Quality of Basic Life Support – A Comparison between Medical Students and Paramedics
Published: July 1, 2016 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/.8197
Maria Isabel Körber, Thomas Köhler, Verena WeiSS, Roman Pfister, Guido Michels
1. Department III of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Heart Center, Germany.
2. Department III of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Heart Center, Germany.
3. Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
4. Department III of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Heart Center, Germany.
5. Department III of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Heart Center, Germany.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Maria Isabel Körber,
Kerpenerstr. 62, 50936 Köln.
E-mail: maria.koerber@uk-koeln.de
Abstract
Introduction: Poor survival rates after cardiac arrest can partly be explained by poor basic life support skills in medical professionals.
Aim: This study aimed to assess quality of basic life support in medical students and paramedics.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with 100 early medical students (group A), 100 late medical students (group B) and 100 paramedics (group C), performing a 20-minute basic life support simulation in teams of two. Average frequency and absolute number of chest compressions per minute (mean (±SD)), chest decompression (millimetres of compression remaining, mean (±SD)), hands-off-time (seconds/minute, mean (±SD)), frequency of switching positions between ventilation and chest compression (per 20 minutes) and rate of sufficient compressions (depth =50mm) were assessed as quality parameters of CPR.
Results: In groups A, B and C the rates of sufficiently deep chest compressions were 56%, 42% and 52%, respectively, without significant differences. Male gender and real-life CPR experience were significantly associated with deeper chest compression. Frequency and number of chest compressions were within recommended goals in at least 96% of all groups. Remaining chest compressions were 6 mm (±2), 6 mm (±2) and 5 mm (±2) with a significant difference between group A and C (p=0.017). Hands-off times were 6s/min (±1), 5s/min (±1) and 4s/min (±1), which was significantly different across all three groups.
Conclusion: Overall, paramedics tended to show better quality of CPR compared to medical students. Though, chest compression depth as an important quality characteristic of CPR was insufficient in almost 50% of participants, even in well trained paramedics. Therefore, we suggest that an effort should be made to find better ways to educate health care professionals in BLS.
Keywords
Emergency medicine, Education, Resuscitation training, Resuscitation