
Evolving Paradigms in Gynaecological Practices: From Clinical Judgment to Technological Precision
QL01-QL02
Correspondence
Ms. Madhura Deshmukh,
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: madhura.deshmukh@dpu.edu.in
Dear Editor,
Over the past few decades, the landscape of gynaecological practice has changed significantly, reflecting advances in medical technology, societal views, and patient demographics (1). Historically, gynaecology largely relied on subjective evaluations and clinical judgment. With limited means of investigations, diagnoses and treatments were frequently made only on the basis of personal experience and physical examinations. In contrast, advances in technology are driving gynaecological practice today.
Modern diagnostic tools such as high-resolution ultrasound (for assessing ovulatory disorders, structural anomalies, endometrial conditions, ovarian reserve, and other contributing factors), advanced hormonal assays (for in-vitro fertilisation, implantation, and growth of embryos), and genetic testing (for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of inherited disorders) (2),(3),(4) have shifted the focus from subjective judgments to objective data. This shift has enabled the early detection of conditions such as obesity, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), menstrual disorders, hypothyroidism, and genital herpes, which are now prevalent in the gynaecological setting (5). Recent advancements in gynaecologic surgery, including robotic-assisted techniques for hysterectomies, myomectomies, pelvic support procedures, and reproductive surgeries, alongside the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in foetal cardiotocography, ultrasonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for improved diagnostics in obstetrics, have caused a monumental shift in the way gynaecologic procedures are performed. These innovations have shifted surgical practices toward minimally invasive techniques, reducing the need for open surgeries and enhancing precision and outcomes (6). While these technologies have improved early detection and treatment, they have also increased the need for investigative data, often at the expense of developing clinical expertise.
The demographics of gynaecological patients have also changed dramatically. In the past, infertility problems were uncommon in gynaecological Outpatient Departments (OPDs). In contrast, modern OPDs receive a wider range of patients; fewer of them are pregnant, and a sizable percentage are seeking infertility treatments (7),(8).
Early registrations for Antenatal Care (ANC) were once rare, with many patients only seeking care in the later stages of pregnancy due to ignorance or social taboos. Today, pre-conception visits and counselling sessions (to reduce the risk of poor maternal, foetal, and obstetric outcomes) are standard practices, reflecting a more proactive approach to reproductive health. One notable shift is in the perception and management of Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP). Once a taboo subject, with MTP wards being discreetly hidden, the practice is now widely accepted due to changing societal norms, including the rise of modern relationships and evolving cultural attitudes. Although the preference for a ‘female’ gynaecologist was mostly seen in younger women, nowadays, education levels have been shown to impact the gender of a gynaecologist (9).
In conclusion, the evolution of gynaecological practice from a subjective to an objective, technology-driven approach reflects significant advancements in medical science and shifts in societal attitudes. While these changes have undoubtedly improved patient care and outcomes, they also highlight the need for a balanced approach that integrates clinical expertise with technological innovation.