Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 225089

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : YC22 - YC26 Full Version

Short-term Effect of Kinesio Taping on Arterial Blood Gas and Oxygen Saturation in Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/90024.24329
Shreeshail Patil, Shubha Akadas, Sweta D Kulkarni, Prashant Mukkannavar, Sangeeta Appannavar, Sunil Veerkar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Shri Hingulambika Education Society’s College of Physiotherapy, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, KLE College of Physiotherapy, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 5. Associate Professor, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 6. Lecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, SDM university, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sweta D Kulkarni,
Professor, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi-580028, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dr.shweta07@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is associated with impaired respiratory mechanics, postural abnormalities, and reduced oxygenation. A forward shoulder posture contributes to inefficient ventilation. Kinesio Taping (KT) has been proposed as a postural correction strategy to enhance respiratory efficiency in individuals with COPD.

Aim: To evaluate the short-term effect of KT on Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) parameters and Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD.

Materials and Methods: The present Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy and Department of Pulmonology, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, from September 2024 to August 2025 and included 40 participants aged 40-70 years with mild-to-moderate COPD. Participants were allocated to two groups using the concealed envelope method. Group A received KT along with conventional physiotherapy, whereas Group B received conventional physiotherapy alone. The intervention was administered over three to five days. The outcome measures included ABG parameters (Potential of Hydrogen (pH), Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and Bicarbonate (HCO3) and SpO2. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and independent t-tests and non-parametric tests, where appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: Significant improvement in SpO2 was observed in the experimental group (p<0.0001). No significant between-group differences were observed in the change scores of ABG parameters. (p>0.05)

Conclusion: KT, as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy, improved SpO2, while no significant treatment-related changes were observed in ABG parameters.

Keywords

Chronic airflow obstruction, Hypoxaemia, Posture, Pulmonary rehabilitation, Respiratory function

COPD is characterised by persistent airflow limitation and impaired gas exchange, and it continues to be a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality (1). In countries such as India, the burden is further influenced by exposure to tobacco smoke, biomass fuels, and environmental pollutants (2).

Beyond pulmonary impairment, individuals with COPD often present with musculoskeletal and postural alterations. Forward shoulder posture and thoracic kyphosis are frequently observed and may negatively influence respiratory mechanics by restricting thoracic expansion and reducing diaphragmatic efficiency (3),(4). These changes can increase dependence on accessory respiratory muscles, thereby raising the work of breathing and reducing ventilatory efficiency. Such alterations in breathing mechanics can affect physiological parameters, including ABG values and SpO2. Hypoxaemia and disturbances in acid-base balance are commonly seen in COPD and are associated with reduced functional capacity and quality of life (5).

Pulmonary rehabilitation plays a key role in COPD management; however, postural correction is often not emphasised as a primary component. Improving thoracic alignment may help optimise respiratory muscle function and contribute to better physical performance in individuals with COPD (6).

The KT is a non invasive intervention designed to facilitate muscle activity, enhance proprioceptive input, and support optimal alignment (7). While it is widely used in musculoskeletal practice, its application in respiratory conditions is still evolving.

Previous studies have reported improvements in pulmonary function, chest expansion, and SpO2 following KT application in individuals with COPD (8),(9),(10). However, these findings are largely based on indirect functional measures such as spirometry and exercise performance. A recent systematic review has also highlighted that evidence regarding the effectiveness of KT in improving pulmonary function in COPD remains limited and inconsistent (11).

The ABG analysis provides a more direct and clinically relevant assessment of oxygenation, ventilation, and acid-base balance. Despite this, there is limited evidence evaluating the effect of KT on ABG parameters in patients with COPD, particularly in short-term clinical settings.

Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of postural correction using KT on ABG parameters and SpO2 in individuals with COPD. We hypothesised that KT, when used as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy, would improve ABG parameters and SpO2 compared with conventional physiotherapy alone. The present study reports a predefined analysis of a larger randomised controlled trial that investigated multiple physiological and functional outcomes in individuals with COPD, with the present analysis focusing specifically on ABG parameters and SpO2.

Material and Methods

The present randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy and Department of Pulmonology, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, from September 2024 to August 2025 in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of SDM College of Physiotherapy, Dharwad (Approval No. SDMIEC/2024/737). The study was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2025/01/079728). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before their inclusion in the study after the purpose and procedures were explained.

A total of 40 individuals aged 40-70 years with a confirmed diagnosis of mild-to-moderate COPD were recruited from the Department of Pulmonology. COPD severity was classified according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria based on post-bronchodilator spirometry (GOLD stages I and II) (1). The diagnosis and severity classification were confirmed by the treating pulmonologist. Participants were recruited based on their eligibility and willingness to participate in the study.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Individuals were included if they were haemodynamically stable, not receiving supplemental oxygen, and able to understand and follow instructions. Participants with a history of recent thoracic or abdominal surgery, fractures involving the ribs or upper limb, neurological disorders, or significant musculoskeletal conditions were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated a priori using G*Power software (version 3.1) (12). An effect size (Cohen’s d=0.8), corresponding to a large effect as described by Cohen (13), was assumed for the sample size calculation. Assuming a statistical power of 80% and a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, the minimum required sample size was estimated to be 30 participants. To compensate for potential dropouts and maintain adequate statistical power, 40 participants were recruited and equally allocated to the experimental (n=20) and control (n=20) groups.

Participants were randomly allocated into either the experimental group or control group using the concealed envelope method. Opaque sealed envelopes containing group assignments were prepared and handled by an independent third party not involved in recruitment, treatment, or assessment. Due to the nature of the intervention, participant and therapist blinding was not feasible. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis were performed by an investigator blinded to group allocation.

Participants were allocated into two groups:

Group A (Experimental Group): Received KT in addition to conventional physiotherapy.
Group B (Control Group): Received conventional physiotherapy alone (Table/Fig 1).

Study Procedure

Conventional physiotherapy protocol: All participants received conventional physiotherapy once daily, consisting of diaphragmatic breathing exercises, segmental breathing exercises, airway clearance techniques including huffing and coughing, and postural drainage. Treatment was administered under the supervision of a physiotherapist and was modified according to individual tolerance and clinical condition.

Kinesio Taping (KT) protoco

Participants in the experimental group received KT. KT was applied with the aim of facilitating postural alignment according to a standardised application protocol described by Kase K et al., and adapted for individuals with COPD. A 5-cm wide elastic Kinesio® Tex Tape was applied by a physiotherapist trained in the standardised KT application technique using a standardised application procedure (14).

For postural correction, I-strips were applied bilaterally over the pectoralis major muscle from its insertion towards its origin with approximately 10-15% tension while the participant maintained an upright posture with gentle shoulder retraction. Additional I-strips were applied over the scapular stabilisers to facilitate scapular retraction and improve thoracic alignment (8),(9),(10),(14).

The anchors were applied without tension, whereas the therapeutic zone was applied with light corrective tension (10-15%) in accordance with standard KT application guidelines (14).

The skin was cleaned and dried before application. Participants were instructed to avoid excessive rubbing of the tape and to report any discomfort or skin irritation. The tape remained in place throughout the intervention period (3-5 days) unless removal was required because of skin irritation or participant discomfort. Tape application was monitored daily for participant comfort, skin integrity, and adherence.

Baseline assessments were performed before initiation of treatment. Post-intervention assessments were conducted after 3-5 days depending on the participant’s duration of hospital stay. All measurements were obtained under similar clinical conditions by the same assessor to maintain consistency. Postural alignment was targeted as part of the intervention; however, posture was not objectively quantified using a standardised assessment tool and therefore was not included as an outcome measure.

Outcome measures:

The following outcome measures were assessed before and after intervention:

• Arterial Blood Gas (ABG): pH, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and bicarbonate concentration (HCO3)
• Oxygen Saturation (SpO2): measured using a calibrated pulse oximeter

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise demographic and clinical characteristics. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Within-group comparisons were performed using paired t-tests, while between-group comparisons were conducted using independent t-tests. Non parametric data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for within-group comparisons and the Mann-Whitney U test for between-group comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

A total of 40 participants were enrolled and equally allocated to the experimental and control groups (20 participants each). All participants completed the study, and none were lost to follow-up, discontinued the intervention, or were excluded from the final analysis.

The participants were between 40 and 70 years of age. Most individuals in the experimental group were aged 61-70 years (55.0%), whereas the largest proportion in the control group belonged to the 51-60 year age category (55.0%). However, the distribution of age was comparable between the groups (χ²=2.559, p=0.278). Likewise, there was no significant difference in sex distribution (χ2=0.902, p=0.342), with females slightly predominating in the experimental group and males in the control group. Smoking status was also similar, as non smokers accounted for 60.0% of the experimental group and 50.0% of the control group (χ2=0.404, p=0.525). Collectively, these findings indicate that the two groups were well matched before the intervention (Table/Fig 2).

As summarised in (Table/Fig 3), the changes in SpO2 and ABG parameters within each group are presented. A significant increase in SpO2 was observed in the experimental group, with a mean improvement of 1.75% (p<0.0001), whereas the control group showed no significant change. The remaining ABG parameters, including pH, PaO2, PaCO2, and HCO3, showed only minor variations that did not reach statistical significance within either group.

As presented in (Table/Fig 4), the comparison of post-intervention physiological outcomes between the two groups is shown. A significantly greater improvement in SpO2 was observed in the experimental group based on the change scores (p<0.0001). No significant differences were identified for arterial pH, PaO2, or PaCO2. Although post-intervention HCO3 levels differed significantly between the groups (p=0.0462), the change scores were not significantly different (p=0.2013). Therefore, this finding should be interpreted cautiously.

The addition of KT to conventional physiotherapy resulted in better improvement in SpO2 compared with conventional physiotherapy alone. Among the outcome measures evaluated, SpO2 demonstrated significantly greater improvement in the experimental group. Although post-intervention HCO3 levels differed between groups, no significant difference was observed in change scores. These observations indicate that KT may enhance oxygenation in individuals with COPD. No significant treatment-related changes were observed in ABG parameters. No intervention-related adverse events were reported during the study.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that individuals with COPD who received KT in addition to conventional physiotherapy experienced improvements in SpO2 and selected ABG parameters over a short intervention period. A significant increase in SpO2 was observed following the intervention. Although post-intervention HCO3 levels differed between groups, this finding should be interpreted cautiously because baseline HCO3 values also differed and the change scores were not statistically significant (8),(9).

The improvement in SpO2 observed in the experimental group may be explained by better thoracic alignment and more efficient recruitment of the respiratory muscles following postural correction. Previous studies have shown that postural abnormalities, including forward shoulder posture and increased thoracic kyphosis, can restrict chest wall expansion, reduce diaphragmatic efficiency, and impair ventilation in individuals with COPD (3),(4). Correcting these biomechanical alterations may therefore contribute to improved breathing mechanics and oxygenation.

Although post-intervention HCO3 levels differed between groups, the groups also differed at baseline and the change scores were not statistically significant. Therefore, the observed HCO3 findings should be interpreted cautiously and cannot be attributed solely to the intervention. COPD is characterised by chronic ventilatory impairment and compensatory changes in ABG parameters. Consequently, longer intervention periods may be necessary before measurable changes in pH or PaCO2 become evident because ABG abnormalities in COPD reflect chronic ventilatory impairment and physiological compensation (1),(5).

The findings of the present study are consistent with previous investigations reporting beneficial effects of KT on respiratory function in individuals with COPD. Baxi G et al., reported improvements in SpO2, chest expansion, and pulmonary function following KT (8). Similarly, Ganesh BR et al., observed improvements in SpO2, pulmonary function, and exercise capacity after thoracic KT (9). In addition, a recent systematic review by de Campos L et al., concluded that although current evidence remains limited, KT may provide adjunctive benefits when incorporated into pulmonary rehabilitation programmes (11).

Unlike many previous studies that primarily assessed spirometric outcomes and functional performance (8),(9),(10),(11), the present study included ABG analysis, providing additional objective information regarding gas exchange and physiological responses to the intervention. This broader assessment contributes to the existing evidence on the potential role of KT as an adjunct to conventional pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals with COPD.

The beneficial effects observed in the present study may be explained by several physiological mechanisms. KT may improve thoracic alignment and posture, thereby facilitating greater chest wall mobility and enhancing lung expansion during breathing (3),(4),(8). In addition, stimulation of the respiratory and postural muscles may improve muscle activation, reduce excessive reliance on accessory muscles of respiration, and promote more efficient diaphragmatic function (6),(7). The continuous sensory input provided by the elastic tape may also enhance proprioception, encouraging maintenance of an optimal thoracic posture throughout the respiratory cycle (14). Taken together, these biomechanical and neuromuscular effects may contribute to improved ventilation, more efficient breathing mechanics, and enhanced oxygenation in individuals with COPD (6),(11).

The present findings highlight the potential value of incorporating postural correction strategies into pulmonary rehabilitation programmes for individuals with COPD. KT is a simple, non invasive, and relatively inexpensive intervention that can be readily integrated into routine physiotherapy practice. The significant improvement in SpO2 observed in the experimental group suggests that KT, when used as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy, may enhance oxygenation in individuals with COPD. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the short intervention period, and further studies are required to establish the long-term clinical benefits and functional impact of this intervention.

Limitation(s)

Several limitations should be considered while interpreting the findings. First, the intervention was administered for only 3-5 days, which may have been insufficient to produce measurable changes in ABG parameters such as PaO2 and PaCO2. Second, the study was conducted at a single centre with a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the results. Although KT was applied for postural correction, objective assessment of postural alignment was not included among the outcome measures. Consequently, it was not possible to establish whether the improvements in respiratory parameters were directly associated with changes in posture. Incorporating validated measures of postural alignment in future studies would help clarify this relationship.

Further research involving larger samples, multicentre settings, and longer intervention periods is recommended to confirm these findings. Inclusion of additional outcome measures, such as pulmonary function tests, chest wall mobility, respiratory muscle performance, exercise capacity, and long-term follow-up assessments, would provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the therapeutic effects of KT in individuals with COPD.

Conclusion

The findings of the present study indicate that adding KT to conventional physiotherapy improved SpO2 following short-term intervention. No significant treatment-related changes were observed in ABG parameters, although post-intervention HCO3 values differed between groups. These results support the potential role of postural correction as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation. Nevertheless, larger well-designed clinical trials with longer follow-up are required to confirm the effectiveness and long-term clinical benefits of this intervention.

Acknowledgement

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Departments of Physiotherapy and Pulmonology, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, for their support and cooperation in facilitating patient recruitment. The authors would also thank the postgraduate physiotherapy students who assisted with data collection and contributed to the smooth conduct of the study.

Authors’ contribution: SP: Participated in data collection, participant recruitment, intervention administration, data curation, preliminary data analysis, manuscript drafting, and revision of the manuscript; SA: Conceived and designed the study, developed the methodology, supervised the research, monitored study conduct, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version; SK: Contributed to statistical analysis and interpretation of data, scientific revision of the manuscript, language editing, preparation of responses to reviewers, and critical intellectual input; PM: Provided methodological guidance, contributed to interpretation of the findings, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version; SA: Assisted with clinical supervision, participant assessment, intervention standardisation, manuscript review, and critical revision of the manuscript; SV: Assisted with participant coordination, data collection, data verification, and manuscript review. All authors contributed substantially to the work, reviewed and approved the final manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in accordance with the ICMJE authorship criteria.

References

1.
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2024 report. Fontana (WI): Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; 2024. Available from: https://goldcopd.org.
2.
Bajpai J, Kant S, Bajaj DK, Pradhan A, Srivastava K, Pandey AK. Clinical, demographic and radiological profile of smoker COPD versus nonsmoker COPD patients at a tertiary care centre in North India. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2364-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Savadatti RR, Gaude GS. Effect of forward shoulder posture on forced vital capacity: A co-relational study. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2011;5(2):119-23.
4.
Cavalcanti AG, Lima CS, de Sá RB, Reinaux CM, Braz Junior DS, Teixeira AL, et al. Influence of posture on the ventilatory pattern and thoracoabdominal kinematics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(7):490-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Prasad B. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Int J Pharm Res Technol. 2020;10(1):67-71.
6.
Xiang X, Huang L, Fang Y, Cai S, Zhang M. Physical activity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A scoping review. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22:301. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Yun HG, Lee JH, Choi IR. Effects of kinesiology taping on shoulder posture and peak torque in junior baseball players with rounded shoulder posture: A pilot study. Life (Basel). 2020;10(8):139. Doi:10.3390/life10080139. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Baxi G, Singh P, Basu S, Khan MU, Palekar T. Immediate effects of Kinesio taping on lung functions, chest expansion and dyspnoea in COPD patients. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2020;14(1):101-05.
9.
Ganesh BR, Praneetha N, Naik V. Comparison of two thoracic kinesio-taping techniques on pulmonary function, oxygen saturation, and exercise capacity in COPD patients: A randomized clinical trial. Indian J Phys Ther Res. 2023; 5:32-6. doi: 10.4103/ijptr.ijptr_168_22. [crossref]
10.
Aboaloyoun LS, Obaya HE, Nassef NL, Bahgat MH. Effect of kinesiotaping on vital capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med J Cairo Univ. 2022;90(9):1479-93. doi:10.21608/mjcu.2022.264605. [crossref]
11.
de Campos L, Neves R, dos Santos Isoppo K. Effects of Kinesio Taping on pulmonary function of individuals with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2023;57:236-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
14.
Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. 3rd ed. Albuquerque (NM): Kinesio Taping Association; 2013.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/90024.24329

Date of Submission: Apr 25, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jun 11, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 28, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 05, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 23, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 25, 2026 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com