Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 215960

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : TD07 - TD09 Full Version

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumour Co-existing with Crohn’s Disease: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87818.24307
Virendra Kumar Meena, Aman Khandelwal, Ravinder Kumar Kundu

1. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. 3rd Year Postgraduate Student, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Head, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Aman Khandelwal,
RSG The Universe, Sector 9 (SAVINA), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: amankh2428@gmail.com

Abstract

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms, while Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder characterised by transmural inflammation and skip lesions. The co-existence of these two conditions is exceedingly uncommon. We report the case of a 62-year-old female presenting with non-specific abdominal symptoms, in whom Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) revealed a hypervascular lesion in the neck of the pancreas with arterial enhancement and venous washout, consistent with a PNET, along with discontinuous small-bowel wall thickening suggestive of Crohn’s disease. Histopathological examination of resected ileocolonic specimens confirmed Crohn’s disease by demonstrating transmural inflammation and non-caseating granulomas. This case highlights the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced imaging in detecting concurrent pancreatic and bowel pathology and underscores the importance of histopathology in confirming inflammatory bowel disease.

Keywords

Arterial enhancement, Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), Insulinoma, Multidisciplinary management, Venous washout

Case Report

A 62-year-old female presented with nonspecific abdominal symptoms along with giddiness for two weeks. The patient had a history of hypoglycaemia for two years. Baseline laboratory investigations revealed haemoglobin 12.6 g/dL, total leukocyte count 7.8×109/L, platelet count 265×109/L, fasting blood glucose 48 mg/dL, serum creatinine 0.8 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen 18 mg/dL, serum sodium 138 mmol/L, serum potassium 4.2 mmol/L, total bilirubin 0.7 mg/dL, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) 28 U/L, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) 25 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 92 U/L, and serum amylase and lipase within normal limits.

Arterial-phase CECT revealed a well-circumscribed, intensely enhancing lesion measuring approximately 2.5 cm in the neck of the pancreas (Table/Fig 1)a. On portal venous phase imaging, the lesion demonstrated relative contrast washout (Table/Fig 1)b, consistent with a hypervascular pancreatic mass suggestive of a PNET. There was no associated pancreatic ductal dilatation or peripancreatic inflammatory change. Additionally, CECT demonstrated multiple discontinuous segments of small-bowel wall thickening with prominent mucosal hyperenhancement, forming skip lesions across different portions of the small intestine (Table/Fig 1)c, (Table/Fig 1)b, (Table/Fig 1)e, (Table/Fig 1)f. No radiologic evidence of bowel obstruction, abscess, fistula, or perforation was identified.

Based on the characteristic imaging findings, a provisional diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease was made preoperatively. Crohn’s disease was suspected radiologically because of the presence of skip lesions and segmental bowel wall thickening.

Given the history of recurrent hypoglycaemic episodes for two years, biochemical evaluation was performed. During symptomatic hypoglycaemia, plasma glucose was 38 mg/dL, serum insulin was 18.6 μIU/mL, and C-peptide was 3.8 ng/mL, findings consistent with endogenous hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. A fasting test demonstrated persistent insulin secretion despite hypoglycaemia, with plasma glucose falling to 42 mg/dL while serum insulin remained elevated at 12.4 μIU/mL, supporting the diagnosis of insulinoma.

Surgical intervention was undertaken primarily for management of the suspected insulinoma causing recurrent hypoglycaemia. The patient subsequently underwent surgical intervention, during which enucleation of an insulinoma was performed. Intraoperatively, a 1.5×1.5 cm hard tumour was identified in the body of the pancreas, reflecting differences between radiological and intraoperative assessment, since imaging showed an approximate 2.5 cm lesion. The apparent discrepancy in lesion location reflects differences in anatomical description between radiological and intraoperative assessments. As the lesion was located at the neck–body junction of the pancreas, both descriptions refer to the same lesion.

Following enucleation, the pancreatic duct was intact, and no pancreatic juice leak was identified; the remaining pancreas appeared soft. Additionally, the terminal ileum was noted to contain multiple palpable strictures with mesenteric fat wrapping, suggestive of Crohn’s disease.

In addition to pancreatic tumour enucleation, the patient underwent ileocolic resection involving approximately 15 cm of terminal ileum and the adjacent caecum and ascending colon because of multiple strictures and gross inflammatory changes. The resected specimen was subsequently submitted for histopathological examination.

Microscopic examination revealed chronic active inflammatory bowel disease with marked crypt architectural distortion, dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the lamina propria, focal cryptitis, and occasional crypt abscesses (Table/Fig 2c). Inflammation extended into the submucosa, indicating transmural involvement (Table/Fig 2)a. Well-formed non-caseating epithelioid granulomas were identified within the lamina propria, confirming the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (Table/Fig 2)b. Histopathological examination revealed uniform round-to-oval cells arranged in nests and trabeculae separated by delicate fibrovascular stroma. The tumour cells exhibited finely granular eosinophilic cytoplasm and characteristic salt-and-pepper chromatin, with minimal nuclear atypia. The mitotic index was low (<2 mitoses/2 mm2, approximately 10 high-power fields), consistent with a low-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. Gross examination demonstrated a well-circumscribed tumour measuring 1.5 × 1.5 cm.

The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient experienced complete resolution of hypoglycaemic symptoms following insulinoma enucleation. No pancreatic fistula or other major postoperative complications were observed. At six months follow-up, the patient remained symptomatically improved, with no radiological evidence of tumour recurrence.

Discussion

The PNETs are rare neoplasms arising from the endocrine cells of the pancreas, comprising approximately 2% of all pancreatic tumours (1). These tumours exhibit a wide range of clinical behaviours, from indolent to highly aggressive, and can be either functional (secreting hormones causing distinct syndromes) or non-functional (1). In contrast, Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterised by transmural inflammation, often presenting with skip lesions throughout the gastrointestinal tract (2).

Although neuroendocrine tumours, particularly ileal NETs, have been reported in association with inflammatory bowel disease, the co-existence of PNETs with Crohn’s disease remains poorly documented and not well established (3),(4).

One proposed mechanism is that chronic inflammation in Crohn’s disease may promote tumourigenesis through sustained cytokine release, oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby creating a microenvironment favourable for neoplasm development, including neuroendocrine tumours (5). Alternatively, PNETs may influence gastrointestinal inflammatory pathways, or both conditions may develop independently due to shared genetic or environmental factors. To date, however, there is no direct evidence supporting a causal relationship.

Diagnostic imaging, particularly CECT, plays a pivotal role in identifying both conditions. PNETs characteristically demonstrate intense arterial-phase enhancement with subsequent portal venous washout, reflecting their hypervascular nature (6). In Crohn’s disease, CECT effectively depicts skip lesions, bowel wall thickening, and mucosal hyperenhancement, consistent with active inflammation (3).

Although the imaging findings strongly suggested Crohn’s disease, differential diagnoses for segmental bowel wall thickening and skip lesions include intestinal tuberculosis, ischemic enteritis, NSAID-induced enteropathy, infectious enterocolitis, and lymphoma (7). In the present case, the presence of transmural inflammation together with well-formed non-caseating granulomas and characteristic architectural distortion favoured Crohn’s disease over these alternative diagnoses.

Nuclear imaging plays a key role in the management of PNETs by enabling functional localisation and staging through somatostatin receptor imaging (e.g., Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT). It also helps assess tumour burden, detect metastases, and determine suitability for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) (8).

A study by Bassoff L et al., 2025, highlighted that non-functioning PNETs often present silently and are frequently detected incidentally on imaging due to the absence of hormonal symptoms. The study emphasised the pivotal role of radiological modalities in diagnosis and noted that surgical resection remains the mainstay of definitive management, with careful follow-up required due to variable clinical behaviour (9).

Management of patients with co-existing PNET and Crohn’s disease requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for PNETs, while Crohn’s disease is managed medically using anti-inflammatory agents, immunomodulators, and biologic therapies (1),(10). Given the rarity of this association, individualised treatment strategies are essential to optimise patient outcomes.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the rare coexistence of a PNET and Crohn’s disease. CECT enabled early identification of the hypervascular pancreatic lesion and inflammatory bowel changes, while histopathology confirmed Crohn’s disease through non-caseating granulomas and transmural inflammation.

References

1.
Sulciner ML, Clancy TE. Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(7):2006. Doi: 10.3390/cancers15072006. PMID: 37046665; PMCID: PMC10093271. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Parray FQ, Wani ML, Bijli AH, Thakur N, Irshad I, Nayeem-ul-Hassan. Crohn’s disease: A surgeon’s perspective. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(1):6-15. Doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.74430. PMID: 21196646; PMCID: PMC3099084. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Abuassi M, Peles S, Alfar B, Obed A. Neuroendocrine tumour of the terminal ileum presenting as refractory Crohn’s disease: A diagnostic challenge. ACG Case Rep J. 2025;12(10):e01861. Doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001861. PMID: 41112852; PMCID: PMC12528589. [crossref] ?pmid 41112852>[PubMed]
4.
Azzam N. A rare case of rectal adenocarcinoma and small-bowel neuroendocrine Tumour in a young patient with long-standing Crohn’s disease: A case report. Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine. 2021;4(2):209-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/JNSM.JNSM_114_20. [crossref]
5.
Haque PS, Kapur N, Barrett TA, Theiss AL. Mitochondrial function and gastrointestinal diseases. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21:537-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-024-00931-2. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Battistella A, Partelli S, Andreasi V, Marinoni I, Palumbo D, Tacelli M, et al. Preoperative assessment of microvessel density in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PanNETs). Surgery. 2022;172:1236-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURG.2022.06.017. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Bakkalog?lu OK, Çelik AF. Differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. J Enterocolitis 2025;4:20-27. https://doi.org/10.14744/Jenterocolitis.2025. 82883. [crossref]
8.
Prosperi D, Gentiloni Silveri G, Panzuto F, Faggiano A, Russo V, Caruso D, et al. Nuclear medicine and radiological imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multidisciplinary update. J Clin Med. 2022;11:6836-42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226836. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Bassoff L, Kersey K, Debus I, Glotzer D. The silent presentation of a non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour: A case report. Cureus. 2025;17:e89256-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Cushing K, Higgins PDR. Management of Crohn disease: A review. JAMA. 2021;325:69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2020.18936 [crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87818.24307

Date of Submission: Jan 29, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Mar 16, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 27, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 02, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 04, 2026 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com