Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 149337

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : January | Volume : 17 | Issue : 1 | Page : SC34 - SC37 Full Version

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Children Visiting a Tertiary Hospital in Himachal Pradesh, India


Published: January 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59945.17429
Pancham Kumar, Mohit Bajaj, Ambika Sood, Anjula, Rakesh Sharma, Raju Katoch, Ankit Chaudhary

1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, DR. RPGMC, Tanda at Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, rkmv, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. 7. Senior Resident, Department of PSM, DR. RPGMC, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mohit Bajaj,
Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. rpgmc, Tanda at Kangra, Himachal Pradesh-176001, India.
E-mail: tandian427@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Research on Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) seroprevalence in children and adolescent population across the globe is quite limited. In India, there is a dearth of data on COVID-19 seropositivity, especially in unvaccinated paediatric population, particularly in the Himalayan region.

Aim: To estimate the seroprevalence of COVID-19 in children presenting in a tertiary care health institution.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional serosurvey was conducted on 500 children, from October 2021 to March 2022 in paediatric age group, attending Indira Gandhi Medical College Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India, for various health related concerns such as fever, cough, loose stools, vomiting and fast breathing using convenience sampling. Socio-demographic profile was recorded and blood sample was drawn for COVID-19 antibody titre estimation. Chi-squared and Fisher’s-exact tests for proportions was used for testing statistical significance.

Results: A total of 500 children, age ranged from 12 hours to 17 years 7 months were enrolled with maximum children belonging to 01-05 years age group and there was slight male preponderance. Seropositivity in males (27.3%) was significantly higher than females (8.3%). Highest (42.3%) seropositivity was seen in age group of 06 months to 01 year. About 10.8% of cases were positive for Immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody, 4.4% were positive for IgM antibody, while about 6.6% cases were positive for both antibodies.

Conclusion: The seroprevalence status of children and adolescents is quite low in this region, revealing the high susceptibility of children to SARS-CoV-2 in the study region. It further emphasises benefits of serological testing in children for SARS-CoV-2 as well as the need of safe and effective vaccination for the unimmunised, unprotected and vulnerable paediatric age group.

Keywords

Antibody, Children, Northern India, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been a global public health problem and had brought down globe to an absolute stand-still. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” in 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infected nearly 200 million and killed more than 04 million people worldwide, causing massive disruptions to daily life and manifold economic losses (1),(2),(3). In order to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and to curb paediatric morbidity and mortality, the schools nationwide were closed for in-person teaching and classes were moved to online mode in March 2020 (4),(5). Despite all preventive measures, the infection transmission can never be eliminated completely. The paediatric infection rates and the true level of natural immunity in children are still unknown yet, and especially the region-specific data is lacking (6),(7).

Moreover, the role of children in SARS-CoV-2 transmission has been a major area of concern (7),(8). As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for children 12 years and below were not approved until late 2021, knowing infection rates in children seemed even more important, in order to implement protective measures to limit infection. Children typically experience mild COVID-19 illness and are more likely to have asymptomatic infections, allowing them to unknowingly transmit SARS-CoV-2 (8). With the rate of asymptomatic infections estimated to be as high as 50%, estimating true infection rates remains a challenge (9),(10). Although nucleic acid testing can identify active SARS-CoV-2 cases, most infections clear within two weeks and leave asymptomatic cases undocumented (10),(11). Antibodies generated against previous infections can last for months to years and the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in blood indicate that a person was infected at some point in the past (11),(12). Serological studies can identify asymptomatic and symptomatic cases and more accurately estimate number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the absence of known vaccination status (9),(10),(11),(12).

The evidence on seropositivity in children and adolescent populations from all over the world as well as India is still evolving, especially in the unvaccinated population. Moreover, no research had been conducted on paediatric seroprevalence in Himachal Pradesh and there was dearth of region-specific data. This present hospital-based research was conducted to fulfil this major knowledge gap and estimate the seroprevalence of COVID-19 among paediatric age group; simultaneously providing an insight into the proportion of susceptible population amongst the young.

Material and Methods

The present study was a hospital-based observational cross-sectional serosurvey to estimate the prevalence of seropositivity against COVID-19 in children (0-18 years), who attended the Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India, a tertiary care health institution for various health concerns, between October 2021 and March 2022 (06 months). Prior permission was taken from Institute Ethical Committee (Letter No. IGMC/HFW(MC-II) B (12) ETHICS/2022/3684, Dated 23.08.2022) to go ahead with the study. Institutional identifiers were omitted in order to maintain confidentiality and anonymity.

Inclusion criteria: Every alternate child/adolescent attending the outdoor department or admitted in the paediatric indoor facility during the study period, whose caretakers consented for the study were recruited in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All those children and guardians, denying consent were not enrolled in the study.

Every alternate child/adolescent fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited in the study,utilising convenience sampling technique, making a total of 500 study participants.

Study Procedure

A study tool was devised for collecting the relevant information for the research. It consisted of a semi-structured proforma comprising of both open and closed questions intended to collect information pertaining to socio-demographic parameters and awareness on personal protection measures.

The blood sample (05 mL) was collected using standard aseptic technique for the assessment of antibodies (IgG and IgM) against COVID-19. Serum was separated immediately and samples were stored in a deep freezer at -20°C. Serum samples were analysed for the estimation of IgG and IgM (anti-spike) antibody titres against COVID-19 virus in the immunohaematology laboratory of the institute. Quantitative estimation of IgG and IgM levels against COVID-19 virus was done using Immunoassay technique by the Department of Immunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine IGMC Shimla. Immunoassay kits (Dia Pro Diagnostic Bio probes Sesto San Giovanni Milano) were having 98% sensitivity and 98% specificity. Data was collected for serological status of enrolled cases for antibodies and their quantitative estimation. Titres of IgG and/or IgM antibodies were measured; IgG and IgM titres above 0.9 were taken as positive for COVID-19 serology. Positive serology was taken when IgG or IgM levels or both were above normal range (11).

Statistical Analysis

The data on demography, serological status, COVID-19 appropriate behaviour and vaccine status of caregivers of children enrolled was tabulated in Microsoft Excel sheet and processed and analysed with Epi Info (Epidemiological Information) version 7.2 with relevant statistical tests of significance. The qualitative data was presented as proportions as Chi-squared and Fisher’s-exact tests for proportions was used for statistical significance testing; two tailed p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Total 500 children/adolescents were enrolled in the study with age ranged from 12 hours to 17 years 7 months. About 54.2% of the enrolled participants were males. About 54 (10.8%) participants had tested positive for IgG with mean titre of 1.58±0.58, 72 (14.4%) had tested positive for IgM with mean titre of 2.07±0.71, 33 (6.6%) had tested for both IgG and IgM antibodies; therefore, a total of 93 (18.6%) of children had tested positive for COVID-19. Seropositivity in the males (27.3%) was significantly higher than females (8.3%).

(Table/Fig 1) shows the gender, locality distribution and COVID-19 appropriate behaviour of seropositive cases. Total seropositivity for any antibody was observed to be 18.6%. For IgG, IgM and both IgG and IgM; the seropositivity was 4.2%, 7.8% and 6.6%, respectively. Except for both IgG and IgM; the difference between males and females was found to be statistically significant. The overall seropositivity for urban and rural areas was 22.5% and 17.9%; however, there were no statistically significant differences in seropositivity based on residential locality. Barring social distancing measures, other COVID-19 appropriate preventive behaviours did not have statistically significant effect on extent of seropositivity.

As shown in (Table/Fig 2), maximum number of the children as well as antibodies positivity characterstic, corresponds to age group of 01-05 years. Highest (42.3%) seropositivity was seen in age group of 06 months to 01 year. (Table/Fig 3) shows the district-wise comparison of seropositivity. The highest number of cases was from Shimla district (54/291, 18.5%), while the highest seropositivity was seen in Bilaspur (11/27 patients, 40.7%); three districts had no patient admitted or referred to the institution. Only two of the enrolled children had family history of COVID-19 infection, but it was not associated with mortality. None of the caregivers/cases reported any history of febrile illness in the last three months. The immunisation coverage was relatively good in parents/caregivers of enrolled cases. Males (66.6%) had higher vaccination coverage of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine as compared to the females (48.8%).

Discussion

To date limited studies have been undertaken in paediatric population infected with SARS-CoV-2; though children usually are asymptomatic or have a milder form of infection with equivalent transmissibility (13),(14),(15). The present study is one of the few studies conducted in Northern region of the country and was undertaken when immunisation for children had not yet started. In a China-based study, about 1% of children (<10 years) were found positive among 44,762 confirmed COVID-19 cases (16). In another study, only 0.5% (0-4 years) and 1.3% (5-17 years) of children tested positive at public health laboratories in the United States (17). These studies specified lower prevalence of disease as well as severity of common symptoms in children compared to adults. Presently, there is only in-vitro evidence of low SARS-CoV-2-specific Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 receptors in children by the possibility of an active immune system and pre-existing antibodies against other viral infections in children (18),(19). Additionally, the SARS-CoV-2 sample collection method and type of specimens collected from children are other concerns as viral load may vary significantly. Furthermore, pathogenesis and transmissibility of COVID-19 may also differ in children and adults. Responsible factors for these differences include a low number of ACE2 receptors in children, a less mature enzyme against SARS-CoV-2 variants and presence of low inflammatory cytokines, which undergo substantial changes in adulthood. However, high levels of procalcitonin and interleukin-6 have been previously reported in COVID-19 positive children (18),(19).

Overall, 93 (18.6%) participants of study population were found seropositive for COVID-19 antibody; meaning a significant 81.4% of the paediatric population was susceptible to COVID-19; the results were similar to a South Indian study where 19.6% prevalence was reported in the age group of 01 month to 17 years (13), and study by Misra P et al., where higher seropositivity of 62.3% was documented (20). Seropositivity in the males was significantly higher as compared to females, which could be due to the fact that the males are more exposed as they are more mobile due to social and economic reasons. None of the newborns had tested positive for COVID-19 serology. Although not statistically significant, the present survey showed that the seropositivity among the rural population was slightly lower as compared to the urban population; this fact can be explained as social distancing is more natural in rural areas. Interestingly, the history of COVID-19 in the study participants and their caregivers was lacking. Only two of the cases had positive family history of COVID-19 infection in the past.

There was no history of any COVID-19 associated mortality in the families of the study population. None of the caregivers/cases reported had history of any febrile illness in last three months; suggesting subclinical or overlooked mild COVID-19 illness. The major challenge is thus to identify asymptomatic cases especially in children and older adults. Though, in various studies, few cases of symptomatic children with SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies showed negative RT-PCR test (21). The behaviour regarding prevention of transmission of COVID-19 such as the use of mask was seen almost universally in the study population, while the concept of hand washing and social distancing was lacking in quarter to one-third of population studied. The prevalence of seropositivity was higher in the group which did not observe the COVID-19 appropriate behaviour (particularly social distancing); further justifying universally advocated COVID-19 appropriate behaviour and preventive measures. All these observations cement the need of practicing personal protective measures for prevention of diseases with high communicability. Moreover, despite having infection, most of the children remained asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic; this further strengthened the need of early vaccination for the paediatric age group. In addition, in future, a possibility of COVID-19/Long COVID/Post-COVID should also be kept for children as the disease may present with vague symptoms and complications.

Limitation(s)

As it was a hospital-based study with a small sample size, possibility of compromised estimation of seropositivity cannot be denied.

Conclusion

The study provides an insight into the proportion of children affected in the region of Shimla city which was once the hotbed of COVID-19. The results provide evidence that seroprevalence status of children and adolescents is quite low in the region, revealing high susceptibility of children to SARS-CoV-2. The findings also support the observation that children experience fewer and milder symptoms of infection which may often go unrecognised, warranting serological testing in children. Lastly, as the natural infection has shown a limited seroconversion as well as protection from infection, study justifies the need of strategic and effective vaccination for paediatric infection. In addition, it will be pertinent to continue monitoring of serological status of children especially in community, particularly in context of the introduction of vaccine in paediatric population as it will give us a good insight into postvaccination seroconversion.

References

1.
World Health Organization. [Internet] Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. [Cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Internet] COVID Data Tracker. [Cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home.
3.
Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):929-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Jean-Baptiste CO, Herring RP, Beeson WL, Dos Santos H, Banta JE. Stressful life events and social capital during the early phase of COVID-19 in the U.S. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2020;2(1):100057. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Bayham J, Fenichel EP. Impact of school closures for COVID-19 on the US health-care workforce and net mortality: A modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(5):e271-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Hobbs CV, Drobeniuc J, Kittle T, Williams J, Byers P, Satheshkumar PS, et al. Estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among persons aged <18 years-Mississippi, May-September 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(9):312-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Bajema KL, Wiegand RE, Cuffe K, Patel SV, Iachan R, Lim T, et al. Estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the US as of September 2020. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(4):450-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Paediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20200702. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Oran DP, Topol EJ. Prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(5):362-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Oran DP, Topol EJ. The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections that are asymptomatic: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(5):655-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Internet]. COVID-19 Testing. [Cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/testing/index.html.
12.
Havers FP, Reed C, Lim T, Montgomery JM, Klena JD, Hall AJ, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 sites in the United States, March 23-May 12, 2020. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(12):1576-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Venkataraman A, Balasubramanian S, Putilibai S, Lakshan RS, Amperayani S, Senthilnathan S, et al. Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 serology and clinical phenotype amongst hospitalised children in a tertiary children’s hospital in India. J Trop Paediatr. 2021;67(1):01-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Wei M, Yuan J, Liu Y, Fu T, Yu X, Zhang ZJ. Novel coronavirus infection in hospitalized infants under 1 year of age in China. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1313-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Adeyinka A, Bailey K, Pierre L, Kondamudi N. COVID 19 infection: Paediatric perspectives. JACEP Open. 2021;2(1):e12375. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Lee PI, Hu YL, Chen PY, Huang YC, Hsueh PR. Are children less susceptible to COVID-19? J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;53(3):371-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Felsenstein S, Hedrich CM. SARS-CoV-2 infections in children and young people. Clin Immunol. 2020;220:108588. Doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108588. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Steinman JB, Lum FM, Ho PP, Kaminski N, Steinman L. Reduced development of COVID-19 in children reveals molecular checkpoints gating pathogenesis illuminating potential therapeutics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(40):24620-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Misra P, Kant S, Guleria R, Rai SK, Kishore S, Baidya S, et al. Serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody among children and young age group (between 2 and 17 years) in India: An interim result from a large multicentric population-based sero-epidemiological study. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2022;11(6):2816-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Tosif S, Neeland MR, Sutton P, Licciardi PV, Sarkar S, Selva KJ, et al. Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in three children of parents with symptomatic COVID- 19. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):5703. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59945.17429

Date of Submission: Aug 30, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 06, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: Funded by Intramural grant (sponsored by Government of Himachal Pradesh, India).
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 12, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 25, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 04, 2022 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com