Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 7485

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : PR01 - PR03 Full Version

Appendicular Gastralgia Revisited: A Case Series of this Rare Presentations


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69485.19773
Shreyasi Jha, Ameet Kumar

1. Resident, Department of General Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ameet Kumar,
Professor, Department of Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune-411040, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: docam@rediffmail.com

Abstract

In the myriad of clinical presentations of acute appendicitis, appendicular gastralgia remains a poorly researched entity. In this article, authors present a series of three cases of acute appendicitis that initially presented as appendicular gastralgia. A 35-year-old gentleman initially presented with complaints of epigastric pain of six hours’ duration with an Alvarado score of 3/10 and was managed medically. Re-examination after six hours of unresolved pain revealed Right Iliac Fossa (RIF) tenderness. Similarly, a 13-year-old boy presented with epigastric pain of 12 hours’ duration with a normal clinical examination and an Alvarado score of 5/10. The pain radiated to RIF after 12 hours with RIF tenderness. A 58-year-old lady presented with pain in the epigastrium of six hours’ duration and had a normal clinical examination, haematological and radiological parameters. She was initially managed medically. However, due to the non resolution of symptoms despite treatment, she underwent Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) Abdomen, which revealed a localised appendicular perforation with appendicoliths. All three patients underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy and had an uneventful postoperative recovery with no recurrence of epigastric pain. Low Alvarado scores, non specific clinical findings and equivocal imaging delay diagnosis in these cases. Through this article, attempt was made to enhance awareness of this entity amongst clinicians.

Keywords

Appendicitis, Dyspepsia, Epigastric pain, Gastritis, Preileal appendix

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency encountered and has a varied spectrum of initial presentation and clinical features. Appendicular gastralgia is one of its rare presentations. Dyspepsia itself is a widespread entity amongst the gamut of clinical presentations and is also found to be associated with acute appendicitis (1). Appendicular gastralgia was first described by Herbert Paterson in 1910 (1). However, it has not been widely researched or described thereafter. In this article, authors present a series of three cases with epigastric discomfort and dyspepsia as presenting features, which were then diagnosed as acute appendicitis. The cases highlight the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for acute appendicitis in cases of epigastric pain.

Case Report

Case 1

A 35-year-old gentleman, a known case of hyper-reactive malarial splenomegaly, initially presented with pain in the epigastrium. The pain was acute on onset, intermittent, severe in intensity, non radiating, and migrated to the RIF after six hours. There was no history of vomiting or anorexia, fever, constipation, obstipation, jaundice, or Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). His initial vitals and abdominal examination were normal. The umbilicus was central, inverted, and circular. No scars, sinuses, or dilated veins were noted. All quadrants moved equally with respiration. The abdomen was soft with no tenderness, guarding, rigidity, McBurney tenderness, palpable lump, or evidence of free fluid. Tympanic note was present on percussion, and bowel sounds were present. The Alvarado score of this patient was 3/10 (2). With a presumptive diagnosis of acute gastritis, the patient was prescribed proton pump inhibitors. He returned to the emergency department after six hours with pain in the RIF. On re-examination, he had McBurney tenderness with no rebound tenderness, palpable lump, guarding, or rigidity. Investigations showed leukocytosis with neutrophilia. All other biochemical parameters were normal. An ultrasound of the abdomen revealed a 7 mm blind-ending non compressible aperistaltic tubular structure in the RIF with minimal periappendiceal fluid. The patient underwent an emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. Intraoperatively, an inflamed preileal appendix was found. The postoperative period remained uneventful with complete resolution of epigastric discomfort. The patient was discharged on postoperative day five and followed-up for the next three months. There was no recurrence of epigastric pain (Table/Fig 1) (2),(3).

Case 2

A 13-year-old boy with no known co-morbidities initially presented with pain in the epigastrium of 12 hours’ duration. The pain was acute in onset, intermittent, of moderate intensity, non radiating, non migratory, and associated with two episodes of non bilious vomiting and anorexia. There was no history of fever, constipation, obstipation, jaundice, or LUTS. Examination of the abdomen displayed epigastric tenderness but no McBurney tenderness or rebound tenderness. There was no guarding or rigidity noted. Investigations showed leukocytosis with neutrophilia and a normal abdominal ultrasound. Biochemical parameters, including serum amylase and lipase, were normal. The Alvarado score was 5 out of 10. Therefore, the patient was managed medically with proton pump inhibitors and antiemetics. He returned after 12 hours with severe pain in the epigastrium radiating RIF. On examination, McBurney tenderness was present, but there was no rebound tenderness or palpable lump. There was no guarding or rigidity observed. He underwent emergency diagnostic laparoscopy, during which an inflamed preileal appendix was noted, and an appendectomy was performed (Table/Fig 2).

The postoperative recovery remained uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day five. There was no recurrence of epigastric pain on follow-up.

Case 3

A 58-year-old lady with a known history of hypertension presented with epigastric pain of six-hour duration. The pain had an acute onset, was intermittent, of moderate intensity, and non radiating. There was no history of vomiting, anorexia, fever, constipation, obstipation, jaundice, chest pain, palpitations, or cough. The patient had normal findings on clinical examination, haematological and biochemical parameters, as well as on abdominal ultrasound. Serum amylase and lipase levels were within normal limits. The patient was initially managed as a case of acute gastritis. However, after 12 hours, the pain migrated to RIF. On repeat abdominal examination, McBurney tenderness was present. There was no rebound tenderness, palpable lump, guarding, or rigidity. A CECT scan of the abdomen revealed a localised appendicular perforation with appendicoliths. Subsequently, the patient underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. Intraoperatively, a 10 mm preileal appendix with a perforated tip and 50 mL of pus collection were noted (Table/Fig 3). The postoperative period remained uneventful with no recurrence of epigastric pain.

Discussion

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency and has a varied spectrum of presentation, the most common being periumbilical pain migrating to the RIF. It may also be associated with nausea, vomiting, fever, anorexia, tenderness, or rebound tenderness in the RIF. Appendicular gastralgia is described as pain in the epigastrium due to appendicular pathology with no evidence of duodenal ulcer or any stomach pathology. This was first observed by Paterson while visiting the Mayo Clinic in 1907, when he observed Dr. Mayo operating on two patients with suspected duodenal conditions. During laparotomy, appendicular pathology was evident instead of gastric or duodenal causes. Dr. Mayo performed appendectomy on these patients with no recurrence of epigastric pain. Paterson extrapolated this observation to a series of 24 patients with appendicular gastralgia (1).

The pathophysiology behind epigastric pain in acute appendicitis is hypothesised to be intestinal stasis due to an inflamed appendix, based on the duodenal dilatation seen frequently in the cases operated by Paterson (1). Alternate mechanisms conjectured are pain due to protective pyloric spasm, which is secondary to intestinal stasis and hyperchlorhydria. The latter hypothesis was concurred with by Moynihan in his article published in 1910 (4). Both Paterson and Moynihan found haematemesis and melaena associated with appendicular gastralgia (1),(4). Hyperchlorhydria is hypothesised to be the cause of mucosal irritation leading to melena or haematemesis. Alternate explanations are sepsis, omental vessel thrombosis, and toxic influences (5). These mechanisms mimic those of stress ulcers, and hence the symptom spectrum of both stress ulcers and appendicular gastralgia remains similar. It is important to note that the epigastric pain consequent to appendicular pathologies is resolved postsurgery.

Despite advances in imaging modalities, clinical assessment of acute appendicitis remains the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical scoring systems used are Alvarado and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA), which provide standard results with a sensitivity of Alvarado and RIPASA scores of 96.2% and 58.9%, respectively, with a specificity of 90.5% and 85.7% (6). In patients with acute epigastric pain, acute pancreatitis, and acute cholecystitis should also be differentiated from gastralgia due to the overlapping spectrum of symptoms. Patients with acute pancreatitis will exhibit pain radiating to the back and relief on bending forwards and will exhibit raised serum amylase and lipase values. Clinical examination frequently displays fever, tachycardia, epigastric tenderness with localised guarding, and hypoactive bowel sounds secondary to ileus (7),(8).

In experience with these cases, it was observed that patients with acute appendicitis with an initial presentation as appendicular gastralgia tend to have a low Alvarado score at presentation, display migration of pain to RIF within 24 hours, and have a preileal position of the appendix peroperatively. However, whether these findings are causal or casual would be apparent in a larger series. Frequently, due to non specific clinical findings, equivocal imaging findings, and low Alvarado /RIPASA score, patients miss early diagnosis and risk failure of diagnosis. Untreated appendicitis poses the risk of a myriad of complications, and early diagnosis is both desired and necessary. The clues to an atypical presentation of appendicular pathology in patients with epigastric pain may be provided by pain remaining unresolved by antacids and subsequent radiation of pain to the right lower abdomen. The history and repeated physical examination are important modalities in diagnosing or excluding appendicitis (9). Ultimately, a high index of suspicion, close observation, and re-examination at frequent intervals, and the utilisation of point-of-care ultrasound and CT scans in cases of diagnostic dilemmas would clinch the diagnosis as the disease process evolves (9),(10),(11).

Conclusion

Appendicular gastralgia remains a poorly studied entity in the spectrum of presentations of appendicular inflammation and requires a high index of suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment. Present article will raise awareness of this condition amongst clinicians.

References

1.
Paterson HJ. Appendicular gastralgia, or the appendix as a cause of gastric symptoms. Proc R Soc Med. 1910;3(Surg Sect):187-208. [crossref]
2.
Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: A systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:139. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-139. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mumtaz H, Sree GS, Vakkalagadda NP, Anne KK, Jabeen S, Mehmood Q, et al. The RIPASA scoring system: A new Era in appendicitis diagnosis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;80:104174. Doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104174. PMID: 36045852; PMCID: PMC9422193. [crossref]
4.
Moynihan BG. Remarks on appendix dyspepsia. Br Med J. 1910;1(2561):241-44. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Pisarra VH. Recognizing the various presentations of appendicitis. Nurse Pract. 1999;24(8):42, 44, 49, 52-53. [crossref]
6.
Nanjundaiah N, Mohammed A, Shanbhag V, Ashfaque K, Priya SA. A comparative study of RIPASA score and ALVARADO score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(11):NC03-NC05.
7.
Grigorian A, Lin MYC, de Virgilio C. Severe epigastric pain with nausea and vomiting. Surgery. 2019:227-37. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05387-1_20. PMCID: PMC7123429. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Yasin AL, Sh’aban AHM, Yousaf A, Toffaha A, Jaleel ZT. Acute appendicitis presenting as epigastric pain due to incomplete intestinal malrotation. Cureus. 2021;13(5):e15088. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.15088. PMID: 34159002; PMCID: PMC8212854. [crossref]
9.
Yew KS, George MK, Allred HB. Acute abdominal pain in adults: Evaluation and diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2023;107(6):585-96. PMID: 37327158.
10.
Odabasi M, Arslan C, Abuoglu H, Gunay E, Yildiz MK, Eris C, et al. An unusual presentation of perforated appendicitis in epigastric region. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(2):76-78. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 12. PMID: 24441442; PMCID: PMC3921649. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL. Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA. 1996;276(19):1589-94. PMID: 8918857. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69485.19773

Date of Submission: Feb 13, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Mar 20, 2024
Date of Acceptance: May 22, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 13, 2024
• Manual Googling: Mar 14, 2024
• iThenticate Software: May 21, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com