Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 3303

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : MC01 - MC06 Full Version

Surgical Outcomes of Tympanoplasty with Various Graft Materials in Chronic Otitis Media: A Retrospective Cohort Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69598.19284
Prasad Trimbakrao Deshmukh, Farhat Qamruddin Khan, Sagar Shankarrao Gaurkar

1. Professor and Unit Head, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Farhat Qamruddin Khan,
Senior Resident, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: farhatqk@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Otitis Media (COM) is a common ear disorder that predominantly affects underdeveloped countries. It is characterised by persistent middle ear discharge and a perforated Tympanic Membrane (TM). Management typically involves antibiotics and surgical techniques like tympanoplasty to eradicate infections and improve the auditory conduction system. Various graft materials are used, with temporalis fascia being preferred due to its proximity and ease of harvesting.

Aim: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of tympanoplasty procedures utilising different graft materials in patients diagnosed with inactive mucosal COM.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, between June 1, 2013, and May 31, 2023. A total of 165 participants with inactive mucosal COM, who had small to subtotal central perforations of the TM, were included. Tympanoplasty, performed by the same surgeon using the Zeiss surgical microscope model OPMI under general anaesthesia, was the chosen surgical procedure. All cases were executed using the postauricular approach with the underlay technique. A successful anatomical outcome was defined as an intact neo-TM without residual perforation at the end of a three-month follow-up.

Results: The age of participants ranged from 10 to 75 years, with a mean age of 32.45±14.06 years. The age group most frequently affected by mucosal COM was between 31-40 years, comprising 41 (24.85%) cases. Large perforations were observed in 79 (47.88%) patients, followed by moderate perforations in 65 (39.39%) patients. Normal ossicular chains were found in 163 (98.78%) patients, while ossicular erosion was noted in 2 (1.22%) patients during surgery. A total of 118 (100%) patients who came for follow-up, 84 (71.19%) who underwent temporalis fascia graft reconstruction showed successful graft uptake.

Conclusion: This study found that both fascia and cartilage tympanoplasty are suitable for TM repair due to their availability.

Keywords

Cartilage graft, Fat graft, Mastoid antrum, Myringoplasty, Ossicles, Ossicular chain, Temporalis fascia graft, Tympanic membrane perforation

Otitis Media (OM) refers to a complex group of infectious and inflammatory diseases that affect the middle ear. OM is quite common, with research indicating that over 80% of children have experienced atleast one episode by the age of three (1),(2). OM is broadly divided into two categories: acute and chronic. Despite adequate antibiotic therapy, Acute Otitis Media (AOM) can progress to Chronic Otitis Media (COM), which is characterised by persistent middle ear discharge and a perforated TM (1). It is one of the most prevalent ear conditions in developing countries. In India, the incidence of COM is around 30%, with a prevalence rate of 16 per 1,000 in urban areas and 46 per 1,000 in rural areas (3). Globally, COM affects over 330 million individuals, with 60% of them sustaining significant hearing loss, leading to a disease burden of over 2 million Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) (3). Symptoms of COM include discharge from the ear canal (otorrhea), ringing in the ears, ear fullness, headache, dizziness, and hearing impairment. The resulting hearing loss can negatively impact a child’s speech development, education, and behaviour (4). The diagnosis of COM can be confirmed through otoscopic or Microscopic Ear Examination (EUM), bacterial culture analysis, audiological assessment, facial nerve topography examination, and an antibiotic resistance testing of the ear discharge. The extent of the disease is assessed by temporal bone imaging through High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (5).

The management of COM involves the use of local and/or systemic antibiotics as the primary treatment, based on the patient’s clinical presentation. Surgical interventions are employed to eliminate infections that exhibit poor responsiveness to medical management and also to enhance the functionality of the auditory conduction system of the ear (6). Tympanoplasty is a surgical procedure that involves transferring tissue to repair a perforated TM. This procedure aims to restore auditory function and safeguard the middle ear from external factors such as infections. The surgical procedure of tympanoplasty was initially documented by Wullstein H and Sergi B et al., (7),(8), with subsequent modifications made by Zöllner F (9). Tympanoplasty commonly employs endomeatal, endaural, or postauricular routes as procedural techniques. Different surgical outcomes may be observed based on the dimensions, location of the defect, and the specific graft material employed (7).

Heerman J Jr et al., pioneered the use of temporalis fascia as a grafting material (10). Goodhill V established the concept of grafting tragal cartilage and perichondrium (11). Several other types of graft materials, such as periosteum, fat, vein, dura, or skin, have subsequently been employed to repair TM perforations (12). Among these, temporalis fascia remains the preferred choice for surgeons due to its proximity to the surgical site and the ease of harvesting. However, despite its ability to provide effective auditory function, there are notable concerns regarding its dimensional stability properties due to its lack of elasticity. This characteristic renders it more vulnerable to pressure variations, potentially leading to persistent perforation. This is particularly relevant in cases involving adhesive OM, eustachian tube dysfunction, or large TM perforations (13).

Cartilage grafts of suitable dimensions can be obtained from either the concha or the tragus, with minimal risk of morbidity at the donor area. In revision cases, cartilage grafts are commonly preferred by most surgeons due to their advantageous combination of strength and durability. However, these grafts may potentially yield a lower optimal functional outcome in terms of audiological restoration (14).

This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of tympanoplasty procedures utilising different graft materials in patients diagnosed with mucosal COM.

Material and Methods

This retrospective cohort study done in the patients with an inactive mucosal type of COM visiting the Outpatient Department (OPD) and Inpatient Department (IPD) of Otorhinolaryngology at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, over a 10-year period, from June 1, 2013, to May 31, 2023. The study included data analysis and interpretation six months after data collection of 165 participants from September 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Before commencement, the study, it was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2020-21/9123).

Inclusion criteria: A total of 165 participants with TM perforations in inactive mucosal COM between the age group of 10 and 80 years were included. Patients were included in the study and were posted for tympanoplasty once the ear had been dry for atleast six weeks.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, active or inactive squamosal COM, and ears with active discharge were excluded from the study.

Participants underwent a thorough and meticulous evaluation along with a demographic profile assessment. All patients were subjected to EUM to examine the status of the TM and middle ear mucosa and determine the size of the perforation (Table/Fig 1)a-c.

Ossicular chain status and its integrity, along with testing of audiological capacity as regards the disease, were done, along with all necessary investigations. The surgical procedure, tympanoplasty, was performed by the same surgeon utilising the Zeiss surgical microscope model OPMI under general anaesthesia. All cases were performed employing the postauricular approach with the underlay technique of graft placement (Table/Fig 2)a-d. The postoperative graft status and acceptance were studied and analysed (Table/Fig 3)a-d.

Surgical technique: To harvest the tragal cartilage, a single incision 15 mm in length was made, positioned 2-3 mm below the apex of the tragus. Traversing through the layers of skin, posterior perichondrium, cartilage, and anterior perichondrium. An extraperichondrial plane was established, and the cartilage was procured with the perichondrium preserved on both sides. Then, the perichondrium was excised from the medial aspect of the cartilage graft, resulting in the formation of a flap. This flap was subsequently positioned beneath the tympanomeatal flap to provide improved reinforcement and vascularisation. The temporalis fascia was obtained via a postauricular incision in all cases.

The margin of remnants of the TM was freshened, and the undersurface of the TM cleared. The tympanomeatal flap with the annulus was elevated from the 12 o’clock to the 6 o’clock position, and the handle of the malleus was bared. Ossicular chain integrity and mobility were assessed. The graft was placed over the handle of the malleus by the underlay technique. Following the repositioning of the tympanomeatal flap, the external canal was packed with gel foam.

After the surgical procedure, the patients were placed in a postoperative unit where they received antibacterial treatment and analgesics. The mastoid dressing was replaced on the third and fifth days after the surgery to evaluate the condition of the surgical site. On the seventh day after the operation, after suture removal, the patient was discharged on oral antibiotics along with topical antibiotic ear drops. Subsequent postoperative visits took place at weekly intervals for one month, and monthly thereafter for six months. An intact neo-TM without a residual perforation at the end of three month follow-up was considered a successful anatomical outcome.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done by using descriptive statistics, and the software used in the analysis was Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0.

Results

The present study involved 165 participants, including 102 (61.82%) females and 63 (38.18%) males with COM mucosal type. The study included participants ranging in age from 10 to 80 years, with the youngest being 10 years old and the oldest being 75 years old, with a mean age of 32.45 years. The age group most frequently afflicted by mucosal COM was between 31-40 years, with 41 (24.85%) cases, as shown in (Table/Fig 4).

A total of 79 (47.88%) patients had large perforations, followed by 65 (39.39%) with moderate perforations (Table/Fig 5).

A total of 52 (31.52%) had left-sided disease, 55 (33.33%) had bilateral disease, while 58 (35.15%) had diseased lateralisation in the right ear. In 163 (98.78%) patients among 165 (100%) cases in present study had a normal ossicular chain. In 2 (1.22%) patients, the incus was found to be eroded, and only in 1 (0.61%) were all ossicles missing (Table/Fig 6).

Among 13 (7.88%) cases with small central perforations, 9 (5.45%) were repaired using temporalis fascia graft, and only 1 (0.61%) with a composite graft of temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage. Fat as a graft was used for repairing only small perforations in 3 (1.82%) cases (Table/Fig 7).

A total of 118 (100%) patients who came for follow-up were considered. 84 (71.19%) patients in which temporalis fascia graft reconstruction was done, 79 (66.95%) had successful graft uptake (Table/Fig 8).

The following table depicts all six cases of graft failure, comparing the size of perforation, graft material utilised, and the status of the other ear leading to a failed surgical outcome (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

The main objective of tympanoplasty is to surgically restore the integrity of the TM, thereby preventing contamination resulting from exposure to pathogens and enhancing the vibratory surface area of the membrane, ultimately leading to improved hearing function (7),(15). Various factors impact both the anatomical and functional outcomes, such as the size and location of the perforation, the presence of persistent respiratory diseases, adhesion or bilateral ear infections, and the requirement for revision surgery. Hence, it is imperative to consider the characteristics of each graft material, the overall health status of the patient, and the likelihood of graft integration when selecting the appropriate type of graft. In the existing literature, it has been observed that tragal cartilage and temporal muscle fascia are commonly employed materials for myringoplasty type I, mostly attributed to the convenience of graft procurement and the high surgical success rate (13). Nevertheless, the comparative advantage of one graft over the other has long been debated.

Age has been widely acknowledged as a critical determinant in achieving favourable outcomes in tympanoplasty. Present study involved 165 participants, including 102 (61.82%) females and 63 (38.18%) males posted for tympanoplasty, with a mean age of 32.45±14.06 years, with the most afflicted age group being 31-40 years, involving 41 (24.85%) cases. Since the institute is a tertiary care facility, it is possible that the age gap is a result of most patients reporting late. Present study exhibited a slight increase in the prevalence among females, indicated by a Male-to-Female (M:F) ratio of 1:1.62. This finding was consistent with the results reported by Fadl FA, who found a M:F ratio of 1:1.42, Singh BJ et al., who reported a M:F ratio of 1:1.34, and Nagle SK et al., who observed a M:F ratio of 1:1.22 (16),(17),(18).

Extensive research has been conducted on the prognostic significance of the contralateral ear in relation to the success of tympanoplasty. Eustachian tube function is often symmetrical; therefore, when localised mucosal illness is absent, success may be predicted by the condition of the opposite ear (19),(20),(21). Nevertheless, no substantial disparities were observed across the groups in terms of the ear affected. However, a slight increase (35.15%) in the disease occurring in the right ear was observed. In keeping with present study finding, an increased incidence of right-sided unilateral TM perforation was observed in 48.9% of patients in a study done by Priyadarshini G et al., (22).

A large majority (79, 47.88%) of the total number of patients in present study had large perforations, followed by 65 (39.39%) with moderate perforations, 13 (7.88%) had small central perforations, and only 8 (4.85%) presented with subtotal perforations. Tripathi P and Nautiyal S studied 67 cases with 44.77% having subtotal perforation, out of which in 15 (22.38%) cases the incus was necrosed (23). Similarly, in present study, 2 (25%) patients with subtotal perforation had incus erosion found intraoperatively. There is a lack of unanimity among otorhinolaryngologists on the selection of graft material during tympanoplasty. The choice of graft is contingent upon the surgeon’s expertise and personal inclination. Temporalis fascia graft is a preferred choice among many surgeons due to its easy technique, versatility, and comparable thickness to the TM. Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of utilising temporalis fascia for the closure of small to moderate perforations. However, it has been observed that large and subtotal perforations, as well as cases involving eustachian tube dysfunction, are associated with a higher risk of graft failure (13),(24),(25).

The application of composite grafts has witnessed a notable surge, accompanied by the introduction of the usage of new composite grafts. In addition, there have been recent developments in the field of cartilage graft techniques, resulting in the emergence of novel versions of pre-existing methods. The cartilaginous graft can be fabricated to have a reduced thickness and a diameter that is sufficiently modest to reinforce only the weakened area of the affected TM. Alternatively, it can be contoured to address both the repair of a complete perforation of the TM and the reconstruction of ear ossicles, as documented by multiple authors (26),(27),(28),(29). In general, they favour the cartilage’s resistance to the varying negative pressure in the middle ear and the relatively longer time required for resorption. One notable advantage of cartilage tympanoplasty is the potential for continued epithelisation on the cartilage surface, even in cases where the graft becomes detached anteriorly (27),(29).

At the end of the 3rd month of follow-up, the neotympanum was assessed by otoscopic examination, and in 84 (100%) patients in which temporalis fascia graft reconstruction was done, 79 (94.05%) had successful graft uptake, while uptake with tragal cartilage with or without temporalis fascia in 32 (100%) patients was 31 (96.87%). In the study conducted by Bhattacharya SN et al., on 56 patients initially enrolled and subjected to type I tympanoplasty procedures, the overall graft take rate at three months, specifically focusing on the closure of perforations (referred to as anatomic success). The results indicated that the cartilage group exhibited a graft take rate of 93.3%, while the fascia group demonstrated a rate of 91.7%. However, this difference was not found to be statistically significant (28). In a similar study conducted by Yegin Y et al., the graft uptake achieved using the temporalis fascia technique was found to be 65%, while the cartilage approach yielded a graft uptake of 92.1%. The researchers concluded that the anatomical success rate of cartilage tympanoplasty surpassed that of temporalis fascia, and these findings exhibited statistical significance (30). There have been previous studies that demonstrated that the rate of graft uptake in cartilage tympanoplasty was higher compared to temporalis fascia tympanoplasty (Table/Fig 10) (29),(31),(32),(33),(34),(35),(36).

Tek A et al., proposed the utilisation of the cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty technique under the anterior portion of the temporalis muscle fascia, an approach deemed simple and practical, since it effectively enhances the graft uptake ratio. It is particularly beneficial for patients with preoperative anterior and subtotal TM perforations (37). Vashishth A et al., conducted a study examining the benefits of using cartilage palisade tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia. Their findings demonstrate a high success rate, particularly in challenging cases such as atelectasis and subtotal perforation (38). Fat graft myringoplasty has several advantages compared to other graft materials such as temporalis fascia graft, cartilage, or perichondrium, including simplicity in harvesting, ease of placement, and cost-effectiveness, as it may be conveniently conducted as an office procedure. Historically, the usage of fat graft as the preferred material has been centered on small perforations. Some authors limit the consideration of this graft to cases when the perforation size is less than 25% and confined within the pars tensa (39),(40). According to Dedden AE et al., the size of the perforation is a crucial determinant of success in fat graft material; perforations of more than one quadrant are considered unfavourable for fat grafting (39). As per the findings of Kaddour HS, it is recommended that the size of the perforation should not surpass 30% of the eardrum (41). In present study, fat graft myringoplasty was performed in two patients with small perforations, and the graft uptake was 100%. Terry RM et al., who performed fat graft myringoplasty to correct perforations of various sizes, cited a closure rate of 79.4% if the perforation accounted for less than 50% of the TM and 57.1% if the perforation was larger than that (42).

Ambani KP et al., found that the graft uptake rate in fat tympanoplasty was as low as only 53.3% in patients with moderate to large perforations compared to 80% with temporalis fascia graft (43). Out of the 6 (100%) cases in present study, where graft uptake failed, one had a moderate central perforation, and five had large central perforations. The majority, i.e., 4 out of 6 (66.67%) cases, had diseased contralateral ears, and in 5 out of 6 (83.34%) cases, temporalis fascia graft was used, which could have been one of the associated factors leading to residual perforation resulting in surgery failure. In their study of eight cases, Adkins WY and White B observed a higher rate of failure in tympanoplasty procedures among patients with bilateral perforations. Notably, three out of the four instances of tympanoplasty failure were associated with bilateral perforations (44). Kessler A et al., observed a greater incidence of post-tympanoplasty reperforations among individuals with an abnormal contralateral ear (45).

Nevertheless, Koch WM et al., conducted a study comprising 64 tympanoplasties and found no significant link between an abnormal contralateral ear and the outcome of the surgical procedure (46). Gianoli GJ et al., observed that there was no statistically significant distinction when comparing a subset of nine defective contralateral ears (47).

Therefore, the usage of cartilage grafts has been suggested in ears with a larger size of perforation or with a diseased contralateral ear as a means to enhance the overall outcomes of the surgical procedures.

Limitation(s)

The obvious limitation of the present study was the limited sample size, which restricts the extent to which the findings can be generalised. It is highly ideal to conduct a prospective study that includes a higher sample size and a longer duration of follow-up.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that cartilage grafts exhibit superior graft uptake compared to temporalis muscle fascia grafts used alone in cases with large or subtotal perforations. Fascia and perichondrium require a new vascular supply, but the cartilage is nourished by simple diffusion from the surrounding tissue. It can survive in a relatively avascularised state, making cartilage a viable alternative to the conventional temporalis fascia graft for reconstructing large or subtotal perforations. Cartilage seems to offer high resistance both to the lack of vascularisation and to infections, providing strength and durability in cases of eustachian tube dysfunction.

References

1.
Acuin JM. Chronic suppurative otitis media: A disease still waiting for solutions. Community Ear and Hearing Health. 2007;4(6):1. [crossref]
2.
Adoga A, Nimkur T, Silas O. Chronic suppurative otitis media: Socio-economic implications in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2010;4:3. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
World Health Organization Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media. Burden of Illness and Management Options. Available from: http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/activities/hearing_care/otitis_media.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2023.
4.
Tremble GE. Pneumatization of the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol. 1934;19(2):172-82. [crossref]
5.
Gomaa MA, Karim AR, Ghany HS, Elhiny AA, Sadek AA. Evaluation of temporal bone cholesteatoma and the correlation between high resolution computed tomography and surgical finding. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2013;6:21-28. Doi: 10.4137/CMENT.S10681. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A, Singh N. Tympanoplasty type I in children-An evaluative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(8):1071-76. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Wullstein H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1956;66(8):1076-93. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sergi B, Galli J, De Corso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: Report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Ital. 2011;31(6):366-71.
9.
Zöllner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955;69(10):637-52. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Heerman J Jr, Heerman H, Kopstein E. Faszia and cartilage palisade tympanoplasty; nine years experience. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91(3):229-41. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Goodhill V. Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. 1967;85(5):480-91. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J. Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: Follow-up study of 404 cases. Otology & Neurotology. 1993;14(3):301-05.
13.
Hardy SM, Heavner SB, White DR, Mcqueen CT, Prazma J, Pillsbury HC. Late-phase allergy and eustachian tube dysfunction. Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surg. 2001;125(4):339-45. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Sahan M, Derin S, Deveer M, Sağlam Ö, Çullu N, Sahan L. Factors affecting success and results of cartilage-perichondrium island graft in revision tympanoplasty. J Int Adv Otol. 2014;10(1):64-67. [crossref]
15.
Sheehy JL, Anderson RG. Myringoplasty: A review of 472 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89(4 Pt 1):331-34. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Fadl FA. Outcome of type-1 tympanoplasty. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(1):58-61.
17.
Singh BJ, Sengupta A, Das SK, Ghosh D, Basak B. A comparative study of different graft materials used in myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;61(2):131-34. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Nagle SK, Jagade MV, Gandhi SR, Pawar PV. Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;61(2):138-40. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Moneir W, El-Kholy NA, Ali AI, Abdeltawwab MM, El-Sharkawy AAR. Correlation of Eustachian tube function with the results of type 1 tympanoplasty: A prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(4):1593-601. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Dave V, Ruparel M. Correlation of eustachian tube dysfunction with results of tympanoplasty in mucosal type of chronic suppurative otitis media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(1):10-13. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Da Costa SS, Paparella MM, Schachern PA, Yoon TH, Kimberley BP. Temporal bone histopathology in chronically infected ears with intact and perforated tympanic membranes. Laryngoscope. 1992;102(11):1229-36. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Priyadarshini G, Sowmiya M, Febin J. Clinical and audiological study of chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(3):671-75. [crossref]
23.
Tripathi P, Nautiyal S. Incidence and preoperative predictive indicators of incudal necrosis in CSOM: A prospective study in a tertiary care centre. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(4):459-63. Doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1224-0. Epub 2017 Oct 11. PMID: 29238674; PMCID: PMC5714913. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SS. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(5):699-705. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Yung M, Vivekanandan S, Smith P. Randomized study comparing fascia and cartilage grafts in myringoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;120(8):535-41. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(3):471-74. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Yetiser S, Hidir Y. Temporalis fascia and cartilage-perichondrium composite shield grafts for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118(8):570-74. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Bhattacharya SN, Pal S, Saha S, Gure PK, Roy A. Comparison of a microsliced modified chondroperichondrium shield graft and a temporalis fascia graft in primary type I tympanoplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Ear Nose Throat J. 2016;95(7):274-83. PMID: 27434476.
29.
Demirci S, Tuzuner A, Karadas H, Acikgoz C, Caylan R, Samim EE. Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35(6):796-99. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.07.011. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Yegin Y, Celik M, Koc AK, Küfeciler L, Elbistanli MS, Kayhan FT. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):695-701. Doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.009. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Pradhan P, Anant A, Venkatachalam VP. Comparison of temporalis fascia and full-thickness cartilage palisades in Type-I underlay tympanoplasty for large/subtotal perforations. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;29(91):63-68. PMID: 28393052; PMCID: PMC5380390.
32.
Jalali MM, Motasaddi M, Kouhi A, Dabiri S, Soleimani R. Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2139-2148. Doi: 10.1002/lary.26451. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: A comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264(9):985-89. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0291-3. Epub 2007 Mar 31. PMID: 17401572. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Kalcioglu MT, Tan M, Croo A. Comparison between cartilage and fascia grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty. B-ENT. 2013;9(3):235-39. PMID: 24273955.
35.
Ozbek C, Çifti O, Tuna EE, Yazkan O, Ozdem C. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: Anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(5):679-83. Doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad57. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Chhapola S, Matta I. Cartilage-perichondrium: An ideal graft material? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(3):208-13. Doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0306-7. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Tek A, Karaman M, Uslu C, Habeşoğlu T, Kiliçarslan Y, Durmuş R, et al. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1117-26. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1779-4. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Vashishth A, Mathur NN, Choudhary SR, Bhardwaj A. Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(5):422-27. Doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2014.05.015. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Deddens AE, Muntz HR, Lusk RP. Adipose myringoplasty in children. Laryngoscope. 1993;103(2):216-19. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Liew L, Daudia A, Narula AA. Synchronous fat plug myringoplasty and tympanostomy tube removal in management of refractory otorrhoea in younger patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;66(3):291-96. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Kaddour HS. Myringoplasty under local anaesthesia: Day case surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992;17(6):567-68. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Terry RM, Bellini MJ, Clayton MI, Gandhi AG. Fat graft myringoplasty: A prospective trial. Clinotolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988;13(3):227-29. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Ambani KP, Gangwani RW, Bhavya BM, Vakharia SD, Katarkar AU. A comparative study between fat myringoplasty and temporalis fascia tympanoplasty in moderate to large central perforation of pars tensa of tympanic membrane. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(4):997-1001. Doi:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20174321. [crossref]
44.
Adkins WY, White B. Type I tympanoplasty: Influencing factors. Laryngoscope. 1984;94(7):916-18. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Kessler A, Potsic WP, Marsh RR. Type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(5):487-90.[crossref][PubMed]
46.
Koch WM, Friedman EM, McGill TJ, Healy GB. Tympanoplasty in children: The Boston Children’s Hospital experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(1):35-40. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Gianoli GJ, Worley NK, Guarisco JL. Pediatric tympanoplasty: The role of adenoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113(4):380-86.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69598.19284

Date of Submission: Jan 18, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Feb 19, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 01, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 20, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 20, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 26, 2024 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com