Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 5921

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : BC01 - BC05 Full Version

Role of Serum Ferritin, Vitamin D Status, and C-Reactive Protein in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Case-control Study


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87939.24394
Mary Chandrika Anton, B Shanthi, Vasudevan Elumalai, K Sumathi

1. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Tutor, Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mary Chandrika Anton,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, No. 7 Works Road, Chrompet, Chennai-600044, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: chandrikabiochem@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly prevalent metabolic liver disorder associated with chronic low-grade inflammation. Altered iron metabolism, Vitamin D deficiency, and systemic inflammatory markers have been implicated in its pathogenesis; however, their relationship with disease severity remains incompletely understood.

Aim: To evaluate the association of serum ferritin, Vitamin D status, and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) with the presence and severity of NAFLD.

Materials and Methods: This hospital-based case-control study was conducted at the Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from January 2023 to December 2023. A total of 200 participants were enrolled, including 100 NAFLD patients diagnosed by clinical, biochemical, and ultrasonographic criteria and 100 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Serum ferritin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and CRP levels were estimated using standard laboratory methods. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square/Fisher’s-exact tests were used for group comparisons, while Spearman’s rank correlation was used to assess associations with NAFLD severity.

Results: The mean age of NAFLD patients was 32.27±3.99 years, and that of controls was 31.46±4.19 years, with equal gender distribution in both groups (50 males and 50 females). NAFLD patients had significantly higher median serum ferritin [183.0 (148.0-254.75) vs 145.0 (97.75-236.25) ng/mL; p=0.0001] and CRP levels [6.5 (5.0-9.5) vs 1.5 (0.8-2.0) mg/L; p<0.0001], and significantly lower Vitamin D levels [13.0 (8.57-17.0) vs 24.0 (22.0-30.5) ng/mL; p<0.0001] than controls. Vitamin D deficiency was present in 79% of NAFLD patients. Serum ferritin (r=-0.024, p=0.813) and Vitamin D (r=0.149, p=0.139) showed no significant correlation with NAFLD severity, whereas CRP demonstrated a significant positive correlation (r=0.604, p<0.001).

Conclusion: NAFLD is associated with elevated serum ferritin and CRP levels and reduced Vitamin D concentrations. While ferritin and Vitamin D were associated with the presence of NAFLD, CRP correlated significantly with disease severity, suggesting its potential utility as a marker of disease progression and inflammatory burden.

Keywords

Hepatic steatosis, Hypovitaminosis D, Iron metabolism, Metabolic syndrome, Systemic inflammation

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disorder worldwide and represents the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, encompassing obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (1). The disease spectrum ranges from simple steatosis to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (2). Increasing evidence suggests that chronic low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress play central roles in the initiation and progression of NAFLD, making inflammatory biomarkers crucial for understanding disease pathophysiology and risk stratification (3).

Serum ferritin, traditionally regarded as a marker of iron storage, has emerged as an important acute phase reactant and indicator of systemic inflammation. Elevated ferritin levels are frequently observed in patients with NAFLD and have been associated with hepatic iron deposition, insulin resistance, and increased disease severity (4). Excess iron promotes oxidative stress through the generation of reactive oxygen species, leading to hepatocellular injury, lipid peroxidation, and activation of inflammatory pathways (5). Thus, hyperferritinaemia may reflect both iron overload and inflammatory burden in NAFLD.

Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in patients with NAFLD and is increasingly recognised as a contributor to metabolic and inflammatory dysregulation. Beyond its classical role in calcium homeostasis, Vitamin D exerts immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic effects through regulation of cytokine production and inhibition of hepatic stellate cell activation (6). Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels have been linked to increased hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and progression to NASH, suggesting a potential role in disease severity and prognosis (7).

C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a sensitive marker of systemic inflammation, has been widely studied in metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease. Elevated CRP levels are commonly observed in NAFLD and correlate with obesity, insulin resistance, and hepatic inflammation (8). The combined assessment of CRP with ferritin and Vitamin D status may therefore provide a more comprehensive understanding of the inflammatory and metabolic milieu underlying NAFLD.

Despite accumulating evidence linking iron metabolism, Vitamin D deficiency, and systemic inflammation with NAFLD, several studies have evaluated these biomarkers largely in isolation (9),(10),(11). Previous investigations have demonstrated an association between elevated serum ferritin and disease severity, as well as between low Vitamin D levels and hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance (12),(13),(14). Similarly, increased CRP levels have been reported to reflect systemic inflammation and cardiometabolic risk in NAFLD (15),(16). However, most of these studies have focused on individual biomarkers rather than exploring their combined role within a single patient cohort (17),(18).

The present study differs from previous reports by simultaneously evaluating serum ferritin, Vitamin D status, and CRP in the same NAFLD cohort, providing a more integrated assessment of metabolic and inflammatory interactions. By combining continuous, categorical, and correlation analyses, it offers deeper insight into their interrelationship. This multi-biomarker approach may improve risk stratification and help identify potential therapeutic targets in NAFLD. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the association of serum ferritin, Vitamin D status, and CRP as biomarkers of inflammatory burden in patients with NAFLD. The objectives were to estimate serum ferritin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and CRP levels and assess the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in patients with NAFLD and to evaluate the association with NAFLD.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based case-control study conducted at the Department of Biochemistry, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chrompet, Chennai Tamil Nadu, India, from January 2023 to December 2023. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee and Research Committee of Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital (Approval Reference No: 002/SBMC/IHEC/2021/1662). The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles.

Inclusion criteria:

• For Cases: It included NAFLD individuals aged 20-40 years based on a combination of clinical evaluation, biochemical investigations, and imaging findings. Ultrasonography of the abdomen was used as the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of NAFLD (19),(20). Liver biopsy was not performed due to its invasive nature and higher cost (21).

• For Controls: It consisted of age- and gender-matched healthy individuals without evidence of NAFLD on ultrasonography and without clinical or biochemical features suggestive of liver disease.

Exclusion criteria: Participants were excluded, if they had a history of alcohol consumption, chronic liver disease or liver failure, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, or were receiving steroids or hepatotoxic medications.

Sample size calculation: The sample size for this case-control study was calculated to detect significant differences in biomarker prevalence between NAFLD cases and controls using the formula for comparing two proportions:

n=(Zα/2+Zβ)2×[p1(1-p1)+p2(1-p2)] / (p1-p2)2

n =sample size required per group, Zα/2=1.96 (95% confidence level), Zβ=0.84 (80% power), p1=prevalence among cases, p2=prevalence among controls

Using a 95% confidence level and 80% power, sample sizes were estimated based on reported prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency (45% vs. 25%), elevated serum ferritin (40% vs. 15%), and elevated CRP (50% vs. 30%) among cases and controls, respectively (22).

The largest calculated sample size was 91 participants per group based on CRP. Participants were recruited using consecutive sampling, wherein eligible NAFLD patients attending the outpatient services of the Department of Medicine and apparently healthy age- and gender-matched controls attending routine health examinations were consecutively enrolled until the required sample size of 200 was achieved.

Study Procedure

All participants were informed about the nature and purpose of the study, and written informed consent was obtained before enrolment. A patient information leaflet detailing the objectives and procedures of the study was provided to willing participants. Demographic and clinical details, including age, gender, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), general medical history, family history, medication history, and blood pressure, were recorded. A routine clinical examination was performed for all participants before blood sample collection. Ultrasonographic evaluation was performed to confirm the presence or absence of NAFLD in all study participants (23). NAFLD was diagnosed based on the presence of hepatic steatosis on ultrasonography, characterised by increased hepatic echogenicity compared with the renal cortex, blurring of intrahepatic vessel margins, and deep attenuation of the ultrasound signal, in the absence of significant alcohol intake and other secondary causes of fatty liver disease (24).

Based on the conventional ultrasonographic grading criteria, NAFLD was classified into Grade 0 (normal), Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe) hepatic steatosis (24).

Grade 0 – Normal

Grade 1 (mild) - Represented by slight diffuse increase in fine echoes in the hepatic parenchyma with normal visualisation of the diaphragm and intrahepatic vessel borders.

Grade 2 (moderate) - Represented by a moderate diffuse increase in fine echoes with slightly impaired visualisation of the intrahepatic vessels and diaphragm.

Grade 3 (severe) - Represented by a marked increase in fine echoes with poor or no visualisation of the intrahepatic vessel borders, diaphragm, and posterior portion of the right lobe of the liver.

Anthropometric assessment: Anthropometric measurements including height and weight were obtained using standard procedures, and BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2).

Sample collection: After an overnight fast of 12 hours, approximately 5 mL of venous blood was collected from all participants by aseptic venipuncture using sterile vacutainers. The samples were allowed to clot and were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate serum. The obtained serum was used for biochemical analysis. Serum ferritin levels were measured using a Chemiluminescent Immunoassay (CLIA) method. The normal reference range for ferritin was considered as 30-300 ng/mL for males and 15-150 ng/mL for females, with values >200 ng/mL taken as elevated for analysis. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were estimated by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) Vitamin D status was classified as deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20-29 ng/mL), and sufficient (≥30 ng/mL) (25).C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were determined using a high-sensitivity immunoturbidimetric assay. CRP levels were interpreted as normal (<1 mg/L), low-grade inflammation (1-3 mg/L), and elevated (>3 mg/L) (26),(27). Serum ferritin and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were estimated by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) using commercially available assay kits on a Mindray immunoanalyser (Mindray CL-960i, Shenzhen, China). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay (in Mispa i3) with reagents from Agappe Diagnostics Ltd. All assays were performed strictly according to the respective manufacturer’s instructions, and appropriate internal quality-control procedures were followed to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Data were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. Continuous variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed variables were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), whereas non normally distributed variables were presented as median with interquartile range (IQR). Comparisons between NAFLD cases and healthy controls were performed using the independent t-test for normally distributed variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. Categorical variables, including the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency, elevated ferritin, and raised CRP, were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Correlations between biochemical parameters and NAFLD severity were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The case-control study included a total of 200 participants, comprising 100 patients diagnosed with NAFLD attending the outpatient services of the Department of Medicine and 100 apparently healthy age-matched controls. The significant Shapiro-Wilk test results (p<0.001 for all three biomarkers) indicate deviation from a normal distribution. Hence, non parametric statistical methods were considered appropriate for analysing serum ferritin, Vitamin D, and CRP levels.

The mean age and gender distribution were comparable between NAFLD cases (32.27±3.99 years; 50 males and 50 females) and controls (31.46±4.19 years; 50 males and 50 females) (p>0.05). NAFLD patients had significantly higher BMI compared to controls (p<0.001). Postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly elevated in NAFLD cases, while fasting blood glucose did not show a statistically significant difference. Lipid profile analysis revealed significantly higher total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL levels, along with significantly lower HDL levels in NAFLD patients compared to controls (p<0.001), indicating an adverse metabolic profile (Table/Fig 1).

The majority of participants were classified as Grade 1 (mild steatosis), accounting for 68 (68%) cases, while 22 (22%) had Grade 2 (moderate steatosis) and 10 (10%) had Grade 3 (severe steatosis). These findings indicate that most patients were in the early stage of hepatic steatosis, with a smaller proportion demonstrating advanced disease severity (Table/Fig 2).

Among NAFLD patients, 79 (79%) had Vitamin D deficiency, and 21 (21%) had insufficient levels, while none had sufficient Vitamin D status (Table/Fig 3). Serum ferritin levels were ≥200 ng/mL in 40 (40%) patients, indicating a substantial proportion with elevated iron stores or inflammatory burden. CRP was elevated (>3 mg/L) in 95 (95%) patients, while 5 (5%) had low-grade inflammation and none had normal CRP levels, reflecting marked systemic inflammation in the study group.

A significantly higher proportion of NAFLD patients exhibited Vitamin D deficiency (79%) compared to controls (13%), and this difference was highly significant (χ2=85.04, p<0.001), indicating a strong association between hypovitaminosis D and NAFLD. Although elevated serum ferritin levels were more frequent among NAFLD cases (40%) than controls (31%), this difference did not reach statistical significance (χ2=1.76, p=0.185). In contrast, elevated CRP levels were observed in 95% of NAFLD patients, whereas none of the controls had raised CRP levels (0%), and this association was highly significant on Fisher’s exact testing (p<0.001), reflecting a pronounced inflammatory state in NAFLD (Table/Fig 4).

The Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated significant differences in all three biomarkers between NAFLD cases and controls. NAFLD patients had significantly higher median serum ferritin [183.0 (148.0-254.75) ng/mL] and CRP levels [6.5 (5.0-9.5) mg/L] compared to controls [145.0 (97.75-236.25) ng/mL and 1.5 (0.8-2.0) mg/L, respectively]. Conversely, median Vitamin D levels were significantly lower in NAFLD patients [13.0 (8.57-17.0) ng/mL] than in controls [24.0 (22.0-30.5) ng/mL], indicating increased inflammatory burden and Vitamin D deficiency in NAFLD (Table/Fig 5).

Although mean serum ferritin values showed minor variations across grades (205.4±96.8 ng/mL in Grade 1, 210.7±101.3 ng/mL in Grade 2, and 214.9 ±108.6 ng/mL in Grade 3), the differences were small and did not indicate a consistent relationship with disease severity. Similarly, Vitamin D levels demonstrated only modest variation across grades (13.1±5.7, 14.0±6.1, and 14.6±6.4 ng/mL for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively), suggesting no clear trend with increasing severity. In contrast, CRP levels increased from 6.2±2.4 mg/L in Grade 1 to 9.1±2.8 mg/L in Grade 2 and 12.8±3.1 mg/L in Grade 3, indicating a possible association between systemic inflammation and worsening NAFLD (Table/Fig 6).

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis demonstrated no significant correlation between serum ferritin levels and NAFLD severity (r=-0.024, p=0.813), indicating that ferritin levels did not vary systematically with increasing ultrasonographic grade of NAFLD. No significant correlation was observed between Vitamin D levels and NAFLD severity (r=0.149, p=0.139). In contrast, CRP exhibited a moderately strong positive correlation with NAFLD grade (r=0.604, p<0.001), suggesting that systemic inflammation increases significantly as the severity of hepatic steatosis worsens. These findings indicate that among the biomarkers studied, CRP was the only marker significantly associated with NAFLD severity, whereas serum ferritin and Vitamin D appeared to be associated with the presence of NAFLD rather than the extent of disease severity (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The present case-control study evaluated serum ferritin, Vitamin D status, and CRP as biomarkers of inflammatory burden in patients with NAFLD. The findings demonstrated that NAFLD patients had significantly higher serum ferritin and CRP levels and significantly lower Vitamin D concentrations than healthy controls, highlighting the co-existence of metabolic dysregulation and systemic inflammation in NAFLD.

Serum ferritin levels were significantly higher in NAFLD patients than in controls, supporting previous evidence linking iron metabolism to NAFLD pathogenesis (28),(29),(30). Elevated iron stores may promote oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and insulin resistance, thereby contributing to hepatic injury and disease progression. However, although ferritin levels differed significantly between cases and controls, the proportion of subjects with elevated ferritin (>200 ng/mL) was not significantly different between groups. Furthermore, serum ferritin showed no significant correlation with ultrasonographic NAFLD severity. These findings suggest that ferritin may be associated with the presence of NAFLD and underlying metabolic disturbances but may have limited utility as an indicator of disease severity.

Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent among NAFLD patients, with 79% of cases exhibiting deficient levels. This observation is consistent with previous studies reporting an association between low Vitamin D status and hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and metabolic dysfunction (31),(32),(33). Vitamin D exerts anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects and has been implicated in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. The significantly lower Vitamin D levels observed in NAFLD patients support its potential role in disease susceptibility. However, no significant correlation was observed between Vitamin D levels and NAFLD severity, suggesting that Vitamin D deficiency may be more closely related to disease occurrence than progression.

Among the biomarkers evaluated, CRP emerged as the strongest indicator of disease activity. CRP levels were markedly elevated in NAFLD patients, and 95% of cases exhibited CRP concentrations above the defined cut-off value. In addition, CRP demonstrated a significant positive correlation with NAFLD severity (r=0.604, p<0.001), indicating that systemic inflammation increases with worsening hepatic steatosis. These findings are consistent with previous reports identifying chronic low-grade inflammation as a key driver of NAFLD progression and cardiometabolic complications (34),(35). The absence of significant correlations between NAFLD severity and serum ferritin or Vitamin D levels suggests that these biomarkers may reflect metabolic and inflammatory alterations associated with disease presence rather than disease progression. In contrast, CRP appears to better represent ongoing inflammatory activity and severity of hepatic involvement. Therefore, the combined assessment of serum ferritin, Vitamin D, and CRP may provide complementary information, with ferritin and Vitamin D serving as indicators of disease burden and CRP acting as a marker of disease severity.

Overall, the findings underscore the multifactorial nature of NAFLD and support the integration of inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in its clinical evaluation. Given their affordability and widespread availability, these biomarkers may aid in identifying at-risk individuals and monitoring disease activity. Further longitudinal studies are required to clarify causal relationships and determine whether interventions targeting Vitamin D deficiency, iron dysregulation, and systemic inflammation can improve clinical outcomes in NAFLD.

Limitation(s)

The present study has certain limitations. Its case-control design does not allow the establishment of causal relationships between serum ferritin, Vitamin D, CRP, and NAFLD. The study was conducted at a single tertiary care centre with a relatively modest sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. NAFLD diagnosis and grading were based on ultrasonography rather than liver biopsy, the gold standard for disease assessment. Additionally, the absence of longitudinal follow-up precluded evaluation of temporal changes in biomarker levels and their relationship with disease progression. Fibrosis scores such as FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score, and ELF were not calculated due to lack of required biochemical parameters.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that NAFLD exhibits significantly higher serum ferritin and CRP levels and significantly lower Vitamin D concentrations compared with healthy controls. Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent among NAFLD patients, while elevated CRP levels were observed in the majority of cases, indicating a substantial inflammatory burden. Serum ferritin and Vitamin D levels were not significantly correlated with disease severity. In contrast, CRP demonstrated a strong positive correlation with NAFLD severity, suggesting that it may serve as a useful marker of disease progression and inflammatory activity. The combined assessment of serum ferritin, Vitamin D, and CRP may provide a simple, cost-effective approach for identifying patients with increased metabolic and inflammatory burden. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings and to determine the clinical utility of these biomarkers in monitoring disease progression and guiding therapeutic interventions in NAFLD.

Authors’ contribution: The present study was done by Dr. Mary Chandrika Anton under the guidance of Dr. B. Shanthi. Mr. Vasudevan Elumalai contributed with sample collection and Dr. K. Sumathi contributed in discussion.

References

1.
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73-84.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review. JAMA. 2015;313(22):2263-2273.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Tilg H, Moschen AR. Inflammatory mechanisms in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(8):497-509.
4.
Kowdley KV, Belt P, Wilson LA, Yeh MM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Chalasani N, et al. Serum ferritin is an independent predictor of histologic severity and advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2012;55(1):77-85.[crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Nelson JE, Wilson L, Brunt EM, Yeh MM, Kleiner DE, Unalp-Arida A, et al. Relationship between the pattern of hepatic iron deposition and histological severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(8):684-690.[crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Christakos S, Hewison M, Gardner DG, Wagner CL, Sergeev IN, Rutten E, et al. Vitamin D: Beyond bone. Chem Biol. 2013;20(7):886-893.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Targher G, Bertolini L, Scala L, Cigolini M, Zenari L, Falezza G, et al. Associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and liver histology in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(2):537-543.
8.
Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ. Role of C-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:754.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Barchetta I, Angelico F, Del Ben M, Baroni MG, Pozzilli P, Morini S, et al. Strong association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in an adult population with normal serum liver enzymes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2280-2285.[crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Valenti L, Fracanzani AL, Dongiovanni P, Bugianesi E, Marchesini G, Manzini P, et al. Iron depletion by phlebotomy improves insulin resistance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hyperferritinemia. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(42):5637-5641.
11.
Haukeland JW, Damås JK, Konopski Z, Løberg EM, Haaland T, Goverud I, et al. Systemic inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is characterized by elevated levels of CCL2. J Hepatol. 2006;44(6):1167-1174.[crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. NAFLD from pathogenesis to management: An update. Obes Rev. 2010;11(6):430-445.[crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Valenti L, Bugianesi E, Fracanzani AL, Galmozzi E, Fatta E, Lombardi R, et al. Increased serum ferritin levels are associated with insulin resistance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51(2):438-447.
14.
Bellentani S, Scaglioni F, Marino M, Bedogni G. Epidemiology of NAFLD. Dig Dis. 2010;28(1):155-161.[crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Yoneda M, Mawatari H, Fujita K, Endo H, Iida H, Nozaki Y, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is an independent clinical feature of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and is associated with insulin resistance. Hepatol Res. 2007;37(7):556-563.
16.
Targher G, Bertolini L, Poli F, Rodella S, Scala L, Tessari R, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and increased risk of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic patients. Circulation. 2005;112(4):589-595.[crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Yoneda M, Mawatari H, Fujita K, Iida H, Yonemitsu K, Kato S, et al. High- sensitivity C-reactive protein is an independent clinical feature of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and also of the severity of fibrosis in NASH. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42(7):573-582.[crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Jablonski KL, Jovanovich A, Holmen J, Targher G, McFann K, Kendrick J, et al. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is independently associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(8):792-798.[crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328-357.[crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Hernaez R, Lazo M, Bonekamp S, Kamel I, Brancati FL, Guallar E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011;54(3):1082-1090.[crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(16):1221- 1231.[crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Das K, Das K, Mukherjee PS, Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Mridha AR, et al. Nonobese population in a developing country has a high prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and significant liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51(5):1593-1602.[crossref] [PubMed]
23.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.[crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Zoli M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003;37(4):917-923.[crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266-281.[crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, Criqui M, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: Application to clinical and public health practice. Circulation. 2003;107(3):499-511.[crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Cheh C, et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(25):2631-2639.[crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Bugianesi E, Manzini P, D’Antico S, Vanni E, Longo F, Leone N, et al. Relative contribution of iron burden, HFE mutations, and insulin resistance to fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver. Hepatology. 2004;39(1):179-187.[crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Adams LA, Crawford DH, Stuart K, House MJ, St Pierre TG, Webb M, et al. The impact of hepatic iron concentration on insulin resistance and hepatic fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53(1):91-99.
30.
Valenti L, Fracanzani AL, Dongiovanni P, Bugianesi E, Marchesini G, Manzini P, et al. Increased iron stores in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease are associated with insulin resistance and hepatic damage. Hepatology. 2010;51(2):438-447.
31.
Lonardo A, Ballestri S, Marchesini G, Angulo P, Loria P. NAFLD: A precursor of metabolic syndrome. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47(3):181-190.[crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Stefan N, Häring HU, Cusi K. NAFLD: Causes, diagnosis, cardiometabolic consequences, and treatment strategies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(4):313-324.[crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Eliades M, Spyrou E. Vitamin D: A new player in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;82(3):310-319.[crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Sanyal AJ. Pathogenesis of NAFLD. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2(1):46-53.[crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Mantovani A, Byrne CD, Bonora E, Targher G. NAFLD and incident type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):372-382.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87939.24394

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Mar 17, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 08, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 25, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 04, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 06, 2026 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com