Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 14351

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : PD16 - PD18 Full Version

Malignant Proliferating Trichilemmal Tumour of the Deltoid Region in an Adolescent: A Rare Presentation at an Unusual Site and Young Age


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/88139.24387
Aditya Chadalawada, A Naveen Kumar

1. Senior Resident, Department of Gastrosurgery, Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Consultant, Department of General Surgery, Srikara Hospitals, Peerzadiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Aditya Chadalawada,
Bhel Mig 855, Rc Puram, Hyderabad-502032, Telangana, India.
E-mail: adi9025338@gmail.com

Abstract

Proliferating Trichilemmal Tumour (PTT) is a rare benign adnexal neoplasm arising from the outer root sheath of the hair follicle. Malignant transformation to Malignant PTT (MPTT) is exceptionally uncommon and is frequently mistaken for squamous cell carcinoma, as the two share overlapping clinical and microscopic features. MPTT classically affects the scalp of women in the sixth-to-seventh decade of life; presentation in adolescence and at an extra-scalp site is rare. The authors report a 16-year-old girl with a painless swelling over the left deltoid region present for one year, with rapid enlargement over the preceding five months. There was no history of trauma or intramuscular injection. An outside incisional biopsy reported MPTT and she was referred for definitive management. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed a 3.1×2.5 cm subcutaneous mass superficial to the deltoid without muscular invasion and a few small left-axillary nodes. After tumour board discussion she underwent wide local excision with 1 cm margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy localised with methylene blue dye; the sentinel node was negative on frozen section and definitive histopathology and all resected margins were free of tumour. Histopathology confirmed MPTT with abrupt keratinisation, nuclear atypia, infiltrative margins and eight mitoses per 10 high-power fields, without lymphovascular invasion. She recovered well, did not require adjuvant radiotherapy and showed no recurrence at follow-up. The present case highlights that MPTT can occur in adolescents and at unusual sites. It must be distinguished from squamous cell carcinoma and complete surgical excision with margin assessment is the cornerstone of management.

Keywords

Adnexal and skin appendage neoplasms, Hair follicle, Outer root sheath, Surgical margins of excision

Case Report

A 16-year-old girl presented with a painless swelling over the left deltoid region that had been present for one year and had gradually increased in size over the preceding five months. She was otherwise healthy with no significant past medical history. There was no history of trauma, intramuscular injection, or any local instrumentation at the site.

An incisional biopsy had been performed at an outside hospital on 14 March 2017 (reported 16 March 2017), which revealed a MPTT; definitive treatment was not undertaken there and she was referred to this tertiary surgical-oncology unit for staging and definitive management.

On arrival, the patient was haemodynamically stable. On examination there was a non tender, firm, nodular swelling measuring 3×3 cm over the left deltoid region (Table/Fig 1). No axillary lymph nodes were palpable. Magnetic resonance imaging of the left shoulder (Table/Fig 2) showed a well-defined soft-tissue mass measuring 3.1×2.5 cm in the left arm, superficial to the deltoid and confined to the subcutaneous plane without muscular invasion. The lesion showed intense contrast enhancement with cystic areas and a few enlarged left-axillary lymph nodes were noted, the largest measuring 1.3×1.1 cm. There was no demonstrable pathology in the left humerus or brachial vessels and the visualised lung fields were clear.

The case was discussed at the tumour board and surgery was planned. She underwent wide local excision of the tumour with 1 cm margins all around and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The sentinel node was localised intraoperatively using methylene blue dye injected over the lesion; through a separate axillary incision the blue-stained sentinel node was identified and dissected. Intraoperatively the specimen margins were sent for frozen-section analysis and confirmed to be adequate. Frozen-section analysis of the sentinel lymph node was negative for malignancy, so axillary lymph node dissection was not performed. Operative findings confirmed no intramuscular extension.

On gross examination the specimen was a lobulated subcutaneous mass measuring 3.5×3×2 cm (Table/Fig 3). On histopathological examination, stratified squamous epithelium overlay a malignant neoplasm composed of nests and strands of atypical squamoid cells showing mild-to-moderate atypia with pleomorphism and hyperchromasia (Table/Fig 4). Central keratin material with abrupt keratinisation was present and tumour cells were seen invading the surrounding stroma. Mitotic figures numbered eight per 10 high-power fields, no lymphovascular emboli were identified and all resected margins were free of tumour invasion (closest margins: superior 1.0 cm, inferior 1.5 cm, posterior 1.0 cm, anterior 0.5 cm, deep 0.8 cm and 0.2 cm from skin). These features were diagnostic of a MPTT.

As MPTT lacks a dedicated Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system, the lesion was graded histologically using the Ye J et al., classification as Group-3 (frankly malignant); clinically it represented a localised cutaneous adnexal malignancy that was completely excised with clear margins, sentinel-node negative (pN0), with no distant metastasis (M0) (1).

She was discharged on postoperative day 3. After consultation with a radiation oncologist, postoperative radiotherapy was not considered necessary. This decision followed multidisciplinary discussion and reflected the complete excision with histologically clear margins, a tumour-negative sentinel lymph node and the absence of regional or distant metastasis. She was reviewed in the outpatient clinic at 15 days for postoperative wound assessment and again at three months and six months. At each visit there was no clinical or radiological evidence of local recurrence, regional lymphadenopathy, or distant metastasis.

Discussion

Skin tumours arising from the outer root sheath of hair follicles with trichilemmal-type keratinisation include the trichilemmal cyst, the PTT and its MPTT. PTT is an uncommon, usually benign, well-circumscribed subcutaneous lesion that can closely mimic squamous cell carcinoma both clinically and microscopically; it is also known as proliferating trichilemmal cyst or pilar tumour of the scalp (2). It was first described by Wilson-Jones in 1966 as a proliferating epidermoid cyst and in 1995 it was recognised as an entity distinct from the proliferating epidermoid cyst (1). Around 90% of PTTs arise on the scalp, with rarer reports on the forehead, nose, back, chest, abdomen, buttocks, elbow, wrist and vulva (3),(4). Most patients are women, typically in the sixth-to-seventh decade (5).

Malignant transformation is rare and is often heralded by sudden rapid growth. Histologically, MPTT shows marked nuclear atypia, cellular pleomorphism, atypical mitoses, dyskeratotic cells and infiltrative margins (6). In the present patient, a year-long swelling that enlarged rapidly over five months raised suspicion of malignancy and microscopy confirmed it through infiltrative borders, nuclear atypia and increased mitotic activity (8 per 10 HPF). Ye J et al., proposed a useful histological grouping (benign, low-grade and frankly malignant) that helps distinguish MPTT from squamous cell carcinoma; the present case corresponds to the frankly malignant group (1),(7). Headington introduced the term “malignant proliferating trichilemmal cyst” for proliferating trichilemmal cysts undergoing malignant change; its true incidence is unknown owing to rarity and frequent misclassification as squamous cell carcinoma (8). Histological features that favour MPTT over conventional squamous cell carcinoma include lobulated masses arising from the outer root sheath, abrupt trichilemmal-type keratinisation without an intervening granular layer and a continuous spectrum from benign to frankly malignant change; careful assessment of resection margins, mitotic rate and infiltrative growth helps to confirm frank malignancy and to guide management.

Two features make the present case noteworthy. First, the young age: MPTT in adolescents is exceptional, with most series reporting a mean age in the seventh decade; one of the youngest well-documented cases was a 26-year-old woman (9). Second, the deltoid (extra-scalp) location, since the great majority of cases is scalp lesions. Recent reports have documented MPTT at other unusual sites - the clavicular region (10), the auricle (11), the thumb (12) and the neck with nodal metastasis (13) - and have emphasised aggressive or recurrent behaviour requiring multimodality treatment (14). The present case adds an adolescent deltoid presentation that was localised, node-negative and completely resected.

The management of MPTT mirrors that of other malignant skin tumours: wide local excision with clear margins is the treatment of choice, with sentinel lymph node assessment helpful for nodal staging in suitable cases. Radiotherapy has been reported as an alternative for unresectable or refractory tumours (14). Long-term follow-up is essential because the rarity of the disease precludes firm conclusions about adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is not standardised and has generally been reserved for unresectable, recurrent, or incompletely excised tumours and for cases with other high-risk features, with the available evidence limited to case reports and small series; it was therefore not used in the present patient, who had a completely excised, node-negative lesion. Scheduled reviews at 15 days, three months and six months showed no recurrence, a pattern consistent with the close early surveillance advised after complete excision of MPTT; longer-term follow-up is being continued because late recurrence and metastasis are recognised.

Conclusion

The MPTTs are rare and diagnostically challenging because they closely resemble squamous cell carcinoma and may therefore be under-reported. The present case underscores that MPTT can occur in adolescents and at unusual extra-scalp sites such as the deltoid region. Wide surgical excision with histologically clear margins remains the primary treatment, while the role of adjuvant therapy requires further study.

Author Contributions: Both authors managed this patient as resident surgeons in the same surgical unit; the affiliations shown reflect their current institutional positions. AC performed the clinical evaluation and perioperative management, collected the data, reviewed the literature and drafted and critically revised the manuscript. ANK contributed to the surgical planning and operative management, interpreted the imaging and histopathology findings and critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References

1.
Ye J, Nappi O, Swanson PE, Patterson JW, Wick MR. Proliferating pilar tumors: A clinicopathologic study of 76 cases with a proposal for definition of benign and malignant variants. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122(4):566-74.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Brownstein MH, Arluk DJ. Proliferating trichilemmal cyst: A simulant of squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1981;48(5):1207-14.3.0.CO;2-1>[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Janitz J, Wiedersberg H. Trichilemmal pilar tumors. Cancer. 1980;45(6):1594-97.3.0.CO;2-O>[crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Park BS, Yang SG, Cho KH. Malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor showing distant metastases. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19(5):536-39.[crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Jain B, Bhattacharya S, Goyal S, Jana S. Malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(1):50-52.[crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Markal N, Kurtay A, Velidedeoglu H, Hucumenoglu S. Malignant transformation of a giant proliferating trichilemmal tumor of the scalp: Patient report and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41(3):314-16.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Siatecka H, Diwan AH, Finch CJ, Haskins AD, Hernandez DJ, Xu Y, et al. A rare case of a malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor: A molecular study harboring potential therapeutic significance and a review of literature. Dermatopathology (Basel). 2024;11(4):354-63.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Headington JT. Tumors of the hair follicle: A review. Am J Pathol. 1976;85(2):479-514.
9.
Rao S, Ramakrishnan R, Kamakshi D, Chakravarthi S, Sundaram S, Prathiba D. Malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumour presenting early in life: An uncommon feature. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011;4(1):51-53.[crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Aabalou H, Majdoubi A, El Achchi A, Kharkhach A, Bouhout T, Serji B. Malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor of the clavicular region: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025;132:111667.[crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Zhou E, Xue X, Liu X, Zhang Y. Auricular malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor: A case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2025;104(1 Suppl):174S-176S. Doi: 10.1177/01455613221127586. PMID: 36123767.[crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Wang G, Zhou X, Luo J, Hu Q, Zhang J. Case report: Malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor of the thumb. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1005206.[crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Wang K, Wen JZ, Zhou SX, Ye LF, Fang C, Chen Y, et al. Malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumour of the neck with lymph node metastasis: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(28):6949-54. PMID: 37901030.[crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Vargas-Ardila PA, Bonilla-Lersundy MC, Freire-Figueroa IA, Augusto-Montoya F. Extensive calvarial reconstruction for recurrent scalp malignant proliferating trichilemmal tumor: Case report. Asian J Neurosurg. 2026;21(2):386-94.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/88139.24387

Date of Submission: Apr 25, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jun 01, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 18, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 26, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 14, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 16, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com