Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23769

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : ER01 - ER05 Full Version

Sclerosing Angiomatoid Nodular Transformation: A Series of Four Cases


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73377.20333
PP Mansoor, Linoka Asheto Achumi, Aditi Bhattacharyya, Biswanath Paul

1. Third Year Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pathology, I.P.G.M.E&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. First Year Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pathology, I.P.G.M.E&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, I.P.G.M.E&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Biswanath Paul,
22/2, Umesh Mukherjee Road, P.O.- Belgharia, Kolkata-700056, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: paul.biswanath1@gmail.com

Abstract

Among the primary non haematopoietic neoplasms of the spleen, vascular neoplasms are the most common. These vascular neoplasms consist of haemangiomas, littoral cell angiomas, lymphangiomas, Splenic Hamartomas (SHs), haemangioendotheliomas, angiosarcomas and Sclerosing Angiomatoid Nodular Transformation (SANT). SANT is a recently described, rare non neoplastic vascular entity of the spleen. The majority of patients are asymptomatic and are incidentally picked up on Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), but the diagnosis can mimic malignant lesions of the spleen on imaging studies. SANT is considered a female-predominant disease with a wide age distribution. Majority of cases have been reported in the adult age group, in paediatric age it is very rare. Hereby, the authors present a case series of four patients diagnosed with SANT in tertiary care hospital. Two of them were in the paediatric age group (four-year-old boy and 14-year-old girl), while the other two were middle-aged adults (46-year-old female and 41-year-old male). Both paediatric patients presented with symptoms of abdominal pain and discomfort and underwent an Ultrasonographic (USG) examination, which showed a well-circumscribed hypoechoic mass. Laboratory findings showed increased Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and anaemia. Based on the clinical and radiological findings, diagnosis of splenic hamartoma and inflammatory pseudotumour were made in these cases. Unlike the paediatric patients, both adult patients were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during routine radiological examinations. The USG examination showed a well-circumscribed hypoechoic mass, with a difference in the size of the lesions. Light microscopic examination and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the diagnosis of SANT in all cases. The patients were followed for six months, during which no recurrences occurred. Although SANT is a benign tumour, it can sometimes be misdiagnosed by radiological studies, so surgical removal followed by histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations is required for an accurate diagnosis.

Keywords

Histopathology, Immunohistochemistry, Non haematopoietic, Splenic proliferation

The Sclerosing Angiomatoid Nodular Transformation (SANT) is a rare non haematopoietic primary splenic proliferation that is often missed or misdiagnosed in routine histopathological practice. Martel M et al., first described SANT as a distinct diagnostic entity in 2004, based on a series of 25 cases (1). In a recent systematic review of the literature by Aziret M et al., 230 cases of SANT were found to be published from 2004 to 2020 (2); but only a few cases have been found in children (3). The majority of these cases were reported outside of India. Indian data on SANT in the adult age group is very limited and in paediatric age group only three cases have been reported from the western part of the country by Kale KA et al., Vyas M et al., and Agrawal M et al., (4),(5),(6). Differentiating SANT from other benign primary tumours and tumour-like lesions of the spleen can only be achieved by a thorough histopathological examination with the use of immunomarkers. We conducted a retrospective study from January 2012 to December 2023 in the Pathology Department of present tertiary care hospital in eastern India. In present series, authors discussed four cases of SANT diagnosed and treated during this period, among them two were paediatric age and two were adult cases.

Case Report

Case 1

A four-year-old male child presented to the Paediatric Department with intermittent dull pain in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen, without other symptoms. Haematological parameters, along with liver and kidney function tests, were unremarkable, except for an increased level of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). An abdominal ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic mass lesion in the spleen and a probable diagnosis of a benign vascular lesion was given. Which on CECT scan showed a comparatively hypovascular center with an enhancing rim and radiating vascularised tissue penetrating from the periphery toward the center of the lesion. “Spoke Wheel” pattern on delayed imaging is thought to a result from contrast penetrating the centre of the lesion from the peripheral vascular rim (Table/Fig 1)a,b. The patient was then referred to the Paediatric Surgery Department, where a laparoscopic splenectomy was done for further evaluation and the specimen was sent to present department.

On gross examination, the splenectomy specimen measured 11×6×4 cm, with the cut section showing a well-circumscribed, non encapsulated bosselated mass measuring 3×2.5×2 cm. which on cut section showed firm, tan-white nodules separated by satellite fibrous areas and foci of haemorrhage (Table/Fig 2)a,b.

Microscopic examination showed splenic parenchyma was replaced by multiple well-circumscribed nodules of varying sizes, surrounded by a variable fibrosclerotic stroma. The nodules were composed of vascular spaces of different calibers, ranging from capillaries to sinusoid-like spaces lined by bland to plump endothelial cells without any atypia, necrosis, or mitotic figures. The intersecting fibrous septa showed bands of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts with abundant chronic inflammatory cells, like lymphocytes, plasma cells and haemoseridin-laden macrophages (Table/Fig 3)a-c.

To confirm the diagnosis, Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed, which showed CD31 positivity in all capillaries and small veins, whereas CD34 staining highlighted only the capillaries. CD8 immunostaining showed positivity only in occasional sinusoid-like spaces but not in capillaries and small veins. Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) staining highlighted the myofibroblastic stroma. Also, CD68 highlighted the spindle cell component and histiocytes (Table/Fig 4)a-e.

On the basis of clinical presentation, radiological findings, histopathological results and immunohistochemical findings, a diagnosis of SANT was made. The patient was followed up for one year after the surgery, with no recurrence reported.

Case 2

A 14-year-old female presented with left upper abdominal pain for six months and anaemia. Ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic lesion in the spleen. A clinical diagnosis of inflammatory pseudotumour was given. CT scan or MRI was not performed. Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed and the tissue was sent for histopathological examination. The spleen was measuring 10×8 centimeters and had a circumscribed multinodular mass measuring 5×3 cm. The cut section appeared congested, with whitish fibrous strands in the parenchyma forming nodules.

Histopathological examination showed multiple nodules composed of vascular spaces, capillaries and sinusoid-like vessels of varying sizes within dense fibrotic stroma. The fibrous tissue was infiltrated by inflammatory cells, mainly lymphocytes and plasma cells (Table/Fig 5)a-c.

Immunohistochemistry was performed and revealed positivity for CD34, CD31 and CD8. CD34 positivity was observed in capillaries, CD8 positivity in sinusoids and CD31 positivity in all capillaries and small veins. CD68 highlighted the histiocytes and SMA was present in the myofibroblastic stroma. On the basis of histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, a diagnosis of SANT was offered. The follow-up period was uneventful.

Case 3

A 46-year-old female came to Surgery Department for further investigations of a solid tumour of the spleen. The mass was diagnosed by a routine ultrasonography performed by a private practitioner. The patient’s medical and family history was unremarkable. On physical examination, she was in good general condition without anorexia, fever, night sweats, or hepatomegaly. A provisional clinicoradiological diagnosis of splenic haematoma was made. Laparoscopic resection was performed and the specimen was sent to present Department.

On gross examination, a splenic mass measuring 6x5 cm with a haemorrhagic cut surface separated by fibrous tissue was seen. Histological examination showed a well-demarcated multinodular lesion surrounded by a reactive fibrous tissue, primarily composed of vascular spaces of different sizes. (Table/Fig 6)a-c.

Immunohistochemical staining showed that capillaries expressed CD31 and CD34, while small vessels and sinusoids expressed CD31 and CD8, respectively. These findings were similar to those of a SANT. The patient’s follow-up course was uneventful.

Case 4

A 41-year-old diabetic male patient came to the Surgery Outpatient Department with a splenic mass, which was diagnosed as a splenic hamartoma by a Radiologist. After the resection of the mass, it was sent to present Department. On gross examination, it was a well-circumscribed lesion measuring 8×5×4 cm, with nodules surrounded by collagen fibers. Microscopically, multiple nodular vascular lesions presented in a fibrocollagenous connective tissue background. The lesion is composed of three types of blood vessels and capillaries (Table/Fig 7)a,b: CD31+/CD34+/CD8-; sinusoids, that are CD31-/CD34-/CD8+; and small veins, which are CD31+/CD34-/CD8-. All cases have been summarised in (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

In literature, initially, these lesions were considered a special type of splenic hamartoma (7),(8). It was Martel M et al., concluded, in their case series of 25 patients, concluded SANT is a separate neoplasm of the spleen (1). They described SANT as a well-circumscribed, nodular solitary lesion of the spleen with a characteristic immunostaining profile. The nodules in SANT develop from the splenic red pulp due to extensive stromal proliferation, causing small vascular disruptions and proximal vascular tract hyperplasia. It is a form of splenic hamartoma as it is made up of red pulp tissue (1).

The SANT is a relatively uncommon splenic lesion coming under non haematopoietic vascular tumours of the spleen, along with other entities like, splenic hamartoma, haemangioma, haemangioendotheliomas and littorel cell angiomas. It is more prevalent in adults but can be occur in the paediatric age group. After an extensive search of the literature, we found only 15 cases of SANT in the paediatric age group worldwide (3). Demographic and clinical data of all previously reported paediatric cases are summarised in (Table/Fig 9). Only three cases were reported in India: one by Kale KA et al., presented in a 13-year-old female; second by Vyas M et al., in an 11-year-old boy; and a third case by Agrawal M et al., in a 12-year-old girl [4-6]. The majority of these cases were from outside of India (Table/Fig 9) (3),(4),(5),(6),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18).

No literature was found regarding paediatric involvement of SANT in present region. SANT were reported majority in girls than boys. In present cases, one was a girl and the other was a boy. In the paediatric age group, all most all patients presented with abdominal pain or discomfort. In present cases Clinical presentation was similar. In adults, SANT is considered a female-predominant lesion occurring in their fourth to seventh decades of life (19). Most adult patients are asymptomatic, with the condition often detected incidentally detected on imaging studies. A very less proportion of patients present with vague symptoms of abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, flank pain and abdominal distension. In diameter study, the adult patients were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during routine radiological examinations.

The exact aetiology of SANT is not yet well understood, but it has been reported that SANT can be associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related sclerosing disease (20). Later publications ruled out these hypotheses and concluded that SANT is a polyclonal reactive lesion (21). Martel M et al., hypothesised that SANT shares similar features with inflammatory pseudotumours (1). Authors took a thorough clinical and treatment history of present four cases but could not find out any IgG4-related disease or any history of past or present EBV infection.

Histopathological examination with radiological correlation is necessary for a definitive diagnosis of SANT. A CT scan typically shows a solitary, well-circumscribed, multilobulated mass with a hypo-vascular center and an enhancing rim in the post contrast phases. A “spoke wheel” pattern of progressive central enhancement can also be appreciated. In contrast to most of its differential diagnosis, a low signal intensity lesion can be appreciated of T2-weighted MRI (22). T1-weighted images mostly show low to intermediate signal intensity, which, on adding contrast (gadolinium), reveals a spoke wheel pattern with a central stellate scar. There is very few published data on the role of Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) in diagnosing SANT (23). On Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)-CT, lack of 99mTc-sulfur colloid is due to the absence of reticuloendothelial cells within the SANT (22).

Gross examination after splenectomy shows a well-circumscribed, non encapsulated mass with multiple confluent nodules interspersed with fibrotic stroma (24). On microscopic examination, the stable low-power magnification appearance of SANT reveals multiple angiomatous nodules within a fibro-sclerotic stroma. The nodules are of variable size, generally round and widely separated by a sclerotic stroma, though occasional coalescence may occur (1). Vascular spaces of three different calibres, lined by plump endothelial cells, can be appreciated within the nodules (1). On immunohistochemistry, these nodules demonstrate heterogeneous mixture of immunomarkers. The inter-nodular stroma is usually fibro-sclerotic and contains chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, along with myofibroblasts. Literature told that the spindle-shaped cells found inside and around the angiomatoid nodules are myofibroblasts, which express SMA (25).

Immunohistochemistry demonstrates (CD31+/CD34-/CD8+) splenic sinusoids, (CD31-/CD34+/CD8-) capillaries and (CD31+/CD34-/CD8-) small veins (1). CD68+ dendritic phagocytic cells can also be demonstrated focally (26). The main differential diagnosis of SANT includes other common benign vascular lesions and rare nodular transformations of splenic red pulp in response to metastatic carcinoma. Littoral cell angioma, a distinctive vascular neoplasm of the spleen, also shows multiple red pulp nodules composed of variably sized vascular channels. However, distinct nuclear features (vesicular nuclei, open chromatin and small nucleoli), the presence of haemophagocytosis and aggregates of eosinophilic globules, along with a specific immunophenotype (CD31, CD68, CD21 positivity), make it distinctly different from SANT. SH is also characterised by slit-like vascular channels resembling sinusoids but lacks the vascular spaces of capillaries and small veins seen in SANT. Other differential diagnosis include benign vascular lesions (haemangioendothelioma, haemangioma) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours of the spleen. Only one case of SANT has been reported in an accessory spleen (27).

Splenectomy (either open or minimally invasive) is the curative treatment for SANT (28). Although most patients are asymptomatic and without any risk of malignant transformation, surgery is better indicated as some lesions that resemble SANT may be malignant in nature. Core biopsy can be done to distinguish SANT from other benign lesions, but there is a risk of profuse bleeding and the chance of intra-peritoneal seeding in cases of some conditions, such as angiosarcoma (29). No evidence of recurrence has been reported during the follow-up period after splenectomy.

Conclusion

The SANT of the spleen is a benign vascular lesion of the spleen with a wide range of age distribution, but it occurs more commonly in adults than in the paediatric age group. SANT should be included in the differential diagnosis of any patient presenting with an angiomatoid or inflammatory splenic lesion. It exhibits characteristic morphological and immunophenotypic findings, followed by an incidentally on imaging studies. Surgical histopathology is indicated, as the differential diagnosis for SANT includes some malignant conditions.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge to the Department of Paediatric Surgery, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital; Department of Surgery, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital; Department of Pathology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital for their support.

References

1.
Martel M, Cheuk W, Lombardi L, Lifschitz-Mercer B, Chan JK, Rosai J. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT): report of 25 cases of a distinctive benign splenic lesion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(10):1268-79. Doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000138004.54274.d3. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Aziret M, Yilmaz F, Kalpakçi Y, Subas¸i Ö, S¸ entürk A, Karaman K, et al. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation presenting with thrombocytopenia after laparoscopic splenectomy - Case report and systematic review of 230 patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;60:201-210. Doi: 10.1016/j. amsu.2020.10.048. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Soleimani N, Geramizadeh B, Anbardar MH, Bahador A, Safavi D, Mohammadzadeh S, et al. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen in a child with anemia: A case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):404. Doi: 10.1186/s13256-023-04144-0. PMID: 37735700; PMCID: PMC10514923. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Kale KA, Dhote T, Mohammad K, Anitha P. A rare case of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen in a 13-year old girl. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2022;9(1):88-90. Doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.103. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Vyas M, Deshmukh M, Shet T, Jambhekar N. Splenic angiomatoid nodular transformation in child with inflammatory pseudo tumor-like areas. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54:829-31. Doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.91543. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Agrawal M, Uppin SG, Bh S, Suppin M, Challa S. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen: a new entity or a new name? Turk Pantology Derg. 2016;32:205-10. Doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2013.01219. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Önder S, Kosemehmetoglu K, Himmetoglu Ç, Firat P, Uner A. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of spleen: A case report describing cytology, histology, immunoprofile and differential diagnosis. Cytopathology. 2012;23(2):129-32. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00901.x. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Krishnan J, Frizzera G. Two splenic lesions in need of clarification: hamartoma and inflammatory pseudotumor. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2003;20(2):94-104. Doi: 10.1016/s0740-2570(03)00014-5. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Sanmoto Y, Ishimaru T, Hayashi K, Tomita O, Oshima K, Nakazawa A, et al. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation in a child. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2021;68:101836. [crossref]
10.
Jamal A, Siddique U, Inam Ur Rehman SIU, Arain M, Hamid A. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of spleen in a 8-year old girl. J Pakistan Med Assoc. 2020;70:1448-50. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Idrissa S, Rabattu P-Y, Sole Cruz E, Robert Y, Piolat C. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen in children: a two-case report of laparoscopic total or partial splenectomy and a literature review. World J Ped Surgery. 2020;3(4):e000153. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Zhang S, Yang W, Hongyan XU, Zhuqiang WU. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of spleen in a 3-year-old child. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:1081-83. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Bamboat ZM, Masiakos PT. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen in an adolescent with chronic abdominal pain. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:E13-E16. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kuybulu A, Sipahi T, Topal I, Uner A. Splenic angiomatoid nodular transformation in a child with increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009;26:533-37. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Pelizzo G, Villanacci V, Lorenzi L, Doria O, Caruso AM, Girgenti V, et al. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation presenting with abdominal hemorrhage: First report in infancy. Pediatr Rep. 2019;11(2):7848. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Delgado MA, Fleming A, El-Gohary Y, Abdelhafeez A, Santiago T, McCarville ME, et al. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen in a four- year-old with anemia. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2018;38:53-56. [crossref]
17.
Cao P, Wang K, Wang C, Wang H. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation in the spleen: A case series study and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(17):e15154. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Abboud B, Honein K, Abboud C, Aidibi A, Yared F, Ghorra C. Unusual case of Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of spleen in an adolescent patient: case report and literature review. Ann Surg Perioper Care. 2021;6(1):1046.
19.
Awamleh AA, Perez-Ordoñez B. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(6):974-78. Doi: 10.5858/2007- 131-974-SANTOT. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kashiwagi S, Kumasaka T, Bunsei N, Fukumura Y, Yamasaki S, Abe K, et al. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA-expressed myofibroblasts and IgG4-producing plasma cells in sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen. Virchows Arch. 2008;453(3):275-82. Doi: 10.1007/s00428-008- 0648-z. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Chang KC, Lee JC, Wang YC, Hung LY, Huang Y, Huang WT, et al. Polyclonality in SclerosingAngiomatoid Nodular Transformation of the Spleen. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(10):1343-51. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.02.015. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Thacker C, Korn R, Millstine J, Harvin H, Van Lier Ribbink JA, Gotway MB. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen: CT, MR, PET, and 99(m)Tc-sulfur colloid SPECT CT findings with gross and histopathological correlation. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35(6):683-89. Doi: 10.1007/s00261-009- 9584-x. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Lee D, Wood B, Formby M, Cho T. F-18 FDG-avid sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen: Case study and literature review. Pathology. 2007;39:181-83. Doi: 10.1080/00313020601123904. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Metin MR, Evrimler S, Çay N, Çetin H. An unusual case of sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation: Radiological and histopathological analyses. Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(3):530-33. Doi: 10.3906/sag-1304-141. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Sekaran A et al. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of spleen: An uncommon benign lesion of spleen. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2021;9(5):1489-93. [crossref]
26.
Li L, Fisher DA, Stanek AE. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen: Addition of a case with focal CD68 staining and distinctive CT features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(6):839-41. Doi: 10.1097/01. pas.0000160441.23523.d1. [crossref]
27.
Niu M, Liu A, Wu J, Zhang Q, Liu J. Sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation of the accessory spleen: A case report and review of literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(26):e11099. Doi: 10.1097/ MD.0000000000011099. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Chen YC, Huang JW, Su WL, Chang WT, Kuo KK. Laparoscopic approach is the treatment of choice for sclerosingangiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015;31(9):496-97. Doi: 10.1016/j. kjms.2015.05.002. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
López JI, Del Cura JL, De Larrinoa AF, Gorriño O, Zabala R, Bilbao FJ. Role of ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the evaluation of spleen pathology. APMIS. 2006;114(7-8):492-99. Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_378.x. PMID: 16907854.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73377.20333

Date of Submission: Jun 08, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 25, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 04, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 10, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 27, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 07, 2024 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com