Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 13268

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : ZC18 - ZC22 Full Version

In-vitro Assessment of Cytotoxicity, Antioxidant Potential and Anti-inflammatory Activity of a Novel Ginseng Gel Formulation


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87238.24302
Neha Jain, Arvina Rajasekar

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Arvina Rajasekar,
Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai-600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: arvinar.sdc@saveetha.com

Abstract

Introduction: Plant-derived bioactive compounds, particularly Panax ginseng, have attracted considerable interest owing to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective properties relevant to human wellbeing and health. Such phytoconstituents are increasingly explored in medicine for addressing inflammation-associated disease and oxidative stress-related illness. Incorporation of these compounds into biocompatible gel formulations may enhance localised therapeutic efficacy when applied to oral mucosal or periodontal tissues while minimising systemic adverse effects, thereby supporting human wellbeing and broader public health outcomes.

Aim: To formulate a novel ginseng-based gel and evaluate its cytotoxicity, antioxidant potential, and anti-inflammatory activity using standardised in-vitro assays.

Materials and Methods: The present in-vitro experimental study was conducted at the Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, between July 2025 and October 2025. A 2% ginseng gel was prepared using a carbopol-based matrix. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the brine shrimp lethality assay. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assays. Anti-inflammatory activity was determined through Human Red Blood Cell (HRBC) membrane stabilisation and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) protein denaturation assays. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and independent samples t-tests, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results: The ginseng gel demonstrated a concentration-dependent response in the brine shrimp lethality assay (p<0.001); however, mortality values remained within acceptable limits and did not differ significantly from the standard control (p>0.05). Antioxidant activity increased significantly with concentration in both DPPH and FRAP assays (p<0.001), with activity comparable to reference antioxidants (p>0.05). The formulation also exhibited significant, dose-dependent inhibition of protein denaturation and enhanced membrane stabilisation (p<0.001), comparable to diclofenac sodium (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The novel ginseng gel demonstrated acceptable biocompatibility along with significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity under In-vitro conditions, supporting its potential as a localised therapeutic formulation and warranting further in-vivo and clinical evaluation.

Keywords

Free radical scavengers, Oxidative stress, Phytotherapy, Plant extracts

Natural bioactive compounds have gained considerable attention in biomedical research due to their ability to modulate oxidative stress, inflammation, and tissue healing pathways (1),(2). Among these botanicals, Panax ginseng stands out as a well-established medicinal herb traditionally valued for its rejuvenating and therapeutic effects (3). Its major constituents including ginsenosides, polysaccharides, and phenolic compounds are recognised for exhibiting potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective actions, making the plant a promising candidate for localised therapeutic delivery (4).

Inflammation and oxidative damage are central contributors to the pathogenesis of many oral and systemic conditions. Conventional pharmacologic agents used to counter these processes may produce adverse effects or lack sustained action at the target site (5). This has led to the growing interest in developing biocompatible delivery systems capable of improving retention, stability, and bioactivity of natural therapeutics (6),(7). Gel-based formulations, in particular, offer significant advantages due to their hydrophilic nature, ease of intraoral application, patient comfort, and ability to maintain prolonged contact with soft-tissues. Their three-dimensional network structure enables encapsulation of bioactive agents while allowing controlled release, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy (8).

Ginseng-containing gels may provide an effective platform for delivering plant-derived antioxidants and anti-inflammatory molecules directly to affected tissues. By stabilising phytoconstituents and permitting localised delivery, such formulations have the potential to reduce oxidative stress, suppress protein denaturation, and minimise cellular injury (9). Despite the documented benefits of ginseng extracts, limited data exist regarding their incorporation into topical gel matrices and the subsequent evaluation of their cytotoxicity, antioxidant potential, and anti-inflammatory activity under in-vitro conditions.

The present study aimed to formulate a novel ginseng gel preparation and assess its safety and biological activity using standardised in-vitro assays. The study investigates three key parameters: cytotoxicity, antioxidant capacity, and anti-inflammatory effects, comparing the results with established reference standards. The null hypothesis posits that the ginseng gel will not show significant antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activity and may demonstrate cytotoxicity similar to controls. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis proposes that the formulation will exhibit favourable biological properties with minimal cytotoxic effects. This work seeks to provide foundational evidence supporting the potential use of ginseng-based gels as a natural therapeutic modality for localised management of oxidative and inflammatory conditions in clinical applications.

Material and Methods

The present in-vitro study was conducted at the Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, between July and October 2025. All experimental assays were performed in three replicates (n=3) to ensure statistical accuracy and reproducibility of results.The study protocol was approved by Institutional Scientific Review Board (SRB/SDC/PERIO-2403/24/531).

Study Procedure

Materials: Ginseng root powder was procured from Himalayan Nutraceuticals Pvt., Ltd., India. Carbopol 940, Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC), propylene glycol, triethanolamine, potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7), 2,2- DPPH, Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT), acetate buffer, 2,4,6-Tris(2-Pyridyl)-S-Triazine (TPTZ), ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O), BSA were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich®, USA. Diclofenac sodium from T.O. Chemicals Ltd., Thailand was used. All reagents were of analytical grade.

Preparation of Ginseng Extract: Ginseng root powder (250 g) was subjected to ethanolic extraction using the maceration technique (10). The powder was immersed in 1000 mL of ethanol for 48 hours with intermittent stirring. The mixture was then filtered through Whatman filter paper, and the filtrate was evaporated to obtain a concentrated extract. The resulting extract (Table/Fig 1) was stored in airtight container at 4°C until further use (10).

Preparation of Ginseng Gel: A 2% ginseng gel formulation was prepared using a carbopol-based gel matrix. Carbopol 940 was dispersed in purified water containing 0.2% w/v sodium benzoate and allowed to hydrate overnight. Separately, Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) was blended with propylene glycol using a tissue homogeniser to obtain a uniform polymer dispersion. To this, 2 mL of the prepared ginseng extract was incorporated and homogenised thoroughly. The extract-loaded HPMC mixture was then slowly added to the hydrated carbopol dispersion and mixed until a uniform gel base was achieved. Triethanolamine was added dropwise to adjust the pH to 6.0-6.5, facilitating gel formation. The final ginseng gel formulation (Table/Fig 2) was stored at ambient temperature in sterile container until evaluation (10).

Characterisation:

•Cytotoxicity evaluation – brine shrimp lethality bioassay : The cytotoxic potential of the prepared ginseng gel was assessed using the Artemia salina brine shrimp lethality assay, a widely accepted preliminary biocompatibility test (11). Brine shrimp eggs (Aquatic Remedies, Chennai, India) were incubated in artificial seawater prepared by dissolving 40 g/L sea salt and supplemented with 6 mg/L dried yeast to facilitate hatching.

The setup was maintained at 25±2°C with continuous aeration. After 48 hours, actively motile nauplii were harvested using a Pasteur pipette, and groups of ten nauplii were transferred into individual wells of a 24-well plate containing 1 mL of artificial seawater. Ten nauplii per well were used as recommended in standard brine shrimp lethality assay protocols to ensure consistent and reliable mortality assessment (12).

Different concentrations of the ginseng gel (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 μL) were added to the wells, and each concentration was tested in triplicate wells. K2Cr2O7 served as the standard control. Following 24 hours of exposure under static conditions, the number of surviving and dead nauplii was determined using a stereomicroscope (Table/Fig 3). Cytotoxicity was expressed as percentage mortality using the formula (11):

Mortality (%)=(Number of dead nauplii / Total number of nauplii)×100

The mortality percentage was calculated for each well, and the results were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD) of three replicates. In the Artemia salina lethality assay, materials producing 50% or greater mortality are generally considered non biocompatible, whereas lower mortality values indicate acceptable biocompatibility (13).

Antioxidant activity:

•DPPHradical scavenging assay: The free radical scavenging ability of the ginseng gel was determined using the DPPH assay (14). Aliquots of the gel formulation (10-50 μL) were combined with 1 mL of 0.1 mM DPPH solution prepared in methanol and 450 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4). The reaction mixtures were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 minutes. Absorbance values were recorded at 517 nm using a Ultraviolet (UV)-Visible spectrophotometer. BHT served as the standard control. Radical scavenging activity was calculated using the equation (14):

Inhibition (%)={(Absorbance of control - Absorbance of sample)/Absorbance of control}×100

• Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay: The reducing capacity of the formulation was quantified using the FRAP method (14). A working FRAP reagent was prepared by mixing 300 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 10 mM TPTZ solution in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3·6H2O in a 10:1:1 proportion. For each reaction, 3.6 mL of FRAP reagent and 0.4 mL of distilled water were combined, followed by the addition of 80 μL of the ginseng gel. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes, and absorbance was measured at 593 nm.FeSO4·7H2O was used as the standard control to prepare a calibration curve (0.1-1.5 mM). Antioxidant capacity was expressed as Fe²+ equivalents based on the standard curve.

Anti-inflammatory Activity

• Human Red Blood Cell (HRBC) membrane stabilisation test: The anti-inflammatory effect of the ginseng gel was examined by evaluating its ability to stabilise human Red Blood Cells (RBC) membranes exposed to hypotonic stress (15). Blood samples were obtained from healthy adult volunteers after written informed consent. RBCs were isolated by centrifugation, washed thrice with Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS), and adjusted to a 10% v/v suspension. Samples containing 1 mL of the RBC suspension were treated with varying volumes of the gel (10-50 μL) and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. After centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm. Diclofenac sodium functioned as the standard control. Percentage membrane stabilisation was calculated as (15):

Inhibition (%)={(Absorbance of control - Absorbance of sample)/Absorbance of control}×100

• Protein denaturation inhibition - Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) assay: To determine the ability of the formulation to prevent protein denaturation, a BSA assay was performed (15). Different volumes of the ginseng gel (10-50 μL) were added to 2 mL of 1% BSA solution adjusted to pH 6.8. The tubes were incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 20 minutes and then cooled to room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 660 nm. Diclofenac sodium was used as the standard control. Anti-denaturation activity was calculated as (15):

Inhibition (%)={(Absorbance of control - Absorbance of sample)/Absorbance of control}×100

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results were reported as mean±SD. Differences between concentrations were analysed using One-way ANOVA. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare the activity of the ginseng gel with the corresponding standard controls. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Brine Shrimp Lethality (Cytotoxicity) Assay

The cytotoxic activity of the ginseng gel increased progressively with concentration. Mortality values rose from 3.3±5.8% at 10 μL to 10.0±0.0% (20 μL), 16.7±5.8% (30 μL), 26.7±5.8% (40 μL), and 36.7±5.8% at 50 μL. One-way ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences among concentrations (F=19.75, p<0.001), confirming a clear dose-dependent effect (Table/Fig 4). Independent t-test comparison with the standard showed no statistically significant difference at any concentration (p>0.05), indicating comparable cytotoxic performance between the ginseng gel and the standard control (Table/Fig 5).

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

A concentration-dependent increase in free radical scavenging activity was observed for the ginseng gel. DPPH inhibition increased from 24.85±1.53% (10 μL) to 35.72±2.64% (20 μL), 52.96±1.84% (30 μL), 63.45±2.91% (40 μL), and 71.88±1.74% at 50 μL. The increase was statistically significant (F=92.16, p<0.001) (Table/Fig 4). Independent t-tests revealed no significant differences between the gel and the standard (p>0.05), indicating similar antioxidant activity (Table/Fig 5).

FRAP Assay

FRAP values increased steadily with concentration, starting at 0.19±0.01 mM Fe²+ equivalents at 10 μL and rising to 0.31±0.02 (20 μL), 0.47±0.02 (30 μL), 0.59±0.02 (40 μL), and 0.72±0.03 at 50 μL. One-way ANOVA confirmed significant differences among all concentrations (F=104.87, p<0.001) (Table/Fig 4). Independent t-test analysis showed no significant difference compared to the standard at any concentration (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 5).

BSA Assay

The ginseng gel exhibited strong inhibition of protein denaturation in a dose-dependent manner. Values increased from 27.56±1.88% at 10 μL to 46.90±1.51% (20 μL), 62.33±1.48% (30 μL), 69.12±0.52% (40 μL), and 74.80±1.10% at 50 μL. This increase was statistically significant (F=792.30, p<0.001) (Table/Fig 4). Independent t-tests demonstrated no significant difference between the gel and the standard anti-inflammatory drug at any concentration (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 5).

Membrane Stabilisation Assay

Haemolysis inhibition also increased with concentration, from 25.74±0.51% at 10 μL to 42.66±1.78% (20 μL), 57.41±2.02% (30 μL), 67.20±0.83% (40 μL), and 72.05±2.11% at 50 μL. This trend was statistically significant (F=315.92, p<0.001) (Table/Fig 4). Independent t-tests revealed no significant differences from the standard drug (p>0.05), confirming comparable membrane-stabilising activity (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular injury are closely interlinked biological processes that drive the progression of several oral and systemic disorders. Natural compounds such as ginseng have received increasing scientific attention for their ability to modulate these pathways through their rich content of ginsenosides, polyphenols, and polysaccharides. These bioactive molecules have been shown to exert potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions by attenuating free radical generation, stabilising biological membranes, and protecting proteins from structural damage (16). With growing interest in plant-based therapeutics and the need for safe, biocompatible intraoral delivery systems (17),(18), gel formulations incorporating herbal extracts provide an attractive strategy for localised intervention (19),(20). The present study was designed to evaluate a newly formulated ginseng gel for its cytotoxicity, antioxidant behaviour, and anti-inflammatory potential using standardised in-vitro assays.

In the current investigation, the ginseng gel demonstrated minimal cytotoxicity across all tested concentrations in the brine shrimp lethality model, with mortality rates remaining low and statistically comparable to the standard control. This indicates that the formulation is biologically safe within the tested dose range. Antioxidant evaluation through DPPH and FRAP assays showed a clear dose-dependent improvement in free radical scavenging and ferric-reducing capacity, suggesting strong electron-donating and radical-neutralising properties. Similarly, anti-inflammatory performance assessed by HRBC membrane stabilisation and BSA protein denaturation assays revealed substantial protective effects, with inhibition values increasing consistently with concentration. Across all assays, the gel exhibited activity equivalent to their respective reference standards, reinforcing its potential as a multifunctional natural therapeutic agent.

The findings of this study are consistent with existing evidence on the biological efficacy of ginseng-derived compounds. Angeloni S et al., reported that ginsenosides markedly attenuated oxidative stress by reducing Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), suppressing interferon-g, and modulating mitochondrial activity- an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory profile comparable to the redox-scavenging effect observed with our ginseng gel (21). Similarly, Zhang BZ et al., showed that Panax ginseng root extract attenuated Interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1α), Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and Nuclear Factor kappa-B (NF-κB) activation while maintaining greater than 80% cell viability (22). Their results parallel our cytotoxicity data and the high antioxidant activity noted in the FRAP assay.

An MY et al., further reported that black ginseng reduced Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Nitric Oxide (NO), and inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) expression through an inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha-dependent mechanism (23). Although our study did not evaluate endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways, the marked inhibition of protein denaturation suggests that the gel may influence similar upstream inflammatory cascades. Supporting this, Kang M et al., found that ginsenoside lowered intracellular ROS, decreased Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), increased procollagen synthesis, and reduced inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6-effects consistent with the broad antioxidant and anti-inflammatory profile of our formulation (24).

Additionally, Hossen MJ et al., showed that ginsenosides suppressed NO production, inhibited iNOS expression, and blocked NF-κB activation while exhibiting strong radical-scavenging capacity (25). This mirrors the significant anti-inflammatory response recorded in our protein denaturation assay, suggesting that the ginseng gel may act through related signalling pathways.

Overall, the results align well with the broader literature, reinforcing the cytoprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory potential of ginseng-based preparations and supporting the therapeutic relevance of the ginseng gel evaluated in this study. A major strength of the present study is the comprehensive evaluation of the formulation across multiple biologic endpoints, allowing a holistic assessment of safety, antioxidant efficacy, and inflammation suppression. Using simple, reproducible In-vitro assays provide reliable early-phase screening and facilitate comparison with standard reference drugs. The gel-based delivery system also offers translational relevance, particularly for intraoral applications where prolonged therapeutic contact is essential.
From a clinical perspective, the observed antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities suggest that the ginseng gel may serve as a promising adjunctive formulation for localised intraoral applications. Such properties may help mitigate oxidative stress and inflammatory responses associated with periodontal inflammation, mucosal irritation, or post-procedural tissue healing, thereby supporting improved local tissue stability and patient outcomes. Based on the statistically significant concentration-dependent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities observed in the present study, the null hypothesis stating that the ginseng gel would not exhibit significant biological activity was rejected. Furthermore, independent t-test analysis revealed no significant differences between the ginseng gel and the respective standard controls across all evaluated assays, indicating that the formulation demonstrates comparable antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytocompatible properties.

Future research should include in-vivo preclinical evaluation, advanced cell-based assays, and molecular pathway analysis to better understand the mechanistic basis of its effects. Characterisation of ginsenoside profiles, rheological behaviour, and stability studies will additionally help optimise the formulation for clinical translation.

Limitation(s)

In-vitro assays, while informative, cannot fully replicate the complexity of in-vivo tissue interactions, pharmacokinetics, or long-term biocompatibility. The study also did not investigate mechanistic molecular pathways or quantify specific ginsenosides present in the formulation, which would provide deeper insight into the exact contributors to bioactivity. Furthermore, only short-term assessments were performed, leaving the sustained biological effects of the gel unexplored.

Conclusion

The formulated ginseng gel exhibited favourable cytoprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties, with activity comparable to established reference standards under in-vitro conditions. These findings indicate its potential as a natural, localised therapeutic formulation for managing oxidative and inflammatory conditions and warrant further investigation through in-vivo and clinical studies.

References

1.
Dharini S, Pandiar D, Rajeshkumar S, Krishnan RP. Evaluation of anti- inflammatory and antioxidant properties of persea americana and syzygium aromaticum-based herbal mouthwash formulation: An in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2024;18(10):ZF01-ZF05. [crossref]
2.
Krishna KN, Krishnamoorthy K, Veeraraghavan VP, Jayaraman S. Development of anti-inflammatory drug from Crataeva Nurvala: In silico and in-vitro approach. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 2):S1308-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Coleman CI, Hebert JH, Reddy P. The effects of Panax ginseng on quality of life. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2003;28(1):5-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Kang S, Min H. Ginseng, the ‘immunity boost’: The effects of Panax ginseng on immune system. J Ginseng Res. 2012;36(4):354. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Gurevich EV, Gurevich VV. Beyond traditional pharmacology: New tools and approaches. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172(13):3229-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Manohar JH, Rajasekar A. Synthesis and characterization of Omega-3 fatty acid- infused microspheres: An in-vitro exploration of their cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant virtues. Pharmacogn Res. 2025;17(1):244-50. [crossref]
7.
Srinivasan S, Varghese R, Subramanian AK, Kumar SR. Comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles-based herbal oral rinse and commercially available oral rinse: An in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2025;19(7):ZC06-ZC10. [crossref]
8.
Virvescu DI, Luchian I, Cioanca O, Rotundu G, Bida FC, Budala DG, et al. Gel delivery systems in dental medicine: From controlled release to regenerative applications. Gels. 2025;11(11):925. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Liu ZQ. Chemical insights into ginseng as a resource for natural antioxidants. Chem Rev. 2012;112(6):3329-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Ramamurthy J, Jayakumar ND. Anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant effect and cytotoxicity of ocimum sanctum intra oral gel for combating periodontal diseases. Bioinformation. 2020;16(12):1026-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Olmedo DA, Vasquez Y, Morán JA, De León EG, Caballero-George C, Solís PN. Understanding the Artemia salina (brine shrimp) test: Pharmacological significance and global impact. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2024;27(4):545-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Meyer BN, Ferrigni NR, Putnam JE, Jacobsen LB, Nichols DE, McLaughlin JL. Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Med. 1982;45(5):31-34. [crossref]
13.
Valencia-Llano CH, López-Tenorio D, Grande-Tovar CD. Biocompatibility assessment of two commercial bone xenografts by In-vitro and in-vivo methods. Polymers. 2022;14(13):2672. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
da Rosa JS, Stephan MP, Freitas-Silva O, Barboza HT, Gottschalk LM, de Castro IM. Methods for determining In-vitro antioxidant capacity. Peer Review. 2024;6(10):336-50. [crossref]
15.
Sarveswaran R, Jayasuriya WJ, Suresh TS. In-vitro assays to investigate the anti-inflammatory activity of herbal extracts: A review. World J Pharm Res. 2017;6(17):131-41.
16.
Li SL, Zhang S, Fu L, Chen C, Zhang WH, Li W. Chemical structure and beneficial roles of active biomacromolecules from Ginseng: A narrative review. Acupunct Herb Med. 2025;5(3):366-78. [crossref]
17.
Dathan PC, Nallaswamy D, Rajeshkumar S, Joseph S, Ismail S, Rashid N. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of pomegranate peel extract: An in-vitro study. J Clin and Diagn Res. 2024;18(6):ZC01-ZC08. [crossref]
18.
Rukmani PA, Shanmugam R, Manigandan P. Anti-inflammatory effect of herbal mouthwash prepared using Andrographis Paniculata and Rosa formulation. J Pharm Bioallied Sci.2024;16(Suppl 2):S1345-S1349. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sowmya S, Sangavi R. Evaluating the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of nano encapsulated Vitamin A with chitosan gel-in-vitro study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2025;37(2):210-14. [crossref]
20.
Mahalingam M, Pillai DS, Shanmugam RK. Assessment of anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic property of herbal gel containing saffron, Withania Somnifera, dry ginger, and tulsi against recurrent aphthous stomatitis: An in-vitro study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2024;36(3):278-82. [crossref]
21.
Angeloni S, Marinelli O, Aguzzi C, Nabissi M, Bordoni L, Petracci I, et al. Anti- inflammatory and antioxidant activities of ginsenosides and ginseng root extract to counteract obesity. Eur Food Res Technol. 2024;250(1):119-33. [crossref]
22.
Zhang BZ, Yu HY, Tian CF, Yu M, Lee YH, Xiong Z. Panax ginseng root extract exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties by diminishing oxidative stress levels and modulating the NF-κB signaling pathway at both the cellular and tissue levels in the skin. Nat Prod Commun. 2025;20(9):1934578X251364582. [crossref]
23.
An MY, Lee SR, Hwang HJ, Yoon JG, Lee HJ, Cho JA. Antioxidant and anti- inflammatory effects of Korean black ginseng extract through ER stress pathway. Antioxidants. 2021;10(1):62. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Kang M, Park S, Son SR, Noh Y, Jang DS, Lee S. Anti-aging and anti-inflammatory effects of compounds from fresh Panax ginseng roots: A study on TNF-α/IFN- γ-induced skin cell damage. Molecules. 2024;29(22):5479. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Hossen MJ, Hong YD, Baek KS, Yoo S, Hong YH, Kim JH, et al. In-vitro antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects of the compound K-rich fraction BIOGF1K, prepared from Panax ginseng. J Ginseng Res. 2017;41(1):43-51 [crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87238.24302

Date of Submission: Jan 04, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Feb 25, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Apr 16, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 05, 2026
• Manual Googling: Apr 10, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Apr 13, 2026 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com