Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 127417

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : MC01 - MC05 Full Version

Prevalence of Asymptomatic Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Adenoid Hypertrophy and its Relation to Adenoid Size: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58920.16912
Sherin Maria Augustian, Rajan Kezhaeplackal Vasu, Anjana Mary Reynolds

1. Junior Resident, Department of ENT, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of ENT, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anjana Mary Reynolds,
Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences,
Thiruvalla-689101, Kerala, India.
E-mail: dr.anjanamaryreynolds@pimsrc.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) occurs as a sequela of adenoid hypertrophy. But most often hearing loss due to OME goes unnoticed in children. This causes poor cognitive development, inattention and thus poor scholastic performance.

Aim: To estimate the frequency of asymptomatic OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy and to find the association between adenoid size and occurrence of OME and hearing loss.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care centre in South India from November 2019 to November 2021. Children of 5-12 years of age, with symptoms suggestive of adenoid hypertrophy and with no complaints of hearing loss, were selected. A detailed ear, nose, throat examination, Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) and tympanometry were done in all patients. Adenoid size was graded by nasal endoscopy using Mc Murray and Clements scale and also based on radiographs (comparing the distance between maximum convexity of adenoid and line drawn along basiocciput (A) and posterior part of hard palate and sphenobasioccipital synchondrosis (N)) using A/N ratio. All patients subsequently underwent adenoidectomy. Myringotomy was done along with adenoidectomy in cases with bilateral OME. All OME patients were followed-up with tympanometry, one month and three months postoperatively. The frequency of OME was presented as percentage. The association between adenoid size and asymptomatic OME as well as hearing loss was done using Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 150 children between 5-12 years with adenoid hypertrophy were analysed. The mean age was 9 years. On analysing the association between adenoid size (both radiographically and endoscopically) and OME, 30 (20%) had bilateral effusion and 18 (12%) had unilateral effusion and prevalence of asymptomatic OME was calculated as 32%. Most of the patients had Grade 2 adenoids radiographically, and Grade 3 adenoids as per nasal endoscopy. Majority of patients had Type B Tympanogram. There was significant association between OME and adenoid size. Association between adenoid size with hearing loss showed significant association between the two with p=0.001 on right ear and p<0.001 on left ear (radiographically), and p=0.0027 on right ear and p=0.043 on left ear (as per nasal endoscopy). About 93% of children with bilateral Type B tympanogram and all children with unilateral Type B and bilateral Type C returned to normal on three months follow-up.

Conclusion: There was association between adenoid size, and occurrence of OME and hearing loss. About 32% of the study population were detected to have asymptomatic OME.

Keywords

Hearing loss, Pure tone audiometry, Tympanometry

The OME is the collection of non purulent serous fluid in the middle ear. It commonly occurs in children, the most common cause being adenoid hypertrophy. OME presents clinically with hearing loss, dull aching pain, and autophony. These symptoms are often recognised early in adults, but these subtle changes most often remain unnoticed in children (1). Adenoid hypertrophy in children presents as mouth breathing, snoring, nasal obstruction and persistent nasal discharge. These are often treated by primary healthcare physicians as upper respiratory infections and are often not dealt with by a specialist, there by missing the findings in ear. In a developing country like India, the number of children seeking medical treatment for nasal symptoms are much less, as most of them resort to home remedies (2). This in turn leads to unrecognised OME. The hearing loss produced as a sequela of OME is often recognised much later by teachers or parents when they notice inattention, poor scholastic performance and poor social behaviour (3),(4). Hearing loss as low as 15 decibels (dB) can prove to be at risk for poor academic performance (5).

A study conducted by Garg S et al., showed a prevalence of conductive hearing loss of 10.3% irrespective of the age (6). Another Indian study done among adults and children showed the cause of reversible deafness due to serous otitis media to be 3% without specifying the impact on children (7).

Kocyigit M et al., in their study on 589 Turkish patients, showed adenoid hypertrophy in 58 patients (9.8%). Also 94 (15.9%) had asymptomatic OME. Among children with adenoid hypertrophy, 10.3% had type B Tympanogram (8). Not much studies were conducted in India regarding the occurrence of asymptomatic OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy and subsequent hearing loss. Bhat V et al., found 36% prevalence of asymptomatic OME in patients with adenoid hypertrophy and, 40% of them with bilateral Type B tympanogram had significant conductive hearing loss of more than 25 dB (9). Another study by Diksha et al., on 57 patients, showed unilateral OME in 14% and bilateral OME in 24.6% (10). The present study aimed to find out the prevalence of asymptomatic OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy and also aimed to evaluate the relation between adenoid size and occurrence of OME and hearing loss.

Material and Methods

The present prospective cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, in a tertiary care centre in Southern India during the period November 2019 to November 2021. Ethical committee clearance was obtained for the study by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). (No. PIMSRC/E1/388A/49/2019). Conservative sampling method was chosen as the sampling method.

Inclusion criteria: Children in the age group of 5-12 years who presented with adenoid hypertrophy clinically and showed radiological evidence of adenoid hypertrophy and who did not have any ear symptoms were selected for the study.

Exclusion criteria: Children with history of suppurative otitis media or tympanic membrane perforation, children with complaints of hearing loss, children with cleft palate and those who underwent surgical repair for the same, nasopharyngeal tumour or mass other than adenoid hypertrophy were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated considering the proportion of asymptomatic OME among children with adenoid hypertrophy (p) from previous study done by Bhat V et al., with 95% confidence level and 8% precision, using the formula;

n= Z (1- α /2)2p (1-p) / d2 taking p as 36 (9).

A written informed consent was taken from caregivers. All children were assessed clinically for adenoid enlargement by taking a proper history and detailed ear, nose, throat examination. X-ray soft tissue nasopharynx lateral view was taken in all cases to assess the adenoid size. The distance between the maximum convexity of the adenoid and a line drawn along the basiocciput (A) and the distance between the posterior superior edge of the hard palate and anteroinferior edge of sphenobasioccipital synchondrosis (N) was measured. A/N ratio was calculated and graded (11),(12) as:

• Grade 0- (0.0-0.25)- No adenoid enlargement
• Grade I - (0.26-0.50) -minimal
• Grade II- (0.51-0.75)- moderate
• Grade III- (0.76-1.00)- gross enlargement

Transnasal endoscopy was done in outpatient setting for older children to assess adenoid size, and for smaller and uncooperative children, assessments were done prior to adenoidectomy under general anaesthesia. The degree of obstruction by the adenoid tissue over the posterior choana was estimated using the grading system proposed by McMurray and Clements (13):

• Grade I-Adenoid tissue filling 1/3 rd of vertical height of choana.
• Grade II- Adenoid tissue filling 2/3rd of vertical height of choana.
• Grade III-From 2/3rd to nearly all but not completely filling the choana.
• Grade IV-Complete choanal obstruction.

Tympanogram and PTA were done in all cases. Jerger’s classification for tympanogram (14) and Global Burden of Disease classification (2010) (15) for hearing loss were used for assessment. All patients subsequently underwent adenoidectomy. Myringotomy was done along with adenoidectomy in cases with bilateral OME. All OME patients were followed-up with tympanometry, one month and three months postoperatively.

Statistical Analysis

The association between adenoid size and occurrence of OME as well as hearing loss were done using Fisher's exact test. A value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed by using software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.

Results

Data from 150 cases of adenoid hypertrophy were analysed and the results were tabulated. Age of the participants ranged from 5 to 12 years with a mean age of 9 years. Out of 150 participants, 105 (70%) were males. On evaluating the symptoms of the participants, all had mouth breathing and the next common symptom was snoring (98%) (Table/Fig 1).

On examining the tympanic membrane, 108 (72%) had normal tympanic membrane on both sides, 21 (14%) had retracted tympanic membrane bilaterally and 6 (4%) had bilateral air fluid level (Table/Fig 2).

On evaluating the adenoid sizes radiographically, 90 (60%) participants had grade 2 and the rest had grade 3 adenoid hypertrophy. Among those who had grade 2 adenoid hypertrophy, 9 (10%) had bilateral effusion while 21 (35%) of grade 3 had bilateral effusion. This association was statistically significant (p=0.002) (Table/Fig 3).

Association between radiographic adenoid size and PTA findings were tabulated for both ears. The majority of the children with Grade 3 adenoids showed mild hearing loss, which was present bilaterally (Table/Fig 4).

On assessing adenoid size using nasal endoscopy, majority (82%) had grade 3 adenoid hypertrophy and 12% had grade 4 and rest had grade 2. Children with grade 2 hypertrophy had no effusion (Table/Fig 5).

On analysing the association between adenoid size (both radiographically and endoscopically) and OME, 30 (20%) had bilateral effusion and 18 (12%) had unilateral effusion and prevalence of asymptomatic OME was calculated as 32%.

Association between adenoid size by nasal endoscopy and PTA findings were tabulated for both ears. Those children with Grade 3 adenoids had mild hearing loss bilaterally which was statistically significant (Table/Fig 6).

On impedance audiometric evaluation, out of 150 participants, 30 (20%) had bilateral Type B tympanogram and 15 (10%) had bilateral Type C tympanogram; 27 (18%) had unilateral effusion in either right or left ear and rest 78 (52%) had Type A tympanogram in both ears (Table/Fig 7).

Association between tympanogram findings and PTA of the participants were calculated for both ears. Majority of patients with bilateral Type B tympanogram had mild hearing loss which was statistically significant (Table/Fig 8).

Of 45 female participants, three (6.7%) had bilateral effusion (Type B tympanogram) and three (6.7%) had unilateral effusion (Type B). Of 105 male participants, 27 (25.7%) had bilateral effusion (Type B) and 15 (14.3%) had unilateral effusion (Type B). There was no significant association between gender and occurrence of otitis media with effusion (p=0.179) (Table/Fig 9).

All patients studied underwent adenoidectomy. Among the 150 participants, 30 had bilateral effusion and they underwent myringotomy along with adenoidectomy, 18 participants had unilateral effusion and those with Type C tympanogram, myringotomy was not done. All patients with Type B and Type C tympanogram findings were followed-up with tympanogram taken after one month and three months postoperatively.

Of the 30 participants with Type B tympanogram bilaterally, 93% returned to Type A at the end of three months and two remained as such. All children with unilateral Type B and all of the 15 children with bilateral Type C returned to Type A in three months (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

OME is the accumulation of serous fluid within the middle ear. If OME persists for three months or more, the condition becomes chronic. OME usually follows an infection or inflammation of adenoids like viral upper respiratory tract infection, secondary bacterial infection, nasal allergy and leads to release of cascade of inflammatory mediators (16). OME can result in hearing impairment which leads to poor social behaviour and delayed speech and language development in children (17). Occurrence of OME in infants less 4 years can cause defect in auditory sensitivity (18). Any impairment in auditory input during the developmental stage of central auditory system plasticity in childhood, results in defective development of auditory cortex and other developmental abnormalities (19).

In this prospective cross-sectional study, 150 children between 5-12 years with adenoid hypertrophy and who required adenoidectomy were selected. The study aimed to assess the frequency of asymptomatic OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy, association between OME and adenoid size and also to find the association between adenoid size and hearing loss. Tympanometry was done for 150 children of which 32% were found to have asymptomatic OME. Those with Type B and C Tympanogram showed significant hearing loss. These results were comparable to the study conducted by Bhat V et al., in 100 children in which 36% had asymptomatic OME and they also concluded that those with bilateral Type B tympanogram had significant conductive hearing loss. But in their study no comparison was done between adenoid size and hearing loss (9). In this study, adenoid size was graded based on radiological and endoscopic findings and showed significant association between OME and adenoid size. The study by Diksha et al., in 57 children showed bilateral abnormal tympanogramin 24.6% of the patients and unilateral abnormal tympanogram in 14%. But they found no association between adenoid size and OME and adenoid size with hearing loss (10).

Skoloudik L et al., in their study on relation between adenoid size and OME, showed that adenoidectomy was more effective in children with adenoids in contact with torus tubarium compared to those with small adenoids. In this study also children with higher grades of adenoids detected both radiologically and endoscopically, showed greater number of bilateral middle ear effusions than lower grades (20). Similar study by Takahashi H et al., where transnasal endoscopy of pharyngeal opening of eustachian tube was performed in 155 patients with OME, compression of the orifice by adenoid tissue was found in 52% of the patients (21). The study by Casselbrant ML et al., concluded that OME usually occurs in the age group of 4 years and 8 years and most common symptom of OME was ear block sensation or fluctuating hearing loss. But in most cases, this remained unrecognised until parents notice delay in speech development or poor performance in school or hearing loss (22). In the present study, although children with complaints of hearing loss were excluded, 32% of the participants were found to have hearing loss which was not recognised by their parents.

The study conducted by Wallace IF et al., showed defect in language development in children with OME (23). Another study done by Sano S et al., concluded that OME which remained undiagnosed for a longer period, can damage tympanic membrane due to the action of metabolites like prostaglandins (24). So early detection of OME is important. Results from the present study clearly showed the need to evaluate for OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy, as significant number of the cases had unrecognised hearing loss, which may later lead on to deleterious effects on their social and cognitive development.

Limitation(s)

This study was done in a tertiary care centre and the subjects were children with symptoms suggestive of adenoid hypertrophy with no clinical presentation of hearing loss. But the percentage of children with adenoid hypertrophy and asymptomatic hearing loss will be significantly higher in a country like India where primary healthcare facilities are limited. Hence the study findings might not be generalisable to the common population.

Conclusion

Adenoid hypertrophy can cause OME which can lead to hard of hearing and subsequently to impaired language and behavioural development. The present study showed an association between adenoid size, and occurrence of OME and hearing loss. Also 32% of present study population were detected to have asymptomatic OME. Tympanometry is a non invasive procedure to diagnose OME. So, it should be made mandatory to screen all children with adenoid hypertrophy for the presence of fluid in the middle ear to prevent significant language and speech delay.

References

1.
Schilder AGM, Chonmaitree T, Cripps AW, Rosenfeld RM, Casselbrant ML, Haggard MP, et al. Otitis media. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2(1):01-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Mitra NK. A longitudinal study on ARI among rural under fives. Indian J Commun Med. 2001;26(1):08.
3.
Manche S, Jangala M, Koralla RM, Akka J. Prevalence of otitis media and its hearing loss in children of South Indian population. Int J Infect DIs. 2016;45(S1):334. [crossref]
4.
Lewis DE, Valente DL, Spalding JL. Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children’s speech understanding in a simulated classroom. Ear Hear. 2015;36(1):136-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear. 1998;19(5):339-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Garg S, Kohli C, Mangla V, Chadha S, Singh MM, Dahiya N. An Epidemiological study on burden of hearing loss and its associated factors in Delhi, India. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018;127(9):614-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Bashar MA, Kaur N, Begam N, Verma M. Epidemiology of childhood and adult deafness and the strategies for prevention and control in India. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol. 2017;4(6):1185.
8.
Kocyigit M, Ortekin SG, Cakabay T, Ozkaya G, Bezgin SU, Adali MK. Frequency of serous otitis media in children without otolaryngological symptoms. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;21(2):161-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Bhat V, Paraekulam Mani I, Aroor R, Saldanha M, Goutham MK, Pratap D. Association of asymptomatic otitis media with effusion in patients with adenoid hypertrophy. J Otol. 2019;14(3):106-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Diksha, Singhal SK, Gupta N, Gupta R, Verma RR. Radiological and audiological assessment in patients with adenoid hypertrophy undergoing adenoidectomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;6. https: doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02639-0. [crossref]
11.
Kolo ES, Ahmed AO, Kazeem MJ, Nwaorgu OGB. Plain radiographic evaluation of children with obstructive adenoids. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(2):e38-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Lertburapa K, Schroeder JW, Sullivan C. Assessment of adenoid size. A comparison of lateral radiographic measurements, radiologist assessment, and nasal endoscopy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(11):1281-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Wormald PJ, Prescott CA. Adenoids: Comparison of radiological assessment methods with clinical and endoscopic findings. J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106(4):342-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Lous J,Fiellau-Nikolajsen M. Epidemiology and middle ear effusion and tubal dysfunction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1981;3(4):303-17. [crossref]
15.
Olusanya BO, Davis AC, Hoffman HJ. Hearing loss grades and the International classification of functioning, disability and health. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;91(10):725-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Paradise JL, Rockette HE, Colborn DK, Bernard BS, Smith CG, Kurs-Lasky M, et al. Otitis media in 2253 Pittsburgh-area infants: prevalence and risk factors during the first two years of life. Pediatrics. 1997;99(3):318-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Gravel JS, Wallace IF. Listening and language at 4 years of age: Effects of early otitis media. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35(3):588-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
T-Ping C, Weckx LLM. ENT care of children and adolescents in the Brazilian public health system in three different municipalities. Braz J. of Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(4):571-78. [crossref]
19.
Chang M, Kanold PO. Development of auditory cortex circuits. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol JARO. 2021;22(3):237-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Skoloudik L, Kalfert D, Valenta T, Chrobok V. Relation between adenoid size and otitis media with effusion. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(6):399-02. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Takahashi H, Honjo I, Fujita A. Endoscopic findings at the pharyngeal orifice of the eustachian tube in otitis media with effusion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;253:01-02. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Casselbrant ML, Brostoff LM, Cantekin EI, Flaherty MR, Doyle WJ, Bluestone CD, et al. Otitis media with effusion in preschool children. The Laryngoscope. 1985;95(4):428-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Wallace IF, Gravel JS, McCarton CM, Stapells DR, Bernstein RS, Ruben RJ. Otitis media, auditory sensitivity, and language outcomes at one year. The Laryngoscope. 1988;98(1):64-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Sano S, Kamide Y, Schachern PA, Paparella MM. Micropathologic changes of pars tensa in children with otitis media with effusion. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(8):815-19. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58920.16912

Date of Submission: Jul 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 18, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 17, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 26, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com