Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27222

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : TR01 - TR04 Full Version

Thinking Beyond Adenocarcinoma of Prostate: A Case Series of T2W Hyperintense Prostatic Lesions


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55644.16838
Swarna, Rohit Sharma, Shalabh Jain, Anuradha Sharma, Reeta Kanaujia

1. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India. 3. Consultant, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Aakash Hospital, Dwarka, New Delhi, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anuradha Sharma,
Room No. 4, CT Scan Complex, Old Casualty Block, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
E-mail: anuradha1785@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

The T2-weighted sequences form an integral part of multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) protocol performed for evaluation of the prostate. Most commonly encountered prostatic pathologies are adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia, which are mostly T2W hypointense and heterogeneously hypointense, respectively. Apart from prostatic cysts, only a small proportion of prostatic lesions demonstrate predominantly high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Herein, the authors present three such cases with T2W hyperintense prostatic lesions. The first case (60-year-old male) was a prostatic abscess, which apart from T2W hyperintensity, showed central restricted diffusion and peripheral enhancement. The second case (40-year-old male) was a cystic lesion in left side of prostate, which was an ectopic ureterocele opening into the prostatic urethra with associated left renal agenesis. The third case (35-year-old male) was of a metastatic prostatic malignancy, which was a rare prostatic sarcoma. Radiologists should be cognizant of such conditions so as to enable them to make accurate diagnosis and guide appropriate patient management.

Keywords

Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Ectopic ureterocele, Prostatic abscess, Prostatic sarcoma

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for prostate imaging. Patients suspected to have prostatic cancer based on Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and raised Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) are evaluated with multiparametric MRI. T2 Weighted Imaging (T2WI) is the workhorse sequence for Transitional Zone (TZ) lesions; and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Peripheral Zone (PZ) lesions as per Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) (1).

Most common lesion of prostate in elderly males is Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), which has a heterogenously hypointense whorled appearance with intact hypointense pseudocapsule on T2WI (2). Second most common lesion is adenocarcinoma of prostate, which is also hypointense on T2WI with diffusion restriction. Prostatic lesions which are hyperintense on T2WI are less frequently encountered. Their differentials include granulomatous prostatitis/abscess, cysts, post-biopsy haemorrhage, and malignancies like prostatic sarcoma (3),(4),(5).

Case Report

Case 1

A 60-year-old male presented to Urology Outpatient Department (OPD) with prostatism for one year; with exacerbation of symptoms with increased frequency and dysuria for the past two weeks. He was a known case of type 2 diabetes mellitus, controlled on oral hypoglycaemics for the past 15 years. He had no other significant medical or family history.

The DRE revealed painful firm lesion in the left side of prostate. PSA was 9 ng/mL. Multiparametric MRI revealed increased volume of prostate with obstructive changes in bladder. BPH nodule was present in TZ at prostatic base, bulging into the base of Urinary Bladder (UB). Left PZ at apex showed another T1WI hypointense, T2WI hyperintense lesion with periprostatic fat stranding. The nodule had shaggy wall with central restricted diffusion. Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) images showed peripheral enhancement and raised periprostatic vascularity (Table/Fig 1). As per the PI-RADS lexicon, a DWI score of 4 was assigned to this lesion but could not assign any T2WI score as the nodule was hyperintense. DWI being the chief determinant of PI-RADS score for PZ lesions, the overall PI-RADS score of the lesion was also 4; fallaciously implying high likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer. However, in view of central diffusion restriction and peripheral enhancement, a diagnosis of a prostatic abscess was established. This was confirmed by purulent material obtained on Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided aspiration; with growth of Staphylococcus aureus on pus culture. Patient was subsequently managed with intravenous Vancomycin 1 g twice daily for five days. The patient improved clinically, urine culture was sterile, and serial PSA levels showed a declining trend. The patient was advised conservative management for BPH at time of discharge.

Case 2

A 40-year-old male patient presented with mild to moderate intensity dull aching pain in the left flank for three months. The pain was partially relieved with analgesics; and was not aggravated with movement or respiration. DRE revealed soft prostatic lesion with PSA of 4 ng/mL. Sonography revealed a cystic lesion in the left side of prostate. The right kidney and urinary bladder appeared normal. However, left kidney was not visualised in normal or ectopic locations. MRI revealed a T2WI hyperintense serpiginous lesion in left PZ extending into periurethral region, with no restricted diffusion or enhancement. The lesion was separate but adjacent to left seminal vesicle (Table/Fig 2).

Differentials of ejaculatory duct cyst and ectopic ureterocele were established. However, ejaculatory duct was seen separately and appeared normal. Also, the lesion was seen following the expected course of left ureter till L2 level; but the left kidney was not visualised at its cranial extent indicating it was an ectopic ureterocele with left renal agenesis. The patient underwent left ureterectomy and ureterocele excision. No identifiable renal tissue was found on histopathological examination of the proximal blind end of excised left ureter. Patient had an uneventful postoperative course; and remained asymptomatic on six-month follow-up after surgery.

Case 3

A 35-year-old male presented to Urology OPD with bladder outlet obstruction and haematochezia for two months. DRE revealed a firm to hard prostatic mass. Serum PSA was 4 ng/mL. Clinical suspicion of cancer prostate was considered. Multiparametric MRI revealed a large mass arising from prostate which was heterogeneously hyperintense on T2WI with intralesional haemorrhage. It showed restricted diffusion with heterogenous postcontrast enhancement. There was extracapsular extension of the mass with involvement of bilateral seminal vesicles, neurovascular bundles, urinary bladder, lateral pelvic wall, anterior wall of rectum, with tumour thrombus in right internal iliac vein. Multiple focal lesions were present in pelvic bones and vertebrae. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen was done for staging purposes. It additionally revealed pulmonary and hepatic metastases; mediastinal, left supraclavicular and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy; ascites and omental smudging; with subtle lytic osseous lesions (Table/Fig 3).

Prostatic adenocarcinomas are usually seen in the geriatric age-group, are classically T2W hypointense with sclerotic bone metastases; whereas this mass had high T2W signal with lytic bone metastases. Therefore, rarer malignancies such as prostatic sarcoma, desmoplastic round cell tumour and prostatic lymphoma were the considered differentials. TRUS-guided biopsy confirmed that it was a prostatic stromal sarcoma with neuroectodermal differentiation. The patient was initiated on chemotherapy but did not respond and expired shortly thereafter.

Discussion

Current state-of-the-art multiparametric MRI has dramatically improved the detection and characterisation of prostatic lesions. Adenocarcinoma is the most common malignancy of prostate but patients may have other benign or malignant lesions which can be diagnosed with MRI (4).

The first case in the present series was a patient with prostatic abscess in left PZ with BPH nodule. Prostatic abscesses develop as a complication of prostatitis caused by Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus or Gonococcus, mainly seen in patients with immunocompromised status or bladder outlet obstruction (6). Generally the presenting features are perineal pain with dysuria (6). MRI features of prostatic abscess in the present case was hyperintensity on T2WI with peripheral enhancement and central restricted diffusion which was similar to cases reported by Singh P et al. In both the cases reported by them, one a 22-year-old male with multiple small PZ lesions, and another a diabetic 62-year-old male patient with a single lesion in central gland of left midzone, the prostatic abscesses appeared hyperintense on T2WI with central diffusion restriction and peripheral postcontrast enhancement (6). Another study also reported a case of a 73-year-old diabetic patient with dysuria who had multiple prostatic abscesses. His MRI revealed prostatomegaly with heterogenous glandular signal. The prostatic abscesses appeared as multiple round cystic lesions on T2W sequence, with ring enhancement on postcontrast T1W sequences (7). Additionally, Ren J et al. reported presence of air foci in prostatic abscesses; however, this was not present in our case (3). The patient underwent pus drainage with intravenous antibiotics with clinical improvement; no follow up imaging was warranted.

Second case was an adult male with left flank pain and MRI revealed dilated tortuous left ureter with an ectopic ureterocele and left renal agenesis. Renal agenesis results from failure of induction of metanephric blastema by ureteral bud. The dilated tubular structure seen at MRI in our case is the blind ending ureteral remnant which has an ectopic insertion with an ectopic ureterocele. These structures are thought to arise either from supernumerary ureteric buds or from lack of normal connection between the ureteric bud with metanephrogenic cap (8). Findings in our case were similar to other case reports by Mohseni MG et al., and Ahmed A et al., though their patients did not undergo MRI for assessment and their patients had orthotopic ureteroceles (8),(9). In the former case, a 32-year-old male patient with left lower quadrant pain was found to have left renal agenesis with a solid, cystic non enhancing retrovesical mass on CT. Surgery confirmed cranial blind ending left ureter and revealed retrovesical mass to be a pyoureterocele (8). In the latter case, a 30-year-old male with left flank pain and recurrent urinary tract infection, was found to have absent left kidney, left megaureter with proximal blind end and distal ureterocele on CT (9). Another case reported by Bhayana A and Jain S, had similar features, albeit on the right side. The 20-year-old male patient had right ectopic ureterocele appearing as T2 hyperintense lesion opening into the prostatic urethra, with proximal blind end and ipsilateral renal agenesis (10).

Third case was that of a malignant prostatic stromal sarcoma with neuroectodermal differentiation. Prostatic sarcoma is a rare entity accounting for 0.1-0.2% of all primary prostatic neoplasms, and stromal sarcoma is even rarer. Rhabdomyosarcomas occur primarily in children and adolescents (11),(12),(13), whereas leiomyosarcomas occur in older men (14),(15). MRI features of prostatic sarcoma have been less commonly described due to its rare occurrence. It presents as large infiltrative mass in elderly patients, which is hypointense on T1W, heterogeneously hyperintense on T2WI, with heterogenous postcontrast enhancement due to necrosis (4),(13). These masses can be differentiated from adenocarcinoma on the basis of normal PSA level, mass being more infiltrative and hyperintense on T2WI with osteolytic bony metastasis and distant metastasis to lung and liver (13). These radiological features were consistent with our case (13). Tamada T et al. also reported a similar case of prostatic stromal sarcoma in a 26-year-old man. The tumour appeared as a multinodular mass with hyperintense T2W signal, diffusion restriction and heterogenous enhancement. Their patient also had haematogenous dissemination of malignancy with bone, lung and liver metastases. The patient had a rapid downhill course and expired seven months after admission (16). Neuroectodermal differentiation in prostatic stromal sarcoma is extremely rare. Yamazaki H et al., also described another case of prostatic sarcoma with neuroectodermal differentiation. However, they mainly focused on pathological and immunohistochemical findings; MRI findings were not discussed in detail (17).

Other neoplasm that can mimic prostatic sarcoma is desmoplastic round cell tumour, seen in young males of 15-25 years. It presents as single or multiple intraperitoneal soft tissue masses without an apparent organ of origin. The primary tumour usually arises in the retrovesical space and has necrosis and calcific foci along with extensive peritoneal implants and lymphadenopathy (18),(19). Thus, it was our second differential; however, lung and liver metastases in our case made this less likely. Prostatic lymphoma also presents in older age group; most are Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (20). They are typically homogeneously isointense on T1WI and T2WI, rarely have haemorrhage and necrosis, and show moderate homogeneous postcontrast enhancement (21). Imaging findings in our case was different from these. The radiological differentials of T2 hyperintense prostatic lesions is summarised in (Table/Fig 4).

Conclusion

Although adenocarcinoma is the most commonly evaluated prostatic pathology on multiparametric MRI, radiologists should be aware of other alternative differentials, especially when encountering prostatic lesions which are hyperintense on T2W sequences.

References

1.
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate imaging peporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 Update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Guneyli S, Ward E, Thomas S, Yousuf AN, Trilisky I, Peng Y, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(3):215-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Ren J, Huang X, Wang H, Liu H, Ren F, Zhang Z, et al. Prostatic abscess and seminal vesicle abscess: MRI findings and quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient values. Radiol Infect Dis. 2015;2(1):27-32. [crossref]
4.
Li Y, Mongan J, Behr SC, Sud S, Coakley FV, Simko J, et al. Beyond prostate adenocarcinoma: Expanding the differential diagnosis in prostate pathologic conditions. Radiographics. 2016;36(4):1055-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Curran S, Akin O, Agildere AM, Zhang J, Hricak H, Rademaker J. Endorectal MRI of prostatic and periprostatic cystic lesions and their mimics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1373-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Singh P, Yadav MK, Singh SK, Lal A, Khandelwal N. Case series: Diffusion weighted MRI appearance in prostatic abscess. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21(1):46-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Samara OA, Farah WM, Tarabieh OM, Murshidi MM. Prostatic abscess MRI findings: Case Report. J Med Journal. 2013;47(3):266-72. [crossref]
8.
Mohseni MG, Hosseini SR, Salavati A, Dadgari S. Ureterocele associated with renal agenesia presented as a pelvic mass in an adult. Iran J Radiol. 2013;10:45-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ahmed A. Ipsilateral renal agenesis with megaureter, blind end proximal ureter and ureterocele in an adult. Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29:150-53.
10.
Bhayana A, Jain S. Renal agenesis, blind ending ureteral remnant and ectopic ureterocele. Astrocyte. 2018;4:262-64. [crossref]
11.
Tetu B, Srigley JR, Bostwick DG. Soft tissue tumours. In: Bostwick DG (ed). Pathology of the prostate. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990, p. 117.
12.
Maurer HM, Beltangady M, Gehan EA, Crist W, Hammond D, Hays DM, et al. The intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-I. A final report. Cancer. 1988;61(2):209-20. 3.0.CO;2-L>[crossref]
13.
Andreou A, Whitten C, MacVicar D, Fisher C, Sohaib A. Imaging appearance of sarcomas of the prostate. Cancer Imaging. 2013;13(2):228-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Scmidt JD, Welch MJ. Sarcoma of the prostate. Cancer 1976;37:1908-12. 3.0.CO;2-6>[crossref]
15.
Cheville JC, Dundore PA, Nascimento AG, Meneses M, Kleer E, Farrow GM, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the prostate. Report of 23 cases. Cancer. 1995;76(8):1422-27. 3.0.CO;2-L>[crossref]
16.
Tamada T, Sone T, Miyaji Y, Kozuka Y, Ito K. MRI appearance of prostatic stromal sarcoma in a young adult. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(4):519-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Yamazaki H, Ohyama T, Tsuboi T, Taoka Y, Kohguchi D, Iguchi H, Ao T. Prostatic stromal sarcoma with neuroectodermal differentiation. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:173. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Morani AC, Bathala TK, Surabhi VR, Yedururi S, Jensen CT, Huh WW, et al. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor: Imaging pattern of disease at presentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(3):W45-W54. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Kis B, O'Regan KN, Agoston A, Javery O, Jagannathan J, Ramaiya NH. Imaging of desmoplastic small round cell tumour in adults. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1010):187-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Sarris A, Dimopoulos M, Pugh W, Cabanillas F. Primary lymphoma of the prostate: Good outcome with doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy. J Urol. 1995;153(6):1852-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67330-0. PMID: 7752334. [crossref]
21.
Feng ZY, Min XD, Wang L, Li BS, Ke Z, Zhang PP, et al. MRI feature analysis of uncommon prostatic malignant tumors. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(3):313-15. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55644.16838

Date of Submission: Feb 12, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 03, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 04, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 18, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 02, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 10, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com