Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 123675

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : BC01 - BC04 Full Version

Neonatal Screening for Congenital Hypothyroidism through Dried Blood Spots: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI:
Vipin Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Ankur Singh, Kiran Giri, Kamlesh Palandurkar

1. Junior Resident, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kamlesh Palandurkar,
Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.


Introduction: Congenital Hypothyroidism (CH) is defined as the partial or complete loss of thyroid gland function present at birth. During the first 2-3 years of life, thyroid hormone plays a crucial role in brain development. If a baby is born with a deficiency of thyroid hormone (CH) and is not diagnosed and treated appropriately, it can lead to intellectual disability and growth retardation in the affected child.

Aim: To screen newborns for CH using Dried Blood Spot (DBS) sampling. Additionally, the study aimed to compare mean TSH values between two comparison groups based on gender, birth weight, gestational age, and type of delivery.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India, from November 2021 to October 2022. A total of 250 live-birth newborns delivered either by Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (SVD) or Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent from their parents. Blood samples were obtained on DBS cards through heel prick in all newborns. TSH levels were assessed using a neonatal TSH sandwich ELISA kit. The cut-off value of TSH to label as screen positive was set at >20 mIU/L. A two-tailed Independent t-test was performed to compare mean TSH values between the two comparison groups based on gender, birth weight, gestational age, and type of delivery.

Results: Out of the 250 babies, 137 (54.8%) were male and 113 (45.2%) were female. The gestational age ranged from a minimum of 29 weeks to a maximum of 41 weeks in both male and female babies. TSH levels in male babies ranged from 0.16 mIU/L to 10.27 mIU/L, with a mean value of 3.98±2.16 mIU/L. TSH levels were below 20 mIU/L in all 250 newborns, indicating negative screening results for CH in all the neonates.

Conclusion: The results concluded that the serum levels of TSH obtained through heel prick were not statistically significant in both term and preterm newborns, as well as in Normal Birth Weight (NBW) and Low Birth Weight (LBW) newborns. Furthermore, there was no significant difference based on the type of delivery (SVD/LSCS) or the gender of the newborn (male or female).


Growth retardation, Newborn screening, Thyroid, Thyroid stimulating hormone

Hypothyroidism is defined as a deficiency in thyroid hormone production or secretion, resulting in a variety of clinical signs and symptoms of hypometabolism. This leads to insufficient metabolic and neurological effects at the cellular level (1). The thyroid gland, a butterfly-shaped organ situated at the front of the neck, produces thyroid hormone and calcitonin. It plays an important role in the regulation of metabolism, growth, and serum concentrations of electrolytes such as calcium (2),(3). The term CH is used when thyroid hormone deficiency is present at birth. CH is the most common congenital endocrine disorder in childhood and is also the leading cause of intellectual disability, which can be prevented through early diagnosis and prompt treatment (4).

CH most commonly occurs when the thyroid gland does not develop properly, a condition known as thyroid dysgenesis. This can be due to agenesis (missing thyroid gland), hypoplasia (underdeveloped thyroid), or ectopia (thyroid located in the wrong part of the neck) (5). In some cases, the gland is formed properly but does not produce hormones correctly, a condition known as dyshormonogenesis (6). The prevalence of CH varies worldwide, with lower rates observed in Western countries (1 in 3000-4000) compared to higher rates in Asian populations (1 in 1200-2000) (7),(8),(9). In India, the reported prevalence of CH differs across regions, such as Chandigarh (1 in 3400), Hyderabad (1 in 1700), Lucknow (1 in 1221), and Chennai (1.6 in 1000) (9),(10),(11),(12). This regional variation may be attributed to differences in screening strategies or the use of different cut-offs to identify screen-positive cases (9),(10),(13),(14).

During the first trimester and early phase of the second trimester, the foetus relies on the transplacental transfer of maternal thyroid hormone since it is not yet able to produce thyroid hormone. The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis in the foetus begins functioning at 16-20 weeks of gestation and becomes fully mature at term. Inadequate secretion of thyroid hormones during this period can greatly impair the growth and maturation of the brain, both before and after birth, leading to intellectual deficits and neurological impairments (6). Due to the absence of prominent clinical features at birth, many newborns with CH go undiagnosed and later develop mental retardation. Wilson JMG and Jungner F outlined the selection criteria for including a thyroid disorder in a Newborn Screening (NBS) program (15).

CH fulfills all the criteria given by Wilson JMG and Jungner F, as it is easy to screen, can be assessed before symptoms manifest through definitive diagnostic tests, is inexpensive, and affected children have excellent outcomes when treated in a timely manner. The European Society of Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the Indian Society of Paediatric and Adult Endocrinology (ISPAE) have suggested that the aim of neonatal screening programs should be to detect all forms of primary hypothyroidism. Primary TSH screening is more sensitive and specific than T4 screening for the diagnosis of primary CH. It should be noted that central CH (with an incidence of 1 in 13,000) cannot be detected through primary TSH screening, but the detection of this rare disorder is not the target of NBS (7).

One advantage of using DBS testing compared to conventional venepuncture is that only a small quantity of blood is required for DBS testing (approximately 50 μL, equivalent to one drop of capillary blood). This minimal blood volume requirement is particularly important in paediatric diagnostics. DBS cards can be preserved for long periods with almost no degradation of the analytes (16),(17),(18).

Several state-level NBS programs have been initiated, including the Chandigarh Program initiated in 2007 (19), the Kerala State NBS program, and the Goa State NBS Program (20). However, a national NBS program is yet to be initiated in India. Early diagnosis of CH and prompt treatment within a few weeks (preferably within one week) can prevent irreversible brain damage and result in normal neurodevelopmental outcomes for babies born with CH. Additionally, early diagnosis and treatment can reduce the number of cases of cretinism, a condition characterised by severe physical and mental growth subnormality due to untreated CH.

Hence, the present study was conducted to screen newborns for CH using DBS sampling.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India, over a period of one year from November 2021 to October 2022. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), IMS BHU Varanasi, in Ethics Committee (vide letter No 2947 dated 29.10.2021).

Inclusion criteria: All live birth newborns delivered either by SVD or LSCS after 72 hours of birth were evaluated and enrolled in the study after obtaining written informed consent from their parents.

Exclusion criteria: Parents of newborn who refused consent and cases of foetal demise were excluded from the study.

Sample size: All neonates delivered within the study duration and meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study.

Sample collection: Blood samples were collected on DBS cards through heel prick. The samples were collected from the Paediatrics Department and processed in the Department of Biochemistry, IMS BHU. The NBS Card has five circles, and this portion of the card is used for collection blood from the enrolled neonates. Blood samples were obtained by heel-prick on Whatman filter paper 903. Atleast three (preferably five) blood spots were collected from each neonate. The blood sample was collected in such a way that the circle was completely filled and the blood was evenly distributed on the filter paper. The filter paper was properly dried either by air drying at room temperature or in an incubator at 37°C.

Drying was done for atleast four hours. If the testing was not conducted on the same day, the DBS cards were stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. For longer durations, they were stored at -20°C. FDA-approved surgical lancets with a maximum tip length of 2.4 mm, marketed by Perkin Elmer, were used for this study.

To avoid calcaneal puncture and the risk of osteochondritis, heel puncture was performed on the most medial or lateral portion of the plantar surface. This also reduces the risk of injury to blood vessels and nerves.

Estimation of TSH: A neonatal TSH screening ELISA kit from Zentech Belgium was used for the quantitative estimation of thyroid stimulating hormone in dried blood samples collected on filter paper. The ROBONIK Read well Touch Elisa Plate Analyser, which has four filters, was used for plate reading. The recommended cut-off value for TSH was >20 mIU/L to classify as screen positive (12).

Principle of the assay: The neonatal TSH screening ELISA is an enzyme immunoassay used for the quantitative estimation of TSH in dried blood samples. It is a type of sandwich ELISA. Strips are coated with an anti-TSH antibody that captures TSH present in the sample. After incubation and a washing step to remove unbound material, a monoclonal antibody anti-TSH conjugated to Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) is added and allowed to bind to 2TSH. After a second incubation and washing, the immunocomplex is detected by the reduction of Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) by HRP. The development of the blue colour is directly proportional to the amount of antigen in the sample or standard. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.5 M sulfuric acid, and absorbance was read at 450 nm using the ROBONIK Read well Touch, which consists of an ELISA reader with four filters.

Four comparison groups were created based on gender, birth weight, gestational age, and type of delivery:

- Gender of child: Male (M) or Female (F)
- Gestational age: Preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) or Term (gestational age ≥37 weeks)
- Birth weight: Low birth weight (LBW, birth weight <2.5 kg) and Normal birth weight (NBW, birth weight ≥2.5 kg)
- Type of delivery: SVD or LSCS

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism statistical software. A two-tailed independent t-test was conducted to compare the mean TSH values between two groups. If the p-value <0.05, the difference between the two means was considered statistically significant.


A total of 250 samples were collected on DBS cards using a heel prick for the quantitative estimation of TSH values. None of the babies screened positive for CH as their TSH levels were <20 mIU/L. Among the 250 babies, 137 (54.8%) were male and 113 (45.2%) were female (Table/Fig 1).

The values of TSH in female babies ranged from 0.07 mIU/L to 11.79 mIU/L, while in male babies it ranged from 0.16 mIU/L to 10.27 mIU/L. The mean value of TSH in male children was 3.98, and in female children, it was 3.95.

Approximately 99% of the neonates had TSH values below 10 mIU/L, with the maximum values of TSH ranging between 2-4 mIU/L (Table/Fig 2).

Among the 250 neonates, 156 (62.4%) had NBW, and 94 (37.6%) were LBW babies. The mean value of TSH in LBW babies was 4.18, and in NBW babies, it was 3.84. The percentage of newborns delivered at term was 175 (70%). Out of them, 82 were females and 93 were males, with TSH values of 3.76±2.21 mIU/L and 4.07±2.27 mIU/L, respectively.

The mean value of TSH was found to be higher in preterm babies (4.06) than in term babies (3.93), but this difference was not statistically significant. Out of the 250 babies, 158 were born by LSCS (63.2%), and the remaining 92 were born by SVD (36.8%). The mean value of TSH in babies born by LSCS was 3.84, and in babies born by SVD, it was 4.19. There was no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of their TSH values, as the p-value was 0.2061. In categories such as low birth weight babies and preterm babies, the mean value of TSH was higher than in normal weight and term babies. However, when comparing both groups, the difference was not found to be statistically significant, as the p-value was >0.05 (Table/Fig 3).


Before the initiation of the NBS program, the diagnosis of CH relied on clinical presentation, including symptoms and signs of CH. Generally, symptoms in babies born with CH do not appear early due to the transplacental transfer of maternal thyroid hormone thyroxin (T4). This can result in the child going undiagnosed, leading to a delay in treatment initiation, which can cause irreversible brain injury. It has been observed that patients diagnosed through NBS have better outcomes compared to those diagnosed clinically based on signs and symptoms (21),(22),(23),(24). In India, the first-time screening for CH was initiated at BJ Wadia Hospital in Mumbai in 1982, using cord blood samples taken immediately after the baby’s delivery (25),(26).

The most important goal of CH screening programs is early diagnosis and prompt treatment initiation, ideally within the first month. After birth, there is a temporary elevation in TSH levels due to physiological neonatal surge, which remains elevated for the first 2-3 days of life. If sampling is done during this period, falsely elevated TSH values may be obtained. Therefore, the ideal time for sampling through a heel prick is after 72 hours of life (12). In present study, samples were collected from 250 babies (≥72 hours after birth) on DBS cards using a heel prick, and CH screening was performed by estimating TSH levels. None of the babies had a TSH value higher than 20 mIU/L, indicating that all babies were screened negative for CH.

The data in present study shows similar values in both males and females, which was consistent with a study by Adele BC et al., that also demonstrated that no sex-based cut-off is required for CH screening in newborns (27). When TSH levels were examined according to gestational age and birth weight, our study found higher mean TSH values in preterm and LBW babies. However, this result contradicts previous study done by Arasar T et al., (28) which showed higher mean TSH level in normal weight babies and study done by Adele BC et al., (27) which showed higher mean TSH level in full term babies. Nevertheless, in both studies, the differences were not statistically significant, suggesting that birth weight and gestational age may not warrant a change in the cut-off for CH screening.

In present study, the mean TSH level was lower in babies delivered by LSCS compared to those born by SVD which contradicts the findings of Adele BC et al., who reported higher mean TSH values in babies born by LSCS (28). Transient TSH elevation, known as atypical hypothyroidism, can occur in some cases, particularly in preterm and low birth weight babies. It is commonly observed between 2-6 weeks of age and often resolves by 6-10 weeks of age. Cases like delayed TSH surge might have been missed in present study as preterm and LBW babies should undergo a second screening test two weeks after the first screening or at the age of two weeks, as there is a risk of delayed TSH rise in these babies (29). A comparison of the findings in present study with contrasting studies is shown in (Table/Fig 4) (27),(28),(30),(31).

During pregnancy, maternal total or bound thyroid hormone levels increase due to the serum concentration of thyroid-binding globulin, and TSH levels decrease in early pregnancy (first 12 weeks of gestation) due to weak stimulation of TSH receptors caused by human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG). This stimulates thyroid hormone secretion, leading to increased serum free thyroxine (T4) levels, which in turn suppress hypothalamic thyrotropin-releasing hormone and limit pituitary TSH secretion. In the later stages of pregnancy, TSH levels return to normal and progressively increase in the third trimester due to placental growth and production of placental deiodinase. These physiological changes are responsible for the decrease in TSH levels in newborns and the improvement in gestation and growth parameters later in life (31).


A limitation of present study was the small sample size, which could affect the generalisability of the results. Additionally, important factors such as the maternal history of thyroid illness, presence of any chronic illness, and history of drug intake by the mother that could potentially alter thyroid function in babies were not included in the study.


Heel prick samples demonstrate good consistency, and mean TSH values vary among different comparison groups based on gender, gestational age, birth weight, and mode of delivery. However, these differences were not statistically significant in present study. Therefore, it is feasible to use the same cut-off for screening babies in these comparison groups. Nevertheless, further extensive studies with larger sample sizes are needed, and it is important to include maternal factors such as the presence of thyroid or chronic illness and the history of maternal drug intake that could potentially affect the thyroid status of newborns. In the case of premature babies, a second screening should also be conducted, as cases of delayed TSH surge can be missed by the first screening alone, as may have been the case in present study.


Diaz A, Lipman Diaz EG. Hypothyroidism. Pediatr Rev. 2014;35(8):336-47; quiz348-9.10.1542/pir.35-8-336. [crossref][PubMed]
Ilahi A, Muco E, Ilahi TB. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 11, 2021. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Parathyroid.
Fitzpatrick TH, Siccardi MA. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Apr 5, 2022. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Adam's Apple.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Susan R. Rose, and the Section on Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Rosalind S. Brown, and the Public Health Committee and Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society. Update of Newborn Screening and Therapy for Congenital Hypothyroidism. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2290-303. https://doi. org/10.1542/peds.2006-0915 [crossref][PubMed]
Castanet M, Polak M, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Lyonnet S, Czernichow P, Léger J. Nineteen years of national screening for congenital hypothyroidism: Familial cases with thyroid dysgenesis suggest the involvement of genetic factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(5):2009-14. [crossref][PubMed]
Bowden SA, Goldis M. Congenital Hypothyroidism. [Updated 2023 Feb 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from:
Ford G, LaFranchi SH. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: A worldwide view of strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;28(2):175-87. [crossref][PubMed]
Chen C Y, Lee K T, Lee CT C, Lai W T, Huang Y B. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of congenital hypothyroidism in an Asian population: A nationwide population based study. J Epidemiol. 2013;23(2):85-94. [crossref][PubMed]
Afroze B, Humayun KN, Qadir M. Newborn screening in Pakistan Lessons from a hospital based congenital hypothyroidism screening programme. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008;37(12 Suppl):114-13.
Kaur G, Srivastav J, Jain S, Chawla D, Chavan BS, Atwal R, et al. Preliminary report on neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: A Chandigarh experience. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77(9):969-73. [crossref][PubMed]
Devi ARR, Naushad SM. Newborn screening in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71(2):157-60. [crossref][PubMed]
Desai MP, Sharma R, Riaz I, Sudhanshu S, Parikh R, Bhatia V. Newborn screening guidelines for congenital hypothyroidism in India: Recommendations of the Indian Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology (ISPAE) Part I: Screening and confirmation of diagnosis. Indian J Pediatr. 2018;85(6):440-47. [crossref][PubMed]
Saleh DS, Lawrence S, Geraghty MT, Gallego PH, McAssey K, Wherrett DK, et al. Prediction of congenital hypothyroidism based on initial screening thyroid stimulating hormone. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:24. [crossref][PubMed]
Lott JA, Sardovia Iyer M, Speakman KS, Lee KK. Age dependent cut-off values in screening newborns for hypothyroidism. Clin Biochem. 2004;37(9):791-97. [crossref][PubMed]
Wilson JMG, Jungner F. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health. 1968;34, WHO, Geneva.
Mei J, Lee MS. Dried blood spots sample collection, storage, and transportation. In: Li W, Lee MS, editors. Dried blood spots. Applications and techniques. Hoboken: Wiley; 2014. pp. 21–31. [crossref]
Hannon WH, Therell BL. Overview of the history and applications of dried blood spot samples. In: Li W, Lee MS, editors. Dried blood spots. Applications and techniques. Vol. 3. Hoboken: Wiley; 2014. pp. 3–15. [crossref]
Chapman OD. The complement-fixation test for syphilis. Use of patient's whole blood dried on filter paper. Arch Derm Syphilol. 1924;9(5):607-11. Available from: Article id=495323. [crossref]
Kaur G, Srivastav S, Jain S, Chawla D, Chavan BS, Atwal R, et al. Preliminary report on neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and glucose6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: A Chandigarh experience. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77(9):969-73. [crossref][PubMed]
Government of Goa. Screening of Newborn Babies for Inborn Errors. Agreement Between Governor of Goa and Neogen Labs. Panaji, India: Government of Goa; 2008.
Landau YE, Waisbren SE, Chan LM, Levy H. Long-term outcome of expanded newborn screening at Boston children’s hospital: Benefits and challenges in defining true disease. JIMD. 2017;40(2):209-18. [crossref][PubMed]
Wilcken B, Haas M, Joy P, Wiley V, Bowling F, Carpenter K, et al. Expanded newborn screening: Outcome in screened and unscreened patients at age 6 years. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):e242-48. [crossref][PubMed]
Hinton CF, Mai CT, Nabukera SK, Botto LD, Feuchtbaum L, Romitti PA, et al. Developing a public health-tracking system for follow-up of newborn screening metabolic conditions: A four-state pilot project structure and initial findings. Genet Med. 2013;16(6):484-90. [crossref][PubMed]
Linder M, Gramer G, Harge G, Fang-Hoffmann J, Schwab KO, Tacke U, et al. Efficacy and outcome of expanded newborn screening for metabolic diseases-report of 10 years from South West Germany. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:44. [crossref][PubMed]
Colaco MP, Desai MP, Ajgaonkar AR. Neonatal screening for hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr. 1984;21(9):695-700.
Desai MP, Upadhye P, Colaco MP. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism using the filter paper thyroxine technique. Indian J Med Res. 1994;100:36-42.
Adele BC, Mungyeh ME, Suzanne NUS, Alkali YS, Agwu C, et al. Newborn thyroid stimulating hormone levels in heel prick blood at the yaounde gyneco-obstetric and paediatric hospital cameroon. Endocrinol Metab Syndr. 2018;7:287. Doi:10.4172/2161-1017.1000287. [crossref]
Arasar T, Ganesh J, Padmanaban S. Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in a tertiary care centre. Int J Contemp Pediat 2016;3(2):456- 60.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20160651.
Desai MP. Congenital hypothyroidism: Screening dilemma. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16 Suppl 2:S153-55. [crossref][PubMed]
Gopalakrishnan V, Joshi K, Phadke S. Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism, galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency in Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51(9):701-05. [crossref][PubMed]
Verma NR, Naik G, Patel S. A detailed observational study of maternal and neonatal variables affecting the thyroid-stimulating hormone levels in neonates. Egypt Pediatric Association Gaz. 2021;69:36.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65497.18618

Date of Submission: May 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 14, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 27, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: I.O.E. BHU as funding agency.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 22, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 23, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)