Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 96379

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : AD01 - AD02 Full Version

A Rare Presentation of Subhepatic Caecum and Appendix with Atrophic Gall Bladder in a Cadaver


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59360.17390
Anasuya Ghosh, Arpita Sarkar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, AIIMS, Kalyani, West Bengal, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, JIMS, Budge Budge, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Anasuya Ghosh,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institution of Medical Sciences, (AIIMS Kalyani), NH-34 Connector, Basantpur, Saguna, Kalyani-741245, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: dranasuya7@gmail.com

Abstract

A case of subhepatic, mobile caecum and appendix was found in a 65-year-old male cadaver. The appendix was attached to the right wall of caecum, in addition, a small and atrophic gall bladder, only 1.5 cm in length, was noted in the fossa for gall bladder of liver, connected to the right colic flexure by a cystocolic peritoneal band. The case was found during the routine dissection for the undergraduate medical students. This kind of finding has not been reported in any previous literature associated with subhepatic caecum. This unusual position of appendix might cause atypical sign and symptoms during episode of acute appendicitis. This might affect the gall bladder, located in close vicinity, leading to inflammation, atrophy and adhesion to the adjacent right colic flexure. This type of case might cause diagnostic and management challenges for the clinicians and complicated disease conditions in the patients.

Keywords

Appendicitis, Cholecystitis, Dissection, Malrotation

Case Report

A 65-year-old male cadaver was dissected in the Department of Anatomy, AIIMS, Kalyani for the first year MBBS students. An unusual position of caecum and appendix and unusual appearance of gall bladder (formalin fixed) was noted in the cadaver. The cause of death was obtained from the records, however, could not clearly show any association with the reported condition.

The abdominal cavity was dissected during routine practical classes for the MBBS First year students. It was found that caecum and appendix were located in right hypochondrium immediately below the inferior surface of the right lobe of liver. The caecum was not attached with posterior abdominal wall and was easily retractable. The appendix was paracaecal in position, it opened on the inferolateral aspect of the right wall of the caecum with its tip directed towards 7 O’clock position. The ileocaecal junction was located at the posterolateral aspect of caecum as well. The right colic flexure was deeply placed beneath the caecum (Table/Fig 1). After retraction of the caecum, the ascending colon was found to be directed backward and looped beneath the caecum in continution with the right colic flexure. There were no signs of any surgical or traumatic scarring, or pathological lesions in the anterior abdominal wall.

A small, atrophic, thick-walled gall bladder was noted, adhered to the fossa for gall bladder of liver. It was cystic on palpation, approximately 1.5 cm in length, and no bile staining was noted in and around the gall bladder. A peritoneal band extending from the fundus of gall bladder towards the right colic flexure was noted with minute, collapsed blood vessels (Table/Fig 2). The cystic duct and the common bile duct were within normal anatomical limit.

Discussion

Here, we report a case of subhepatic mobile caecum, and appendix in close proximity to inferior surface of liver, and a small atrophic gall bladder connected by peritoneal band to the right colic flexure.

Caecum and appendix, embryologically derived from midgut loop, are usually located in right iliac fossa and its lower end reaches the pelvic brim (1). The incidence of subhepatic caecum and appendix has been reported in approximately 6% of foetuses, however, cases of subhepatic appendicitis are rare and has been reported in only 0.09% cases (2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7). Acute appendicitis in subhepatic position might pose diagnostic and management challenges to the clinicians (2),(3),(5),(6),(8),(9),(10). A gall bladder is usually 7-10 cm in length, lies over fossa for gall bladder of liver (1). Agenesis or atresia of gall bladder has been rarely diagnosed and reported (11).

According to embryological explanation, the caecum develops from of the postarterial segment of the midgut loop. After physiological herniation and returning of midgut loop to the abdomen, the cecum is positioned just inferior to the liver. Failure of descent of caecum due to certain causes including incomplete rotation, malrotation and adherence to the inferior surface of liver by a fibrous band of Ladd’s, might cause its subhepatic positioning. Due to improper differentiation of walls of the caecum, the appendix could arise from lateral wall of caecum (5),(12).

In most cases, subhepatic caecum is asymptomatic and therefore, it remains undiagnosed. The previous clinical case reports of subhepatic appendicitis (3),(5),(6),(8),(9),(10) revealed that the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in an unusual position was difficult and delayed. The patients presented with right hypochondriac and epigastric pain with or without vomiting and the commonest diagnosis was acute cholecystitis. Cases were seen where the differential diagnosis included liver abscess, renal colic, peptic perforation etc, and finally the case was diagnosed by Computerised Tomography (CT) or during diagnostic laparoscopy (3),(5),(6),(8),(9),(10). As acute appendicitis is an emergency, the delayed diagnosis often led to appendicular abscess, suppuration, perforation, sepsis and required surgical procedures ranging from open appendectomy to exploratory laparotomy (3),(5),(6),(8),(9),(10).

Diffuse thickening of gall bladder wall with functional loss has been reported in inflammatory process of gall bladder which could be the possible cause of present case of atrophic gall bladder without any bile staining (11). The peritoneal band could have resulted as a response of inflammation of gall bladder followed by adhesion to nearby greater omentum or could be congenital in development. It was suggested that radiologic imaging including abdominal CT is essential in diagnosing various gall bladder pathologies (13). Any report associated with atrophic gall bladder and abnormal peritoneal band was rarely found. Such band might result in further complications including volvulus of gut loops (14). The published literature showed more frequent presence of accessory peritoneal ligaments in supra-colic compartment of the peritoneal cavity (15). In present case, the cystocolic peritoneal band was seen in the supracolic compartment only extending from gall bladder to right colic flexure. Most probably it was derived as a result of recurrent inflammation of gall bladder or was congenital in origin.

Conclusion

Presence of subhepatic, mobile caecum and appendix along with atrophic gall bladder, connected to right colic flexure by cystocolic peritoneal band is a rare occurrence. This type of subhepatic appendicitis is difficult to diagnose because of atypical presentation. It might mimic hepatobiliary pathology or might result in inflammation of the gall bladder in close vicinity resulting in adhesion with adjacent structures leading to further complications. These possibilities should be kept in mind by the physicians and surgeons dealing with patients with right upper quadrant abdominal pain. The awareness about the possibility of unusual subhepatic location of appendix, high index of suspicion, advanced radiological investigations and early exploratory laparotomy might detect these cases earlier.

References

1.
Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 42 nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 2021;1141-42.
2.
Nayak SB, George BM, Mishra S, Surrendran S, Shetty SD. Sessile ileum, subhepatic caecum and uncinate appendix that might lead to a diagnostic dilemma. Anatomy and Cell Biology. 2013;46:296-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Ball WR, Privitera A. Subhepatic appendicitis: A diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep .2013:1-2. Online. Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-009454. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Nagashree MV, Gireesh, Lakshmi Prabha S, Veena P. Sub-hepatic caecum. J Clin Diag Res. 2013;7(9):1992-93. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6061.3380. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Painuly GP, Singhal M. Difficult diagnosis of acute abdomen caused by sub hepatic caecum with acute appendicitis-A rare case report. Int J Surg Case Reports. 2020;72:608-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Alqahtani SM, Lasheen M, Paray S. Subhepatic appendicitis in an 11-year-old boy: A case report. Cureus. 2019;11(12):e6489. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.6489. [crossref]
7.
Poonia D, Goswami P, Mishra S. Sub-hepatic caecum with extra-pelvic looped sigmoid colon: An embryological and clinical perspective. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2019;6(9):I4-I6. [crossref]
8.
Zin MHBM, Kosai NR, Hayati F. Perforated subhepatic appendicitis: A case report. Gazi Medical J. 2021;32(4):575-76. Doi: 10.12996/gmj.2021.128. [crossref]
9.
Singh S, Jha AK, Sharma N, Mishra TS. A case of right upper abdominal pain misdiagnosed on computerized tomography. Malays J Med Sci. 2014:21(4):66-68.
10.
Chong HC, Chai FY, Balakrishnan D, Asilah SM, Adila IN, Syibrah KZ, et al. Malrotated subhepatic caecum with subhepatic appendicitis: Diagnosis and management. Case reports in Surgery. 2016;2016:01-03. http://dx.doi. org/10.1155/2016/6067374. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Peloponissios N, Gillet M, Cavin R, Halkic N. Agenesis of the gallbladder: A dangerously misdiagnosed malformation. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(39):6228- 31. Doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i39.6228. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. The Developing Human-Clinically Oriented Embryology. 11th South Asia ed. New Delhi: Elsevier. 2020;233.
13.
Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, Jung S. Benin gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gall bladder diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(22):2967-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Low SF, Ngiu CS, Sridharan R, Lee YL. Midgut malrotation with congenital peritoneal band: A rare cause of small bowel obstruction in adulthood. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;7. Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202690. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Deshmukh VR, Singh S, Sehgal R. Cysto-duodeno-colic ligament and its clinical relevance. Biomed J. 2016;39(6):414-16.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59360.17390

Date of Submission: Aug 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 03, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 10, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 26, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 17, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com