Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 1567

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : BC01 - BC04 Full Version

Serum Magnesium Levels in Chronic Kidney Disease with and without Diabetes Mellitus and its Correlation with Calcium and Phosphate Levels: A Case-control Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62558.17585
M Deepthi, Sujatha Mahadevarao Premnath

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Science, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sujatha Mahadevarao Premnath,
C5, Staff Quarters, PIMS Campus, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Science, Puducherry, India.
E-mail: drsuj85@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly 10% of the world population is affected by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Hypermagnesaemia is seen in late stages of CKD whereas Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is commonly associated with hypomagnesaemia. Monitoring Mg levels and early correction may prevent the future risk for cardiovascular and CKD.

Aim: To compare the serum Mg levels in healthy controls, diabetic patients without CKD, late stages of CKD with and without diabetes and to evaluate its correlation with serum phosphate and calcium levels in CKD patients.

Materials and Methods: A case-control study was conducted in Vydehi Institute of Health Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India from January 2018 to December 2019. A total of 100 participants were divided into four groups of 25 each. Group I were healthy controls, Group II were DM patients without CKD, Group III CKD stage 3 and more without DM and Group IV CKD stage 3 and more with DM. Serum creatinine, urea, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), calcium, phosphorous and magnesium levels were estimated in all the groups. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation was used to statistically analyse the data.

Results: The Group III participants who had CKD but no DM were relatively younger in age (mean age 48.5±5.5 years) compared to other groups and there was a significant difference in the age group between four groups (p-value 0.0113). Though there was a male preponderance in all the four groups, the gender difference was not significant. Significant difference in the Mg was observed between the four groups (p-value <0.001). The DM group showed low serum magnesium. CKD patients with and without DM showed high but within reference range Mg levels. Sub-group analysis revealed DM patients on haemodialysis had lower Mg level as compared to non DM. Mg levels in CKD showed significant positive correlation with phosphorous levels (r-value 0.5002, p-value 0.0002).

Conclusion: High levels of Mg in late stages of CKD are expected but CKD with DM had relatively low Mg level. Low Mg level was also seen in DM patients on haemodialysis.

Keywords

Blood glucose, Haemodialysis, Hypermagnesaemia, Phosphorus, Renal failure

The CKD is a state of progressive loss of kidney function diagnosed when the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) is less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, persisting for three months or more, irrespective of the cause (1). Epidemiological update of 2022 states that the current total number of individuals affected by CKD stages 1-5 worldwide was estimated to be 843 million (2). In India, the prevalence is approximately 800 per million populations (3). The most common cause of CKD being diabetic nephropathy contributes to 41% of the cases (3).

Kidneys play a central role in the homeostasis of multivalent cations like calcium, phosphorous, and magnesium. Kidneys regulate the serum concentration of these ion through filtration, reabsorption and tubular secretion. Magnesium (Mg) is a cofactor for more than 300 enzyme systems that regulate protein synthesis, muscle and nerve function, blood glucose control, blood pressure regulation etc., (4).

In CKD stage 1-3, an increase in fractional Mg excretion which compensates for the reduced GFR so, Mg levels are regulated within the normal range. In advanced CKD stage, due to impaired tubular reabsorption, the compensatory mechanisms become inadequate and fractional excretion of Mg increases resulting in overt hypermagnesaemia (5),(6). Low magnesium levels stimulates the parathormone secretion which might result in increased vascular calcification. Vascular calcification is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease, and thus has bad prognosis in CKD (7),(8).

The DM is often associated with reduced Mg levels (9). Nearly, 13-47% of the diabetics suffer from hypomagnesaemia and the incidence is common in patients with poor glycaemic control and longer duration of disease (10). Few of the common causes are reduced dietary intake, hyperinsulinaemia, glomerular hyperfiltration, hypophosphataemia etc. Hypomagnesaemia in turn causes increased insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and dyslipidaemia (10).

Studies which have explored the Mg metabolism in CKD also states that hypermagnesaemia is more prevalent in late stages of CKD (11),(12),(13). But studies comparing the Mg metabolism in CKD due to DM and causes other than DM are scarce. So, with such extremes of pictures in diabetes and CKD, the present study was aimed to evaluate the Mg level in advanced CKD patients with and without diabetes. Since Mg has many vital functions, knowledge of Mg homeostasis might reduce the risk of future CVD and CKD progression. The study has hypothesised that serum Mg level may be low in CKD due to diabetes compared to other causes of CKD.

Hence, present study was conducted to compare the serum Mg levels in healthy controls, diabetic patients without CKD, late stages of CKD with and without diabetes and to evaluate its correlation with serum phosphate and calcium levels in CKD patients.

Material and Methods

This case-control study was conducted from January 2018 to December 2019 by the Department of Biochemistry in Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Ref No VIMS7RC/IEC/103). Informed consent was taken from all the participants after explaining the procedure of the study. Confidentiality of the data was maintained during the study.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 100 participants aged more than 18 years, recruited for the study, were divided into the following four groups.

• Group I consisted of 25 healthy controls.
• Group II consist of 25 known cases of DM with normal eGFR.
• Group III consist of 25 patients with stage 3-5 CKD without DM.
• Group IV with 25 CKD patients of stage 3-5 with DM.

Stage 3 of CKD is when the eGFR falls between 30-59 mL/
min/1.73 m², Stage 4 is 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m², Stage 5 when eGFR less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m² (14).

Diagnosis of DM was done using American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria using any of the following.

• Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 6.5% or higher.
• Fasting plasma glucose level of 126 mg/dL or higher.
• Two-hour plasma glucose level of 200 mg/dL or higher during a 75-g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT).
• Random plasma glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher in a patient with symptoms of hyperglycaemia (polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, weight loss) or hyperglycaemic crisis (15).

For the sub-group analysis, patients with CKD (Group III and IV) were subdivided into CKD on haemodialysis and without haemodialysis.

Exclusion criteria: Participants with stage 1 and 2 CKD, known case of chronic liver diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption syndrome, history of diuretic intake, Mg supplementation, antacid intake, recent intake of proton pump inhibitors were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Estimation of the sample size was done by iterative procedure using the formula for Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) N=λ/f2 where λ is non centrality parameter, f is effect size calculated from f=σk/σ where σk=vSk i=1 (μi-μ)2/k. Assuming type I error 0.05, power(1-β) is 80, difference between the mean of the groups μ as 1.8 mg/dL and expected Standard Deviation (SD) σk as 0.45 the required sample size was 96 for four groups together (16).

Study Procedure

Basic demographic details like age and gender, history of diabetes, year diagnosed, medication history, and in CKD patient cause of CKD, whether under haemodialysis or not and frequency of dialysis were recorded in a structured case report form. A 5 mL of blood samples was collected from all the participants. The blood samples were estimated for serum creatinine, urea, calcium, phosphorous, magnesium and eGFR. Serum creatinine was estimated by modified Jaffe’s method, reference range 0.60-1.24 mg/dL for males and 0.40-1.00 mg/dL for females. Serum urea was estimated using urease reference range 13-43 mg/dL. Serum calcium using ion selective electrode reference range 8.5-10.2 mg/dL. Serum Phosphorous using ammonium molybdate method reference range 2.5-4.5 mg/dL. Serum magnesium was estimated using calmagite chromogen method reference range 1.8-2.9 mg/dL. Magnesium forms a purple-coloured complex when reacts with Calmagite in alkaline solution. The intensity of the colour formed is proportional to the magnesium concentration in the sample. CKD was diagnosed using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation where eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m² is given by 175×(Serum creatinine)-1.154 ×(Age)-0.203 ×(0.742 if female) (17).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences(SPSS) version 22.0 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyse the data. Normally distributed data are expressed as mean±SD (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare normally distributed data between multiple groups. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The relationships of Mg with calcium and phosphorous was analysed using Pearson’s correlation. A p-value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

The Group III participants who had CKD but no DM were relatively younger in age compared to other groups and there was a significant difference in the age group between four groups. Though, there was a male preponderance in all the four groups, the gender difference was not significant. There was a significant difference in the serum creatinine, urea, eGFR, serum phosphorous and serum magnesium, but there was no significant difference found in serum calcium levels among four groups. Highest serum creatinine and lowest eGFR was observed in the Group IV participants who had both DM and CKD. All groups except Group II had mean Mg values within the normal range (Table/Fig 1).

The overall prevalence of hypermagnesaemia was more compared to hypomagnesaemia. Hypermagnesaemia was the most common Mg disturbance is Group III and IV. Hypomagnesaemia was more prevalent in Group II as compared to ther groups. In group 1 (controls), out of 25 subjects, 23 (92%) had normal magnesium level (Table/Fig 2).

There were 22 patients in the CKD group who were on haemodialysis. Sub-group analysis of the patients with and without DM showed that there were significantly high Mg levels in patients without haemodialysis (Table/Fig 3).

A significant positive correlation was found between serum Mg and phosphorous levels in CKD patients (r=0.5002 and p-value 0.0002) (Table/Fig 4). But there was non significant, negative correlation between Mg and calcium among the CKD patients (r=-0.149, p-value 0.3) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The CKD is a highly prevalent condition with increase in incidence in the recent years (16). Disturbances in phosphorous, calcium and magnesium start developing in the early stages and eventually affect most of the patient during the disease (14). Many studies have mapped out the role of Mg in CKD [5,6,15]. But Mg metabolism in CKD with DM is not much explored. Despite this, it is well known that serum Mg levels increases when the GFR goes below 30 mL/min and hypomagnesaemia is one of the common disturbances observed in diabetics [5,10]. This study was determined to evaluate the Mg homeostasis in CKD patients with and without DM and to compare the same in healthy controls and in DM.

One of the major findings in present study was that the participants with CKD had a higher Mg level as compared to subjects with non CKD. This is in concordance with the fact that in later stages of CKD as the GFR falls, the filtered load of Mg falls. However, the resorption capacity remains same. This process ultimately leads to a picture of hypomagnesaemia especially in late stages of CKD. But present study did not show picture of overt hypermagnesaemia in the CKD group and the levels were within the normal range. The prevalence of hypermagnesaemia in Group III and IV was the highest. In a study done on 693 CKD patients by Afonso R et al., the mean Mg levels in CKD patients was 1.8 mg/dL (18). Similarly a multicentric study done in China found that hypermagnesaemia was common in CKD stage 5 (19).

Another Important finding is that the CKD group with DM had relatively low Mg compared to CKD without DM. The common causes of CKD without DM in Group III were nephrotic syndrome, obstructive uropathy, hypertension etc. This finding is also concordant with the finding of reduced Mg levels in patients with diabetic nephropathy [20-22]. One of the study done in China by Feng J et al., showed that the Mg levels in diabetics with albuminuria was relatively low (21). Another study conducted in India on diabetic nephropathy patients, the mean Mg levels were 1.98 mg/dL compared to non DM who had serum Mg level of 2.05 mg/dL (22).

Studies done by Eisenman K and Holley JL; and Gonella M et al., suggested that the Mg levels in End Stage Renal Disease patient depends on the dialysate Mg levels [23,24]. Even though the prescribed Mg in dialysate is 1.5 mg/dL most of the haemodialysis patients have hypermagnesaemia (24). In the present study, patients on haemodialysis had a relatively higher Mg values compared to CKD not on haemodialysis. Sub-group analysis again revealed that DM on haemodialysis had low Mg levels. So, the overall finding is that the late CKD patient with DM has a relatively low Mg levels compared to non DM patients.

It is a well-known fact that Mg inhibits the calcium and phosphorous mediated vessel wall calcification and Mg inhibits the calcium absorption in intestines. So a correlation analysis to see the effect of Mg on calcium levels was also done. In present study, a significant positive correlation was found between serum Mg and phosphorous levels in CKD patients, but there was non significant, negative correlation between Mg and calcium among the CKD patients. In a study done by Sakaguchi Y et al., on 574 CKD patients no significant correlation between Mg and Ca was seen. However significant positive correlation between Mg and Phosphorus was seen (25).

Low Mg levels stimulate the parathormone secretion leading to hypercalcaemia. CKD patients having high phosphate and calcium levels are at high risk for future cardiovascular disease due to vessel wall calcification (22). Many studies have proven that hypomagnesaemia causes increase in all-cause mortality in CKD patients and individuals with prolonged hypomagnesaemia progress to end stage renal disease quickly compared to others [11,26,27]. Also, high magnesium levels inhibit the Ca absorption in intestines. In the present study, the authors found a significant positive correlation between serum Mg and Phosphate levels and negative correlation between Mg and calcium. The high Mg levels in late stages of CKD disease indicates that the protective mechanism of Mg eventually falls as the disease progresses.

With all these findings, it imparts that Mg plays a predominant role in CKD also involved in the calcium and phosphorous homeostasis. So, it is mandatory to routinely look for Mg levels right from the onset of CKD and during the prepathological state which is DM. Routine monitoring and maintenance of Mg in early course of disease may slow down the progression.

Limitation(s)

One of the limitations in present study was the study design. A prospective study monitoring Mg levels at constant intervals would have shown if there is any dynamic change in Mg levels over a period of time. Also, vessel wall calcification was not measured. Studies on association of Mg levels with vessel wall calcification and risk for CVD in CKD should be done in future. In present study, controls were not age-matched with cases.

Conclusion

The CKD patients with DM have a lower Mg level compared to CKD patients without DM. The sub-group analysis of CKD patients showed again the DM patients on haemodialysis had lesser Mg values compared to non DM patients. In later stages of CKD, the Mg levels have a positive correlation with phosphorous levels indicating the reduced antagonistic action of Mg on phosphorous. Since low Mg level is associated with early progression to CVD, in future studies, on the association of Mg levels with inflammatory markers and risk scores can be done in CKD patients. Also, the association of Mg with proteinuria can also be done to predict the severity of CKD.

References

1.
Chen TK, Knicely DH, Grams ME. Chronic kidney disease diagnosis and management: A review. JAMA. 2019;322(13):1294-304. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kovesdy CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: An update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2022;12(1):07-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Agarwal SK, Srivastava RK. Chronic kidney disease in India: Challenges and solutions. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;111(3):197-203. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Allen MJ, Sharma S. Magnesium. [Updated 2022 Mar 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519036/. (Accessed on Dec 2022).
5.
Hamano N, Komaba H, Fukagawa M. Magnesium as a new player in CKD: Too little is as bad as too much? Kidney International. 2017;92(5):1034-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Cunningham J, Rodríguez M, Messa P. Magnesium in chronic kidney disease Stages 3 and 4 and in dialysis patients. Clin Kidney J. 2012;5(Suppl 1):i39-i51. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Peride I, Tiglis M, Neagu TP, Niculae A, Checherita IA. Magnesium-A more important role in CKD–MBD than we thought. Diagnostics. 2022;12(4):880. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
van de Wal-Visscher ER, Kooman JP, van der Sande FM. Magnesium in chronic kidney disease: Should we care? Blood Purif. 2018;45(1-3):173-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Barbagallo M, Dominguez LJ. Magnesium and type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(10):1152-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Pham PC, Pham PM, Pham SV, Miller JM, Pham PT. Hypomagnesemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(2):366-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Azem R, Daou R, Bassil E, Anvari EM, Taliercio JJ, Arrigain S, et al. Serum magnesium, mortality and disease progression in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):49. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kotha NB, Murugan G, Manikandan A, Selvarajan S, Muthukathan R. Serum magnesium levels in chronic kidney disease patients. Sri Ramachandra J Health Sci. 2022;2(1):29-32. [crossref]
13.
Patel H, Redkar V, Kulkarni A, Kale A. A study of serum magnesium level in patients with chronic renal failure at tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2018;5(10):05-08. [crossref]
14.
Sakaguchi Y. The emerging role of magnesium in CKD. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2022;26(5):379-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Oliveira B, Cunningham J, Walsh SB. Magnesium balance in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2018;25(3):291-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Mohebbi M, Samadi K, Navari N, Ziafati-fahmideh-sani M, Nourihosseini G, Ershad N, et al. The association between serum magnesium level and microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2021;13(1):e112373. [crossref]
17.
Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, et al; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):247-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Afonso R, Marques RC, Borges H, Cabrita A, Silva AP. The usefulness of calcium/ magnesium ratio in the risk stratification of early onset of renal replacement therapy. Diagnostics. 2022;12(10):2470. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Wang J, Lin S, Li HY, Tang W, Liu Y, Zhou T. Influencing factors of serum magnesium in CKD5 patients: A multicenter study in southern China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1047602. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047602. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Dewitte K, Dhondt A, Giri M, Stöckl D, Rottiers R, Lameire N, et al. Differences in serum ionized and total magnesium values during chronic renal failure between nondiabetic and diabetic patients: A cross-sectional study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2503-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Feng J, Wang H, Jing Z, Wang Y, Wang W, Jiang Y, et al. Relationships of the trace elements zinc and magnesium with diabetic nephropathy-associated renal functional damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Med. 2021;8:626909. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Moradiya K, Muley A. A study of serum magnesium level in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with glycemic control and its complications. Int J Non Commun Dis. 2021;6(1):34-37. [crossref]
23.
Eisenman K, Holley JL. A higher magnesium dialysate concentration treats hypomagnesemia. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25(6):604-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Gonella M, Buzzigoli G, Bencivelli W, Bartolini V, Betti G. The determination of whole blood magnesium concentration in uremics on chronic dialysis. Nephron. 1981;28(24):88-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Sakaguchi Y, Hamano T, Isaka Y. Effects of magnesium on the phosphate toxicity in chronic kidney disease: Time for intervention studies. Nutrients. 2017;9(2):112. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Li L, Streja E, Rhee CM, Mehrotra R, Soohoo M, Brunelli SM, et al. Hypomagnesemia and mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(6):1047-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Negrea L, DeLozier SJ, Janes JL. Serum magnesium and cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in CKD: The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC). Kidney Med. 2021;3(2):183-92.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62558.17585

Date of Submission: Dec 30, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 24, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 24, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 31, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 21, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com