Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 21965

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : ZE07 - ZE11 Full Version

Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Natural Root Canal Irrigants- A Literature Review


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58307.16879
Seema Deshmukh, Indira Mysore Devraj, Arundhati Banerjee

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 3. Post Graduate Student, Department of Pediatric and& Preventive Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mysore Devraj Indira,
JSS Medical Instituions Campus, Sri Shivarathreeswara Nagar, Bannimantap, Mysore-570015, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drindiramd@gmail.com

Abstract

An efficient chemomechanical preparation is essential for the success of endodontic treatment. There are various methods of instrumentation and irrigation, the canals are instrumented with either hand files or rotary. Chemical agents are used for irrigation during instrumentation to completely sterilise the canals. A lot of natural products are also used as irrigating agents as they have a lot of antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and other biological properties. Several commonly used irrigants come with certain disadvantages. Certain chemicals like sodium hypoclorite can be toxic and weakens the dentine microstructure, but by using natural agents these side effects can be prevented. Less toxic and more biocompatible products are being increasingly used such as apple vinegar, citrus fruits, miswak, tulsi, chitosan, neem, turmeric, triphala etc. The natural preparations are derived from roots, seeds, leaves of plants preparations or shells of animals. This narrative review is aimed at highlighting various natural agents which can be considered as a potential adjunct for endodontic treatment.

Keywords

Antioxidants, Chemical debridement, Dentin hardness, Pulp tissue

A strong association between the basic science of microbiology and the clinical science of successful endodontic practice has been identified and endorsed in literature (1). In order to produce a sterile environment and a hermetic seal, root canal treatment relies on the elimination of infected pulpal tissues, bacteria, and their toxins. Chemomechanical preparation involves the utilisation of a chemical solution in conjunction with mechanical instrumentation to clean the root canal system (2). The elimination of pulp remnants, microbial toxins and germs accomplished by chemomechanical debridement, is necessary for the success of root canal therapy (3). Irrigation and instrumentation are used to achieve acceptable root canal cleaning (4). During the instrumentation process, huge amounts of dentin debris combine with vital and necrotic pulp tissue remains, forming a smear layer with microorganisms and microbial toxins adhering to the root canal wall (4). In the year 1975, McComb and Smith were the first to report the formation of a smear layer on instrumented root canals. According to the researchers this layer is made up of dentin fragments, bacteria, odontoblastic processes and necrotic pulp tissues (5).

Despite the proliferation of irrigants and irrigation techniques, the ever-difficult and problematic smear layer elimination needs to be looked upon. The smear layer’s effect, its clinical implications of bacterial contamination is a highly debated subject among scientists who are continually in disagreement in Endodontics (6). There is evidence in the literature that microorganisms and their metabolites present in the smear layer contribute to the endodontic treatment's ultimate outcome, either directly or indirectly. Persistent infections in these canal spaces are the main cause of many treatment failures. The obturated root canal system's apical and coronal closure is greatly improved by removing the smear layer (6). Various methods like hand filing, rotary with EDTA, sodium hypochlorite and saline irrigation for removing intraradicular smears have been suggested (6). Regardless of instrumentation, 35% or more of the root canal surfaces remain uninstrumented (6). As a result, irrigation is an important aspect of root canal debridement since it enables cleaning beyond what root canal instrumentation alone can provide. Irrigants can help eliminate the smear layer from the root wall in addition to disinfecting it (7).

EDTA and sodium hypochlorite are the most commonly utilised irrigants for debridement and removal of the smear layer. Despite their tissue toxicity and dentine erosive effects, they serve as a standard reference. Erosion can sometimes be severe enough to expose the calcospherites' spherical surface (1). As a result, a variety of novel root canal irrigants have been explored and tested for their capacity to effectively debride and remove the smear layer (1). Ideally irrigant should have antimicrobial activity, can mechanically flush out debris from the canal, should be non toxic and biocompatible, should dissolve necrotic and vital pulp tissues, serve as lubricant, remove smear layer and have low surface tension to enable better penetration into dentin tubules (8).

Irrigation solutions are classified according to their common use (7).

A) Instrumentation auxiliary chemicals (these are substances that are utilised during instrumentation but do not require optimal physical properties, only chemical properties) like Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Chlorhexidine (CHX), etc.

B) Irrigating chemicals (Irrigating substances have appropriate physical features, such as a lower tension surface and reduced viscosity, and are used during irrigation aspiration procedures) such as Saline, Distilled Water, NaOCl, Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent (MTAD) etc (7).

Need for Newer Root Canal Irrigants

In light of the safety concern, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and no or minimal potential side effects, researchers are trying to rekindle their search for herbal alternatives (1). Due to the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immune-modulatory, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, and radical scavenging activity of the active ingredients, natural compounds such as herbal extracts are gaining great significance as endodontic irrigants (8). Natural herbal medicines are being evaluated and used frequently as part of dental treatment methods due to their simplicity of availability, cost-effectiveness, and biocompatibility (6). Researchers have been looking for safer and more patient-friendly herbal alternatives due to the progressive development in antibiotic-resistant strains, the side effects produced by the introduction of synthetic medications, and the risks linked with irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite (6).

NATURAL ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS

Citrus Aurantifolia

Water, 6-8% citric acid, 2% potassium citrate, and other components make up 88% of C. aurantifolia. Citric acid is a basic ingredient in C. aurantifolia, thus researchers looked into it for a possible role in removing the endodontic smear layer; nevertheless, the results were mixed. Citric acid generally removes smear layer when used in higher concentration and for longer duration. But again long duration might bring about etching of the root canal dentine (9). Citric acid, a weak organic acid, found in citrus fruits has been used on periodontal disease and instrumentation-affected root surfaces in the past to enhance cementogenesis and speed healing (10). Early investigations found that using 6% citric acid as a final flush in instrumented root canals did not entirely eliminate the smear layer (11). A 1 mol L-1 citric acid solution was just as effective as EDTA at eliminating the smear layer (10).

Furthermore, the role of natural fruit juices, such as Citrus aurantifolia (C. aurantifolia), on exposed root dentin surfaces in eliciting dentinal hypersensitivity has been proven, and it is associated to the elimination of the existing smear layer on the exposed dentin (9). C. aurantifolia was quite effective at removing the smear layer, as seen by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the root canal walls, which revealed cleaner canal walls in all three thirds (11), but the smear layer could not be completely removed from the apical 3rd with sodium hypochlorite solution tested (4).

Apple Vinegar

Apple vinegar has been recommended as an irrigant in the chemomechanical process because of its promising outcomes that are similar to EDTA (3). Although it has a high quantity of maleic acid, it has a good biocompatibility (4). Apple vinegar is a powerful chelating agent that also has a bactericidal impact on bacteria. On investigating the performance of apple vinegar versus 17% EDTA in eliminating smear layer and it was found that apple vinegar was more successful in removing smear layer when used for one minute as a final rinse without changing the calcium level of intraradicular dentin (3). The presence of maleic acid in apple vinegar explains these outcomes (3). Maleic acid is a mild organic acid found in grapes, cherries, watermelons, and in vegetables such as broccoli and carrots. It has smear layer removal characteristics when used as an acid etchant in restorative dentistry (12). The results of a study demonstrated that 7% maleic acid was more effective than 17% EDTA and a diode laser combination in removing smear layer (13).

Castor Detergent+Papain Enzyme

Papain is a debris removing enzyme. It exclusively affects the damaged tissues, as healthy tissues lack the 1-antitrypsine plasmatic antiprotease that prevents proteolysis. Castor oil comes from the seeds of the Ricinus communis plant and is a phytotherapeutic polymer (14). The presence of chelating agent increases the proteolytic activity of papain enzyme in this solution, as Chu CM et al., (2002) discovered that when heavy metal chelating agents are present, papain activity is boosted and activated (15).

The MCP solution (which contains 20% sodium castorate and 4% papain enzyme) is a single solution that removes organic and inorganic waste through chelation and proteolysis. The MCP solution has the capacity to partially remove both. EDTA and NaOCL are unable to cause smear layer removal entirely without causing dentin erosion, but MCP solution was able to partially cause smear layer removal without causing dentin erosion (14).

Orange Oil

The major component of orange oil is d-Limonene (16). Orange peel extract is made up of 88% water, 6–8% citric acid, 2% potassium citrate, and other ingredients. Citric acid is the main ingredient, thus researchers looked into it for a possible role in removing endodontic smear layer; nevertheless, there was mixed outcome. In comparison to the control group, orange peel extract had a lower efficacy in removing smear layers. The lesser efficacy could be due to irrigants not reaching the deeper apical region due to the high surface tension of the oil-based nature of orange peel extract irrigant, or it could be due to irrigants not reaching the required number of acid metabolites for elimination (8).

Green Tea Polyphenol

Catechins (polyphenols) are important ingredients of green tea extract, which have increased action against a wide range of microorganisms and have also been discovered to be a good chelating agent (9) but showed less smear layer removal efficacy, possibly due to the lack of acid metabolites required for removal (16).

Salvadora Persica

Salvadora persica (S. persica) or miswak, is a Salvadoraceae family member that has been used to supply toothbrushes (17). It is also known as the toothbrush tree. Even when used without any other tooth cleaning treatments, S. persica has been scientifically demonstrated to be effective in preventing tooth decay (18).

The 5 mg/mL S. persica solution out performed the 1 mg/mL solution significantly. Furthermore, the 5 mg/mL S. persica solution was just as effective at removing the smear layer from the coronal third of the canal wall as 17% EDTA. The acid component of S. persica (stearic acid), may react with calcium in the dentin and act as a chelating agent, could explain its smear layer removing capacity (17).

Tea Tree Oil

Tea tree oil, also known as Melaleuca alternifolia, is a native Australian plant whose oil has a variety of qualities that make it ideal for use in dentistry. It has antibacterial and antifungal properties. It has a modest solvent activity and hence, has the potential to be used in root canal therapy. Although its high surface tension does not completely remove the smear layer from all the regions of the root canal. Hence, it is better to switch to a non oily tea tree oil extract because a material with a lesser surface tension would be more useful (19).

Turmeric

Turmeric has a wide range of biological effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, and antibacterial properties (20). Curcuma longa (turmeric) aqueous extract, on the other hand, showed good antifungal activity against Candida Albicans (21). Turmeric had diffuse but adequate antibacterial action against E. faecalis in this trial as well (22). Turmeric can also help to reduce smear layer and is a potential root canal irrigant that can be used in conjunction with other irrigating treatments to effectively remove smear layer (21). Turmeric, being a biocompatible substance, might be thought of as a good alternative to the often employed chemical irrigants (20).

Chitosan

Chitosan is a amino-polysaccharide co-polymer of glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine formed by alkaline partial deacetylation of chitin derived from crab and shrimp shells. It is a natural polysaccharide with biocompatibility, bioadhesion, biodegradability, and a-toxicity to human cells, as well as a high chelating property for various metal ions and a low cost, making it a popular alternative to sodium hypochlorite (23). The chelating property of chitosan reported, suggests that it acts on the inorganic portion of the smear layer, allowing it to be removed more easily.Under SEM, 0.2% chitosan was found to be effective in removing the smear layer in all three regions (coronal, middle, and apical) of the root surface (19).

Morinda citrifolia

Morinda Citrifolia Juice (MCJ) offers a wide spectrum of medicinal properties, including antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, and analgesic properties. It has also been discovered to be a herbal irrigant that, when administered at a concentration of 6%, is efficient in removing smear layers. Because it is a biocompatible antioxidant with minimal side effects, the use of MCJ as root canal irrigant could be beneficial. Milder acids in MCJ may be responsible for its stated ability to remove smear layers. The pH of MCJ at 6% concentration is 3.5. With either watering method, MCJ 6 % proved ineffective in removing the smear layer (24).

Terminalia chebula

Terminalia chebula, often known as kadukka, is a medicinal plant. One of the key ingredients in Triphala is Terminalia chebula, which has antiviral and antibacterial properties, and its fruits are high in citric acid, which may help with smear layer removal. It is used to cure oral illnesses because it includes hydrolysable tannins such as gallic acid, chebulic acid, corilagin and chebulagic acid. Tannic acid can be adsorbed to dental hydroxyapatite, which is linked to the surface of bacterial cells, causing protein denaturation and bacterial cell lysis (25).

Triphala

Triphala (TPL) is a classic ayurvedic herbal composition. It is made up of three medicinal plants: Terminalia chebula, Terminalia bellerica and Phyllanthus emblica. Tannins and other phenolic compounds are found in Phyllanthus emblica. It also contains flavanoids and ascorbic acid. The cleaning effect of TPL strongly relates to these acid components (25). No irrigation solution tested could completely remove smear layer from apical thirds (4). Irrigating solutions containing 0.005% TPL are effective (1). Triphala showed enhanced smear layer clearance and moderate apical third erosion (1).

Neem Leaf

With its antioxidant and antibacterial qualities, neem leaf extract has been shown to be effective against Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis, making it a potential root canal irrigation agent (16). It had the highest amount of smear layer removal efficiency compared to all the other groups in the study due to the presence of acid metabolites, flavanoids (16). Nimbin, nimbidin, and nimbidol, which are active ingredients in neem leaf extract, demonstrated significant smear layer removal efficacy. Neem leaf extract has significant antibacterial efficiency against E. faecalis and significant smear layer removal efficacy when compared to 17% EDTA (26). It is discovered that neem leaf extract was effective in removing smear layers. Due to the presence of acid metabolites, flavanoids, neem leaf extract displayed the maximum degree of smear layer removal efficacy in the present investigation (27).

German Chamomile

The analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, antibacterial, and sedative qualities of German chamomile have been used for medical reasons for centuries. Chamomile is beneficial as a mouthwash for treating mild infections and mouth irritations, and it is also found in several toothpastes. G. chamomile preparations, on the other hand, were said to clean the coronal and middle third of the brain better. GCE is a dried flower extract of the Matricaria recutita plant, also known as "German chamomile." This extract possesses antibacterial properties, as well as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Chamazolene, alpha-bisabolol, and acids such aschlorogenic acid, capric acid, caprylic acid, o-coumaric acid, p-coumaric acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, and other components have been discovered through chemical study of GCE (28). With a pH of 7.6, it also contains acids such capric acid, o-coumaric acid, p-coumaric acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, and caprylic acid. Chamomile's cleansing effect could be due to these acid components (28). When used with either continuous or syringe and needle irrigation systems, GCE 6 % proved successful in removing the smear layer. The severe demineralization observed with 17 % EDTA did not occur with GCE 6 % (24).

Tulsi

Eugenol (70%), Oleanolic acid, Aerosol acid, element (11%), caryophyllene, and germacrene are the main constituents of Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi), a plant native to India. The anti-inflammatory, immunological modulatory, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antioxidant, and anticarcinogenic activities of the ingredients of these commonly used herbal irrigants are well-documented. Tulsi’s active components, such as eugenol, ursolic acid, carvacrol, and oleanolic acid, demonstrated comparable antibacterial effectiveness. Eugenol (l-hydroxy2-methoxy-4-allylbenzene), an active ingredient discovered in Ocimum sanctum L., has been found to be responsible for tulsi’s therapeutic properties (26). Tulsi has antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects, according to studies (26),(29).

In comparison to tulsi, NaOCl exhibited the less efficacy, and the difference in smear layer elimination was determined to be highly significant. Tulsi irrigants can be used efficiently as irrigants in primary teeth because they can eliminate the smear layer. This could be attributed to the extracts' active components. In apical slice, almost all of the dentinal tubules were open. Due to the presence of acid metabolites, flavanoids, tulsi leaf extract demonstrated the largest level of smear layer removal efficacy compared to all the other groups in investigation by Sharma K and Dhawan R (27).

Passion Fruit Juice

Antimicrobial activities have been discovered in Passion Fruit Extract (PFE) irrigant. In the coronal and middle thirds of the root, 30% PFE caused less erosion and statistically significant smear layer reduction. Smear layer removal was effective in all three thirds of the root when coupled with 17 % EDTA (30).

Nutmeg

The main constituents of Nutmeg have been found to be terpenes, alpha pinene, beta pinene, trimyristin, myristic acid, neolignan (myrislignan), alkyl benzene derivatives (myristicin, elemicin, safrole, etc.,), and macelignan. NaOCl had less efficacy in comparison with nutmeg and the difference in the smear layer removal was found to be highly significant (31).

Phytic Acid

Phytic acid (IP6, inositol hexakisphosphate) is a primary phosphorus storage form found in bran and plant seeds, and it plays a role in a range of cellular functions. It possesses a lot of negative charges, which makes it a good chelator for multivalent cations like calcium (Ca++), iron and magnesium (32). It also has antiplaque and cariostatic properties. In comparison to EDTA, phytic acid causes smear layer removal and has been shown to be more biocompatible and less cytotoxic. It is discovered that phytic acid was more successful than EDTA at removing the smear layer from NaOCl-treated dentin surfaces and instrumented root canals, with no adverse effects on pulpal cells. The pH of a 1 % phytic acid solution was found to be around 1.2, which could explain why calcium ions were extracted more efficiently (32). Result of various studies (3),(4),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(16),(17),(20),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28),(31),(32) are presented in (Table/Fig 1).

Conclusion

Citrus aurantifolia, apple vinegar, Salvadora persica, nutmeg, tulsi, neem, German chamomile, triphala are mild acidic or contain acid metabolites which can be useful for dissolving smear layer. Many of them for example Morinda citrifolia, green tea, additionally contains antioxidant properties which contributes to better removal of the smear layer. Moreover, the chelating of papain, green tea has also proved to be quite beneficial. Despite the fact that only a few natural products have been proven to be effective. Different combinations and concentrations may improve their efficacy and use for biofriendly smear layer removal. Additional animal models and in-vivo studies are need to be conducted. Natural extracts’ effect on the long-term prognosis of endodontic treatment needs to be explored through further research.

References

1.
Paul J, Prakash V, Mensudar R, Sukumaran VG, Subbiya A, Mitthra S. Evaluation of three root canal irrigants in their ability to remove smear layer with significantly least erosio-ansem analysis. Smear layer removal. Int J Aquat Sci. 2021;12(3):03.
2.
Alharbi A, Aliuddin S, Alharbi TA, Alharbi S, Alanzi AO, Alharbi AA. Herbal endodontic irrigants. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res. 2017;4(4):311-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10052-0133. [crossref]
3.
Abdelghany ME, Kamel WH, Bastawy HA. Efficacy of Apple vinegar as final irrigating solution in removing smear layer using XP-Endo finisher file. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2020:7(1):95-103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2019.7841.1117. [crossref]
4.
Karteek BS, Reddy KS, Prasad SD, Reddy MS, Jain A, Lakshmi C. Evaluation of efficacy of three herbal extracts on smear layer removal during root canal preparation using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study. Int J Dent Sci Innov Res. 2020,3(4):240-53.
5.
Alamoudi RA. The smear layer in endodontic: To keep or remove-an updated overview. Saudi Endod J. 2019;9(2):71-81.
6.
Susan AC, Bharathraj AR, Praveen M, Kumar NSM, Karunakaran JV. Intraradicular smear removal efficacy of triphala as a final rinse solution in curved canals: A scanning electron microscope study. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2019;11:S420-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_55_19. PMID: 31198380. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Vineet AS, Rajesh M, Sonali, Mukesh. A contemporary overview of endodontic irrigants-A review. J Dent App. 2014;1(1):105-15.
8.
Ranjitha GR, Mutha SR, Anithakumari R, Vikram R, Kumar N, Shivekshith AK. Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal efficacy of three herbal irrigants in the apical third of the root canal: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2020;11:61-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_2_20. [crossref]
9.
Chhabra N, Gyanani H, Kamatagi L. Smear layer removal efficacy of combination of herbal extracts in two different ratios either alone or supplemented with sonic agitation: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study. J Conserv Dent. 2015:18(4):374-78. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164035. PMID: 26430300. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, Sbaizero O. Effectiveness of 1 mol L-1 citric acid and 15% EDTA irrigation on smear layer removal. Int Endod J. 2000;33(1):46-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00273.x. PMID: 11307473. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Chhabra N, Gyanani HC, Patel B, Gangaramani S, Desai K. A Novel combination of Herbs as chelating agents: An in vitro SEM evaluation. Orig Res Artic Indian J Conserv Endod. 2016;1(2):47-51.
12.
Ballal NV, Kundabala M, Bhat KS. Evaluation of the efficacy of various concentrations of maleic acid and edta in removal of smear layer- An sem study. Int J Clin Dent. 2010;3(4):225-34.
13.
Hasheminia SM, Birang R, Feizianfard M, Nasouri M. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by two endodontic irrigants and nd:yag laser: A scanning electron microscopic study. ISRN Dent. 2012:2012:01-07. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/620951. PMID: 22844605. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Zakarea NAA, Mohamad TH, Taqa AA, Chumbley S, Al-Juaid S, Balto H. A newly prepared solution for the removal of the smear layer. Int J Dent Sci Res [Internet]. 2014:2(1):19-26.
15.
Chu CM, Awang B, Duduku K, Tie SH. Effect of ionic and non ionic surfactants on papain activity. Borneo Sci. 2002;12:71-77.
16.
Sebatni MA, Kumar AA. Smear layer removal efficacy of herbal extracts used as endodontic irrigants: An in vitro study. J Endod. 2021;29(1):35-38.
17.
Balto H, Ghandourah B, Al-Sulaiman H. The efficacy of Salvadora persica extract in the elimination of the intracanal smear layer: A sem study. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2012;24(2):71-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.01.002. PMID: 23960532. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Salehi P, Danaie SHM. Comparison of the antibacterial effects of persica mouthwash with chlorhexidine on streptococcus mutans in orthodontic patients. J Pharm Sci (US). 2006;14:178-82.
19.
Mallika, Aggarwal N, Gupta P, Abrol A, Abrol N. Evaluation of the effect of different irrigant solutions on the smear layer removal on root canal dentine at coronal middle and apical root sections using SEM study. Int J Curr Res. 2019;11(04):2867-72.
20.
Sulgante S, Ratnakar P, Patil VS, Rairam S. Efficacy of chemical and herbal endodontic irrigants in smear layer removal from root dentin-A comparative in-vitro sem study. Int J Sci Res. 2018;7(6):285-88.
21.
Amalraj A, Pius A, Gopi S, Gopi S. Biological activities of curcuminoids, other biomolecules from turmeric and their derivatives: A review. J Trad Comp Med. 2017;7(2):205-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.05.005. PMID: 28417091. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Analysis of antibacterial activity of curcumin against Enterococcus faecalis. Int J Curr Res. 2011;3(9):37-41
23.
Badr M, Elhafez E. Comparison of antibacterial effect and smear layer removal of herbal versus traditional irrigants- An in vitro study. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66(3):1863-71. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2020.28284.1104. [crossref]
24.
Saha S, Singh R, Bhardwaj A, Vijaywargiya P, Billore J, Saxena D. Efficacy of smear layer removal by two Ayurvedic herbal irrigants, using continuous vs. syringe and needle irrigation. J Endod. 2019;31(1):72-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_28_18. [crossref]
25.
Prabhakar J, Senthilkumar M, Priya MS, Mahalakshmi K, Sehgal PK, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (triphala and green tea polyphenols), mtad, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: An in vitro study. J Endod [Internet]. 2010;36(1):83-86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.040. PMID: 20003940. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Kumar A, Sarthaj AS, Antony SM. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial and layer removal efficacy of two different herbal irrigants - An in vitro study. Int Health Res J. 2018;1(11):350-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.26440/IHRJ/01_11/145. [crossref]
27.
Sharma K, Dhawan R. Efficacy of herbal extracts in removal of smear layer: An in-vitro study Int. J. Sci. Res. 2021(2277):61-63.
28.
Sowjanyaa J, Thomas T, Chandana CS. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of smear layer removal by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, Triphala, and German chamomile as irrigants- A scanning electron microscopy study. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2017;7(3):267-71.
29.
Ghonmode WN, Balsaraf OD, Tambe VH, Saujanya KP, Patil AK, Kakde DD. Comparison of the antibacterial effciency of neem leaf extracts, grape seed extracts and 3% sodium hypochlorite against E. faecalis - An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:61-66.
30.
Vinothini DV. Effect of passion fruit juice in removal of smear layer in root canal of ex vivo human teeth: A scanning electron microscopic study. Ann SBV. 2018;7(1):79-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10085-7196. [crossref]
31.
Mali S, Singla S. Tyagi P, Sharma A, Talreja N, Gautam A. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different herbal irrigants on the removal of smear layer of primary teeth: A SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020:38:374-80.
32.
Jagzap JB, Patil SS, Gade VJ, Chandhok DJ, Upagade MA, Thakur DA. Effectiveness of three different irrigants- 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, Q-MIX, and phytic acid in smear layer removal: A comparative scanning electron microscope study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8:459-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_524_17. PMID: 29042735. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58307.16879

Date of Submission: Jun 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 24, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 26, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 10, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 02, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 24, 2022 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com