Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 14959

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : SD01 - SD03 Full Version

An Atypical Presentation of Congenital Syphilis with Pseudoparalysis and Nephrotic Syndrome in a 45-day-old Infant: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/85389.24260
Kshitij Sharma, MG Ravanagomagan

1. Junior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
MG Ravanagomagan,
G-4, R Block, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital (SBMCH),
Chromepet, Chennai-600044, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drmgr04@gmail.com

Abstract

Congenital syphilis is a preventable infection transmitted from mother to foetus through the placenta by Treponema pallidum and continues to contribute to considerable neonatal illness and death. The disease can affect multiple organs, including the skin, bones, liver, kidneys, and central nervous system, and may present with diverse and unusual clinical features. Prompt identification is crucial, as delayed diagnosis can result in serious complications even when appropriate treatment is given. A 45-day-old male infant presented with reduced limb movements, irritability, and fever. Examination revealed hepatosplenomegaly, desquamation of palms and soles, and radiographic findings including metaphyseal destruction (Wimberger sign) and ‘celery-stalk’ appearance of the distal femur. The infant subsequently developed congenital nephrotic syndrome. Although the mother’s antenatal Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) screening was reported negative, the combination of clinical, radiological, and serological findings established the diagnosis of congenital syphilis. Despite prompt treatment with crystalline penicillin and supportive therapy, the infant succumbed to sepsis during the third week of illness. This case highlights an unusual presentation of congenital syphilis masquerading as neuromuscular weakness, later complicated by nephrosis, emphasising the importance of high clinical suspicion and multidisciplinary evaluation in atypical neonatal presentations.

Keywords

Disease transmission, Neurosyphilis, Osteochondritis, Periostitis, Treponema pallidum, Vertical transmission

Case Report

A 45-day-old male infant was brought to the Department of Paediatrics with the chief complaints of reduced movements of all four limbs for one week and low-grade fever for five days. He was the second child of a non-consanguineous marriage, born at term by normal vaginal delivery with a birth weight of 2.5 kg (50th percentile for gestational age) (appropriate for gestational age). The antenatal period was uneventful, and the mother’s antenatal VDRL screening was reported as non-reactive. There was no relevant family history of neurological, renal, or infectious illness. The infant had been apparently well until 38 days of life, when the parents noticed increasing irritability and reluctance to move the limbs, particularly on handling, suggestive of pain-related immobility. This was associated with constipation for one week and intermittent low-grade fever for five days. There was no history of seizures, trauma, poor feeding, vomiting, or respiratory symptoms. Honey ingestion on the 15th day of life was reported as a traditional practice.

On examination, the infant was alert with an irritable cry. Vital parameters were stable: Temperature: 37.8°C, heart rate 140/min, respiratory rate 44/min, and blood pressure 88/60 mmHg (50-90th percentile). Diffuse plantar desquamation involving approximately 60-70% of the plantar surface bilaterally was noted, predominantly over the heel and mid-plantar regions, without ulceration or active discharge. Similar desquamation was noted over the palmar surfaces bilaterally on clinical examination (Table/Fig 1). The liver was palpable 4 cm below the right costal margin and the spleen 2 cm below the left costal margin. A reducible umbilical hernia was present without signs of obstruction (Table/Fig 2). Neurological examination revealed generalised hypotonia with muscle power of 2/5 in the upper limbs and 3/5 in the lower limbs. Deep tendon reflexes were not elicitable. Cranial nerve examination was normal. Initial laboratory evaluation showed leukocytosis (16300 cells/cumm) with elevated inflammatory markers {raised C-Reactive Protein (CRP)- 52.3 mg/L} and organomegaly (hepatomegaly and splenomegaly), raising suspicion of sepsis. However, the infant was feeding well, not lethargic, and no focus of infection was identified, blood culture reports were inconclusive. Although the infant’s serum vitamin B12 level was low (84 pg/mL), maternal vitamin B12 level was normal (294 pg/mL). Haemoglobin was 8.9 g/dL with a normal Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV: 88 fL). Peripheral smear did not show macro-ovalocytes or hypersegmented neutrophils. There was no evidence of pancytopenia. These findings ruled out megaloblastic anaemia. Nerve conduction studies revealed non-stimulable nerves, suggestive of polyradiculopathy.

Differential diagnoses considered included sepsis, septic arthritis, congenital Guillain-Barré syndrome, infant botulism, peripheral neuropathy secondary to vitamin B12 deficiency, and myopathy. These were ruled out based on preserved sensorium, absence of bulbar involvement, normal joint examination, lack of progressive paralysis, absence of haematological features of B12 deficiency, and characteristic radiological findings. A skeletal survey performed to evaluate for local pathology revealed metaphyseal destruction involving wrist, knee, and ankle joints (Wimberger sign), periosteal reaction with a “celery-stalk” appearance of the distal femur, sutural widening, and frontal bossing (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5). These findings raised strong suspicion of congenital infection. Infant serology showed a reactive VDRL with a titre of 1:256. Repeat maternal serology performed postpartum showed a reactive VDRL with a titre of 1:8. The infant titre being more than fourfold higher than the maternal titre confirmed the diagnosis of congenital syphilis. Treponemal IgM antibodies were positive. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis could not be performed due to rapid clinical deterioration. A diagnosis of congenital syphilis presenting as Parrot’s pseudoparalysis was made. Despite abnormal nerve conduction studies, the limb immobility was attributed to painful osteochondritis rather than primary neuropathy.

The infant was started on intravenous crystalline penicillin G at a dose of 50,000 IU/kg/dose every 12 hours for 10 days, along with intramuscular cyanocobalamin at a dose of 50 μg/kg/day once daily and supportive care. During the second week of hospitalisation, the infant developed bilateral pedal oedema progressing to anasarca over 3-4 days (Table/Fig 6). Urinalysis revealed heavy proteinuria, and serum albumin was 1.5 g/dL, confirming nephrotic syndrome. Further nephrotic evaluation could not be completed due to worsening clinical condition. Despite aggressive supportive management, human albumin 20% was administered at a dose of 1 g/kg intravenously over 3-4 hours on two occasions. Intravenous furosemide was given at 1 mg/kg/dose following albumin infusion. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics (meropenem 20 mg/kg/dose every eight hours and vancomycin 15 mg/kg/dose every six hours) were initiated for suspected sepsis and continued for seven days.

The infant developed sepsis. The clinical condition deteriorated, and the infant succumbed during the third week of illness.

Discussion

This case illustrates the protean manifestations of congenital syphilis and emphasises that it can mimic a wide range of neonatal disorders, including neuromuscular and renal diseases. Transplacental transmission of Treponema pallidum from an infected mother usually results in congenital syphilis, and the timing of fetal exposure along with the maternal stage of disease determines the severity of infection. Although antenatal VDRL screening is widely practiced, false-negative results may occur during early maternal infection, late seroconversion, or due to the prozone phenomenon, resulting in missed opportunities for prevention (1).

The infant in this report presented with pseudoparalysis, a rare but recognised manifestation of congenital syphilis. Pseudoparalysis (Parrot’s pseudoparalysis) arises from painful periostitis or osteochondritis leading to limb immobility without true neurological deficit. Such infants may initially be misdiagnosed with neuromuscular weakness or neuropathy, delaying appropriate therapy. In this case, the radiographic findings - particularly metaphyseal destruction (Wimberger sign) and the “celery-stalk” appearance of the femur - were critical in establishing the diagnosis (2). Similar to the report by Kim YH et al., our patient developed nephrotic syndrome in the second week of illness despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, underscoring that renal pathology may persist even after bacterial eradication (3). Other published case reports have described infants presenting with musculoskeletal manifestations of congenital syphilis where radiological findings played a pivotal diagnostic role, particularly when maternal screening was negative (4).

Renal involvement in congenital syphilis has been documented over the years. Bhorade MS and Chawla LS in 2004 described immune-complex–mediated renal injury in congenital syphilis (5). Wang C et al., in 2023 reported early congenital syphilis with nephropathy in a retrospective cohort (6). Sankaran D et al., highlighted that congenital syphilis continues to show diverse multisystem involvement and may present with atypical skeletal or systemic manifestations in early infancy, often leading to delayed diagnosis despite routine antenatal screening (7). Salomè S et al., emphasised that failures in repeat maternal testing and gaps in antenatal follow-up remain key contributors to ongoing cases of congenital syphilis, underscoring the need for high clinical suspicion even when initial screening is negative (8). Toledano GM de ON et al., in 2021 further highlighted congenital nephrotic syndrome secondary to syphilis (9). In larger paediatric observations, Garcia LN et al., in 2021 demonstrated multisystem involvement including skeletal manifestations (10), while Tascón-Barona A et al., in 2024 described a preterm newborn with metaphysitis visible on long-bone radiographs, highlighting that skeletal changes can be present even without overt clinical symptoms (11). Miranda IPC et al., in 2025 reported a rare case of early congenital syphilis associated with femur agenesis, underscoring the potential for profound skeletal anomalies (12). In addition, Mohora R et al., in 2025 provided comprehensive clinical and serological observations, reinforcing the value of repeat testing and long-term follow-up (13). These reports collectively substantiate that congenital syphilis continues to present with varied multisystem manifestations, warranting high clinical suspicion even when antenatal screening is non-reactive.

This case also highlights that a negative maternal screening test does not exclude congenital syphilis. As emphasised by Stafford IA et al., a high index of clinical suspicion and repeat serological testing are warranted when the neonate presents with suggestive features (1). Radiological evaluation, particularly long-bone X-rays, remains an invaluable diagnostic tool when laboratory results are inconclusive. Early initiation of penicillin therapy remains the cornerstone of management and significantly reduces morbidity and mortality when administered promptly. However, in cases complicated by multiorgan involvement such as nephrosis and sepsis, prognosis remains guarded even with adequate treatment. Multidisciplinary care involving neonatology, infectious disease, and radiology teams is essential for optimal outcomes.

Conclusion

Congenital syphilis remains a diagnostic challenge due to its wide spectrum of clinical presentations. This case emphasises that infants presenting with unexplained neuromuscular weakness or renal involvement should be evaluated for congenital syphilis, even in the setting of a negative maternal screening history. Early radiographic and serological evaluation facilitates prompt diagnosis and management.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the contributions of the Departments of Radiology, Paediatric Neurology, and Dermatology & Venereology at Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital for their support in the diagnosis and management of this case.

References

1.
Stafford IA, Workowski KA, Bachmann LH. Syphilis complicating pregnancy and congenital syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(3):242-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Shahrook S, Sapkal GN, Poojary A. Parrot’s pseudoparalysis: A forgotten manifestation of congenital syphilis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(9):TD01-TD02.
3.
Kim YH, Song JH, Kim CJ, Yang EM. Congenital syphilis presenting with only nephrotic syndrome: Reemergence of a forgotten disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(8):1374-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Chawla D, Agarwal R, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Skeletal manifestations of congenital syphilis: Revisiting the radiological clues. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(3):271-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Bhorade MS, Chawla LS. Renal manifestations of congenital syphilis: Case report and review of literature. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19(10):1162-65.
6.
Wang C, Lun W, Pang L. Clinical characteristics of infants hospitalized with early congenital syphilitic nephropathy: A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study in China. BMC Pediatr. 2023;23(1):442. Doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04250-4. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Sankaran D, Lakshminrusimha S, Guillet R. Congenital syphilis: An illustrative review with emphasis on current epidemiology and clinical spectrum. Children (Basel). 2023;10(8):1310. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Salomè S, Cambriglia MD, Montesano G, Capasso L, Raimondi F. Congenital syphilis: A re-emerging but preventable infection. Pathogens. 2024;13(6):481. Doi: 10.3390/pathogens13060481. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Toledano GM de ON, Cardoso CO. Congenital nephrotic syndrome due to congenital syphilis: A case report. Electron J Gen Med.2021;18(2):em28. [crossref]
10.
Garcia LN, Destito Solján A, Moroni S, Falk N, Gonzalez N, Moscatelli G, Ballering G, García Bournissen F, Altcheh JM. Congenital syphilis in Argentina: Experience in a pediatric hospital. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(1):e0009010. Doi: 10.1371/ journal.pntd.0009010. PMID: 33406082; PMCID: PMC7815155. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Tascón-Barona A, Vallejo-Prieto J, López-Gutiérrez J, Martínez-Pérez A, Gómez- Ruiz C. Bone abnormalities in congenital syphilis: A case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2024;19(12):5654-59.
12.
Miranda IPC, Nascimento MVB, Sousa da Costa BDP, Almeida RAS, Ferreira MLP. Early congenital syphilis and femur agenesis: A case report. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25(1):60. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Mohora R, Diaconu A, Stoicescu S, Cristea O. A comprehensive congenital syphilis case report with evidence-based insights into current practices. J Med Life. 2025;18(4):324-31 [crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/85389.24260

Date of Submission: Nov 14, 2025
Date of Peer Review: Jan 31, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Mar 31, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 18, 2025
• Manual Googling: Mar 26, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Mar 28, 2026 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com