Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 214462

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : DC12 - DC17 Full Version

Molecular Epidemiology of Emerging Subvariants of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Lineage: A Cross-sectional Study from Himachal Pradesh, India


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/82142.24364
Priyanka Rao, Sunite A Ganju, Lata R Chandel

1. Junior Resident, Department of Microbiology, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India. 2. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sunite A Ganju,
214-B, Sector-3, New Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
E-mail: suniteaganju@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) shows continuous genetic variation, resulting in the emergence of multiple viral lineages worldwide. These mutations can influence viral transmissibility, pathogenic potential, and immune escape, resulting in changed disease pattern. Genomic surveillance allows systematic tracking of viral evolution and circulating variants; thus, monitoring is essential for informed public health planning and clinical preparedness.

Aim: To detect the emergence of variants of Omicron lineage in the hilly state of Himachal Pradesh, India.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Medical College, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India from January 2024 to June 2024. All the SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value ≤30 received across the state from the four Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratories (VRDLs) of the state were included. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction was performed using the Q-Line Molecular Viral RNA Extraction Kit, and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) was carried out on the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. Consensus sequences were generated using Medaka and Nanopolish for variant identification and phylogenetic analysis. All demographic and clinical data, like age, sex, clinical presentation, and vaccination status, were recorded and tabulated in Microsoft Excel 2021. The study focused on genomic sequences generated, and the data were presented as numbers and percentages.

Results: A total of 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were received. Among SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, adult females constituted the highest proportion, 17 (56.7%), with most patients aged 19-60 years, 17 (56.7%), and the majority of samples originating from Shimla, 11 (36.7%). The study identified JN.1 sublineages in 19 (63.3%) as the predominant cause of infection. Most cases, 20 (66.7%) reported to the outpatient department. Mild symptoms such as fever and cough were seen in 7 (35%) cases. Even though 23 (76.7%) of cases were vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine, 10 (33.3%) required admissions. However, no mortality was reported.

Conclusion: Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants revealed the predominance of the JN.1 sublineage of Omicron with generally mild symptoms. Continuous genetic evolution of SARS CoV-2 highlights the need for robust, ongoing genomic surveillance integrated with epidemiological data to enable early detection of emerging variants and strengthen control strategies.

Keywords

Epidemiology, Genomic surveillance, Respiratory tract infections, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

The SARS-CoV-2 was initially detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and has undergone continuous evolution due to genetic mutations or recombination occurring during genome replication (1). This has led to the emergence of variants distinct from the original virus, each with distinct characteristics related to transmissibility and resistance (2),(3).

The five major variants of concern, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron, each show increased transmissibility, infectivity, and immune evasion. Besides, the subvariants of Omicron like BA.2, BA.5, and XBB have gained attention for their rapid spread and resistance to neutralising antibodies and monoclonal therapies (4). In August 2023, a new COVID-19 Omicron variant called BA.2.86 appeared. It is a sublineage of the older BA.2 variant (5). At the same time, XBB variants were most commonly circulating globally (6). BA.2.86 had over 30 changes in its spike protein. It was first found in Israel on August 13, 2023 and recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in August 2023, as a Variant Under Monitoring. Later, it was upgraded to a Variant of Interest (VOI) as it started to spread, as confirmed by genomic surveillance data (5).

Further lineage BA.2.86 evolved to give rise to the JN.1 (BA.2.86.1.1) lineage, which was first detected in the United States in September 2023 and simultaneously identified in 12 other countries, with the highest proportions reported in Canada, France, Singapore, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The rapid and widespread transmission of JN.1 across multiple nations led WHO to recognise it as a VOI on December 20, 2023, with distinct characteristics compared with the parent lineage, BA.2.86 (7). According to WHO reports during January 2024, JN.1 was the most frequently reported VOI globally. It was detected in 71 countries, accounting for 65.5% of all sequences in the final week of December 2023 (8). By January 2024, the JN.1 variant had become the dominant strain in India, emphasising its significant global impact and transmission dynamics (9).

The symptoms of the JN.1 variant appeared to be very similar to those of previous variants, but generally less severe. The patients reported sore throat as their initial symptom, often followed by congestion of the nose. Symptoms such as dry cough and loss of smell or taste were observed less frequently than with earlier variants. However, in severe cases, symptoms like difficulty in breathing and chest discomfort were reported. Overall, severity was less compared to the early stages of the pandemic (10).

Although WHO declared the end of COVID-19 as a public health emergency on May 5, 2023, SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve with the emergence of new variants. This highlights the need for a robust ongoing vigilance through continuous monitoring. Surveillance of viral genomes is vital for the rapid detection of variants, guiding global public health strategies and targeted interventions essential for developing effective treatments and vaccines, ensuring a strong response to future threats (11).

The study aimed to detect the emerging subvariants of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 by WGS in COVID-19 positive samples received from various districts within Himachal Pradesh, India.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study, conducted at the Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Medical College, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India from January to June 2024, wherein all COVID-19 positive samples received from the four VRDLs of the state of Himachal Pradesh were subjected to WGS at the SARS-CoV-2 WGS laboratory recognised by the Indian SARS-CoV-2 Genomics Consortium. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee vide letter no. HFW(H)/SLBSGMC/IEC/2018-90, Protocol No. 20/2022.

This was a time-bound study, and all subjects available during the study period were included; hence, no formal statistical sample size calculation was performed.

Inclusion criteria: All SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive samples that met the predefined eligibility conditions were included for WGS. These comprised samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) value ≤30, collected in viral transport medium, and transported under appropriate cold chain conditions (12).

Exclusion criteria: Samples with Ct value ≥ 30, an insufficient sample volume, or compromised sample quality that could affect sequencing reliability were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

All the demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, district of sample collection, clinical symptoms, disease severity, and vaccination status, were compiled, collated and analysed. Clinical severity was categorised based on presenting symptoms and need for hospital care. Mild illness was defined as symptomatic disease without hypoxia (SpO2 ≥94% on room air) or radiological pneumonia, while minimal hospitalisation referred to brief admission for observation or supportive care without oxygen or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) requirement (13). All samples were processed in a Biosafety Level (BSL)-2 laboratory within a Class II Microbiological Safety Cabinet while following BSL-3 precautions for handling potentially infectious material. The RNA extraction was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Q-Line Molecular Viral RNA Extraction Kit from Q-Line Biotech, by a silica membrane-based spin column method (14) All samples with Ct values ≤30 were subjected to next-generation WGS using Oxford Nanopore MinION technology. The MinION is a compact and portable sequencing device managed by MinKNOW software version 24.11.8, which handles essential operations during sequencing runs. These tasks range from sample tracking and data acquisition to real-time analysis, base calling, and data streaming using MinKNOW software. The library was prepared and sequenced using the Oxford Nanopore MinION Mk1B device for 18 hours. All eligible samples received during the study period were included for testing, irrespective of disease severity, and no additional randomisation was performed. In the current study, among 30 SARS-CoV-2 samples analysed, the genome coverage greater than 70% was achieved in 20 samples.

The bioinformatics data analysis was done by inter ARTIC software version 0.4.4 incorporating the ARTIC bioinformatics pipeline (version 1.2.1) which uses two inbuilt tools, namely ‘Medaka’ and ‘Nanopolish.’ These were employed to create consensus sequences (single nucleotide variation, insertion, deletions, coverage) from nanopore sequencing data and visualisation was done by using UShER (Ultrafast Sample placement on Existing tRee) and Nextclade. UShER enables the comparison of the genetic similarity of the test samples to the sequences available in the public repository, including GISAID (Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data) and shows the relationship between genetically similar sequences.

Comparative analysis with the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome (NC_045512.2) revealed the presence of six distinct Omicron sublineages among the sequenced samples. The six Omicron sublineages were classified based on Pango lineage assignment from WGS data using lineage-defining mutation profiles. The pango lineage of the sequenced SARS-CoV-2 samples was determined using UShER, which enables rapid and precise phylogenetic placement. Utilising a maximum parsimony-based approach, UShER ensures robust and reliable lineage classification grounded in the global diversity of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. The Nextclade phylogenetic placement shows a clearer picture of the viral evolution, placing the samples onto the same background tree. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Nextclade online tool (version 3.13.2) and evaluated (15).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

All demographic and clinical data were recorded and tabulated in Microsoft® Excel version 2021 and presented as numbers and percentages.

Results

A total of 30 samples were received in the laboratory, and in all, the Ct value was ≤30. Among all SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, a higher proportion of infection was noted, 17 (56.7%) in adult females. The majority of cases, 17 (56.7%) were in the age range of 19-60 years. A total of 11 (36.7%) samples were received from district Shimla, followed by 9 (30%) from district Hamirpur and district Nahan (Table/Fig 1).

Out of all the 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, 10 (33.3%) were asymptomatic, while 20 (66.7%) were symptomatic. However, 10 patients (33.3%) required inpatient admission, compared to 20 (66.7%) who attended the outpatient department. Vaccination for COVID-19 was recorded in 23 (76.7%) of cases (Table/Fig 2).

Month-wise distribution of different lineages of the Omicron variant showed that the maximum number of isolates was detected in month of February 2024, followed by March 2024. No sample was received in the month of May, and also after July to December 2024 (Table/Fig 3).

The most common sublineage detected was JN.1.1 belonging to the JN.1 lineage. The further phylogenetic analysis revealed the presence of seven distinct Nextstrain clades among the 30 sequenced samples: 21L, 22F, 23B, 23I, 24A, 24B, and 24C. The majority of the viruses 20 (66.7%) were clustered in clade 23I indicating a dominant clade. Clade 23I, 24B and 24C, comprised of the KP strains. Clades 21L and 24C each contained three clustered viruses. Each clade 22F, 23B, 24A, and 24B contained a single virus showing lower representation of these clades (Table/Fig 4).

JN.1, a descendant of the BA.2.86 lineage, exhibits specific mutations in the spike protein Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD), enhancing ACE2 binding and immune evasion. In the current study, JN.1 circulation declined over time, with KP.1, KP.3, and other JN.1-derived variants becoming more prevalent. Phylogenetic analysis showed that JN.1 forms a distinct, long branch, reflecting its evolutionary divergence from other variants. Rooted trees represent genetic changes over time, while unrooted trees depict sequence relatedness without implying ancestry. The phylogenetic tree in rooted and unrooted layouts is shown in (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6).

JN.1 shows 24 spike protein mutations compared to the original Wuhan-Hu-1 strain. Similar mutations like T19I, D614G, N764K, D796Y, Q954H, and N969K were found when compared to Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, but these were not detected in BA.2 and XBB sequences. In contrast, the Q146H mutation appeared when compared to the XBB variant, but was not found in the comparison with Wuhan-Hu-1. The list of mutations detected is illustrated in (Table/Fig 7).

Comparison of JN.1 with Wuhan-Hu-1, BA.2, XBB, and BA.2.86 revealed universal, unique, and random spike protein mutations. Unique mutations included L50S, V83A, F127V, G123E, E554K, S939F, and V1104L. Universal mutations like T547K, A570V, and D614G were also present. Most mutations were random, with A27S found in the N-Terminal Domain (NTD) being the most common. The mutations detected are shown in (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

SARS-CoV-2 being an RNA virus, continuously mutates during transmission and leads to emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants. This not only can reduce the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection techniques but also poses challenges for epidemic control (16),(17).

Nanopore sequencing effectively monitors SARS-CoV-2 mutations and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in different regions and is extensively used for diagnostic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2, and genome sequencing (18),(19).

In this study, the majority of cases were in the age group 19-60 years, which could be due to more outdoor activities and more contact with persons in comparison to extremes of age. Similar findings were observed in a study by Kushwaha S et al., (20). In a study conducted in Tamil Nadu, India, the proportion of male and female patients was equal, with 50% males and 50% females among JN.1 positive cases (4). In contrast, a study from Maharashtra reported a higher percentage of male patients, with 55.45% males and 44.55% females (7). These differences might also be due to biological variations like immunological and genetic differences. In the current study, the variants identified during this period caused only mild illness requiring minimal hospitalisation for observation or supportive care without oxygen or any intensive care requirement. Similar to the study done by Levy ME et al., where the hospitalisation due to JN.1 variants was much less than other variants (21). In this study, symptomatic patients had only mild symptoms like cough, fever or both, similar to findings shown by Selvavinayagam ST et al., mild symptoms and fewer complications due to new variants despite their higher rate of transmission could be associated with a high rate of vaccination status in the state (4). The study depicted that most of the SARS-CoV-2 positivity was seen in the rural population, and these findings are quite comparable to a study done by Sahoo PK et al., which showed that returning migrants (mainly day labourers) brought the disease back to their home, which triggered significant spread of the virus to semiurban and rural areas. This highlighted serious concern in rural India, where access to sophisticated healthcare and mitigation strategies were lacking (22).

The highest number of positive samples was reported from Shimla district. This could be attributed to Shimla being the state capital and a focal point for interstate and inter-district travel, resulting in increased movement of people, which likely contributed to a higher risk of virus transmission and, consequently, a greater number of positive cases followed by Hamirpur District. Nahan accounted for 30% of the samples which is a border area of the state.

The significant increase in cases of the JN.1 variant after vaccinations suggested breakthrough infections with a heightened ability to evade immunity (20). While the previous XBB variant exhibited 82% immune evasiveness in vaccinated individuals, the JN.1 variant had acquired multiple mutations which resulted in structural changes to the spike protein, leading to an immune evasion rate of 95% (23). Also, the reason for acquiring infection even after getting vaccinated could be attributed to COVID-19 inappropriate behaviour like not wearing masks and not taking care of transmission-based precautions (24). Six major Omicron lineage/sublineage groups are reported using Pango classification, while seven clades are described using Nextstrain. The Pango lineage and Nextstrain systems represent two different classification frameworks. The Pango lineage system offers a fine-scale, hierarchical classification of SARS-CoV-2 sublineages, while the Nextstrain system categorises sequences into broader phylogenetic clades reflecting major evolutionary patterns and global spread.

The major variants detected in present study in 2024 were JN.1.1, JN.1.11, JN.1, JN.1.30 in 63.3% samples. A study done by Lu Y et al., also revealed that the global prevalence of JN.1 exceeded 60% in early 2024 (25). The spike protein is responsible for binding to the human ACE2 receptor and is the main target of neutralising antibodies, so mutations here can affect transmissibility, immune evasion, and vaccine effectiveness. Mutations detected in current study such as A27S, L50S, V83A, F127V, S157F, and G123E are situated in the NTD, a region known to be involved in immune recognition. Changes here may alter the antigenic properties of the virus, potentially aiding in immune evasion. The A27S in the S protein may present an evolutionary marker and should be tracked in future studies (26). L216F lies near the RBD, which is directly involved in binding to the ACE2 receptor on host cells. Alterations in this area could influence binding affinity and, consequently, transmissibility. Mutations like T547K, K1086R, and V1104L are located in the S2 subunit, which facilitates membrane fusion during viral entry. Changes here might affect the fusion process, potentially impacting viral infectivity (27),(28). In the present study, the V1104L mutation was detected, which is shown to stabilise the spike conformation and decrease infectivity (29).

Of the 30 samples, 20 had high genome coverage (>70%). Among the remaining 10 samples, nine had coverage ≥50% (including 6 with >60% coverage), while only one sample had <50% coverage. While higher genome coverage provides greater confidence for detailed mutational analysis, however, partial genome coverage still permits reliable lineage assignment depending on the genomic regions sequenced, and lineage determination was consistent across samples. All samples were included to preserve epidemiological representation.

In this study, KP sublineages became the predominant circulating strains following the decline of JN.1 sublineages. According to the WHO the current circulating VUMs are KP.3, KP.3.1.1, LB.1, XEC, LP.8.1 with genetic features of JN.1+S: F456L, S: Q493E, S: V1104L, KP.3+S: S31-, JN.1+ S: S31-, S: Q183H, S: R346T, S: F456L, JN.1+S: T22N, S: F59S, S: F456L, S: Q493E, S: V1104L and JN.1+S: S31-, S: F186L, S: R190S, S: R346T, S: V445R, S: F456L, S: Q493E, S: K1086R, S: V1104L, respectively (30).

In the study, the first confirmed case of the JN.1 variant was recorded in a sample collected in January 2024. The JN.1 lineage was first identified in the United States in September 2023, followed by its initial detection in India in December 2023 in the state of Kerala (31). It was observed that the emergence and detection of new COVID-19 variants in our state typically lagged by one to two months when compared to states like Maharashtra and Kerala. This delay could be attributed to several factors. Maharashtra and Kerala have significantly higher population densities, which can accelerate the spread of infectious diseases due to closer human contact. Additionally, both states experience much higher levels of domestic and international mobility, particularly through major international airports in cities like Mumbai. These airports serve as key entry points for travelers from around the world, increasing the likelihood of earlier introduction and detection of new variants. In contrast, our state, being a hill state with a relatively lower population density and limited international travel, may naturally experience a slower spread and later detection of emerging variants. Consistent with the findings of Lu Y et al., no deaths were reported in the present study, suggesting that the newly emerged Omicron variant may not be associated with an increase in mortality. Nonetheless, ongoing genomic surveillance and clinical monitoring are imperative to assess its evolving pathogenic potential (25).

The study highlights the predominance of the JN.1 sublineage in Himachal Pradesh, emphasising the importance of regional genomic surveillance to guide public health measures and vaccine strategies. Expanded genomic monitoring with larger sample sizes and integration of clinical and vaccination data will help assess variant impact, disease severity, and vaccine effectiveness, enabling timely public health responses.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the study were the smaller number of samples, as only 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were received from different VRDLs during the study period. As this was a time-bound study and included all available subjects, no prior statistical sample size calculation was done, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. Besides, patient follow-up was not possible, which restricted the assessment of clinical outcomes or disease progression in relation to the specific variants detected. Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable insights into genomic surveillance data from the region.

Conclusion

This study uncovers the rapidly evolving SARS-CoV-2 landscape, with sublineages like JN.1 carrying distinct spike protein mutations. Such changes may alter viral infectivity and immune interactions, highlighting their real-world impact. Though the disease was less severe and led to a lower hospitalisation rate, the WGS approach by NGS using nanopore represents the gold standard, which helps in tracking the spread of the virus, local transmission trends and variant-specific evolutionary patterns to identify emerging strains. Early detection of these mutations through surveillance provides actionable insights for effective public health intervention, like targeted infection prevention, vaccine development and research.

References

1.
Yadav PD, Nyayanit DA, Majumdar T, Patil S, Kaur H, Gupta N, et al. An epidemiological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences from different regions of India. Viruses. 2021;13:925. Doi: 10.3390/v13050925. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Cheng Y, Ji C, Zhou HY, Zheng H, Wu A. Web resources for SARS-CoV-2 genomic database, annotation, analysis and variant tracking. Viruses. 2023;15:1158. Doi: 10.3390/v15051158. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Khan MZI, Nazli A, Al-Furas H, Asad MI, Ajmal I, Khan D, et al. An overview of viral mutagenesis and the impact on pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1034444. Doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1034444. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Selvavinayagam ST, Sankar S, Yong YK, Murugesan A, Suvaithenamudhan S, Hemashree K, et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant JN.1 in Tamil Nadu, India- Clinical characteristics and novel mutations. Sci Rep. 2024;14:17476. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68678-z. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Lambrou AS, South E, Ballou ES, Paden CR, Fuller JA, Bart SM, et al. Early detection and surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86 - worldwide, July–October 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:1162-67. Doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7243a2. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Tamura T, Ito J, Uriu K, Zahradnik J, Kida I, Anraku Y, et al. Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 XBB variant derived from recombination of two Omicron subvariants. Nat Commun. 2023;14:2800. Doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38435-3. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Karyakarte RP, Das R, Rajmane MV, Dudhate S, Agarasen J, Pillai P, et al. Appearance and prevalence of JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 variant in India and its clinical profile in the state of Maharashtra. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e56718. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.56718. PMID: 38646375; PMCID: PMC11032724. [crossref]
8.
World Health Organization. Epidemiological update on SARS-CoV-2 variants: January 2024 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/update-on-the-epidemiology-of-sars-cov-2-variants. [cited 2026 May 14].
9.
Khan SA, Bhuiyan MA, Dewan SMR. JN.1: The present public health concern pertains to the emergence of a novel variant of COVID-19. Environ Health Insights. 2024;18:11786302241228958. Doi: 10.1177/11786302241228958. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Hemo MK, Islam MA. JN.1 as a new variant of COVID-19 – editorial. Ann Med Surg. 2024;86:1833-35. Doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001876. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Gong YN, Kuo NY, Yeh TS, Shih SR, Chen GW. Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Taiwan: A perspective on evolutionary data interpretation and sequencing issues. Biomed J. 2024;47(1):100820. Doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2024.100820. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Goswami C, Sheldon M, Bixby C, Keddache M, Bogdanowicz A, Wang Y, et al. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants using viral sequencing for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention genomic surveillance program. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22:404. Doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07374-7.
13.
National Institutes of Health. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. 2023. Available from: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/.
14.
Q-Line Biotech Pvt., Ltd. Q-Line Molecular Viral RNA Extraction Kit: Instruction Manual. India: Q-Line Biotech Pvt. Ltd.; 2023.
15.
Aksamentov I, Roemer C, Hodcroft E, Neher R. Nextclade: Clade assignment, mutation calling and quality control for viral genomes. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6:3773. Doi: 10.21105/joss.03773.
16.
Zheng P, Zhou C, Ding Y, Liu B, Lu L, Zhu F, et al. Nanopore sequencing technology and its applications. MedComm. 2023;4:e316. Doi: 10.1002/mco2.316. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Tyson JR, James P, Stoddart D, Sparks N, Wickenhagen A, Hall G, et al. Improvements to the ARTIC multiplex PCR method for SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing using nanopore [Preprint]. bioRxiv. 2020;2020.09.04.283077. Doi: 10.1101/2020.09.04.283077. [crossref]
18.
Jaworski E, Langsjoen RM, Mitchell B, Judy B, Newman P, Plante JA, et al. Tiled-ClickSeq for targeted sequencing of complete coronavirus genomes with simultaneous capture of RNA recombination and minority variants. eLife. 2021;10:e68479. Doi: 10.7554/eLife.68479. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Wang M, Fu A, Hu B, Tong Y, Liu R, Liu Z, et al. Nanopore targeted sequencing for the accurate and comprehensive detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses. Small. 2020;16:2002169. Doi: 10.1002/smll.202002169. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Kushwaha S, Khanna P, Rajagopal V, Kiran T. Biological attributes of age and gender variations in Indian COVID-19 cases: A retrospective data analysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;11:100788. Doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100788. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Levy ME, Chilunda V, Davis RE, Heaton PR, Pawloski PA, Goldman JD, et al. Reduced likelihood of hospitalization with the JN.1 or HV.1 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants compared with the EG.5 variant. J Infect Dis. 2024;230:1197-201. Doi: 10.1101/2024.05.08.24307003. [crossref]
22.
Sahoo PK, Biswal S, Kumar H, Powell M. Urban to rural COVID-19 progression in India: The role of massive migration and the challenge to India’s traditional labour force policies. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022;37:528-35. Doi: 10.1002/hpm.3327. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Selvavinayagam ST, Karishma SJ, Hemashree K, Yong YK, Suvaithenamudhan S, Rajeshkumar M, et al. Clinical characteristics and novel mutations of omicron subvariant XBB in Tamil Nadu, India- A cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023;19:100272. Doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100272. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Hamimes A, Lounis M, Aouissi HA, Roufayel R, Lakehal A, Bouzekri H, et al. The role of vaccination and face mask wearing on COVID-19 infection and hospitalization: A cross- sectional study of the MENA region. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:1257. Doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091257. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Lu Y, Ao D, He X, Wei X. The rising SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant: Evolution, infectivity, immune escape, and response strategies. MedComm. 2024;5:e675. Doi: 10.1002/mco2.675. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Wang HB, Huang HN, Chen XB, Zhou HT, Yuan C, Ou J. Molecular epidemiology and temporal dynamic of SARS-CoV-2 imported from Hong Kong to mainland China. The Microbe. 2024;3:100054. Doi: 10.1016/j.microb.2024.100054. [crossref]
27.
Roney M, Mohd Aluwi MFF. Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 from BA.2.86 to JN.1 variations and detection in Bangladesh. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2024;48:78. Doi: 10.1186/s42269-024-01233-y. [crossref]
28.
Wang X, Lu L, Jiang S. SARS-CoV-2 evolution from the BA.2.86 to JN.1 variants: Unexpected consequences. Trends Immunol. 2024;45:81-84. Doi: 10.1016/j. it.2024.01.003. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Li P, Faraone JN, Hsu CC, Chamblee M, Zheng YM, Carlin C, et al. Characteristics of JN.1-derived SARS-CoV-2 subvariants SLip, FLiRT, and KP.2 in neutralization escape, infectivity and membrane fusion. Cell Rep. 2024;43:114520. Doi: 10.1101/2024.05.20.595020. [crossref]
30.
World Health Organization. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited 2026 May 14]. Available from: https:// www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants.
31.
Debnath R, Singh A, Seni K, Sharma A, Chawla V, Chawla PA. Mapping COVID- 19 in India: Southern states at the forefront of new JN.1 variant. Asian Pac J Trop Med.10.4103/apjtm.apjtm_2_24[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/82142.24364

Date of Submission: Jul 24, 2025
Date of Peer Review: Oct 08, 2025
Date of Acceptance: May 20, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 22, 2025
• Manual Googling: May 16, 2026
• iThenticate Software: May 18, 2026 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com