Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 228575

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : ZC64 - ZC68 Full Version

CBCT Analysis of Maxillary and Sphenoidal Sinuses for Forensic Age and Gender Estimation: A Retrospective Study


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/85630.24372
Amruta J Potekar, Rashmi Venkatesh, Chandramani B More, Deepa J Patil

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 3. Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 4. Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rashmi Venkatesh,
Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Piparia, Waghodia Taluk-391760, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: drrashmivenkatesh@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Age and gender estimation are fundamental in forensic identification, especially in crime investigation, cases of mass disasters and unidentified body remains. Paranasal sinuses, especially maxillary and sphenoidal, are unique, durable, and sexually dimorphic and well-protected within skull, resistant to trauma and decomposition. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) enables precise Three-dimensional (3D) morphometric analysis of these anatomical structures, making them valuable markers for forensic age and gender determination.

Aim: To evaluate the morphological (volumetric) characteristics of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses using CBCT to assess their potential in forensic age and gender estimation.

Materials and Methods: The present Institutional-based retrospective study was conducted between September 2025 to November 2025 on CBCT archives from Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India. CBCT Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files of maxilla/both arches covering maxillary and sphenoidal sinus was selected for analysis. Total CBCT scans of 142 individuals aged 21-75 years were analysed and volumetric measurements of bilateral maxillary and sphenoidal sinus were recorded by semi-automatic segmentation method using 3D Slicer software and statistically analysed to determine correlations with age and gender. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly applied to ensure sample consistency. For statistical analysis Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis tests and Logistic regression analysis were done, p-values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Results: Significant variations in sinus dimensions were observed between different genders and age groups. The median volumes of the maxillary sinus (males: 13,574.75 mm³; females: 11,210.30 mm³) and the sphenoidal sinus (males: 4,918.71 mm³; females: 4,017.23 mm³) were significantly greater in males than in females, with p-values of 0.023 and 0.02, respectively. Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant (p-value <0.05) negative association between age and sinus volume, with advancing age linked to reduced volumes in the bilateral maxillary sinuses and the right sphenoidal sinus.

Conclusion: The CBCT imaging of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses provides valuable morphometric data that can aid in forensic identification. These anatomical structures demonstrate measurable differences across age and gender, supporting their utility as supplementary tools in forensic profiling.

Keywords

Cone beam computed tomography, Image processing, Paranasal sinus, Three-dimensional imaging, Volumetric analysis

The primary focus of forensic radiological evaluation is the osseous skeleton, which plays a vital role in forensic medicine, particularly in anthropometric assessments. Bones commonly utilised for forensic identification such as the pelvis, skull, and long bones are often recovered in fragmented, incomplete, or commingled conditions, especially in mass disaster scenarios like airplane crashes, explosions, armed conflicts, and natural calamities. These circumstances pose significant challenges to both identification and accurate personal identification (1),(2). The craniofacial skeleton exhibits distinct sexual dimorphism and age-related morphological changes, making it a valuable tool in forensic dentistry for identification purposes. With ongoing advancements in diagnostic imaging, traditional two-dimensional radiography is increasingly being supplanted by three-dimensional modalities such as Computed Tomography (CT) and CBCT, offering enhanced accuracy and detail in forensic investigations (3)[,4]. Evaluation of the paranasal sinuses for forensic purposes has proven to be a reliable method. Several studies have indicated that the jaw and skull bones often remain intact, even in cases involving trauma or decomposition, making them valuable structures for identification (5),(6),(7). The paranasal sinuses are air-filled chambers found in the bones that encircle the nasal cavities. The maxillary sinuses, located bilaterally within the maxillary bones, are the largest and earliest to develop among the paranasal sinuses. In contrast, the sphenoid sinuses, deeply embedded within the sphenoid body, benefit from a well-protected anatomical position that offers substantial resistance to externally induced traumatic damage (5),(6),(7).

The CBCT has emerged as a valuable imaging modality in oral and maxillofacial applications, offering three-dimensional visualisation similar to conventional CT but with several distinct advantages. Compared to traditional two-dimensional imaging, CBCT provides enhanced spatial accuracy and depth. Notably, it surpasses conventional CT in terms of lower radiation exposure, cost-effectiveness, wider availability, reduced scanning time, high-resolution output, and ease of image interpretation. CBCT data is stored in the standardised DICOM format, facilitating seamless telecommunication and compatibility with third-party imaging software. This format also allows for selective voxel display within the dataset, enabling precise volumetric visualisation (8).

Many medical image annotation software like Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit (ITK)-SNAP, 3D Slicer,Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System (MIMICS) etc., supports DICOM files and has segmentation tools for 3D volumetric analysis of anatomy and pathology. The 3D Slicer is available for free download and can be used on all platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux) and is completely open source. 3D Slicer software has AI-based automatic segmentation feature and also capable of supporting hundreds of segments per image [9,10]. Previous studies have demonstrated that sexual dimorphism exists in the anthropometric measurements of maxillary sinuses and sphenoidal sinus. However, mostly the measurements like height, width and length of the sinuses are considered. Very few researchers have done the volumetric analysis of the sinuses for forensic evaluation and many of the studies are CT based studies (11),(12),(13),(14),. Therefore, the present study was designed with an aim to evaluate the volumetric morphology of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses using CBCT, with the objective of assessing their potential utility in age and gender estimation.

The null hypothesis (H0) was that there is no significant difference in the volumetric measurements of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses between males and females, or among different age groups, as measured by CBCT. Furthermore, there is no significant correlation between sinus volumes and demographic variables (gender and age).

The alternative hypothesis (H1) was that there is a significant difference in the volumetric measurements of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses between genders and/or among different age groups, as measured by CBCT. Additionally, there exists a significant correlation between sinus volumes and demographic variables (gender and age).

Material and Methods

The present Institutional-based retrospective study was conducted between September 2025 to November 2025 on CBCT archives from Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India. CBCT DICOM files of maxilla/both arches covering maxillary and sphenoidal sinus taken between September 2024 to October 2025 were selected from archives for analysis. The study was approved by Institutional Ethical Committee (SVIEC/ON/DENT/SRP/Sep- 25/20 dated 08/09/2025).

Sample size calculation: Sample size calculation was based on the findings of the study conducted by Sivasamy I et al., (7). In this article the right maxillary sinus volume showed a significant difference between males (mean=16147.98±5684.88 mm³) and females (mean=12973.76±3904.85 mm³), with a mean difference of 3174.22 mm³. Using these values, the pooled standard deviation was calculated as 4870.9 mm³, yielding an effect size (Cohen’s d) of 0.65. Based on a two-sample t-test with a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the minimum required sample size was estimated to be 39 participants per group (approximately 78 in total). However, to enhance the robustness and generalisability of the findings, 142 CBCT scans were included in the study, thereby ensuring higher statistical power and reliability of results.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: CBCT DICOM files of maxillary arch (FOV: 12X5) covering maxillary and sphenoidal sinus of individuals between 21 to 75 years irrespective of gender were included for the study. The images were acquired from CS 9600 CBCT unit with exposure parameters of 120 KVp, 6.3 mA and 20.0 sec exposure time.CBCT files with poor quality image, artifacts and any pathology in maxillary and sphenoidal sinus were excluded.

Study Procedure

Total 320 CBCT scans were screened, verified for complete maxillary and sphenoidal sinus visibility and 142 scans matching the inclusion criteria were selected for further evaluation. The selected scans were exported to 3D Slicer (5.8.1) application for volumetric analysis. 3D Slicer was selected over other open-source software as it supports multidimensional data, allows measurement of areas, distances, angles, and volumetric calculations. Despite its advanced capabilities 3D Slicer has a user friendly interface [9,10]. Bilateral maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses were identified and independently each sinus volumetric analysis was performed using semi-automatic segmentation method.The intraclass correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated excellent inter observer (0.9) reliability for all sinus volume measurements.

The patient’s DICOM dataset was imported into 3D Slicer and processed within the segment editor module. A new segmentation was created, and the paranasal sinus regions were isolated using the thresholding tool, which allowed differentiation of air filled cavities from surrounding osseous and soft-tissue structures. The intensity range was carefully adjusted to exclude cortical bone and mucosal lining, ensuring that only the aerated sinus volume was captured. To refine the segmentation, smoothing filters (such as median or Gaussian smoothing) were applied, which minimised irregular boundaries and enhanced anatomical fidelity.

Following segmentation, the segment statistics module was employed to compute volumetric measurements. This tool automatically calculates the three-dimensional volume of the segmented region, expressed in cubic millimetres, providing reproducible quantitative data. The segmented sinus was then visualised in the 3D rendering view, enabling verification of anatomical accuracy and correction of any segmentation errors. Finally, the volumetric results and 3D models were exported for documentation, statistical analysis, and integration into the research dataset (Table/Fig 1).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Differences in sample size between genders across age groups were tested using the chi-square test. All the parameters were checked for their normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. It was found that all variables were violating normality assumptions and hence further analysis was carried out using “Non-parametric” (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis) tests. Logistic regression analysis was done to check the accuracy of paranasal sinuses for gender determination. Standard deviations and means were used to express the variables. The p-values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Total 142 (n) scans out of the 320 CBCT volumes were selected as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria for 3D volumetric assessment of maxillary and sphenoidal sinus. Out of 142 scans 70 (49.3%) scans were from males and 72 (50.7%) scans were from females. Further the scans were divided in to five sub-groups based on age. The male to female distribution was not significant amongst different age groups (Chi-square value 2.713; p-value 0.607) (Table/Fig 2).

The total median volume of the maxillary was significantly greater in males (13,574.75 mm³) compared to females (11,210.30 mm³), with the difference reaching statistical significance (p=0.023). Sidewise median volumetric measurements in males were found to be 14,640.80 mm³ on the right side and 12,472.50 mm³ on the left. In females, the right maxillary sinus volume measured 11,994.50 mm³, while the left-side measured 10,999.60 mm³. The sphenoidal sinus volume was also greater in males (4,918.71 mm³) than in females (4,017.23 mm³), with the difference being statistically significant. With respect to sphenoidal sinus, sidewise volumetric measurements in males were found to be 5403.22 mm³ on the right-side and 5102.51 mm³ on the left. In females, the right sphenoidal sinus volume measured 3650.32 mm³, while the left side measured 4315.01 mm³. Further analysis revealed that the statistically significant difference in sinus volume between genders was confined to the right side for both the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4).

Gender estimation accuracy was assessed using logistic regression analysis, yielding a combined accuracy of 62% for bilateral maxillary and sphenoidal sinus volumes and the results are detailed in (Table/Fig 5). Age-related changes in sinus volume were statistically evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The mean volumes of both the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses demonstrated a decreasing trend with advancing age. Statistically significant differences were observed in the bilateral maxillary sinuses and the right sphenoidal sinus (Table/Fig 6). Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed a strong negative correlation for both the right and left maxillary sinuses with age, with p-values less than 0.001 (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Paranasal sinuses, as unique anatomical structures, exhibit considerable individual variability that remains relatively preserved even after skeletal decomposition. Consequently, sinus morphometry provides valuable adjunctive information for forensic identification, especially when other skeletal markers are fragmented or unavailable (1),(3),(4). The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses volume using CBCT to assess their potential role in forensic age and gender estimation. In this study, CBCT DICOM images were used for volumetric assessment of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses through segmentation methods in 3D Slicer. Researchers have also employed ITK-SNAP, MIMICS, and other commercial real-time segmentation software for volumetric analysis of various anatomical structures (5),(7),(12).

In the present study, the volumes of both the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses were found to be significantly greater in males than in females, thereby leading to rejection of the null hypothesis.These findings are consistent with those of previous morphometric studies-based on two-dimensional measurements and/or three-dimensional analyses-conducted using various imaging modalities such as lateral cephalograms, CT scans, and CBCT. Sivasamy I et al., conducted a study on a central Indian population, reporting average maxillary sinus volumes of 15,526.65 mm³ in males and 12,980.06 mm³ in females. The sphenoidal sinus volumes were 4,380.22 mm³ in males and 4,054.08 mm³ in females. These measurements closely align with those observed in our study of a western Indian population, reinforcing the utility of both sinuses in forensic sex determination (7). The binary logistic regression accuracy was modest, with an overall correct prediction rate of 62%. Similar accuracy rates were shown in a study conducted by Sivasamy I et al., (7). Research conducted by Vidya CS et al., examined 30 buried skulls of known sex, which were imaged using 3D axial multislice CT scans. Focusing on the maxillary sinuses, the researchers used SyngoVolume (Siemens) software to automatically estimate the bilateral maxillary antral volumes. The study found that the maxillary sinus volume was greater in males compared to females (11). Uthman AT et al., used helical CT for measuring the width, length, height, and total distance across both maxillary sinuses. The authors found that the maxillary sinus height showed sexual dimorphism, with an accuracy rate of 71.6% (15). Similarly, Gibelli D et al., reported mean sphenoid sinus volumes of 10.005±5.101 cm³ in males and 7.920±3.176 cm³ in females in their volumetric assessment study (16). Waluyo RF et al., conducted a study using CBCT images that revealed sexual dimorphism in the two-dimensional parameters of the maxillary sinus (17). Present study revealed the accuracy of gender determination for as 60.6% and 57.7% for right and left maxillary sinus respectively. Sidhu R et al., measured the dimensions of the maxillary sinus using lateral cephalograms, and their Discriminant Function (DF) analysis correctly classified 76% of the original grouped cases, with an overall sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 72% (18). Furthermore, a DF analysis based on the sinus volumes and dimensions achieved a gender prediction accuracy of 69.81% in a study conducted by Sharma SK et al., (19). In contrast, Barros FD et al., did not observe significant differences in maxillary sinus area or volume between sexes (20).

In the present study, adult sinus volumes were categorised based on different age groups. The mean volumes of both the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses showed a significant reduction with advancing age, indicating a negative correlation between age and sinus volume and thereby supporting rejection of the null hypothesis. This feature may be useful in forensic age estimation. Similarly, Ariji Y et al., in their CT-based study, observed that maxillary sinus volume increased up to the age of 20 years, followed by a gradual decline (14). In forensic odontology, paranasal sinus measurements have proven to be reliable indicators for age and gender identification. The findings of the present study demonstrated that CBCT-derived volumetric data can be effectively utilised for the analysis of paranasal sinuses, thereby supporting their application in forensic identification.

Limitation(s)

As the present study was conducted on a population from western India (Gujarat), the findings may not be generalisable to other regions. To develop a comprehensive database for forensic investigations, further research employing a multicentre approach across diverse geographic populations is recommended.

Conclusion

The CBCT of the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses yields critical morphometric data useful for forensic age identification and also has 62% accuracy for gender determination. These anatomical features exhibit quantifiable variations with respect to age and sex and hence it can be used along with other craniofacial parameters in forensic profiling.

References

1.
Rainio J, Lalu K, Ranta H, Penttila A. Radiology in forensic operations. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2001;3(1):34-43. [crossref]
2.
Di Vella G, Campobasso CP, Dragon M, Introna F Jr. Skeletal sex determination by scapular measurements. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1994;70(12):299-305.
3.
Ono I, Ohura T, Narumi E, Kawashima K, Matsuno I, Nakamura S, et al. Three- dimensional analysis of craniofacial bones using three-dimensional computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992;20(2):49-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Deshpande AA, Munde AD, Mishra SS, Kawsankar KD, Sawade RV, Mandar B. Determination of sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography in a rural population of Western Maharashtra: A retrospective cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11:1257-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Cohen O, Warman M, Fried M, Shoffel-Havakuk H, Adi M, Halperin D, et al. Volumetric analysis of the maxillary, sphenoid and frontal sinuses: A comparative computerized tomography-based study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45:96-102. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Sherif NAE-H, Sheta AAE-M, Ibrahim ME, Kaka RAE-M, Henaidy MF. Evaluation of the paranasal sinuses dimensions in sex estimation among a sample of adult Egyptians using multidetector computed tomography. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2017;11:33-39. [crossref]
7.
Sivasamy I, Ramakrishna P, Johaley S, Sikdar SD, Jain SK, Diwan RK. Evaluation of maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses volume and bizygomatic width using cone beam computed tomography: A promising tool for sex determination. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2024;36(3):297-300. [crossref]
8.
Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: Basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Galbusera F, Cina A. Image annotation and curation in radiology: An overview for machine learning practitioners. EurRadiol Exp. 2024;8(1):11. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
3D Slicer [Internet]. Boston (MA): Surgical Planning Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; [cited 2025 Nov 8]. Available from: https://www.slicer.org/.
11.
Vidya CS, Shamasundar NM, Manjunatha B, Raichurkar K. Evaluation of size and volume of maxillary sinus to determine gender by three-dimensional computerized tomography scan method using dry skulls of South Indian origin. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2013;5:97-100.
12.
Aktuna Belgin C, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(5):1493-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Wanzeler AMV, Alves-Junior SM, Ayres L, da Costa Prestes MC, Gomes JT, Tuji FM. Sex estimation using paranasal sinus discriminant analysis: A new approach via cone beam computerized tomography volume analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(6):1977-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: A study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994;23(3):163-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Naaimi AS, Al-Timimi JF. Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination using helical CT scanning. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(2):403-8. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, Oliva AG, Codari M, Termine G, et al. Volumetric assessment of sphenoid sinuses through segmentation on CT scan. SurgRadiol Anat. 2018;40(2):193-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Waluyo RF, Priaminiarti M, Yuniastuti M, Soedarsono N, Susilo BT. Measurements of sex-related differences in maxillary sinus and mandibular canal characteristics using cone beam computed tomography. Forensic Imaging. 2020;21:200371. [crossref]
18.
Sidhu R, Chandra S, Devi P, Taneja N, Sah K, Kaur N. Forensic importance of maxillary sinus in gender determination: A morphometric analysis from Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Eur J Gen Dent. 2014;3(1):53-58. [crossref]
19.
Sharma SK, Jehan M, Kumar A. Measurements of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions by computed tomography scan for gender determination. J Anat Soc India. 2014;63(1):36-42. [crossref]
20.
Barros F, Fernandes CMS, Kuhnen B, Scarso Filho J, Goncalves M, Serra MC. Maxillary sinuses height, width and depth of Brazilian subjects and influence of sex, age, skin color and nutritional status: A CBCT study. Forensic Imaging. 2022;31:200522[crossref].

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/85630.24372

Date of Submission: Nov 29, 2025
Date of Peer Review: Jan 20, 2026
Date of Acceptance: May 20, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 10, 2025
• Manual Googling: May 16, 2026
• iThenticate Software: May 18, 2026 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com