Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 125569

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : ME01 - ME05 Full Version

Middle Ear Function Changes due to the Combined Effect of Pressure along with Fluid in Middle Ear Pressure Regulation- A Review


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60719.17632
Puja Dinkar Lanjekar, Sagar Gaurkar

1. Undergraduate Student, Department of ENT, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of ENT, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Puja Dinkar Lanjekar,
Undergraduate Student, Department of ENT, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Sawangi Meghe, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: lanjekarpuja@gmail.com

Abstract

The pressure changes in Middle Ear (ME) are due to the effect of both fluid and pressure, which can be detected by tympanometry. In this review article, the mathematical and formal model of regulation of ME pressure is discussed. The air pressure in the ME chamber and the surrounding environment are the same. The auditory tube is a common connection between the ME chamber and the nasopharynx. The main functional role of the auditory tube is the ventilation of ME. When a person breathes air through an auditory tube, it enters into the ME and ventilates it. The ossicles in the ME collect sound from the tympanic membrane and transfer it to the inner ear, which requires proper ventilation of the ME. The auditory tube maintains ME pressure, the same as the external auditory canal and outside pressure. If an auditory tube is blocked, it leads to failure to ventilate ME, leading to changes in ME pressure. Swallowing and yawning allow the passive opening of the auditory tube and thus results in air flow out of the chamber. Easy and passive air exchange is allowed from the ME to the pharynx if, the pressure in the ME is higher than in the surrounding environment. ME pressure is highly variable and can change in many conditions. ME pressures increase when the body rotates from a vertical to a horizontal position because it increases the effusion of the ME mucosa due to an increase in hydrostatic pressure, which leads to an increase in the perfusion rate. Therefore, pressure increases in the case of sleeping and drowsiness. Regulation of ME pressure is a physiological process in which pressure between ME and the surrounding environment is maintained at equilibrium. The mechanism of pressure regulation is possible because of the complex sensory neural reflex pathway. A laser doppler vibrometer measures displacement of the tympanic membrane in response to sound and ME compliance is calculated by tympanometry. The movement of the tympanic membrane reduces due to the combined effect of fluid and pressure on the ME. The ME functions are altered due to the negative pressure of the fluid rather than the positive pressure.

Keywords

Auditory tube, Gas difference, Middle ear pressure, Otitis media

The Middle ear is a non collapsible and biotic gas chamber that is mainly closed (1),(2). The ME detects nearly continuous, low magnitude, high frequency, and variation of environmental pressure associated with sound, representing that flow as pressure-time signals for effective gas fluid coupling, which is presented to the cochlear perilymph (1),(3). The ME pressure is maintained approximately at atmospheric pressure, which is done by a sensory unit known as the tympanic membrane. Tympanic membrane functions like a diaphragm for various types of pressure sensors, and optimum signals are required so that the ME pressure is matched to the environment, that is, gas-gas coupling (3),(4),(5). It is difficult to find fixed limits for ME pressure as it is a very dynamic chamber, and the pressure changes for many reasons (6).

The presence of fluid in ME cleft is called Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) or secretory otitis media, or serous otitis media, and the fluid is thick and visible or thin and serous, usually related to changes in ME pressure. It is due to poor function of the eustachian tube and inflammatory reaction because of acute otitis media (7). The effusion in the ME cavity is categorised as mucoid, glue-like, and serous in various pathological conditions. OME is also called glue ear (7). Many studies suggest that hearing loss is associated with ME effusion (fluid) (7),(8),(9),(10). The low-frequency hearing loss was due to reduced ME volume, and high-frequency hearing loss was caused by an increasing mass of the tympanic membrane by entrained effusion fluid (8). In the study by Gan RZ et al., a vibration of the tympanic membrane and stapes was measured by changing the amount of fluid in the ME. The result of the tympanic membrane to the footplate of stapes displacement transmission ratio due to the effect of fluid on ME function is different between the three frequency range (10). The ME pressure mainly decreases tympanic membrane mobility at low frequencies (f >1 kHz) (10),(11). Effusion in patients of OME is closely related to negative pressure; the negative pressure, in combination with fluid pressure, has more effect on the function of the ME than positive pressure (7). Dai C et al., experiment combines three groups: ME pressure, fluid, and pressure-fluid combination in the human temporal bone, 0.3 mL saline solutions used as effusion, fills half of the ME cavity level above the umbo, and it produced movement in it. A displacement in response to 90dB sound load was measured by a laser doppler vibrometer, and ME compliance changes were measured by tympanometry (7). The result of Dai C et al., shows that the displacement at the umbo (tympanic membrane) was reduced upto 17dB due to the combined effect of fluid and pressure in the ME at all frequencies, at low frequency (f <1 kHz) displacement of tympanic membrane reduce due to combined effect of fluid and pressure is more as compared to ME fluid only. Still, its value is less than only ME pressure (7).

Regulation of ME pressure is a homeostatic process that controls ME environment-pressure gradient at the optimum level; this requires normal hearing (1). Pressure regulation in the ME is a model of the combined effect of the passive exchange of gas between the ME to the round window in perilymph, ME to the surrounding environment through the tympanic membrane, ME to topic blood vessels through mucous of the ME and most important gas transfers is via ME to the eustachian tube in the pharynx. The first three exchanges ME to perilymph, ME to local blood, and ME to the environment, are explained by using the equation of Fick’s diffuse and the fourth one as the displacement of bulk of the gas governed by Loiselle’s equation (1),(12). The total magnitude of a gas-pressure gradient in the ME is measured at standard ME volume, which is inversely proportional to the efficiency of normal healthy hearing (1),(13),(14). ME gas pressure gradient at -300daPa along with mucosal hydrostatic pressure gradient of the ME can cause a collapse of biological gas pocket (ME) with effusion of fluid from topical blood vessels into the ME cavity (1),(15),(16),(17). This clinical condition is related to moderate to severe conductive hearing loss (1),(18),(19). It is noticed that risk factors for moderate to severe conductive hearing loss are inversely proportional to ME pressure regulation efficiency (1),(19),(20),(21). The accepted explanation regarding the regulation of ME pressure is mainly related to flow; the passive diffusion of the volume of gas exchange occurs near the compartment, from the ME to the nasopharynx, through the opening of the eustachian tube (12).

SEARCH METHODOLOGY

Pubmed was used to search Medline and the Cochrane Library to search central databases. Pubmed search method was adapted to particular databases and was as {"ME pressure" (Title/Abstract)} AND {"otitis media" (Title/Abstract)} OR {"gas difference" (Title/Abstract)} OR {"auditory tube" (Title/Abstract)}. In addition, references list of potentially relevant papers for further was searched. Studies found through these electronic searches and relevant sources included in their bibliographies were examined. Original studies in English that assessed the risk factors, diagnosis and management were included (Table/Fig 1).

THEORY OF GASES EXCHANGE

Structure of Gas Exchange System
The ME is a bony chamber, having allotted volume, with constant temperature, and filled with air. It is lined all around by mucous membrane, and it is a six (anterior wall, posterior wall, lateral wall, middle wall, roof, and floor) walled cavity like a six-sided box. It is placed in a canal in the petrous part of the temporal bone (22). ME chambers are divided into two parts, anterior and posterior. The anterior is known as the ME proper; it continues as a single layer of epithelial cells covering a matrix of connective tissue on it and veins, arteritis, and capillary embedded into it, which is useful for metabolism at a cellular level. The posterior part is also called the mastoid air cell system, and its volume is subdivided into various hair cells by the mucous covering over the bony septa. Three ossicles in the ME (malleus, incus, and stapes) conduct pressure exerted by the tympanic membrane towards the oval window of the ME. The middle ear alone with mastoid air cell, eustachian tube, aditus, and antrum is known as middle ear cleft. The tympanic membrane forms a barrier between an external auditory canal and the ME, and it forms a lateral wall of the ME out of the six walls. In the medial wall of the ME, important structures are located; these are openings due to an oval window where the footplate of stapes is connected and a round window which is covered by a round window membrane, also called as secondary tympanic membrane located inferior and posterior to the oval window. The anterior wall has two openings: a eustachian tube at the lower end and the canal for the tensor tympani muscle at the upper end (22).

An auditory tube, also known as the eustachian tube, connects the ME chamber and the nasopharynx (20). It goes downward, forwards, and medially it comprises one-third bony and two-thirds fibrocartilaginous parts. The bony part lies posteriorly, and the remaining fibro cartilaginous part lies anteriorly and is made up of single cartilage. Muscles associated with the auditory tube are tensor veli palatini, levator veli palatini, and salpingopharyngeus. The tensor veli palatini’s medial fibres originate from the auditory tube’s lateral lamina; it is a narrow and inverted triangle shape muscle (1),(23). The function of tensor veli palatini and salpingopharyngeus is to open the lumen of the auditory tube; the contraction of the fibre of muscles results in an opening of the auditory tube as in the case of swallowing and yawning (1),(24),(25). For the normal healthy hearing of voice, it is required that the pressure of the ME cavity and surrounding environment pressure is equal; a change in pressure in ME, whether negative or positive, can affect hearing. Also, the passive opening of the auditory tube by creating negative pressure causes the tubular lumen to close when the ME cavity pressure is higher than the pressure inside the lumen (1),(26).

Expansion of Gas Pressure

For chamber (C) carrying gas in the gas phase (G) or dissolution of gas in liquid (L) and the chamber pressure (PCs). PCs are the same as the product of molar concentration species for chamber (CCs) and the inverse capacitance coefficient for chamber βCs. Molar concentration species for chamber (CCs) is given by the ratio of molar (ηCs) to a product of the volume of the chamber (VC) (1),(27).

PCs=CCs/βCs=ηCs/(VC× βCs)......(1)

PCs will never be negative except in case of negative volume, mole. The negative pressure maintains in the article is gauge pressure. The extra pressure in system relative to the environmental pressure is known as gauge pressure. The standard coefficient (β) of gases is inversely proportional to the products of the absolute temperature TG and universal gas constant R; now, according to formula 1,

PCs=ηCs/{VC/(R×TG)}......(2)

The coefficient, βCs get dissolved in water and solid. If there is more than one gas mixture, then it is calculated by using Dalton’s law, as total pressure is the sum of all given pressure. S sums the result.

The coefficient, βCs get dissolved in water and solid. If there is more than one gas mixture, then it is calculated by using Dalton’s law, as total pressure is the sum of all given pressure. S sums the result.

PCg=SsPCs={(R×TG)/VC}×SsηCs......(3)

βCs, the coefficient dissolved in the blood (liquid) and perilymph, it is the same as the solubility coefficient (SLs) it depends on the total temperature TL. Therefore, exchanging formula, 1 gives Henry’s law, PCs=ηCs/VC×SLs TL......(4)

In blood, some gases are free, and the rest are bound to the blood compound, therefore, molar concentration is always changing.

ACTIVITIES THAT INTERFERE WITH MIDDLE EAR(ME) PRESSURE

According to formula no 2 and 3, ME air pressure is:

PMEg=SsPMEs={(R×TME)÷VME}×Ss ηMEs......(5)

According to formula 5, ME cavity pressure is directly proportional to temperature and mole and is inversely proportional to volume. ME temperature is constant in organisms with constant body temperature (homeotherms). In those, minor deviation in temperature leads to poor effects on change in pressure. At constant temperature and volume and changing mole (Table/Fig 2), the formula for ME pressure is:

δPMEg=SsPMEs=(R×TME)÷VME×Ss δηMEs......(6)

Here, in the above formula 6, the change in pressure is directly proportional to mole at constant temperature and volume. The change in mole is due to the metabolism of free gas, binding of free gas with blood components, and biological or chemical change in gas structure. ME is a solitary cavity from the adjacent chamber, it doesn’t have any pore gas flow, only passive gas exchange through the auditory tube. These routes for pressure regulation in the ME are a model of the combined effect of: 1) passively exchange of gas between ME to round window in perilymph; 2) ME to the surrounding environment through tympanic membrane; 3) ME to topic blood vessels through mucous of the ME; and 4) additionally, most important gas transfers are via the ME to an auditory tube which is opened by contraction of muscles, an active and passive process in the pharynx.

The formula for the passive exchange of gas is similar to ohm’s low, I = V×? hear, I is current, V is voltage difference, and K is the conductance of current which is the inverse of resistance (30). After comparing with ohm’s formula, the passive exchange of gas mole MC1-C2 as a current is equal to the product of pressure gradient PC1-C2 as a voltage and gas movement in cavity Km as a conductance. Then the formula for passive gas exchange is:

MC-MEs,g=Kms,g×?PC1-MEs,g......(7)

Now, compared with formula 1, the effective gas exchange is,

δ PCs,g=δ ηCs÷(VC× βCs,g)=MC-MEs,g÷(VC×βCs,g)......(8)

The exchange of gases inside the chamber and trans-barrier flux reduces the pressure gradient, which gives by,

δ? PC1-MEs÷δt=MC-MEs÷(VME×βMEs)×(RβV(ME÷C)s+1)......(9)

Hear RβV(ME÷C) s is the ratio of products of capacitance and chamber volume; its value becomes zero if ME volume is infinite, as in negative pressure.

Trance Barrier Type of Exchange with the Middle Ear (ME)

Alternative for formula 7 is also relevant to gas exchange as of trance barrier, which is given by Fick’s law of diffusion. A barrier Fbs is 1 mole or distinct or time to create a barrier of surface area A b and coefficient D b s

Fb=Ab×Dbs×δ Cbs÷δ Lbd......(10)

Here, Chang in concentration Cbs and Lbd changes in linear distance, for ME specific formula is,

MC-MEs=(Ab×βbs×Dbs÷Lbd)×?C-MEs......(11)

The replacement of mole between compartments causes a gradual decrease in pressure gradient and a decrease in the exchange rate.

Gas Exchange throughout Open Auditory Tube

Registration of pressure gradient results in a flow of air into the nasopharynx through an opening of an Auditory Tube (AT) is explained by poiselle’s law,

MATg=KATg×?PME-NPg......(12)

Here, k is conductance; it is the viscosity of air (25). k an active auditory tube is measured by,

KATg=KFGEg (VME÷RTME)......(13)

Here, KFGE is a fractional gradient of swallow, explained as changes in pressure of ME chamber for swallow. Hear, VME÷RTME is not changing; thus, mole is directly proposed for ME pressure. After combining formulas,

MATg÷?tET0=KFGEg (VME÷RTME)?PME-NPg÷?tET0......(14)

As negative pressure has infinite gas volume, this results in changes in formula

δPATg÷?tET0=?PME-NPg÷?tET0=(VME÷RTME) (?tET0÷δnME)......(15)

For post openings, ME pressure is given by,

PMEg(t=i?t+to)=PMEg(t=i?t)+δPME-NPg÷?tET0......(16)

ME pressures change due to auditory tube opening, for pre-openings total air pressure, compared with formula 15:

δP ATs÷?tET0=(δ PME-NPg÷?tET0)×(PsCs÷PsCg)......(17)

As total pressure after the opening of the auditory tube, as comparing Formula 16,

PMEg (t=i?t+to)=PMEg(t=i?t)+(δPME-NPg÷?tET0 )×(PsCs÷PsCg)......(18)

There is no effect of auditory tube gas exchange in negative pressure.

Role of Middle Ear (ME) Mucosal Volume in the Regulation of ME Pressure

Stimulation upto 10 hour with close and inactive auditory tube and varying the frequency result in the ME to surrounding environment pressure gradient path as shown in the diagram. According to (Table/Fig 3) below, ME mucosal volume is directly proportional to rate in change in ME to surrounding environment pressure gradient. This is advisable showing gas loss in the ME by tans barrier exchange, and ME mucosal volume is one of the determinants.

Here, solid line (-) is 0.1 ME mucosal volume, dotted line (---) is 0.25 ME mucosal volume, and line (......) is 0.5 ME mucosal volume. This is the graph showing 10 hours of stimulation of the ME to the surrounding environment pressure gradient trajectory using a non functional AT.

Role of Trance-Barrier Exchange in the Regulation of ME Pressure

Stimulation upto 10 hours with close and inactive auditory tube and exchange across all three trans barrier paths. No trans tympanic membrane barrier exchange but ME mucosal air exchange set at standard value. Gas exchange along the membrane is also set at a standard value. The cause of ME to environment pressure gradient is given in (Table/Fig 4); an exchange between two members barrier has little effect on pressure gradient with the slight and shallow decrease in gradient. ME to environment pressure gradient results is affected on a small scale by increasing more than one path. If only one gas is exchanged, the results are negligible and will not change by changing perilymph pressure. This is a graph showing 10 hours stimulation of ME to surrounding environment pressure gradient trajectory using a non functional auditory tube and without gas exchange between different barrier paths.

Role of Perfusion Rate in Middle Ear (ME) Pressure Regulation

Stimulation upto 10 hours with close and inactive auditory tube and varying ME mucosal perfusion rate (Q). In (Table/Fig 5) ME to environment pressure gradient results at 0.02, 0.05, 0.2 and 0.5 volume/sec. Curve line of the pressure gradient is decreased at a higher perfusion rate. At a tangent, ME moles are exchanged with all chambers in a dynamic equilibrium in both liquid and gas medium. Here, Q is resident blood in volume/sec. For line (_._._) Q is 0.02; for line (.....) Q is 0.05, for solid line (_____) Q is 0.2, for line (----) Q is 0.5. This is a graph showing 10 hours of stimulation of the ME to the surrounding environment pressure gradient trajectory using a non functional auditory tube and varying ME mucosal rate.

Effect of Opening Frequency of Auditory Tube in the Regulation of Middle Ear (ME) Pressure

Changing the auditory tube opening frequency thus, stimulate the ME pressure regulation and sets the standard values of perfusion rate, auditory tube conduction rate, and auditory tube opening frequency.

In (Table/Fig 6), ME to environment pressure gradient results at a frequency of 0.0, 0.3, 1, and 2 are shown per hours. Lesser the pressure gradient higher the opening frequency because the pressure regulation gradually increases by increasing auditory tube opening frequency. Here, F is the frequency of opening of auditory tube. For line (_._._ ) F is 0, for line (----) F is 0.3 for solid line ( _____) F is 1 and for line (....... ) F is 2. This is a graph showing 10 hour stimulation of ME to surrounding environment pressure gradient trajectory using varying functional auditory tube frequency (F).

Effect of Gas Conduction through an Auditory Tube in Pressure Regulation

Changing the auditory tube conductance thus stimulates the ME pressure regulation and sets the standard values of perfusion rate, auditory tube conduction rate and auditory tube opening frequency. In (Table/Fig 7), ME to environment pressure gradient results for auditory tube conductance of 0.0, 0.2, 0.3 and 1, at constant auditory tube opening frequency. The total value of the pressure gradient decreases with increasing auditory tube conductance.

Here, FGE is a fractional gradient equilibrium in one swallow. For line (_._) FGE is 0; for line (----) FGE is 0.1; for line (....) FGE is 0.3 and for solid line (_____) FGE is 1. It is a graph of 10 hours of stimulation of the ME to the surrounding environment pressure gradient trajectory using varying functional auditory tube conductance as a fractional gradient in one swallow.

Association among Homeostasis Regulation and Agents Causing Stress in a Chamber

Stimulation for upto 10 hours with closed and inactive auditory tube and ME mucosal volume and perfusion rate controls the rate of trans-barrier exchange under the influence of pressure gradient. Regulations of ME pressure are affected by a condition that changes the rate of gas loss from ME, the rate of gas gain from ME, or both. This explains by ME pressure results assumed by standard with fixed auditory tube opening frequency (Table/Fig 8) and by changing the ME mucosal perfusion rate between 0.05-1 volume/sec.

Here, Q is the ME mucosal perfusion rate. For solid line (___) Q is 0.05, for line (---) Q is 0.1, for line (- -) Q is 0.2, for line(...) Q is 0.3, and for line (_-_), Q is 1. This is a graph showing 10 hours of stimulation of the ME to the surrounding environment pressure gradient trajectory using a functional auditory tube with a fixed frequency (F) and conductance and changing ME mucosal perfusion rate, Q.

Conclusion

To find out changes due to combined effect of fluid and pressure on ME function, both tympanometries with laser interferometry are used. After combining both fluid and pressure, there is a reduction of tympanic membrane (umbo) displacement at all hearing frequencies. More displacement of the umbo is detected when the negative pressure of fluid pressure is combined with the positive pressure. ME pressure due to combined fluid and pressure is determined by tympanometry. A formalised model in the form of mathematics was given to determine ME pressure flow regulation. Simple formulas of mathematics are used to well describe the physiology of all different models included in it.

References

1.
Doyle WJ. A formal description of middle ear pressure-regulation. Hear Res. 2017;354:73-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Sadé J, Fuchs C, Luntz M. Shrapnell membrane and mastoid pneumatization. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(6):584-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Hawkins Jr JE. Hearing. Annu Rev Physiol. 1964;26(1):453-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Mason MJ. Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. II: Inferring function from structure. J Anat. 2016;228(2):300-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Wilson JP. Mechanics of middle and inner ear. Br Med Bull. 1987;43(4):821-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Virtanen H, Marttila T. Middle-ear pressure and eustachian tube function. Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108(12):766-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Dai C, Wood MW, Gan RZ. Combined effect of fluid and pressure on middle ear function. Hear Res. 2007;236(1-2):22-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Ravicz ME, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN. Mechanisms of hearing loss resulting from middle-ear fluid. Hear Res. 2004;195(1-2):103-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Goodhill V, Holcomb AL. The relation of auditory response to the viscosity of tympanic fluids. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1958;49(1):38-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Gan RZ, Dai C, Wood MW. Laser interferometry measurements of middle ear fluid and pressure effects on sound transmission. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;120(6):3799-810. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Murakami S, Gyo K, Goode RL. Effect of middle ear pressure change on middle ear mechanics. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1997;117(3):390-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Ranade A, Lambertsen CJ, Noordergraaf A. Inert gas exchange in the middle ear. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1980;90(sup372):01-23. [crossref]
13.
Lildholdt T. Secretory otitis media. The significance of negative middle ear pressure and the results of a controlled study of ventilation tubes. Dan Med Bull. 1983;30(6):408-15.
14.
Wright HN. Hearing disorders and hearing science: Ten years of progress. J Speech Hear Res. 1970;13(2):229-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Alper CM, Seroky JT, Tabari R, Doyle WJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the development of otitis media with effusion caused by functional obstruction of the eustachian tube. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;106(5):422-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Fierloos IN, Windhorst DA, Fang Y, Mao Y, Crone MR, Hosman CM, et al. Factors associated with media use for parenting information: A cross-sectional study among parents of children aged 0-8 years. Nurs Open. 2022;9(1):446-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Swarts JD, Alper CM, Chan KH, Seroky JT, Doyle WJ. In vivo observation with magnetic resonance imaging of middle ear effusion in response to experimental underpressures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995;104(7):522-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Roland PS, Finitzo T, Friel-Patti S, Brown KC, Stephens KT, Brown O, et al. Otitis media: Incidence, duration, and hearing status. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1989;115(9):1049-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Dobie RA, Berlin CI. Influence of otitis media on hearing and development. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1979;88(5_suppl):48-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Bluestone CD, Klein JO. Otitis media in infants and children. PMPH-USA; 2007.
21.
Kitahara M, Kodama A, Ozawa H, Izukura H, Inoue S. Test for pressure control capacity of the Eustachian tube. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1994;114(sup510):96-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Bluestone MB. Eustachian tube: Structure, function, role in otitis media. PMPH- USA; 2005.
23.
Rood SR, Doyle WJ. Morphology of tensor veli palatini, tensor tympani, and dilatator tubae muscles. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1978;87(2):202-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Cantekin EI, Doyle WJ, Phillips DC, Reichert TJ, Bluestone CD. Dilation of the eustachian tube by electrical stimulation of the mandibular nerve. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1979;88(1):40-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Cantekin EI, Bluestone CD, Saez CA, Bern SA. Airflow through the eustachian tube. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1979;88(5):603-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Doyle WJ, Swarts JD, Banks J, Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Alper CM. Sensitivity and specificity of eustachian tube function tests in adults. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2013;139(7):719-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Piper J. Measurement of the gas-exchanging function of the lung: Revision of concepts, quantities and units in gas-exchange physiology. SAGE Publications; 1973.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60719.17632

Date of Submission: Oct 11, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 19, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 15, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 12, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 01, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 13, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com