Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 34770

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : ER01 - ER06 Full Version

Histomorphological Spectrum and Immunohistochemical Features of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour: A Series of Eight Cases


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57738.16887
Sneha Samir Babaria, Anupama Dayal, Himali P Thakkar, Deepak S Joshi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, GCS Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, GCS Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. 3. Resident Doctor, Department of Pathology, GCS Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, GCS Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sneha Samir Babaria,
903, Shyamvrund Apt, Opp. Dhananjay Tower, Anand Nagar Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad-380015, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: sneha_babaria@yahoo.com

Abstract

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) are rare tumours of the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT), consisting of <1% of all primary GIT neoplasms. Recent studies show an increased incidence, which may be due to improved diagnostic facilities. In contrast to the literature’s judgement and the findings of many Western research, which state that the stomach is the most common place, it was observed that the small intestine was more common. Consequently, the goal of this case series was to characterise the clinicopathological, histomorphological, and immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs as well as their risk categorisation in accordance with the modified Miettinen and Lasota’s algorithm. Eight patients with GISTs diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2020 at tertiary care centre of Gujarat, India are presented in this case series. There was one young woman among the patients, others were middle or old age male or female and had a median age of 58.5 years. The most typical presentation was abdominal pain, albeit in one instance it was an unexpected discovery. One example of extra Extra GISTs (EGIST), where there were several retro and intraperitoneal masses, and one small intestinal GIST each had lymphoma as the tentative clinical diagnosis. Predominant spindle cell morphology was observed in contrast to other studies. Even if molecular studies are not available in resource-limited countries, the basic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel is the most useful in the final diagnosis. Risk stratification criteria are helpful for prognostication and further management with the use of appropriate targeted therapies.

Keywords

Miettinen and lasota, Mitosis, Risk stratification, Spindle cell

The GISTs arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal, the pacemaker cells, comprising <1% of all primary GIT tract neoplasms (1). The peak age of occurrence is 60-65 years, equally affecting males and females, which may be detected incidentally radiologically or present with abdominal symptoms (2). More than 60% of them take place in the stomach. EGIST occur in the omentum, mesentery, retroperitoneum, and perineum. Histomorphologically, GISTs are hypocellular to densely cellular lesions (1). The identification of primary mutations in KIT (tyrosine-protein kinase) (75-80%) or Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PGFRA) (7-15%) genes by IHC has revolutionised the diagnosis and led to the development of targeted therapy (1). The diagnosis and treatment of small GISTs are important as surgery is the mainstay of treatment in Asian countries as compared to medical therapy in western countries. Optimal treatment of GISTs requires a team effort, including gastroenterologists, surgical and medical oncologists, pathologists, and radiologists (3). This case series was done to study the clinicopathological, histomorphological, and IHC spectrum of GISTs along with their risk stratification according to the modified Miettinen and Lasota’s algorithm (4). The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging (TNM) 8th edition was used for staging and grading (5). Following permission from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Clinical Research (No. 289/2021) was approved, eight patients with GISTs diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2020 are presented in this case series.

Case Report

Case 1

A 36-year-old man presented to the Department of Surgery with chief complaints of epigastric discomfort for a month and vomiting for five days. A well-defined, spherical, broad-based isoechoic lesion measuring 4.3x3.4 cm with central anechoic cystic regions was seen on Ultrasound Sonography (USG), emerging from the wall of the pylorus producing luminal compression and stomach dilatation. A comparable tumour was detected using Contrast-Enhanced Computer Tomography (CECT), which raised the probability of GIST. Based on clinical findings and radiological investigations, the possibility of GIST or leiomyoma was considered. The histopathology laboratory received a 0.5 cm size upper GI scopy biopsy which microscopically showed mainly moderate chronic inflammation with no submucosal tissue. Eventually, excision of mass with distal stomach, pylorus and omentum was performed. Grossly, a submucosal tumour in region of pylorus measuring 4.0x3.5x3.0 cm was seen. The cut surface of the tumour was well-circumscribed, greyish-white with a few cystic areas. Sections from the tumour showed spindle cells arranged in fascicles and whorls with a round to oval nucleus with minimal pleomorphism and eosinophilic cytoplasm with pointed ends (Table/Fig 1)a. Mitosis was <5 per 20-25 hpf (high power field). Omentum was free from metastasis. A diagnosis of spindle cell tumour, suggestive of GIST, grade G1, very low-risk category was given. Strong, diffuse IHC positivity for CD117 (Table/Fig 1)b and vimentin confirmed the provisional diagnosis. S-100 was weakly positive and desmin was negative, which excluded neural and smooth muscle origin tumours. For six months there was no recurrence after which the patient was lost to follow-up.

Case 2

A 75 year-old-male consulted a general surgeon at the Outpatient Department (OPD) for symptoms of increased frequency of stool with difficulty in defecation for six months and weakness for one year. For 20 days he felt a mass in the left iliac fossa. On the CECT abdomen, an 8.5x7.3 cm size lesion was reported in the left hypochondrium, heterogeneous with postcontrast enhancement and non-enhancing necrotic areas. Depending on clinical and radiological grounds, a probable diagnosis of GIST or carcinoma was given. Well-defined necrotic lesions were also noted in the bilateral inguinal and iliac region, 3.8x3.0 cm on the right-side and 2.8x2.3 cm on the left-side. Multiple fluid density cystic lesions were seen in the liver with water lily sign, the largest measuring 15.3x11.3 cm. The possibility of multiple hydatid cysts was suggested. Biochemical investigations were normal. Peroperatively, multiple soft tissue masses were seen bulging on the outer surface of the jejunum. Multiple, nodular, soft to firm tumours were received, the largest measuring 3.0 cm. On cutting, greyish-white with haemorrhagic areas were seen. Histomorphologically mainly round to oval epithelioid cells with vesicular nuclei and moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm were seen, suggestive of epithelioid variant GIST (Table/Fig 2)a. The tumour was graded as G2 with mitosis >5 per 20-25 hpf, high-risk category. CD 117 and vimentin were positive (Table/Fig 2)b,c, while S-100 was weakly positive, confirming GIST and excluding neural tumours. Negative Cytokeratin (CK) and chromogranin ruled out carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumour. Follow-up was not possible due to a change in contact number.

Case 3

A 70 year-old-female with the complaint of left-side abdominal pain and decreased appetite for 20 days presented to the surgical OPD. For two days she developed a fever and noticed a mass. Clinically, the provisional diagnosis was lymphoma. During the CECT abdomen, a well-defined heterogeneous soft tissue density lesion of 5.4x4.1 cm was seen in mesentery in the left lumbar region with few necrotic areas (Table/Fig 3). Radiologically, the lesion was suggested as GIST. Intraoperatively, a mass arising from the jejunum was revealed. Part of the small bowel with a 6.0x4.5x4.0 cm size tumour was received for a histopathology examination. The tumour was lobulated, adherent to mesentery with a greyish-white, solid cut surface. Haemorrhagic, cystic areas were also identified. Histomorphologically, diagnosis of spindle cells variant of GIST (Table/Fig 4)a with mitosis >5 per 20-25 hpf, G2, and high-risk assessment was given. IHC for CD117 was positive, S-100 was weakly positive and CD 34 was negative. There was no adverse event during one month follow-up after which the patient lost to follow-up.

Case 4

A 62 year-old-male presented to the Medical OPD with symptoms of abdominal pain for one month, nausea, and vomiting for two days. There was a past history of tuberculosis 15 years ago with anti-Koch’s treatment for six months. He was referred to the Surgery Department. The CECT showed a mass measuring 5.0x5.0 cm arising from the ileum, and the possibility of a neoplastic lesion was suggested. The provisional diagnosis was a probability of carcinoma causing intestinal obstruction. Part of ileum with a mass was received for histopathological examination. Grossly, the tumour was well-circumscribed, protruding out from the intestinal wall, 4.5x3.5x3.5 cm in size with a nodular external surface. Cut section was solid with haemorrhagic and focal necrotic, cystic areas. Histomorphologically, it was diagnosed as a spindle cell variant GIST (Table/Fig 4)b. Mitosis was <5 per 20-25 hpf. The tumour was G1 in grading with a low-risk assessment for recurrence or metastasis. IHC markers CD117, and vimentin were positive, while desmin, actin were negative, ruling out leiomyoma. The patient was followed up till date with good clinical and radiological outcomes.

Case-5

A 65 year-old-male came to the Emergency Department with a complaint of severe abdominal pain for two days. He was referred to the surgeon. On CECT, a 13.0 x 11.0 cm mass was revealed in the right abdomen, suggesting a retroperitoneal mass. The possibility of a carcinoma, sarcoma, or tumour of neural origin was raised. A CT-guided biopsy was taken which was inadequate for evaluation, and was followed by excision biopsy. A single, well-circumscribed mass arising from ileum with adherent mesentery was received for pathological examination. The tumour measured 13.0x11.0x7.0 cm with greyish-white, partially solid, and cystic cut surface with haemorrhagic and necrotic areas. Tumour showed histomorphology of epithelioid GIST with mitosis>5 per 20-25 hpf, G2 and high-risk behaviour (Table/Fig 5). A diagnosis of epithelioid GIST was confirmed. S-100 and CK were negative. The patient died within a month of the operation.

Case 6

A 55 year-old-male visited surgery OPD for symptoms of abdominal pain for 20 days with off and on nausea and vomiting. He was operated on for an intestinal mass one month ago in an outside hospital, but documents were not preserved. On per-abdominal examination, the abdomen was soft and a previous operative scar was seen. No obvious lump was found. Postoperative CECT revealed large mass with adherent jejunum and colon with peri-hepatic fluid collection and air in the right sub diaphragm; possibility of pneumoperitoneum was suggested. The peritoneum showed multiple nodules (Table/Fig 6). Considering the clinical history and radiological findings, recurrence or inadequate excision or metastasis of the mass was suspected. Right hemicolectomy with omentum and peritoneal seeding was received for histopathology examination. On gross examination, 10.0x8.0x5.5 cm size greyish-white tumour in jejunum involving of 3.0 cm segment and in filtrating the adherent colonic wall. Sections studied showed a mixture of spindle cells and epithelioid cells and was reported as mixed variants of small intestinal GIST, G2, mitosis >5per 20-25 hpf, high-risk behaviour (Table/Fig 7). Tumour cells invaded the colonic wall with metastasis in the peritoneum. Pericolonic lymph nodes and omentum were uninvolved. IHC CD117 and CD 34 were positive while S-100, CK, and EMA were negative ruling out epithelialand neural tumour. This patient expired within one month of treatment.

Case 7

A 29 year-old-female consulted a general surgeon in the OPD of the hospital for a mass in the right iliac fossa which was found incidentally during routine USG carried out three months ago outside. There was an operative history of caesarean section and a scar of it was identified during abdominal examination. Repeat USG revealed a well-defined hypoechoic cystic lesion in the right iliac fossa measuring 8.3x5.7 cm in size stating the possibility of a mass. On USG-guided biopsy, a diagnosis of spindle cell neoplasm with the possibility of leiomyoma, neural tumour or GIST was given, and IHC was advised. This was followed by excision of mass with segment of the ileum, colon, omentum and lymph nodes. Grossly, a submucosal,, nodular, greyish-white tumour located in the ileum, near the ileocecal region, adherent to colon, measuring 10.0x9.0x8.0 cm was identified. The cut surface was solid with many necrotic, cystic and haemorrhagic areas. Spindle cell variant GIST, G1, mitosis <5 per 20-25 hpf with moderate risk category was reported (Table/Fig 8)a. Tumour cells invaded adherent colonic wall, however, pericolonic fat, omentum and lymph nodes were uninvolved. The tumour was CD117 positive with negative CD34 and S100. Adjuvant chemotherapy (Imatinib) was given for 3 years. Patient outcome to date has been good without recurrence or metastasis.

Case 8

A 46 year-old-male presented to Surgery Department with a complaint of abdominal pain for five months. CECT showed multiple, lobulated, inhomogeneously enhancing solid masses with internal necrosis, scattered throughout the abdomen and pelvis with possibilities of disseminated neoplastic aetiology or lymphoma. The provisional clinical diagnosis was lymphoma or germ cell tumour. Serum alpha-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen were normal. The USG-guided biopsy showed proliferation of malignant spindle cells as well as round cells with abnormal mitosis, increased vascularity and areas of necrosis suggestive of malignant soft tissue neoplasm. IHC was not performed as tissue was insufficient. Multiple retro and intra peritoneal nodular tumours with the largest measuring 12.0x9.0x7.0 cm were received for histopathology. Cut surface was greyish-white, solid, firm with multiple necrotic and haemorrhagic areas. Extensive IHC panel for malignant soft tissue neoplasm revealed positive CD117, CD34, vimentin, BCL-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2), SMA and focal positivity for S-100 and EMA. Ki- 67 proliferative index was 70%. Desmin, HMB-45, calretinin, CD99, Pan CK, and CD45 were negative, ruling out synovial sarcoma, carcinosarcoma, malignant melanoma, and lymphoma. The final diagnosis of a mixed variant of EGIST, G2 with mitosis >5 per 20-25 hpf, high-risk behaviour was given (Table/Fig 8)b,c. Till now one year and six months have passed with no adverse events. A summary of eight cases is depicted in (Table/Fig 9), (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

GISTs have an annual incidence of 10 cases per million populations (1). In the present study, the majority of cases were observed between the fifth and seventh decades, with a median age of 58.5 years. There was a slight male predominance. Abdominal pain was the predominant symptom. Similar findings were noted by Indian authors as well as western studies and are shown in (Table/Fig 11) (6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12). This tumour was found incidentally in the case of a 29-year-old female, who was notified at the time of routine USG. Presenting symptoms of GISTs are variable depending upon the site of origin. Upper GIT GISTs produce GI bleeding, while lower GIT GISTs are responsible for symptoms of acute abdomen. EGISTs usually present as an incidental finding or with abdominal mass and anaemia (1).

As per Miettinen and Lasota’s algorithm, location is an important prognostic factor. Gastric GISTs have a favourable prognosis as compared to intestinal GISTs (4). This study showed the small intestine as the most common site (75%) similar to findings of Indian authors, whereas a large study of 76 cases from Bangkok and other studies found the stomach as the most common site (Table/Fig 11) (6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12). Whether there is a regional difference in location or whether it is related to better imaging and diagnostic modalities in developed countries need to be studied in large studies.

In 5 (62.5%) cases, high mitotic counts of 20 -25 per hpf were found, and the average tumour size was 8.8 cm. At the same time, Miettinen M et al., (13) and Jumniensuk C and Charoenpitakchai M (12) correlated high mitotic count with metastasis, while Miettinen et al., (13) found high mitotic activity along with tumour size as the most powerful prognostic indicators. Since GISTs are predominantly intramural lesions, they present late with larger tumour sizes. Large tumours frequently show intra-tumoural haemorrhage, cystic degeneration, and adhesions with intestinal loops (2). Similar to other studies (7),(8),(10), present study also found that the majority of GISTs were > 5 cm in size and had intestinal adhesions.

Spindle cell morphology was predominant in this series, where tumour cells were arranged in sheets and short fascicles, followed by epithelioid and mixed types. These findings were similar to the observations seen in other studies (7),(10),(12),(14). Gastric GISTs have spindle cell morphology and low-risk behaviour (14). The present study revealed a single case of gastric GIST that showed similar findings. Epithelioid-type morphology is usually common in small intestinal locations associated with high-risk behaviour (15). Similarly, four out of six cases of small intestinal GISTs in the present study were of high-risk behaviour, with two of them showing epithelioid cell morphology and one showing mixed morphology.Predominant high-risk category was noted in the present study in concordance with other studies (Table/Fig 12) (7),(10),(12),(14).

Postoperative follow-up was available in five out of eight cases. Three patients had high-risk factors for progressive disease (G2), of which two expired. Peritoneal metastasis was observed at the time of presentation in one case of small bowel GIST and one case of ExtraGIST, both presenting with high mitotic counts. The liver, peritoneum, and lungs are the most common sites of metastasis and can develop as long as 30 years after the removal of the primary tumour (15). Langer C et al., reported tumour size >5 cm, small bowel origin, high-grade, and tumour rupture as predictors for recurrence (16). Tumours that rupture during surgery and GISTs that show mucosal invasion have a worse prognosis. Both these criteria are not currently included in various risk stratification schemes (1). However, utmost care must be taken to prevent intraoperative tumour rupture.

Due to the advent of targeted therapy for GISTs and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) molecules, IHC is crucial in the differential diagnosis (1). Generally, 98% of small intestinal and 95% of gastric GISTs are KIT positive. All cases in this study were positive for KIT (CD117), which was similar to various studies in the literature (8),(10),(11),(12),(14). Recently, it has been found that the stomach is a common site for SDH-deficient GISTs, which should be confirmed by the loss of expression of SDH by IHC as it guides the treatment protocol (1). This study showed 37.5% positivity for CD34. The majority of GISTs are positive for CD34 (70%), but it is also immunoreactive in a large group of other tumours, such as solitary fibrous tumours. This marker is no longer included in the primary panel for suspected GISTs (1),(15).

Surgical removal of the lesion is the mainstay treatment of GISTs, especially in the Asian region (3). Unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic GISTs are treated with TKI (1). Only one case of a young female having a tumour with a highrisk of progression and a small intestinal location was treated postoperatively with Imatinib (TKI). The indication of TKI was young age along with high-risk features.

As GISTs are rare tumours and this study was only four years in duration, a limited number of cases could be studied. Also, IHC was not done in some patients due to financial constraints, further leading to exclusion. Further genetic mutation analysis could not be done at our institute as infrastructure for molecular studies is as yet not available at our institute. Despite being a case series, authors could establish that, even in resource-constrained settings, morphology, risk assessment criteria, and the basic IHC panel are still the most useful for the final diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic guidance.

Conclusion

GISTs can present with varied clinical presentations with indolent to aggressive behaviour. Some regional differences in location and morphology were found, with the small intestine as the most common location, similar to other Indian studies, in contrast to western studies. Accordingly, epithelioid morphology (aggressive behaviour) was more common in small intestinal GISTs. Even if molecular studies are not available in resource-limited countries like India, the basic IHC panel is the most useful in the final diagnosis. Risk stratification criteria are helpful for prognostication and further management with the use of appropriate targeted therapies. Larger studies are required, especially from Asian countries, to look for regional differences that may be helpful in the framing of guidelines specific to the Asian region.

References

1.
Goldblum JR, Folpe AL, Weiss SW, eds. Enzinger and Weiss's Soft tissue Tumours. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc; 2020:614-35.
2.
Fletcher CD. Diagnostic histopathology of Tumours. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc; 2021:443-71.
3.
Nishida T. Asian consensus guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal Tumour: What is the same and what is different from global guidelines. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:11. Doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.01.07. PMID: 29552662; PMCID: PMC5847913. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23(2):70-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2006.09.001. PMID: 17193820. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3_2. [crossref]
6.
Lopes LF, Ojopi EB, Bacchi CE. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour in Brazil: Clinicopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics of 513 cases. Pathol Int. 2008;58(6):344-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02235.x. PMID:18477213. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Alqusous ST, Rabadi OJ, Omari AD, Abbasi NN, Haddadin SW, Rawabdeh SM, et al. Clinicopathologic spectrum of gastrointestinal stromal Tumours; Six years experience at King Hussein Medical Center. JRMS. 2016;23(1):11-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12816/0023353. [crossref]
8.
Ud Din N, Ahmad Z, Arshad H, Idrees R, Kayani N. Gastrointestinal stromal Tumours: A clinicopathologic and risk stratification study of 255 cases from Pakistan and review of literature. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(12):4873-80. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.12.4873. PMID: 26163607. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Gupta A, Suri V, Goyal N, Chhabra S, Garg A, Bhati G, et al. Histomorphological spectrum of gastrointestinal stromal Tumours- An institutional experience in a series of seven cases. Adesh Univ J Med Sci Res. 2020;2(2):112-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25259/AUJMSR_33_2020. [crossref]
10.
Sengupta R, Bose A, Sivakumar P, Patel P, Das R, Mandal S, et al. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST): Is the incidence rising in India?-A hospital based analysis. Int J Health Clinl Res. 2020;3(12S):235-43.
11.
Minhas S, Bhalla S, Jauhri M, Ganvir M, Aggarwal S. Clinico-pathological characteristics and mutational analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours from India: A single institution experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(10):3051-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.10.3051. PMID:31653154. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Jumniensuk C, Charoenpitakchai M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour: clinicopathological characteristics and pathologic prognostic analysis. World J Surg Onc. 2018;16(231):01-09. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1532-1. PMID: 30509310. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and moleculargenetic studies of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(1):52-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000146010.92933.de. PMID: 15613856. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Gaopande VL, Joshi AR, Bhayekar PD, Khandeparkar SG. Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (ten cases) and extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (six cases) with review of literature. J Curr Res Sci Med. 2016;2(2):84-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2455-3069.198367. [crossref]
15.
Goldblum JR, Lamps LW, Mckenny JK, Myers JL. Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: ElsevierInc; 2018:551-52.
16.
Langer C, Gunawan B, Schüler P, Huber W, Füzesi L, Becker H. Prognostic factors influencing surgical management and outcome of gastrointestinal stromal Tumours. Br J Surg. 2003;90(3):332-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4046. PMID:12594669. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57738.16887

Date of Submission: May 12, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 07, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 07, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 03, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 30, 2022 (10%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com