Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 182124

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : VC01 - VC05 Full Version

Sleep Quality, Daytime Sleepiness and Mental Health in Undergraduate Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60633.17524
Saurav Kumar, Abhishek Samal, Suyash Dwivedi

1. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, G.S. Medical College and Hospital, Pilkhuwa, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, G.S. Medical College and Hospital, Pilkhuwa, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Rama Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pilkhuwa, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Abhishek Samal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, G.S. Medical College and Hospital, Pilkhuwa, Hapur-245304, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dr.abhisheksamal@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep deprivation is a growing problem, especially among medical students who must meet high academic standards, as well as, their parent’s expectations. Since poor sleep quality and daytime sleepiness have important consequences in the mental health of medical undergraduate students, the management of these problems would begin with and be guided by assessment of these sleep-related and mental health parameters.

Aim: To evaluate the sleep quality and effects of sleep deprivation on the psychological well-being and mental health of undergraduate medical students.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted by Department of Psychiatry, G.S. Medical College and Hospital, Pilkhuwa, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India, on undergraduate students, for a period of a month in May 2022. Four hundred medical undergraduate students from 1st, 2nd, 3rd part 1 and 3rd part 2 Bachelor in Medicine and Bachelor in Surgery (MBBS) years, who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled in the present study after their informed consent was taken. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (EPSS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), and Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) were used to assess the participants. Sleep quality and sleepiness were correlated with anxiety depression, stress, and subjective general well-being using Spearman’s coefficient with significance at 0.05 and 0.001 levels.

Results: The study participants were in the age group of 17-24 years and majority of the students (n=130, 32.5%) were 20-year-old. Females accounted for near half of the study participants (n=190, 47.5%). Most of the students in the participant group had poor sleep quality with a mean of 6.75±1.811 and issues of daytime sleepiness (10.68±3.481). The DASS-21 revealed severe anxiety (15.5±2.473) and moderate stress (22.89±3.396) levels. Significant positive correlation was seen between the anxiety (r=0.110; p-value <0.05) and stress (r=0.452; p-value <0.01) index with EPSS. A significant positive correlation was found between anxiety (r=0.118, p-value <0.05), stress (r=0.410; p-value <0.01) and psychological well-being (r=0.119; p-value <0.01) and PSQI score.

Conclusion: The study revealed that, many undergraduate medical students in different semesters slept insufficiently and struggled with daytime tiredness. Among the students, higher stress and anxiety levels, along with a low level of subjective psychological well-being were discovered. Additionally, the study revealed higher levels of anxiety and stress in medical undergraduates, who had poorer sleep quality and excessive daytime sleepiness. Also, students with poor quality of sleep had lower psychological general well-being.

Keywords

Anxiety, Depression, Pittsburgh sleep quality index, Psychological

A physiological function that is vital to life is sleep. Its quality is closely related to both physical and mental health as well as other well-being indicators. A person’s lifetime risk of stress, anxiety, depression, and other mental disorders may be increased if they report poor sleep quality and other sleep-related disruptions (1).

There are broadly two stages of sleep (2): Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep and Non Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep. Throughout a sleep cycle, which lasts between 90 and 110 minutes, REM and NREM sleep alternate in cycles. Adults often experience four to six cycles each night. People are readily aroused during REM sleep because it resembles an awake state. This is the phase where dreams typically take place. Contrarily, NREM sleep is thought to be the deepest period of sleep. Both heart rate and blood pressure sharply decrease during this stage. NREM sleep is divided into four stages. There is little to no eye movement. NREM sleep stages 1 and 2 are light sleep stages. Stages 3 and 4 of profound sleep are characterised by decreased functioning and brain waves. NREM stages 3 and 4 are essential for the recovery of bodily functions. The development of stronger muscles and bones, the bolstering of the immune system, and the regeneration of new tissue are a few examples of these rejuvenating processes (3),(4).

About 75-80% of human sleep is NREM sleep. Inadequate NREM can produce detrimental impacts on emotional health, which can then result in the risk of suffering from and emergence of psychiatric disorders (5). The quantity of sleep is also crucial and positively correlates with mental and motor acuity. The schedule of classes, especially early morning classes and studying till late night can cause sleep deprivation which affects cognitive performance. It includes the ability to think creatively and make flexible decisions. Daytime somnolence and its inevitable results are also one of the main results of the sleep loss (6).

Students who get too little sleep tend to experience difficulty in sleeping more frequently. According to research by Pace-Schott E et al., over the past 30 years, university students’ average sleep duration has significantly dropped (7). This study shows how much such sleep loss affects the body’s systems and organs. Lack of sleep is a widespread issue in society and can have detrimental effects on one’s physical and psychological well-being. Young medical students in their early years struggle to get enough sleep since they stay up late to study for exams in medical school and then spend a lot of time in the hospital. Students’ stress levels are rising which in turn gives rise to various mental health issues. A recent Indian study examining the sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and the various factors affecting sleep habits of medical undergraduates, interns and postgraduates in a medical institute found nearly 30% of the study sample having abnormal sleep quality and excessive sleepiness in daytime (8). One section of the general population that appears to be particularly susceptible to poor sleep is medical students, possibly as a result of their prolonged and intense study schedules. The academic demands of medical school can lead to severe stress. Studies have supported the idea that, the quality of sleep is crucial for both physical and mental health, including an adequate level of neuropsychological functioning (9),(10),(11).

The human body needs sleep to function at its best. Important biological functions and mental functions can suffer greatly when sleep is lacking. Unfortunately, lack of sleep is becoming a more widespread problem in modern culture, especially among medical students who must meet high academic standards as well as their parents’ expectations. Now-a-days, sleep deprivation is the main contributor to psychiatric disorders, especially among young medical students.

A preliminary assessment of burden of sleep-related problems and their mental health repercussions in medical undergraduate students would guide their management. A study in India assessed the sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in medical undergraduate students (8). The present study was conducted in a recently established medical college and also added a novel variable- an assessment of mental health parameters. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sleep quality and effects of sleep deprivation on the psychological well-being and mental health of the undergraduate medical students. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of sleep and daytime sleepiness in undergraduate medical students and the secondary objective of the study was to find a correlation between sleep quality and daytime sleepiness with psychological well-being, and sleep quality and daytime sleepiness with mental health parameters. Further, the study compared students reporting higher levels of anxiety, stress, and depression with those who had lower levels of these mental health parameters to determine if the difference between them was significant or not. The present study hypothesised that, many medical undergraduates would have impaired sleep and ensuing daytime sleepiness, and that these disturbances would affect their psychological well-being and mental health.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted by the Department of Psychiatry, G.S Medical College, a tertiary care Medical College and Hospital in a suburban area of western Uttar Pradesh, India, for a period of one month in May 2022 with purposive sampling. The study sample included the existing students in the college. Before beginning the study, permission from the Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained (vide letter no. GSMCH/2022/IEC/15 dated 28.04.2022).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The study included 400 medical students from a total of 416 medical undergraduate students from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd part 1 and 3rd part 2 MBBS years; students appearing in exams shortly were not included. Exclusion criterion was students who were undergoing treatment for a previously diagnosed major mental or physical disorder/disease. Of the 16 excluded students, 12 had submitted incomplete forms and four were excluded as they had not met the inclusion criterion.

Study Procedure

All subjects provided their written informed consent.The nature of the study and the level of involvement in terms of sharing the details, were fully disclosed to each participant in the study.

A semi-structured datasheet was made by the authors to collect the socio-demographic details of the participants. This included various details such as age, gender, MBBS year and whether they had past or family history of psychiatric illnesses.

The following scales were used to evaluate daytime sleepiness, quality of the sleep, the mental health parameters and are freely available for use:

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (EPSS) (12): It was used for assessing daytime sleepiness due to deprivation of sleep. The questionnaire asks the subject to rate his or her probability of falling asleep on a scale of increasing probability from 0-3 for eight different situations that most people engage in during their daily lives. Higher scores imply more sleepiness, with scores of 0-5 suggestive of lower normal daytime sleepiness; 6-10 of higher normal; 11-12 of mild excessive; 13-15 of moderate excessive and 16-24 of severe excessive daytime sleepiness.

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (13): It is a self-reporting questionnaire to assess the quality of sleep over a period of one month. It has 19 items in 7 components which are measured on a 0-3 interval such that adding up the seven component scores gives the global score that ranges from 0-21. The global PSQI score is inversely related to the sleep quality, and scores above 5 signify significant disturbances in sleep.

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) (14): It is a self-reporting inventory consisting of 21 items to assess the emotional state of the individual over a period of one week. It has three sub-scales of anxiety, depression and stress, with each subscale having seven items. The cut-off scores for the subscales are below 10 for depression, below 8 for anxiety and below 15 for stress. The severity of the subscales are further qualified as being mild, moderate, severe and extreme.

Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) (15): It is a 22-item self-administered standardised measure of subjective psychological well-being. The individual items are rated on a 6-point scale with domains of well-being including emotional states such as anxiety and depression, positive well-being, general health, vitality and self-control.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22.0, was used for data entry and statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used for socio-demographic and clinical variables. The frequencies of the categorical variables in socio-demographic characteristics were calculated, whereas for age and the clinical parameters of EPSS, PSQI, DASS-21 and PGWBI, the mean and standard deviation were calculated. Comparisons between the groups of the Stress- and Depression- subscales of DASS-21 were done using Independent t-test. Comparison in the anxiety subscale of DASS-21 was not done as there was no student in the no-anxiety group. Non parametric correlations between the clinical parameters were done using Spearman’s rho with 2-tailed significance at 0.05 and 0.001 levels.

Results

A total number of 400 students were enrolled in the present research. The socio-demographic variables are in (Table/Fig 1). The study participants were in the age group of 17-24 years and majority of the students (n=130, 32.5%) were 20-year-old. Females accounted for near half of the study participants (n=190, 47.5%). Students from all the MBBS years were almost equally represented in the study. While none of the students had a past psychiatry history, a positive family psychiatric history was found in only 8 (2%) students.

Sleepiness in daytime and quality of sleep were assessed by the EPSS and PSQI, respectively (Table/Fig 2). Majority of the students (n=360, 90%) had an EPSS score of 10 or higher and the mean EPSS score was found to be 10.68 (3.481), suggestive of high daytime somnolence. The mean of global PSQI scale was found to be 6.76 (1.811) which was above the cut-off of 5, clearly suggestive that the overall sleep quality was poor in almost all of the undergraduate medical students.

The scores of individual subscales of DASS-21 and PGWBI are in (Table/Fig 2). Almost 67% of the students (n=268) had DASS-21 anxiety score of more than 15. The mean of DASS-21 anxiety subscale was found to be 15.50 (2.621), which indicates severe anxiety levels. The authors also found that nearly all students (n=399) were suffering from stress, out of which 249 students (62.25%) had a score of 22 or above which indicates moderate to severe level of stress. The stress scores resulted in a mean of 22.82, which implies that most of the students were suffering from moderate level of stress. Only 87 of the 400 participating students (21.75%) reported having a score higher than 9 in DASS-21 depression subscale. The mean score of depression subscale was found to be 5.76 (3.977), which was below the cut-off score of 10 for depression. The mean score of PGWBI was 40.75 with almost all the students had lower scores on PGWBI.

None of the students scored below the cut-off for anxiety in the DASS-21 Anxiety subscale, and had atleast mild anxiety or higher. Comparison of students with and without stress (Table/Fig 3) showed that the difference in anxiety was significant (t=2.476, p<0.05). When students with and without depression were compared with each other (Table/Fig 3), the difference was found to be significant (t=25.766, p<0.01).

The correlations between EPSS and DASS and between PSQI and DASS are given in (Table/Fig 4). There was significant weak positive correlation (Spearman’s rho value=0.110, p<0.05) between EPSS with DASS-21 anxiety score. The correlation between global PSQI with the DASS-21 anxiety scores were also found to be significantly weak positive (Spearman’s rho value=0.118, p<0.05). The correlation between the stress levels was also seen to be significantly moderately strong positive with EPSS (Spearman’s rho value=0.452, p<0.01) and PSQI (Spearman’s rho value=0.410, p<0.01). The correlations between depression and EPSS (Spearman’s rho value=0.070, p<0.05) and between depression and PSQI (Spearman’s rho value=-0.197, p<0.05) were not found to be significant in this study. While the correlation between PGWBI with PSQI was found to be significantly weak positive (Spearman’s rho value=0.119, p<0.05), that with EPSS was not significant (Spearman’s rho value=0.035, p<0.05).

Discussion

The present study endeavoured to evaluate sleep quality and daytime somnolence of undergraduate medical students and their relationship with emotional states and psychological well-being. Similar studies have been conducted in India (8) and in the Indian subcontinent- in Nepal (16) and Pakistan (17). Some of the studies had smaller sample sizes of 150 (8), 280 (16) and 217 (17), or did not assess daytime sleepiness (16),(17), or did not incorporate tools to assess mental health consequences (8),(17). The present study tried to overcome some of the limitations. This study had almost similar age range, gender and semester-wise representation as was found in similar studies of comparable sample sizes examining sleep patterns of medical undergraduates (8),(16),(17). The mean age in the study was 20.39 (1.48) years which is comparable to the mean ages in years of 22.4 (0.50) in the study by Giri PA et al., 21.1 (1.78) by Waqas A et al., and 21.39 (1.6) by Sundas N et al., (8),(16),(17). Females constituted 47.5% of the study sample, which compared to 60%, and 52.5% was lower (8),(17), and compared to 43.7% (16) was almost similar. Of the 400 students that took part in the study, the MBBS- year-wise percentage was 1st MBBS: 99 (24.75); 2nd MBBS: 101 (25.25); 3rd MBBS Part 1: 100 (25) and 3rd MBBS Part 2: 100 (25) was suggestive of equal year-wise representation in the study when compared to other similar studies by Waqas A et al.,: 1st (22%), 2nd (25%), 3rd (18.3%) and final year (34.7%), and by Sundas N et al.,: 1st (25.3%), 2nd (16.6%), 3rd (27.6%) and 4th (30.4%) (16),(17).

Most of the medical students in the study had high scores with a mean of 10.68 (3.48) on the EPSS. This implies that many medical undergraduates had daytime sleepiness. A study (18) of Brazilian medical students had found higher EPSS scores of 10.00 (3.69) which is comparable to the EPSS score in the present study. Furthermore, a study (19) of medical and non medical undergraduates found that more than 64% of medical undergraduates had a sleep score of >9 which increases the probability of sleeping in daytime and a higher risk in medical students in comparison to students of nursing and pharmacy.

The mean PSQI score in this study was found to be 6.75 (1.811), which is suggestive of poor sleep quality, as global PSQI score above the cut-off score of 5 is regarded as significant sleep disturbance. A large multicentric study of college students had also found lower total scores 6.87 (3.29) in PQSI, which is close to the score in this study (20). Similar studies of medical students in the subcontinent reveals lower PSQI scores and more medical students having poor sleep quality (16),(17),(21). While the study by Waqas A et al., had a PSQI score of 8.1 (3.12) with over 77% falling into the category of poor sleepers (16), the study by Sundas N et al., had 44.23% of students who had a PSQI score less than 5 (17). The mean PSQI score was 7.3 (1.5) and nearly 40% of the students were classified as poor sleepers in the study involving medical students in Karachi (21). A study of 308 Indian medical students’ use of analgesics as self-medication and its association with quality of sleep using the PSQI found that 122 (39.6%) medical undergraduate students were categorised as poor sleepers with the global PSQI score more than 5 (22).

It becomes quite essential that medical students who have a tough syllabus, tight academic schedules and clinical postings and the stress of frequent examinations and high expectations must have good sleep in terms of both quality and quantity and have negligible daytime sleepiness so that their academics are not affected. Curcio G et al., in their review of studies on relationship between sleep, learning and memory processes suggest that sleep duration and quality are strongly correlated with student learning and academic achievement (23). A study conducted by Bahammam AS et al., using the EPSS found a negative association between students’ academic performance and various sleep variables (24). Students who received better grades in college slept for longer periods of time during the week and went to bed earlier than average students who scored higher on the EPSS and reported feeling sleepy more frequently.

Nearly, all of the participants in the study reported feeling stressed and anxious, and the subjective psychological well-being score was found to be low. However, not many students had a cut-off for depression. It is commonly established that academic pressures and other elements can significantly affect student’s physical and mental well-being in medical schools (25). A study of medical students in Lahore (16) using the Perceived Stress Scale-14 found nearly 60% of medical undergraduates reported to have high stress levels from academic reasons. Frequent examinations, concerns about academic performance, the burden of the academic curriculum and lack of leisure time were among the major reasons of academic stress. Psychosocial stressors such as unexpected high parental expectations, poor cafeteria food quality, loneliness, living away from home also played a significant contribution.

The present study found significant positive correlations between EPSS and PSQI with the anxiety subscale of DASS-21 (Table/Fig 4). This implies that students who had more daytime sedation were also the ones who had clinically significant levels of anxiety and the overall poor sleep quality correlated with clinically significant anxiety levels. Similarly, it was found that higher daytime sedation and poorer sleep quality in medical undergraduates who were more likely to have higher levels of stress as obtained in the correlations of the sleep scales with the stress subscale of DASS-21. The study showed that overall sleep quality also affected the psychological general well-being of the students.

In their longitudinal study of college students using PSQI and DASS-21, Zou P et al., found a bidirectional association between sleep quality and the individual subscale DASS-21 scores (26). The global PSQI score was strongly correlated with the scores on DASS-21 in the initial assessment and during the follow-up. The scores of depressive, anxious, and stress-related subscales were correlated with the sleep quality both at baseline and in the follow-up.

These relationships between daytime sleepiness and poor sleep quality and the emotional dimensions of the DASS-21 have both immediate and important mental health repercussions. Initial sleeplessness, dreams that keep you awake, night time eating habits, daily tiredness, and sleeping during the day were all linked to depression and anxiety in a group of Estonian medical students (27). Sleep disturbances can either cause or precipitate psychiatric disorders, may often be the initial symptom and significant complaint in many psychiatric disorders and can occur as a co-morbid psychiatric disorder (28).

In the John Hopkins longitudinal study, 1053 medical students were followed-up for over 30 years and their problems in sleep, depression and psychiatric distress were recorded (29). Those who had reported insomnia in medical school and difficulty in sleeping under stress were more likely to have clinical depression compared to those who did not have insomnia and difficulty sleeping under stress. According to that study, insomnia was a sign of psychological distress throughout the period of 30 years. According to a Brazilian study (30), medical students who reported excessive tiredness, occasional sleep disruption, insomnia, or less than seven hours of sleep per day had a cumulative risk ratio of 5.47 for minor psychiatric illnesses. The DASS-21 Depression subscale scores and the EPSS and PSQI scores did not correlate in the study. In contrast, in another study (31), a strong correlation was found between poor sleep quality and depression.

The results of the present study’s observations clearly demonstrated that, the study group’s participants had poor sleep quantity and quality, which had a major negative impact on their mental health, in line with the study hypothesis. The strength of the present study was that the sample size which is comparable to similar studies. The study included medical students from all academic years and had both male and female students in near equal proportions. Future studies could be multicentric-involving more medical colleges, could use the scales employed in this study backed by polysomnography findings for more objectivity, could evaluate students for longer periods than a week as required in the scales, and also include interventions for sleep disorders to evaluate whether improvement in sleep quality would have corresponding better outcomes in mental health in medical undergraduate students.

Limitation(s)

The present study had some limitations. The self-reporting of sleep habits which depended on the students’ subjective views, raising the chance that the students may not have accurately described their sleeping patterns and the day time sleepiness. Even the DASS-21 and PGWBI are self-reporting questionnaire. No inferences about the long-term consequences of inadequate sleep can be made by the present study, since it was a cross-sectional study.

Conclusion

The present study made it quite evident that undergraduate medical students, who were enrolled in various semesters had inadequate sleep and also struggled with daytime sleepiness. The majority of the participants had anxiety and stress-related problems. Sleep was also discovered to have an impact on psychological health. Those medical undergraduate students who reported poorer sleep quality and increased daytime sedation had higher levels of anxiety and stress. Also, students with poor quality of sleep had lower psychological general well-being. Much emphasis has to be given, to the sleep of medical undergraduate students.

References

1.
Pilcher JJ, Ott ES. The relationships between sleep and measures of health and wellbeing in college students: A repeated measures approach. Behav Med. 1998;23(4):17078. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Benca RM, Cirelli C, Tononi G. Basic Science of Sleep. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P, editors. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. 9th ed. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. Pp. 365-364.
3.
Vallido T, Peters K, O’Brien L, Jackson D. Sleep in adolescence: A review of issues for nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(13):1819-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Chokroverty S. Overview of sleep and sleep disorders. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131(2):126-40.
5.
Daniela T, Alessandro C, Giuseppe C, Fabio M, Cristina M, Luigi D, et al. Lack of sleep affects the evaluation of emotional stimuli. Brain Res Bull. 2010;82(1-2):104-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Lima PF, Medeiros AL, Rolim SA, Dias Júnior SA, Almondes KM, Araújo JF. Changes in sleep habits of medical students according to class starting time: A longitudinal study. Sleep Sci.2009;2(2):92-95.
7.
Pace-Schott E, Hutcherson C, Bemporad B, Morgan A, Kumar A, Hobson J, et al. Failure to find executive function deficits following one night’s total sleep deprivation in university students under naturalistic conditions. Behav Sleep Med. 2009;7(3):136-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Giri PA, Baviskar MP, Phalke DB. Study of sleep habits and sleep problems among medical students of Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Loni, Western Maharashtra, India. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3(1):51-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Wong JG, Patil NG, Beh SL, Cheung EP, Wong V, Chan LC, et al. Cultivating psychological well-being in Hong Kong’s future doctors. Med Teach. 2005;27(8):715-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Kim EJ, Dimsdale JE. The effect of psychosocial stress on sleep: A review of polysomnographic evidence. Behav Sleep Med. 2007;5(4):256-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Abdulghani HM, Alrowais NA, Bin-Saad NS, Al-Subaie NM, Haji AM, Alhaqwi AI. Sleep disorder among medical students: Relationship to their academic performance. Med Teach. 2012;34Suppl 1:S37-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
John M. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6)540-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Buysse D, Reynolds C, Monk T, Berman S, Kupfer D. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193-213. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Rasmussen NA, Norholm V, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWB). Quality of Life News Letter. 1999;22:7.
16.
Waqas A, Khan S, Sharif W, Khalid U, Ali A. Association of academic stress with sleeping difficulties in medical students of a Pakistani medical school: A cross sectional survey. Peer J. 2015;3:e840. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Sundas N, Ghimire S, Bhusal S, Pandey R, Rana K, Dixit H. Sleep quality among medical students of a tertiary care hospital: A descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58 (222):76-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Alóe F, Pedroso A, Tavares SM. Epworth sleepiness scale outcome in 616 Brazilian medical students. ArqNeuropsiquiatr. 1997;55(2):220-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Naeem A, Kiblawi M, Kiblawi M, Ahmad E, Samad S, Samad A, et al. Comparison of daytime sleepiness in Medical University Students using Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Psychology and Social Behavior Research. 2014;2(2):58. [crossref]
20.
Becker SP, Jarrett MA, Luebbe AM, Garner AA, Burns GL, Kofler MJ. Sleep in a large, multi-university sample of college students: Sleep problem prevalence, sex differences, and mental health correlates. Sleep Health. 2018;4(2):174-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Surani AA, Zahid S, Surani A, Ali S, Mubeen M, Khan RH. Sleep quality among medical students of Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65(4):380-82.
22.
Kumar A, Vandana, Aslam AN. Analgesicsself-medication and its association with sleep quality among medical undergraduates. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(12):07-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Curcio G, Ferrara M, De Gennaro L. Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance. Sleep Med Rev. 2006;10(5):323-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Bahammam AS, AlaseemAM, Alzakri AA, Almeneessier AS, Sharif MM. The relationship between sleep and wake habits and academic performance in medical students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:61. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Azad MC, Fraser K, Rumana N, Abdullah AF, Shahana N, Hanly PJ, et al. Sleep disturbances among medical students: A global perspective. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015;11(1):69-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Zou P, Wang X, Sun L, Liu K, Hou G, Yang W, et al. Poorer sleep quality correlated with mental health problems in college students: A longitudinal observational study among 686 males. J Psychosom Res. 2020;136:110177. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Eller T, Aluoja A, Vasar V, Veldi M. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in Estonian medical students with sleep problems. Depress Anxiety. 2006;23:250-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Ford DE, Kamerow DB. Epidemiologic study of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders. An opportunity for prevention? JAMA. 1989;262(11):1479-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Chang PP, Ford DE, Mead LA, Cooper-Patrick L, Klag MJ. Insomnia in young men and subsequent depression. The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(2):105-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Hidalgo MP, Caumo W. Sleep disturbances associated with minor psychiatric disorders in medical students. NeurolSci. 2002;23:35-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Feng G, Chen J, Yang X. Study on the status and quality of sleep-related influencing factors in medical college students. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing XueZaZhi. 2005;26:328-31.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60633.17524

Date of Submission: Oct 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 12, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 09, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 10, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 06, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com