Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 182911

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : RE01 - RE06 Full Version

Narrative Review on Osteoporosis: A Silent Killer


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69058.19248
Shrihari L Kulkarni, Harpreet Kour

1. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, SDM Medical College and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharward, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Harpreet Kour,
Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KAHER, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi-590010, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: harpreetkour.kour@gmail.com

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common condition affecting the elderly population. Most of the time, it is diagnosed only after an individual suffers from a fracture. In addition to the fracture and its complications, the patients and their families must also bear the psychological and financial consequences of the disease. There are multiple risk factors associated with osteoporosis, hence it requires a multimodal approach in management as well. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive insight into the classification, prevalence, pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, risk factors, screening tools, management, differential diagnosis, prognosis, complications, and recent advances in osteoporosis.

Keywords

Age related bone loss, Bone mineral density, Male osteoporosis, Postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis means porous bones with decreased Bone Mineral Density (BMD), disrupted bone microarchitecture, and altered protein arrangements in the bone. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has defined osteoporosis as a systemic skeletal disease characterised by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture (1),(2).

Definition

As per BMD classification, a t-score is calculated. A t-score is a statistical test that measures Standard Deviation (SD) from the mean. A t-score of one SD is a normal score and is usually found in young adults (sex-matched 30-year-old). The WHO has a t-score for BMD. The t-score between -1 and -2.5 is known as osteopenia, i.e., low bone mass, and scores below -2.5 as osteoporosis (3). Osteoporosis is considered a silent menace because it progresses without any significant signs and symptoms until any fractures occur (4). Normally, the inside of the bone is like a honeycomb with compactly arranged osteocytes. In osteoporosis, the space between the bone cells increases, and the walls of the honeycomb also get thinner, which makes the bone weak and prone to fractures just due to minor fragility fractures, hence making bone density a major determinant of fracture risk (5),(6).

An imbalance in the physiological processes of bone resorption and bone remodeling with decreased skeletal mass relates to osteoporosis. The bone mass peaks at about the third decade of life, followed by a period of bone resorption that exceeds bone formation. In histologic specimens, adults with osteoporosis exhibit significantly reduced thickness of trabeculae, smaller osteon size, and enlargement of both Haversian canals and marrow spaces (7),(8).

Classification of Osteoporosis

There are mainly two types of osteoporosis:

1. Primary osteoporosis: It occurs as a part of the ageing process and according to a decrease in hormone levels in the body. As age progresses, the microstructure of the bones degrades, and BMD decreases, leading to an increased risk of fractures.

2. Secondary osteoporosis: It occurs due to secondary causes, including various medications used in the treatment of diseases including hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, anorexia nervosa, malabsorption syndrome, chronic renal failure, and Cushing syndrome. Conditions leading to long-term immobilisation can also result in secondary osteoporosis. Long-standing secondary amenorrhoea due to non oestrogen hormonal therapy, low body weight, and excessive exercise leading to decreased bone mass can contribute to secondary osteoporosis. Men are reported to have secondary osteoporosis more often than women (Table/Fig 1) (7),(8),(9).

Prevalence

A study done by Gullberg B et al., computed the expected hip fractures for the years 2025 and 2050. The study predicted that by the year 2050, hip fractures would rise to 45%, mainly in Asian countries. Osteoporosis is greatly underdiagnosed and undertreated in Asia, even in the highest-risk patients who have already experienced fractures. This is more prevalent in rural areas of Asian countries, may be due to less accessibility to diagnostic and treatment modalities (10). The International Osteoporosis Foundation; The Asia-Pacific Regional Audit- Epidemiology, costs, and burden of osteoporosis published in 2013 reported that more than 300 million Indians are suffering from osteoporosis-related bone fractures without even understanding that this could double the risk of death (11). By the age of 50, about 50% of Indians have osteopenia, whereas about 10% of the population above the age of 65 is at risk of osteoporotic fracture, and one in every three postmenopausal females is at risk of osteoporotic fracture (12),(13),(14),(15).

According to the National Osteoporosis Foundation, people suffer from about 1.5 million fractures annually (12). A study by Shatrugna V et al., among Indian women aged 30-60 years from a low-income group reported a high prevalence of 52% osteopenia and 29% osteoporosis (16).

Pathophysiology

Primary osteoporosis can be mainly due to age-related factors, including senile osteoporosis, postmenopausal osteoporosis, and idiopathic osteoporosis (17).

1. Senile osteoporosis:

a. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells show age-related transformation, leading to the inhibition of osteogenesis, i.e., new bone formation, hence causing excess bone loss.

b. Changes in the microenvironment of the bone due to age-related osteoblast dysfunction can lead to impairment in the differentiation and functions of the osteoblasts.

c. Endocrine dysfunctions are very common in the elderly population. Hormonal deficiencies of oestrogen, testosterone, cortisol, parathyroid, and thyroid, which play a major role in bone metabolism and remodeling, can lead to osteoporosis.

d. Lack of exercise or mobility influences osteoclastic activity, leading to rapid resorption of bone mass.

2. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: Caused mainly by oestrogen deficiency.

a. Inflammation due to oestrogen deficiency is caused by the actions of cytokines (Interleukin-1, Interleukin-17, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-7, Tumour Necrosis Factor-α) on the oestrogen receptors, effectively leading to the inhibition of osteoblasts and promotion of osteoclasts.

b. Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-Kappa-B Ligand (RANKL) is necessary for osteoclast development from myeloid precursors. Oestrogen deficiency affects RANKL, leading to the inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and osteoporosis.

3. Idiopathic osteoporosis: Very rare and usually due to genetic mutations.

Signs and Symptoms

Osteoporosis leads to thinning of the cortex, causing fragility of the bones. Hence, fractures can occur in weakened bones even with trivial trauma. Vertebral body fractures are the most common, followed by fractures around the hip and wrist. The maintenance of bone density in our bodies relies on a delicate balance between bone resorption and new bone formation. Total bone mass peaks in an individual around the age of 35. As age increases, this balance is disrupted, leading to increased bone resorption and/or slowed new bone formation, resulting in weakened bones. This imbalance typically begins in a person’s late 30’s, with accelerated bone resorption in postmenopausal women. This process often goes unnoticed until a fracture occurs. Osteoporosis is more common in females due to several reasons: women generally have less bone mass in comparison to men, they tend to live longer, and their calcium intake is usually less. The rate of bone resorption accelerates in postmenopausal women as oestrogen levels fall. The same occurs when a lady undergoes surgical removal of the ovaries, with or without the uterus (14),(15),(16).

Repeated falls may occur due to age-related factors like impaired eyesight, gait disorders, balance disorders (cerebellar pathology), movement disorders (extrapyramidal tract involvement), dementia (Alzheimer’s disease), and sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle mass). Vertebral body fractures may lead to spine instability, resulting in repeated falls, which can commonly lead to fractures around the hip and wrist joints. Hip fractures require surgical management to prevent complications from prolonged bed rest. Deep vein thrombosis and its complication, pulmonary embolism, are serious complications that can lead to increased mortality. Urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, malnourishment, protein imbalance, loss of muscle mass, and bedsores are complications that cause higher morbidity in patients with prolonged bed rest following hip fractures. Encouraging the elderly population to walk with support (walking aids), removing obstacles and loose carpets in living rooms, decreasing the height of stairs, and using appropriate footwear may substantially reduce falls (18).

The main issue is the failure to diagnose osteoporosis early, as individuals often do not exhibit specific signs or symptoms. Most of the time, it is diagnosed only after the patient has suffered a fracture or fracture-related complications such as lower limb deformity, chronic backache, reduced height (due to vertebral collapse), or a hunched back (kyphotic deformity). These problems tend to occur after a significant amount of bone calcium has already been lost (19).

Risk Factors for Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is more common in females, mainly after menopause. Individuals over 65 years old are at an increased risk, as are those with low body weight relative to their height and age. Ethnicity, such as being white or Asian, increases the risk, but African American and Hispanic/Latina women are also at risk, as are those with a history of irregular menstrual cycles or psychiatric illnesses like dementia or anorexia nervosa. Patients with a family history of osteoporosis and fractures are also at a higher risk (20),(21). Patients with a history of long-term use of certain medications, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for treating depression and anxiety, thiazolidinediones (22) glucocorticoids to treat arthritis (23), asthma (24), and lupus (25), antiseizure medicines (26), gonadotropin-releasing hormones for endometriosis (27); proton pump inhibitors containing aluminum that block calcium absorption (28); some cancer treatments (29); too much replacement of thyroid hormone (30); can also contribute to osteoporosis. Smoking, alcohol consumption, a diet low in dairy products or other sources of calcium and vitamin D, and physical inactivity can also contribute as modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis (31) (Table/Fig 2).

Alarming Signs

The warning signs for osteoporosis include a loss of height after puberty, the development of a slumped or hunched posture, back pain with an unspecified cause, women aged 45 or postmenopausal, and a history of repeated fractures. Surprisingly, in 50% of cases, the cause of osteoporosis in men is unknown, while the other 50% is due to age-related bone loss, malabsorption, nutritional deficiencies, chronic alcoholism, smoking, testosterone deficiency, pituitary insufficiency, chronic illnesses (such as chronic renal diseases, hepatic insufficiency, GI malabsorption syndrome, chronic inflammatory polyarthritis, chronic debility, or immobilisation), and tumours. Disuse osteoporosis is common in persons with a sedentary lifestyle (30),(31),(32),(33).

Screening Tools for Osteoporosis

BMD analysis is widely used for screening osteoporosis. Other simple screening tools available include the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI), Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE), Age-Bulk-one or Never Oestrogen (ABONE), Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES), and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). These tools can moderately predict the risk of osteoporosis. Complete laboratory assessments, including renal function tests, thyroid function tests, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and calcium levels, are also done to confirm osteoporosis. However, Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosing osteoporosis. Unfortunately, availability is limited in developing countries like India, especially in primary healthcare settings and rural areas. The rate of fractures increases exponentially with the decrease in DEXA score. X-rays are helpful in identifying osteoporosis only in advanced stages (Table/Fig 3) (34),(35),(36),(37).

The WHO recommends DEXA test for assessing BMD. This test can measure calcified tissues, with better specificity than sensitivity compared to other testing modalities for osteoporosis. It takes approximately five minutes of minimal radiation exposure. DEXA provides a t-score and a z-score. The t-score reflects the difference between measured BMD and the mean value of BMD in young adults (37).

Interpretation (3),(38)

a. Normal: T score within one standard deviation of the young adult mean.

b. Osteopenia: scores between -1 and -2.5.

c. Osteoporosis: scores below -2.5 (Table/Fig 4).

The bottom line is, if an individual is 65 or older or has any risk factors as mentioned above, they should get a bone density test done.

Treatment

Non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis: Lifestyle modification should include weight-bearing and muscle-strengthening exercises. A healthy diet with plenty of calcium and vitamin D is prescribed. Treatment for osteoporosis starts with dietary changes. Calcium supplements and oral vitamin D preparations may be given if oral intake is inadequate. The patients are advised to quit smoking cessation and to restrict alcohol intake (39),(40).

The following are dietary recommendations for Bone Health:

1. Calcium: Calcium plays an important role in skeletal mineralisation. More than 99% of the body’s calcium is stored in bone as hydroxyapatite. As per the 2020 guidelines from ICMR-NIN, the dietary recommendations for Indian adults are as follows: 1000 mg/day for adult males and females, pregnant women, and 1200 mg/day for lactating women. For infants, 300 mg/day; children aged 1-3 years, 500 mg/day; children aged 4-6 years, 550 mg/day; children aged 7-9 years, 650 mg/day; boys and girls aged 10-12 years, 850 mg/day; boys and girls aged 13-15 years, 1000 mg/day; and boys and girls aged 16-18 years, 1050 mg/day (40). Other important nutrients include vitamin K, vitamin C, magnesium, zinc, as well as protein to build strong bones (41).

2. Dairy products such as milk, yogurt, and cheese are rich in calcium. Approximately 100 grams of cheese provide 1 gram of calcium, 100 grams of milk provide 100 mg of calcium, and 100 grams of yogurt provide 180 mg of calcium. Fruits like Amla, Guavas, Bananas, Jackfruits, and Chiku, Custard apple are good sources of calcium. Fortified foods can also be important sources of calcium (42),(43),(44),(45).

3. Dry beans including Kidney beans, Black-eyed peas, Chickpeas, Black Peas, Turnip greens, radish, Bottle gourd, Foxnut, chestnuts/chestnuts are good sources of calcium. About 100 grams of cereals usually provide around 30 mg of calcium. Vegetables rich in calcium include kale, broccoli, and watercress, providing between 100 and 150 mg per 100 grams (46).

4. Nuts and Seeds including almonds, sesame, and chia can provide between 250 and 600 mg per 100 g of calcium. Peanuts, groundnuts, walnuts, cashew nuts, almonds, and fruit seeds like melon seeds and watermelon seeds are good sources of calcium (47),(48).

5. Coconut: Coconut, known as a wonder fruit, due to its rich macro- and micronutrient composition and is a vital mineral for bone strength. Coconut milk provides approximately 38 milligrams of calcium per 100 milliliters, and coconut water contains 27.35 mg/100 mL. It is particularly rich in calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium, essential for bone mineralisation and overall bone health. A review published in the Journal of Food Science and Technology highlighted the role of coconut milk in promoting bone health due to its calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium content, which contribute to bone mineralisation and help prevent bone-related disorders. An animal study in the Journal of Medicinal Food demonstrated that supplementing with coconut milk significantly increased BMD and improved bone strength in rats (42),(49),(50).

6. Vitamin D: Vitamin D is essential for the absorption of calcium in bones. It is synthesised in the skin with exposure to sunlight. For individuals with Vitamin D deficiency or limited sun exposure, Vitamin D supplements with 400 to 600 IU per day or 60,000 International Units once a week are prescribed. Foods such as milk, buttermilk, curds, paneer (cottage cheese), cooked eggs, salmon, and vitamin D-fortified milk are good sources of vitamin D (51),(52),(53).

7. Proteins: Dietary protein has a major role in the development and repair of the musculoskeletal system. Proteins break down into essential and non essential amino acids, which are necessary for the synthesis of bone matrix and skeletal muscle proteins. Amino acids also stimulate the gene expression of insulin-like growth factor-1, a hormone that exerts anabolic effects on bone and muscle. Adequate protein consumption is essential for preserving muscle mass and bone health. Non vegetarian sources of protein include lean red meat, chicken, fish, and eggs, which provide first-class and complete protein. Milk and dairy products are also good sources of protein, offering excellent animal protein sources. Vegetarian protein sources include legumes (e.g., lentils, kidney beans), soy products (e.g., tofu), grains, nuts, and seeds, which are considered second-class and incomplete proteins (54),(55),(56).

8. Individuals at risk of osteoporosis should stop smoking and limit alcohol consumption (57),(58).

9. Additionally, for elderly populations, ensure the home is a safe environment to reduce chances of falls. Use proper lighting at home during the night, place a rubber bath mat in the shower or tub to prevent slips, keep floors free from clutter, remove throw rugs that may cause tripping, and use grab bars in the bath or shower to prevent falls and hence decreases the risk of fractures (59).

Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis (Table/Fig 5)

There are plethoras of pharmacological treatment options that work through Antiresorptive or anabolic mechanisms with the aim of reducing the risk of fractures in patients with osteoporosis (60). Pharmacological treatments are broadly classified into two categories:

a. Antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates, oestrogen agonists, oestrogen antagonists, calcitonin, and denosumab act by slowing down the resorption of bones.

b. Anabolic agents like teriparatide act by strengthening bones and stimulating bone synthesis (61).

In women with known osteoporosis, drugs including risedronate, alendronate, zoledronic acid, or denosumab are used to reduce the risk of fractures. Bazedoxifene, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator combined with conjugated oestrogen, has been approved by the FDA for the prevention of osteoporosis but not for treatment. Hormonal therapy is advised for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in asymptomatic postmenopausal women (62),(63),(64).

Bisphosphonates are the first-line therapy for osteoporosis in men (65). The Endocrine Society recommends zoledronic acid for men with a recent hip fracture, risedronate for men at risk for hip fractures, and teriparatide for men at high-risk for fracture (66).

Raloxifene, Ibandronate, and Teriparatide are used if patients are unable to tolerate the above medications. The use of combination therapy with teriparatide and a bisphosphonate or teriparatide and denosumab in patients with severe osteoporosis and hip and vertebral fractures is worth considering (67).

These drugs can also be classified as non nitrogen and nitrogen-containing compounds. The nitrogen-containing compounds inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, ultimately inhibiting osteoclast resorption and inducing osteocyte apoptosis.

Commonly used medications include:

- Alendronate, which may reduce the rate of hip, spine, and wrist fractures by 50%.

- Risedronate, which may reduce vertebral and non vertebral fractures by 40% over three years.

- Intravenous zoledronic acid, which reduces the rate of spine fractures by 70% and hip fractures by 40% over three years.

- RANKL inhibitors (denosumab): Denosumab is a monoclonal Ig2 that targets RANKL and inhibits its ability to bind to RANK, resulting in the inhibition of osteoclast activation (68),(69),(70).

Differential Diagnosis

Conditions like homocystinuria, hyperparathyroidism, imaging in osteomalacia and renal osteodystrophy, mastocytosis, multiple myeloma, Paget’s disease, scurvy, and sickle cell anaemia should be considered for differential diagnosis before starting the treatment of osteoporosis (71).

Prognosis of Osteoporosis

Early detection leads to better outcomes. Chronic bone pain and fractures are the outcomes of untreated osteoporosis. Lifestyle modification in terms of healthy diet and exercise have been proven to be useful in preventing osteoporosis. Special emphasis should be given to postmenopausal women and individuals aged 65 and above (72).

Complications: Hip and spinal column fractures are the most common complications of osteoporosis. Falls are the commonest cause of hip fractures, leading to further disability and an increased risk of mortality. Spinal fractures can also occur, and in the absence of patient falls, compression fractures may lead to back pain and a kyphotic posture (73).

Recent advances: Novel therapies include newer selective oestrogen receptor modulators, Cathepsin-K inhibitors, and antisclerostin antibodies. Gene therapy represents the most recent advancement in the management of osteoporosis. Wingless related integration site (WNT)-modulating gene silencers are being explored as a form of gene therapy for osteoporosis and bone fractures (74),(75).

Conclusion

Osteoporosis is a common condition affecting the elderly population and is often diagnosed only after a fragility fracture and its complications, osteoporosis also has psychological and financial impacts on individuals. There are multiple known risk factors that contribute to the development of osteoporosis, hence it best managed by an inter-professional team of healthcare workers. Community education is crucial as many people are unaware of the serious consequences

References

1.
Kanis JA. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. WHO Scientific Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School. 2008. Osteoporosis. p-288. Last accessed on 31-12-2023.
2.
Kanis JA, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, Bruyère O, Veronese N, Lorentzon M, et al. Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(1):01-12. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
NIH Consensus Development Panel on: Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285(6):785-95. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Mohammed ZA, Almeshal MA, Aldawsari SA, Alanazi MA, Alanazi AD, Alqahtani FA, et al. Prevalence of fracture and osteoporosis and awareness of osteoporosis among general population of Majmaah City in 2013. Indo Am JP Sci. 2019;357-61.
5.
Dziedzic K, Hammond A. Chapter 20: Osteoporosis. In: Dowson C and Lewis R (eds). Rheumatology: Evidence-Based Practice for Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists. Churchill Livingstone; 2010. Pp. 289-305. [crossref]
6.
Sozen T, Ozişik L, Başaran NÇ. An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017;4(1):46-56. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, et al. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: Summary. CMAJ. 2010;182(17):1864-73. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Varacallo MA, Fox EJ. Osteoporosis and its complications. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(4):817-31. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Varacallo M, Seaman TJ, Jandu JS, Pizzutillo P. Osteopenia. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL): Oct 24; 2022. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29763053/.
10.
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(5):407-13. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Mithal A, Bansal B, Kyer CS, Ebeling P. The Asia-Pacific Regional Audit-epidemiology, costs, and burden of osteoporosis in India 2013: A report of International Osteoporosis Foundation. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(4):449-54. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, et al. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s Guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359-81. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kadam NS, Chiplonkar SA, Khadilkar AV, Khadilkar VV. Prevalence of osteoporosis in apparently healthy adults above 40 years of age in Pune City, India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;22(1):67-73. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kaushal N, Vohora D, Jalali RK, Jha S. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - A cross-sectional retrospective study. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018;4(2):53-60. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Ji MX, Yu Q. Primary osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015;1(1):09-13. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Shatrugna V, Kulkarni B, Kumar PA, Rani KU, Balakrishna N. Bone status of Indian women from a lowincome group and its relationship to the nutritional status. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1827-35. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Rosen CJ, Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, et al,.The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Osteoporosis. In: Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000. 2020 Jun 21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25905357/.
18.
Melton LJ 3rd, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Therneau TM, Amin S. Long-term mortality following fractures at different skeletal sites: A population-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(5):1689-96. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Carpintero P, Caeiro JR, Carpintero R, Morales A, Silva S, Mesa M. Complications of hip fractures: A review. World J Orthop. 2014;5(4):402-11. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2004. PMID: 20945569.
21.
Van der Voort DJM. Geusens PP, Dinant GJ. Risk factors for osteoporosis related to their outcome: Fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:630-38. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Kashfi SS, Abdollahi G, Hassanzadeh J, Mokarami H, Khani Jeihooni A. The relationship between osteoporosis and depression. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11177. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Lin L, Luo P, Yang M, Wang J, Hou W, Xu P. Causal relationship between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis: A two-sample Mendelian randomized study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:1011246. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Wee JH, Min C, Park MW, Byun SH, Lee HJ, Park B, et al. The association of asthma and its subgroups with osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study using KoGES HEXA data. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020;16:84. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Barbulescu A, Vreju FA, Criveanu C, Rosu A, Ciurea P. Osteoporosis in systemic lupus erythematosus - Correlations with disease activity and organ damage. Curr Health Sci J. 2015;41(2):109-14. Doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.41.02.04. Epub 2015 Apr 10. PMID: 30364875; PMCID: PMC6201199.
26.
Pack AM. The association between antiepileptic drugs and bone disease. Epilepsy Curr. 2003;3(3):91-95. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Uehara M, Wada-Hiraike O, Hirano M, Koga K, Yoshimura N, Tanaka S, et al. Relationship between bone mineral density and ovarian function and thyroid function in perimenopausal women with endometriosis: A prospective study. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22:134. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Lespessailles E, Toumi H. Proton pump inhibitors and bone health: An update narrative review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10733. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Drake MT. Osteoporosis and cancer. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:163-70. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Delitala AP, Scuteri A, Doria C. Thyroid hormone diseases and osteoporosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1034. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Pouresmaeili F, Kamalidehghan B, Kamarehei M, Goh YM. A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;6:2029-49. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Vilaca T, Eastell R, Schini M. Osteoporosis in men. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(4):273-83. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Herrera A, Lobo-Escolar A, Mateo J, Gil J, Ibarz E, Gracia L. Male osteoporosis: A review. World J Orthop. 2012;3(12):223-34. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Prince RL, Lewis JR, Lim WH, Wong G, Wilson KE, Khoo BC, et al. Adding lateral spine imaging for vertebral fractures to densitometric screening: Improving ascertainment of patients at high-risk of incident osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(2):282-89. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Khadka B, Tiwari ML, Gautam R, Timalsina B, Pathak NP, Kharel K, et al. Correlates of biochemical markers of bone turnover among post-menopausal women. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018;56:754-58. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Rubin KH, Abrahamsen BO, Friis-Holmberg T, Hjelmborg JVB, Bech M, Hermann AP, et al. Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study. Bone. 2013;56(1):16-22. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Cherian KE, Kapoor N, Meeta M, Paul TV. Screening tools for osteoporosis in India: Where do we place them in current clinical care? J Midlife Health. 2021;12(4):257-62. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, et al. A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(8):699-705. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Unnanuntana A, Gladnick BP, Donnelly E, Lane JM. The assessment of fracture risk. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(3):743-53. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
ICMR-NIN Expert Group on Nutrient Requirement for Indians, Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) and Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) 2020. Available at: https://www.nin.res.in/RDA_Full_Report_2020.html. Last accessed on 12th March 2024.
41.
Body JJ, Bergmann P, Boonen S, Boutsen Y, Bruyere O, Devogelaer JP, et al. Non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis: A consensus of the Belgian bone club. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(11):2769-88. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Coronado-Zarco R, Olascoaga-Gómez de León A, García-Lara A, Quinzaños-Fresnedo J, Nava-Bringas TI, Macías-Hernández SI. Non-pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis treatment: Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2019;5(3):69-77. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Health Organization. Human vitamin and mineral requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation, Bangkok, Thailand. Food and Nutrition Division, FAO, Rome, 2001:235-47.
44.
Huang F, Wang Z, Zhang J, Du W, Su C, Jiang H, et al. Dietary calcium intake and food sources among Chinese adults in CNTCS. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):0205045. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
World Health Organization. Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2004. Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutritionwho.int). Last accessed on 21st November. (2023). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241546123.
46.
Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: What clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(1):53-58. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Sanwalka NJ, Khadilkar AV, Chiplonkar SA. Development of non-dairy, calcium-rich vegetarian food products to improve calcium intake in vegetarian youth. Current Science. 2011;10:657-63.
48.
Ros E. Health benefits of nut consumption. Nutrients. 2010;2(7):652-82. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Dodevska M, Kukic Markovic J, Sofrenic I, Tesevic V, Jankovic M, Djordjevic B, et al. Similarities and differences in the nutritional composition of nuts and seeds in Serbia. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1003125. [crossref][PubMed]
50.
Prakruthi Appaiah L, Sunil PK, Prasanth Kumar AG, Krishna G. Composition of Coconut Testa, Coconut Kernel and its Oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2014;91(6):917-24. [crossref]
52.
Hayatullina Z, Muhammad N, Mohamed N, Soelaiman IN. Virgin coconut oil supplementation prevents bone loss in osteoporosis rat model. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:237236. [crossref][PubMed]
52.
Laird E, Ward M, McSorley E, Strain JJ, Wallace J. Vitamin D and bone health: Potential mechanisms. Nutrients. 2010;2(7):693-724. [crossref][PubMed]
53.
Hill TR, Aspray TJ. The role of vitamin D in maintaining bone health in older people. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017;9(4):89-95. [crossref][PubMed]
54.
Voulgaridou G, Papadopoulou SK, Detopoulou P, Tsoumana D, Giaginis C, Kondyli FS, et al. Vitamin D and calcium in osteoporosis, and the role of bone turnover markers: A narrative review of recent data from RCTs. Diseases. 2023;11(1):29. [crossref][PubMed]
55.
Bonjour JP. Protein intake and bone health. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2011;81(2-3):134-42.[crossref][PubMed]
56.
Mangano KM, Sahni S, Kerstetter JE. Dietary protein is beneficial to bone health under conditions of adequate calcium intake: An update on clinical research. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17(1):69-74. [crossref][PubMed]
57.
Zittermann A, Schmidt A, Haardt J, Kalotai N, Lehmann A, Egert S, et al. Protein intake and bone health: An umbrella review of systematic reviews for the evidence-based guideline of the German Nutrition Society. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(8):1335-53. [crossref][PubMed]
58.
Yuan S, Michaëlsson K, Wan Z, Larsson SC. Associations of smoking and alcohol and coffee intake with fracture and bone mineral density: A Mendelian randomization study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;105(6):582-88. [crossref][PubMed]
59.
Baron JA, Farahmand BY, Weiderpass E, Michaëlsson K, Alberts A, Persson I, et al. Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and risk of hip fracture in women. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(7):983-88. [crossref][PubMed]
60.
Cosman F, de Beur S, LeBoff M, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359-81. [crossref][PubMed]
61.
Bhadada SK, Chadha M, Sriram U, Pal R, Paul TV, Khadgawat R, et al. The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16(1):102. [crossref][PubMed]
62.
Meeta M, Harinarayan CV, Marwah R, Sahay R, Kalra S, Babhulkar S. Clinical practice guidelines on postmenopausal osteoporosis: An executive summary and recommendations- Update 2019-2020. J Mid-life Health. 2020;11(2):96-112. [crossref][PubMed]
63.
Jhaveri S, Upashani T, Bhadauria J, Biswas S, Patel K. Current clinical practice scenario of osteoporosis management in India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):RC04-RC08. [crossref][PubMed]
64.
Khadilkar AV, Mandlik RM. Epidemiology and treatment of osteoporosis in women: An Indian perspective. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:841-50. [crossref][PubMed]
65.
Sim IW, Ebeling PR. Treatment of osteoporosis in men with bisphosphonates: Rationale and latest evidence. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2013;5(5):259-67. [crossref][PubMed]
66.
Watts NB, Adler RA, Bilezikian JP, Drake MT, Eastell R, Orwoll ES, et al. Osteoporosis in men: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol and Metab. 2012;97(6):1802-22. [crossref][PubMed]
67.
Tu KN, Lie JD, Wan CKV, Cameron M, Austel AG, Nguyen JK, et al. Osteoporosis: A review of treatment options. P T. 2018;43(2):92-104.
68.
Tandon VR, Sharma S, Mahajan S, Mahajan A, Khajuria V, Gillani Z. First Indian prospective randomized comparative study evaluating adherence and compliance of postmenopausal osteoporotic patients for daily alendronate, weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate regimens of bisphosphonates. J Midlife Health. 2014;5(1):29-33. [crossref][PubMed]
69.
Lu J, Hu D, Zhang Y, Ma C, Shen L, Shuai B. Current comprehensive understanding of denosumab (the RANKL neutralizing antibody) in the treatment of bone metastasis of malignant tumours, including pharmacological mechanism and clinical trials. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1133828. [crossref][PubMed]
70.
Porter JL, Varacallo M. Osteoporosis. [Updated 2023 Aug 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441901/.
71.
Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Bell A, Brown V. Denosumab: Mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(12):1139-46. [crossref][PubMed]
72.
Taxel P, Kenny A. Differential diagnosis and secondary causes of osteoporosis. Clin Cornerstone. 2000;2(6):11-21. [crossref][PubMed]
73.
Ensrud KE, Kats AM, Boyd CM, Diem SJ, Schousboe JT, Taylor BC, et al. Association of disease definition, comorbidity burden, and prognosis with hip fracture probability among late-life women. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(8):1095-103. [crossref][PubMed]
74.
Tonk CH, Shoushrah SH, Babczyk P, El Khaldi-Hansen B, Schulze M, Herten M, et al. Therapeutic treatments for osteoporosis—which combination of pills. Is the best among the bad? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1393. [crossref][PubMed]
75.
Dimai HP. New horizons: Artificial intelligence tools for managing osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(4):775-83.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69058.19248

Date of Submission: Dec 12, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 07, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 06, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 05, 2024 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com