Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 222996

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : EC23 - EC28 Full Version

Evaluation of Thyroid Lesions by Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/61390.19784
Siddaganga Santosh Mangshetty, Rajashree Jagadish Ingin, Sudharani Sudheer

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Khaja Banda Nawaz Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sudharani Sudheer,
Christa-Nilaya, H. No. 22-21, Gulistan-E-Shahi, Behind Stadium, Kalaburagi-585102, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drsudharanis@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Thyroid diseases are the most common endocrine disorders treated by physicians in their routine practice. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) plays a dominant role in managing thyroid lesions.

Aim: To determine the utility of FNAC in diagnosing various thyroid lesions and to categorise them according to the Bethesda system of reporting.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the pathology department of a tertiary care hospital from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021. FNA specimens obtained from 540 patients presenting with thyroid swelling were analysed, classified using the Bethesda system, and the distribution of cases in each category was studied.

Results: The age of the patients ranged from 8 years to 74 years, with a mean age of 41 years. The majority of patients were in their third and fourth decades. There was a female preponderance, with a female-to-male ratio of 11:1. Out of 540 cases, 476 (88.15%) were benign lesions, six (1.11%) were Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (FLUS), 22 (4.07%) were Follicular Neoplasm (FN)/Suspicious for FN, three (0.56%) were suspicious of malignancy, 14 (2.59%) were malignant, and 19 (3.52%) were non-diagnostic/unsatisfactory. Cytohistopathological correlation was performed in 52 benign and nine malignant lesions in this study. The sensitivity of FNAC was 94.7%, specificity was 97.6%, and diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%.

Conclusion: FNAC is a rapid and minimally invasive procedure used in preoperative screening to distinguish between benign and malignant thyroid lesions. It has high sensitivity and specificity. The Bethesda system allows for precise cytological diagnosis, standardisation in reporting, improved clinical significance, and leads to the best management approaches.

Keywords

Bethesda system, Colloid goiter, Papillary carcinoma thyroid

Thyroid diseases are the most common endocrine disorders treated by physicians in their routine practice. Thyroid lesions are easy to diagnose, as even a small swelling of the thyroid is easily visible and can be treated by the physician. It is necessary to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions because malignancy requires immediate surgery (1).

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an effective tool in evaluating diffuse thyroid lesions, although there are various tests to assess thyroid gland function (2). It is a simple, rapid, cost-effective, and minimally invasive procedure used in preoperative screening to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. The use of FNAC has significantly reduced the number of surgeries performed for thyroid lesions (3). However, it has a few drawbacks, such as incomplete aspiration, a risk of false positives and false negatives, and the inability to distinguish between follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma (4). The success of FNA depends on the experience of the aspirator, skillful cytological interpretation, along with relevant clinical and radiological details (5).

However, due to a lack of standardised terminology for the cytologic diagnosis of the thyroid, FNA diagnoses, and diagnostic categories are defined differently among institutions. The Bethesda System was introduced in 2007 to standardise the reporting system for thyroid FNA specimens and was revised in the year 2017 (6),(7). The new recommendations included six diagnostic categories: i) non-diagnostic or unsatisfactory (ND/UNS); ii) benign; iii) Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS) or FLUS; iv) FN or SFN; v) Suspicious for Malignancy (SM); and vi) malignant (6),(7).

The study is undertaken to evaluate the advantage of FNAC as an initial investigative procedure for the diagnosis of thyroid lesions and to categorise them according to the Bethesda System, which has improved clinical significance and high predictive value. It helps differentiate benign from malignant lesions and triage patients who need surgery. Hence, appropriate therapy necessary for the patient can be planned by the clinicians.

Material and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, thyroid FNAC slides reported in Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India, were collected retrospectively from July 2016 to June 2021 and reviewed as per the current recommended Bethesda nomenclature (7), with approval from the ethical committee of our institute (IEC No- 95/2021-22). All patients presenting with diffuse or nodular thyroid enlargement, who were subjected to FNAC (either direct or ultrasound-guided), were included in the study, while patients with neck swellings unrelated to the thyroid were excluded.

Procedure

FNAC was performed on five hundred and forty patients using a sterile 24-gauge disposable needle under all aseptic precautions. Patient details such as age, sex, and investigations like thyroid profile and Ultrasonography (USG) were noted. Dry smears were prepared and stained with Giemsa stain, while wet smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain. Cytodiagnosis was provided after the smears were examined by two experienced cytologists. The inter-observer variability of the Kappa statistic value was 0.92, indicating perfect agreement between the two cytologists. The results were classified as per the current recommended Bethesda nomenclature into six groups (6). The results were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

In this study, a total of 540 cases of thyroid swelling were included, with 497 females and 43 males. The female-to-male ratio is 11:1, indicating a female preponderance. The age of presentation ranged from 8 years to 74 years, with a mean age of 41 years. The most common age group affected was 21-30 years, with 193 cases (35.74%), followed by the 31-40 years age group with 159 cases (29.44%), and the 41-50 years age group with 80 cases (14.82%). The least affected age groups were below 10 years, with five cases (0.92%), and above 70 years, with two cases (0.37%), as shown in (Table/Fig 1).

The majority of patients, 440 (81.48%), presented with painless, slow-growing thyroid swelling. A few patients, 49 (9.07%), complained of pain and discomfort, 22 patients (4.08%) presented with difficulty in swallowing, 17 (3.15%) with hoarseness of voice, 10 (1.85%) with rapid growth, and two (0.37%) presented with thyromegaly and cervical lymphadenopathy. The thyroid swelling was diffuse in 63% of cases and nodular in 37% of cases. The swelling was mobile and soft in most cases (42.59%) and firm in 39.63% of cases.

Thyroid profile status was available for 280 patients, among whom most (38%) were euthyroid (n=210), and 11.86% were hypothyroid (n=64). The majority of thyroid aspirates were haemorrhagic (62%), followed by colloid-like aspirate (35%), and cystic fluid (3%).

On cytology, out of 540 cases, 476 (88.15%) were benign lesions, six (1.11%) were reported as FLUS, 22 (4.07%) were FN/SFN, three (0.56%) were suspicious of malignancy, 14 (2.59%) were malignant, and 19 (3.52%) were non-diagnostic/unsatisfactory, as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

The cytological spectrum of 476 benign lesions revealed 216 (45.38%) cases of colloid goitre, 134 (28.15%) cases of nodular goitre, three (0.63%) cases of thyroglossal cyst, two (0.42%) cases of toxic goitre, six (1.26%) cases of a cystic nodule, and 115 (24.16%) cases of thyroiditis (69 Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 43 lymphocytic thyroiditis, and three granulomatous thyroiditis). Out of 14 malignant cases, 12 (85.71%) were reported as papillary carcinoma, one (7.14%) was poorly differentiated carcinoma, and one (7.14%) was anaplastic carcinoma (Table/Fig 2).

In the benign category (category II), the most common lesion diagnosed was colloid goitre (Table/Fig 3). The cytological features seen were follicular epithelial cells arranged in monolayered sheets or in clusters, cyst macrophages, and lymphocytic infiltrate in a few cases. Cellularity was low to moderate in a blood-mixed colloid background.

A diagnosis of thyroiditis was made in 115 patients. A total of 12.78% of cases were of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and showed lymphocytic infiltrate destroying follicular epithelial cells with Hurthle cell change (Table/Fig 4). Clusters of epithelioid histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells were seen in granulomatous thyroiditis.

There were three (0.63%) cases of thyroglossal cysts. Aspirated fluid showed scant cellularity. Squamous cells and macrophages were seen in the smear.

In this study, AUS/FLUS (category III) constituted 1.11% of cases. Few aspirates which had some features of atypia but could not be categorised definitely into either of the benign, SFN, SM, or malignancy categories were grouped under this category. Smears showed cytological features of high cellularity, follicular cells with cytological and architectural atypia at places with an occasional occurrence of Hurthle cells.

Around 4.07% of cases were of FN or SFN (Category IV). Aspirates showing moderate to high cellularity, predominantly microfollicular pattern of follicular cells in a repetitive pattern, with scant colloid, were grouped under this category.

Three (0.56%) cases were of SM (Category V). All three cases were reported as suspicious for papillary carcinoma. Smears were highly cellular with follicular cells showing a papillary pattern of arrangement. The nuclei were enlarged with an irregular nuclear membrane. Nuclear grooving and intranuclear inclusions were absent.

Papillary carcinoma is the most common malignant lesion in the present study. The aspirated smears showed the cells with round to oval pale nuclei with powdery chromatin and intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions, irregular nuclear outlines, and nuclear grooves (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7). Hurthle cell changes were noted in three cases. Two patients had cervical lymphadenopathy along with thyroid enlargement, where the smears from the cervical lymph nodes showed metastatic deposits of papillary carcinoma.

One case of anaplastic carcinoma was diagnosed, showing high cellularity. The tumour cells were large and arranged in sheets. These cells had pleomorphic nuclei with prominent nucleoli. A few mitotic figures were seen. Tumour giant cells were also observed in some areas (Table/Fig 8).

A specimen was considered adequate if it contained atleast six groups of benign follicular cells, with each group containing atleast ten cells. In this study, 19 cases were placed in the non-diagnostic or unsatisfactory category due to repeated haemorrhagic aspirate, thick smears, and poorly preserved cell morphology.

Out of 540 cases of FNAC, histopathological diagnosis was available in only 61 cases, who underwent subtotal thyroidectomy/total thyroidectomy. Of the 61 cases, 52 (85.25%) were reported as benign, while nine (14.75%) were reported as malignant. The benign lesions (52) comprised nodular goitre (32), follicular adenoma (10), Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (8), thyroglossal cyst (1), and multinodular goitre (1). Among the malignant lesions, eight were diagnosed as papillary carcinoma and one as follicular carcinoma (Table/Fig 9).

The results of FNAC were compared with the corresponding histopathological diagnosis in 61 cases. Cytohistological concordance was found in 59 cases (96.77%), and two cases were discordant. Among the two discordant cases, one false positive case that was reported as FN turned out to be multinodular goitre on Histopathological Examination (HPE), and one false negative case of nodular goitre on cytology was found to be papillary carcinoma on HPE (Table/Fig 10). The results of the present study showed a sensitivity of 94.73%, specificity of 97.61%, and diagnostic accuracy of 96.72%.

Discussion

In thyroid disease, the early diagnosis of lesions is established by FNAC, which is an accurate and relatively precise tool. In this study, thyroid lesions are categorised according to the Bethesda system of reporting and compared with the histopathological report, wherever available, to evaluate the efficacy of this reporting system in interpreting the FNA results. In the present study, the age of the patients ranged from eight years to 74 years, with a mean age of 41 years. The peak incidence was between 20 and 40 years of age, similar to a study conducted by Handa U et al., (8).

Males constituted 8%, whereas females outnumbered males at 92% in the present study. The female-to-male ratio was 11:1, which can be compared to the study by Handa U et al., where the ratio was 6.35:1 (8). Sinna EA and Ezzat N in Egypt revealed that 16.2% of patients in their study were male and 83.8% were female, with a female-to-male ratio of 5.2:1 (9).

A good correlation was found between the occurrence of benign thyroid lesions in the present study and that of Mondal SK et al., They found 87.5% as benign, 1% as atypical FLUS (AFLUS), 4.2% as SFN, 1.4% as SM, 4.7% as malignant, and 1.2% as ND/UNS (1). In the study by Mehra P and Verma AK in New Delhi, 80.0% were diagnosed as benign, 4.9% AUS/FLUS, 2.2% FN, 3.5% SFM, 2.2% malignant, and 7.2% ND/UNS (10). Another study by Theoharis CG et al., demonstrated that 11.1% were unsatisfactory, 73.8% benign, 3% indeterminate, 5.5% FN, 1.3% SM, and 5.2% malignant (11). However, compared to the present study, Jo VY et al., (59%) and Yassa L et al., (66%) have reported fewer benign thyroid lesions (12),(13).

In the present study, benign lesions are high as the institution treats patients who are referred and those who come directly without a referral. A second reason is the fact that FNAC is performed free of cost for the economically backward sections of society.

The benign diagnosis in the study included 216 cases (45.38%) of colloid goitre and 69 cases (14.49%) of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. The malignant diagnosis included 12 cases (85.71%) of papillary carcinoma, one case (7.14%) of poorly differentiated carcinoma, and one case (7.14%) of anaplastic carcinoma. Whereas in the study done by Mondal SK et al., the benign diagnosis were 81.18% colloid/adenomatoid nodule and 17.69% Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and the malignant diagnosis were 87.5% papillary carcinoma, 2.08% follicular variant of papillary carcinoma, 4.16% medullary carcinoma thyroid, 4.16% poorly differentiated carcinoma, and 2.08% anaplastic carcinoma (1).

In the study conducted by Mehra P and Verma AK, 76.7% of total benign cases were reported as benign follicular nodules, and 20% of cases as lymphocytic thyroiditis (10). The malignant category included 80% of cases of papillary carcinoma and 20% of cases of medullary thyroid carcinoma. The number of cases diagnosed was lower in the non-diagnostic and FLUS categories in the present study because the experienced cytopathologist himself performed the FNAC with all the standard procedures. Sample adequacy is contributed by factors like cellularity and the experience of the aspirator. Ultrasound-guided FNA plays an important role in extracting samples from small thyroid nodules. A lower number of cases were diagnosed under the FLUS category due to the cytopathologist’s efforts to avoid ambiguity and minimise the use of AUS/FLUS. A lower percentage of non-diagnostic and AUS/FLUS cases were also reported by Mondal SK et al., and Likhar KS et al., (1),(14).

Thyroid lesions diagnosed as “SM” in the present study accounted for only 0.56% of total cases, similar to the studies by Mondal SK et al., and Sarkis LM et al., who reported 1.4% and 0.8% of cases as SM, respectively (1),(15). A higher number (9%) of cases were reported as suspicious of malignancy in the study by Yassa L et al., (13). It was found that 4.07% of cases were classified as FN, which is consistent with the studies by Mondal SK et al., (4.2%), Theoharis CG et al., (5.5%), and Sarkis LM et al., (4.7%) (1),(11),(15).

False positive and false negative results can be calculated based on the comparison of cytological and histopathological diagnosis. A comparison was done for only 61 cases, where a discrepancy was found in two cases. In the first case, the cytological findings suggested nodular goitre, while the histopathology revealed a focus of papillary carcinoma in a multinodular goitre, resulting in a false negative diagnosis. The reason for this discrepancy was that the aspirate was taken from the cystic area rather than the cellular area, and the smear showed few follicular cells and cystic macrophages with more colloid material, leading to misinterpretation as nodular goitre. In the second case, FNAC findings suggested FN, but histopathology diagnosed it as multinodular goitre. In this case, the aspirate might have been taken from the hypercellular areas of colloid nodule, resulting in an overdiagnosis as FN.

One case of FN, which was diagnosed cytologically, turned out to be follicular carcinoma on histopathology. Follicular adenoma cannot be differentiated from carcinoma based only on the cytological findings because vascular or capsular invasion or intrathyroid spread cannot be evaluated on cytology. Hence, this is considered a true positive case without any discordance. FNAC sensitivity ranges from 80% to 98%, and specificity ranges from 58% to 100% (8). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in our study were 94.73%, 97.61%, and 96.72%, respectively, which were comparable to other studies (Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12) (8),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23).

The results of the present study were comparable with other past and recently published data, and FNAC is now considered a good screening test in diagnosing various lesions of the thyroid.

The limitations of FNAC include obtaining inadequate specimens, the skill and experience of the pathologist in aspirating the sample, and the inability to distinguish between benign and malignant follicular lesions. In cytology, cystic changes in thyroid lesions can lead to diagnostic errors. All these factors can result in false positive and false negative results; thus, pathologists should be aware of the diagnostic pitfalls to make an accurate diagnosis. Sample yield is improved with the help of USG-guided FNAC, minimising diagnostic errors.

Limitation(s)

Clinical and radiological details were not available for a few cases, leading to slight difficulty in categorising the aspirates.

Conclusion

The FNAC is a reliable and powerful diagnostic tool used in preoperative screening to distinguish between benign and malignant thyroid lesions. It is a cost-effective test with improved clinical significance and high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing the nature of the lesion. The Bethesda system provides standard guidelines for reporting thyroid cytopathology, leading to more efficient management of patients with thyroid lesions. More studies on a larger number of cases are needed to validate this reporting system. Ultrasound-guided FNA procedures, expert cytopathologists to interpret the smears, and immunohistochemical and molecular markers are needed to overcome diagnostic errors.

References

1.
Mondal SK, Sinha S, Basak B, Roy DN, Sinha SK. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid fine needle aspirates: A cytologic study with histologic follow-up. J Cytol. 2013;30(2):94-99. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN, Whitakar D. In: Manual and Atlas of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. 4th ed. New Delhi: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 125 64. Available from: https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/a-manual-and-atlas-of-fine-needle-aspiration-cytology.
3.
Kumar S, Aqil S, Dahar A. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid diseases. J Surg Pak. 2008;13(1):22-25. [crossref]
4.
Bajaj Y, De M, Thompson A. Fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis and management of thyroid disease. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(6):467-69. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Pandey P, Dixit A, Mahajan NC. Fine needle aspiration of the thyroid: A cytohistologic correlation with critical evaluation of discordant cases. Thyroid Res Pract. 2012;9(2):32 39. [crossref]
6.
Cibas ES, Ali SZ, NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(5):658 65. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1341 46. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Handa U, Garg S, Mohan H, Nagarkar N. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis and management of thyroid lesions; A study of 434 cases. J Cytol. 2008;25:13 17. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jocy/fulltext/2008/25010/role_of_fine_needle_aspiration_cytology_in.4.aspx#:~:text=FNAC%20is%20a %20minimally%20invasive,that%20can%20be%20managed%20otherwise.
9.
Sinna EA, Ezzat N. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid lesions. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2012;24(2):63 70. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Mehra P, Verma AK. Thyroid cytopathology reporting by the Bethesda system: A two year prospective study in an academic institution. Patholog Res Int. 2015;2015:240505. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Theoharis CG, Schofield KM, Hammers L, Udelsman R, Chhieng DC. The Bethesda Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Classification System: Year 1 at an Academic Institution. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1215-23. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Jo VY, Stelow EB, Dustin SM, Hanley KZ. Malignancy risk for fine needle aspiration of thyroid lesions according to the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:450 56. Doi: 10.1309/AJCP5N4MTHPAFXFB. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Yassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Gawande AA, et al. Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer. 2007;111(6):508 16. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Likhar KS, Hazari RA, Gupta SG, Shukla U. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid lesions: A hospital based study. Thyroid Res Pract. 2013;10(2):68 71. [crossref]
15.
Sarkis LM, Norlen O, Aniss A, Watson N, Delbridge LW, Sidhu SB, et al. The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies. Pathol. 2014;46(7):592-95. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Guhamallick M, Sengupta S, Bhattacharya NK, Basu N, Roy S, Ghosh AK, et al. Cytodiagnosis of thyroid lesions usefulness and pitfalls: A study of 288 cases. J Cytol. 2008;25(1):06 09. [crossref]
17.
Aravinthan T, Banagala ASK, Gamage KJPK. Use of fine needle aspiration cytology on thyroid lumps. Galle Med J. 2007;12(1):25 27. [crossref]
18.
Cheung YS, Poon CM, Mak SM, Suen MW, Leong HT. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules- how well are we doing? Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(1):12-15.
19.
Bagga PK, Mahajan NC. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid swellings: How useful and accurate is it? Indian J Cancer. 2010;47(4):437-42. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Mandal S, Barman D, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee D, Saha J, Sinhas R, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules- Evaluation of its role in diagnosis and management. J Indian Med Assoc. 2011;109(4):258 61.
21.
Bamanikar S, Soraisham P, Jadhav S, Kumar H, Jadhav P, Bamanikar A. Cyto histology and clinical correlation of thyroid gland lesions: A 3 year study in a tertiary hospital. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2014;3(3):208 12.[crossref]
22.
Sharma R, Verma N, Kaushal V, Sharma DR, Sharma D. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid gland lesions: A study of 200 cases in Himalayan belt. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(3):451-55.
23.
Nandedkar SS, Dixit M, Malukani K, Varma AV, Gambhir S. Evaluation of thyroid lesions by fine-needle aspiration cytology according to bethesda system and its histopathological correlation. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018;8(2):76-82.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/61390.19784

Date of Submission: Nov 12, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 28, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 16, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 10, 2024
• iThenticate Software: May 27, 2024 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 10

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com