Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 100184

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : RC01 - RC04 Full Version

A Longitudinal Study on the Rare Entity of Acromial Apophysitis in Paediatric and Adolescent Ages


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66957.19300
Devendra Lakhotia, Utkarsh Agrawal

1. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Jaipur National University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Jaipur National University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Devendra Lakhotia,
Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Jaipur National University, Jaipur-302017, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: drdevendra.ortho@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Acromial apophysitis is a traction apophysitis caused by repetitive stress to the distal acromion. Although it is a common non-traumatic cause of shoulder pain in adolescence, data is scarce in the literature. There is a need for a better understanding of acromial apophysitis regarding its cause, diagnosis and management.

Aim: To determine the cause, clinical features, radiological findings, management, and outcome of the patients diagnosed with acromial apophysitis.

Materials and Methods: A longitudinal descriptive study was carried out at Jaipur National University Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre (JNUIMSRC), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, from August 2018 to August 2022. A total of 30 patients aged 10-20 years with shoulder pain, diagnosed with acromial apophysitis based on history, clinical, and radiological examination, were included in the study. The treatment given, duration of disease, and outcome were noted. Descriptive statistics were performed using Microsoft Office Excel.

Results: Out of 30 patients diagnosed with acromial apophysitis, 24 (80%) were male, and 6 (20%) were female, with a mean age of 13.47 (range 10-18) years. The cause was repetitive micro-trauma following chronic overuse during athletic and sports activities in 24 patients (80%). Among these patients, 13 played cricket, three played basketball, three played volleyball, two did weightlifting, one was a wrestler, one was a tennis player, and one was a judo player. Six patients (20%) did not give a history of playing any kind of sports. All patients had anterior shoulder pain with tenderness at the antero-lateral acromion. Radiographs showed fragmentation, sclerosis, and irregularity of the acromial apophysis. Conservative treatment included rest and restriction of sporting activities. The duration for the analgesics taken by patients was 8.9 days (range 3-21). The duration from the onset of symptoms to recovery was 5.8±1.61 weeks. None of the patients showed a recurrence of symptoms after complete recovery.

Conclusion: Acromial apophysitis is a common cause of shoulder pain in paediatric and adolescent age. It occurs due to repeated overhead abduction, overuse, and throwing activities, mostly in sports persons. It is diagnosed clinically and confirmed with plain radiographs. It is a self-limiting disease with a short benign course. It is treated conservatively with rest and analgesics and has an excellent outcome. This diagnosis should be kept in mind for shoulder pain in young patients to prevent undue investigations and surgery.

Keywords

Acromion, Apophysis, Clinical, Radiological, Shoulder pain

Apophysis is an accessory ossification center that overlies the growth plate and is subjected to traction forces of the muscles and tendons attached to them (1). Acromial apophysitis is a disorder caused by repetitive stress to the distal acromion in paediatric and adolescent age. It arises due to traction forces exerted through the tendons and muscles which insert into or arise from the acromion (2). These are common in skeletally immature individuals involved in sports with overhead activities (3),(4). The vigorous contraction of the deltoid muscle during throwing activities can cause micro-fractures, irritation, and inflammation at the weak area of the apophysis (5),(6). Only a few cases of acromial apophysitis have been reported previously (5),(6),(7),(8). All these described cases have similar symptoms, signs, and radiographic findings. This entity with similar clinical findings is described as acromial apophysiolysis in few studies (9),(10). Pitching was identified as a risk factor for superior shoulder pain in young throwing athletes (9).

The clinical manifestation of acromial apophysitis is typically characterised by shoulder pain in physically active skeletally immature patients. The pain is localised by palpation at the antero-lateral region of the acromion (6). Diagnosis is based on history, clinical examination, and radiological findings (7). Plain radiographs show fragmentation, irregularity, and sclerosis of the acromial apophysis (5),(6),(7). Acromial apophysitis has a benign course, and treatment is conservative. Resting, applying ice, stretching, strengthening the shoulder muscles, using an arm pouch, and taking anti-inflammatory drugs largely solve the problem (11). Although the disease usually has a benign course, it sometimes require extended treatment or causes an active athlete to stay away from the field for a while (6).

Apophysitis does not disrupt skeletal growth and has a favourable recovery or prognosis (6). But it is necessary to diagnose and treat acromial apophysitis as it is associated with os acromiale and rotator cuff tears after 25 years of age (9). Increased knowledge of acromial apophysitis and its risk factors can help physicians diagnose the disease as early as possible. Early diagnosis also helps to reduce the need for further higher radiological evaluations and un-necessary surgical interventions, which can be harmful and costly to the patients. This study intends to fill existing gaps in the literature, identify individuals at risk, and provide valuable insights into the diagnosis and treatment of acromial apophysitis.

Therefore, the study aimed to determine the aetiology, risk factors, clinical features, and radiological findings of acromial apophysitis and also to evaluate the management, outcome, and consequences of acromial apophysitis.

Material and Methods

This longitudinal descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics at Jaipur National University Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre (JNUIMSRC), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, from August 2018 to August 2022. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study (JNUIMSRC/IEC/2018/27).

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with acromial apophysitis based on history (shoulder pain), clinical examination, and radiological findings were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All trauma cases, concurrent labral or rotator cuff abnormalities, distal clavicular osteolysis, little league shoulder (proximal humeral epiphysiolysis) were excluded. Patients with missing or incomplete data and patients whose diagnosis of acromial apophysitis seemed suspicious, as well as patients who were lost to follow-up, were also excluded.

The records of all 220 patients who came to the outpatient clinic with shoulder pain aged between 10 and 20 years at the time of the first visit were obtained from the database records of the outdoor clinic. Out of 220 patients, 30 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included for the final evaluation. These 30 patients were contacted telephonically and called for the final evaluation after a minimum duration of six months.

Study Procedure

In all patients, a detailed history was taken, and a physical examination was conducted. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients regarding the disclosure of data. The patients’ age at onset, gender, affected side, anthropometric measurements such as height, weight and Body Mass Index (BMI), duration of symptoms, detailed history, and type of sports involved were recorded. The severity of pain was categorised as mild, moderate, or severe based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the point of tenderness at the shoulder was noted. The radiographic findings and treatment duration of the disease were analysed. Radiographs were taken at the time of presentation and when the patient was called for final evaluation after a minimum duration of six months of the disease. The treatment duration was defined as the period between symptom onset and the return to pain-free shoulder range of motion.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft office excel software. Descriptive statistics were presented in percentages and mean±SD for categorical and continuous data, respectively.

Results

Out of 30 patients diagnosed with acromial apophysitis, 24 (80%) were male, and 6 (20%) were female. The mean age of the patient group was 13.47 years (10-18 years). The average age was 13.54 years (10-18 years) for boys and 12.83 years (11-14 years) for girls at the time of the first visit to the clinic. The average height was 160.1 cm±11.58 cm. The average weight was 54.27 kg±8.10 kg, and the Body Mass Index (BMI) was 21.15±1.97. The right shoulder was involved in 21 cases, and the left in nine. None of the cases had bilateral symptoms. The mean duration from the onset of symptoms to recovery was 5.8 weeks±1.61 weeks. The mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at the time of the initial presentation was 5.93±2.26 (range: 2-9). Pain was mild in 6 cases, moderate in 14 cases, and severe in 10 cases according to the VAS Score. Pain and tenderness were localised to the antero-lateral part of the acromion in all cases. Radiographs at the time of diagnosis showed fragmentation, sclerosis, and irregularity of the acromion (Table/Fig 1). None of the cases had any residual pain at the final follow-up. All of them showed healing of the acromial lesion in radiographs taken at the final follow-up (Table/Fig 2).

Out of 30 patients, 24 (80%) were involved in sports and athletic activities. Among these patients, 13 played cricket, three played basketball, three played volleyball, two did weight lifting, one was a wrestler, one was a tennis player, and one practiced judo. Initially, oral Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) were initiated in all patients. The daily dose was divided into two and given every 12 hours. The duration for which the analgesics were taken by the patient was 8.9 days (3-21 days). Patients were advised to avoid sports activities and daily activities involving overhead abduction. Ten patients with severe pain were advised for arm immobilisation for 1 to 4 weeks, depending on the severity of pain. Range of motion exercises were started when the patient was pain-free and asymptomatic. None of the patients showed a recurrence of symptoms after recovery during a minimum follow-up of six months.

Discussion

Acromial apophysitis is a condition seen in young athletes involved in overhead sports activities. This disease is characterised by pain and inflammation involving the acromion. While acromial apophysitis has been a common cause of shoulder pain in young athletes, there is still limited research on this condition and its optimal management (Table/Fig 3) (5),(6),(7),(9),(12). In this study, 30 cases of acromial apophysitis with a minimum follow-up of six months were included. All the patients were in the age group of 10-20 years, with 80% of patients involved in athletic or sports activities. The chief complaint was shoulder pain, and all the patients responded well to conservative management with the restriction of activities.

Overuse injury to the shoulder with repetitive stress at the acromion has been reported as the causative factor of acromial apophysitis (3),(4). In the present study, 24 cases were involved in sports activities with overhead abduction. The various sporting activities included cricket, basketball, volleyball, wrestling, judo, tennis, and weight lifting. Thirteen cases were involved in cricket, and out of them, 10 were fast bowlers. Morisawa K et al., reported three cases in young athletes involved in overhead sports activities, and all had a satisfactory outcome with conservative management (6). Dharmshaktu GS reported acromial apophysitis in a 14-year-old fast cricket bowler (12). In cricket, players often experience overhead throwing motions which lead to stress at the acromial apophysis. Erin Quinlan E and Bogar WC reported the overuse of the shoulder causing traction apophysis of the acromion in a 13-year-old adolescent boy playing basketball, football, soccer, and track and field (7). Roedl JB et al., identified baseball or softball pitching as a risk factor for acromial apophysitis (9).

Six cases in the present study had no history of playing any kind of sports. The daily routine overhead activities along with the use of heavy school bags in the six patients with no sports activity might be the cause of acromial apophysitis in the paediatric and adolescent age group. Moyes DA et al., proposed that the contraction of the deltoid muscle against the pressure of a heavy school bag caused tension at the insertion point on the acromion, resulting in acromial apophysitis (5).

The mean age of the study group was 13.47 years (range: 10-18 years). The average age was almost the same for girls and boys. Similar age groups have been reported in previous case reports. Twenty-seven cases were under 15 years of age, and three cases were over 15 years of age (two were 17 years old, one was 18 years old). Roedl JB et al., found in their study that the average age was 19.6±2.80 years (range: 15.0-24.7) and described this entity as acromial apophysiolysis (9).

In this study, plain radiographs were used for diagnosis and to evaluate healing during follow-up. Plain radiographs showed sclerosis, fragmentation, and irregularity of the acromial apophysis. Similar radiological findings have been reported in various case reports (5),(6),(7). Some studies have used Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of acromial apophysitis and to rule out other pathologies such as os acromiale, subacromial impingement, or rotator cuff tears (9),(13). Given the self-resolving course of acromial apophysitis with a good prognosis, costly investigations can be avoided. More advanced investigations like MRI can be considered in older age groups with longer symptom duration or when the diagnosis is uncertain.

In this study, all cases responded well to conservative management with analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs, along with restrictions on sporting activities for 1 to 4 weeks depending on the severity of pain. Ten patients with severe pain were advised for arm immobilisation. In the study by Roedl JB et al., all cases were managed conservatively with anti-inflammatory drugs and a three-month cessation of pitching (9). Other case reports have also shown symptom resolution within one to six months with conservative treatment (5),(6).

Acromial apophysiolysis is significantly associated with the development of an os acromiale and rotator cuff tears after the age of 25 (9),(13). Therefore, it is crucial to diagnose acromial apophysitis/apophysiolysis early, restrict overhead shoulder use for a brief period, and prevent complications such as os acromiale, sub-acromiale impingement, and rotator cuff tears. Acromial apophysis disorders in the adolescent and paediatric age group differ from acromial disorders in older age groups in terms of diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and consequences.

Limitation(s)

The main limitations were a small sample size and a short follow-up period. Furthermore, higher investigations such as MRI and bone scans were not conducted. It is recommended that a study with a larger sample size, a longer follow-up period, and a similar course of management be undertaken to examine the recurrence of the disease or any relationship with rotator cuff tears or os acromiale in the coming years of life.

Conclusion

Traction apophysitis of the acromion, also known as acromial apophysitis, develops in paediatric and adolescent individuals engaged in overhead sporting activities. Conservative management, such as restricting overhead sports activities, immobilising the shoulder, and prescribing anti-inflammatory drugs for a brief period, yields satisfactory outcomes. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for diagnosing it in the paediatric and adolescent age groups, especially in countries like India where cricket is the most commonly played sport.

References

1.
Kaeding CC, Whitehead R. Musculoskeletal injuries in adolescents. Prim Care. 1998;25(1):211-23. Doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70333-x. PMID: 9469924. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Rask MR, Steinberg LH. Fracture of the acromion caused by muscle forces. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(8):1146-47. PMID: 721873.[crossref]
3.
Taneja AK, Negromonte FP, Skaf A. Stress injury of the acromion: Case report and literature review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(Suppl 2):S189-92. Doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1181-6. Epub 2013 Feb 13. PMID: 23412322. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Ward WG, Bergfeld JA, Carson WG Jr. Stress fracture of the base of the acromial process. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(1):146-47. Doi: 10.1177/ 036354659402200123. PMID: 8129099. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Moyes DA, Mawhinney D, Finch MB. Acromial apophysitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39(10):1164-65. Doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.10.1164. PMID: 11035147. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Morisawa K, Umemura A, Kitamura T, Ide J, Yamaga M, Takagi K. Apophysitis of the acromion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5(2 Pt 1):153-56. Doi: 10.1016/ s1058-2746(96)80012-7. PMID: 8742881. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Quinlan E, Bogar WC. Acromial apophysitis in a 13-year-old adolescent boy: A common condition in an uncommon location. J Chiropr Med. 2012;11(2):104- 08. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2011.10.008. PMID: 23204953; PMCID: PMC3368973. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Spehler H. L’apophysite acromiale: Une nécrose aseptique de l’os de localisation rare [Acromial apophysitis: An aseptic necrosis of bone in a rare location]. J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl. 1965;46(11):751-52. French. PMID: 5851421.
9.
Roedl JB, Morrison WB, Ciccotti MG, Zoga AC. Acromial apophysiolysis: Superior shoulder pain and acromial nonfusion in the young throwing athlete. Radiology. 2015;274(1):201-09. Doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140587. Epub 2014 Oct 14. PMID: 25314006. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Kjellin I. Acromial apophysiolysis. MRI Web Clinic. Radsource; 2015. Available from: https://radsource.us/acromial-apophysiolysis/. Accessed June 20, 2021. [crossref]
11.
Doral MN, Aydog ST, Tetik O, Atay OA, Turhan E, Demirel HA. Multiple osteochondroses and avulsion fracture of anterior superior iliac spine in a soccer player. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(3):e16. Doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013979. PMID: 15728684; PMCID: PMC1725144. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Dharmshaktu GS. Acromian Apophysitis An important cause of shoulder pain in adolescent bowler. Int J Res Orthop. 2019;29(1):01-02. [crossref]
13.
Pagnani MJ, Mathis CE, Solman CG. Painful os acromiale (or unfused acromial apophysis) in athletes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(4):432-35. Doi: 10.1016/j. jse.2005.09.019. PMID: 16831646.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66957.19300

Date of Submission: Aug 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 21, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 10, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 09, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 08, 2024 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com