Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 227535

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : PD03 - PD06 Full Version

Minimally Invasive Approach to Epiphrenic Oesophageal Diverticulum: A Case Report


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73175.19736
Vaishnavi Reddy, Pushkar Galam, Dakshayani Satish Nirhale, Romi Gaudani, Pragna Puvvada

1. Resident, Department of General Surgery, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Head, Department of General Surgery, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Resident, Department of General Surgery, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Resident, Department of General Surgery, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Pushkar Galam,
Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drpushkargalam@gmail.com; vaishnavi.reddy1996@gmail.com

Abstract

An oesophageal diverticulum is a relatively rare disorder of the oesophagus which results in the outpouching of the oesophageal mucosa through a weak portion within the oesophageal lining. Oesophageal diverticula occur in <1% of the population and are found in approximately 1-3% of those presenting with dysphagia. A 75-year-old male patient came to the surgical Outpatient Department (OPD) with chief complaints of difficulty in swallowing for 2-3 months, initially with solids which later progressed to difficulty in swallowing liquids. He was diagnosed on a Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) scan with a large oesophageal diverticulum arising from the right lower lateral thoracic oesophagus just proximal to the oesophagogastric junction in the retrocardiac region with no filling defect or mucosal thickening. The patient was treated with transhiatal laparoscopic oesophageal diverticulectomy with cardiomyotomy and Dor fundoplication. For symptomatic patients, most often, minimally invasive myotomy and removal of the pouch endoscopically are advised, which may pose a surgical challenge due to the rarity of the disease.

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Minimal access, Oesophagus

Case Report

A 75-year-old male patient presented with a three-month history of progressive dysphagia, initially to solids and later to liquids, accompanied by halitosis, reduced appetite, and significant weight loss. A barium swallow revealed a large oesophageal diverticulum originating from the right lower lateral thoracic oesophagus, just proximal to the oesophagogastric junction in the retrocardiac region, with no filling defects or mucosal thickening (Table/Fig 1). Oesophageal manometry indicated incomplete oesophagogastric emptying and elevated Lower Oesophageal Sphincter (LES) pressure, likely due to compression causing oesophagogastric outflow obstruction and a grade II hiatus hernia. Abdominal and pelvic CT demonstrated a large diverticulum filled with oral contrast and an air-fluid level, measuring approximately 65×52×61 mm, arising from the lower oesophagus in the right para oesophageal region near the oesophagogastric junction, consistent with an epiphrenic diverticulum, with no filling defect, mucosal thickening, or irregularity noted (Table/Fig 2). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy confirmed a large oesophageal diverticulum with antral gastritis.

Following comprehensive evaluation and optimisation, the patient underwent laparoscopic diverticulectomy with cardiomyotomy and Dor fundoplication. The patient was positioned in a 30° reverse Trendelenburg position under general anaesthesia with bilateral lower limb abduction. The pneumoperitoneum was established using a Veress needle, and the camera port was placed to the left of the midline, between the middle and lower thirds of the xiphoid-umbilical line. Operative trocars were positioned cranially to the camera port, near the left and right hypochondria. Additional trocars for assistance were strategically placed.

The procedure began with the release of the gastrocolic and gastrohepatic ligaments, followed by the dissection of the right crus of the diaphragm after detaching the phreno-oesophageal membrane. The dissection extended to the left crus up to the oesophageal ring, and the oesophagus was encircled with umbilical tape via a retro-oesophageal window (Table/Fig 3). Mediastinal dissection was conducted using a harmonic scalpel around the diverticulum. A linear endoscopic stapler with a 45 mm cartridge was utilised for diverticulectomy after complete dissection of the diverticulum neck. Cardiomyotomy was performed from 2 cm above the gastroesophageal junction to 4 cm below to alleviate sphincter pressure (Table/Fig 4). An anterior 90° fundoplication was subsequently executed. The excised specimen was sent for histopathological examination (Table/Fig 5). The sections showed a diverticulum lined by hyperplastic stratified squamous epithelium with wall thickening and focal infiltration by lymphocytes and plasma cells with multiple foci of submucosal gastric glands. These findings are consistent with a chronically inflamed oesophageal diverticulum.

Postoperatively, the patient was maintained on a liquid diet for 14 days. A dye study on postoperative day 10 showed no leaks (Table/Fig 6). The patient was gradually advanced to a full diet, prescribed a double dose of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI), and discharged. At a two-month follow-up, the patient tolerated a full diet with complete resolution of symptoms.

Discussion

Oesophageal diverticula are mucosal and submucosal protrusions through the muscular layer of the oesophagus, typically arising due to increased intraluminal pressure and associated with oesophageal motility disorders (1). Epiphrenic diverticula, a subtype of pulsion diverticula, predominantly occur within the distal 10-15 cm of the oesophagus and are frequently linked to primary oesophageal motility disorders such as achalasia, nutcracker oesophagus, or diffuse oesophageal spasm. These diverticula are relatively rare, with an occurrence rate of <2%, and are symptomatic in <1% of the population, predominantly presenting with dysphagia (2). Epiphrenic diverticula are typically pulsion diverticula that are formed as a result of increased intraluminal pressure that is a result of oesophageal motility disorders such as achalasia, diffuse oesophageal spasm, or hypertensive LES. The diverticulum is typically formed on the right posterior side of the oesophagus when the oesophageal membrane weakens and protrudes. The development of these diverticula is strongly associated with oesophageal motility disorders, as emphasised by studies conducted by Gockel I et al., and Herbella FAM et al., (3),(4). Patients with epiphrenic diverticula frequently exhibit symptoms that are non specific and may resemble those of other oesophageal conditions. The most prevalent symptom is dysphagia, followed by regurgitation of undigested food, chest discomfort, and weight loss (4). In certain instances, patients may experience respiratory symptoms as a result of aspiration. Symptomatic patients frequently have more severe underlying motility disorders and larger diverticula.

Surgical intervention is frequently necessary for patients who are symptomatic or have complications such as oesophagitis or aspiration. The conventional method of surgery has been traditional open surgery, which involves a thoracotomy or laparotomy. Katada N et al., have described diverticulectomy, myotomy of the lower oesophagus, and occasionally a partial fundoplication as techniques for preventing reflux (5). The prevalence of minimally invasive surgical methods, such as laparoscopic or thoracoscopic surgery, has been attributed to their quicker recovery times and reduced morbidity. The efficacy and safety of these techniques have been demonstrated in numerous studies, such as those conducted by Kent MS et al., and Rossetti G et al., (6),(7). Endoscopic remedies, such as flexible endoscopic septotomy, have also been investigated for patients who are not suitable for surgery. The long-term results of surgical treatment for epiphrenic diverticula are generally favourable, with a substantial improvement in quality of life and significant symptom relief (7). Nevertheless, symptoms may recur, particularly if the underlying motility disorder is not adequately addressed. Chan SM et al., conducted research that indicates a comprehensive treatment plan, which includes myotomy, can substantially reduce recurrence rates (8).

Epiphrenic diverticula are commonly located on the right posterolateral wall of the oesophagus and can be diagnosed through barium studies, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, oesophageal manometry, and CT imaging. They are often symptomatic when larger than 5 cm, presenting with dysphagia, halitosis, weight loss, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, retrosternal pain, regurgitation, and potentially severe complications such as recurrent respiratory infections and aspiration pneumonia (9). Initial management strategies were conservative, emphasising dietary modifications and symptomatic relief. These early interventions aimed to alleviate discomfort without surgical intervention due to the high-risks associated with the surgical procedures available. Open thoracotomy or cervical approaches were employed in the coming decade, depending on the diverticulum’s location (9). Surgeons performed diverticulectomy, the resection of the diverticulum, or diverticulopexy, suspending the diverticulum to prevent food stasis (10). These early surgeries carried significant risks, including high morbidity and mortality due to infection, leakage, and the rudimentary nature of surgical techniques and instruments.

Advancements in the mid-20th century brought significant improvements in anaesthesia, aseptic techniques, and surgical instrumentation, reducing the complications associated with open surgeries. During this period, combining diverticulectomy with myotomy, particularly for epiphrenic diverticula, became a standard practice to address underlying motility disorders and reduce recurrence rates. The thoracotomy traditional method enables the precise manipulation of the oesophageal diverticulum by providing excellent visualisation and control. It is especially beneficial for diverticula that are large or intricate, as it necessitates detailed anatomical access (11). Thoracotomy offers the capacity to effectively manage complications and the comprehensive management of adjacent structures. Nevertheless, thoracotomy is a highly invasive procedure that results in a prolonged recovery period, significant postoperative discomfort, and lengthier hospital stays. There is an elevated likelihood of complications, including infection, respiratory issues, and fibrosis, for patients (11). In the present case scenario, the patient already had interstitial fibrosis secondary to advanced age, this would prove as a deterring factor in opting for this approach.

Another alternative open approach is laparotomy. The oesophagus is typically accessed through an abdominal incision during laparotomy, a procedure that is typically employed to treat diverticula that are situated near the gastroesophageal junction. This method mitigates the risk of pulmonary complications by avoiding the necessity of opening the thoracic cavity, which is especially advantageous for patients with underlying lung disease. Laparotomy is a versatile procedure which may be suitable in cases where surgeons are not so proficient with the laparoscopic approach, that can be combined with other procedures, such as antireflux surgery, to provide effective access to the lower oesophagus. Although less invasive than a thoracotomy, laparotomy still necessitates a prolonged recuperation period and substantial postoperative distress when contrasted with minimally invasive techniques. It may complicate the procedure, particularly in complex cases, as it offers less direct visualisation of the oesophagus (11).

Following a revolutionary shift with the advent of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgeries transformed the surgical landscape by reducing postoperative pain, shortening hospital stays, and accelerating recovery times compared to traditional open surgery (11). Laparoscopic approaches to oesophageal diverticulectomy allowed for precise resection of the diverticulum with minimal invasiveness (11). Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) emerged as an alternative approach, particularly beneficial for diverticula in the middle and upper thoracic oesophagus. These laparoscopic techniques have been further refined. Laparoscopic transhiatal diverticulectomy with cardiomyotomy and anterior 90° Dor fundoplication has become the standard for symptomatic epiphrenic diverticula (12). This method offers excellent outcomes with low complication rates. The introduction of robotic-assisted surgery has further refined treatment by providing enhanced precision, improved dexterity, and better visualisation, especially in complex cases. Endoscopic techniques, such as Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and endoscopic diverticulotomy, have emerged as less invasive options, particularly for Zenker’s diverticulum, offering shorter recovery times for high-risk patients (13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18). Due to the patient’s advanced age, the extent of the diverticulum, chronicity of symptoms, and the elevated oesophageal pressure, the decision was made to proceed with laparoscopic surgery in this case.

VATS employs a thoracoscope to visualise the oesophagus through small incisions, offering a minimally invasive alternative to open thoracotomy. This approach ensures quicker recovery, less scarring, and reduced postoperative discomfort. Enhanced visualisation with the thoracoscopic camera improves surgical precision, resulting in shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. However, VATS requires specialised skills and equipment, limiting its availability. It may be less effective for large or complex diverticula. Conversely, the transhiatal approach accesses the oesophagus via the abdomen and neck, avoiding thoracotomy and related complications. Though beneficial for lower oesophageal diverticula and patients with lung disease, it offers less direct visualisation and can lead to a longer recovery (15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20).

Current trends focus on hybrid procedures, combining endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical techniques to maximise benefits and further reduce complications. Addressing underlying oesophageal motility disorders through comprehensive preoperative evaluation with manometry and targeted surgical interventions like myotomy is emphasised to prevent recurrence and improve long-term outcomes. The surgical management of oesophageal diverticula has undergone significant evolution over the past century. Transitioning from high-risk open surgeries to advanced minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques, the focus has shifted towards reducing complications, improving recovery times, and addressing underlying oesophageal motility disorders (16).

Due to the rarity of the condition and potential postoperative complications, surgical intervention is often recommended for patients experiencing worsening symptoms. Surgical options include a transhiatal approach or a transthoracic approach for diverticulectomy, often followed by a cardiomyotomy and an antireflux procedure (16). Patients with severe pulmonary symptoms, particularly those with life-threatening aspiration, should not be treated conservatively (16). Laparoscopic transhiatal diverticulectomy with cardiomyotomy and an anterior 90° Dor fundoplication is currently favoured (17),(18),(19),(20),(21). This approach offers advantages such as improved alignment of the stapler cartridge with the oesophageal axis, better visualisation of the oesophagogastric junction for myotomy, easier access for crural repair and antireflux procedures, and facilitation of the proximal myotomy extending high into the mediastinum above the diverticular neck (21). Postoperative follow-up is crucial due to the risk of complications such as stapler line leaks, inflammation, ulceration, abscesses, fistulas, and empyema. Minimally invasive techniques, including laparoscopic and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches, have become popular options for surgical treatment of epiphrenic diverticula, allowing for treatment even in cases of large diverticula of the lower thoracic oesophagus (14).

Conclusion

Given the rarity of oesophageal diverticula, thorough evaluation is imperative for patients presenting with dysphagia. Minimally invasive surgical interventions, including myotomy and endoscopic pouch removal, are recommended for symptomatic patients. Despite the challenges posed by the infrequency of this condition, such surgical procedures are crucial for effective management and symptom resolution.

References

1.
Mittal RK, Bhalla V. Oesophageal diverticula. In: Yamada T, editor. Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology. 6th ed. Wiley; 2021. p. 1117-30.
2.
Herbella FAM, Patti MG. Achalasia and other oesophageal motility disorders. In: Brunicardi FC, editor. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 11th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2020. p. 1055-70.
3.
Gockel I, Junginger T, Eckardt VF. Effects of pneumatic dilation and myotomy on esophageal function and morphology in patients with achalasia. Am Surg. 2005;71(2):128-31. PMID: 16022011. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Herbella FAM, Dubecz A, Patti MG. Esophageal diverticula and cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(2):153-58. Doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01226.x. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Katada N, Sakuramoto S, Kobayashi N, Futawatari N, Kuroyama S, Kikuchi S, et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication for achalasia straightens the esophagus and relieves dysphagia. Am J Surg. 2006;192(1):1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.027. PMID: 16769266. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kent MS, Schuchert M, Fernando H, Luketich JD. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: state of the art. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00555.x. PMID: 16722989. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Rossetti G, Fei L, del Genio G, Maffettone V, Brusciano L, Tolone S, et al. Epiphrenic diverticula mini-invasive surgery: A challenge for expert surgeons--personal experience and review of the literature. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):129-35. Doi: 10.1177/1457496913482242. PMID: 23820690.[crossref][PubMed]
8.
Chan SM, Wu JC, Teoh AY, Yip HC, Ng EK, Lau JY, et al. Comparison of early outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy to peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(1):27-32. Doi: 10.1111/den.12507. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Zeng X, Bai S, Zhang Y, Ye L, Yuan X, Hu B. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal diverticulum: an experience in China. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(5):1990-96. Doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07593-6. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PMID: 32347387. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Fabian E, Eherer AJ, Lackner C, Urban C, Smolle-Juettner FM, Krejs GJ. Pseudoachalasia as First Manifestation of a Malignancy. Dig Dis. 2019;37(5):347- 54. Doi: 10.1159/000495758. Epub 2019 Jan 2. PMID: 30602160. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bonavina L, Rottoli M, Bona D, Siboni S, Russo IS, Bernardi D. Transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum: Effect of the traction suture-assisted technique on long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2856-61. Doi: 10.1007/s00464- 012-2261-0. Epub 2012 Apr 27. PMID: 22538675. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Belsey R. Recent progress in oesophageal surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 1972;71(4):230- 38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4631755/ PMID: 4631755.
13.
Herbella FA, Patti MG. Modern pathophysiology and treatment of esophageal diverticula. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(1):29-35. Doi: 10.1007/s00423- 011-0843-2. Epub 2011 Sep 2. PMID: 21887578. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Debas HT, Payne WS, Cameron AJ, Carlson HC. Physiopathology of lower oesophageal diverticulum and its implications for treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980;151(5):593-600.
15.
Streitz Jr JM, Glick ME, Ellis Jr FH. Selective use of myotomy for treatment of epiphrenic diverticula: Manometric and clinical analysis. Arch Surg. 1992;127(5):585-87. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Benacci JC, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Allen MS, Daly RC, Pairolero PC. Epiphrenic diverticulum: Results of surgical treatment. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55(5):1109-13. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Eypasch E, Barlow A. Surgery for oesophageal diverticula. In: Bremner CG, DeMeester TR, Peracchia A, editors. Modern approach to benign oesophageal disease. St. Louis: QMP Inc.; 1995. p. 143-153.
18.
Orringer MB. Epiphrenic diverticula: Fact and fable. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55(5):1067-68. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Evander A, Little AG, Ferguson MK, Skinner DB. Diverticula of the mid- and lower oesophagus: Pathogenesis and surgical management. World J Surg. 1986;10(5):820-28. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sato H, Takeuchi M, Hashimoto S, Mizuno KI, Furukawa K, Sato A, et al. Oesophageal diverticulum: New perspectives in the era of minimally invasive endoscopic treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(12):1457-64. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Abdollahimohammad A, Masinaeinezhad N, Firouzkouhi M. Epiphrenic oesophageal diverticula. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(8):795-97.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73175.19736

Date of Submission: May 30, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jun 13, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 29, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 03, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jun 14, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 28, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com