Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 5243

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : UD01 - UD04 Full Version

Anaesthetic Management of Multivalvular Surgery Complicated by Submitral Aneurysm and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87684.24238
Abhigna Gummalla, Vivek Chakole, Amreesh Paul Francis

1. Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Abhigna Gummalla,
Resident Hostel, JNMC, DMIHER, Wardha-442107, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: abhigna.gummalla@gmail.com

Abstract

Submitral Aneurysm (SMA) is a rare cardiac condition that presents with perioperative anaesthetic complications, especially with comorbidities such as Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) and severe valvular disease. The case reported is a 21-year-old female with a medical illness history of rheumatic heart disease, severe mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), PH, and basal SMA. She was admitted with palpitations, dyspnoea, and cough. Preoperative assessment revealed ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary disease. She was to undergo general anaesthesia for Mitral Valve Replacement (MVR), tricuspid valve repair, and SMA repair. Anaesthesia management included maintaining cardiac output, preserving right ventricular function, and controlling pulmonary pressures. Invasive monitoring and intraoperative echocardiography were used. Postoperative intensive care unit management was carried out, and ventilatory support was weaned on the 2nd postoperative day. The postoperative course was uneventful, with enhanced functional capacity and satisfactory echocardiographic parameters at follow-up. The case highlights the complexity of anaesthetic care for multivalvular heart disease with SMA and PH. It underscores the need for personalised treatment, precise monitoring, and multidisciplinary care for successful management.

Keywords

Cardiac anaesthesia, Cardiac surgery, Mitral regurgitation, Tricuspid regurgitation

Case Report

A 21-year-old female, weighing 43 kg and with a height of 160 cm {Body Mass Index (BMI) 16.8 kg/m²} presented with a one-month history of palpitations, worsening exertional dyspnoea, and nonproductive cough. She had a known history of rheumatic heart disease for 17 years. She did not complain of chest pain, syncope, or fever. At presentation, the patient was tachycardic with a heart rate of 108 beats/min, blood pressure of 96/60 mmHg, respiratory rate of 24 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation of 94% on room air. Electrocardiography revealed sinus tachycardia without ischaemic changes. Functional status was New York Heart Association class IV, with dyspnea even at rest. On examination, the patient was dyspneic at rest. Her dyspnea corresponded to modified Medical Research Council grade 4. Jugular venous pressure was elevated, and bilateral pitting pedal oedema was present. Cardiovascular examination revealed a pansystolic murmur at the apex radiating to the axilla. Abdominal examination revealed mild splenomegaly. Respiratory examination revealed bibasilar crepitus. Airway examination was within normal limits with good mouth opening, Mallampati class II, normal neck movement, and satisfactory thyromental distance.

Laboratory findings revealed haemoglobin of 11.1 g/dL, absolute leucocyte count of 16,300/mm³, and platelet count of 1.85×105 /mm³. Liver and renal function tests were normal. High-resolution thoracic computed tomography revealed cardiomegaly, pulmonary oedema, and fibrous bands in the right upper, middle, and lower lobes and left upper lobe. Echocardiography was indicative of an SMA, severe Mitral Regurgitation (MR), severe TR, severe PH, global left ventricular hypokinesia, and a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 42%.

Quantitative echocardiographic assessment demonstrated severe PH, with an estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of approximately 72 mmHg and a right ventricular systolic pressure of approximately 75 mmHg. Right ventricular function was moderately impaired with a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion of 14 mm and mild right ventricular dilatation. The SMA measured approximately 4.2×3.6 cm and was located along the posterior mitral annulus adjacent to the posterior mitral leaflet. The aneurysm communicated with the left ventricle through a neck measuring approximately 1.2 cm in width. No intraluminal thrombus was visualised within the aneurysmal sac on echocardiographic assessment. The patient was classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV.

She was scheduled for MVR, tricuspid valve repair, and SMA repair. For preoperative optimisation, the following was done: Cautious use of diuretics with intravenous furosemide 20 mg twice a day to relieve pulmonary congestion; Continued metoprolol 12.5 mg once a day; and maintain euvolaemia. Supplemental oxygen was administered to achieve an oxygen saturation above 96%. The patient’s packed red blood cells were cross-matched to anticipate intraoperative blood loss and possible haemodilution during Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB). The standard ASA monitoring devices were used intraoperatively. The induction of anaesthesia was with intravenous fentanyl 100 μg, midazolam 2 mg, and propofol 70 mg, using vecuronium 6 mg for paralysis prior to intubating the patient with a 7.5 mm cuffed endotracheal tube. Vascular access was achieved with a 7 Fr right internal jugular central line and a 20-gauge radial arterial line.

Anaesthesia was achieved through inhalation of isoflurane gas mixed with air. It was supplemented once during this period with analgesic boluses (50 μg) of fentanyl intermittently plus additional use of vecuronium boluses (1 mg). Ventilation followed a lungprotective approach, using tidal volumes of approximately 6-7 mL/ kg and a rate of 14-16 breaths/min, with a positive end-expiratory pressure of approximately 4 cm H2 O. To avoid hypercarbia due to elevated end-tidal CO2 concentrations, mechanical ventilation rates were adjusted as needed to maintain an end-tidal CO2 level between 35 mmHg and 38 mmHg. Fraction of inspired oxygen was regulated between 0.5 and 0.6 to maintain arterial oxygen saturation >98% while avoiding hypoxia and/or further increases in pulmonary vascular resistance.

The surgery was performed using CPB with systemic heparinisation (300 IU/kg) and cold blood cardioplegia for cardioplegic arrest. The total time on CPB was approximately 128 minutes, with aortic crossclamp time of 92 minutes. During surgery, the patient required light inotropic support from norepinephrine (0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min) and milrinone (0.3-0.5 μg/kg/min) to maintain haemodynamic stability. The mitral valve was replaced with a mechanical prosthesis; the tricuspid valve was corrected with an annuloplasty ring; and the SMA was successfully removed and repaired. After surgical repair and replacement of the valve, Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) showed that the mechanical mitral prosthesis was appropriately seated, with no paravalvular leak; trace TR; and that the SMA repair was intact. There was an increase in the strength of the muscle contraction in the ventricle. Weaning from the CPB was assisted by gradual rewarming, preload optimisation, and right-sided heart support with milrinone and norepinephrine to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance. After weaning from the bypass, the patient had stable haemodynamics and good urine output.

After surgery, the patient was moved into the intensive care unit, where she was intubated and mechanically ventilated, with sedation maintained using midazolam at 0.02-0.05 mg/kg/h and analgesia via fentanyl at 1-2 μg/kg/h. The inotropic medications were slowly taken off over 24 hours. The patient was extubated without complications on postoperative day 2, after meeting the usual extubation criteria. The patient had stable haemodynamics, was on 2 L/min of oxygen via nasal cannula, and was alert and oriented. On postoperative day four, she was moved to a regular nursing unit, where she was discharged on postoperative day 10. She was stable with normal vital signs and discharged on anticoagulation therapy, beta-blockers, and diuretics.

During both her one- and three-month follow-up visits, the patient did not complain of shortness of breath, difficulty keeping up with physical activity, or irregular heartbeats. A follow-up echocardiogram showed a well-functioning prosthetic mitral valve, minimal to mild residual TR, and an LVEF of 50% to 52% without residual aneurysms or signs of heart failure.

Discussion


Anaesthetic care of valvular heart disease, particularly of rheumatic aetiology, is complicated because of the complex interrelationship between compromised cardiac performance, PH, and systemic circulation haemodynamic compromise. Anaesthesia requires careful preplanning and technique to avoid complications and obtain optimal benefit (1),(2). In the present case, the coexistence of severe MR, severe TR, PH, and a large SMA created significant perioperative challenges. The anaesthetic goals were to maintain forward cardiac output, prevent increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, and preserve right ventricular function.

The MR leads to volume overload of the left ventricle, while TR leads to volume overload of the right ventricle. Regurgitant volume adds to left ventricular end-diastolic volume in MR, potentially deleterious to left ventricular function and reduced ejection fraction. In TR, right ventricular volume loading can be deleterious to right ventricular function and elevate systemic venous pressure. Atrioventricular synchrony must be maintained during surgery because atrial fibrillation increases volume load and reduces cardiac output. The treatment includes the administration of inotropes, such as milrinone, to enhance myocardial contractility, and pulmonary vasodilators, such as sildenafil, to reduce right ventricular afterload (3). In the present case, milrinone and norepinephrine were used intraoperatively to support right ventricular function and maintain systemic perfusion during weaning from CPB. Similar pharmacologic strategies have been described by Kalbande JV et al., who reported the use of dobutamine and noradrenaline following repair of a congenital SMA with severe MR (4). Likewise, Sun P described a patient with severe valvular disease and PH in whom aggressive haemodynamic support and early institution of CPB were required to prevent rapid circulatory deterioration (5). These reports highlight the importance of targeted inotropic support and maintenance of ventricular function in patients with combined valvular lesions and SMA (4),(5).

PH is challenging to control using anaesthetics because it compromises the right ventricular function. Anaesthetic drugs and methods that elevate pulmonary vascular resistance can cause acute right heart failure. To avoid this complication, anaesthetic care is planned preoperatively maintain or optimise preload while reducing afterload and ensure maximum right ventricular perfusion. Selective lowering of pulmonary vascular resistance can be achieved with inhalational anaesthetics, such as nitric oxide, or with intravenous prostacyclins, without affecting systemic vascular tone. To detect early decompensation, right ventricular function can also be monitored invasively using echocardiography and invasive haemodynamic monitoring (6),(7). In our patient, ventilation was carefully managed with controlled tidal volumes, minimal positive end expiratory pressure, avoidance of hypercarbia, and maintenance of adequate oxygenation to prevent increases in pulmonary vascular resistance. In the current case the patient’s low BMI (16.8 kg/m²) was also considered in the preoperative risk assessment. Sun et al. also highlighted the use of inhaled nitric oxide to selectively reduce pulmonary vascular resistance during surgery, while maintaining systemic vascular tone. In contrast, in the present case, pulmonary vasodilation was achieved pharmacologically with milrinone, without the need for inhaled nitric oxide (5).

Induction of anaesthesia in patients with life-threatening valvular heart disease requires drugs capable of opposing adverse haemodynamic changes. Propofol, although extremely favoured, causes vasodilatation and hypotension and hence should be titrated with great care. Opioids such as fentanyl cause analgesia and suppress sympathetic activity. Muscle relaxants such as vecuronium are used for intubation and surgical exposure on a weight- and renal function-corrected basis. Maintenance of anaesthesia is best achieved through the application of inhalation anaesthetic drugs such as isoflurane or sevoflurane supplemented with intravenous opioids as an adjunct for maintenance of anaesthesia to a proper comfort level. Monitoring must be closely performed to diagnose and treat perioperative complications (2),(8). In the present case, induction with fentanyl, midazolam, propofol, and vecuronium followed by maintenance with isoflurane and intermittent fentanyl provided stable intraoperative haemodynamics. Butiyani P and Kapuriya J described the use of etomidate-based induction in a patient with severe MR and markedly reduced ejection fraction undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, emphasising the importance of maintaining stable haemodynamics in the setting of compromised ventricular function. Kalbande JV et al., reported a morphine-based anaesthetic technique with titrated propofol and sevoflurane in a patient undergoing surgical repair of SMA, demonstrating that opioid-based anaesthesia can provide favourable haemodynamic stability in such high-risk patients (4),(9).

Ongoing intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring using invasive arterial lines and fluid resuscitation using central venous catheters to enable tracking of right atrial pressure complements basic ASA monitoring. TEE provides real-time cardiac anatomical and functional assessment and is particularly valuable for evaluating valve function and ventricular performance during cardiac surgery. During intraoperative care, special attention is given to maintaining optimal cardiac output, careful fluid management, and avoiding arrhythmias. Postoperatively, these patients require close monitoring in the intensive care unit, with careful titration of inotropes, fluid balance management, and early initiation of anticoagulation in patients receiving mechanical prosthetic valves (10),(11),(12). Kalbande JV et al., highlighted the crucial role of TEE in identifying aneurysmal anatomy and guiding surgical repair. Wani Z and Sharma M described an elderly patient with a multilocular SMA compressing the right pulmonary artery, in whom complex intraoperative findings and postoperative arrhythmias contributed to a high-risk clinical course. Compared with these cases, the present patient demonstrated a favourable perioperative recovery with stable haemodynamics, successful aneurysm repair, and early postoperative recovery (4),(12).

Several anaesthetic challenges are encountered in patients with SMA and severe valvular disease. These include maintaining forward cardiac output in the presence of significant regurgitant lesions, preventing increases in pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with PH, preserving right ventricular function, minimising the risk of arrhythmias due to atrial or ventricular dilatation, and the potential for sudden haemodynamic collapse during induction or CPB weaning. The presence of an SMA further complicates surgical and anaesthetic management due to distortion of the mitral annulus and risk of rupture or thromboembolism (4).

Alternative anaesthetic strategies have been described in the literature. Etomidate-based induction has been preferred due to its minimal cardiovascular depression, particularly in patients with severely reduced ventricular function. Similarly, inhaled nitric oxide or prostacyclin analogues may be used for selective pulmonary vasodilation in cases of severe PH. In the present case, these strategies were not employed because the patient maintained acceptable ventricular function and pulmonary haemodynamics with the chosen anaesthetic technique and pharmacologic support. Therefore, a balanced anaesthetic technique using opioid based induction, volatile anaesthetic maintenance, and targeted inotropic support was considered appropriate and resulted in a favourable perioperative outcome (5),(7),(13).

(Table/Fig 1) provides a comparative overview of anaesthetic and surgical strategies in managing valvular pathology and SMA across reported cases (4),(5),(9),(12).

Conclusion

This case highlights the successful anaesthetic management of a young patient with SMA and severe MR, TR, and PH. Careful preoperative optimisation, vigilant intraoperative monitoring, and a balanced anaesthetic technique helped maintain stable haemodynamics and prevent worsening of PH. Particular attention was directed toward preserving right ventricular function, avoiding increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, and ensuring adequate systemic perfusion. TEE and judicious inotropic support played an important role in guiding surgical repair and facilitating safe separation from CPB. This case emphasises that meticulous perioperative planning and multidisciplinary coordination are essential for achieving favourable outcomes in complex valvular heart disease with SMA.

References

1.
Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Dearani JA, Schaff HV. Valvular heart disease- A newevolving paradigm. Mayo Clin Proc. 2025;100(2):358-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Paul A, Das S. Valvular heart disease and anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth.2017;61(9):721-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Adare OE, Seife MA, Abate LG. Perioperative anesthesia management forpregnant mother with multivalvular heart disease and moderate pulmonaryhypertension who underwent caesarean section, in resource limiting area 2022:A case report. Int Med Case Rep J. 2023;16:311-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Kalbande JV, Singha SS, Bodhey N, Sahani P. Congenital sub-mitral aneurysm:Anesthetics and surgical management. Ann Card Anaesth. 2024;27(1):70-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Sun P. Anesthetic management of an unusual case of severe pulmonaryhypertensive. Asploro J Biomed Clin Case Rep. 2023;6(2):124-29. [crossref]
6.
Montani D, Günther S, Dorfmüller P, Perros F, Girerd B, Garcia G, et al. Pulmonaryarterial hypertension. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):97. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Price LC, Martinez G, Brame A, Pickworth T, Samaranayake C, Alexander D,et al. Perioperative management of patients with pulmonary hypertensionundergoing non-cardiothoracic, non-obstetric surgery: A systematic review andexpert consensus statement. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(4):774-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Brown EN, Pavone KJ, Naranjo M. Multimodal general anesthesia: Theory andpractice. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(5):1246-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Butiyani P, Kapuriya J. Anesthetic management for laparoscopic cholecystectomyin a patient with severe mitral regurgitation and severely depressed cardiacfunction. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2018;22(2):231-33.
10.
Das K, Sen J, Borode AS. Application of echocardiography in anaesthesia:From preoperative risk assessment to postoperative care. Cureus.2024;16(9):e69559. [crossref]
11.
Aseni P, Orsenigo S, Storti E, Pulici M, Arlati S. Current concepts ofperioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: A review. Patient Saf Surg.2019;13(1):32. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Wani Z, Sharma M. A rare case of submitral left ventricular aneurysms. Saudi JAnaesth. 2017;11(4):520-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Wagner CE, Bick JS, Johnson D, Ahmad R, Han X, Ehrenfeld JM, et al.Etomidate use and postoperative outcomes among cardiac surgery patients.Anesthesiology. 2014;120(3):579-89 [crossref]. [PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87684.24238

Date of Submission: Jan 28, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Mar 03, 2026
Date of Acceptance: May 02, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes


PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 14, 2026
• Manual Googling: Apr 28, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Apr 30, 2026 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com