Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 217025

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : ZC96 - ZC101 Full Version

Antibacterial Evaluation of Plectranthus amboinicus-infused Glass Ionomer Cement Against Streptococcus mutans: An In-vitro Study


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87813.24403
Shambavi V Kadam, Vignesh Ravindran

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vignesh Ravindran,
162, Poonamallee High Rd, Velappanchavadi, Chennai-600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: vigneshr.sdc@saveetha.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dental caries remains one of the most prevalent oral diseases worldwide and is strongly associated with Streptococcus mutans, while conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) has limited intrinsic antibacterial activity. Therefore, there is a need to develop modified restorative materials with enhanced antimicrobial properties to reduce bacterial colonisation and improve clinical outcomes.

Aim: The present preliminary in-vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the antibacterial efficacy of Plectranthus amboinicus aqueous extract-modified GIC with that of conventional GIC against Streptococcus mutans using Colony-Forming Unit (CFU) enumeration and crystal violet assay.

Materials and Methods: This preliminary in-vitro study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from December 2025 to January 2026. An aqueous extract of Plectranthus amboinicus was prepared and incorporated into Type II GIC (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to form the test group. At the same time, conventional GIC served as the control group. A total of six cylindrical specimens (5 mm × 2 mm) were fabricated, with three specimens in each group (n=3). Each specimen was incubated with a standardised Streptococcus mutans suspension. Antibacterial activity was evaluated using serial dilution and CFU enumeration. Biofilm biomass was assessed using a crystal violet assay with absorbance measured at 592 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicate for each group. Statistical analysis was carried out using an Independent samples t-test (Welch’s correction), with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: The P. Amboinicus modified GIC demonstrated consistently lower colony counts and optical density values than the control at all tested dilutions, indicating enhanced antibacterial performance. Mean CFU values in the modified group were reduced from 222.33 to 198.00 CFU/mL at 10-6 dilution, from 205.33 to 147.67 CFU/mL at 10-5, and from 143.67 to 95.33 CFU/mL at 10-4, with all differences statistically significant (p<0.001). Similarly, mean OD values decreased from 2.137 in the control to approximately 1.48 in the modified GIC group (p<0.001), reflecting reduced biofilm biomass.

Conclusion: Incorporation of Plectranthus amboinicus aqueous extract into glass ionomer cement significantly enhances its antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans in-vitro. This modification may represent a promising approach to improving the antimicrobial profile of restorative materials and potentially reducing the risk of secondary caries. However, further studies are required to evaluate its physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and long-term clinical performance.

Keywords

Antibacterial activity, Bioactive restorative material, Dental caries prevention, Herbal dental materials

Dental caries remains a prevalent global oral health challenge, affecting individuals of all age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds. The disease is primarily initiated by the colonisation of cariogenic microorganisms, particularly Streptococcus mutans, which adheres to the tooth surface, metabolises fermentable carbohydrates, and produces acids that demineralise enamel (1),(2). The biofilm-forming capacity and acidogenic nature of S. Mutans make it one of the most virulent pathogens responsible for caries initiation and progression (3),(4). Conventional preventive strategies such as fluoride application and mechanical plaque removal have significantly reduced caries prevalence, yet recurrent caries around dental restorations termed “secondary caries” remains a major clinical concern (5).

Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) has long been favoured as a restorative material owing to its excellent adhesion to tooth structure, biocompatibility, and fluoride-releasing ability (6). Despite these advantages, traditional GICs exhibit limited antibacterial efficacy, which may compromise the longevity of restorations, particularly in patients with high caries risk. The incorporation of antimicrobial agents into GIC has been proposed as an effective strategy to enhance its antibacterial potential without impairing mechanical integrity. Various agents such as chlorhexidine, silver nanoparticles, and herbal extracts have been studied, with varying degrees of success (7). In recent years, the search for natural and biocompatible alternatives has driven interest toward phytochemicals derived from medicinal plants, which offer broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity with minimal cytotoxicity (8),(9).

Among these plants, Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng., commonly known as Indian borage or Cuban oregano, has garnered significant attention for its potent antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. This aromatic perennial herb, belonging to the Lamiaceae family, is rich in secondary metabolites such as carvacrol, thymol, eugenol, and rosmarinic acid compounds well documented for their inhibitory effects on pathogenic bacteria (10),(11). Several in-vitro studies have demonstrated that P. Amboinicus extracts exhibit notable antibacterial activity against oral pathogens including S. Mutans, S. Sobrinus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus (12),(13),(14). The mechanism of action is believed to involve disruption of bacterial cell membranes, interference with enzymatic systems, and inhibition of glucosyltransferase activity, thereby reducing biofilm formation and acid production (14).

Herbal-modified dental materials represent an emerging area within restorative dentistry, aligning with the growing interest in biologically derived and sustainable therapeutic approaches. When incorporated into restorative matrices such as GIC, plant-derived bioactive compounds may enhance antibacterial properties and influence interactions at the material-tissue interface (9). The incorporation of Plectranthus amboinicus extract into GIC is hypothesised to provide antimicrobial effects that could potentially reduce bacterial colonisation at restoration margins. Additionally, the polyphenolic constituents of P. amboinicus possess antioxidant properties, which may contribute to the biological behaviour of the modified material. However, these effects require further investigation through detailed in-vitro and in vivo studies.

Furthermore, the global rise in antibiotic resistance underscores the necessity of identifying novel antimicrobial agents from natural sources (World Health Organisation, 2023). Phytochemicals with broad-spectrum activity and low propensity for inducing resistance could play a pivotal role in preventive dentistry and restorative biomaterials. Studies have reported synergistic effects between plant essential oils and conventional restorative materials, enhancing both antibacterial and physicochemical properties (14),(15). For instance, integration of Ocimum sanctum and Azadirachta indica extracts into GIC formulations demonstrated promising inhibitory effects on S. mutans growth while maintaining acceptable compressive strength (8),(16). However, there remains a paucity of data specifically examining the impact of P. amboinicus-infused GIC against S. mutans.

The potential of P. amboinicus in dental applications extends beyond antibacterial efficacy. Its bioactive terpenoids and phenolic acids have been associated with anti-inflammatory and wound healing properties, which could facilitate pulp and dentin repair when used in restorative procedures (10). These pharmacological attributes, coupled with the plant’s abundance and low toxicity, make it a compelling candidate for incorporation into dental cements.

The present preliminary in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of Plectranthus amboinicus aqueous extract-modified GIC against Streptococcus mutans. The objective was to compare the antibacterial activity of the modified GIC with that of conventional GIC using CFU enumeration and crystal violet assay.

The null hypothesis (H0) stated that there would be no significant difference in antibacterial efficacy between Plectranthus amboinicus-modified GIC and conventional GIC.

The alternative hypothesis (H1) proposed that the modified GIC would demonstrate significantly greater antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans.

Material and Methods

This preliminary in-vitro experimental study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from December 2025 to January 2026. The study was designed to evaluate and compare the antibacterial efficacy of Plectranthus amboinicus-modified GIC with that of conventional GIC against Streptococcus mutans. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Scientific Review Board (SRB), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, India (Approval No.: SRB/SDC/PEDO-2403/25/451). As the present study was conducted in-vitro and did not involve human participants or animal subjects, formal ethical clearance was not mandatory; however, Institutional approval was obtained before the commencement of the study.

Sample size: A total of six specimens were included in the study, with three specimens in each group (n=3 per group). As this was a preliminary in-vitro study, a sample size of three specimens per group was considered adequate to obtain preliminary data, consistent with similar in-vitro studies evaluating antibacterial properties of modified GICs (5).

Study Procedure

1. Preparation of Plectranthus amboinicus extract: Fresh leaves of Plectranthus amboinicus were collected from healthy, pesticide-free plants and thoroughly washed under running tap water, followed by rinsing with sterile distilled water. The leaves were blotted dry and weighed using a digital balance, and approximately 10 g of fresh leaves were used for extraction. The weighed leaves were added to 500 mL of distilled water in a sterile borosilicate vessel and subjected to decoction by boiling, followed by gentle simmering for 10-15 minutes to facilitate the release of water-soluble phytoconstituents, which is a commonly accepted method for aqueous herbal extraction.

After heating, the mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and filtered through multiple layers of sterile muslin cloth, followed by Whatman No. 1 filter paper to obtain a clear aqueous extract. The filtrate was collected in sterile, airtight glass containers, and the final volume obtained after filtration was approximately 470-480 mL, accounting for minor evaporation losses during the decoction process, ensuring consistency. The extract was stored at 4°C and used within 48 hours of preparation to minimise degradation of active constituents. No preservatives were added.

The final volume: The prepared aqueous extract corresponded to an approximate concentration of 2% w/v (fresh weight basis) and was used as the modifying agent for incorporation into GIC. The extract concentration was standardised based on the ratio of plant material to solvent during preparation (15) (Table/Fig 1).

No phytochemical characterisation (such as quantification of phenols, flavonoids, or specific bioactive compounds), physicochemical evaluation of the modified material, or sterility testing of the extract was performed in the present preliminary study, which is acknowledged as a limitation. Further studies are required to evaluate these parameters.

2. Preparation of GIC specimens: Type II GIC (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used in the study. The control group specimens were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the standard powder-to-liquid ratio of 1 scoop powder to 1 drop liquid.

For the test group, the aqueous extract of Plectranthus amboinicus was incorporated by replacing 50% of the liquid component of the GIC with the prepared extract in a 1:1 ratio (volume-to-volume basis). The modified liquid was then mixed with the GIC powder using the manufacturer-recommended powder-to-liquid ratio to maintain acceptable consistency and handling characteristics. The powder and modified liquid were mixed using an agate spatula for approximately 30-45 seconds to obtain a homogeneous paste.

The replacement of 50% of the GIC liquid with the aqueous extract may have influenced the acid-base setting reaction, pH, and physicochemical behaviour of the material. These parameters were not evaluated in the present preliminary study; therefore, the antibacterial findings should be interpreted cautiously.

The mixed material was immediately transferred into pre-sterilised cylindrical stainless steel moulds measuring 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness. A minimal amount of sterile petroleum jelly was applied to the inner surfaces of the moulds as a separating medium to facilitate easy removal of the set specimens. Care was taken to ensure that only a thin layer was used to avoid any potential interference with the experimental outcomes (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

The specimens were allowed to set under aseptic conditions at room temperature. Following complete setting, the specimens were carefully removed from the moulds and stored in a desiccator until further testing to prevent moisture contamination.

• Group I - Conventional GIC (Control group)

• Group II - Plectranthus amboinicus-modified GIC (Test group)

3. Bacterial strain and inoculum preparation: The antibacterial activity was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175), a standard reference strain widely recognised for its cariogenic potential. The bacterial strain was obtained from the institutional microbiology laboratory. The organism was cultured on Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours to obtain fresh, isolated colonies. A standardised bacterial suspension was prepared by transferring selected colonies into sterile saline solution and adjusting the turbidity to match the 0.5 McFarland standard, corresponding to approximately 1.5×108 CFU/mL. This standardised inoculum ensured reproducibility and uniform bacterial concentration across all experimental procedures (Table/Fig 4).

4. Antibacterial testing procedures:

a. Serial dilution and CFU enumeration: The antibacterial effect of the GIC specimens was evaluated using three independent specimens per group (n=3). Each specimen was incubated with 1 mL of standardised Streptococcus mutans suspension (0.5 McFarland standard Ëœ1.5×108 CFU/mL) in 9 mL of sterile saline, resulting in a total volume of 10 mL. The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours.

Following incubation, serial tenfold dilutions (10-1 to 10-6) were prepared to obtain countable bacterial colonies. Aliquots from the selected dilutions were plated on Brain Heart Infusion agar and incubated under standard conditions (at 37°C for 48 hours). Colony counts from the plated dilutions were recorded using a digital colony counter and compared between the study groups. The CFU/mL was calculated using the formula:

CFU/mL=(Number of colonies × dilution factor)/volume plated (mL)

However, CFU/mL calculations were not used as the primary outcome measure in the present preliminary study; only raw mean colony counts obtained from plated aliquots were used for statistical analysis.

All measurements were performed for each specimen, and mean CFU values were calculated for each group (17) (Table/Fig 5).

b. Crystal violet assay for biofilm mass: Following incubation with the GIC specimens, the bacterial suspensions were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The resulting pellets were washed twice with sterile Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS; pH 7.4) to remove residual medium. The pellets were then fixed with methanol for 10 minutes and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 minutes.

Excess stain was removed by rinsing with PBS, and the bound dye was solubilised using 33% glacial acetic acid. Absorbance was measured at 592 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The crystal violet assay was used to assess the biomass of adherent biofilm-forming bacterial cells attached to the surface. Lower absorbance values indicated reduced adherent biofilm biomass in the presence of the modified GIC. The assay was not used to directly distinguish viable from non viable bacterial cells. In this assay, cells attached to the surface of the culture plate retain the crystal violet dye, whereas dead or non adherent cells are removed during the washing steps and therefore do not contribute to the final staining signal. Consequently, the assay evaluates total adherent biofilm biomass based on the amount of crystal violet dye retained by adherent cells.

The serial dilution procedure was performed specifically for colony count enumeration to obtain countable bacterial colonies. In contrast, the crystal violet assay was used as an overall assessment of biofilm biomass following incubation with the respective GIC specimens and was not intended to represent dilution-dependent measurements.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

All quantitative data (colony counts and optical density values) were expressed as Mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Intergroup comparisons between conventional GIC (control) and modified GIC (test) were performed using an Independent samples t-test with Welch’s correction. Serial dilutions were performed as part of the standard microbiological procedure to obtain countable CFU and were not considered independent experimental groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Given the exploratory nature of this preliminary study, adjustments for multiple comparisons were not applied, and findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Results

Colony Count Results

Descriptive analysis of colony count data demonstrated consistently lower Streptococcus mutans counts in the modified GIC group compared to the control group. Serial dilutions were performed to obtain countable colonies, and the values presented represent mean colony counts obtained from plated aliquots at the respective dilution levels (Table/Fig 6).

Independent samples t-tests demonstrated statistically significant differences in colony counts between group I and group II under the present experimental conditions. At 10-6, 10-5, and 10-4 dilutions, t-values were 23.085, 61.165, and 51.265, respectively, with two-sided p-values <0.001 for each comparison (Table/Fig 7). These findings indicate lower recoverable colony counts in group II compared to group I; however, they should be interpreted cautiously due to the preliminary study design and small sample size.

Optical Density (OD) Values - Crystal Violet Assay

Optical density measurements obtained from the crystal violet assay demonstrated lower overall biofilm biomass measurements in the modified GIC group compared to the control group under the present experimental conditions (Table/Fig 8).

Intergroup differences in optical density measurement demonstrated statistically significant differences under the present experimental conditions. Mean OD differences (approximately 0.66 units) had very narrow 95% confidence intervals, indicating reduced biofilm biomass in group II compared to group I (Table/Fig 9).

However, the unusually high t-values observed in the present study should be interpreted cautiously, as the low within-group variability likely reflects the uniformity of triplicate measurements obtained under controlled in-vitro experimental conditions rather than true biological variability.

Discussion

The present preliminary in-vitro study evaluated the antibacterial performance of Plectranthus amboinicus-modified GIC against Streptococcus mutans, a key pathogen associated with dental caries. The modified GIC demonstrated consistently lower colony counts and reduced optical density values compared to the conventional material, indicating a measurable reduction in bacterial growth and biofilm formation under experimental conditions. These findings suggest that incorporation of plant-derived extracts may enhance the antibacterial properties of restorative materials. However, the extent of reduction observed in this study should be interpreted with caution, as the clinical significance of these findings cannot be directly inferred from in-vitro data alone (9),(16).

Although previous studies have attributed the antimicrobial activity of Plectranthus amboinicus to various bioactive constituents, the present study did not include phytochemical analysis or evaluation of the stability of these compounds within the GIC matrix. Therefore, the exact mechanism underlying the observed antibacterial effect warrants further investigation (9),(13),(14),(18).

The findings of the present study are in agreement with previous reports demonstrating the antimicrobial potential of Plectranthus amboinicus against oral microorganisms (14). Earlier studies have reported that both aqueous and essential oil extracts of this plant exhibit antibacterial activity, which has been attributed to the presence of various bioactive compounds (14),(16),(19). These compounds have been suggested to exert antimicrobial effects through mechanisms such as disruption of bacterial cell membranes, alteration of membrane permeability, and interference with enzymatic systems involved in biofilm formation. However, such mechanisms were not directly evaluated in the present study. The observed reduction in colony counts and biofilm biomass in this study indicates an overall antibacterial effect of the modified GIC under the present experimental conditions; however, the exact mechanism underlying this effect requires further investigation. In addition, the crystal violet assay used in the present study reflects total biofilm biomass and does not differentiate between viable and non viable bacterial cells.

Similar findings have been reported in studies evaluating plant-based modifications of restorative materials, where incorporation of herbal extracts such as Ocimum sanctum, Azadirachta indica, and Salvadora persica into GIC has demonstrated enhanced antibacterial properties against cariogenic microorganisms (15),(16),(17),(18). Previous investigations have suggested that plant-derived additives may improve the antimicrobial profile of GIC while maintaining acceptable handling characteristics, particularly when used in controlled concentrations. Systematic reviews have also highlighted the potential of phytochemical incorporation as an emerging strategy for developing bioactive restorative materials; however, variations in extract type, concentration, and methodology across studies limit direct comparison of outcomes (20). The performance of the P. amboinicus modified GIC in this study is consistent with those observations, demonstrating a pattern of bacterial inhibition comparable to that reported for other herbal and bioactive restorative systems. Therefore, while the present findings are consistent with existing literature, further standardised studies are required to evaluate the effects of such modifications on both antimicrobial efficacy and material properties.

The present results can also be viewed within the broader context of bioactive and antibacterial restorative materials, which include calcium silicate based cements, bioactive glass containing composites, and nanoparticle functionalised resins (21),(22). These materials typically act through ion release, pH elevation, or surface modifications that hinder bacterial colonisation, but some pose concerns related to cytotoxicity, cost, or aesthetic alteration. In contrast, the use of a plant-derived aqueous extract such as P. amboinicus offers a more natural and potentially safer alternative, with the present data indicating substantial antibacterial benefit and no observable adverse effect on the basic handling of the GIC in-vitro (11).

Within the limitations of this preliminary in-vitro study, the observed reduction in colony counts and biofilm biomass suggests that incorporation of Plectranthus amboinicus extract may contribute to the antibacterial activity of the modified GIC. GIC is known for its hydrophilic nature and ion exchange properties, which may influence the distribution of incorporated agents within the matrix. However, the impact of extract incorporation on the material’s physicochemical and mechanical properties was not assessed in this study and requires further investigation (23).

This modification may offer a potential approach to reducing bacterial colonisation at restoration margins and lowering the risk of secondary caries under in-vitro conditions; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research is required to standardise extract preparation through phytochemical characterisation and to evaluate the release kinetics of active constituents from the modified GIC. In addition, studies involving multispecies biofilm models, long-term antibacterial assessment, and in-vivo or ex-vivo conditions are necessary to better establish clinical applicability. Comprehensive evaluation of physicochemical properties, fluoride release, mechanical strength, and cytocompatibility with oral tissues is also essential prior to clinical translation. Based on the findings of the present study, the null hypothesis was rejected, as the modified GIC demonstrated significantly greater antibacterial activity compared to conventional GIC.

Limitation(s)

The present pilot in-vitro study has several limitations that must be considered while interpreting the findings. The study was conducted using a single bacterial species under controlled laboratory conditions, which does not replicate the complexity of multispecies oral biofilms, salivary interactions, pH fluctuations, and mechanical stresses present in the oral environment. The extract preparation was not subjected to phytochemical characterisation, and the concentration of active constituents was not quantified, which may affect reproducibility. Additionally, sterility testing of the extract and evaluation of its stability during incorporation into the GIC matrix were not performed. The sample size was limited, and although triplicate specimens were used, the low variability observed may reflect controlled experimental conditions rather than true biological variation. Furthermore, adjustments for multiple comparisons were not applied, which may increase the risk of Type I error. Therefore, the statistical findings should be interpreted cautiously and regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. The study also did not assess the physicochemical properties, fluoride release, pH changes, setting characteristics, or mechanical performance of the modified material.

Despite these limitations, the present findings contribute to the growing body of research exploring plant-derived modifications of restorative materials. The observed reduction in Streptococcus mutans counts and biofilm biomass suggests a potential antibacterial effect of Plectranthus amboinicus modified GIC under in-vitro conditions.

However, the present study findings should be interpreted with caution, and further well-designed studies are required to establish the clinical relevance and material performance of such modifications.

Conclusion

Plectranthus amboinicus-modified GIC demonstrated lower Streptococcus mutans colony counts and reduced adherent biofilm biomass measurements compared with conventional GIC under the conditions of this preliminary in-vitro study. These findings suggest a potential antibacterial effect of the plant extract when incorporated into GIC. Further studies with larger sample sizes, comprehensive physicochemical characterisation, and biological validation are required to confirm these findings and evaluate the clinical applicability of the modified material.

References

1.
Marsh PD. In sickness and in health-what does the oral microbiome mean to us? An ecological perspective. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29(1):60-65. Doi: 10.1177/0022034517735295. PMID: 29355410.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Radhamanalan G, Dharumadurai D. Isolation, identification, and molecular characterization of Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis from dental caries. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2026;115:117392. Doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2026.117392.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Caufield PW, Li Y, Dasanayake A. Dental caries: An infectious and transmissible disease. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005;26(5 Suppl 1):10-16. PMID: 17036539.
4.
Radhamanalan G. Postbiotics and phage synergy in precision oral microbiome engineering: Systems biology strategies targeting Streptococcus mutans in dental caries. Front Mol Biosci. 2026;13:1766853. Doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2026.1766853.[crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Askar H, Krois J, Göstemeyer G, Bottenberg P, Zero D, Banerjee A, Schwendicke F. Secondary caries: What is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed? Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1869-1879. Doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03268-7.[crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):16. Doi: 10.3390/jfb7030016.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro A, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater. 2006;22(7):647-652. Doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.08.003.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Singer L, Bourauel C. Herbalism and glass-based materials in dentistry: Review of the current state of the art. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2023;34(11):60. Doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06764-w.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Chiode MMM, Colonello GP, Kabadayan F, Silva JS, Suffredini IB, Saraceni CHC. Plant extract incorporated into glass ionomer cement as a photosensitizing agent for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on Streptococcus mutans. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;38:102788. Doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102788. PMID: 35235837.[crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Filipe M, Bangay G, Brauning F, Ogungbemiro F, Palma B, Díaz-Lanza AM, Hassan A, Esperança André R, Rijo P. Plectranthus amboinicus: A systematic review of traditional uses, phytochemical properties, and therapeutic applications. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025;18(5):707. Doi: 10.3390/ph18050707.[crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Arumugam G, Swamy MK, Sinniah UR. Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng: Botanical, phytochemical, pharmacological and nutritional significance. Molecules. 2016;21(4):369. Doi: 10.3390/molecules21040369.[crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Krishnamachari H, Janani K, Teja K, Chandrasekar CM, Sukumar M. Formulation and evaluation of oral disintegrating films using a natural ingredient against Streptococcus mutans. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25(2):128-132. Doi: 10.4103/jcd. jcd_143_21.[crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Ashour AA, Basha S, Felemban NH, et al. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Glass Ionomer Cement in Incorporation with Biogenic Capped Silver-Nanobiotic, Chlorhexidine Diacetate and Lyophilized Miswak. Molecules; 27. Epub ahead of print 14 January 2022. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27020528.[crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Nazliniwaty N, Laila L. Formulation and antibacterial activity of Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng leaves ethanolic extract as herbal mouthwash against halitosis-causing bacteria. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(22):3900-03. Doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.529. PMID: 32128001; PMCID: PMC7048360.[crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Pai KR, Pallavi LK, Bhat SS, Hegde SK. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of aqueous extract of Ocimum sanctum “queen of herb” on dental caries microorganisms: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 2):S176-S179. Doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2147. PMID: 35645522; PMCID: PMC9108857.[crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Neelima B, Reddy JS, Singh PT, Suhasini K, Hemachandrika I, Hasanuddin S. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of glass ionomer cement added with propolis, chitosan, and chlorhexidine against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020;38(4):367-73. Doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_322_20. PMID: 33402619.[crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Martini KM, Boddu SS, Nemenman I, Vega NM. Maximum likelihood estimators for colony-forming units. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(9):e0394623. Doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03946-23. Epub 2024 Jul 23. PMID: 39041814; PMCID: PMC11371269.[crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Revathi N, Sankarganesh M, Raja D, Rajakanna J, Senthilkumar O. Green synthesis of Plectranthus amboinicus leaf extract incorporated fine-tuned manganese dioxide nanoparticles: Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Inorg Chem Commun. 2023;154:110935. Doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110935.[crossref]
19.
Khwaza V, Aderibigbe B. Antibacterial activity of selected essential oil components and their derivatives: A review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025;14(1):68. Doi: 10.3390/ antibiotics14010068.[crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Carvalho ILD, Borges MHN, Sampaio GAM, de Melo Monteiro GQ, Costa MJF, Lima B, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Sette-de-Souza PH. Improving glass ionomer performance through plant extracts: A systematic review of in vitro studies. Biomater Investig Dent. 2025;12:45152. Doi: 10.2340/biid.v12.45152. PMID: 41487465; PMCID: PMC12757969.[crossref]
21.
Melo MAS, Garcia IM, Mokeem L, Weir MD, Xu HHK, Montoya C, Orrego S. Developing Bioactive Dental Resins for Restorative Dentistry. J Dent Res. 2023;102(11):1180-1190. Doi: 10.1177/00220345231182357. Epub 2023 Aug 9. PMID: 37555431; PMCID: PMC11066520.[crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Najiya VP, Varghese RM, Kumawat S, Sharma C, Mounika G, Rawat M. A retrospective analysis of resin-based polymer composites and bioactive glass-polymer hybrids regarding secondary caries and durability. J Polym Compos. 2026;14(1):1089-95. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/ article=2026/view=236716
23.
Gomes FS, Campos-Ferreira PV, Macedo RFC, Costa-Oliveira BE, Bauer J. Glass ionomer cement particles pre-reacted with chlorhexidine: Physical/ chemical properties and antimicrobial activity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;158:106678. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106678. PMID: 39096683.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87813.24403

Date of Submission: Jan 29, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Mar 24, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 15, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 11, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 11, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 13, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com