Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 21568

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : VD01 - VD02 Full Version

Salmonella Sepsis in a Preterm Neonate- A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58080.16919
Rakesh Kumar, Sanober Wasim, Girish Gupta, Suraj Singh

1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Professor, Department of Neonatology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 4. Fellow, Department of Neonatology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rakesh Kumar,
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: drrakesh99@yahoo.com

Abstract

Sepsis in neonates may rarely be caused by Salmonella typhi, clinical features of which may remain undifferentiated from other causes of sepsis. The mode of transmission can be vertical or horizontal. This case report describes a 30-day-old female baby, born at 28 weeks of gestation, who presented with features suggestive of sepsis, and there was a growth of Salmonella typhi in the blood culture. The neonate showed evident clinical improvements after 48 hours of antibiotics. The neonate was discharged after three weeks without any immediate adverse effect. The case emphasises the consideration of salmonella sepsis and the possible source of infection in neonates.

Keywords

Blood culture, Blood stream infection, Neonatal sepis, Salmonellosis, Salmonella typhi

Case Report

A 30-days-old female neonate was admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with breathing difficulty, decreased activiity and poor feeding for the preceding two days. The baby was born to 28 years old primigravida mother, after 7 years of marriage and with the treatment of infertility. She was delivered by lower segment caesarean section for sudden labour pains and assessed to have a gestational age of 28 weeks with a birth weight of 990 grams. The neonate cried immediately after birth but as she developed distress was admitted to NICU. She had received surfactant and was ventilated for 5 days and was finally discharged after 20 days in stable condition. She was given mixed feeding of her mother’s milk and formula at home.

On admission to NICU, the baby appeared dull, activities were decreased. Temperature, heart rate, capillary refill time, blood pressure and respiratory rate were normal while SpO2 was 86% on room air and needed blow-by oxygen to maintain saturation of more than 90%. She weighed 1200 grams at the time of admission. A provisional diagnosis of late-onset neonatal sepsis was made. The neonate was started on intravenous fluids and antibiotics ampicillin and gentamycin. An investigative assessment of the baby is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Packed red blood cells (10 mL/kg) were transfused on the second day of admission. On the third day of admission, the baby showed improved activity, oxygen requirement decreased and oxygen was weaned. Orogastric feeding was started on day 3 of admission and amount gradually increased, the neonate was on full feeds on day 10 of admission. The blood culture showed growth of Salmonella typhi which was sensitive to ampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ceftriaxone, cefixime, chloramphenicol, and azithromycin. Antibiotics were changed to cefotaxime 150 mg/kg/day, considering the CSF report. Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) culture showed no growth.

The neonate showed consistent clinical improvement and was discharged after three weeks of antibiotics in a stable condition. Weight at the time of discharge was 1255 grams and the neurosonogram was reported to be normal. The baby was further followed-up in the Outpatient Department after 1 week and was gaining weight adequately approximately 20 gm/kg/day, with no neurological deficit. The neonate was lost to follow-up after the first visit.

The mother was evaluated as a potential source of infection with blood culture, widal test, stool, and urine cultures but her tests were normal with no evidence of typhoid fever. Also, there was no history of fever in any of the family members in the preceding two weeks. Contaminated water and improper preparation of the formula feeds were so suspected to be the cause of salmonella infection. There was no cross-infection in the NICU post admission of the neonate. Family members were advised of the typhoid vaccine at the time of discharge.

Discussion

Enteric fever is a febrile illness caused by infection of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi or serotype paratyphi A, B, or C through food or water contaminated with human feces. A large proportion of the global burden is concentrated in South Asia with a high incidence in India. A recent study estimated the national incidence of typhoid fever to be 360 cases per 100,000 person-years with substantial heterogeneity among the country (1). It has been seen that the incidence of culture-confirmed typhoid is more in young children (2).

Salmonella typhi infection may be benign and self-limited but in a small number of cases result in bacteremia and invasive infection. Invasive infection occurs because of distorted immunity of the local enteric system and is usually seen in extremes of ages and depressed immune systems. This form is more common in infants less than two years of age and more so in neonates (3),(4).

Sepsis caused by Salmonella typhi in neonates although rare but is a life-threatening illness. The trend of culture positive typhoid fever shows that the incidence of culture positive typhoid fever is decreasing. Literature on this subject is being increasingly reported from endemic areas as evident from multiple reports in recent times (5),(6). Because of the lack of specific clinical features as seen in adults and paediatric populations, salmonella sepsis remains an underdiagnosed condition in neonates. Salmonella typhi infection in the paediatric population has been studied in detail by the majority of literature but data on infants is rare and presentation in the neonatal population is still rarer (7). Clinicians have reported very few cases in this population as the clinical feature remain indistinguishable from other causes of sepsis (8),(9). The rarity of salmonella sepsis in the newborn can be explained by the fact that neonates are usually not exposed to food items that may be contaminated with Salmonella typhi. The clinical pictures found in adults and older children are not seen in neonates because of the limited cytokine release from the macrophages in Peyer’s patches. The classical “rose spots” are usually not seen in neonates (8).

In a case reported by Juyal D et al., the neonate presented with fever, respiratory distress, and refusal to feed (10). While Sharma D et al., reported a neonate who presented with decreased activity and refusal to feed (11). Kankananarachchi I et al., reported a case of salmonella sepsis who presented at age 38 of life with fever and convulsion (12). The index case showed respiratory distress, decreased activity, and refusal of feeds. These constellation of symptoms are common presenting features of late-onset neonatal sepsis and one should consider salmonella as one of the potential causes in endemic regions.

The route of infection may be vertical from the mother or horizontal from a carrier or environment (13). From an infected mother salmonella can be transmitted via placenta or from the secretions of the birth canal (14). Though breast milk is usually protective it has also been reported to be a source of salmonella infection (15). Cooke FJ et al., has listed cases of isolation of salmonella in breast milk possibly by contamination by dirty hands. Contaminated milk from an asymptomatic mother may also be a possible cause (15).

In the case reported by Juyal D et al., there was a history of feeding the baby ‘mishri’ water at home. The index neonate was bottle fed (10). Most of the time the source identification remains elusive as documented in several reports. There should be a search for a source of infection that can be aided by sending blood, urine, and stool culture of the mother. The urine, blood, and stool culture of the mother did not show growth of salmonella. In this case, the exact source of infection could not be ascertained but possibly it came from the use of water in the preparation of formula feeds.

Diagnosis of salmonella sepsis usually is made on basis of blood culture growth. Most of the case reports mention the confirmation of diagnosis on the basis of the growth of salmonella in blood culture (10),(11),(12). This neonate also had a growth of Salmonella typhi in blood culture.

The management includes supportive care mainly, prevention of hypothermia, fluids, maintaining electrolytes in the normal range, blood transfusion for anemia, and management of shock with inotropes. Definitive treatment includes broad-spectrum antibiotics usually third-generation cephalosporins. Most of the reports mention that once a sensitive antibiotic is started or substituted there is marked clinical improvement (10),(11),(12),(16). Survival is seen even in the tiniest of neonates as described by Lim CT and Lim JW (17). This neonate also started improving consistently as sensitive antibiotics were started with a good outcome till discharge.

Conclusion

Salmonella typhi sepsis in neonates remains a very rare cause of sepsis neonatorum and most of the time clinical features remain indistinguishable from sepsis due to other causes and the presentation may be varied in each neonate. The growth of Salmonella typhi in blood culture confirms the diagnosis. Salmonella typhi as a cause of neonatal sepsis should be considered in areas where Salmonella typhi infection is common in the paediatric and adult population.

References

1.
Cao Y, Karthikeyan AS, Ramanujam K, Raju R, Krishna S, Kumar D, et al. Geographic pattern of typhoid fever in India: A model-based estimate of cohort and surveillance data. The J Infect Dis. 2021;224 (S5):S475-S83. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Balaji V, Kapil A, Shastri J, Pragasam AK, Gole G, Choudhari S, et al. Longitudinal typhoid fever trends in India from 2000 to 2015. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99(3-Suppl):34-40. Doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0139. Epub 2018 Jul 24. PMID: 30047367; PMCID: PMC6128365. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Furyk JS, Swann O, Molyneux E. Systematic review: Neonatal meningitis in the developing world. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(6):672-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Chen HM, Wang Y, Su LH, Chiu CH. Nontyphoid salmonella infection: Microbiology, clinical features, and antimicrobial therapy. Pediatr Neonatol. 2013;54(3):147-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Walia M, Gaind R, Paul P, Mehta R, Aggarwal P, Kalaivani M. Age-related clinical and microbiological characteristics of enteric fever in India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100(10):942-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kanungo S, Dutta S, Sur D. Epidemiology of typhoid and paratyphoid fever in India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2(6):454-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Wain J, Hendriksen RS, Mikoleit ML, Keddy KH , Ochiai RL. Typhoid fever. Lancet. 2015;385(9973):1136-45. [crossref]
8.
Khatami A, Khan F, Macartney KK. Enteric fever in children in western Sydney, Australia, 2003-2015. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(12):1124-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ahmad Hatib NA, Chong CY, Thoon KC, Tee NW, Krishnamoorthy SS, Tan NW. Enteric fever in a tertiary paediatric hospital: A retrospective six-year review. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2016;45(7):297-302. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Juyal D, Rathaur VK, Pal S, Sharma N. Salmonella enterica serotype paratyphi B-An unusual pathogen in sepsis neonatorum. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;58(2):182-84.
11.
Sharma D, Khan J, Agarwal S. Salmonella typhi as cause of neonatal sepsis: Case report and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(5):732-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kankananarachchi I, Munasinghe TM, Naotunna C, Piyasiri DL, Dammalage Lasanthi, Devasiri IV. A case of Salmonella typhi neonatal meningitis. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health. 2019;48(04):350-52. [crossref]
13.
Reed RP, Klugman KP. Neonatal typhoid fever. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13(9):774-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Carles G, Montoya Y, Seve B, Rakotofananina T, Largeaud M, Mignot V. Typhoid fever and pregnancy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2002;31(5):495-99.
15.
Cooke FJ, Ginwalla S, Hampton MD, Wain J, Ross.Russell R, Lever A, et al. Report of neonatal meningitis due to salmonella enteric serotype agona and review of breast milk associated neonatal Salmonella Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(9):3045-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Rai S, Rai R, Singh DK, Nandwani S. Neonatal salmonella paratyphi B sepsis: A case report. Journal of Neonatology. 2020;34(4):241-42. [crossref]
17.
Lim CT, Lim JW. Salmonella enteritidis septicaemia and meningitis in an extremely preterm and extremely low birthweight infant. J Diagn Case Rep. 2020;1(1):01-02. [crossref]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58080.16919

Date of Submission: Jun 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 01, 2022 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com