![](images/Newspaper.gif)
“Why We Say No! A Look Through the Editor´s Eye”
JB01-JB05
Correspondence
Dr. Hemant Jain,
Editor-in-Chief, 1/9 Roop Nagar, Below Punjab National Bank, GT Road, Delhi-110007, India.
E-mail: drhemantjain@jcdr.net
Background: The rapidly flourishing health science has provided a ground to perform research work and contribute to the field of science. On the other hand, reporting the research is equally important as carrying out research. Many such researches and their ground breaking work remain unreported or do not reach the guild, because of poor drafting skills. In nine years since Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) inception, editorial have come across many manuscripts which are clinically and socially relevant in their message, but lack legible drafting. It was felt that an objective analysis of the reasons for rejection, of manuscripts, is required.
Aim: The present study was conducted with the aim to determine the reasons for rejection of medical and dental manuscript submitted in JCDR.
Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutive medical and dental articles submitted to JCDR since 1st August 2014 was done. Only those articles (902) that reached the end point on decision were considered. The reasons of rejection for medical and dental articles were enlisted and analyzed. When there were multiple reasons of rejection and all of them were critical, then they were counted in all the categories.
Results: Out of the 902 consecutive articles 522 articles underwent rejection. Among the rejected ones, dental specialty comprised of 43.5% and medical articles contributed 56.5%. The most frequent reasons for rejection were commonality (44.6%), non compliance by authors (17.8%), methodological issues (17.3%), plagiarism (11.1%), received same topic and published (7.66%), poor draft (6.70%), data inconsistency (5.77%), mismanagement (1.72%), blacklisted author (1.14%), ethical and out of scope were 0.57% each.
Conclusion: Based on our findings, it can be concluded that manuscript rejection can be avoided by the authors, if the topic is well choosen and communication is maintained with the journal editorial.