical or systemic therapy were excluded.

Study Procedure

Detailed case history with reference to the duration, its onset and development, other associated dermatological findings and symptoms like itching, scarring and pain were documented. Presence of predisposing features like infection and trauma along with relevant family and personal history were noted. Dermatological examination including the lesion morphology, location, dimensions and number were documented along with Hair pull test. Presence of hair loss in other sites were noted along with a complete dermatological examination. Routine blood investigations were done. In pertinent cases Culture and Sensitivity Pus (C&S), Woods lamp examination, scraping to rule out fungal infections, Mantoux, HIV, VDRL and antinuclear antibodies were done. Using a non polarised dermoscope trichoscopic examination was performed in the scalp. The alopecia lesions were clinically examined and both the central margin and the peripheral margin were noted and photo images were documented. Scalp biopsy was taken from active border with both horizontal and vertical sections stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).

Statistical Analysis

Using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 23.0, the data collected was analysed. For categorical variables, frequency and percentage analysis were done. In categorical data to note the significance, Chi-square test was done. A p-value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Fifty cases diagnosed clinically as CA which had not undergone any prior treatment, were enlisted for this study. Among 50 patients, 22 (44%) were males, and 28 (56%) females with the mean age of 35.46±15.03 years. The number of cases with CA were maximum in the age group of 31-40 years 15 (30%) followed by 21-30 years 11 (22%), 41-50 years 10 (20%), 4-20 years 7 (14%), 51-60 years 5 (10%) and above 60 years 2 (4%). Total 48 patients (96%) had a gradual onset. The range of disease duration was from 8 months to 220 years, with a mean duration of 3.96±4.5 years. Total 29 (58%) patients had multiple lesions and 21 (42%) had localised involvement of alopecia in the scalp. The focal type (patchy involvement of alopecia) was noted in 86%, and diffuse type ( diffuse involvement of the scalp) in14%. The vertex of the scalp was the most common site involved (60%). Concomitant skin lesions were noted in 20% of CA cases and the most common being DLE (Table/Fig 1).

The aetiology of various type of CA are summarised in (Table/Fig 1). The most common cause of primary CA was LPP 15 (30%). The other less frequent causes noted were AKN 2 (4%) and 1(2%) each of KSD, Graham Little Picardi syndrome (GLP) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Amongst the secondary causes of CA, naevus sebaceous 2 (4%) and trauma 2 (4%) were the most common.

The clinical features of various type of CA are summarised in (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3). In patients with LPP, 11 were males and 4 females. The involvement was most common in the vertex followed by parietal area (Table/Fig 4). Irregular areas of scarring alopecia associated with perifollicular erythema and papules around the emergence of hair shaft were noted [Table/Fig-2a]. Itching was a predominant symptom in 7 (46.6%) patients (Table/Fig 4). Oral Lichen planus was noted in 1 (6.6%) and cutaneous lesions of Lichen planus in 2 (13.3%) patients. DLE was noted in 4 male and 9 female cases. The vertex was the commonest site of involvement in both sexes. There were many erythematous, scaly, depigmented and atrophic plaques with marginal hyperpigmentation. In 3 (23%) cases other body site lesions were noted. One patient has scalp DLE with associated SLE [Table/Fig-2b].

One patient presented with features suggestive of GLP like violaceous lesions of scarring alopecia of the scalp along with axillary non scarring alopecia and follicular type of lichen planus in the back. Features suggestive of POB were seen in one male and two females, presenting as multiple reticular irregular lesions of varying sizes that were white and atrophic. Classical foot print in snow appearance was noted in two cases. The lesions were asymptomatic with no signs of inflammation [Table/Fig-2c]. A single case of KSD was presented with cicatricial plaques with few pustules [Table/Fig-3a]. Both patients of AKN were males and presented with cicatricial plaque with papulonodules and pustules in the occipital scalp and posterior neck [Table/Fig-3b]. Lipoid proteinosis were clinically presented with atrophied waxy papules seen over the occiput [Table/Fig-3c].

On dermoscopy, follicular opening was absent in all 50 (100%) cases and epidermal atrophic changes in 41 (82%). Thick peripilar cast surrounding most of the hairshafts, erythema and blue grey dots were typically noted in cases with LPP [Table/Fig-2d]. Linear and thick arborising blood vessels were mostly seen in cases of DLE along with loss of pigment and brownish discolouration in the interfollicular area [Table/Fig-2e]. POB was characterised by absent follicular opening and background shades of white and beige [Table/Fig-2f]. Classic white dots, pustules and atrophy were seen in KSD [Table/Fig-3d]. AKN was characterised by erythemaous papules, peripilar cast and whitish atrophic areas [Table/Fig-3e]. Lipoid proteinosis presented with features like brownish discolouration, atrophy and whitish areas [Table/Fig-3f]. Statistically significant differences in frequency of dermoscopic signs were noted among the various causes of primary CA (Table/Fig 5). Significant follicular features similar to all subtypes on trichoscopic examination was absent. Significant variation across various subtypes under follicular features noted were follicular pustules in KSD, follicular plugging in LPP, AKN and peripilar cast in LPP. In perifollicular and interfollicular features, significant variation across various subtypes documented were thick arborising blood vessels in DLE and perifollicular erythema in both DLE and AKN. Fibrous connective tissue in place of hair follicles was documented in all 50 (100%) cases.

The most common histopathological feature was basal cell vacuolization (54%), followed by hyperkeratosis (52%), and follicular plugging (46%). Others like pigmentary incontinence (36%), perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate and hypergranulosis each (30%), epidermal atrophy (28%) were also noted. LPP was characterised by hypergranulosis, basal cell degeneration with pigmentary incontinence and interface dermatitis [Table/Fig-2g]. Epidermal atrophy, keratotic plugging, focal basal cell degeneration with infiltrate consisting of plenty of lymphocytes were noted in DLE [Table/Fig-2h]. In POB epidermal atrophy, hair follicle atrophy with absent inflammatory infiltrate were noted [Table/Fig-2i]. In KSD, there was empty follicles with scant perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate in a oedematous dermis [Table/Fig-3g]. Flaky hyperkeratosis, plenty of lymphocytic infiltrate around epidermal appendages were noted in AKN [Table/Fig-3h]. Lipoid proteinosis was characterised by epidermal atrophy, pinkish hyaline deposits with atrophic hair follicle [Table/Fig-3i]. Follicular atrophy was the most common HP feature noted in all the subtypes. Keratotic follicular plugging varied significantly across the various lesions (DLE, LPP, AKN) and most common lesion associated with the feature was DLE. Pigmentary incontinence varied significantly across DLE, LPP and most common lesion associated with the feature was LPP. Hypergranulosis was significantly noted only in LPP (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

Primary CA is a group of disorders where the follicles are replaced by fibrosis resulting in permanent hair loss (3). The follicle is the primary focus of the inflammatory reaction (9). Whiting DA (2) has described that primary CA comprises 7.3% of all patients of hair loss. United Kingdom (UK) survey conducted by Griffin LL et al., (10) reported about 9.6% new patients of primary CA detected every year. There are very few documented studies from India on CA (11). This study was undertaken to identify the features diagnostic of CA primarily based on clinical findings, dermoscopic patterns and histopathological examination and to identify the basic aetiological causes. In this study, 80% of CA were of primary causes with only 20% secondary. LPP and trauma were the most common primary and secondary causes, respectively. The dermoscopic features of absence of follicular opening, thick arborising blood vessel and pustules were significant along with histopathological features of follicular plugging, basal cell vacuolization and hyperkeratosis in this study.

A retrospective study done by Whiting DA (2) reported CA in 7.3% of all cases of hair loss with a primary to secondary CA ratio of 4:1 which was in concordance with present study. Minor variations were noted when comparing similar research conducted in China by Qi S et al., (12). The constitution of age group ranged from 5-74 years in this study, with 31.7 years as the mean age, and extent of disease ranging from 1 month to 10 years with an average duration of 1.8 years. In the index study, the age range was 4-68 years, with 35.46 years as the mean age, and period of disease ranging from 8 months to 20 years, with an average duration of 3.96 years. A majority of CA patients (30%) were in the age group of 31-40 years. This clinical difference may be due to the varied ethnic and demographic features reported in Caucasian skin type when compared to skin of colour in the index study. The longer disease duration indicates the slower and progressive development of CA. Hence an earlier clinical diagnosis of CA can halt the disease development. The female (56%) to male (44%) ratio in the present study was 1.3:1 which was similar to studies by Olsen EA et al., (13) (1.6:1), and Thakur BK et al., (14) (2:1). This shows a female predominance when compared to the males affected. The slight variation in the ratio can be due to the geographical differences.

The most common primary CA subtype noted in this study was LPP 15 (30%) followed by DLE 13 (26%), POB 3 (6%), AKN 2 (4%) and GLP1 (2%). Also, the most common subtypes were DLE 13 (22%), LPP 2 (3.4%), POB 9 (15.3%) as reported by Qi S et al., (12); DLE 10 (41.7%), LPP 5 (20.8%), POB 2 (8.3%) as reported by Thakur BK et al., (14); and DLE 38 (33.9%), POB 27 (24.1%), LPP 25 (22.3%) as reported by Tan E et al., (9). This finding can be ascribed to the increased occurrence of Lupus erythematoses in skin of colour when compared to Caucasian skin (15). Further, due to the limited time frame of this study and lesser number of primary CA cases noted there was paucity of subtypes like alopecia mucinosa, folliculitis declavans and dissecting cellulitis of scalp.

Very limited research on secondary CA have been documented in India. In a study conducted by Kumar UM and Yelikar BR (16) in secondary CA, there were 4 cases of morphea and one each case of lupus vulgaris, congenital absence of skin, burn and sarcoidosis. On comparison with the present study, there were 3 cases of trauma/radiation, 2 cases of naevus sebaceous and one each case of trichilemmal cyst, lipoid proteinosis, seborrheic keratosis, En coup de sabre and Gunther’s disease. This variation may be because the present study was based on clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological findings, whereas the other study was based on histopathological features only. Further due to the shorter duration of the present study it was not possible to find a substantial number of cases with secondary CA presentation.

Dermoscopy is a non invasive instrument which provide hints for clinical diagnosis and biopsy site localisation (6). The characteristic feature of CA in dermoscopy is lesser density of hair and loss of follicle ostia in almost all patients (4). LPP is characterised by peripilar casts and blue grey dots and patches. GLP is a variant of LPP with CA of the scalp and non CA type in associated other sites with follicular type of lichen planus. There is similarity with the dermoscopic and histopathological findings of LPP. These features of dermoscopy had a positive correlation with LPP (p-value <0.01). Unique dermoscopic feature of thick arborising and linear blood vessels was noted only in DLE (77%), and this finding was statistically significant (p-value <0.001) when compared to other subtypes of CA. This was comparable to research done by Thakur BK et al., (14) (80%). Also red dots, corresponding to follicular openings surrounded by dilated vessels, considered a good prognostic factor was not seen in the index patients (17). This is similar to the findings by Thakur BK et al., (14) but in contrast to that by Qi S et al., (12). The latter study reported the feature in 25% of DLE cases. This may be due to the factor that red dots may not be a prominent dermoscopic feature of DLE in skin of colour (14).

Pseudopelade of Brocq (POB) is a slowly progressive scarring alopecia characterised by asymptomatic, non inflammed reticulate lesions localised to the central scalp. The dermoscopic finding of POB, noted in the present study, was white atrophic areas with loss of follicular opening. This dermoscopic feature was similar to the study conducted by Thakur BK et al., (14). A study by Qi S et al., (12) reported the dermoscopic features of POB like arborising vessels and pinkish white appearance. This finding was not documented in the present study, because of the darker skin type of the patients. The classical dermoscopic features of AKN (hair follicle tufting, ingrown follicles) were not documented in the current study, due to the lack of cases. Absence of follicular opening was the common dermoscopic feature shared along with secondary CA. Seborrheic keratosis and naevus sebaceous were presented with yellowish globules, crypts, cerebriform surface changes and fat finger structures. Thus, dermoscopy may aid as a screening tool for a presumptive diagnosis that further can be established with biopsy.

Biopsy of the scalp is vital for the precise clinical diagnosis and in differentiating the types of CA (18). They are classified primarily into lymphocytic, neutrophilic and mixed type based on the histopathology (8). In the present study, lymphocytic infiltration was seen in 38 (95%) cases of primary CA. A mixed inflammatory infiltrate was seen in only 2 (5%) cases of AKN. This is similar to a study conducted by Kumar UM and Yelikar BR (16) who reported 23 (96%) cases of lymphocytic infiltration and one (4%) case of mixed infiltrate (folliculitis decalvans). Qi S et al., (5) reported a predominant neutrophilic infiltration in 33 (56%) cases which may be due to the higher proportion of folliculitis decalvans and dissecting cellulitis was documented. The reason for these differences could be related to the shorter time limit of this study and other attributable causes like geographical variations and ethnic factors.

Hypergranulosis, basal cell vacuolization, pigmentary incontinence and lichenoid interface dermatitis in upper perifollicular region were seen in most of the cases of LPP (19). In a study conducted by Thakur BK et al., (14), similar features were documented but in addition perifollicular fibrosis was also noted. This variation may be due to the scalp biopsy done at an earlier stage of LPP in this study as concentric perifollicular fibrosis develops at a later stage as the disease progress. Patches of DLE showed epidermal atrophy, keratotic follicular plugging, focal basal cell vacuolization and both dermal and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate. Apart from similar findings thickened basement membrane was also noted in a study conducted by Kumar UM and Yelikar BR (16), which may signify a late stage of DLE. Atrophy of epidermis and absent follicles and sebaceous glands were noted in POB cases. Fibrous tract replacing follicle was also seen in addition to the above findings in a study by Qi S et al., (12). These variations may be due to the scalp biopsy done in different stages of CA. Flaky hyperkeratosis with predominant periappendageal lymphocytic infiltrate was seen in AKN. Characteristic perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate with limited atrophic follicles was noticed in KSD. No other dermatological features or loss of eyebrows were documented in the patient that are predominantly seen in males. KSD is a X-linked genodermatoses and females are carriers or have milder symptoms. In secondary CA, features like scantiness of hair follicles with atrophic epidermis were common. Lipoid proteinosis cases had hyaline material deposition amid rete ridges which stained with Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS). Both the naevus sebaceous cases had epidermal hyperplasia with papillomatosis and multiple sebaceous glands that were mature. Obvious acanthosis and papillomatosis were noted in seborrheic keratosis. Trichilemmal cyst has abrupt keratinisation with foci of calcification. Among the above features atrophic follicles, hypergranulosis, follicular keratotic plugs and pigment incontinence were statistically significant (p-value <0.05). Similar statistical significance in keratotic follicular plugging and follicular atrophy was noted by Qi S et al., (12) and Thakur BK et al., (14). In their study vacuolization of basal cells, neutrophilic folliculitis, perifollicular lymphocytic infiltration, parakeratosis was also found to be significant (p-value <0.05). These differences can be ascribed to the number variations and morphological staging of specific CA among these studies. Four patients in the present study had clinically cicatrised lesion with absence of follicular ostia in dermoscopy. Histopathologically, apart from epidermal thinning and atrophic follicles, other findings were indecisive. They were documented as non specific primary CA. Moure ERD et al., (20) reported 13 cases of non specific CA amongst 38 patients.

Limitation(s)

A limitation of this study is lack of documenting clinical types of primary CA like folliculitis decalvans, dissecting cellulitis and alopecia mucinosa. Also, the small number of cases were noted in secondary CA. This can be attributed to the inadequate time duration of the present study.

Conclusion

Primary CA are rare conditions and hence an increased awareness is essential to improve its outcome. Dermoscopy provides diagnostic clues in differentiating DLE and LPP from other primary CA and biopsy site localisation. Histopathology is the final confirmatory diagnostic means to identify the etiology of primary CA when characteristic clinical and dermoscopic features are absent. Some patients of primary CA may be indecisive in histopathology also and are categorised under non specific CA. These cases must to be periodically followed-up as they may evolve into a specific type at a latter point.

References

1.
Olsen E, Sten K, Bergfeld W, Cotsarelis G, Price V, Shapiro J, et al. Update on cicatricial alopecia. Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings. 2003;8(1):18-19. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Whiting DA. Cicatricial alopecia: Clinic-pathological findings and treatment. Clin Dermatol. 2001;19(2):211-25[crossref][PubMed]
3.
Somani N, Bergfeld WF. Cicatricial alopecia: Classification and Histopathology. Dermatol Ther. 2008;21(4):221-37. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Ross EK, Tan E, Shapiro J. Update on primary cicatricial alopecias. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(1):01-37. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Jain N, Doshi B, Khopkar U. Trichoscopy in alopecias: Diagnosis simplified. Int J Trichology. 2013;5(4):170-78. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Tosti A. Dermoscopy of hair and scalp disorders: Pathological and clinical correlations. Illustrated ed. USA: CRC Press; 2007:51-53. [crossref]
7.
Puri N, Puri A. A clinical and histopathological study of cicatricial alopecia. Our Dermatol Online. 2013;4(3):311-15. [crossref]
8.
Stefanato CM. Histopathology of alopecia: A clinicopathological approach to diagnosis. Histopathology.2010;56(1):24-38. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Tan E, Martinka M, Ball N, Shapiro J. Primary cicatricial alopecias: Clinicopathology of 112 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(1):25-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad. 2003.04.001. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Griffin LL, Michaelides C, Griffiths CEM, Paus R, Harries MJ. Primary cicatricial alopecias: A U.K. survey. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(3):694-97. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Inchara YK, Tirumalae R, Kavdia R, Antony M. Histopathology of scarring alopecia in Indian patients. Am J Dermatopathol. 2011;33(5):461-67. Doi: 10.1097/DAD. 0b013e318201abcd. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Qi S, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Li S, Cao H, Zhang X. Clinical features of primary cicatricial alopecia in Chinese patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol and Leprol. 2014;80(4):306-12. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Olsen EA, Hordinsky MK, Price VH, Roberts JL, Shapiro J, Canfield D, et al. Alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines-Part II. National Alopecia Areata Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(3):440-47. Doi: 10.1016/j. jaad.2003.09.032. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Thakur BK, Verma S, Raphael V. Clinical, trichoscopic and histopathological features of primary cicatricial alopecias: A retrospective observational study at a tertiary care centre of North East India. Int J of Trichology. 2015;7(3):107-12. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Joseph AK, Windsor B, Hynan LS, Chong BF. Discoid lupus erythematosus skin lesion distribution and characteristics in Black patients: A retrospective cohort study. Lupus Sci Med. 2021;8:e000514. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kumar UM, Yelikar BR. The spectrum of histopathological lesions in scarring alopecia: A prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(7):1372-76. Doi: 10.7860/ JCDR/2013/5138.3131.
17.
Tosti A, Torres F, Misciali C, Vincenzi C, Starace M, Miteva M, et al. Follicular red dots: A novel dermoscopic pattern observed in scalp discoid lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:1406-09. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Miteva M, Tosti A. Dermoscopy guided scalp biopsy in cicatricial alopecia. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(10):1299-303. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mehregan DA, Van Hale HM, Muller SA. Lichen planopilaris: clinical and pathologic study of forty-five patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(6 Pt 1):935-42. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Moure ERD, Ricardo Romiti, Maria Machado, Neusa Yuriko Valente. Primary cicatricial alopecias: A review of histopathologic findings in 38 patients from a Clinical University Hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clinics. 2008;63(6):747-52.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55269.16695

Date of Submission: Jan 27, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 28, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 07, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 01, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 06, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jul 04, 2022 (14%))

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com