Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 73935

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : OC25 - OC29 Full Version

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response in Patients with Co-morbidities in Kashmir’s Ethnic Population: An Observational Cohort Study


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56230.16910
Aaliya Mohi-Ud-Din Azad, Naveed Nazir Shah, Haamid Bashir, Adnan Hamza, Khurshid Ahmad Dar, Mir Shahnawaz

1. Senior Resident, Department of Chest Disease, Chest Disease Government Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Head and Professor, Department of Chest Disease, Chest Disease Government Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Research Scholar and Technologist, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Chest Disease, Chest Disease Government Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 5. Professor, Department of Chest Disease, Chest Disease Government Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Chest Disease Government Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aaliya Mohi-Ud-Din Azad,
Munwarabad, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
E-mail: aaliya.azad@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection risks in co-morbid patients are still unknown two years after the pandemic began. The prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for determining disease preventive and mitigation strategies. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and chronic cardiovascular disease can raise the risk of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), which has a greater morbidity and fatality rate.

Aim: To determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) antibodies and their relationship to co-morbidities in Kashmir’s ethnic population.

Material and Methods: The present observational cohort study was done in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine at Chest Disease Hospital Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from September 2020 to September 2021 and 1,846 co-morbid unvaccinated patients were chosen for the study. As per standard methodology, a cohort study was undertaken, a questionnaire was prepared, and demographic and associated parameters were recorded. All participants had their immune profiles tested, and the existence of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 was determined using the chemiluminisence immunoassay technique. Chi-square and Fischer exact test were used for stastical analyses and p-value <0.05 were taken as statistically significant.

Results: As per the present study estimates, demographic and socio-economic characteristic affected test attendants. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response among co-morbid patients were found to be 54.3%. The hypertension and diabetes were most prevalent co-morbidity found in the individuals (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Co-morbidities including hypertension and diabetes in an individual are more likely have COVID-19 which can lead to death. COVID-appropriate conduct is required to limit infection transmission in the community, and immunisation is of paramount importance for all individuals. More research is needed to determine the risk of co-morbidities among Kashmir’s ethnic community.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease-2019, Immunisation, Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2, Vaccination

SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 infectious disease causes severe and lethal symptoms, including flu-like symptoms, and fever. According to hundreds of clinical investigations, over 80% of cases have minor symptoms, whereas about 5% of cases, mostly older patients and those with co-existing diseases, develop serious symptoms such severe respiratory distress syndrome and thromboembolism (1),(2).

Due to the lack of identifiable COVID-19 symptoms, with the exception of Olfactory or Taste Dysfunction (OTD) (3),(4), diagnoses were first based mainly on Real Time Polymerase Chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNAs (5). However, due to sample difficulties and the virus’s rapid genomic change, the sensitivity and specificity were not sufficient (6),(7). Samples from the lower airway tract are required for reliable diagnosis, as described in prior SARS pandemic cases. In addition, for the initial PCR tests, the sequences of PCR amplicons were not unique, because the target sequences were the same as those of SARS, MERS, and other types of coronaviruses (8). Several investigations revealed that the sensitivity of PCR tests was 60% (9),(10). This is particularly worrisome for those at high risk, such as the elderly and immune-compromised patients, because many asymptomatic patients with negative PCR testing can unknowingly transfer infection. The health officials began a massive case-finding and contact-tracing operation. The detection of cases was based on RT-PCR testing of nasopharyngeal samples.

Seroprevalence studies can estimate the percentage of the population that has produced antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, indicating current infection with the virus. It is possible to detect mild and asymptomatic infections that have not been subjected to RT-PCR testing. Furthermore, seroprevalence studies provide an estimate of the fraction of the population still vulnerable to infection, presuming antibodies confer partial or total immunity. Serological estimation of IgG antibodies are being researched throughout the communities in order to gain a complete picture of previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure in susceptible populations. It has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 has a five-day incubation period, with IgM antibodies appearing in 5-10 days and IgG antibodies appearing in roughly 10 days following symptom onset, with greater titers in severe cases than in mild cases (11),(12). The real temporal course of antibody titers, on the other hand, is still unknown.

During COVID-19, the immune system plays a critical role, and immunological dysfunction is linked to disease severity. COVID-19 patients with severe lymphopenia and an overactive innate immune response that results in hyper-inflammation are linked (13). Many COVID-19-related co-morbidities have an impact on immune system function, which has a direct impact on COVID-19 responsiveness. Furthermore, the plethora of medicines recommended to manage these co-morbidities will influence COVID-19 progression and limit new COVID-19 therapeutic options. As the COVID-19 pandemic spreads, epidemiological evidence suggests that obesity, type 2 diabetes, and chronic cardiovascular disease can worsen the disease’s severity, resulting in a worse prognosis and outcome (14),(15). Although SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralising antibodies have been found to be greater in severely or critically ill COVID-19 patients during both the acute and convalescent stages, less investigations focusing exclusively on patients with metabolic disorders have been conducted. Because diabetes, obesity, and hypertension are becoming more common, it’s critical to understand the particular characteristics of COVID-19 infection in persons with these co-morbidities (16),(17). The aim of present study was to observe antibody response of SARS-CoV-2 in ethnic population of Kashmir.

Material and Methods

The present cohort study was conducted at Department of Pulmonology, Chest Disease Hospital, Srinagar, from September 2020 to September 2021. In this study, a questionnaire was prepared by Researchers as per World Health Organisation (WHO), Format (18), in both International English and Vernacular Language which included demographic history such as (name, age, sex, occupation), RT-PCR testing, major co-morbidities, symptoms of COVID -19. The ethical clearance was approved by Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) under Ref No: 1020/ETH/GMC. Participants were explained about the aim of the study in their local language and were interviewed by experienced medicos. Consent was taken before filling the questionnaire. For cohort research, this report follows the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) reporting guideline. The sample size was calculated by using G Power software. All the recommended tests were done free of cost and study was supported by Department of Pulmonology GMC Srinagar.

Inclusion criteria:

• Unvaccinated co-morbid patients (COVID-19 RT-PCR positive).
• The patients or their attendants who gave consent was included in the study.
• Ethnic Kashmiri patients.

Exclusion criteria:

• Vaccinated candidates.
• Non-ethnic Kashmiri patients.
• Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Procedure: Before taking the blood sample procedure was explained to each participant by doctor and consent was taken. Under all aseptic precaution around 3-5 mL venous blood sample was withdrawn from each participant by a trained laboratory technicians (phlebotomists). Red-top serum tube with a clot activator was used into which blood sample were transferred. For clotting to take place the blood sample were allowed to stand for approximately 30 minutes .The blood samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000-5000 revolutions per minute (rpm) . After calibration stored sample were tested for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. Calibration of automatic immunoassay analysers were done before each testing to enhance efficacy.

Serological IgG antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2: Fully Automated Cobase e411 immunoassay analyser was used to conduct antibody testing. The analyser works on the principle of Electro-Chemiluminisence (ECL), technology is used to detect antibodies to SARS -CoV-2 in human serum. It gives excellent low -end sensitivity and broad dynamic ranges. The sensitivity according to a study 88.48% (76.62- 84.34) and specificity was 100%. Seropositive if the index value for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody was above 1.00 as suggested by the manufacturer protocol.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.1 was used for statistical analysis (Chicago,IL). The IgG index was compared between mild to moderate instances and severe to critical cases, as well as in relation to co-morbidities, using the Chi-square and Fischer exact test. p-value <0.05 were taken statistically significant.

Results

A total of 1,846 co-morbid people were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was established in 986 co-morbid persons.

The mean age was 45±5.5 (45.75) years, and the bulk of the participants were men. The majority of those surveyed 1645 (89.1%) were non -healthcare workers, while 201 (10.9%) were healthcare workers. The most prevalent co-morbidities was hypertension 1020 (55.2%) and diabetes mellitus 434 (23.5%) followed by thyroid dysfunction 227 (12.2%). Out of 1846, 513 (27.7%) were symptomatic. 308 (16.7%) out of the 1846 people tested positive for COVID-19. 986 (53.4%) individuals out of 1846 developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Seroprevalence was 551 (55.8%) among rural population as compared to urban population 435 (44.2%). The antibody IgG response was investigated in terms of demographics and co-morbidities. It was discovered that the antibody reactivity and non reactivity numbers in the table are described independently (Table/Fig 1). In this study seroprevelance was seen in (2.5%) and (1.2%) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma patients respectively. Antibody response seen in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) was(1.2%) and chronic liver disease was (0.60%) Chronic heart diseases (0.2%). Among 1846 (0.5%) had cancer, SARS -CoV-2 antibody response was nil among them. In present study, subjects having co-morbidities like diabetes mellitus and hypertension were statistically significant (<0.005).

(Table/Fig 2) shows a full description of the patients with co-morbidities. Present study had 1846 co-morbid people. The stratification analysis was shown using a flow chart.

Antibody response was seen more in those with hypertension 488 (49.9%), Diabetes mellitus 328 (33.2%), thyroid dysfunction 113 (11.4%), COPD 25 (2.5%), Asthma 12 (1.2%), CKD 12 (1.21%), CLD 6 (0.6%), and Cancer (0%), as shown in (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

The present study was the first study of its kind in ethnic population of Kashmir having COVID-19 infectious disease with co-morbidities. The seroprevelance survey was conducted in concomitant COVID-19 patients at GMC Srinagar’s Department of Pulmonology. The seroprevalence research estimates the percentage of the population who has been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and has generated antibodies against the virus. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus to individuals having co-morbidities like Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension etc leads patient more vulnerable due to weak immune system and eventually to mortality, many studies reported that in different ethnic populations of world. As per reports of Central of Disease Centre (CDC, USA) 2021 research analysis, they have found, within 1-3 weeks after infection, antibodies (IgG) can be found in serum. The IgG and IgM rises simultaneously but IgM antibody weans off more frequently than IgG. IgG persists for several months but duration is not known. However, antibody test is not used to diagnose acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (19). Present study provides crude estimation of seroprevelance IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in co-morbid individuals. The high rate of antibody response (IgG) were perceived in rural , non health care workers, middle aged male with co-morbidties (such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus ,thyroid dysfunction). The seroprevalence in our study 986 (53.4%) among co-morbid individuals (1846), which was different with other study done by Khan SM et al., on general population in Srinagar city and they reported 26.9% of seroprevelance in co-morbid patients (20). The highest seroprevelance was present in individuals higher age (>55 years). Age based antibody response needs further studies to understand the concept of immune response of SARS-CoV -2. Study done by Khan SM et al., reported 3.8-5.2% antibody response among 55-70 years age group (20). Several studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are higher in older age group with co-morbidity (21).

As per present study data, the males shows antibody response (54.9%) that suggests they were in predominance as compared to opposite gender (45.1%). SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies seroprevelance did not differ significantly by gender, however it was slightly greater in males (54.9%). These findings were in line with what is known in the recent studies (20),(21). Some research have revealed that there is a gender difference in seroprevelance, with females having lower antibody levels.

In present study 89.1% were non healthcare workers and 10.9% healthcare workers. The study conducted in Srinagar by Salim et al, Khan SM et al., also found higher seroprevelance among non healthcare workers (20). Probable suggestive reason could be that non healthcare works doesn’t follow proper precautions to prevent COVID-19 infection. Urban regions are more densely populated than rural ones, illness transmission in the population is accelerated. As a result, the seroprevelance of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies in urban regions is expected to be greater. Present study estimated a seroprevelance of 44.1% in urban areas against 55.9% in rural areas.

Present study data also reports that the, 8.2% gave history of contact with a known lethal COVID-19 infection. 304 (30.8%) out of 986 were symptomatic IgG positive. Among symptomatic only 101 (33.2%) were RT-PCR positive. 202 (66.4%) had never undergone any microbiological testing. Majority 682 (69.1%) co-morbid individuals were asymptomatic. Among them 182 (27.2%) were RT-PCR positive. 231 (33.8%) had never undergone microbiological testing. Robust testing and vaccination should be encouraged among general population to overcome the burden of unknown infection and thus decreases the total number of infected cases. Asymptomatic individuals become a potential source of transmission of disease. Especially young socially active asymptomatic individual becomes a source of infection to the elderly family member (21),(22). One participant was IgG positive symptomatic RT-PCR negative. This can be due to false negative RT-PCR thermal inactivation, faulty technique, microbiological testing done at a date later than appearance of symptoms or false positive antibody test or poor B cell response. Small number of studies have been conducted so far regarding antibody detection in RT-PCR negative (23). 209 (24.3%) were symptomatic IgG negative out of them 18 (8.6%) were RT-PCR positive. Study was conducted in Wuhan among RT-PCR positive cases out of 310 only 2 patients were negative for both IgG and IgM antibodies (24). (Table/Fig 4), shows studies done on seroprevelance in SARS-CoV-2 and co-morbidities (20),(25),(26),(27),(28). In majority of the studies done in other parts of country, they found hypertension and diabetes are major co-morbidities related to lethality of COVID-19 patients and shows significant antibody response. Individuals with co-morbid conditions are associated with severe COVID-19 disease, hospitalisations and poor outcome. Mortality is observed more in elderly population with pre- existing co-morbid. Ageing and co-morbidity causes various changes in immune system and incapacitates the immunity to fight against infections (29). In present study 49.5% hypertensive patients developed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. A study conducted in Srinagar among general population reported that (12.1%) were hypertensive followed by thyroid dysfunction (8.5%), diabetes mellitus (5.0%) had developed antibodies (25). Hypertension has been reported as highest pre-existing co-morbidity in COVID-19. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors increases the ACE2 expression this increases risk of COVID among hypertensive patients .Patient receiving non Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Angiotensive Converting Enzyme (ACEI) were also found to develop severe diseases. More literature is required to support role of ACE in worsening COVID in hypertensive patients .WHO suggests continuing of these drugs in COVID-19 infection because of their beneficial role (30). In present study 33.3% diabetic patients developed SARS -CoV-2 antibodies .Diabetic patients have impaired immunity due to hyperglycaemia and chronic inflammation .All these factors leads increases oxidative stress and more severe COVID -19 diseases .DPP4 inhibitor is used in treating diabetes patients it impairs innate immunity (30). In present study seroprevelance is seen in (2.5%) and (2%) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma patients respectively. Individuals with pre-existing respiratory disease are at more risk of developing life threatening COVID -19 disease. 0.95% COPD patients were infected with COVID -19 in USA. In China 0.90 % asthma patients were infected due to COVID -19 (30). Antibody response seen in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) was (1.2%) and chronic liver disease was (0.60%).In meta-analysis 0.83% had CKD among COVID-19 patients. ACE2 receptors in CKD patients does not increases the susceptibility to SARS -C0V-2 infection. Study conducted in China showed that 3% COVID -19 patients had chronic liver disease (30). Chronic heart diseases (0.2%) is associated with high mortality and morbidity because cardiovascular diseases are treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitor and heart is highly expressed with ACE2 receptors .These patients are at a high risk of thromboembolism and arythmias (30). Among 1846 (0.46%) had cancer. SARS -CoV2 antibody response was nil. In other literatures the incidence of cancer was low among COVID -19 patients. 0.92% malignancy cases were reported in large Meta -analysis (30). In our study 11.4% thyroid disease patients developed antibody response. A study conducted by Hariyanto TI and Kurniawan A described, a significant association between thyroid disease and COVID-19. Thyroid hormone plays important role in innate immunity dysfunctioning of thyroid gland results in dysregulation of innate immunity (31). Further studies should be conducted with large sample size to estimate antibody response in co-morbid cases. Also it is recommended that the government authorities, therapists, and doctors need to increase public awareness of correct COVID-19 behaviours and appropriate precautionary measures need to be followed in letter and spirit in order to mitigate the transmission of the lethal disease. Patients with co-morbidities who are susceptible to infection should need to be taken extra precautions.

Limitation(s)

In present study sample size was constraint, more study are needed on large sample size across the districts of Kashmir, India.

Conclusion

Antibody positivity among co-morbid people is insignificant, with the exception of hypertension and diabetes. More research is needed in all of Kashmir’s districts in this regard. Acceptable behaviour, sufficient ventilation, and hygienic practices, in combination with governmental, business, and municipal health leadership, prevents an infectious disease from spreading. Because a greater population is still vulnerable to COVID-19, maintaining public health measures and increasing immunisation access are crucial to protect this groups health from disease, as severe COVID-19 can be visibly burdensome. Co-morbid individual have poor outcome and associated with high mortality and morbidity.

References

1.
Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Liu H, Wu Y, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. The Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):475-81. [crossref]
2.
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Nakagawara K, Masaki K, Uwamino Y, Kabata H, Uchida S, Uno S, et al. Acute onset olfactory/taste disorders are associated with a high viral burden in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;99:19-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Villarreal IM, Morato M, Martínez-Ruiz Coello M, Navarro A, Garcia-Chillerón R, Ruiz Ã, et al. Olfactory and taste disorders in healthcare workers with COVID-19 infection. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2021;278(6):2123-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Liu Y, Yan LM, Wan L, Xiang TX, Le A, Liu JM, et al. Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(6):656-57. [crossref]
6.
Gong YN, Yang SL, Chen GW, Chen YW, Huang YC, Ning HC, et al. A metagenomics study for the identification of respiratory viruses in mixed clinical specimens: An application of the iterative mapping approach. Arc Virol. 2017;162(7):2003-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, Poon LL, Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):411-12. [crossref]
8.
Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. The Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-74. [crossref]
9.
Liu R, Han H, Liu F, Lv Z, Wu K, Liu Y, et al. Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2020;505:172-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Xie C, Jiang L, Huang G, Pu H, Gong B, Lin H, et al. Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:264-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Peeling RW, Wedderburn CJ, Garcia PJ, Boeras D, Fongwen N, Nkengasong J, et al. Serology testing in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(9):e245-e49. [crossref]
12.
Zhang B, Zhou X, Zhu C, Song Y, Feng F, Qiu Y, et al. Immune phenotyping based on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and IgG level predicts disease severity and outcome for patients with COVID-19. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2020;7:157. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
García LF. Immune response, inflammation, and the clinical spectrum of COVID-19. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1441. Doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01441. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Young BE, Fong SW, Chan YH, Mak TM, Ang LW, Anderson DE, et al. Effects of a major deletion in the SARS-CoV-2 genome on the severity of infection and the inflammatory response: An observational cohort study. The Lancet. 2020;396(10251):603-11. [crossref]
15.
Murhekar MV, Bhatnagar T, Selvaraju S, Rade K, Saravanakumar V, Thangaraj JW, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: Findings from the national serosurvey, May-June 2020. J Med Res. 2020;152(1):48. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Khan SM, Qurieshi MA, Haq I, Majid S, Ahmad J, Ayub T, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies in Kashmir, India, 7 months after the first reported local COVID-19 case: Results of a population-based seroprevalence survey from October to November 2020. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e053791. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Hussain A, Bhowmik B, do Vale Moreira NC. COVID-19 and diabetes: Knowledge in progress. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2020;162:108142. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
World Health Organization. Population-based age-stratified seroepidemiological investigation protocol for COVID-19 virus infection, 17 March 2020. 2020. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331656. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
19.
CDC -Antibody testing guidelines “Interim guidelines for COVID -19 Anitbody Testing in clinical and public health setting” updated September 21,2021, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antibody-tests-guidelines.html.
20.
Khan SM, Qurieshi MA, Haq I, Majid S, Bhat AA, Nabi S, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies in District Srinagar, Northern India-A cross-sectional study. PloS One. 2020;15(11):e0239303. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Poustchi H, Darvishian M, Mohammadi Z, Shayanrad A, Delavari A, Bahadori Monfared A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in the general population and high-risk occupational groups across 18 cities in Iran: A population-based cross-sectional study. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(4):473-81. [crossref]
22.
Kronbichler A, Kresse D, Yoon S, Lee KH, Effenberger M, Shin JI, et al. Asymptomatic patients as a source of COVID-19 infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;98:180-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Jia X, Xiao L, Liu Y. False negative RT-PCR and false positive antibody tests-Concern and solutions in the diagnosis of COVID-19. J Infect. 2021;82(3):414-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Wang J, Chen C, Li Q, Cai P, Wang Z, Wang L, et al. COVID-19 confirmed patients with negative antibodies results. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):01-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Inbaraj LR, George CE, Chandrasingh S. Seroprevalence of COVID-19 infection in a rural district of South India: A population-based seroepidemiological study. PLoS One. 2021;31;16(3):e0249247. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Murhekar MV, Bhatnagar T, Thangaraj JWV, Saravanakumar V, Kumar MS, Selvaraju S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among the general population and healthcare workers in India, December 2020-January 2021. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;108:145-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Chowdhury I, Mishu, FA, Alam MM, Yasmin R, Rahman MM, Mollah FH, et al. Comparison of antibody level after SARS-CoV-2 infection in case of home treated and hospital treated patients. BIRDEM Medical Journal.2022;12(1):11-15. [crossref]
28.
Kumar D, Bhota S, Gupta G, Sood T, Kanwal S, Jaryal SC, et al. Seroprevalence of COVID-19 among Health Care Professionals (HCPs) of tertiary care hospital of northern state of India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(3):908-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Bajaj V, Gadi N, Spihlman AP, Wu SC, Choi CH, Moulton VR, et al. Aging, immunity, and COVID-19: How age influences the host immune response to coronavirus infections? Frontiers in Physiology. 2021;11:1793. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Callender LA, Curran M, Bates SM, Mairesse M, Weigandt J, Betts CJ. The impact of pre-existing comorbidities and therapeutic interventions on COVID-19. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Hariyanto TI, Kurniawan A. Thyroid disease is associated with severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. 2020;14(5):1429. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56230.16910

Date of Submission: Mar 10, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 08, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 19, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 19, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 07, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 25, 2022 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com