Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27822

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : OC16 - OC19 Full Version

Clinical Syndromes of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: An Institutional Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58198.17404
Ajit Prasad Mishra, Shubhankar Mishra, Ashok Kumar Mallick

1. Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Consultant and Faculty, Department of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of Neurology, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shubhankar Mishra,
Flat No. 403, Jain Avenue, Tulasipur, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
E-mail: dr.subham.scb@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) is a neurovascular syndrome in contrast to more common arterial disease. Despite advances in the recognition of CVST in recent years, diagnosis and management can be difficult because of the diversity of underlying risk factors and the absence of a uniform treatment approach.

Aim: To evaluate the syndromes associated with the CVST spectrum and its association with veins with detailed prognostication.

Materials and Methods: The present hospital-based, observational study was conducted in the Department of Neurology, Sri Ramachandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India. A total of 52 patients of age >14 years, who presented with radiological confirmation of venous sinus thrombosis were included in the study. All their clinical and epidemiological parameters were tabulated. They were classified into four clinical syndromes namely syndrome of raised intracranial hypertension without focal deficit, syndrome of the focal neurological deficit with or without raised intracranial hypertension, syndrome of cavernous thrombosis and syndrome of early altered consciousness with involuntary movements/diffuse encephalopathy. Clinical parameters were analysed according to syndromic presentation. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0.

Results: A total of 52 patients with radiological confirmation of CVST were evaluated over a period of two years. The mean age of presentation was 31.8±12.3 years. The mean duration of symptoms prior to hospitalisation was 13.6±11.9 days. Sensorium was normal in most of the admitted patients. In the present study, syndrome-2 (syndrome of focal neurological deficit) was the most common syndrome reported (n=32, 61.6%).

Conclusion: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis should be classified according to the syndromic association of clinical features. It will help in easy diagnosis based only on assessment of the clinical features.

Keywords

Encephalopathy, Fundus, Headache

The Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) is one of the commonest causes of hospitalisation in neurology indoors. It is a disease with potentially serious consequences and usually affects children and young people (1). Strokes in the young account for nearly 30% of all cases of stroke in India and Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT) accounts for 10-20% of these cases. One of the commonest time of presentation is the postpartum period (1),(2). There has been a drastic reduction of infection as a causative agent for CVST in recent years (1),(2),(3). CVST may occur at any time from infancy to old age and symptoms can be acute, sub-acute or chronic (4),(5),(6). A syndromic approach to CVST was described by Nagaraja D et al., and Nagaraja D and Taly AB, who had classified CVST into four distinctive clinical syndromes (7),(8):

Syndrome-1 (Syndrome of raised intracranial hypertension without focal deficit): It is found in 20% of all CVTs. It’s usually associated with isolated or predominant thrombosis of the Superior Sagittal Sinus (SSS) or lateral sinus. In this clinical syndrome, headache is bilateral, and progressive with or without vomiting. The examination may reveal papilloedema and brisk reflexes. Progression is slow and may cause visual impairment in long-standing or severe cases. Anticoagulant therapy may provide the best outcome. Some patients might need decompressive craniotomy or optic nerve fenestration.

Syndrome-2 (Syndrome of the focal neurological deficit with or without raised intracranial hypertension): It is the most common presentation of CVST after the postpartum period. Patients present with short-term headaches with abrupt generalised or focal motor seizures or hemiparesis or monoparesis or cranial neuropathy other than isolated 6th cranial nerve palsy. The SSS is commonly involved. Papilloedema is very common.

Syndrome-3 (Syndrome of cavernous thrombosis): It is seen primarily in nasal and sinus infections. There is progressive swelling and oedema of the conjunctiva. The congestion starts with one eye and later spreads to another eye. The eye protrudes with redness and congestion of the conjunctiva. Eye movements are restricted due to cranial nerve involvement.

Syndrome-4 (Syndrome of early altered consciousness with involuntary movements/Diffuse encephalopathy): Deep vein involvement is a rare presentation. It is often associated with the involvement of the superficial venous system. Consciousness is altered in the early course. Eyes are depressed and involuntary movements may be present. The prognosis is usually worse.

The primary aim of present study was to classify the CVST cohort into syndromes, which was rarely done previously in India (7),(8). The classification is much important for early diagnosis and treatment. The secondary aim of the study was to isolate the most common vein involvement in a specific syndrome with prognostication.

Material and Methods

The present hospital-based, observational study was conducted in the Department of Neurology, Sri Ramachandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India. A total of 52 patients >14 years age with radiological confirmation of CVT were evaluated and followed-up for a minimum of three years, from 2018 to 2020. Patients were included in the study after obtaining informed written consent. All study related pieces of information were anonymised, kept confidential and used only for addressing the study objectives. The eligible participants were included by consecutive enumeration.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a diagnosis of CVST, confirmed by imaging of the brain with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/ Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) scan of the brain, who gave consent to participate were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were clinically diagnosed as having CVST, but had normal imaging of the brain in MRI/MRV scans of brain, patients below 14 years of age and who were lost to follow-up were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Patients who were admitted to the In Patient Department (IPD) and were fitting to the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. All the epidemiological data, as well as clinical manifestations, were enlisted in a previously structured format. The patients were categorised as per the clinical manifestations and were grouped into four CVST syndromes for the purpose of comparison of various parameters (7). Types of syndrome are:

• Syndrome-1: Syndrome of raised intracranial pressure
• Syndrome-2: Syndrome of focal neurologic deficit with/without raised intracranial pressure
• Syndrome-3: Syndrome of cavernous sinus thrombosis
• Syndrome-4: Syndrome of unspecific diffuse encephalopathy.

Statistical Analysis

The study data was entered into Microsoft excel spreadsheet. Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages. Continuous data were expressed as numbers, mean and standard deviation depending on the distribution. Statistical significance was tested at 5% using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0. Fisher’s-exact probability test was used for assessing the association of categorical factors with the dichotomous outcome (mRS ≤2 and mRS >2). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 52 patients with radiological confirmation of CVT were evaluated. The minimum age of presentation was 15 years and maximum was 69 years. The mean age of presentation was 31.8±12.3 years. The transverse sinus was the most common sinus involved in 42 (80.7%) patients (Table/Fig 1).

The majority of patients with CVST had diverse types of symptoms and signs, found on clinical examination. The patients with these different clinical manifestations were grouped into four CVST clinical syndromes. On grouping, 17 (32.7%) patients could be classified into the syndrome of raised intracranial pressure and 32 (61.6%) patients into the syndrome of the focal neurologic deficit with/without raised ICP. Only one patient could be categorised into syndrome of cavernous sinus thrombosis and two patients into syndrome of unspecific diffuse encephalopathy. After syndromic classification from the clinical pictures, the sinus involvement was analysed.

Syndrome of raised intracranial pressure (n=17): The majority of patients (82.3%) had normal brain parenchyma. Multiple brain area involvement was absent. Most of these patients had slowly progressive or uncommonly intermittent progressive headaches associated with vomiting or diminution of vision. The majority of patients had papilloedema on examination (Table/Fig 2)a,b.

Syndrome of focal neurologic deficit with/without raised ICP (n=32): Hemiparesis with or without a seizure was the most common presentation overall, found in 37.5% of patients with this clinical syndrome. Seizure, as an isolated clinical manifestation, was a common presentation found in 28.1% of these patients. Among the patients of this syndrome, normal brain parenchyma was found in 14 patients after neuroimaging. Out of these 14 patients, four patients had 6th cranial nerve involvement and four patients had seizures as the only major manifestation. Hemiparesis was present in two patients. With 7th cranial nerve palsy (1/14), Monoparesis (1/14), Aphasia with headache (1/14), and seizure with monoparesis (1/14) as individual major manifestations were also found. Among the patients of this syndrome, brain parenchyma involvement was found in 18 patients after neuroimaging. Out of these 18 patients, hemiparesis with or without seizure was the commonest presentation found in 10 patients. Sixth nerve palsy was found in one patient and seizure as the dominant clinical presentation was seen in five out of a total of 18 patients. One patient had quadriparesis with seizure and 3rd nerve palsy. One patient presented with hemisensory loss and 7th, 9th, and 11th cranial neuropathy with cerebellar symptoms. Among the 32 patients with the syndrome of the focal neurologic deficit with/without raised ICP, major symptoms of swallowing difficulty and dysphasia were present in 4 and 5 patients, respectively (Table/Fig 3)a-c.

Syndrome of cavernous sinus thrombosis (n=1): One patient was categorised into the syndrome of cavernous sinus thrombosis. He presented to the hospital with progressive headache, swelling of the eyelid with conjunctival redness, ophthalmoplegia and blurriness of vision for a few days. Patient had thrombosis of cavernous sinus, torcula and transverse sinus but with normal brain parenchyma. He improved completely with treatment without any sequelae.

Syndrome of unspecific diffuse encephalopathy (n=2): Two patients were categorised into the syndrome of unspecific diffuse encephalopathy. One patient presented to the hospital with a history of sudden onset headache and drowsiness followed by altered sensorium with intermittent decerebrate posturing. The patient had an infarction of the brain involving the bilateral thalamus. He had thrombosis of straight sinus and deep veins. Another patient with a similar presentation had a haemorrhagic infarct of the fronto-parietal-thalamic area with oedema. He had involvement of SSS, Inferior Sagittal Sinus (ISS), sigmoid sinus, superficial cortical vein. One patient died during the treatment and one patient left the hospital and lost to follow-up.

Discussion

In the present series, 51.9% of patients were female. It has been suggested that the incidence of CVST was higher in females. Most of the earlier case series from India have reported a higher proportion of females suffering from CVST than males (8),(9),(10).

In this series, most (63.5%) patients presented subacutely. Most of the patients with chronic or subacute presentation had a slowly progressive or uncommonly intermittent headache, vomiting and blurriness of vision indicating intracranial hypertension. The acute presentation was found in 21.2% of patients and the duration of symptoms was <48 hours. Sudden onset of focal deficits simulating arterial strokes was present in 13.5% patients and six patients presented acutely with seizure. This type of presentation of CVST was also observed earlier by Bousser MG and Ross Russel RW, as per their series, the symptom onset in CVST was usually subacute (two days to one month) in 50-80% of patients and acute (two days or less) in 20-30% and many patients who presented in acute condition simulated arterial stroke (12). Chronic presentation (>2 months) was seen in 10-20% of patients predominantly presenting as isolated intracranial hypertension (13).

Most CVST patients had multiple clinical presentations, which were categorised into various clinical syndromes for comparison. On grouping, the patients into four clinical syndromes, out of 52 patients, 17 (32.7%) patients could be classified into the syndrome of raised intracranial pressure (Syndrome-1). This is the most homogeneous group among the CVST clinical syndromes in the present series, in which, the majority of patients had a progressive onset of symptoms and signs due to intracranial hypertension, presenting with headache, papilloedema with/without vomiting. This type of clinical presentation mimicked benign intracranial hypertension or pseudotumour cerebri syndromes to a great extent. As the majority of these patients (82.3%) had normal brain parenchyma on neuroimaging, it is necessary for all the neurophysicians to rule out the possibility of CVST before putting a diagnosis of benign intracranial hypertension. This type of presentation was described in various studies. In the NIVSR cohort, the benign intracranial hypertension like presentation was seen in 18.2% of patients (11).

About 61.5% of total patients were categorised into the syndrome of the focal neurologic deficit with/without raised ICP. It was the most common type of clinical syndrome in the present series, but also the clinical syndrome with the most heterogeneous presentation. About 43.7 % patients of with this syndrome had normal brain parenchyma on neuroimaging and 56.3% of patients had some parenchymal involvement. Overall, hemiparesis with or without seizure was the most common presentation, found in 37.5% of patients in this clinical syndrome. Although it is an uncommon association similar condition was described by Straub J et al., (14). Among the patients of this syndrome with brain parenchyma involvement, hemiparesis with or without seizure was the commonest presentation followed by an isolated seizure.

It represents 1.3% of all CVST syndromes. Cavernous sinus thrombosis was described in 2.4% of cases in the NIVSR cohort (11). Similar presentation was seen in the present series, but as only one patient had cavernous sinus syndrome in our series, it was difficult to assess its true frequency from this small series. About 3.8% of the total patients in the series were categorised into the syndrome of unspecific diffuse encephalopathy. One patient had an infarction involving the bilateral thalamus. He had thrombosis of straight sinus and deep veins. Patients of CVST presenting as a generalised encephalopathic illness without localising signs is not a very rare presentation, but it was described in various series in varying proportions 6-29% (7),(13).

Limitation(s)

The duration of follow-up was limited and also the sample size of the present study was small.

Conclusion

Venous thrombosis is a disease in young people, especially females. It is one of the most common neurovascular syndromes. The presentation is subacute most of the time. All the CVST clinical spectrums can be divided into four syndromes. The syndrome with raised intracranial pressure was the commonest. Syndromic classification will help to know the typical clinical presentation of the disease. Early diagnosis by MR venogram with prompt anticoagulation can limit morbidity. Several catastrophic complications can be avoided by appropriate treatment. The present study was a small study in the Southeast Asia region, and there is need of more studies in future from the present study area to delineate the exact demographic parameters along with risk factors for early diagnosis and better treatment of CVT.

References

1.
Bousser MG, Ferro JM. Cerebral venous thrombosis: An update. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:162-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Filippidis A, Kapsalaki E, Patramani G, Fountas KN. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Review of the demographics, pathophysiology, current diagnosis, and treatment. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(5):E3. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Dlamini N, Billinghurst L, Kirkham FJ. Cerebral venous sinus (sinovenous) thrombosis in children. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2010;21:511-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Bentley JN, Figueroa RE, Vender JR. From presentation to follow-up: Diagnosis and treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(5):E4. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Payne AB, Adamski A, Abe K, Reyes NL, Richardson LC, Hooper WC, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in the United States, 2018 and 2019. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2022;6(2):e12682.[crossref] [PubMed]
6.
De Bruijn SF, de Haan RJ, Stam J. Clinical features and prognostic factors of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a prospective series of 59 patients: For the cerebral venous sinus thrombosis study group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:105-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Nagaraja D, Wassy M, Christopher M, Santosh V. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis. In Chopra JS, Sawhney IMS editer. Neurology In Tropics, 2nd ed. Elsevier, 2016;669-679.
8.
Nagaraja D, Taly AB, Puerperal venous sinus thrombosis in India. In: Sinha KK ed. Progress in clinical neurosciences, Ranchi, NSI, Publications. 1989;5:165-77.
9.
Bansal BC, Gupta RR, Prakash C. Stroke during pregnancy and puerperium in young females below the age of 40 years as a result of cerebral venous/venous sinus thrombosis. Jpn Heart. 1980;21:171-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Parikh PM, Sukthankar RU, Parikh A, Pipalia DH, Sidhva SJ, Ramakanten R, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis. J Assoc Physicians India. 1987;35:349-51.
11.
Narayan D, Kaul S, Ravishankar K, Suryaprabha T, Bandaru VC, Mridula KR, et al. Risk factors, clinical profile, and long term outcome of 428 patients of cerebral sinus venous thrombosis: Insights from Nizam’s Institute Venous Stroke Registry, Hyderabad (India). Neurol India. 2012;60:154-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Bousser MG, Ross Russel RW. Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. London: WB Saunders, 1997. [crossref]
13.
Caso V, Agnelli G, Paciaroni M. Handbook on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis, In Bogousslavsky, Montreux J., Series Editor, Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, Karger. 2008;23:23-54. [crossref]
14.
Straub J, Magistris MR, Delavelle J, Landis T. Facial palsy in cerebral venous thrombosis: Transcranial stimulation and pathophysiological considerations. Stroke. 2000;31(7):1766-69.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58198.17404

Date of Submission: Jul 14, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 15, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 20, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com