Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 9860

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : OD31 - OD33 Full Version

Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis Presenting as Acute Hemiplegia and Altered Sensorium: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/88711.24354
Deepak Raj, R Umashankar, Razook Fareedh, MV Aishwarya Lakshmi, Saketh Ramineni

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of General Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Deepak Raj,
No. 40/68, TVK 2nd Link Road, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-118, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: deepakraj.maa@gmail.com

Abstract

Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis (HSVE) is the most common cause of sporadic fatal viral encephalitis worldwide and carries substantial morbidity and mortality when antiviral therapy is delayed. The disease typically involves the temporal lobes and presents with fever, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurological deficits. However, early clinical and radiological features may closely resemble acute ischemic stroke, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. We report a 46-year-old male patient who presented with an acute onset of fever, global aphasia, right-sided hemiplegia, and altered sensorium. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) demonstrated unilateral cortical T2/FLAIR hyperintensity with diffusion restriction predominantly involving the left temporal and fronto-parietal regions, without conformity to a specific vascular territory. Electroencephalography (EEG) revealed Periodic Lateralised Epileptiform Discharges (PLED) over the left hemisphere. Normal opening pressure, slight lymphocytic pleocytosis (68 cells/mm3), normal protein and glucose, and negative Gram stain, AFB smear, and fungal investigations were all observed in the CSF study. A normal first CSF does not rule out the diagnosis because early HSVE might appear with little or normal CSF abnormalities. Empirical intravenous acyclovir was initiated promptly. The patient demonstrated neurological stabilisation following antiviral therapy. This case highlights the importance of considering HSVE in patients presenting with acute febrile focal neurological deficits mimicking stroke. Early recognition and timely antiviral therapy significantly reduce mortality and improve neurological outcomes.

Keywords

Acyclovir, Aphasia, Hemiparesis

Case Report

A 46-year-old male presented in emergency room with a two-day history of high-grade fever (102.2 F) followed by an acute onset of confusion and reduced responsiveness. He was later found to have global aphasia and inability to move the right upper and lower limbs. There was no prior history of cerebrovascular disease, seizures, head trauma, diabetes mellitus, or chronic neurological illness, and no recent systemic infection or travel history was reported.

On examination, the patient was febrile (102°F) with increased pressure (200/100 mmHg). His Glasgow Coma Scale score was E4V1M6. Neurological examination revealed global aphasia and right-sided flaccid hemiplegia, with brisk deep tendon reflexes on the right and an extensor plantar response. Brainstem reflexes were preserved, and no meningeal signs were elicited. On investigations MRI of the brain demonstrated T2/FLAIR hyperintensity with diffusion restriction involving the left temporal, insular, fronto-parietal, and occipital cortices, with additional involvement of the left thalamus and corresponding low Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values (Table/Fig 1). The lesions did not confirm to a specific arterial vascular territory, and no large vessel occlusion was identified on angiographic sequences, favouring a diagnosis of viral encephalitis rather than ischemic infarction. EEG revealed left hemispheric PLEDs predominantly over the temporal region, along with background slowing. These findings are indicative of focal cortical irritability and are classically associated with HSVE involving the temporal lobe (Table/Fig 2). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed a normal opening pressure. The total leukocyte count was 68 cells/mm3 with a lymphocytic predominance (85% lymphocytes, 15% neutrophils). The protein level was 24.2 mg/dL, and the glucose was 65 mg/dL, with a corresponding blood glucose of 108 mg/dL. Red blood cells were present at 120 cells/mm3 and minimal cellularity, with negative Gram stain, AFB smear, and fungal studies. It is recognised that early HSVE may demonstrate minimal pleocytosis, and normal initial CSF findings do not exclude the diagnosis. Although HSV polymerase chain reaction is considered the diagnostic gold standard, it could not be performed in this case due to logistic constraint. However, the diagnosis of probable HSVE was made based on the characteristic clinical presentation, typical MRI findings involving the temporal and insular cortex, and supportive EEG abnormalities. Empirical intravenous acyclovir (10 mg/kg every 8 hours) was initiated promptly, along with supportive management including blood pressure control, seizure prophylaxis, and measures to reduce intracranial pressure, while broad-spectrum antibiotics were discontinued following negative microbiological results. By three to five days of antiviral therapy, the patient demonstrated improvement in alertness with stabilisation of neurological deficits, and no further seizures were observed. Although residual right-sided weakness remained, the patient showed some neurological recovery at discharge, with sensorium improving and focal impairments stabilising. Logistical limitations prevented the performance of follow-up neuroimaging.

Discussion

Acute hemiplegia with altered sensorium closely mimicking an acute ischemic stroke represents an uncommon but clinically important presentation of HSVE. In the present case, the patient initially presented with high-grade fever, rapidly progressive encephalopathy, global aphasia, and right-sided hemiplegia, strongly suggesting an acute cerebrovascular event. However, MRI brain demonstrated cortical T2/FLAIR hyperintensities with diffusion restriction involving the left temporal, insular, fronto-parietal, occipital cortices, and thalamus without confinement to a defined vascular territory, favouring an infectious encephalitic process rather than arterial infarction. Similar stroke-like presentations of HSVE have increasingly been reported in recent literature. AlRashed F et al., described a patient presenting with acute focal neurological deficits suggestive of stroke in whom subsequent neuroimaging and clinical progression established HSVE as the underlying diagnosis (1). Their report emphasised that HSV CNS infection may initially mimic acute ischemic stroke because of abrupt onset hemiparesis and aphasia, particularly when early imaging demonstrates cortical diffusion restriction. Grzonka P et al., in a recent systematic review of HSV CNS infections, further highlighted that focal neurological deficits including hemiplegia, aphasia, and cortical signs may dominate the early clinical presentation and frequently lead to an initial misdiagnosis of stroke (2). Compared with previously reported cases, the patient demonstrated more extensive multifocal cortical involvement with thalamic extension and preceding fever, which increased the suspicion for encephalitis early during evaluation.

Neuroimaging played a crucial role in differentiating HSVE from acute ischemic stroke in the present case. Diffusion restriction extending beyond arterial vascular territories, particularly involving the temporal and insular cortices, strongly supported viral encephalitis. Roçi E et al., reported a 49-year-old man presenting with abrupt aphasia and hemiplegia who was initially treated as acute ischemic stroke until MRI revealed unilateral temporal-insular diffusion restriction compatible with HSVE (3). Similarly, a recent case report described HSV meningoencephalitis presenting with acute Broca’s aphasia and stroke-like deficits, where diffusion restriction involving the temporal and insular cortex ultimately favoured encephalitis over infarction (4). These reports closely resemble the imaging pattern observed in our patient, although the current case demonstrated more extensive cortical involvement including occipital and thalamic regions. Such multifocal cortical diffusion abnormalities extending beyond vascular territories are atypical for acute infarction and should raise suspicion for encephalitis, particularly in the presence of fever and encephalopathy.

The EEG provided additional diagnostic support in the current case. EEG demonstrated PLEDs predominantly over the left temporal region, correlating closely with MRI abnormalities and suggesting focal cortical irritability involving the dominant temporal lobe. Sutter R et al., demonstrated that EEG plays an important role in both the diagnosis and prognostication of acute encephalitis, with temporal periodic discharges and focal slowing being strongly associated with herpes simplex encephalitis (5). Similar EEG abnormalities have also been described in stroke-mimic presentations of HSVE, where early EEG findings supported prompt initiation of antiviral therapy before virological confirmation (1),(3),(4). In contrast to previously reported cases where EEG abnormalities evolved later during hospitalisation, the early identification of temporal PLEDs in our patient significantly strengthened the clinicoradiological diagnosis and facilitated timely initiation of acyclovir therapy.

Cerebrospinal fluid findings in HSVE may be subtle or even misleading during the early phase of illness and therefore should not exclude the diagnosis when clinical suspicion remains high. In the present case, CSF analysis revealed mild lymphocytic pleocytosis, normal glucose, protein, and red blood cells suggestive of early haemorrhagic temporal lobe involvement. Ahmed WA et al., reported a case of PCR-confirmed herpes simplex encephalitis with initially normal brain MRI and normocellular cerebrospinal fluid, highlighting that early investigations in HSVE may occasionally appear deceptively benign despite active CNS infection (6). Matthews E et al., further emphasised that early HSVE may demonstrate minimal inflammatory CSF abnormalities despite significant neurological dysfunction and characteristic neuroimaging findings (7). Compared with these reports, our patient demonstrated moderate inflammatory CSF abnormalities together with characteristic MRI and EEG findings, which facilitated early clinicoradiological diagnosis despite the unavailability of HSV PCR testing. These findings reinforce that HSVE often remains a predominantly clinicoradiological diagnosis in resource-limited settings and requires a high index of suspicion. Early initiation of intravenous acyclovir remains the cornerstone of HSVE management and is strongly associated with improved neurological outcomes. In the present case, empirical acyclovir therapy was initiated immediately after MRI and EEG findings suggested viral encephalitis, resulting in stabilisation of focal deficits and gradual improvement in sensorium within a few days. Similar favourable responses following early antiviral treatment have been described in recent stroke-mimic HSVE cases, where prompt recognition prevented inappropriate thrombolysis and improved neurological recovery (1),(3),(4). Aboelezz A and Mahmoud SH demonstrated that delayed acyclovir initiation remains one of the strongest predictors of mortality and poor neurological outcome in HSVE (8). Similarly, Duerlund LS et al., in a recent prospective cohort study, reaffirmed that early antiviral therapy significantly improves survival and functional recovery in HSV-1 encephalitis (9). Cleaver J et al., additionally highlighted that delayed recognition and treatment of HSVE may predispose survivors to significant neuroinflammatory and post-infectious autoimmune neurological complications (10). The present case therefore reinforces that HSVE should always be considered in febrile patients presenting with acute hemiplegia, aphasia, encephalopathy, and cortical diffusion restriction extending beyond vascular territories. Early MRI, EEG evaluation, and prompt empirical acyclovir therapy may be both diagnostic and life-saving.

Conclusion

The HSVE can closely mimic acute ischemic stroke during the early stages because of abrupt focal neurological deficits and marked diffusion restriction on MRI. Recognition of associated clinical features such as fever, encephalopathy, multifocal cortical involvement beyond vascular territories, and supportive EEG findings is essential to avoid diagnostic delay. Early empirical acyclovir therapy should be initiated whenever HSVE is suspected, even before virological confirmation is available. Prompt clinicoradiological diagnosis and treatment significantly reduce mortality and improve neurological outcomes.

References

1.
AlRashed F, AlGhaithi R, AlGhoshemi M. Herpes simplex virus infection of the central nervous system presenting as a stroke: Case report and review of the literature. IDCases. 2025;2025:41:e02328.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Grzonka P, Mosimann T, Berger S, Amacher SA, Baumann SM, Gebhard CE, et al. Unveiling the clinical spectrum of herpes simplex virus CNS infections in adults: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 2025;14(1):55.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Roçi E, Dodaj S, Vyshka G. Herpes simplex virus encephalitis mimicking acute ischemic stroke. Surg Neurol Int. 2023;14:60.[crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Arora G, Phung D, Kaur P. Herpes simplex virus meningoencephalitis masquerading as acute stroke with broca’s aphasia: A case report. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e40618. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.40618.[crossref]
5.
Sutter R, Kaplan PW, Cervenka MC, Thakur KT, Asemota AO, Venkatesan A, et al. Electroencephalography for diagnosis and prognosis of acute encephalitis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(8):1524-31.[crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Ahmed WA, Alghamdi AA, Almuhanna RA, Alazwari AA, Muddassir R, Elshony HS. Herpes simplex encephalitis with normal brain magnetic resonance imaging and normocellular initial cerebrospinal fluid. Int J Neurosci. 2024;134(12):1647- 51.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Matthews E, Beckham JD, Piquet AL, Tyler KL, Chauhan L, Pastula DM. Herpesvirus-associated encephalitis: An update. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2022;9(3):92-100.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Aboelezz A, Mahmoud SH. Acyclovir dosing in herpes encephalitis: A scoping review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024;64(3):102040.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Duerlund LS, Larsen L, Storgaard M, Mens H, Wiese L, Jepsen MP, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 encephalitis: A prospective population-based cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2026:82(6):e1384-e1392.[crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Cleaver J, Jeffery K, Klenerman P, Lim M, Handunnetthi L, Irani SR, et al. The immunobiology of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and post-viral autoimmunity. Brain. 2024;147(4):1130-48.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/88711.24354

Date of Submission: Mar 03, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Apr 16, 2026
Date of Acceptance: May 26, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 28, 2026
• Manual Googling: May 21, 2026
• iThenticate Software: May 23, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com