Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 509111

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2025 | Month : August | Volume : 19 | Issue : 8 | Page : UD01 - UD03 Full Version

Anaesthetic Considerations in Myasthenia Gravis: Strategies to Mitigate Cholinergic Crisis during Thymectomy


Published: August 1, 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2025/79898.21295
Chhaya Mahesh Suryawanshi, Jekha Mary Babu

1. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jekha Mary Babu,
Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jekha1411@gmail.com

Abstract

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterised by muscle weakness due to antibodies directed against acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction. Patients with MG presents with significant anaesthetic challenges, including prolonged neuromuscular blockade, higher risk for perioperative myasthenic or cholinergic crises and risk of postoperative respiratory failure, chances of delayed extubation, potential need for postoperative ventilator support and risks associated due to close proximity to mediastinal structures. Thymectomy is the key treatment for MG and these challenges are to be anticipated during procedures like Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy (VATS). We present the anaesthetic management of a 24-year-old female with MG and co-existing hypothyroidism, who underwent laparoscopic VATS. Anaesthesia was induced using a non-depolarising muscle relaxant under neuromuscular monitoring, along with thoracic epidural analgesia and left-sided Double Lumen Tube (DLT) to facilitate one lung ventilation. Despite thorough preoperative optimisation, the patient exhibited intraoperative signs suggestive of cholinergic crisis, most likely due to excessive anticholinesterase therapy. The crisis was promptly recognised and effectively managed by providing appropriate supportive care and discontinuing anticholinesterase therapy. Postoperatively, the patient was extubated successfully without the need for ventilator support. This case emphasises the critical role of comprehensive preoperative assessment, vigilant intraoperative monitoring, and the ability to accurately distinguish between myasthenic and cholinergic crises. It also illustrates the anaesthetic challenges associated in managing MG, particularly in patients with coexisting endocrine disorders such as hypothyroidism. Timely recognition and a tailored anaesthetic approach are essential for optimising outcomes in such complex cases.

Keywords

Double lumen tube, Myasthenia crisis, One lung ventilation, Video-assisted thymectomy

Case Report

A 24-year-old female with a 5-year history of MG, classified as Osserman type IIB presented with ptosis, dysphagia, difficulty with chewing, and both limb weakness. Her medications included Pyridostigmine 60 mg four times daily, Prednisolone 40 mg once daily, Azathioprine 50 mg twice daily, and Thyroxine 75 mcg once daily for her co-existing hypothyroidism. She had a myasthenic crisis three years prior, which was managed with mechanical ventilation, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis. Preoperative assessment revealed generalised muscle weakness with prominent ocular and bulbar involvement. Respiratory function remained stable; pulmonary function tests, including vital capacity, negative inspiratory force, and peak expiratory flow rate, were all within normal limits.

She was started on preoperative respiratory physiotherapy and incentive spirometry to enhance and preserve pulmonary function. Routine investigations, including chest X-ray and echocardiography were normal. Acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) antibody titers were elevated – 13.31 nmol/L (reference value ≤0.02 nmol/L). Repetitive nerve stimulation test showed a decremental response in the orbicularis oculi muscle. Computed tomography revealed thymic tissue of 5×1.3×3 cm in the anterior mediastinum. In view of her clinical status, she underwent plasmapheresis two weeks prior to surgery to reduce risk of perioperative complications. She was scheduled for laparoscopic VATS and pyridostigmine was discontinued on the morning of surgery. The anaesthesia plan comprised – thoracic epidural analgesia and one-lung ventilation, with restricted use of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (NMBA). Considering the patient’s prior crisis history and moderate disease severity, elective postoperative ventilation was considered, and an ICU bed was reserved for close monitoring. Difficult airway cart was prepared, and aspiration prophylaxis was initiated. During anaesthesia induction, the patient was closely monitored for respiratory compromise, with no adverse responses observed.

Upon arrival in the operating theater, standard monitors were connected, and thoracic epidural catheter was fixed at T3-T4 level. The patient was preoxygenated and premedicated with glycopyrrolate 0.004 mg/kg, midazolam 0.01 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg, metoclopramide 0.1 mg/kg, and hydrocortisone 2 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and propofol 2 mg/kg, followed by bag-mask ventilation with 100% oxygen, atracurium 0.3 mg/kg, and endotracheal intubation using a 37F left-sided (Robertshaw) DLT. The patient was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position for one lung ventilation, with low tidal volume (6 mL/kg), Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, and intraoperative recruitment maneuvers. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, oxygen, air, fentanyl boluses, and Train-Of-Four (TOF) guided atracurium boluses (0.1 mg/kg, one-fifth the standard dose). The left radial artery was cannulated for invasive blood pressure monitoring. For intraoperative analgesia, 6 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 mg of morphine was infused, followed by continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine through the epidural catheter at 3 mL/hr. Intraoperatively, vitals, pulse oximetry, and capnography were continuously monitored. The patient received 1200 mL of isotonic saline, with an estimated blood loss of 80 mL. Strict control of arterial blood gases was maintained. Throughout the procedure vital parameters remained stable, heart rate of 74 beats/min, blood pressure at 125/82 mmHg, end-tidal CO2 of 34 mmHg, respiratory rate of 12 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation of 99%. VATS was completed, and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination.

At the end of the procedure, the DLT was replaced with 7.0 size endotracheal tube to facilitate continued monitoring. Once the patient resumed spontaneous respiration and TOF ratio was >0.9, neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.008 mg/kg. Subsequently, the patient developed bradycardia (48 beats/min), excessive oral secretions, and tachypnoea (32 breaths/min). Pupillary constriction was also noted. Cholinergic crisis was suspected, and intravenous atropine 1.8 mg (0.03 mg/kg) was administered, followed by thorough oral suctioning. The patient was supported with ventilation till secretions ceased and vitally stable; she was extubated cautiously after meeting extubation criteria. Post-extubation, the patient was transferred to the surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU), where her vitals remained stable and was continued on supplemental oxygen. Emergency reintubation equipments and difficult airway cart were kept standby at the bedside. She remained haemodynamically stable and maintained satisfactory blood gas status, and required no anticholinesterase drugs during this period.

Discussion

A comprehensive preoperative anaesthetic evaluation encompassing disease severity, ongoing treatment, respiratory function, and bulbar involvement is essential for MG patients undergoing thymectomy (1). Optimisation includes respiratory and chest physiotherapy, and in high-risk cases, plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin is recommended to reduce perioperative complications. Respiratory muscle weakness increases the risk of pulmonary complications - atelectasis and aspiration, often necessitating prolonged postoperative ventilation. Additionally, due to autoantibodies targeting adrenergic receptors, these patients have a higher risk of cardiac involvement, making preoperative cardiovascular assessment crucial (2). Surgical outcomes are more favourable when performed during the stable phase of MG, with minimal reliance on immunomodulatory therapy and glucocorticoids, thereby reducing the risk of perioperative myasthenic crisis. In patients with pulmonary or bulbar involvement, steroid therapy and premedication with proton pump inhibitors or prokinetics is recommended to minimise aspiration risk (1).

In the index case, morning dose of Pyridostigmine (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors - AChEI)) was withheld. Nagre AS et al., reported that continued administration until the morning of surgery may increase acetylcholine availability at the neuromuscular junction, leading to an altered response to NMBAs (3). Additionally, Gajendran R et al., and Sanders DB et al., noted that it might interfere with NMBA reversal (2),(4). However, Pal A et al., cautions that withholding anticholinesterases can cause respiratory and bulbar weakness in dependent patients (1). Therefore, the decision should be individualised based on the preoperative disease stability of each patient before surgery.

The MG patients are highly sensitive to non-depolarising NMBAs; even small doses can cause respiratory compromise or impair airway protection (5). TOF monitoring is essential to guide dosing and avoid prolonged neuromuscular blockade (6). Rapid neuromuscular recovery has been observed in MG patients receiving rocuronium when reversed with sugammadex (2 mg/kg), making this a safer option when neuromuscular relaxation is necessary (7). According to Pal A et al., incremental doses of atracurium can also be safely used for neuromuscular blockade (1). In the present case, blockade was achieved with incremental doses of atracurium, which showed a prolonged effect compared to patients without MG reversal of steroidal NMBA, sugammadex is the agent of choice. While neostigmine may be used, lower-than-standard doses are recommended due to the risk of cholinergic crisis (8). Kumar P et al., reported that inhalational and Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) using agents like propofol and sevoflurane, without NMBA, can provide sufficient relaxation and facilitate early extubation, minimising the need for postoperative ventilation (9). Similarly, Uchida S et al., managed a case of subclinical MG with thymoma with total intravenous propofol and remifentanil to assess the effect of neuromuscular effects of rocuronium (5). Kiran U et al., also documented successful thymectomy using sevoflurane as the sole anaesthetic agent in a paediatric patient with juvenile MG and thymoma (10).

Myasthenic patients with ocular MG or in remission, exhibit resistance to depolarising NMBA - succinylcholine, due to a reduced number of Acetylcholine Receptors (AChRs). Pyridostigmine may further prolong action of succinylcholine by inhibiting plasma cholinesterase, and repeated doses can result in a phase II block (11). Hence, succinylcholine should be avoided unless airway management is anticipated to be difficult.

During one-lung ventilation for thymectomy, lung-protective strategies are critical to minimise atelectasis and ensure adequate oxygenation. These include low tidal volumes (4-6 mL/kg), appropriate PEEP (5-8 cmH2O), low FiO2, pressure-controlled ventilation, and alveolar recruitment manoeuvers (12).

Excess dosage of AChEI can lead to cholinergic crisis, caused by excessive Acetylcholine (ACh) and overstimulation of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors at the neuromuscular junction. Symptoms include salivation, lacrimation, urination, diarrhoea, gastrointestinal cramps, emesis, miosis, muscle weakness, fasciculations, respiratory paralysis, and blurred vision. Differentiating between myasthenic and cholinergic crises is crucial; using the edrophonium test intravenously (2 mg). If there is clinical improvement of symptoms, it is due to myasthenic crisis, and if there is worsening of symptoms, it is due to cholinergic crisis. Myasthenic crisis can be managed with AChEI to enhance neuromuscular transmission. Whereas cholinergic crisis results from excessive AChEI use, overstimulating cholinergic receptors. Management of cholinergic crisis includes airway protection, secretion clearance, and haemodynamic stabilisation and the antidote - intravenous atropine 0.03 mg/kg, which blocks muscarinic receptors. It should be titrated until signs of atropinisation (tachycardia, mydriasis, warm skin) are observed. Pralidoxime reverses nicotinic effects, particularly respiratory weakness and should be continued until muscle strength improves (13).

Patients with bulbar and respiratory involvement face greater risk of delayed extubation due to aspiration and compromised postoperative respiratory function. Incomplete reversal may result in delayed recovery, prolonged ventilation, and respiratory failure. Fluctuating muscle weakness in MG, particularly involving the diaphragm and intercostals impairs ventilation. Hence, adequate reversal is essential in these patients. Neostigmine carries a risk of cholinergic crisis, making sugammadex the preferred agent for reversing steroidal NMBA (5),(11).

These patients often have reduced respiratory reserve, necessitating vigilant monitoring and strict extubation criteria, including adequate tidal volume, oxygenation, ventilation, and consciousness. Postoperatively, careful weaning from mechanical ventilation and monitoring for respiratory insufficiency are crucial. Extubation criteria for MG patients include: 1) adequate level of consciousness; 2) tidal volume >5 mL/kg; 3) PaCO2 <50 mmHg; 4) PaO2 >90 mmHg; and 5) respiratory rate <30 breaths/min. In our case, careful monitoring and timely intervention ensured airway clearance, stabilised respiratory status, and prevented aspiration, facilitating smooth transition from mechanical ventilation to spontaneous breathing.

Conclusion

Careful preoperative evaluation, understanding of disease pathophysiology, and multidisciplinary approach, combined with a balanced anaesthesia technique minimising inhalational anaesthetics and muscle relaxants, enabled extubation on the operating table and ensured a safe outcome in this complex case. Awareness and prompt management of perioperative myasthenic and cholinergic crises remain essential. Although NMBA are ideally avoided in MG, the use of rocuronium with sugammadex for rapid reversal shows significant results, but warrants further investigation to establish standardised protocols on dosages. Future research should also compare the efficacy and safety of inhalational agents such as sevoflurane, either alone or combined with TIVA. Pyridostigmine dosing should be carefully adjusted to balance the risk of myasthenic crisis against cholinergic toxicity and while continuation of anticholinesterases appears preliminarily safe, larger controlled studies are required to confirm their tolerability and impact on outcomes.

References

1.
Pal A, Gogia V, Mehra C. Perioperative challenges and neuromuscular blockade concerns in robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70(5):549-52. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gajendran R, Suresh V, Thomas S. Anesthesia considerations in myasthenia gravis: A review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019;47(5):378-89.
3.
Nagre AS, Kabade A, Chaudhari M. Perioperative management of myasthenia gravis patient for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and thymectomy. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022;25(2):236-39. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Sanders DB, Hart I. Myasthenia gravis: Current perspectives and management. J Neurol. 2016;263:1181-89.
5.
Uchida S, Kudo R, Takekawa D, Hirota K. Anesthetic management of a patient with subclinical myasthenia gravis who underwent a thymectomy: A case report. JA Clin Rep. 2022;8:49. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Newhouse D, Shah A, Patel S. Anesthesia and myasthenia gravis: Approaches to anesthetic management. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27(6):470-75.
7.
Escobar IC, Valdes JE. Perioperative management of myasthenic patients. J Muscle Health. 2017;1(1):1002.
8.
Balaka C, Poulida S, Miliatou M, Roussakis A, Lavranou V, Moshaki M, et al. Comparison of sugammadex to neostigmine reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(3 Suppl):S22-3. [crossref]
9.
Kumar P, Malik R, Kumar S, Kumar S. Anesthetic management of myasthenia gravis patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using proseal laryngeal mask airway. Int J Curr Res. 2017;9(2):46908-09.
10.
Kiran U, Choudhury M, Saxena N, Kapoor P. Sevoflurane as a sole anaesthetic agent for thymectomy in myasthenia gravis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:351-53. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Hubbell G, Slomowitz S, Thornton I. Prolonged neuromuscular blockade following succinylcholine administration and the clinical importance of family history: A case report. Cureus. 2025;17(2):e78814. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Gao S, Zhang Z, Brunelli A, Chen C, Chen C, Chen G, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for mechanical ventilation management for patients undergoing lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(9):3246-54. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Adeyinka A, Kondamudi NP. Cholinergic crisis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [updated 2023 Aug 12].

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2025/79898.21295

Date of Submission: Apr 13, 2025
Date of Peer Review: May 02, 2025
Date of Acceptance: May 26, 2025
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 20, 2025
• Manual Googling: May 22, 2025
• iThenticate Software: May 24, 2025 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com