Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 42752

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : YC05 - YC09 Full Version

Efficacy of Open versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises on Dynamic Balance and Health Status in Individuals with Osteoarthritis of Knee Joint: A Quasi-experimental Study


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51079.16766
Roopa Rajendra Desai, Ashwini Ravindranath Damsam, Tushar Jaikrishna Palekar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor and Principal, Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Roopa Rajendra Desai,
Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: roopa.desai@dpu.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis is an inflammatory disorder characterised by changes in the biomechanics, biochemistry and genetic background of joint cartilage and subchondral bone. When distal parts move freely throughout exercises in a weight-bearing position, the phrase open kinetic exercises is employed. Closed kinetic exercises are employed in a weight-bearing position when the body travels through a hard and quick distal phase.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of Open Kinetic Chain (OKC) and Closed Kinetic Chain (CKC) exercises on dynamic balance and health status in individuals with osteoarthritis of knee joint.

Materials and Method: A single-blinded experimental study was conducted from April 2020 to May 2021 at Dr D.Y. Patil college of Physiotherapy, Pimpri-Chinchwad area, Pune, Maharashtra, India. A sample of 30 subjects with unilateral osteoarthritis of knee joint, between the age of 40-60 years of both genders, were recruited. They were divided into open kinetic group (Group A) and closed kinetic group (Group B) using convenient sampling method. Y-balance and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) (Pune CRD version) were used as outcome measures-preintervention, post two weeks and post four weeks of intervention. Data normality was tested by Shapiro-wilk test. Significance was tested using paired t-test within the groups for WOMAC and Y-balance test. Unpaired t-test was used between the groups.

Results: Among 30 subjects, 17 were males and 13 females. There was a significant improvement in dynamic balance (p-value=0.001) and WOMAC (p-value=0.001) in both the groups. In group A, preintervention mean values for WOMAC was 41.2±10.53, and post four weeks of intervention it was 34.53±10.12 (p-value=0.001). Preintervention mean for Y-balance test was 0.554±14.6 and after four weeks of intervention mean was 0.586±13.8 (p-value <0.001). In group B, preintervention mean for WOMAC was 40.87±8.33, and after four weeks of intervention, mean was 30.47±7.22 (p-value=0.001); while preintervention mean for Y-balance test was 0.583±7.8 and after four weeks of intervention, mean was 0.645±7.0 (p-value=0.001).Between groups, analysis showed p-value=0.051 for both groups post four weeks of intervention.

Conclusion: The study concluded that CKC exercises are more effective than OKC exercises in improving dynamic balance and decrease in pain, stiffness, and improving physical function in knee osteoarthritis.

Keywords

American college of rheumatology criteria, Fall prevention, Y-balance test, Western ontario and mcmaster universities index of osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease that affects the articular cartilage, resulting in a painful joint and reduced joint activities (1). Pain has an inhibitory impact, resulting in decreased voluntary activation, atrophy of type II muscle fibres, and defensive reflexes. Muscular deficiencies caused by osteoarthritis of the knee might result in muscle weakness and strength (2).

In people aged 40 and above, the global prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was determined to be 22.9 %. Also, the global incidence was found to be 203 per 1000 individuals (3). In people aged 65 and up, the prevalence rate of osteoarthritic knee ranges from 22% to 39%, with the rate continuously increasing with age (4). According to Kellgren and Lawrence scale (5), the prevalence of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in India is 28.7%, whereas according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, the prevalence is 41.1 % (6).

Clinical features of knee osteoarthritis are pain, joint stiffness, bone enlargement and swelling. All these factors lead to decreased active as well as passive range of motion in osteoarthritic individuals. Prolonged movement impairment in larger joints like hips, knees or elbow results in fixed flexion deformity (7). Initially the pain becomes worse with weight bearing and ambulation. Progression of the disease leads to pain, day and night as loss of cartilage leads to bone-to-bone contact (8). Risk factors are ageing, joint injury and trauma, obesity, genetics, anatomical aspects, postmenopausal women (7).

Balance is an essential component of all these activities including other activities of daily living (9). It is been observed in individuals with osteoarthritis that muscles get atrophied controlling the hip and knee and there is a reduced ankle strength, thus the biomechanics gets altered during the activities such as walking. For proper walking function, plantar flexion power of an ankle is very important (10). Dynamic balance is an ability of a motor system where a person can quickly adjust the sections of a body according to the activities performed which puts pressure on the knee joint. Body has it’s own capacity to maintain upright position due to it’s dynamic strength (11). Takacs J et al., found that the potential factors that are responsible for dynamic balance impairment in knee osteoarthritic individuals are muscle strength and knee range of motion according to community balance and mobility scale which may lead to falls in future (12). A study conducted in Malaysia concluded that individuals with mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis have impaired static as well as dynamic balance which increases the risk of fall (13).

Various treatment approaches for knee osteoarthritis are aerobic exercises, resistance training, balance and proprioception, stretching, aquatic therapy, pilates (14),(15). The term “open kinetic exercises” refers to workouts performed in a weight-bearing stance with distal portions moving freely throughout. Closed kinetic exercises are performed in a weight-bearing position as the body moves through a hard and quick distal phase Cho T et al., proved in his study that after giving CKC exercises, improvement was seen in electromagnetic activities of all components of quadriceps femoris muscle, whereas, OKC exercises did not show significant improvement on vastus lateralis muscle (16).

Also, CKC exercises help in co-contraction of other groups and body weight provides additional resistance, whereas OKC are very effective for isolated strengthening of quadriceps (17). There are many research studies done to compare OKC exercises and CKC exercises to improve strength (18), but very few of these studies have focused on improving dynamic balance. Hence, the purpose of this study was to find the efficacy of OKC exercises and closed kinetic chain exercises on dynamic balance and health status and also to see the effect on individual components of WOMAC in osteoarthritis of knee joint. Primary outcome was Y-balance test and secondary outcome was WOMAC.

Material and Methods

A single-blinded experimental study was conducted from April 2020 to May 2021 at Dr D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee with ref. no. DYPCPT/IEC/08/2020. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry no. CTRI/2021/01/030389. The sample size was estimated to be 30 with α error of 0.02 and 80% of power with reference to a previous study (18).

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with unilateral osteoarthritis of knee joint, age ranging between 40 to 60 years of both genders, subjects with tibiofemoral and patellofemoral osteoarthritis, having primary osteoarthritis of knee joint according to ACR criteria were included.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with acute knee synovitis, advised for total knee replacement, secondary osteoarthritis, lower extremity amputations, received any intra-articular injections were excluded.

Procedure

Subjects were assigned using chit method into

• Group A- OKC exercises which consisted of dynamic quads, short arc terminal extension, straight leg raise and hamstring curls and
• Group B-CKC exercises which consisted of mini-squats, step-ups and step-down (forward and backward), lunges and standing wall slides.

All the necessary COVID-19 precautions were taken like wearing mask, maintaining social distancing, avoidance of overcrowding, presanitising and postsanitising of hands as well as equipment used in the study. At the end of each treatment session hot-pack was given to all the subjects (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3).

Progression of exercises:

• Open kinetic chain exercises
• Closed kinetic chain exercises

The outcome measures used were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC Pune CRD version) (19) and Y-balance test (20). All subjects were assessed before, post two weeks and post four weeks of intervention.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was analysed for demographic variables and significance by using Winpepi version 4.0 and Primer of biostatistics version 7.0 software. Data normality was tested by Shapiro-wilk test and data was found to be normally distributed. Significance was tested by Paired t-test within the groups for WOMAC and Y-balance test. Between the groups, analysis was done by Unpaired t-test. A p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

In the present study, (Table/Fig 4) give details of demographic data of the participants that include mean age, gender distribution in both groups.

(Table/Fig 5) indicates intra group and inter group comparison of Y-balance scores in group A and B. Intra group comparison revealed that there was improvement in dynamic balance at the end of two weeks and four weeks of intervention in both the groups. However, CKC exercises showed better improvement in Y-balance scores when compared between groups after four weeks of intervention.

(Table/Fig 6) indicates the comparison of sub scores of WOMAC in both groups. Within groups analysis showed improvement in all the components of WOMAC post four weeks of intervention in CKC exercise group. However, better improvement was seen in functional ability component for CKC exercises when compared between groups.

Discussion

The purpose of the study was to assess the effects of open chain exercises and closed chain exercises in individuals with knee osteoarthritis with respect to dynamic balance and health status. Dynamic balance is the ability of the body to maintain balance while the body is moving but keeping its centre of gravity over the base of support (21).

Improvement was observed after four weeks of intervention in OKC exercise group as well as CKC exercise group in terms of dynamic balance. OKC exercises has been found to identify strength deficits and improve muscle performance of individual muscles or muscle groups thus, supporting the joint for dynamic stability (22). Alghamdi MA et al., stated that OKC exercises, which are non weight-bearing involves less in wear and tear of the joint cartilage, prevents the disease progression, and also help purely in improving strength of the muscles rather than just improving the functional status of an osteoarthritic individual, thus promoting dynamic stability (23).

The CKC exercises also showed significant improvement in Y-balance scores. These exercises control more of muscular stabilisation to control joints and structures proximal and distal to the targeted joint and also resemble our day-to-day functional activities. Thus, these help in improving the dynamic stability of joints (22). These exercises causes the co-contraction of agonist and antagonistic muscles and also stimulate the intra and extra-articular mechanoreceptors which improves muscle strength, provides increased articular stability, increases proprioception, improves body awareness that consequently reflects in the control of body positioning during daily activities, and also helps in postural control which helps in preventing falls (2),(24). Mehta K and Sorani D stated that when OKC and CKC exercises were compared for pain, range of motion and functional performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis for two weeks, it was found that CKC exercises were more effective than OKC exercises because CKC exercises consist of movements over multiple joints which involve more than one muscle groups (25).These exercises help in recruiting more muscles like quadriceps, hamstrings, hip flexors, soleus, and gastrocnemius in a very short time period which includes reduced shearing forces, increased joint compression, and improves the stability of joints. These also help in enhancing the movements as the CKC exercises are more related to daily life functional activities which helps promote dynamic stability (22). Balance control includes both reliable sensory and motor involving sufficient muscular force. Hence, improvement of either sensory or motor components may improve balance performance. Dannelly BD et al., studied female participants to evaluate the effect of closed and OKC exercises on balance through Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). After 13 weeks of training, it was found that there was significant improvement in balance of both lower extremities in posteromedial direction. The SEBT that was used in their study focused on the ability to reach while standing on one leg in eight reach directions (26). However, the present study measured by Y-balance test, measured balance in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.

Wilk KE et al., investigated tibiofemoral joint kinetics and Electromyography (EMG) activity of quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles during open and closed kinetic chain exercises. They concluded that with CKC exercises, there was significant greater compressive force as compared with OKC knee extension. Also, they concluded that co-contraction of quadriceps and hamstrings is not produced in all closed kinetic exercises, but the magnitude of co-contraction depends on trunk position relative to knee joint (27).

The pain component of WOMAC scale showed significant improvement after four weeks of intervention with OKC exercises. Reduction of pain following quadriceps strengthening exercises leads to increased stability of the knee joint. The findings are in agreement with another study, which suggests that quadriceps strengthening may activate pain suppressing β-endorphins and help in gate control mechanism by regulating pain perception. It also improves blood flow and cartilage nutrition (28).

All the components of WOMAC showed significant improvement after four weeks of intervention with CKC exercises in terms of pain relief, decrease stiffness and improved functional ability. Verma S, conducted a study, wherein they compared OKC exercises with CKC exercises along with hot packs in knee osteoarthritis and revealed that CKC exercises were more effective than OKC exercises in terms of quadriceps muscle strength and functional status of women with knee osteoarthritis. In recent years, much importance has been given for CKC exercises in terms of rehabilitation as it replicates functional movements (29).

Limitation(s)

Long-term follow-up after intervention could have been assessed. Further studies can be done taking combined kinetic chain exercises into consideration.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that both OKC and CKC exercises improved dynamic balance and help in reducing pain, stiffness and improving physical function, when administered for four weeks in patients with osteoarthritis of knee joint. However, CKC exercises showed better improvement in terms of physical function. Hence, these can be included as routine exercises for knee osteoarthritis patients to improve dynamic balance and health status.

References

1.
Salehi-Abari I. 2016 ACR revised criteria for early diagnosis of giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Autoimmune Dis Ther Approaches. 2016;3(1):119.
2.
Molla RY, Sadeghi H, Kahlaee AH. The effect of early progressive resistive exercise therapy on balance control of patients with total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2017;33(4):286-94. [crossref]
3.
Cui A, Li H, Wang D, Zhong J, Chen Y, Lu H. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26(29):100587. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(5):518-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Kumar H, Pal CP, Sharma YK, Kumar S, Uppal A. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis using Kellgren and Lawrence scale in Indian population. Nat J Clin Orthop. 2020;11(1):S125-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Singh AK, Kalaivani M, Krishnan A, Aggarwal PK, Gupta SK. Prevalence of osteoarthritis of knee among elderly persons in urban slums using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):JC09-11. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7763.4868. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Yunus MH, Nordin A, Kamal H. Pathophysiological perspective of osteoarthritis. Medicina. 2020;56(11):614. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Desai R, Franklin CV, Rathi M. A Study on ankle traction and interferential therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of knee joint. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2017;8(3):64-68. [crossref]
9.
Hinman RS, Bennell KL, Metcalf BR, Crossley KM. Balance impairments in individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: A comparison with matched controls using clinical tests. Rheumatology. 2002;41(12):1388-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Webb R, Cofré Lizama LE, Galea MP. Moving with ease: Feldenkrais method classes for people with osteoarthritis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:479142. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Joshi SM, Sheth MS, Jayswal MM. Correlation of core muscles endurance and balance in subjects with osteoarthritis knee. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2019;8(5): 347-51. [crossref]
12.
Takacs J, Krowchuk NM, Garland SJ, Carpenter MG, Hunt MA. Dynamic balance training improves physical function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(8):1586-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Khalaj N, Abu Osman NA, Mokhtar AH, Mehdikhani M, Abas WA. Balance and risk of fall in individuals with bilateral mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92270. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Mora JC, Przkora R, Cruz-Almeida Y. Knee osteoarthritis: Pathophysiology and current treatment modalities. J Pain Res. 2018;1(11):2189-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Mazloum V, Rabiei P, Rahnama N, Sabzehparvar E. The comparison of the effectiveness of conventional therapeutic exercises and Pilates on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2018;31:343-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Cho T, Hwangbo G, Lee D, Lee S. The effects of closed and open kinetic chain exercises using elastic bands on electromyographic activity in degenerative osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(9):1481-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Olagbegi OM, Adegoke BO, Odole AC. Effectiveness of three modes of kinetic chain exercises on quadriceps muscle strength and thigh girth among individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Physiother. 2017;7(9):01-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Chhabr HK, Sathya P. Effect of conventional exercises with balance training & only conventional exercises in patients with osteoarthritis of knee. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng. 2015;4(7):5048-56. [crossref]
19.
Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT. 2009;4(2):92-99.
20.
Carol A. Oatis. Kinesiology, The Mechanics & Pathomechanics of Human Movement. 2nd ed. Chapter 5: Biomechanics of Cartilage. 2009; p76-79
21.
Kwon YJ, Park SJ, Jefferson J, Kim K. The effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on dynamic balance ability of normal healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci . 2013;25(6):671-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic Exercises, Foundation and Techniques. 6th ed. Chapter 6: Resistance Exercise for Performance; 2012; p186-190.
23.
Alghamdi MA, Olney S, Costigan P. Exercise treatment for osteoarthritis disability. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2004;24(5):326-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Ferreira LG, Genebra CV, Maciel NM, Arca EA, Fiorelli A, Vitta AD. Multisensory and closed kinetic chain exercises on the functional capacity and balance in elderly women: Blinded randomized clinical trial. Fisioter Mov. 2017;30(1):259-66. [crossref]
25.
Mehta K, Sorani D. A comparative study to determine the effectiveness of three modes of kinetic-chain exercises on pain, range of motion and functional performance in patients with osteoarthritis of knee. Int J Health Sci Res. 2021;11(2):19-25.
26.
Dannelly BD, Otey SC, Croy SC. The effectiveness of traditional and sling exercise strength training in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(2):464-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Wilk KE, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Andrews JR, Boyd ML. A Comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces and electromyographic activit during open and closed kinetic chain exercises. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1996;24(4):518-27. Doi:10.1177/036354659602400418. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Olagbegi OM, Adegoke BOA, Odole A. Effectiveness of combined chain exercises on pain and function in patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2016;15(2):178-88. [crossref]
29.
Verma S. Comparing open kinetic chain with closed kinetic chain exercise on quadriceps strength and functional status of women with osteoarthritic knees. Medicina Sportiva. 2012;8(4):1989-96.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51079.16766

Date of Submission: Jun 26, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 11, 2021
Date of Acceptance: May 23, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 08, 2021
• Manual Googling: Apr 19, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 02, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com