Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 17304

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : OC05 - OC10 Full Version

Incidence and Outcome of Spontaneous Alveolar Air Leak Events in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69709.20267
Samruddhi Dhanaji Chougale, Anita Tulshiramji Anokar, Amarnath P Prasad, Uma A Deshpande, Sashi Bhushan, Ashish A Dhotre, Kiran Vadapalli

1. DM Fellow Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. DM Fellow, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Consultant, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ravi Hospital, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. 6. Consultant, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nobel Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 7. DM Fellow, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Assistant Professor Medicine, Rangraya.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anita Tulshiramji Anokar,
B14, Shivtej Society, Tejasnagar, Kothrud, Pune-411038, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: anuanu14@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has increased the burden of hospitalised pneumonia cases and related complications. Spontaneous Pneumothorax (PT) and Pneumomediastinum (PM) have been reported in both spontaneously breathing and ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Aim: To determine the incidence and outcomes of spontaneous alveolar air leak events in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was carried out from June 2020 to June 2021 at a tertiary care centre in Western India. All incident cases of alveolar air leaks in COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Clinical and demographic data were collected, and statistical analysis was performed. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to assess the differences in subgroup proportions.

Results: A total of 79 patients (63 males and 16 females) experienced spontaneous alveolar air leaks in the form of PT, PM (mediastinal emphysema), or Subcutaneous Emphysema (SE), either isolated or in combination. A total of 58 patients (73.41%) had PT, while 8 patients (10.12%) had isolated PM and 2 patients (2.53%) had isolated SE. Of the total events, 35 (44.30%) occurred in spontaneously breathing patients, among them vigorous coughing was an important precipitating factor. At the time of the incident, 1.27%, 21.52%, and 77.21% of the affected cases belonged to mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 categories, respectively. Male patients (n-63, 79.74%) in the age group of 30-60 years were predominantly affected. A total of 38 events (48.10%) occurred within two weeks (early) of symptom onset. The PaO2:FiO2 ratio at the time of the alveolar leak showed a significant association with the outcome. Patients with PT had a poorer outcome compared to those with other types of alveolar leaks (p-value<0.005). Major bleeding occurred in 2 (3.33%) of the total 60 Intercostal Drainage (ICD) procedures. Prolonged alveolo-pleural fistula healed spontaneously in four out of five cases. The cumulative incidence for air leak events was 1.55%, and for barotrauma, it was 6.47%. The overall mortality in this cohort was 74.68% (n=59), while it was 29.41% (5 out of 17) in the moderate severity group. Patients with late-onset events had a better outcome (p-value<0.005).

Conclusion: In this cohort of COVID-19 pneumonia from Western India, the cumulative incidence of spontaneous alveolar air leaks was 1.55%, predominantly affecting males. The early occurrence of PT in severely hypoxic patients on mechanical ventilator was associated with higher mortality.

Keywords

Barotrauma, Mediastinal emphysema, Pneumothorax, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), posed multiple challenges to the healthcare system. Severe cases of COVID-19 were complicated by Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Multiorgan Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS), pulmonary embolism, myocarditis, secondary bacterial or fungal infections, and post-COVID-19 lung sequelae. Complications related to spontaneous alveolar air leaks, in the form of PT and PM, were also reported in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (1),(2),(3). The term spontaneous PT refers to the presence of air in the pleural space that is not caused by trauma or another obvious precipitating factor (4). While primary spontaneous PT occurs without a clinically apparent lung condition, secondary spontaneous PT is a complication of pre-existing lung diseases, such as bronchial asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), cystic lung diseases, and some lung infections like tuberculosis or Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (4). PM and SE refer to the presence of air in the mediastinum and subcutaneous tissue, respectively (5).

In COVID-19 patients, spontaneous air leak events have been reported with or without Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) (1),(2),(3). There is limited Indian data on the incidence of spontaneous alveolar air leak events in COVID-19 pneumonia and the factors affecting their outcomes [6-8]. Thus, this study was conducted to estimate the incidence of PT, PM, and SE in COVID-19 pneumonia and their outcomes in a tertiary care centre in western India, which was highly affected during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra, India, from June 2020 to June 2021, covering two major COVID-19 waves in western India. Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval was obtained (IEC number-BVDUMC/IEC/23).
Inclusion criteria: All consecutive COVID-19 positive cases (as confirmed by Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) or Rapid Antigen Testing (RAT)) with a clinical and/or radiological diagnosis of spontaneous PT, PM, or SE, either isolated or in combination, were included. These cases were grouped together as spontaneous alveolar air leak events in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Exclusion criteria: PT secondary to iatrogenic injuries or trauma was excluded from the study.

Sample size: This was an exploratory study on COVID-19, and all incident cases over the study period were included. Informed consent was obtained from the patient or their immediate relative.

Demographic data, including age, gender, co-morbidities, and clinicoradiological characteristics, were documented. The time of occurrence of the alveolar air leak event, clinical symptoms, ventilator parameters, requirement for Intercostal Drain (ICD), and associated complications were recorded.

Case definitions: COVID-19 positive: A nasopharyngeal swab for RT-PCR was used to establish the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Severity grading of COVID-19 disease (9):

- Asymptomatic/Presymptomatic infection: Individuals who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 but show no symptoms consistent with COVID-19.
- Mild illness: Individuals who exhibit any signs and symptoms of COVID-19 but do not have shortness of breath or have abnormal chest imaging.
- Moderate illness: Individuals who show evidence of lower respiratory disease during clinical assessment or imaging and have an oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥94% on room air.
- Severe illness: Individuals with SpO2 <94% on room air, a ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) <300 mm Hg, a respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, or lung infiltrates >50%.
- Critical illness: Individuals who have respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction.

Cytokine storm: The working diagnosis of cytokine storm in COVID-19 was based on supporting laboratory parameters, including C-Reactive Protein (CRP) >50 mg/L, Ferritin >700 μg/L, D-Dimer >0.5 mg/L, and Interleukin-6 >7 pg/mL (10).

Place of event: Pneumonia cases requiring less than 15 litres of oxygen on non rebreather masks with stable haemodynamics were managed in COVID wards, while critical cases were treated in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was coded and entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 software. The results were presented in tabular and graphical formats. For qualitative data, various rates, ratios, and percentages (%) were calculated. For quantitative data, the mean was calculated. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the differences in subgroup proportions. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Total 5,101 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were admitted during the study period. The study protocol for case inclusion is shown in (Table/Fig 1). A total of 79 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 58 (73.42%) patients suffered from spontaneous PT, with 39 (49.37%) had isolated PT, while others presented with either PM or SE.

Incidence of Alveolar Air Leak: In this study, the cumulative incidence of alveolar air leaks in COVID-19 positive cases was 1.55% (79 out of a total of 5,101). Barotrauma occurred in 6.47% (44 out of 680 patients on invasive ventilation). The incidence of PT was 1.14% (58 out of 5,101) among all hospitalised cases of COVID-19 pneumonia.

A total of 63 (79.75%) male and 16 (20.25%) female COVID-19 positive cases with alveolar air leaks were included in this cohort. Age groups from 41 to 60 years were more affected. Diabetes and hypertension were common co-morbidities in the study population. A total of 61 (77.21%) cases had severe COVID-19 pneumonia at the time of the alveolar leak (Table/Fig 2). Total 34 (58.62%) cases had right-sided PT, while 8 (13.79%) had bilateral PT (Table/Fig 3). Retrosternal chest pain was a predominant symptom in 14 (46.67%) of the total 30 patients with PM (mediastinal emphysema). Clinical examination revealed SE in the form of palpable crepitus and swelling of the neck and chest wall.

(Table/Fig 4) gives distribution of cases according to the place of event and the pattern of alveolar leaks. Five patients had PT or PM at the time of hospitalisation. The other cases are divided (inpatient ward/ICU) as per COVID-19 severity. Out of a total of 79 patients, 35 (44.30%) were spontaneously breathing at the time of the air leak event, while 44 (55.70%) had barotrauma. All patients with severe pneumonia who were on a mechanical ventilator (IPPV) died, with the exception of two -one with PM and the other with PM+SE.

Early versus late events: In 38 (48.10%) cases, alveolar air leaks occurred within two weeks of symptom onset. Radiologically, these patients had severe disease with bilateral patchy Ground-Glass Opacities (GGO) and extensive consolidation. Interstitial emphysema was noted on HRCT in 2 (2.53%) cases (Table/Fig 5)a. Patients with late-onset alveolar air leak events had subpleural blebs, parenchymal cysts, or cavitations contributing to the risk of alveolar rupture (Table/Fig 5)b-d.

Radiological findings: All patients had features of COVID-19 pneumonia with varying degrees of bilateral GGO and consolidation, as shown in (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6). Chest X-rays (CXR) showed lung cysts in 4 cases (5.06%) (Table/Fig 6)a and cavities in 2 cases (2.53%). Thirty-eight patients (48.10%) who experienced air leak events underwent High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scans during hospitalisation. On HRCT, 19 cases (24.09%) presented with discrete lung cysts (Table/Fig 5)b, and subpleural multiple bullae were observed in two cases (2.53%) (Table/Fig 5)c. Additionally, one case (1.26%) demonstrated a cavity with hydro-pneumothorax (Table/Fig 5)d. No cysts were detected in the other cases.

Outcome: (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8) summarises the outcomes in this cohort of COVID-19 pneumonia patients. A total of 20 patients (25.32%) survived, 18 of them had late-onset alveolar air leak events. Overall mortality in this group was 74.68% (n=59). Mortality among females was 81.3%, while it was 73% among males. The gender difference in mortality was not statistically significant (p-value=0.749). In this study, mortality in patients with moderate COVID-19 was 29.41%, primarily due to progressive worsening of hypoxia or sepsis, whereas it was 88.52% in ICU patients with severe COVID-19. In subgroup analysis, invasively ventilated patients with early occurrences of air leak, a PaO2:FiO2 ratio of less than 100 at the time of air leak, and acidosis on arterial blood gas analysis had higher mortality (p-value <0.001). Patients with pneumothorax had poorer outcomes compared to those with isolated subcutaneous emphysema or pneumomediastinum (Table/Fig 7). In the subgroup analysis, PaO2:FiO2 ratio of less than 100 at the time of air leak had higher mortality. The median age of those who died was higher than that of those who survived, as illustrated in the boxplot (Table/Fig 8).

Eight patients (28.57%) out of a total of 28 with severe SE required decompressing incisions. There were 60 Intercostal Drainage (ICD) procedures performed on 52 patients, 8 (15.38%) of whom had bilateral pneumothorax. Non trocar ICD tubes, ranging in size from 20 to 24, were used in the majority of cases, while a pigtail catheter was inserted in two cases. There was a persistent air leak due to Bronchopleural Fistula (BPF) beyond 4-6 weeks in 5 (9.61%) patients. One case with pyopneumothorax and BPF required lobectomy, while the others were managed conservatively. Histopathological examination of the resected lung segments showed micro-abscesses with vasculitis.

Complications related to ICD (Table/Fig 3):

Bleeding: Out of the 60 ICD procedures, self-limiting bleeding occurred after emergency ICD in 6 (10%) cases of tension PT. These patients had severe COVID-19 pneumonia and were on therapeutic anticoagulation. Major bleeding complicated two cases (3.33%), around 400 mL-600 mL lost within 4-6 hours post-ICD insertion. One patient on Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) survived with spontaneous cessation of bleeding but later developed segmental pulmonary artery embolism. The other case, complicated by sepsis and coagulopathy, died due to simultaneous multisite bleeding, shock, and severe hypoxia.

Empyema: Post-ICD empyema secondary to nosocomial pathogens developed after the second week of ICD in 6 (10%) cases. All recovered with antibiotics and ICD drainage.

Discussion

Alveolar air leak events PT, PM in COVID-19 pneumonia have been reported in both spontaneously breathing and ventilated patients. Secondary spontaneous PT has also been reported in cases of H1N1, SARS, and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) viral pneumonia-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) (11),(12),(13).

The present study provides a large single-institution data from western India on spontaneous alveolar air leak events in COVID-19 pneumonia. The proportion of alveolar air leaks occurring in spontaneously breathing patients was higher (44.30%) in this study group compared to other studies (20-33%) (6),(14). The male population was affected more than the female population (4:1), which was consistent with other studies (1),(14). In a study by Martinelli AW et al., 90% of the patients were aged between 30 and 70 years, similar to present study cohort (1). Co-morbid conditions such as diabetes and hypertension were associated with increased severity of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (15). Asthma and COPD are known risk factors for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (4). However, this study cohort had a very low prevalence of underlying respiratory conditions that predispose individuals to spontaneous PT. Right-sided PT was more common than left-sided (58.62% vs. 27.59%). In a study by Geraci TC et al., 50% of cases had right-sided PT (14). The average median age of those who died was 57 years. In a multicentric study from Mumbai, the mean population age was 60 years, with a mortality rate of 74% (6). The severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous air leak events (p-value<0.001), which may be related to severity of alveolar damage. Cases of pneumothorax related to SARS were also associated with severe diffuse alveolar damage (16).

This study highlights the outcomes of cases in relation to the timing of the occurrence of alveolar air leaks. Early occurrence of air leaks within two weeks of symptom onset was associated with poor outcomes (p-value<0.001). Multiple mechanisms play a role in spontaneous alveolar air leaks in COVID-19 pneumonia. One such mechanism is extensive alveolar injury caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, leading to alveolar rupture secondary to damage of type-1 and type-2 alveolar epithelial cells (17). This can explain the early events occurring during the acute phase within two weeks of illness. Another mechanism could involve the formation of cystic spaces in the lungs, which are prone to rupture (18),(19). The cause may be ischaemic injury leading to decreased lung compliance and cyst formation or could be secondary to resolving consolidation (20). This mechanism will be responsible for late events that occur after two weeks of illness.

In the present study, 51.90% of air leaks occurred after two weeks (late events) of symptom onset. In a large multicentric case series, pneumothorax events were reported after a median of 14 days of hospitalisation (11). The present study can relate these early and late radiological findings, ranging from bilateral subpleural patchy GGO with extensive consolidation and interstitial emphysema in early cases to cyst or bullae formation with interstitial thickening in late events. Another added risk factor was cavitating pneumonia and Pyo-pneumothorax secondary to Klebsiella pneumoniae. There is a higher risk of these infections in critically ill COVID-19 patients (21). Secondary bacterial infections were lower in those who survived, but the difference was not statistically significant.

In the present study, two patients had interstitial emphysema and PM (Table/Fig 5)a without PT on HRCT. Most of the awake patients had severe bouts of dry cough as a predominant symptom. This leads to an increase in alveolar pressure and contributes to alveolar rupture in already damaged parenchyma (22),(23). Sudden alveolar rupture resulting in interstitial emphysema and PM can be explained by the Macklin effect (23).

Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) may also contribute to barotrauma in addition to the mechanisms mentioned above. According to an update by Diaz R and Heller D every mechanically ventilated patient is at risk for barotrauma (24). This risk significantly increases with ventilator settings such as large tidal volumes or high Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), which manifest as high plateau pressures (25). The COVID-ARDS ventilation in the study population was in accordance to the ARDSnet protocol of low tidal volume, i.e., 4-6 ml/kg of ideal body weight, along with prone positioning (25). Four patients had plateau pressures between 30 and 40 cm H2O just before the event. Plateau pressures more than 35 cm H2O are associated with an increased risk of barotrauma (26).

In the present study, the incidence of PT was 1.14% among hospitalised cases of COVID-19 pneumonia, which was in accordance with recent studies (1),(6). Retrospective studies have shown that PT in COVID-19 might occur in 1% of the total hospitalised patients and in 2% of ICU admissions, contributing to 1% of deaths from COVID-19 infection (27),(28),(29).

In a similar study by Tetaj N et al., the incidence of barotrauma was 5.8% in COVID-19 patients on invasive ventilation, compared to 6.47% in this cohort (30). This incidence of barotrauma in COVID-19 was quite low compared to MERS-CoV infected patients (30%) and SARS infected patients (12-34%) (11),(12),(31).

In the present study, patients with a late occurrence of alveolar air leak had better survival outcomes, even though prolonged ICD was required in few of them. This point towards the primary disease processes, such as ARDS or the cytokine storm, may contribute to increased mortality in the early phase. Other studies in COVID-19 support these findings (15),(29).

In severe COVID-19 cases requiring mechanical ventilation, reported mortality rates range from 57% to 94% (6),(15),(32),(33). In the present study, among a cohort of COVID-19 patients with air leak events, the mortality rate in those with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia (admitted to the ward) was 29.41% (5/17). The overall mortality rate in moderate to severe COVID-19 cases with alveolar air leaks was 74.68%, which was similar to the findings of a multicentric study from western India, where the mortality rate was 74% (6). In a study by Geraci TC et al., the in-hospital mortality rate was 58% for COVID-19 patients who developed PT, with most events occurred beyond the second week of hospitalisation (14). This aligns with the findings of the present study, where the mortality rate for late-onset air leak events was 56%. Mortality among the female subgroup was slightly higher than that of males, as most of the cases belonged to age group of 61-70 year age group. Patients with acidosis (pH < 7.35) had significantly increased mortality. Similar findings were noted by Martinelli AW et al., (1).

In the study by Martinelli AW et al., the 28-day mortality rate did not significantly differ between those who developed PT and those with isolated PM (1). In the present study, there was a statistically significant difference in mortality between the PT group and other cases of alveolar air leaks without PT. These findings correlate with the systematic review by Zhong Z et al., (34).

In the present study, the incidence of major bleeding complications from the insertion of an ICD was very low at 3.33%, similar to the study by Geraci TC et al., (14). Bleeding complications are known to occur in pleural procedures (4). Severe cases of COVID-19 pneumonia were on therapeutic anticoagulation, and spontaneous cessation of bleeding occurred after anticoagulation was withheld (8). In non life-threatening situations, adherence to the protocol for periprocedural management of anticoagulation is necessary. Surgical intervention was required in only one case of persistent Bronchopleural Fistula (BPF). In the study by Geraci TC et al., 5% of cases underwent surgical intervention (14). (Table/Fig 9) highlights the salient review of relevant studies on COVID-19-related PT/barotrauma (1),(6),(14),(30).

Limitation(s)

As this was a single-centre study, the results cannot be generalised. Many asymptomatic patients with subtle PT, PM, and SE may have been missed, as serial HRCT scans were not performed in all hospitalised patients. This study does not comment on the incidence of PT in the male and female populations separately, the incidence in COVID-19 patients on non invasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or the comparative outcomes of patients without air leak events.

Conclusion

In this cohort of COVID-19 cases from western India, the cumulative incidence of spontaneous alveolar air leak was 1.55%. The occurrence of PT within the first two weeks of illness in a severely hypoxemic patients on invasive mechanical ventilator carries poor prognosis. There is a need for multicentric prospective case-control studies to determine the incidence of spontaneous secondary PT and the factors affecting its outcome.

References

1.
Martinelli AW, Ingle T, Newman J, Nadeem I, Jackson K, Lane ND, et al. COVID-19 and pneumothorax: A multicentre retrospective case series. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(5):2002697. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02697-2020. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Zhou C, Gao C, Xie Y, Xu M. COVID-19 with spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):510. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Wali A, Rizzo V, Bille A, Routledge T, Chambers A. Pneumomediastinum following intubation in COVID-19 patients: A case series. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(8):1076-81. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Noppen M. Spontaneous pneumothorax: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and cause. Eur Respir Rev. 2010;19:217-19.[crossref][PubMed]
5.
Maunder RJ, Pierson DJ, Hudson LD. Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1447-53. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Udwadia ZF, Toraskar KK, Pinto L, Mullerpatan J, Wagh HD, Mascarenhas JM, et al. Increased frequency of pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 patients admitted in the ICU: A multicentre study from Mumbai, India. Clin Med (Lond). 2021;21(6):e615-e619. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Paul SS, Mohan Lal B, Ray A, Meena VP, Garg RK, Tiwari P, et al. Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study from tertiary care institute in India. Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(6):310-16. Doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01105. PMID: 35034924. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Kedia Y, Awad NT, Nair J, Patil D, Amin P, Vijayan S, et al. Spontaneous pneumothorax in patients of COVID-19 pneumonia. J Assoc Physicians India. 2022;70(2):11-12. PMID: 35436820.
9.
COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 10]. Available at https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/.
10.
Jialal I, Devaraj S. Defining the cytokine storm syndrome of COVID-19: Role of the clinical laboratory. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2020;50(5):703-05.
11.
Shim SS, Kim Y, Ryu YJ. Novel influenza A (H1N1) infection: Chest CT findings from 21 cases in Seoul, Korea. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(2):118-24. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Das KM, Lee EY, Al Jawder SE, Enani MA, Singh R, Skakni L, et al. Acute middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus: Temporal lung changes observed on the chest radiographs of 55 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(3):W267-74. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14445. Epub 2015 Jun 23. PMID: 26102309. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Peiris JS, Chu CM, Cheng VC, Chan KS, Hung IF, Poon LL, et al. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: A prospective study. Lancet. 2003;361(9371):1767-72. Doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13412-5. PMID: 12781535; PMCID: PMC7112410. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Geraci TC, Williams D, Chen S, Grossi E, Chang S, Cerfolio RJ, et al. Incidence, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(2):401-07. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):475- 81. Doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Hosseiny M, Kooraki S, Gholamrezanezhad A, Reddy S, Myers L. Radiology perspective of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome. Am J Roentgenology. 2020;214(5):1078-82. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Gralinski LE, Baric RS. Molecular pathology of emerging coronavirus infections. J Pathol. 2015;235:185-95. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Rodrigues RS, Barreto MM, Werberich GM, Marchiori E. Cystic airspaces associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. Lung India. 2020;37:551-53. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sun R, Liu H, Wang X. Mediastinal emphysema, giant bulla, and pneumothorax developed during the course of COVID-19 pneumonia. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(5):541. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Aguilar PM, De Lucas EZ, Walther RÃ. Lung cysts in a patient with SARS-CoV-2. Medicina Clinica (English Ed.). 2020;155(7):325. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Anokar A, Jedge P, Shah J, Chougale S. The utility of a modified technique for lower respiratory tract sampling in COVID-19 ICU and review of diagnostic approaches in suspected ventilator associated pneumonia. Critical Care Innovations. 2021;4(3):01-14.
22.
Park SJ, Park JY, Jung J, Park SY. Clinical manifestations of spontaneous pneumomediastinum. The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;49(4):287. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Macklin MT, Macklin CC. Malignant interstitial emphysema of the lungs and mediastinum as an important occult complication in many respiratory diseases and other conditions: An interpretation of the clinical literature in the light of laboratory experiment. Medicine. 1944;23:281-358. [crossref]
24.
Diaz R, Heller D. Barotrauma and Mechanical Ventilation. [Updated 2023 Jul 31]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 09]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK545226/.
25.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med. 2000;342(18):1301-08. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alía I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, et al. Mechanical Ventilation International Study Group. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A 28-day international study. JAMA. 2002;287(3):345-55. Doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.345. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Attaway AH, Scheraga RG, Bhimraj A, Biehl M, Hatipog? lu U. Severe COVID-19 pneumonia: Pathogenesis and clinical management. BMJ. 2021;372:n436. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. Doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Yang F, Shi S, Zhu J, Shi J, Dai K, Chen X. Analysis of 92 deceased patients with COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020;92(11):2511-15. Doi: 10.1002/jmv.25891. Epub 2020 Aug 21. PMID: 32293741; PMCID: PMC7262332. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Tetaj N, Garotto G, Albarello F, Mastrobattista A, Maritti M, Stazi GV, et al. Incidence of pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in 497 COVID-19 patients with moderate-severe ARDS over a year of the pandemic: An observational study in an Italian third level COVID-19 hospital. J Clin Med. 2021;10(23):5608. Doi: 10.3390/jcm10235608. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Fowler RA, Lapinsky SE, Hallett D, Detsky AS, Sibbald WJ, Slutsky AS, et al. Critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA. 2003;290(3):367-73. Doi: 10.1001/jama.290.3.367. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-62. Doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Umeh C, Tuscher L, Ranchithan S, Watanabe K, Gupta R. Predictors of COVID- 19 mortality in critically ill ICU patients: A multicenter retrospective observational study. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e20952. [crossref]
34.
Zhong Z, Guo J, Li X, Han Y. Effects of pulmonary air leak on patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23(1):398. Doi: 10 .1186/s12890-023-02710-2. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69709.20267

Date of Submission: Feb 01, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Mar 08, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Oct 10, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 02, 2024
• Manual Googling: Mar 13, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Oct 09, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com