Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 321002

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : OD01 - OD04 Full Version

Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia, Acute Pericarditis with Cardiac Tamponade as Presenting Manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus- A Rare Case Report


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57702.17389
Apurva Dubey, Sourya Acharya, Samarth Shukla, Sunil Kumar, Himanshu Dodeja

1. Junior Resident, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Consultant, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Neurocritical and Critical Care, Disha Multispeciality Hospital (Unit of Bhandari Hospital), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Apurva Dubey,
Junior Resident, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: apurvadubey18@gmail.com

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder that affects mostly young women in which tissue-binding autoantibodies and immune complexes cause damage to organs and tissues. SLE is characterised by aberrant immunological responses that result in the release of higher levels and immunogenic nucleic acids, proteins, and other self-antigens. Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) is a condition in which antibodies against red blood cells are present. It is classified as a warm and cold antibody AIHA. The causes of warm antibody AIHA are autoimmune illnesses, infections, or even malignancy. The presence of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies can indicate warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (warm agglutinin anaemia), which is characterised by fatigue and other constitutional symptoms. Although, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia can be a component of the SLE spectrum, warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia as the first manifestation of SLE is exceedingly rare. This case report describes a case of a 23-year-old female who presented to the hospital with complaints of breathlessness and chest pain. After evaluation she was found to have pericardial tamponade and AIHA. Pericardiocentesis was done and further investigations confirmed the diagnosis of SLE. She was treated with injectable methylprednisolone, injectable antibiotics, Tab. hydroxychloroquine, Tab. febuxostat ,Tab. colchicine, oral antidiuretic, oral levothyroxine and other supportive management. The lack of unambiguous pathognomonic characteristics or tests, coupled with the variable presentation of SLE, makes diagnosis tricky. Overall, AIHA can be an initial presentation as well as a part of other disease processes, emphasising the significance of a comprehensive work in patients with AIHA.

Keywords

Haemolysis, Pericardiocentesis, Steroids

Case Report

A 23-year-old female presented with fever (moderate grade, intermittent), swelling over face and both lower extremities for two months and breathlessness for the past two days.

On admission, she was conscious, oriented {Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 15}, breathlessness {New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade IV}. General physical examination revealed axillary temperature of 101° Fahrenheit, pulse rate was 106 per minute, Blood Pressure was 100/70 mmHg taken in right arm supine position. Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) was raised to 8.5 mm of water, pitting oedema and bluish discolouration of the nails were seen on both lower limbs. Bilateral macular oedema was revealed during a fundus examination. There was no rash observed over trunk and extremities. Auscultation revealed clear lungs and a soft, tender per abdomen examination with normal bowel sounds.

Cardiovascular system examination revealed muffled heart sound and S3 gallop.

The haematological parameters revealed pancytopenia with haemoglobin of 6.4 gm%, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC) of 3100/cubic per mm, total platelet count was 0.53 lakh/cubic mm. Direct and indirect Coombs test was done by gel card method and Direct Coombs Test (DCT) was positive (Table/Fig 1). The Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) test revealed to be 2.8 (0.9 negative, >1.1 raised) with a homogeneous nuclear pattern (typically associated with SLE). Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen, and hepatitis C antibodies were non reactive. The peripheral blood smear revealed normocytic normochromic Red blood cells with anisopoikilocytosis in the form of schistocytes, spherocytes and both respectively, suggestive of haemolytic anaemia (Table/Fig 2)a-c.

Blood group A+ with positive Coombs with warm antibodies, as well as several additional antibodies, was detected throughout the type, screen, and cross match process. The patient was hospitalised to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), where her haemodynamics and transfusion reactivity were constantly scrutinised. Haematological and rheumatology work-ups were continued while ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis was suggestive of bilateral perirenal fluid collection associated with bilateral polycystic ovarian disease. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was suggestive of suggestive of low QRS voltages in limb leads and precordial leads with electrical alternans (Table/Fig 3).

Interstitial oedema, moderate cardiomegaly, enlarged cardiac silhouette or “water bottle sign” suggestive of pericardial effusion were noted on a chest X-ray (Table/Fig 4).

2D Echocardiogram (ECHO) was done which was suggestive of massive pericardial effusion with tamponade (Table/Fig 5). [Video-1] shows Right ventricle (RV) free wall is collapsing in RV cavity. Diastolic collapse of RV, sign of cardiac tamponade (Table/Fig 6). In view of polyserositis, pericarditis complicated in cardiac tamponade Urgent pericardiocentesis was done (Table/Fig 7).

In view of Polyserositis, Pericarditis complicated in cardiac tamponade urgent pericardiocentesis was done (Table/Fig 7).

Review 2D ECHO was done after pericardiocentesis suggestive of minimal anterior collection of pericardial effusion, posterior pericardial effusion 0.8 mm (Table/Fig 8).

Patient was advised kidney biopsy in view of evidence of severe nephritis but she denied. She was treated with injectable methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day for seven days followed by 1 mg/kg/day injectable prednisolone for next seven days), Injectable antibiotics, tab. hydroxychloroquine, tab. febuxostat, tab. colchicine (in view of initial episode of acute pericarditis) 0.5 mg once daily, oral antidiuretic, oral levothyroxine and other supportive management. She was discharged after 15 days and was advised to continue oral corticosteroid like prednisolone 30 mg once a day till next follow-up, tab. hydroxychloroquine, tab. febuxostat, oral antidiuretic, oral levothyroxine on lower dose of 12.5 mcg once a day. On her first follow-up after 15 days her breathlessness significantly improved and there was no evidence of pericarditis, pancytopenia.

Discussion

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory condition that impacts several organs and has an unexplained cause. Serosal involvement is prevalent in SLE (1), and it has been included in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) lupus diagnostic criteria since1982, and later in the Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 classification criteria (2).

SLE is more common in women of childbearing age, such as in the present case report. Pericarditis is the most prevalent lupus cardiac symptom, affecting 9-54% of lupus patients. Cardiac tamponade is substantially less common, with an incidence of about 2.5% (3). Predictive variables and the prevalence of tamponade in lupus patients were only briefly discussed in a few publications. Eric Dein et al., reported pericarditis is a manifestation of SLE serositis recognised in the ACR, SLICC classification criteria of SLE (4).

Chadia Chourabi et al., reported a case of 22-year-old female known case of SLE that manifested initially as cardiac tamponade, based on haemolytic anaemia, serositis, arthralgia, positive anti-nuclear, and low complement they diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus, pericardiocentesis, intravenous methylprednisolone followed by daily oral prednisone with hydroxychloroquine administered to the patient (5). SLE causes haematological symptoms in all three cell lines, resulting in anaemia, thrombocytopaenia, and leuckopenia, with anaemia being the most prevalent (6).

Anaemia can be caused by a variety of factors, including anaemia of chronic diseases, immunological hemolysis, nephropathy, or treatment-induced anaemia. Autoimmune hemolysis affects less than 10% of SLE patients (7). Haemolytic anaemia can develop years before or after a diagnosis of SLE, and it is rarely the first manifestation of SLE (7). Haemolytic anaemia is one of the diagnostic criteria for SLE in both the 2019 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria (8).

Hair P et al., concluded the persistence of circulating anti-erythrocyte antibodies in 90% of subjects with SLE and a history of AIHA (9). The resulting erythrocyte complement opsonization and anaphylatoxin production raise the possibility that these complement effectors are involved in chronic morbidity and the risk of AIHA relapse (9). Kanderi T et al., describes a rare case of a 32-year-old woman who had a muddled clinical picture and later diagnosed with warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Additional immunological and inflammatory testing done both during and after the patient’s hospitalisation resulted in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (10).

Warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is more prevalent than cold agglutinin type autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Haemolytic anaemia has no specific diagnostic criteria; however, it is diagnosed if there is no other cause of anaemia and signs of RBC destruction (like elevated LDH, unconjugated bilirubin, low haptoglobin), markers of expedited RBC production (like increased reticulocyte count), positive DAT test, and schistocytes or spherocytes on a peripheral smear. Warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is caused by IgG antibodies that cause hemolysis in the spleen by Fc-mediated extravascular phagocytosis of IgG-coated red blood cells, ultimately in spherocytes due to RBC membrane loss (11).

The application of ACR criteria in the present case is shown below (a score of at least 10 indicates SLE) (2). Enrollment criteria Antinuclear antibody (ANA) with a titer greater than or equal to 1: 80 is required. In the present case report, the patient met the diagnosing criteria with a total score of 25.

With the following positive findings in the present case met the 2012 SLICC criteria (8) for SLE-

1. Lupus nephritis: ANA;
2. Clinical criteria: Serositis, renal and haemolytic anemia;
3. Immunological criteria: ANA, Anti-dsDNA, antiphospholipid antibody, low complement, positive direct Coombs test.

After ruling out other possibilities like infection, cancer, or heart failure, lupus-related serositis was confirmed. The diagnosis of pericarditis made with clinical features, clinical examination, 2D- echocardiogram, electrocardiography. Clinically typical precordial sharp pain; pericardial rub on auscultation; characteristic ECG changes (electrical alternans); also associated with features developed on echocardiography were suggestive of pericardial tamponade in this case report.

Mathian A et al., describes circulating regulatory T cells are rapidly, dramatically, and briefly increased by intravenous high dose methylprednisolone. This growth might contribute to methylprednisolone’s ability to prevent future SLE flare-ups (12). Cheng W et al., suggested early pericardiocentesis can save lives, hence it is important that cardiac tamponade be identified as soon as possible with comprehensive physical examination and the necessary investigations (13). Immunosuppression, preferably with intravenous methylprednisolone and adjuvant pericardiocentesis, appears to be necessary and efficacious in lupus-related tamponade.

References

1.
Goswami R, Sircar G, Ghosh A, Ghosh P. Cardiac tamponade in systemic lupus erythematosus. QJM-Int J Med. 2017;111(2):83-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcx195. PMID: 29048543. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, et al. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2677-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Rosenbaum E, Krebs E, Cohen M, Tiliakos A, Derk CT. The spectrum of clinical manifestations, outcome and treatment of pericardial tamponade in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective study and literature review. Lupus. 2009;18:608-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203308100659. PMID: 19433460. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Dein E, Douglas H, Petri M, Law G, Timlin H. Pericarditis in lupus. Cureus. 2019;11(3):e4166. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.4166. PMID: 31086751; PMCID: PMC6497510. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Chourabi C, Mahfoudhi H, Sayhi S, Dhahri R, Taamallah K, Chenik S, et al. Cardiac tamponade: An uncommon presenting feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (a case-based review). Pan Afr Med J. 2020;36:368. Doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.368.25044. PMID: 33235645; PMCID: PMC7666689. [crossref][crossref]
6.
Velo-García A, Castro SG, Isenberg DA. The diagnosis and management of the haematologic manifestations of lupus. J Autoimmun. 2016;74:139-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2016.07.001. PMID: 27461045. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Kokori SI, Ioannidis JP, Voulgarelis M. Autoimmune hemolyticanemia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med. 2000;108(3):198-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00413-1. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Mohanty B, Ansari MZ, Kumari P, Sunder A. Cold agglutinin-induced hemo-lytic anemia as the primary presentation in SLE- A case report. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(5):1807-08. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_298_19. PMID: 31198766.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Hair P, Goldman DW, Li J, Petri M, Krishna N, Cunnion K. Classical complement activation on human erythrocytes in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Lupus. 2020;29(10):1179- 88. Doi: 10.1177/0961203320936347. Epub 2020 Jul 12. PMID: 32659155; PMCID: PMC8260106. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Kanderi T, Kim J, Chan Gomez J, Joseph M, Bhandari B. Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia as the initial presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A case report. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22:e932965. Doi: 10.12659/AJCR.932965. PMID: 34897265; PMCID: PMC8672920. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Gerber B, Schanz U, Stüssi G. Autoimmune hemolyticanemia. Ther Umsch. 2010;67(5):229-36. [in German]. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Mathian A, Jouenne R, Chader D, Cohen-Aubart F, Haroche J, Fadlallah J, et al. Regulatory t cell responses to high-dose methylprednisolone in active systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143689. Doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0143689. PMID: 26629828; PMCID: PMC4667921. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Cheng W, Balachandar R, Mistry P. Cardiac tamponade: An initial presentation of SLE. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2013200011. Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013- 200011. PMID: 23868025; PMCID: PMC3736635.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57702.17389

Date of Submission: May 12, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 05, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 01, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 17, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 26, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jul 28, 2022 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com