Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 61209

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : QC11 - QC16 Full Version

Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcome in Women with First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding: A Longitudinal Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kolkata, India


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57184.16906
Animesh Naskar, Rupsha Chowdhury, Pradip Kumar Saha, Rup Kamal Das

1. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Animesh Naskar,
Krishna Bihar, 10, Bajeshibpur, 2nd Bye Lane, Shibpur, Howrah-2, Kolkata-711102, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: animesh282@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: First trimester vaginal bleeding, a serious obstetric challenge to developing embryo, occurs in 15-25% of all pregnant women. It is a matter of great concern to both mother and obstetrician for its increased association of adverse maternal and foetal outcome.

Aim: To measure the prevalence of patients with first trimester vaginal bleeding, to evaluate factors associated with it and to assess foeto-maternal outcome in those pregnant women.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, hospital-based, longitudinal study carried out among 120 women with first trimester vaginal bleeding having normal bodyweight, and regular cycles and agreeing to follow-up, at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a tertiary teaching hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, from January 2019 to June 2020. The incidence of vaginal bleeding in first trimester, its risk factors, foeto-maternal outcome in terms of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH), abortions, preterm deliveries, Antepartum Haemorrhages (APH), birth weight of baby, low APGAR (Appearance or colour of the baby, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) score at birth were assessed. The descriptive statistics to calculate percentage and mean and Chi-square-test with significance value considered at p-value <0.05.

Results: Out of 4716 pregnant women attending in Obstetric clinic at their first trimester, 332 had vaginal bleeding, incidence being 7.04%. Out of 332 women, 120 study participants met inclusion criteria. Of 120 cases, 79 (65.8%) were from age group of 21-30 years. Highest incidence was 74 (61.7%) in primigravida. Incidence was high in poor socio-economic status (upper lower and lower) ie., 57 and unplanned cases, 87 (72.5%). On follow-up of 120 participants, 66 (55%) had threatened abortion, of them 51.5% (34/66) led to term pregnancy followed by preterm labour 39.39% (26/66) and only few, 9.09% (6/66) ended up with incomplete miscarriage. Spotting was most common nature of bleeding per vagina 41.66%, (50/120). On follow-up of 60 (90.9%) viable pregnancies, PIH was in 12 (20%) cases and abruption was seen in one (1.6%). Majority of preterm babies 65.4%, (17/26) Needed Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission.

Conclusion: Vaginal bleeding in first trimester is an indicator of the maternal and foetal adverse consequences and results of this study can enrich our knowledge to plan and manage these pregnant women adequately.

Keywords

Antepartum haemorrhages, Foeto-maternal outcome, Pregnancy induced hypertension, Threatened abortion, Vaginal bleeding

Vaginal bleeding before 12 weeks of gestation is relatively common obstetric event complicating nearly 20% of all pregnant women (1). It creates a surge of maternal apprehension and emerging evidence suggests that it may be associated with poor foetal and maternal outcomes (2).

Bleeding per vagina in first trimester can be caused by several factors. Implantation bleeding, miscarriages (threatened, inevitable, incomplete and complete miscarriage), ectopic pregnancy and cervical pathology are the major factors besides molar pregnancy leading to first trimester vaginal bleeding (3),(4). Almost 50% of pregnancies with 1st trimester bleeding, come to an end with pregnancy loss (2). Outcome of pregnancy often influenced by the gestational age at which bleeding occurs, causative factors and intensity of bleeding as well. If pregnancy continues poor maternal and foetal outcome such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, abruption, foetal growth restriction may occur (2),(3). Maternal age, systematic diseases like diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, infertility treatment, thrombophilia, maternal weight and uterine structural anomalies reported to raise the chances of abortion. Although first-trimester vaginal bleeding is a painful symptom, very little studies have been done scrupulously to explore the prevalence and predictors of bleeding. There is wide variations in estimates of prevalence of early pregnancy bleeding ranging from 7 to 24% have been reported in published literatures. Wide range in estimates is possibly due to variation in study design (5). Comprehensive understanding about current pregnancy outcome following 1st trimester vaginal bleeding is very much pertinent not only to pregnant mothers but also to her attending obstetrician to plan adequate antenatal care and early intervention to reduce the maternal and perinatal complications. To evaluate adverse foetal outcomes following first trimester vaginal bleeding, several primary studies have been attempted, but a couple of them have remarked on adverse maternal outcome (6).

This study aimed to find out the prevalence, risk factors associated with first trimester vaginal bleeding and evaluate foeto-maternal outcome in these pregnant mothers.

Material and Methods

This was a longitudinal hospital based observational study carried out at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, a Government tertiary care teaching centre in Kolkata, West Bengal, India, amongst patients attended at Outpatient Department (OPD) and Emergency Unit in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology over 18 months (one and half year) period from January 2019 to June 2020 after obtaining the Institutional Ethical Clearance through proper channel from the Institutional Ethics and Review Committee vide memo number RKC/515. Informed consent of the participants was obtained after proper counseling. For first nine months, from January 2019 to September 2019, authors enrolled the participants for the study and the next nine months i.e. from October 2019 to June 2020, and followed-up them to evaluate the maternal and foetal outcome.

Inclusion criteria: Singleton pregnancy with first trimester vaginal bleeding attending in emergency and OPD, normal body weight, regular cycle, agreed to follow-up were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Women with chronic hypertension, uncorrected hypothyroidism, uncontrolled pregestational diabetes mellitus, known smoker, women on anticoagulant therapy, women with pre-existing cervical or uterine pathology, women with history of abortifacient intake, biochemical pregnancies were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: From the previous study, it has been found that incidence of first trimester bleeding is about 8.5% in the population (2). Now using formula sample size:

z2×p× (1-P) / d2

Here, z=1.96, p=0.085, d=0.05

Sample size was about 120. Authors further include 10% to account for drop out/missing data. So, a sample of 132 but 12 of them were lost to follow-up and So, a final sample of 120 (Table/Fig 1).

Procedure

Over the study period, following admission through OPD and emergency, every study participants was subjected to a routine physical, obstetrical and Ultrasonographic (USG) examination for confirmation of gestational age and diagnosis of foetal viability (threatened, inevitable, incomplete, complete abortions, molar or ectopic pregnancy). After confirmation of foetal viability, pregnant mothers were discharged with an advice to continue pregnancy and to attend antenatal care clinic regularly. They are followed-up till delivery or final outcome and the data regarding this were collected from records of antenatal cards and Bedhead Tickets (BHT) when they were admitted for child birth in future (Table/Fig 2). All the findings and data regarding socio-demographic characteristics, detailed history, clinical presentation were noted. The class of socio-economic status of the patients was analysed on the basis of Modified Kuppuswamy scale and classified into lower middle, upper middle and low (upper lower and lower) socio-economic status (7).

Nature of vaginal bleeding experienced in study period was recorded as ‘spotting’, ‘more than spotting’ and ‘clot’. A spotting episode was noticed only while wiping, an episode having flow equivalent to usual menstrual period but lighter than heaviest day of flow of menstrual period was defined as more than spotting while an episode as heavy or heavier than usual menstrual period with passage of clots has been categorised under clots (8). Labouratory investigations and ultrasound was collected and noted carefully. Any intervention or operative procedure required in course of management of the patient was also noted. Patients contact numbers and addresses were recorded for future correspondence.

Later the pregnancy outcome was evaluated in the form of obstetrical complications like placenta previa, abruption placentae, preterm labour, hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes like prematurity, low birth-weight, low APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration) and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission. Maternal data were collected from labour-room log book, antenatal records, patient BHTs and foetal data were taken from neonatal record log books, nursery records and NICU register.

Statistical Analysis

Data was verified and entered in Microsoft Excel datasheet and all analysis was performed by using Microsoft 2010. Categorical data was represented by frequency and percentages of total cases by using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test was performed to measure the level of significance where p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Majority of the cases 97 (80.8%) were admitted via Emergency Room (ER), belonged to upper lower class socio-economic status 47 (39.2%), in age group of 21-30 years 79 (65.8%) and booked cases 75 (62.5%). Mean age was 22.9±4 years and age range was 17-35 years. Most of them (86.7%) had no history of infertility treatment and had unplanned conception (72.5%) (Table/Fig 3).

Most cases were primigravida 74 (61.7%), peak of incidence at gestational age of 6-10 weeks 76 (63.3%) and had spotting per vagina 50 (41.7%). Mean gestational age was 7 weeks 6 days±2 weeks 2 days (range=11 weeks 4 days to 4 weeks 3 days) (Table/Fig 4).

Threatened miscarriages 66 (55%) followed by incomplete abortion 41 (34.2%) were common pregnancy outcome in cases of first trimester vaginal bleeding. Spotting was the significant presentation in participants of threatened abortions. So there was definite association between nature of bleeding per vagina and diagnosis at first visit (Chi-square=84.644, p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 5).

Amongst the threatened abortions, majority 60 (90.9%) progressed to viable pregnancies of which term pregnancy 34 (51.5%) followed by preterm labour 26 (39.4%) with spontaneous onset and only a few 6 (9.09%) ended with incomplete abortion as depicted in (Table/Fig 6).

Out of 26 preterm babies 17 (65.4%) needed NICU admission while only 7 (20.6%) term babies needed NICU admission. Most of preterm babies (61.5%) and term babies (58.8%) had birth weight in the range of 2.5 to 2.9 kg. Of the preterm babies 26.9% were low birth weight and 11.5% were very low birth weight. It was also found that 38.5% preterm babies and 11.8% term babies had APGAR <7 at 1 minute (Table/Fig 7).

In this study, 16 (61.5%) of mothers who had preterm labour and 25 (73.5%) of those who delivered at term had no complication. But the result was not significant (p-value=0.66335) as shown in (Table/Fig 8). Regarding mode of delivery, both vaginal delivery and caesarean section rate was almost same (48.33% vs. 46.66%) as shown in (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

Even though, the early pregnancy vaginal bleeding is potentially appalling symptom, the present published literatures are sparse to investigate its prevalence, patterns, and risk factors. Due to wide variations in the study design and methodology, the estimations of bleeding prevalence in first trimester recorded in different studies are imprecise and ranging from 7 to 24% (9),(10),(11),(12). This makes difficult to compare the study results.

The current study showed that prevalence of first trimester vaginal bleeding was 7.04%. The incidence recorded in several other studies is shown in (Table/Fig 10) (2),(8),(10),(11),(13),(14),(15),(16).

In this study, 28.3% of participants had age <20 years, and highest incidence 65.8% was found in age of 21 years to 30 years. Mean age in the study population was 22.9±4 years. Hasan R et al., observed in their study that highest incidence (45.9%) in age group 28-34 years (5). Similar pattern of observation was reported by Kavyashree HS and Rajeshwari K, where incidence of first trimester vaginal bleeding was 70% in this age group (9). Shivanagappa M et al., also noticed first trimester bleeding per vagina was very high (69%) in age group 21-30 years (17). The study by Yasmin H et al., showed the mean maternal age was 26.53±6.36 years (18).

About 70% of study population was nulliparous (no previous viable pregnancy) and 74 (61.7%) women became first time pregnant, 22.5% had had a previous viable child birth, and 7.5% were multipara. Similar finding was reported in a study by Kamble PD et al., where 63.9% population was primigravida and 36.1% was multigravida (2). In study by Amirkhani Z et al., 56.7% patients were primigravida, consistent with the current study (4). But Kavyashree HS and Rajeshwari K, and Patel NG et al. found in their studies that multigravidas were 60% and 66% respectively (9),(19). Manonmani and Nandini, showed in their study conducted on 150 patients that 58% were primigravida (20).

Present study showed, 21.7% had a gestational age of <6 weeks, and highest incidence 63.3% of vaginal bleeding was found in gestational age ranging from 6 weeks to 10 weeks. A study by Kamble PD et al., reported incidence of pregnancy failure 77% in those with less than 6 weeks gestation (2). Shivanagappa M et al., had also observed the similar findings (17).

In the present study, it was found that 35.8% of population belonged to lower middle class, 47.5% were poor (belonging to upper lower and lower class) and 16.7% belonged to upper middle class. This finding is in concurrent with the study conducted by Zheng D et al., in China and Norsker FN et al., in Denmark which reported that lower socioeconomic status was inversely proportional to spontaneous miscarriages (21),(22).

Present study demonstrated that most frequent nature of bleeding was spotting 41.7% followed by clotting 37.5% and more than spotting 20.8%, which is comparable with study by Hasan R et al., where spotting was seen in 75.6% of subjects, light bleeding in 18.4% and 6.1% had heavy bleeding (5). Threatened miscarriages, most common (55%) pregnancy outcome in our study, were significantly associated with spotting. Of 50 patients (41.7%) who had spotting, incidence of threatened miscarriages was very high 41 (82%) and of 45 women with passage of clots, 8 (17.7%) had threatened miscarriages. This is concurrent with study report of Kamble PD et al., which demonstrated that 83.2% had spotting with abortion rate of 81.2% while 16.8% had heavy bleeding with abortion rate 96.4% (2).

Most of the threatened abortions were continued as viable gestation either term or preterm. Present study demonstrated that those with more than spotting, had incomplete miscarriage in 11.8% on follow-up, 64.7% preterm labour, 23.5% had term pregnancy. Yakştiran B et al., reported 19.06% preterm delivery among patients with first trimester vaginal bleeding (3).

In those with passage of clots, 25% developed incomplete abortion on follow-up, 62.5% went through preterm labour, 12.5% proceeded to term pregnancy. Hasan R et al., reported 24% women with heavy bleeding experienced abortion (23).

In those with spotting, 4.9% developed incomplete miscarriage on follow-up, 24.4% progressed to preterm labour, 70.7% proceeded to term pregnancy. In study by Verma SK et al., 61.7% of pregnancies with vaginal bleeding continued beyond 28 weeks and 19% had preterm birth (24). Amirkhani Z et al., showed preterm labour in 25% of patients with history of first trimester bleeding (4). Kanmaz AG et al., reported preterm labour in 6.2% patient (25).

Out of 60 viable pregnancies, 20% (n=12) women had pregnancy induced hypertension. The study conducted by Saraswat L et al., noted that incidence of PIH, preeclampsia or eclampsia was not significantly altered by bleeding in first trimester (26). The incidence of PIH (20%) in the present study was also much higher in comparison to study by Kanmaz AG et al., which reported preeclampsia in 3.8% patients (25). Incidence of abruptio placentae was found in 1 (1.5%) of the patients continuing pregnancy (n=60), in contrast to study of Amirkhani Z et al., which reported placenta abruption in 13.3% patients (4). The present study resulted into low birth weight 26.9% among preterms and 20.6% NICU admission in term new born due to low birth weight and poor APGAR whereas in the study of Kanmaz AG et al., reported incidence of low birth weight 15.8% and 11% NICU admission (25).

A systematic review performed by Saraswat L et al., demonstrated that mode of delivery was not influenced by first trimester vaginal bleeding (26), which was in agreement to the present study findings i.e., same rate of both vaginal delivery and caesarean section.

The clinical implications of this study are close monitoring and focused attention to the mothers experiencing first trimester vaginal bleeding, so that the complications in ongoing pregnancy can be minimised by providing more serious prenatal surveillance and management to them to achieve successful pregnancy outcome. The strength of the present study was that it was a longitudinal study, where the pregnant women were enrolled very early in pregnancy and several maternal and foetal outcomes were studied methodically through regular antenatal check-ups, performed weekly which enabled us detection of adverse events at earliest and judicious intervention was taken.

Optimal counseling and appropriate prenatal care with follow-up, areadvocated for the women of first trimester vaginal bleeding, especially with threatened miscarriage and those having bad obstetric history. It seems reasonable to study further to find optimal predictive factor for poor pregnancy outcome of these women.

Limitation(s)

Apart from small sample size, other limitations of this study are timing, severity, frequency, duration, and bleeding associated pain that seems to be effective factor in the end of pregnancy is not addressed here. The present study could not assess the association between threatened abortion congenital anomaly of the foetus. Long-term follow-up and prognostic evaluation also could not be done here.

Conclusion

Pregnancy complicated by first trimester vaginal bleeding is highly associated with increased maternal and foetal morbidity. Majority of early pregnancy bleeding had threatened abortions with spotting, and were nulliparous, primigravida, gestational age 6-10 weeks and belonged to poor socio-economic status. So, there is a need of close monitoring and more vigilance for providing prenatal care more seriously to the pregnant mothers following threatened miscarriage to minimise the foeto-maternal complications.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank all the patients for their co-operation and all the esteemed staff and doctors of R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital for their help in completing this work.

References

1.
Evrenos AN, Cakir Gungor AN, Gulerman C, Cosar E. Obstetric outcomes of patients with abortus imminens in the first trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(3):499-504. Doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2979-5. PMID: 23912531. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kamble PD, Bava A, Shukla M, Nandanvar YS. First trimester bleeding and pregnancy outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:1484-87. Doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog201714143. [crossref]
3.
Yakştiran B, Yüce T, Söylemez F. First trimester bleeding and pregnancy outcomes: Case-control study. Int J Wom Health and Reprod Sci. 2016;4(1):04-07. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2016.02. [crossref]
4.
Amirkhani Z, Akhlaghdoust M, Abedian M, Salehi GR, Zarbati N, Mogharehabed M, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with first trimester vaginal bleeding. J Family Reprod Health. 2013;7(2):57-61.
5.
Hasan R, Baird DD, Herring AH, Olshan AF, Jonsson Funk ML, Hartmann KE. Patterns and predictors of vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(7):524-31. Doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.006. PMID: 20538195. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Agrawal S, Khoiwal S, Jayant K, Agarwal R. Predicting adverse maternal and perinatal outcome after threatened miscarriage. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;4:01-07. Doi: 10.4236/ojog.2014.41001. [crossref]
7.
Majumder S. Socioeconomic Status Scales: Revised Kuppuswamy, BG Prasad, and Udai Pareekh's Scale updated for 2021. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:3964-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_600_21. PMID:35136753. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Hassan W, Abu-Helalah M, Salam A, Elhakim A, Bayazeed H, Latif S, et al. Incidence of early pregnancy bleeding in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:1392-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161292. [crossref]
9.
Kavyashree HS, Rajeshwari K. A study on pregnancy outcome in patients with first trimester vaginal bleeding. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:820-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161292. [crossref]
10.
Yang J, Savitz DA, Dole N, Hartmann KE, Herring AH, Olshan AF, et al. Predictors of vaginal bleeding during the first two trimesters of pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005;19:276-83. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00655.x. PMID: 15958150. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Axelsen SM, Henriksen TB, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Characteristics of vaginal bleeding during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;63:131-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(95)02236-8. [crossref]
12.
Sipila P, Hartikainen-Sorri AL, Oja H, Von Wendt L. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by vaginal bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:959-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(95)02236-8. PMID: 1477016. [crossref]
13.
Harville EW, Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Vaginal bleeding in very early pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1944-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg379. PMID: 12923154. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Zhong C, Xiong G, Lin L, Li Q, Chen X, Zhang X, et al. The association of maternal vaginal bleeding and progesterone supplementation in early pregnancy with offspring outcomes: A prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):390. Doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04711-1. PMID: 35513779. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Smits LJM, North RA, Kenny LC, Myers J, Dekker GA, Mccowan LME. Patterns of vaginal bleeding during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy and risk of pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: Results from the SCOPE study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(11):1331-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01496.x. PMID: 22762533. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Sun L, Tao F, Hao J, Su P, Liu F, Xu R. First trimester vaginal bleeding and adverse pregnancy outcomes among Chinese women: From a large cohort study in China. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(8):1297-1301. Doi:10.3109/14767058.2011.632034. PMID: 22011262. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Shivanagappa M, Sagar SG, Manoli N. Ultrasound evaluation of vaginal bleeding in first trimester of pregnancy: A comparative study with clinical examination. Int J Sci Stud. 2015;3(7):202-06.
18.
Yasmin H, Mohsin H, Korejo R. Preterm deliveries in women presenting with threatened abortion. J Surg Pak. 2015;20:01.
19.
Patel NG, Patel MS, Shah SR, Jani SK, Patel JA, Shah JU. Study of outcome of pregnancy in patients with first-trimester bleeding per vaginum. Int J Adv Med. 2014;1:230-33. Doi: 10.5455/2349-3933.ijam20141111. [crossref]
20.
Manonmani, Nandini. A study on pregnancy outcome in women with first trimester bleeding per vaginum. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS). 2016;15(8):85-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1508048587. [crossref]
21.
Zheng D, Li C, Wu T, Tang K. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: A cross-sectional study of Chinese populations. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):33. Doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0297-2. PMID: 28259178. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Norsker FN, Espenhain L, A Rogvi S, Morgen CS, Andersen PK, Nybo Andersen AM. Socioeconomic position and the risk of spontaneous abortion: A study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3):e001077. Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001077. PMID: 22734118. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Hasan R, Baird DB, Herring AH, Olshan AF, Funk MLJ, Hartmann KE. Association between first-trimester vaginal bleeding and miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):860-67. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b79796. PMID: 19888046. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Verma SK, Premi HK, Gupta TV, Thakur S, Gupta KB, Randhawa I. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by threatened abortion. J Indian Med Assoc. 1994;92:364-65.
25.
Kanmaz AG, Inan AH, Beyan E, Budak A. The effects of threatened abortions on pregnancy outcomes. Ginekologia Polska. 2019;90(4):195-200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2019.0035. PMID: 30901073. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Saraswat L, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. Maternal and perinatal outcome in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester: A systematic review. BJOG. 2010;117:245-57. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02427.x. PMID: 19943827. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57184.16906

Date of Submission: Apr 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 16, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 30, 2022 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com